Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in association with diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-017-0458-8

Received: 10 November 2016

Accepted: 24 August 2017

Published: 29 August 2017

Abstract

Background

A large amount of researches have demonstrated that vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms are associated with diabetic nephropathy (DN) risk in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Nevertheless, the results are inconclusive and inconsistent.

Methods

We screened PubMed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Wanfang databases for those relevant studies updated in May 2016.

Results

7 studies involving 2564 subjects were recruited. We evaluated the genotypic and allelic differences between DN patients and DM controls. Overall analysis showed that no significant association was found among the ApaI, BsmI, FokI,TaqI gene polymorphisms and DN susceptibility in diabetic patients (all P values > 0.05). In the stratified analysis, TT genotype was related to DN susceptibility in Asians (TT vs Tt + tt: OR =2.21, 95% CI: 1.05–4.67, p = 0.04). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results in overall populations, Caucasians and Asians were dependable.

Conclusions

No significant association was found among the ApaI, BsmI, FokI, TaqI polymorphisms and DN risk in overall populations, the TaqI variants might related to DN susceptibility in Asians. Further researches are required to testify our meta-analysis.

Keywords

Vitamin D receptorGene polymorphismsDiabetic nephropathyMeta-analysis

Background

The vascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) can lead to high disability rates and mortality rates. Poorly controlled blood glucose leads to the occurrence and development of complications in patients with DM [1]. As one of the most serious diabetic microvascular diseases, diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the main reason of end-stage renal failure(ESRD) [2, 3]. Generally, DN is a multifactorial disease attribute to the interaction of environmental and genetic factors [4, 5]. Several factors always contributing to DN risk include abnormal renal hemodynamic responses, fatty acid metabolism caused by hyperglycemia, hypertension, and abnormal metabolism of vasoactive substances [6]. Recently, genetic predispositions have been found to play a key role in the development and progression of DN [7, 8]. Thus, searching for genetic markers for DN can identify patients who may benefit from prevention.

Previous studies showed that vitamin D endocrine system played an important role in the development of DM [911]. High levels of vitamin D can enhance pancreatic b-cell secretion functions and improve insulin resistance [12, 13]. There are accumulating evidences to suggest that vitamin D participated in a number of diseases such as DM and DN [1416]. An increasing number of researches showed that there was a relationship between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms and DN [17, 18]. Vitamin D exerts its functions by binding to the nuclear or cytosolic VDR, which serves as a transcription activator and is a member of the steroid / thyroid hormone receptor family [17]. At present, the most common studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of VDR are FokI (rs10735810), BsmI (rs1544410), ApaI (rs7975232) and TaqI (rs731236) [19, 20].

To provide an accurate estimation, we operated a systematic review to investigate the relation of DN and the four VDR gene polymorphisms(ApaI, BsmI, FokI and TaqI).

Methods

Search strategy

The related articles were searched from PubMed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Wanfang databases. The The retrieval strategy were as follows: “VDR, vitamin D receptor, diabetic nephropathy (DN), ApaI, BsmI, FokI, TaqI, polymorphism, genotype”. In addition, we retrieved references of selected articles. Here are the inclusion criteria: 1) case-control study; 2)DN as ending; 3) carried out in human population; 4) Clearly define genetic variants of case and control can offer sufficient calculational data. Here are the exclusion criteria: (1) case reports or review articles; (2) articles that did not offer the detailed genotype information; (3) studies on the correlation between DN and other genes; (4) studies investigate the role of VDR genotype in other diseases. The largest or most recent study was selected when continuous or multiple publications that occur under the same search condition [21].

