Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Notch polymorphisms associated with sensitivity of noise induced hearing loss among Chinese textile factory workers

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics201819:168

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-018-0676-8

  • Received: 17 April 2018
  • Accepted: 31 August 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a polygenic disease involving both genetic and environmental factors, and is one of the most important occupational health hazards worldwide. To date, the influence of Notch1 variants on the risk to develop NIHL has not been illuminated. This study was conducted to explore the effects of Notch1 polymorphisms on individual susceptibility to NIHL.

Methods

A total of 2689 industrial workers from one textile factory in east China were recruited to participate in the current study. Venous blood was collected, basic clinical data was obtained by questionnaires and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) tests were conducted by specialist physicians. Next we performed genotyping of three selected SNPs (rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603) in the Notch1 gene in 535 NIHL patients and 535 controls. Subsequently, the main effects of the genotypes and their interactions were evaluated.

Results

Our results revealed that individuals with a GG of rs3124594, TT of rs3124603 (OR = 4.70 and 1.59 respectively) and the haplotype AAC (rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603) (OR = 14.95) were associated with an increased risk of NIHL in our study cohort. Stratified analysis showed that an increased NIHL risk was found in individuals exposed to work related noise for ≤16 years that also had the rs3124594 GG or rs3124603 CT/TT genotype with an OR of 4.20 and 1.73 respectively. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis indicated that rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603 interacted with each other and were related to an increased risk to develop NIHL (OR = 3.60).

Conclusions

The genetic polymorphisms rs3124594 and rs3124603 within the Notch1 gene are associated with an increased risk of NIHL in a Chinese population and could potentially be used as biomarkers for NIHL in noise exposed workers.

Keywords

  • NIHL
  • Notch1
  • Single nucleotide polymorphism
  • Haplotype

Background

Occupational noise is one of the most common occupational hazards affecting the health of industrial workers, and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been the second most frequent form of sensorineural hearing loss after age-related hearing loss worldwide [1]. It has been widely acknowledged that NIHL is a multifactorial disease resulting from the interaction of genetic and environmental factors [2], but the mechanisms of NIHL are not well understood. It is thought that the etiopathogenesis may involve a direct mechanical injury to the structures of the cochlea, inner ear cell apoptosis and necrosis caused by oxidative stress, or metabolic products generated during signal transduction [35]. At present, numerous population-based inherited susceptibility studies have indicated that individuals exhibit variable degrees of NIHL susceptibility, even when exposed to equal noise intensity levels [1, 6]. Previous studies have found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the HSP70, EYA4, CDH23, GRHL2, FOXO3 and DFNA5 genes are associated with genetic susceptibility to NIHL in humans, and may increase or decrease the risk of NIHL [710]. Studies using animal models have also shown that genetic variants contribute to the incidence of NIHL in mice [11, 12]. Therefore, it has been suggested that inherited susceptibility, environmental factors and their interactions may play vital roles in the occurrence and development of NIHL.

The Notch pathway is best known for its critical role in lateral inhibition, and is one of the key signaling pathways that regulate the development of the organ of Corti. It has been recognized that lateral inhibition controls the cell fate determination in the cochlea through Notch pathway regulation [13]. In the mouse, the Notch receptor Notch1 is expressed in the developing cochlea, including the presumptive sensory epithelium, while the Notch ligands Dll1 and Jag2 are expressed in the developing hair cells (HC) [1416]. Loss of either Notch ligand Dll1 or Jag2 in the developing cochlea was found to result in the formation of extra rows of hair cells [17]. Furthermore, there is evidence that neonatal mammalian cochlear supporting cells have the ability to trans-differentiate into new hair cells when the Notch signaling pathway is blocked [18]. In a recent study, the application of gamma-secretase inhibitors that blocks the Notch pathway to noise-damaged cochleas was found to induce the generation of small numbers of new hair cells and led to a partial restoration of hearing, suggesting that the Notch pathway may still be active in the mature cochlea [19]. Furthermore, the loss of responsiveness to inhibition of the Notch pathway was partly induced by the downregulation of Notch receptors and ligands. This downregulation still persisted in the adult animals, even under conditions of noise damage [20]. Taken together, Notch signaling may play a vital role both in maintaining the homeostasis of the cochlear sensory epithelium and the mitotic regeneration of hair cells.

However, associations between noise induced hearing loss and Notch1 SNPs and their functional significance in the Notch1 gene on NIHL have not yet been studied. Literature review indicated that rs3124594 and rs3124599 of Notch1 were reported in previous studies regarding on lung cancer in northeast Chinese [21]. Even through Notch SNPs were mostly reported in cancer, considering the vital functions of Notch1 in hearing maintenance and repair, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in the Notch1 gene may also be associated with the genetic susceptibility to NIHL. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to investigate the associations between three Notch1 SNPs, namely rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603, with the genetic susceptibility of NIHL in noise exposed Chinese workers.

Methods

Subjects

The methods and study subjects have been described in our previous studies [10, 22]. Employees from a single textile factory in eastern China who received annual health examinations performed by the Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control were recruited for our study in 2015. A total of 2689 individuals participated in the health examinations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants at the beginning of the study. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control. The occupational health examination included venous blood collection, a general physical examination and pure-tone audiometry (PTA). During the health examination, personal medical history and use of medical drugs as well as tobacco and alcohol consumption habits were assessed. Exclusion criteria were the presence of diseases that may affect the hearing thresholds (e.g. otitis media, cholesteatoma or ear canal stenosis) and current or former use of ototoxic drugs (e.g. aspirin, quinolones, and aminoglycosides). A total of 2477 subjects met our criteria and were included in the study.

PTA and NIHL assessment

PTA was performed for each participant after a break from noise exposure for over 12 h. The audiometry was conducted by qualified physicians in a soundproof room using a Madsen Voyager 522 audiometer (Madsen, Taastrup, Denmark).

Definitions of NIHL and control subjects

Hearing loss and normal hearing were defined according to the Chinese diagnostic criteria for occupational noise-induced deafness (GBZ 49–2007). In this study, occupational noise exposure was defined as levels of noise exposure (Lex) of at least 85 dB (A) during a nominal 8-h working day. Hearing loss was identified using binaural hearing thresholds that exceed 25 dB at both high (3000, 4000, 6000 Hz) and voice (500, 1000, 2000 Hz) frequencies. Normal hearing was identified by binaural hearing thresholds below 25 dB both at high and voice frequencies. Hearing thresholds were determined by PTA. The subjects were divided into two groups: NIHL patients (noise-exposed individuals with hearing loss) and control individuals (noise-exposed individuals with normal hearing). In total 535 NIHL patients were identified, and 535 controls matched for age, sex and intensity of noise exposure [23] were selected from the control group.

DNA extractions

Peripheral blood (3 mL) was collected in ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and taken for DNA isolation and genotyping. DNA was extracted from blood samples of subjects by using the QIAcube HT and QIAamp 96 DNA QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at − 20 °C until use.

SNP selection and genotyping

Target SNPs in the Notch1 genes were selected on the basis of the 1000 Genomes Project database and previous reports from the literature [24]. SNPs were selected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.10 in Han Chinese population. According to the criteria, twelve SNPs were identified. We then excluded SNPs which were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (correlation coefficient R2 > 0.8 by Haploview 4.1 software). In the end, six candidate SNPs that fulfilled the criteria were selected (rs3124594, rs3124599, rs3124603, rs3125003, rs183200349, and rs575858778). Literature review indicated that rs3124594 and rs3124599 of Notch1 were reported in previous studies regarding lung cancer in northeast Chinese [21] and rs3124603 was selected as it was tagSNP.

The genotypes of the selected individuals at each polymorphic site were determined using ABI TaqMan SNP genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and pre-designed commercial genotyping probes and primers. The extracted DNA and genotyping probes and primers were added to the TaqMan universal PCR master mix (Roche, Branchburg, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping was then performed on an ABI 7900 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The results were analyzed using the ABI 7900 system sequence detection software version 1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software (Chicago, IL, USA). Goodness-of-fit χ2 tests were conducted to determine whether the SNPs of the control subjects were in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Categorical variables were presented as percentages, and continuous variables were presented as the mean ± SD. Demographic and genotype information for NIHL cases and controls were compared using the Student’s t-test (for continuous variables) or χ2-test (for categorical variables). The associations between the genotypes of the three polymorphisms and risk of NIHL were estimated by computing odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from unconditional logistic regression analysis with the adjustment for age, sex, as well as tobacco and alcohol consumption habits. Haplotype analysis was performed using the SHEsis platform [25]. All tests were two-sided and P-values were corrected (Pc) by Bonferroni post test, and P < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Demographic characteristics of the study subjects and hardy-Weinberg test of selected SNPs

General demographic and life style features (age, sex, tobacco or alcohol consumption habits, duration of noise-exposed work time and noise intensity) and the high-frequency hearing threshold of the NIHL patients and controls are shown in Table 1. No significant differences between NIHL cases and controls were found regarding the general characteristics (P > 0.05). The average high-frequency hearing threshold was significantly higher in patients with NIHL (35.69 ± 9.92 dB) than for controls (14.01 ± 4.16 dB) (P < 0.001). General information about the selected SNPs and the results of the Hardy-Weinberg test are shown in Table 2. rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603 are located in an intron variant region of Notch1 gene and all selected SNPs have minor allele frequencies ≥5% and are within the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (P > 0.05).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of study subjects

Variables

Cases (n = 535)

Controls (n = 535)

P

n

%

n

%

Age (years)

 Mean ± SD

40.40 ± 6.26

40.20 ± 5.79

0.595a

  ≤ 35

129

24.1

132

24.7

0.921b

 35–45

303

56.6

305

57.0

 

  > 45

103

19.3

98

18.3

 

Sex

 Male

496

92.7

496

92.7

1.000b

 Female

39

7.3

39

7.3

 

Tobacco use

 Now

311

58.1

301

56.3

0.476b

 Ever

11

2.1

17

3.2

 

 Never

213

39.8

217

40.6

 

Alcohol consumption

 Now

219

40.9

223

41.7

0.761b

 Ever

9

1.7

12

2.2

 

 Never

307

57.4

300

56.1

 

Duration of noise exposed work (years)

 Mean ± SD

18.54 ± 7.52

17.99 ± 6.99

0.216a

 16

237

44.3

250

46.7

0.461b

  >  16

298

55.7

285

53.3

 

Noise exposure levels (dB)

 Mean ± SD

87.06 ± 7.69

87.46 ± 7.41

0.382a

 85

243

45.4

232

44.4

0.392b

 85–92

105

19.6

95

18.7

 

  >  92

187

35.0

208

36.9

 

High frequency hearing thresholds (dB)

 Mean ± SD

35.69 ± 9.92

14.01 ± 4.16

< 0.001a

 26

56

10.5

535

100.0

< 0.001b

  > 26

479

89.5

0

0.0

 

aStudents’ t-test

bTwo-sided χ2 test

Table 2

General information of selected SNPs and Hardy-Weinberg test

SNP

Alleles

Chromosome

Functional Consequence

MAF

P for HWE b

Control

Database a

rs3124594

A/G

9:136501956

Intron variant

0.124

0.134

0.562

rs3124599

A/G

9:136509318

Intron variant

0.382

0.390

0.756

rs3124603

C/T

9:136515725

Intron variant

0.110

0.110

1.000

aData from NCBI dbSNP

bP value of Hardy-Weinberg test

Multivariate analyses of Notch1 SNPs with the risk of NIHL

Three Notch1 SNPs were genotyped in 1070 workers exposed to noise (535 NIHL patients and 535 controls). Table 3 shows the results of genotype and allele distributions of rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603 in the codominant, dominant, recessive and allelic model. There were statistically significant differences in the genotype frequencies of rs3124594 and rs3124603 between cases and controls (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively) in the codominant model. In the dominant model, the rs3124594 GG and rs3124603 CT + TT were significantly associated with an increased risk of NIHL (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011 respectively). Subsequent logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, alcohol and tobacco comsumption habits showed that individuals with rs3124594 GG and rs3124603 CT + TT had an increased risk of NIHL (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.74–3.45, OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09–1.94) compared with controls. In the recessive model, the rs3124594 GG + AG (OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.17–15.04) genotypes indicated a significantly increased risk for NIHL (P = 0.019). In the allelic model, the rs3124594 G (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.74–3.29) allele indicated a significantly increased risk for NIHL (P < 0.001). Thus, our data revealed that the Notch1 SNPs rs3124594 and rs3124603 may have a significant association with an increased NIHL susceptibility.
Table 3

Distribution of three polymorphisms and the association with NIHL

Genetic models

Genotypes

Cases

Controls

P a

Adjusted OR

n = 535

%

n = 535

%

(95% CI)b

rs3124594

Codominant

AA

3

0.6

12

2.2

< 0.001

1.00 (Ref.)

 

AG

54

10.1

109

20.4

 

2.02(0.54–7.51)

 

GG

478

89.3

414

77.4

 

4.70(1.31–16.87)

Dominant

AG/AA

57

107.0

121

22.6

< 0.001

1.00 (Ref.)

 

GG

478

89.3

414

77.4

 

2.45(1.74–3.45)

Recessive

AA

3

0.6

12

2.2

0.019

1.00 (Ref.)

 

GG/AG

532

99.4

523

97.8

 

4.19 (1.17–15.04)

Alleles

A

60

5.6

133

12.4

< 0.001

1.00 (Ref.)

 

G

1010

94.4

937

87.6

 

2.39 (1.74–3.29)

rs3124599

Codominant

GG

78

14.6

76

14.2

0.343

1.00 (Ref.)

 

AG

234

43.7

257

48.0

 

0.88 (0.61–1.27)

 

AA

223

41.7

202

37.8

 

1.07 (0.74–1.55)

Dominant

GG/AG

312

58.3

333

62.2

0.190

1.00 (Ref.)

 

AA

223

41.7

202

37.8

 

1.18(0.92–1.51)

Recessive

GG

78

14.6

76

14.2

0.862

1.00 (Ref.)

 

AA/AG

457

85.4

459

85.8

 

0.97 (0.69–1.36)

Alleles

G

390

36.4

409

38.2

0.396

1.00 (Ref.)

 

A

680

63.6

661

61.8

 

1.08 (0.91–1.29)

rs3124603

Codominant

CC

395

73.8

430

80.4

0.003

1.00 (Ref.)

 

CT

134

25.0

92

17.2

 

0.51 (0.19–1.35)

 

TT

6

1.1

13

2.4

 

1.59 (1.18–2.14)

Dominant

CC

395

73.8

430

80.4

0.011

1.00 (Ref.)

 

CT/TT

140

26.2

105

19.6

 

1.46 (1.09–1.94)

Recessive

TT

6

1.1

13

2.4

0.105

1.00 (Ref.)

 

CC/CT

529

98.9

522

97.6

 

2.17 (0.82–5.76)

Alleles

C

924

86.4

952

89.0

0.066

1.00 (Ref.)

 

T

146

13.6

118

11.0

 

1.28 (0.99–1.66)

aTwo-sided χ2 test

bAdjusted for age, sex, alcohol and tobacco consumption habits in logistic regression model

Stratified analyses of rs3124594, rs3124599, and rs3124603 polymorphism and NIHL risk

The impact of the rs3124594, rs3124599, and rs3124603 genotypes in NIHL on several risk characteristics were analyzed using a recessive model. The results are shown in Table 4. In the group with noise exposure of ≤16 years, significant differences were found in the genotype distributions between cases and controls in rs3124594 (OR = 4.20, 95% CI = 2.44–7.24) and rs3124603 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.13–2.66). Individuals exposed to noise for > 16 years with the rs3124594 GG genotype had an increased NIHL risk (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.06–2.63). Furthermore, workers exposed to noise levels of ≤85 dB with the rs3124603 CT/TT genotype, or noise levels of 85-92 dB and the rs3124599 AA genotype or noise levels of > 92 dB and the rs3124594 GG genotype had an increased risk of NIHL (OR = 2.06, 1.59 and 3.29 respectively).
Table 4

Stratified analysis of SNPs in a recessive model

SNPs

Group

Genotype

Duration of noise exposed work (years)

Expose level with noise (dB)

≤ 16

>  16

≤ 85

85–92

>  92

rs3124594

case

GG

217

261

212

96

170

AG/AA

20

37

31

9

17

control

GG

183

231

189

73

152

AG/AA

67

54

43

22

56

P a

 

< 0.001

0.03

0.083

0.004

0.001

Adjusted OR

 

4.20

1.67

1.55

3.29

3.65

(95% CI)b

 

(2.44–7.24)

(1.06–2.63)

(0.94–2.57)

(1.40–7.71)

(2.03–6.57)

rs3124599

case

AA

98

125

97

40

86

AG/GG

139

173

146

65

101

control

AA

102

100

98

32

72

AG/GG

148

185

134

63

136

P a

 

0.902

0.089

0.607

0.516

0.021

Adjusted OR

 

1.05

1.36

0.91

1.29

1.59

(95% CI)b

 

(0.73–1.51)

(0.97–1.90)

(0.63–1.32)

(0.71–2.33)

(1.06–2.39)

rs3124603

case

CT/TT

68

72

70

27

43

CC

169

226

173

78

144

control

CT/TT

47

58

38

21

46

CC

203

227

194

74

162

P a

 

0.010

0.269

0.001

0.551

0.835

Adjusted OR

 

1.73

1.24

2.06

1.19

1.08

(95% CI)b

 

(1.13–2.66)

(0.84–1.84)

(1.32–3.22)

(0.61–2.31)

(0.67–1.75)

aTwo-sided χ2 test

bAdjusted for age, sex, alcohol and tobacco use in a logistic regression model

Association between the haplotypes of Notch1 SNPs with NIHL risk

Furthermore, haplotype frequency analysis of the three SNPs was performed between NIHL cases and controls (Table 5). Four common haplotypes (with a frequency of > 3%) derived from the three SNPs, accounting for 90% of the haplotype variations, were selected, and the other haplotypes were pooled in the mixed group. We found that the haplotype AAC (rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603) in the Notch1 gene was associated with an increased risk of NIHL (OR = 14.95), whereas the haplotype GGC and GGT were associated with a decreased risk for NIHL (OR = 0.11 and 0.02) compared with GAC.
Table 5

Frequencies of inferred haplotypes among the cases and controls and their association with risk of NIHL

Haplotypes a

Case (n = 535*2)

Control (n = 535*2)

P b

Adjusted OR

Global P c

n

%

n

%

(95% CI)

GAC

787

73.6

398

37.2

 

1.00 (Ref.)

< 0.001

GGC

89

8.3

413

38.6

< 0.001

0.11 (0.08–0.14)

 

GGT

7

0.7

221

20.7

< 0.001

0.02 (0.01–0.03)

 

AAC

118

11.0

4

0.4

< 0.001

14.95 (5.48–40.79)

 

Others d

69

6.4

34

3.2

0.972

1.01(0.66–1.55)

 

aThe alleles of haplotypes were arrayed as rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603

bTwo-sided χ2 test

cGenerated by permutation test with 1000 times of simulation

dHaplotypes with a frequency < 0.03 (AAC/AAT/AGT/GAT) were pooled into the mixed group

Comparison of the high-frequency hearing threshold shift in the three SNPs genotypes

The high-frequency hearing threshold shift was compared in the rs3124594, rs3124599, and rs3124603 genotypes in 1070 noise exposed workers (Fig. 1). Individuals with the rs3124594 GG genotype had a significantly higher high-frequency hearing threshold shift than those with the AA or AG genotype (P = 0.018 and < 0.001). Individuals with the CT genotype of rs3124603 were also found to have a higher high-frequency hearing threshold shift than people with CC genotype (P = 0.026).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Comparison of high-frequency hearing threshold shift of all subjects. Comparison of high-frequency hearing threshold shift of rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603 genotypes in all subjects. Data are presented as mean ± SE and analyzed by ANOVA

Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of the interaction between the three SNPs

The results of the MDR analysis of the interaction between the three SNPs are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 2. The interaction results suggest that the rs3124594-rs3124603 and rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603 model was related to an increased risk of NIHL (OR = 3.26 and 3.60, P < 0.0001).
Table 6

MDR analysis results of the interaction between the three SNPs

Model

Training balanced accuracy

Testing balanced accuracy

Cross-validation consistency

P

OR(95%CI)

rs3124594

0.5598

0.5598

10/10

< 0.0001

2.45(1.74–3.45)

rs3124594-rs3124603

0.5683

0.5664

10/10

< 0.0001

3.26(2.23–4.77)

rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603

0.5722

0.5355

10/10

< 0.0001

3.60(2.43–5.34)

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Graph model of the interaction between the three SNPs (a: rs3124594 model, b: rs3124594-rs3124603 model, c: rs3124594-rs3124599-rs3124603 model). Dark gray and light gray boxes presented the high- and low-risk factor combinations, respectively. Left bars within each box represented case while the right bars represented control. The heights of the bars are proportional to the sum of samples in each group

Discussion

SNPs are a common type of genetic variation in the human genome, with about 15 million SNPs among all humans [26]. Haplotype is defined as a specific set of alleles on a single chromosome, or on a part of a chromosome, and has been an important factor in human genetics for decades [27]. Some haplotypes have a particular biological meaning such as the ones derived from SNPs located in the promoters, or the ones derived from non-synonymous SNPs. All these haplotypes are “subhaplotypes”. Using method of subhaplotyping can dramatically reduce the error rate on patient resolutions and haplotypes frequencies and minimise the risk of a false interpretation in genetic studies involving subhaplotypes [28]. The genomic distribution of SNPs is not homogenous; SNPs occur more frequently in the noncoding regions than in the coding regions of genes. At present SNPs are mostly detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis, cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence assays, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis or and allele-specific PCR (TaqMan SNP genotype-PCR).

In the present study, a genetic association analysis was performed on three selected Notch1 SNPs (rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603) in 535 NIHL patients and 535 controls using the TaqMan SNP genotyping assay. We observed that the rs3124594 GG and rs3124603 CT + TT genotype in Notch1 were associated with a significantly higher risk of NIHL. Subsequent haplotype analysis showed that the haplotype AAC (rs3124594, rs3124599 and rs3124603) was associated with an increased risk of NIHL. These findings support our hypothesis that Notch1 polymorphisms may contribute to the susceptibility to NIHL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first association study showing that the Notch1 gene is associated with an increased risk of NIHL in a Chinese population.

All of the three SNPs are located in a noncoding region of the Notch1 gene, which is in line with previous studies that have shown that SNPs in noncoding regions have functional consequences for the regulation of protein-coding genes and lncRNAs [29, 30]. The Notch pathway has a critical role in lateral inhibition, which regulates the cell fate determination in the cochlea [13]. During early embryonic development, inhibition of Notch/JAG2 and DLL1 has been shown to prolong the proliferation process of the prosensory cells in the inner ear [31]. Furthermore, neonatal mammalian cochlear supporting cells were found to have the ability to trans-differentiate into new hair cells when the Notch signaling pathway was blocked. It has been illustrated that, Notch signaling also acts as a negative regulator by inhibiting the proliferation of Lgr5+ progenitors and maintaining the homeostasis of cochlear sensory epithelium on cell numbers [18]. Taken together, this suggests that the noncoding SNPs rs3124594 and rs3124603 may have a significant role in the maintenance and repair of cells required for hearing through protein-coding genes or lncRNA regulation of the Notch pathway.

However, our study has several potential limitations. (a) The sample size of our study was relatively large compared to previous studies. However, due to the low biological effects of an individual SNP, the sample size may not have been sufficient for an appropriate statistical analysis. Therefore, further studies with increased sample size are needed to validate the effect of Notch1 polymorphisms on the risk of NIHL. (b) The study subjects of this case-control study were all Chinese Han people. Therefore our results may only apply to the Chinese Han population; (c) The selected SNPs are noncoding, which is why we assume that these variants are involved in the regulation of protein-coding genes and lncRNA regulation of Notch1.

Conclusions

Here we provide the first piece of evidence illustrating an association between the polymorphisms rs3124594 and rs3124603 in the Notch1 gene and a significantly higher risk of NIHL. These noncoding SNPs may be involved in the regulation of protein-coding genes or of lncRNAs of Notch1. Thus, these findings suggest that the three Notch1 SNPs (rs3124594 and rs3124603) may play an important role in noise induced hearing loss and are potential new biomarkers for NIHL in noise exposed Chinese workers.

Notes

Abbreviations

HC: 

Hair cells

MAF: 

Minor allele frequency

NIHL: 

Noise induced hearing loss

OR: 

Odds ratios

PTA: 

Pure-tone audiometry

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

Declarations

Funding

This research was funded by Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader program (CXTDA2017029), Nanjing Medical Technology Development Funds (YKK16220), Nanjing Medical Science and technique Development Foundation (QRX17197) and Jiangsu Program for Young Medical Talents (QNRC2016528).

These funds were used to collect biological material, epidemiological data and perform SNP genotyping.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ED performed the experiments and wrote the paper. JL and HuS collected the specimens. ED, HZ, WG and HaS statistically analyzed the data. BZ designed the research and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Review Board of the Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control granted ethical clearance for the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, No.172 Jiangsu Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210009, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Nanjing Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Disease, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
(3)
Kunshan Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Kunshan, Jiangsu Province, China

References

  1. Konings A, Van Laer L, Van Camp G. Genetic studies on noise-induced hearing loss: a review. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):151–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlsson PI, Van Laer L, Borg E, Bondeson ML, Thys M, Fransen E, Van Camp G. The influence of genetic variation in oxidative stress genes on human noise susceptibility. Hear Res. 2005;202(1–2):87–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2006;27(1):1–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Le Prell CG, Dolan DF, Schacht J, Miller JM, Lomax MI, Altschuler RA. Pathways for protection from noise induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2003;5(20):1–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Le Prell CG, Yamashita D, Minami SB, Yamasoba T, Miller JM. Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention. Hear Res. 2007;226(1–2):22–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson D, Subramaniam M, Boettcher FA. Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: an old topic revisited. Ear Hear. 1993;14(3):152–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kowalski TJ, Pawelczyk M, Rajkowska E, Dudarewicz A, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. Genetic variants of CDH23 associated with noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(2):358–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang NC, Ho CK, Lin HY, Yu ML, Chien CY, Ho KY. Association of polymorphisms of heat shock protein 70 with susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in the Taiwanese population. Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16(3):168–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang X, Liu Y, Zhang L, Yang Z, Yang L, Wang X, Jiang C, Wang Q, Xia Y, Chen Y, et al. Associations of genetic variations in EYA4, GRHL2 and DFNA5 with noise-induced hearing loss in Chinese population: a case- control study. Environ Health. 2015;14:77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo H, Ding E, Bai Y, Zhang H, Shen H, Wang J, Song X, Cai W, Guo J, Zhu B. Association of genetic variations in FOXO3 gene with susceptibility to noise induced hearing loss in a Chinese population. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. White CH, Ohmen JD, Sheth S, Zebboudj AF, McHugh RK, Hoffman LF, Lusis AJ, Davis RC, Friedman RA. Genome-wide screening for genetic loci associated with noise-induced hearing loss. Mamm Genome. 2009;20(4):207–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis RR, Newlander JK, Ling X, Cortopassi GA, Krieg EF, Erway LC. Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Hear Res. 2001;155(1–2):82–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartman BH, Hayashi T, Nelson BR, Bermingham-McDonogh O, Reh TA. Dll3 is expressed in developing hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(10):2875–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lanford PJ, Lan Y, Jiang R, Lindsell C, Weinmaster G, Gridley T, Kelley MW. Notch signalling pathway mediates hair cell development in mammalian cochlea. Nat Genet. 1999;21(3):289–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang N, Martin GV, Kelley MW, Gridley T. A mutation in the lunatic fringe gene suppresses the effects of a Jagged2 mutation on inner hair cell development in the cochlea. Curr Biol. 2000;10(11):659–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiernan AE, Cordes R, Kopan R, Gossler A, Gridley T. The notch ligands DLL1 and JAG2 act synergistically to regulate hair cell development in the mammalian inner ear. Development. 2005;132(19):4353–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooker R, Hozumi K, Lewis J. Notch ligands with contrasting functions: Jagged1 and Delta1 in the mouse inner ear. Development. 2006;133(7):1277–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li W, Wu J, Yang J, Sun S, Chai R, Chen ZY, Li H. Notch inhibition induces mitotically generated hair cells in mammalian cochleae via activating the Wnt pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(1):166–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mizutari K, Fujioka M, Hosoya M, Bramhall N, Okano HJ, Okano H, Edge AS. Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma. Neuron. 2013;77(1):58–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Maass JC, Gu R, Basch ML, Waldhaus J, Lopez EM, Xia A, Oghalai JS, Heller S, Groves AK. Changes in the regulation of the notch signaling pathway are temporally correlated with regenerative failure in the mouse cochlea. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Quan X, Yin Z, Fang X, Zhou B. Single nucleotide polymorphism rs3124599 in Notch1 is associated with the risk of lung cancer in northeast Chinese non-smoking females. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):31180–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ding E, Liu J, Guo H, Shen H, Zhang H, Gong W, Song H, Zhu B. DNMT1 and DNMT3A haplotypes associated with noise-induced hearing loss in Chinese workers. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12193.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen H, Cao J, Hong Z, Liu K, Shi J, Ding L, Zhang H, Du C, Li Q, Zhang Z, et al. A functional Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1 is associated with noise-induced hearing loss in a Chinese population. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89662.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Genomes Project C, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, Mc Carthy S, Mc Vean GA, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi YY, He L. SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res. 2005;15(2):97–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiang R, Duan J, Windemuth A, Stephens JC, Judson R, Xu C. Genome-wide evaluation of the public SNP databases. Pharmacogenomics. 2003;4(6):779–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. International HapMap C. The international HapMap project. Nature. 2003;426(6968):789–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cédric C, Olivier D, Manon G, Hervé D, Ronald A, Jean-Louis S, Jean-François Z. Computation of haplotypes on SNPs subsets: advantage of the “global method”. BMC Genet. 2006;7(1):50.Google Scholar
  29. Meyer KB, Maia AT, O'Reilly M, Ghoussaini M, Prathalingam R, Porter-Gill P, Ambs S, Prokunina-Olsson L, Carroll J, Ponder BA. A functional variant at a prostate cancer predisposition locus at 8q24 is associated with PVT1 expression. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(7):e1002165.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Guo H, Ahmed M, Zhang F, Yao CQ, Li S, Liang Y, Hua J, Soares F, Sun Y, Langstein J, et al. Modulation of long noncoding RNAs by risk SNPs underlying genetic predispositions to prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2016;48(10):1142–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Takebayashi S, Yamamoto N, Yabe D, Fukuda H, Kojima K, Ito J, Honjo T. Multiple roles of Notch signaling in cochlear development. Dev Biol. 2007;307(1):165–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement