Skip to main content

SLC1A3 C3590T but not BDNF G196A is a predisposition factor for stress as well as depression, in an adolescent eastern Indian population

Abstract

Background

Adolescence is a distinctive stage of various changes and is noted as peak age for onset of many psychiatric disorders, especially linked to stress and depression. Several genetic variations are being increasingly known to be linked with stress and depression. The polymorphisms in two such genes, the BDNF and SLC1A3, have been reported to be linked with either depression/stress or with suicidal behaviour. These genes have not been validated in Indian population, and therefore there is a need to investigate these genes in Indian population. The present study was undertaken to test whether the known polymorphisms SLC1A3 C3590T, SLC1A3 C869G and BDNF G196A are associated or not with stress or depression in an eastern Indian population.

Methods

A case-control association study was performed with 108 cases having variable levels of stress and depression and 205 matched controls. Detection of stress and depression was done by using standard instruments as PSS and CES-D, respectively and demographic profile was obtained for each individual on the basis of personal data sheet. Genotyping for the selected polymorphisms was performed by PCR followed by restriction digestion.

Results

The SNP SLC1A3 C3590T was found to be associated with stress and depression (p = 0.0042, OR = 2.072). Therefore, the T allele increases the risk by more than two folds for stress and depression in the present population. The other allele of SLC1A3, G869C, as well as BDNF G196A were not associated with stress or depression in the population studied.

Conclusion

SLC1A3 C3590T is a predisposition factor for stress and depression in an eastern Indian population, whereas SLC1A3 G869C and BDNF G196A were not found to be a risk factor. Therefore, presence of T allele of SLC1A3 C3590T, may predict the development of stress and depression in an individual. This may also help in the understanding of pathophysiology of the disease. However, these findings warrant a wider study in Indian populations and would be of significance in understanding the predisposition of stress and depression in this population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Stress is considered as a non-specific response of the body to any demand for change [1] or in medical terms any bodily change which causes mental tension; while depression is a mood disorder characterized by low mood, sadness and general loss of interest in life [2]. Adolescence or teenagers (13–21 years of age) is the stage of remarkable physical and behavioural changes in the brain and body and is noted as the peak age of onset for many psychiatric disorders, particularly linked with stress and depression [3]. Nevertheless, most of the teenagers successfully steer this transition stage and become a self-sufficient member of the society. More than one genetic variant(s) in conjunction with environmental factors are likely to increase risk for stress and depression.

Twin studies in past have implicated that heritability of depression ranges from 30 to 40% indicating a significant level of genetic involvement in the development of stress and depression [4,5,6]. Several genes and gene families have been scanned for their association with depression and one of them is the SLC1 gene family of solute carriers [7] which encodes the excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT). In humans, five isoforms of EAATs (EAAT1–5) are known which have different tissue localization. EAAT 1 (coded by SLC1A3 located on chromosome no. 5p13.2) transports glutamate in the brain. Glutamate is a ubiquitous amino acid, which acts as the major excitatory neurotransmitter in numerous projection fibres from cortical and subcortical structures [8], and also plays a crucial role in maintaining the activity of other neurotransmitter systems [9]. It is also recognized that the excitatory properties of glutamate remain under a delicate balance; otherwise it exerts damage or excitotoxicity that can range from cellular malfunction to extensive tissue injury [9]. In brain, specific high affinity glutamate transporters remove glutamate, which ends neurotransmitter activity until the next release of neurotransmitters occur [9]. Disturbance in glutamate uptake from synapses have been linked to reduced sensitivity to feel good, a symptom of depression [10]. Similarly, glutamate receptor AMPA subunit-1 knockout mice showed higher helplessness, lower serotonin and nor-epinephrine levels, disturbed glutamate homeostasis with high glutamate levels and increase in NMDA receptor expression. In ischemia, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, acute or chronic excitotoxicity associated with the excessive glutamate release is known to be the main cause of tissue damage. GWAS studies conducted for depression in last several years have identified different genetic loci [11], like tSNARE1 [12], and MALDIL1 [13] and several molecular pathways involved in cell adhesion and membrane scaffolding [14]. Microarray analysis has shown considerable reduction in the expression of the members of the SLC1 family of membrane transporters - SLC1A2 and SLC1A3, but increase levels of SLC17A7, in the depression cases compared to controls [15] suggesting their association with occurrence and/or severity of depression. SNP in SLC1A3 C3590T (rs 2269272) is a polymorphism in 3′ UTR, has shown association with suicidal behaviour [16]. The other SNP, SLC1A3 C869G (rs137852619), a missense polymorphism in protein coding region leading to conversion from C to G at 869 position, changes proline to arginine and found to be pathogenic, recorded in database but not validated with larger samples. The molecular functioning, genetic interactions and expression profiling of SLC1A3 gene was also studied, but a plausible relationship between sequence variations in SLC1A3 gene and depression, have not been studied so far.

A second important candidate gene is BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor; located on chromosome 11p13) whose molecular pathology has been extensively studied in depression cases [17]. BDNF gene codes for a neurotrophin, which is highly expressed in the central nervous system, particularly in the hippocampus region. It plays elementary role in proliferation, differentiation and survival of neuronal cells, as well as regulating synaptic plasticity and connectivity in the adult brain (memory acquisition and consolidation). The majority of BDNF is secreted via the regulated pathway and is derived from both pre- and postsynaptic sites. A widely accepted “neurotrophic hypothesis”, postulates that a reduction in BDNF expression is involved in the pathophysiology of major depression [18], while anti-depressant increases the expression of BDNF in hippocampus [19]. Further, prenatal stress has been shown to alter BDNF expression and signalling [20].

A single nucleotide polymorphism, G196A (rs6265), results in an amino-acid substitution from valine to methionine at codon 66 (Val66Met) in the prodomain of BDNF [21, 22]. Met allele carriers have shown to exhibit increased harm avoidance and also shows a higher prevalence of depression. A recent review proposed BDNF stress-sensitivity hypothesis which states that disruption of endogenous BDNF activity potentiates sensitivity to stress [23]. Val66Met polymorphism is common in human population; however the allele frequencies have been shown to be varying in specific ethnic backgrounds [24, 25]. A considerably higher frequency of Met allele in poor episodic memory performance, a symptom often observed in subjects with depression [26] and also in stress related psychiatric disorders have been reported [23]. Subsequently, in-vitro analysis in animal models have suggested that ‘Met’ allele alters the sorting and secretion of proBDNF, such that less regulated (activity dependent) secretion is likely to occur in carriers of at least one ‘Met’ allele [27]. In spite of the ample evidences, inconsistencies persists [28, 29], in conceding the role of BDNF G196A polymorphism with mood disorders, which might also be associated with the lack of statistical power in studies of small sample size, as well as variations across studies in inclusion criteria, such as the definition of psychiatric phenotype [24, 30]. Further, role of sex hormones and various other genetic, hormonal and environmental factors have been implicated in modulating BDNF function [25, 29, 31,32,33,34,35]. Despite a higher risk of depression in Asian and Indian populations [25, 36], extensive studies targeting polymorphisms in BDNF have never been executed in these populations so far.

With the aim to test the hypothesis whether the known polymorphism in two candidate genes:

SLC1A3 (C3590T and C869G) and BDNF (G196A) are associated with stress and depression in adolescent population of eastern Uttar Pradesh (India), a control-case association study has been undertaken.

Methods and materials

Participants

In the present study, a total of 313 adolescent participants aged 16 to19 years were recruited, out of which 205 were controls with no stress and depression and 108 were the cases having variable degrees of both stress and depression. The recruitment of cases were majorly from Sir Sundarlal Hospital, Banaras Hindu University, a few from Deva Clinic, Kamachha, Varanasi and a few schools chosen for this study. All the participants belong to Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Prior to conducting this study approval from ethical committee of Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, was taken. A written informed consent from each participant was obtained prior to conduction of the study. A clinical examination was conducted for all participants by a psychiatrist and followed a questionnaire developed from “Percieved stress scale” (PSS) [37] and “Center for epidemiologic Studies Depression” (CES-D) [38], which had major components including: (a) general information; (b) the chief complain (presenting problem(s) and the context in which they occur); c) past history (medical, personal, family histories and premorbid behaviour) d) mental status examination, e) diagnosis according to DSM-5 guidelines [39] and lastly f) treatment plan for the diagnosis of stress and depression.

Diagnosis of stress and depression

Detection and diagnosis of stress and depression was done according to DSM-V criteria [39] and screening questionnaires, as well as few semi structured questionnaires were administered on adolescents both for stress (PSS) and depression (CES-D).

Stress: The following criteria were used for diagnosis of stress: less/no control over irritation, anger on trivial things, unexpected circumstances makes individual upset, coping failure at work/ home or both, work overload, feeling of being subordinate, feeling nervous /stressed. The scores obtained on these points were computed using standard protocol.

Depression: Clinical depression was diagnosed by a psychiatrist which had the following criteria: Loss/ no interest in work, activity level decreased, increased thoughts of guilt/ worthlessness, disturbed appetite (reduced or increased), sleep duration (reduced or increased), energy levels of body (reduced or increased); impaired/ low concentration, irritable mood and suicidal thoughts or attempts of suicide. The severity level on these parameters was used to calculate the disease-score for each of the participants.

Isolation of DNA from saliva

Saliva samples of participating adolescents were collected in sterilized vials in 1X phosphate buffered saline and then kept in − 70 °C till use. The samples were then thawed, vortexed and pelleted down by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, cells were digested by SDS proteinase K treatment at 65 °C and DNA isolation was done following phenol chloroform extraction method as per standard protocol and precipitation by ethanol. DNA was air dried at 37 °C, dissolved in 25 μl of 1XTris-EDTA (pH =8.0) and was stored at 10 °C. Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Thermofisher®, USA) was used to check the quality and quantity of DNA.

Genotyping through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by restriction digestion

Primer 3 (v.0.4.0) (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/primer3/) and Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) tools were used to design region specific primers. In PCR, denaturation was done at 95 °C, primers were annealed at temperatures accordingly (see Table 1) and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s, this cycle was repeated for 35 cycles. Final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 3 to 5 min as required, in thermocycler (ABI, Veriti, ABI®, CA, USA). Negative template control was taken without DNA for ensuring no contamination. The PCR products were checked on 2% agarose gel to ensure correct amplicon size. Desired endonucleases as NlaIII (NEB®, CA, USA) for BDNF G196A, PflF1(NEB®, CA, USA) for SLC1A3 C3590T and BstU1(NEB®, CA, USA) for SLC1A3 G869C were used for digestion of PCR products for genotyping as indicated in Table 2. After digestion the reaction was stopped by adding1μl 0.5 N EDTA and finally the digested products were checked on 4% agarose gel by electrophoresis.

Table 1 Primers used for detecting SNPs in BDNF and SLC1A3 gene with optimized temperatures and product size
Table 2 Amplicon size, restriction endonucleases used and allele wise expected size of fragments after restriction digestion for the three SNPs studied

Statistical analysis

Analysis of genotype frequencies and allelic frequencies of two polymorphisms of SLC1A3 C3590T and SLC1A3 G869C and single polymorphism of BDNF G196A, in cases and controls were done separately, to test whether the genotypes are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium or not (p value > 0.05). For statistical significance between genotypic and allelic distribution, Chi-square test and correlation matrix, were calculated between various factors. The analysis was done in the form of frequency tables, contingency table analysis using SPSS version 20 (IBM®, Armonk, NY, USA). Odds ratio was calculated to describe the (approximate) increase in risk associated with the non-reference genotype compared to the reference genotype and 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using GraphPadInStat version 3.0. Throughout analysis, p value of < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

Results

Association of SLC1A3 C3590T (rs 2269272) polymorphism with stress and depression

The amplicon of SLC1A3 covering C3590T after digestion with the restriction endonuclease, PflF1, produce two fragments of DNA of 157 bp and 75 bp. But a substitution of T in place of C, causes loss of restriction site and thus single band of (full sized amplicon) 232 bp is obtained. Heterozygotes, on the other hand, shows three bands of 232, 157 and 75 bp (Fig. 1). Table 3 summarizes genotypic distribution of SLC1A3 C3590T in both cases and controls. Statistically significant difference was observed between cases and controls where the frequencies of CC, CT, TT were 46.3, 50.9 and 2.8%, respectively, for cases and 63.4, 33.7 and 2.9%, respectively, for controls (p = 0.0115, χ2 = 8.934). The genotypic distribution in different groups according to three different models of association were analyzed, out of which significant differences in genotypic distributions was exhibited by dominant (CT + TT vs. CC) (p = 0.0052, χ2 = 7.796) and co-dominant models (CT vs. CC) (p = 0.0042, χ2 = 8.205), whereas the p value obtained in the recessive model by Fisher exact test (TT vs. CT + CC) (p = 1.0000) and additive model (TT vs. CC) (p = 0.7122) were not significant. Following the co-dominant model, the CT genotype showed two folds higher risk of developing stress and depression (OR = 2.072, CI 1.28–3.35) compared to the CC genotype, while, the dominant model showed that the CT and TT genotype collectively imposed two times higher risk of stress compared to the CC genotype (OR = 2.011, CI 1.25–3.23). However, distribution of C and T alleles in cases and controls were significantly different (C allele 0.72 in cases vs 0.80 in control and T allele 0.28 in cases vs 0.20 in control) as depicted in Table 3 (p = 0.0159, χ2 = 5.807). The SLC1A3 C3590T is not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, indicating that the allele frequency may increase or decrease with time.

Fig. 1
figure1

Restriction digestion by PflF1 of SLC1A3 C3590T amplicon of representative individuals. The amplicon of SLC1A3 C3590T after digestion with the restriction endonuclese, PflF1, in normal condition (i.e when C is present at 3590 position) shows two fragments of DNA, 157 and 75 bp (lane 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10). A substitution of T in place of C, causes loss of restriction site and only one band of 232 bp (full sized amplicon; lane 5) is obtained. Heterozygotes on the other hand shows three bands of 232, 157 and 75 bp (lane 2, 8, 9, 11, 12)

Table 3 Genotypic distribution of SLC1A3 C3590T (rs 2,269,272) in relation with Stress and Depression

SLC1A3 C869G (rs137852619) polymorphism analysis in stress and depression

In SLC1A3 C869G, the amplicon normally has ‘G’ at 869th position which is not recognized by restriction endonuclease, BstU1 and the full amplicon of 223 bp is expected after electrophoresis. But if ‘C’ is substituted in place of G, then a restriction site is created and 2 bands of 152 and 71 bp size are obtained; and the heterozygote shows three bands of 223, 152 and 71 bp. This polymorphism was not found in the present population under study so a full length amplicon of 223 bp was obtained (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Restriction digestion by BstU1 of SLC1A3 C869G amplicon of representative individuals. This polymorphism was not found in the cohort of individuals selected and a full length amplicon of 223 bp, is seen in all the lanes. The cases and controls with reference to stress and depression showed no heterozygotes in control as well cases

Association of BDNF G196A (rs6265) polymorphism with stress and depression

The genotypic distribution of BDNF G196A in both cases with stress and depression and normal controls is as shown in Table 4. BDNF G196A normally has G at 196th position which is not recognised by its restriction enzyme (Nla III) and cuts at 273rd position forming normal signal peptide and mature BDNF (two fragments amplicon 216 and 58 bp). But when there is substitution of A at 196 position, a new restriction site is created, therefore cut position is at 196th and 273rd positions producing 139, 77 and 58 bps fragments. Heterozygotes having both types of allele shows four fragments of 216, 139, 77 and 58 bps (Fig. 3). Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was calculated for BDNF G196A was found to be in equilibrium. The allelic frequencies showed uniformity in both cases and controls (G allele 0.80 in cases vs 0.79 in control and A allele 0.20 in cases vs 0.21 in control). Our data revealed lack of significant differences in GG, GA, AA: 64.8, 30.6 and 4.6%, respectively, for cases and 63.4, 31.2 and 5.4%, respectively, for controls. The distribution of the G and A alleles in cases and controls was not significantly different showing no association with stress and depression as depicted in Table 4 (p = 0.7534, χ2 = 0.0987).

Table 4 Genotypic distribution of BDNF G196A (rs6265) in relation with stress and depression (case) and unstressed (control)
Fig. 3
figure3

Restriction digestion of BDNF G196A amplicon by NlaIII of representative individuals. The amplicon after digestion in normal condition (i.e. in presence of major allele G) N = major allele (homozygotes) which gives two bands of 216 and 58 bp (Lane 1, 3, 7, 9, 10); A substitution of A in place of G creates new restriction site, so Mut = minor allele (homozygotes) giving three bands of 139, 77 and 58 bp (lane 2) and Heterozygotes having both types of alleles forms 4 bands Het = heterozygotes, which give four bands of 216, 139, 77 and 58 bp (lane 4, 5, 6)

Discussion

The present study focuses on association of SLC1A3 C3590T, C869G and BDNF G196A in case control studies with stress and depression in an eastern Indian population. Association with stress and depression was observed only in T allele of SLC1A3 C3590T in a cohort from an eastern region of India (eastern Uttar Pradesh), suggesting that the minor allele (T) in SLC1A3 C3590T may contribute to the risk of stress and depression together.

SLC1A3 gene in normal condition makes a protein called excitatory amino acid transporter 1 (EAAT1) expressed on mainly astrocyte membrane and involved in regulating excess glutamate concentration, which is found in synaptic spaces after synaptic transmission. EAAT1 is found throughout the brain, most abundantly in parts in connection to spinal cord (brain stem) and cerebellum (co-ordinates movements).

Since SLC1A3 forms a glial high-affinity glutamate transporter (GLAST) molecule regulating glutamate concentration after synaptic transmission, its anomalous expression may impair reuptake of glutamate, leading to prolonged synaptic activation and cytotoxicity in neurons and glial [40]. On the other hand as stated above, SLC1A3 is down-regulated in MDD (Major depressive disorder) patients, also reduced expression of SLC1A3 gene has been observed in suicidal behaviour [41, 42]. In the present study, 3’UTR polymorphism (C3590T) is associated with stress as well as depression. Frequencies of CC genotype of SLC1A3 C3590T were significantly higher in controls (63.4%) than in cases (46.3%). Calculations based on dominant model in Table 3 revealed that individuals with the CT and TT genotypes collectively showed more than two folds higher risk of developing stress and depression compared to those with CC genotype. Also, similar evidence is found from the co-dominant model, where CT genotype confers 2.072 fold higher risk of developing stress. Table 3 also shows that the frequency of C allele is much lower in cases (0.72) than in controls (0.80). The frequency of TT genotype and the minor allele frequency (MAF) of T allele (0.20) in our control group are also similar to those reported in previous studies with reference to depression and in other psychiatric disorders conducted in different populations [16, 43]. However, the frequencies of the CC genotype and C allele are lower in cases than in the control group and this is the first report of this polymorphism in Indian population. It can be hypothised that the 3’UTR polymorphism may decrease protein translation without change in protein conformation.

SLC1A3 C869G, a missense SNP, is known to be pathogenic and mutation in this gene has been found to cause episodic ataxia type 6 [44]. This change from C to G, replacing amino acid proline to arginine at 290 position (P290R), impairs EAAT1 to remove glutamate from synaptic cleft. This impairment may overexcite certain neurons disrupting normal communication within neurons, which is visualised as uncoordinated movement in individuals with episodic ataxia. But the molecular mechanism in this is unknown, however in the present study SLC1A3 C869G was not found to be associated with either stress or depression.

In a study by Bechtholt-Gompf [10] on rats it was shown that disruption of glutamate uptake from the synapse was linked to reduced sensitivity to reward, showing symptoms of depression. In another study on human autopsy samples, it was found that AMPA receptors (glutamate receptor) in anterior cingulated cortex were increased in major depressive disorder [45]. In an animal model study it was found that, mice knockout for AMPA subunit-1 showed higher helplessness, decrease in serotonin and nor-epinephrine levels and disturbed glutamate homeostasis. All these results establish that deregulated glutamate homeostasis leads to disruption of many functions and may lead to depression, too.

A support of our observation comes from a family based study by Turic et al. in 2005 conducted on Caucasian samples, that found significant association of T allele of SLC1A3 (C3590T) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [43]. The association of the same polymorphism was also later shown by Murphy et al. [16] in suicidal victims where SLC1A3 expression was shown to be highly reduced [15]. In the present study the ‘T’ allele was associated with stress and depression, whereas the C allele (major allele) acts as a protective allele. Therefore, it could be speculated that like in suicidal victims, in the above study also due to presence of T allele, the expression of the gene was reduced predisposing the individuals for stress and/or depression. On the other hand a study done on samples from South Korea on mood disorder by Choi et al. [46], did not find association of suicidal behaviour with this polymorphism.

BDNF is the most studied gene, which is shown to be associated with many different mental disorders and is known to interact with various developmental pathways [47]. The trafficking and localization of BDNF appears to be controlled by its pro-domain. A SNP in the pro-domain of BDNF, converts the 66th amino acid valine into methionine (Val66Met) which affects dendritic trafficking and synaptic localization of BDNF as well as impairs its secretion. Human subjects carrying the Val66Met SNP exhibit deficits in short-term episodic memory and show abnormal hippocampal activation.

BDNF G196A polymorphism reduces the expression of the gene and activates apoptotic pathway [48, 49] and in other populations as US Caucasians, American Indian, African American, Chinese a significant association of this polymorphism was shown with depression cases [50,51,52] and several psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, depression, schizophrenia, psychosis and eating disorder [36, 53]. BDNF G196A, “A” (minor allele) has been considered as the risk factor because this minor allele carriers have a reduced activity dependent secretion of BDNF [29, 54]. However G allele (major allele) has been reported to be associated with bipolar disorder [55, 56] and substance use [57, 58] with increased BDNF activity [59,60,61,62]. Also, in Mexican- American population GG genotype (Val homozygote) has been found to be associated with increased chance of depression [63]. A meta-analysis on different ethnic groups performed by Li et al. [31] found significant association of G allele with bipolar in Europeans but not in Asians. And allele A carriers show an increased propensity towards Parkinson’s disease in Europeans but not in Asians. However, a positive association was found with suicidal behaviour in Asians, Caucasians but not in Europeans. But contrary to this, in the present study no association of G196A was found with stress and depression. In the present study, interestingly the frequencies of AA (minor allele of BDNF G196A) was more in controls than in cases, however the χ2 = 0.0987 was not significant, although, it is known that BDNF G196A allele A have a variable frequency ranging between 0% in Africa upto72% in Asia [30]. This allelic frequency distribution in eastern Indian population may be of significance and needs a wider study. Further GWAS studies in recent years have identified several genetic loci but did not find any association of BDNF G196A with stress and depression [29].

Conclusion

We conclude that SLC1A3 C3590T (rs2269272) polymorphism is associated with stress and depression in eastern Indian population studied (p = 0.0042, OR = 2.072). This allele increases the risk by two folds for stress and depression in the present population, therefore presence of this allele in an individual may predict the development of stress and depression in future. This knowledge may also help in development of drug for those having this allele and may also help in the understanding of pathophysiology of the disease and identification of better drug.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets analysed throughout the present study are available in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The dataset(s) supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

Abbreviations

BDNF:

Brain derived neurotrophic factor

SLC1A3:

Solute Carrier Family 1 Member 3 (sodium dependent, high affinity amino acid transporter)

PSS:

Percieved stress scale

CES-D:

Center for epidemiologic Studies Depression

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

SNP:

Single Nucleotide polymorphism

SLC1:

Solute Carrier Family 1 (glutamate/neutral aminoacid transporter family)

EAAT:

Excitatory amino acid transporters

AMPA:

α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (glutamate receptor)

NMDA:

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (inotropic glutamate receptor)

GWAS:

Genome-Wide Association Studies

tSNARE1:

t-SNARE domain containing 1

SLC1A2:

Solute Carrier Family 1 Member 2 (glial glutamate transporter)

SLC17A7:

Solute Carrier Family 17 Member 7 (sodium dependent inorganic phosphate co-transporter)

UTR:

Untranslated region

Val66Met:

Valine to methionine at codon 66

Met:

Methionine

Val:

Valine

DSM-5:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition

°C:

Degree Celcius

μl:

microliter

rpm:

revolutions per minute

min:

minute

sec:

second

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EDTA:

Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

bp:

base pairs

GLAST:

Glial high-affinity glutamate transporter

MDD:

Major depressive disorder

MAF:

Minor allele frequency

ADHD:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

References

  1. 1.

    Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature. 1936;138:32. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.10.2.230a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Khan S, Khan RA. Chronic stress leads to anxiety and depression. Ann Psychiatry Mental Health. 2017;5:1091.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Santrock JW. Adolescence. McGraw Hill 11th Ed; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1552–62. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1552.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Neale MC, Prescott CA. Genetic risk factors for major depression in men and women: similar or different heritabilities and same or partly distinct genes. Psychol Med. 2001;31:605–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291701003907.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner CO, Pedersen NL. A Swedish national twin study of lifetime major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:109–14. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kristensen AS, Andersen J, Jorgensen TN, Sorensen L, Eriksen J, Loland CJ, et al. SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters: structure, function and regulation. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:585–640. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.108.000869.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rothman DL, Behar KL, Hyder F, Shulman RG. In vivo NMR studies of the glutamate neurotransmitter flux and neuroenergetics: implications for brain function. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65:401–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mathews DC, Henter ID, Zarate CA Jr. Targeting the glutamatergic system to treat major depressive disorder: rationale and progress to date. Drugs. 2012;72:1313–33. https://doi.org/10.2165/11633130-000000000-00000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bechtholt-Gompf AJ, Walther HV, Adams MA, Carlezon WA Jr, Ongur D, Cohen BM. Blockade of astrocytic glutamate uptake in rats induces signs of anhedonia and impaired spatial memory. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;35:2049. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ripke S, Wray NR, Lewis CM, Hamilton SP, Weissman MM, Breen G, et al. A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:497–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sleiman P, Wang D, Glessner J, Hadley D, Gur RE, Cohen N, et al. GWAS meta analysis identifies tSNARE1 as a novel schizophrenia/bipolar susceptibility locus. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3075. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Su PH, Gasic M, Mrksic N, Rojas-Barahona L, Ultes S, Vandyke D, et al. Continuously learning neural dialogue management. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02689. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    O’Dushlaine C, Kenny E, Heron E, Donohoe G, Gill M, Morris D, et al. Molecular pathways involved in neuronal cell adhesion and membrane scaffolding contribute to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder susceptibility. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:286–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Medina A, Burke S, Thompson RC, Bunney W Jr, Myers RM, Schatzberg A, et al. Glutamate transporters: a key piece in the glutamate puzzle of major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1150–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Murphy TM, Ryan M, Foster T, Kelly C, McClelland R, O’Grady J, Brown K. Risk and protective genetic variants in suicidal behaviour: association with SLC1A2, SLC1A3, 5-HTR1B and NTRK2 polymorphism. Behav Brain Func. 2011;7:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7-22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kao CF, Fang YS, Zhao Z, Kuo PH. Priortization and evaluation of depression candidate genes by combining multi-dimentional data resources. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018696.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Duman RS. Pathophysiology of depression: the concept of synaptic plasticity. Eur Psychiatry. 2002;17(Suppl 3):306–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(02)00654-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Warner-Schmidt JL, Duman RS. Hippocampal neurogenesis: opposing effects of stress and antidepressant treatment. Hippocampus. 2006;16:239–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Neeley EW, Berger R, Koenig JI, Leonard S. Prenatal stress differentially alters BDNF expression and signaling across rat strains. Neuroscience. 2011;187:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.065.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:677–736. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lu B. Pro-region of neurotrophins: role in synaptic modulation. Neuron. 2003;39:735–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00538-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Notaras M, van den Buuse M. Neurobiology of BDNF in fear memory, sensitivity to stress, and stress-related disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0639-2.

  24. 24.

    Mandelman SD, Grigorenko EL. BDNF Val66Met and cognition: all, none, or some? A meta-analysis of the genetic association. Genes, Brain Behav. 2012;11:127–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00738.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gonzalez-Castro TB, Salas-Magana M, Juarez-Rojop IE, Lopez-Narvaez ML, Tovilla-Zarate CA, Hernandez-Diaz Y. Exploring the association between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and suicidal behavior: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;94:208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachanna BS, Bertolino A, et al. The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell. 2003;112:257–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00035-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shimizu E, Hashimoto K, Iyo M. Ethnic difference of the BDNF 196G/a (val66met) polymorphism frequencies: the possibility to explain ethnic mental traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004;126B:122–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.20118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gyekis JP, Yu W, Dong S, Wang H, Qian J, Kota P. No association of genetic variants in BDNF with major depression: a meta- and gene-based analysis. Amm J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013;162B:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32122.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tsai S-J. Critical issues in BDNF Val66Met genetic studies of neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Petryshen TL, Sabeti PC, Aldinger KA, Fry B, Fan JB, Schaffner SF. Population genetic study of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:810–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li M, Chang H, Xiao X. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and bipolar disorder in European populations: a risk association in case-control, family-based and GWAS studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:218–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chan CB, Ye K. Sex differences in brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling and functions. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23863.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wei SM, Baller EB, Kohn PD, Kippenhan JS, Kolachana B, Soldin SJ, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met genotype and ovarian steroids interactively modulate working memory-related hippocampal function in women: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;23:1066–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhao M, Chen L, Yang J, Han D, Fang D, Qiu X, et al. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, life stress and depression: a meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction. J Affect Disord. 2017;227:226–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Baker E, Schmidt KM, Sims R, O’donovan MC, Williams J, Holmans P, et al. POLARIS: polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data. Genet Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hong CJ, Liou YJ, Tsai SJ. Effects of BDNF polymorphisms on brain function and behavior in health and disease. Brain Res Bull. 2011;86:287–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.08.019..

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:386–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Choudary PV, Molnar M, Evans SJ, Tomita H, Li JZ, Vawter MP, et al. Altered cortical glutamatergic and GABAergic signal transmission with glial involvement in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15653–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507901102.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Coyle JT, Schwarcz R. Mind glue: implications of glial cell biology for psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:90–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.1.90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kim S, Choi KH, Baykiz AF, Gershenfeld HK. Suicide candidate genes associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: an exploratory gene expression profiling analysis of post-mortem prefrontal cortex. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Turic D, Langley K, Williams H, Norton N, Williams NM, Moskvina V, et al. A family based study implicates solute carrier family 1-member 3 (SLC1A3) gene in attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psych. 2005;57:1461–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.025.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hotzy J, Schneider N, Kovermann P, Fahlke C. Mutating a conserved proline residue within the trimerization domain modifies Na+ binding to excitatory amino acid transporters and associated conformational changes. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:36492–501. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.489385.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gibbons RD, Hur K, Brown CH, Davis JM, Mann JJ. Benefits from antidepressants: synthesis of 6-week patient-level outcomes from double-bling placebo-controlled randomized trials of fluoxetine and venlafaxine. Arch Gen Psych. 2012;69:572–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2044.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Choi HY, Kim GE, Kong KA, Lee YJ, Lim WJ, Park SH, et al. Psychological and genetic risk factors associated with suicidal behavior in Korean patients with mood disorders. J Affect Disord. 2018;235:489–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Maheu ME, Ressler KJ. Developmental pathway genes and neural plasticity underlying emotional learning and stress-related disorders. Learn Mem. 2017;24:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.044271.116.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gentry JJ, Barker PA, Carter BD. The p75 neurotrophin receptor: multiple interactors and numerous functions. Prog Brain Res. 2004;146:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(03)46002-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Teng HK, Teng KK, Lee R, Wright S, Tevar S, Almeida RD, Kraemer RT. Pro-BDNF induces neuronal apoptosis via activation of a receptor complex of p75NTR and sortilin. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5455–63. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5123-04.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jiang X, Xu K, Hobabman J, Tian F, Marko AJ, Waheed JF, et al. BDNF variation and mood disorders: a novel functional promoter polymorphism and Val66Met are associated with anxiety but have opposing effects. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;30:1353. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chen ZY, Jing D, Bath KG, Ieraci A, Khan T, Siao CJ, et al. Genetic variant BDNF (Val66Met) polymorphism alters anxiety-related behaviour. Science. 2006;314:140–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129663.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hwang JP, Tsai SJ, Hong CJ, Yang CH, Lirng JF, Yang YM. The Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic-factor gene is associated with geriatric depression. Neurobiol Ageing. 2006;27:1834–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.10.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Notaras M, Hill R, Van Den BM. The BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism as a modifier of psychiatric disorder susceptibility: progress and controversy. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:916–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jin P, Andiappan AK, Quek JM, Lee B, Au B, Sio YY, et al. A functional brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene variant increases the risk of moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:1486.e8–93.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1870.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Neves-Pereira M, Mundo E, Muglia P, King N, Macciardi F, Kennedy JL. The brain derived neurotrophic factor gene confers susceptibility to bipolar disorder: evidence from a family-based association study. Amm J Hum Genet. 2002;71:651–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/342288.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sklar P, Gabriel SB, Mcinnis MG, Bennett P, Lim Y, Tsan G. Family-based association study of 76 candidate genes in bipolar disorder: BDNF is a potential risk locus. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7:579–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cheng CY, Hong CJ, Yu YW, Chen TJ, Wu HC, Tsai SJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Val66Met) genetic polymorphism is associated with substance abuse in males. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;140:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.07.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sim MS, Mohamed Z, Hatim A, Rajagopal VL, Habil MH. Association of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Val66Met) genetic polymorphism with methamphetamine dependence in a Malaysian population. Brain Res. 2010;1357:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.053.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tsai SJ. Is autism caused by early hyperactivity of brain-derived neurotrophic factor? Med. Hypotheses. 2005;65:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.01.034.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tsai SJ. TrkB partial agonists: potential treatment strategy for epilepsy, mania, and autism. Med Hypotheses. 2006;66:173–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.05.033.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Tsai SJ. TrkB partial agonists: potential treatment strategy for major depression. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68:674–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.06.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ilchibaeva TV, Tsybko AS, Kozhemyakina RV, Kondaurova EM, Popova NK, Naumenko VS. Genetically defined fear-induced aggression: focus on BDNF and its receptors. Behav Brain Res. 2018;343:102–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.01.034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ribeiro L, Busnello JV, Cantor RM, Whelan F, Whittaker P, Deloukas P. The brain derived neurotrophic factor rs6265 (Val66Met) polymorphism and depression in Mexican-Americans. Neuro Report. 2007;18:1291–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328273bcb0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dau Dayal, a member of our Lab, for his help in preparation of the manuscript, to Dr. Rajiva Raman for discussions at greater depths and to Mr. Anurag, Department of Statistics, for his help in statistical analysis. We also thank all the doctors in the Psychiatry Department who taught MG to handle the patients during sample collection. The CAS in Zoology is acknowledged for fellowship to MG; UGC-UPE and DST-FIST for equipment facilities in Zoology.

Funding

UGC-CAS of Department of zoology, BHU provided research fellowship to MG.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MG collected samples, conducted experiments and drafted the manuscript. AA, the human geneticist, helped throughout in the project and in trouble –shooting as well as interpretation of data. SJ, a professor from Psychology, helped in selecting the questionnaires and in personal data bank preparation, and also provided personal as well as professional assistance during the course of the study. ASS, a psychiatrist, who allowed MG to the clinic for patient samples collections. MGT, Ph. D supervisor, guided MG, provided all the facilities and helped in preparation of the manuscript and revised substantially. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhu G. Tapadia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Banaras Hindu University, prior to initiation of study. Informed written consent was obtained from each of the participant and their parents for the study. The Consent was also taken from the principals of the schools from which the participants were involved.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, M., Ali, A., Joshi, S. et al. SLC1A3 C3590T but not BDNF G196A is a predisposition factor for stress as well as depression, in an adolescent eastern Indian population. BMC Med Genet 21, 53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-020-0993-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Stress
  • Adolescent
  • SLC1A3
  • BDNF
  • Polymorphism
  • India