Data extraction

For each study the following information was evaluated independently by two investigators according to the standard protocol:(1) name of first author; (2) year of publication; (3) original country; (4) ethnicity of the subjects; (5) genotype distribution or allele frequencies; and (6) number of cases and controls (Table 1). Genotypes for the VDR gene polymorphisms(ApaI, BsmI, FokI or TaqI) were designated with A, B, F and T for the absence of restriction sites and with a, b, f and t for their presence. In most studies, the ApaI, BsmI, FokI or TaqI genotype and allele frequency of the VDR gene were measured by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). In one study [22], pyrosequencing reactions were performed to determine the BsmI, FokI or TaqI genotype, Taqman 5′-nuclease assays were performed used to determine the ApaI genotype, the labels of FokI (C/T) are correspond to FokI (F/f),BsmI (A/G) are correspond to BsmI (B/b),ApaI (T/G) are correspond to ApaI (A/a),TaqI(T/C) are correspond to TaqI(T/t).
Table 1

Characteristics of the studies evaluating the effects of VDR BsmI,FokI, TaqI and ApaI gene polymorphisms on DN risk

Gene

Author

Ethnicity

Country

Type of DM

Sex

Case

Control

HWE(p)

sites

year

male/female

BsmI

     

BB

Bb

bb

Total

BB

Bb

bb

Total

 
 

Bućan 2009

Caucasian

Croatia

DM1

—/—

1

8

5

14

6

18

9

33

0.566

 

Martin 2009

Caucasian

Ireland

DM1

Case 359/296

106

321

228

655

111

325

238

674

0.998

 

Control 286/388

 

Zhang 2012

Asian

China

DM2

Case 99/83 Control 68/54

3

57

122

182

0

26

96

122

0.188

FokI

     

FF

Ff

ff

Total

FF

Ff

ff

Total

 
 

Li 2005

Asian

China

DM2

30/64

9

17

13

39

28

22

5

55

0.821

 

Bućan 2009

Caucasian

Croatia

DM1

—/—

4

6

4

14

9

18

6

33

0.566

 

Martin 2009

Caucasian

Ireland

DM1

Case 359/296 Control 286/388

248

323

84

655

262

311

101

674

0.580

 

Vedralová 2012

Caucasian

Czech

DM1/2

Case 75/57 Control 94/76

63

58

11

132

57

85

28

170

0.696

TaqI

     

TT

Tt

tt

Total

TT

Tt

tt

Total

 
 

Bućan 2009

Caucasian

Croatia

DM1

—/—

5

6

3

14

13

14

6

33

0.522

 

Martin 2009

Caucasian

Ireland

DM1

Case 359/296 Control 286/388

103

327

225

655

98

327

249

674

0.575

 

Nosratabadi 2010

Asian

Iran

DM2

Case 38/62 Control 41/59

9

55

36

100

4

63

33

100

0

 

Han 2015

Asian

China

DM2

150/138

102

6

0

108

160

16

4

180

0

ApaI

     

AA

Aa

aa

Total

AA

Aa

aa

Total

 
 

Martin 2009

Caucasian

Ireland

DM1

Case 359/296 Control 286/388

185

323

147

655

200

322

152

674

0.303

 

Nosratabadi 2010

Asian

Iran

DM2

Case 38/62 Control 41/59

9

64

27

100

9

63

28

100

0.002

 

Zhang 2012

Asian

China

DM2

Case 99/83 Control 68/54

19

89

74

182

11

65

46

122

0.075

 

Han 2015

Asian

China

DM2

150/138

2

50

56

108

18

80

82

180

0.814

Statistical analysis

The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the association among the four VDR gene polymorphisms and DN risk. Statistical analysis were divided into Caucasian and Asian populations in subgroup analysis. The Chi-square based Q-statistic test was used to assess the heterogeneity between the studies. P < 0.10 indicated there is a significant heterogeneity among the studies. If the P value was no more than 0.1, pooled OR was estimated using a random-effect model using the DerSimonian and Laird method (D + L), otherwise a fixed-effect model using the Mantel–Haenszel (M–H) method was carried out. The asymmetry funnel plots were used to estimate the publication bias. The exact test was carried out to assess whether the genotype distribution in control population were accord with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) expectations. A sensitivity analysis of the overall population was used by omitting one study in each turn. Cochrane Review Manager Version 5.1 (Cochrane Library, Oxford, UK) was used to performed the statistical analyses. All the P values were double tailed test and the significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the studies

The search yielded 67 articles, 7 studies [18, 2227] contain 1230 DN patients and 1334 diabetic controls were finally recruited into our meta-analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all studies reporting the association among ApaI, BsmI, FokI, TaqI of VDR gene polymorphisms and DN susceptibility (Fig. 1). The main characteristics of these selected studies were summarized in Table 1, including the first author’s name, year of publication, original country and genotype distribution.
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of included and excluded studies

Quantitative data synthesis

It has been shown in Table 2 that the risk for DN conferred by VDR gene polymorphisms did not show significant difference in the overall 7 studies (all P values >0.05) (Figs. 234 and 5).In the stratified analysis, there was a relationship between TT genotype and DN risk in Asians in only two studies of 488 patients(TT vs Tt + tt: OR =2.21, 95% CI: 1.05–4.67, p = 0.04), however, p value equals to 0.04 seems not enough to support relationship between genetic variant and diabetic nephropathy. Besides, there was no significant correlation between other three polymorphisms and DN risk in Asians and Caucasians(Table 2). Altogether, the results of the meta-analysis can be described as negative. Particularly worth mentioning is that only one published study in Asian populations was included in the BsmI and FokI groups, the subgroup for Asians might not be reliable in these two groups. Two studies [24, 27] were excluded because the genotype distributions in controls were obviously deviated from the HWE. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were dependable for overall populations, Caucasians and Asians.
Table 2

Meta analysis of the association of VDR BsmI,FokI, TaqI and ApaI gene polymorphisms with DN risk

Genetic

Group and

Studies

Q test p

Model

OR(95%CI)

p

contrasts

subgroups

number

value

selected

BsmI

B vs b

Overall

3

0.06

Random

1.13 [0.72, 1.75]

0.60

 

Caucasian

2

0.39

Fixed

0.99 [0.85, 1.16]

0.93

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

1.75 [1.08, 2.86]

0.02

BB vs Bb + bb

Overall

3

0.38

Fixed

0.98 [0.74, 1.30]

0.89

 

Caucasian

2

0.36

Fixed

0.96 [0.72, 1.28]

0.77

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

4.78 [0.24, 93.31]

0.30

bb vs BB + Bb

Overall

3

0.11

Random

0.84 [0.53, 1.33]

0.45

 

Caucasian

2

0.55

Fixed

0.99 [0.79, 1.24]

0.93

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

0.55 [0.32, 0.94]

0.03

FokI

F vs f

Overall

4

0.0001

Random

0.88 [0.52, 1.48]

0.62

 

Caucasian

3

0.04

Random

1.19 [0.81, 1.73]

0.38

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

0.33 [0.18, 0.61]

0.0004

FF vs Ff + ff

Overall

4

0.004

Random

0.92 [0.50, 1.71]

0.80

 

Caucasian

3

0.05

Random

1.24 [0.74, 2.05]

0.41

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

0.29 [0.12, 0.72]

0.008

ff vs FF + Ff

Overall

4

0.005

Random

1.18 [0.52, 2.72]

0.69

 

Caucasian

3

0.18

Fixed

0.78 [0.59, 1.03]

0.08

 

Asian

1

-

Fixed

5.00 [1.61, 15.56]

0.005

TaqI

T vs t

Overall

4

0.20

Fixed

0.96 [0.84, 1.11]

0.62

 

Caucasian

2

0.89

Fixed

0.92 [0.79, 1.08]

0.30

 

Asian

2

0.09

Random

1.46 [0.63, 3.38]

0.37

TT vs Tt + tt

Overall

4

0.15

Fixed

0.97 [0.79, 1.20]

0.77

 

Caucasian

2

0.95

Fixed

0.89 [0.71, 1.11]

0.31

 

Asian

2

0.89

Fixed

2.21 [1.05, 4.67]

0.04

tt vs TT + Tt

Overall

4

0.68

Fixed

1.08 [0.83, 1.40]

0.56

 

Caucasian

2

0.89

Fixed

1.10 [0.82, 1.48]

0.52

 

Asian

2

0.22

Fixed

1.01 [0.58, 1.77]

0.97

ApaI

A vs a

Overall

4

0.44

Fixed

0.94 [0.83, 1.07]

0.35

 

Caucasian

1

-

Fixed

0.97 [0.84, 1.13]

0.73

 

Asian

3

0.33

Fixed

0.89 [0.72, 1.10]

0.26

AA vs Aa + aa

Overall

4

0.14

Fixed

0.89 [0.72, 1.11]

0.31

 

Caucasian

1

-

Fixed

0.93 [0.74, 1.18]

0.57

 

Asian

3

0.06

Fixed

0.73 [0.43, 1.23]

0.24

aa vs AA + Aa

Overall

4

0.79

Fixed

1.06 [0.87, 1.28]

0.58

 

Caucasian

1

-

Fixed

0.99 [0.77, 1.29]

0.96

 

Asian

3

0.75

Fixed

1.14 [0.85, 1.53]

0.37

Fig. 2

Association of VDR BsmI gene polymorphism(B vs b)with DN susceptibility in overall populations

Fig. 3

Association of VDR FokI gene polymorphism(F vs f) with DN susceptibility in overall populations

Fig. 4

Association of VDR TaqI gene polymorphism(T vs t) with DN susceptibility in overall populations

Fig. 5

Association of VDR ApaI gene polymorphism(A vs a) with DN susceptibility in overall populations

Publication bias

Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test were carried out to analyse the publication bias. Results showed that there was no evidence of publication bias in the 7 studies (data not shown). However, due to the small number of studies, publication bias cannot be ruled-out in this paper.

Discussion

DN is the most common microvascular complication in diabetes patients, and the most common reason of ESRD in the United States [28]. 40% DM patients suffer from DN, and the occurrence have no association with hyperglycemia, suggesting genetic factors may be involved in the development of DN [29, 30].Currently, VDR has also been illustrated to be associated with the occurrence and development of DN [31].

The vitamin D has important biological functions, such as modulating immunity system, influencing insulin secretion and improving insulin resistance [32, 33], which are involved in the etiology of DN and more likely to be influenced by VDR gene polymorphisms. Given the controversial results from published individual studies with small sample sizes, we carried out a meta-analysis to clarify the association between the VDR gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to DN.

The VDR gene is located on chromosome 12 at q12-q14, it has14eons, 8 protein-coding exons and 6 untranslated region. ApaI and BsmI VDR gene variants locate in intron 8 and TaqI variants locate in exon 9. The FokI variants locate in the codon initiating translation, which has been reported to cause severe protein dificiency [25]. A large amount of common chronic disorder diseases, such as type 1 and type 2 DM, have been found to be relevant to specified VDR gene polymorphisms [34]. The effects of VDR gene polymorphisms on gene expression are still not clearly understood. VDR gene variants may have effect on RNA translational efficiency [35]. Distinctions of VDR mRNA express level and stability can affect the activity of renin-angiotensin system and participate in the progress of DN [26, 27].

In this study, we analyzed the VDR gene functional polymorphisms (ApaI, BsmI, FokI and TaqI) as potential genetic markers for DN. Nevertheless, the results of our research showed that none of these polymorphisms was significantly associated with DN risk in diabetic patients in overall population(all P values >0.05). Since genetic factors can affect the results of meta analysis, subgroup analysis were also preformed by race for the four polymorphisms. Our results indicate that there was a relationship between TT genotype and DN risk in Asians (TT vs Tt + tt: OR =2.21, 95% CI: 1.05–4.67, p = 0.04), however, p value equals to 0.04 seems not enough to support relationship between genetic variants and DN. Since only one published study in Asian populations was included in the BsmI and FokI groups, the stratified analysis for Asians might not be reliable in these two groups. Besides, there was no significant associations among the other three gene variants and DN in Caucasians and Asians(Table 2). Altogether, the results of the meta-analysis can be described as negative. Liu [34] reported that the FokI gene variants was related to DN susceptibility in Caucasians. We have a different result, and we performed a more comprehensive research on the association among four gene polymorphisms (ApaI, BsmI, FokI and TaqI) of VDR and DN risk. However, further large-scale studies should be carried out to testify our research.

For better understanding of the results, several limitations in our study should be mentioned. First, the number of subjects were relatively small, so we lacked sufficient statistical power to estimate the associations between VDR gene variants and susceptibility to DN. Second, meta-analysis is a retrospective study that may cause selection bias, which may have an impact on the reliability of results. Third, our study failed to acquire raw data from the selected articles, which may lead to further limitation in the assessment of potential effects of VDR gene polymorphisms in the occurrence and progression of DN.

Our research provide evidence that VDR TaqI polymorphism may be relevant to the risk of DN in DM patients among Asians. However, the number of articles included is really small, which is an important limit, and with such a small number of studies, subgroup (Asian/Caucasian) results we reported have to be considered as exploratory. Martin et al.’s [22] is by far the largest sample size study in our research. Consequently, the overall meta-analysis report results very close to those of Martin et al. Therefore, large-scale studies are still needed to provide a more representative meta-analysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that no significant association was observed among the ApaI, BsmI, FokI and TaqI variants and DN susceptibility in overall populations, the TaqI variants may be associated with DN risk in Asian populations. Future larger scale epidemiological investigation of this topic should be conducted to confirm or refute our findings.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

D + L: 

DerSimonian and Laird method

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

DN: 

Diabetic nephropathy

ESRD: 

End-stage renal failure

HWE: 

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

M–H: 

Mantel–Haenszel.

OR: 

Odds ratio

SNPs: 

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

VDR: 

Vitamin D receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all members of the Department of Central Laboratory for their collaboration.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No. 81300636 and Grant No. 81370865) .

Availability of data and materials

Material and data requirements can be sent to the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

LY and LW conceived the experiment. YF and JM performed the data search and extraction. LY and YF collected and analyzed the data. YF and JM carried out meta-analysis. LY wrote the paper. LW, YF and JM reviewed the draft. All authors have read and are in agreement with the submitted manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
(2)
Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University

References

  1. Phillips CA, Molitch ME. The relationship between glucose control and the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2(6):523–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown WV. Microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus: renal protection accompanies cardiovascular protection. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(12A):10L–3L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Duran-Salgado MB, Rubio-Guerra AF. Diabetic nephropathy and inflammation. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(3):393–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Nelson PJ, Alpers CE. Glomerular disease in 2011: new clues to environmental influences in glomerular disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;8(2):65–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Villeneuve LM, Natarajan R. The role of epigenetics in the pathology of diabetic complications. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299(1):14–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanwar YS, Sun L, Xie P, Liu FY, Chen S. A glimpse of various pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetic nephropathy. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:395–423.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang H, Zhu S, Chen J, Tang Y, Hu H, Mohan V, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma polymorphism Pro12Ala is associated with nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: evidence from meta-analysis of 18 studies. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1388–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Su X, Chen X, Liu L, Chang X, Yu X, Sun K. Intracellular adhesion molecule-1 K469E gene polymorphism and risk of diabetic microvascular complications: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69940.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chertow BS, Sivitz WI, Baranetsky NG, Clark SA, Waite A, Deluca HF. Cellular mechanisms of insulin release: the effects of vitamin D deficiency and repletion on rat insulin secretion. Endocrinology. 1983;113(4):1511–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourlon PM, Billaudel B, Faure-Dussert A. Influence of vitamin D3 deficiency and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 on de novo insulin biosynthesis in the islets of the rat endocrine pancreas. J Endocrinol. 1999;160(1):87–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baynes KC, Boucher BJ, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Vitamin D, glucose tolerance and insulinaemia in elderly men. Diabetologia. 1997;40(3):344–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(6):2017–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ozfirat Z, Chowdhury TA. Vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1011):18–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas O, Alokail MS, Alkharfy KM, Draz HM, Agliardi C, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and HLA DRB1*04 cosegregation in Saudi type 2 diabetes patients. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1325–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Juarez G, Luno J, Barrio V, de Vinuesa SG, Praga M, Goicoechea M, et al. 25 (OH) vitamin D levels and renal disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy and blockade of the renin–angiotensin system. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(11):1870–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Tian XQ, Zhao LM, Ge JP, Zhang Y, Xu YC. Elevated urinary level of vitamin D-binding protein as a novel biomarker for diabetic nephropathy. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7(2):411–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li L, Wu B, Liu JY, Yang LB. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res. 2013;44(3):235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang H, Wang J, Yi B, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Zhang K, et al. BsmI polymorphisms in vitamin D receptor gene are associated with diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes in the Han Chinese population. Gene. 2012;495(2):183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Ferrell RE. Molecular epidemiology of vitamin D receptor gene variants. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):203–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene. 2004;338(2):143–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Little J, Bradley L, Bray MS, Clyne M, Dorman J, Ellsworth DL, et al. Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(4):300–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin RJ, McKnight AJ, Patterson CC, Sadlier DM, Maxwell AP. Warren 3/UK GoKinD study group. A rare haplotype of the vitamin D receptor gene is protective against diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(2):497–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bucan K, Ivanisevic M, Zemunik T, Boraska V, Skrabić V, Vatavuk Z, et al. Retinopathy and nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients-association with polymorphisms of vitamin D-receptor, TNF, Neuro-D and IL-1 receptor 1 genes. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(Suppl 2):99–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nosratabadi R, Arababadi MK, Salehabad VA, Shamsizadeh A, Mahmoodi M, Sayadi AR, et al. Polymorphisms within exon 9 but not intron 8 of the vitamin D receptor are associated with the nephropathic complication of type-2 diabetes. Int J Immunogenet. 2010;37(6):493–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vedralová M, Kotrbova-Kozak A, Zelezníková V, Zoubková H, Rychlík I, Cerná M. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and parathyroid hormone gene in the development and progression of diabetes mellitus and its chronic complications, diabetic nephropathy and non-diabetic renal disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2012;36(1):1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li HM, Miao H, Lu YB, Cheng JL, Geng HF, Jiang XQ. Association between the polymorphism of human vitamin D receptor gene and the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy in Chinese Han population. Chin J Clin Rehabil. 2005;9(47):1–3.Google Scholar
  27. Rui HAN, Xia DONG, Bingchi SU, Wei YANG, Hua LIU, Dianping SONG. Association between TaqI , ApaI of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and type 2 diabetic nephropathy of the Han nationality in Kunming. China Medical Herald. 2015;12(9):69–72.Google Scholar
  28. Tuttle KR. Protein kinase C-beta inhibition for diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82:70–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu ZH. Diabetic nephropathy genetic background research. Chin Med J. 2002;4(8):561–2.Google Scholar
  30. Satko SG, Sedor JR, Iyengar SK, Freedman BI. Familial clustering of chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial. 2007;20(3):229–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Reis AF, Hauache OM, Velho G. Vitamin D endocrine system and the genetic susceptibility to diabetes, obesity and vascular disease. A review of evidence. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31(4 Pt 1):318–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lemire J. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-a hormone with immunomodulatory properties. Z Rheumatol. 2000;59:24–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Garbossa SG, Folli F. Vitamin D, sub-inflammation and insulin resistance. A window on a potential role for the interaction between bone and glucose metabolism. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18(2):241–58.Google Scholar
  34. Liu Z, Liu L, Chen X, He W, Yu X. Associations study of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with diabetic microvascular complications: a meta-analysis. Gene. 2014;546(1):6–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Valdivielso JM, Fernandez E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;371(1–2):1–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement