Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Novel de novo BRCA2mutation in a patient with a family history of breast cancer

  • Thomas V O Hansen1Email author,
  • Marie Luise Bisgaard2,
  • Lars Jønson1,
  • Anders Albrechtsen3,
  • Bettina Filtenborg-Barnkob4,
  • Hans Eiberg2,
  • Bent Ejlertsen5 and
  • Finn C Nielsen1
BMC Medical Genetics20089:58

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-9-58

Received: 26 January 2008

Accepted: 02 July 2008

Published: 02 July 2008

Abstract

Background

BRCA2 germ-line mutations predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Mutations are widespread and unclassified splice variants are frequently encountered. We describe the parental origin and functional characterization of a novel de novo BRCA2 splice site mutation found in a patient exhibiting a ductal carcinoma at the age of 40.

Methods

Variations were identified by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) and sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The effect of the mutation on splicing was examined by exon trapping in COS-7 cells and by RT-PCR on RNA isolated from whole blood. The paternity was determined by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis. Parental origin of the de novo mutation was determined by establishing mutation-SNP haplotypes by variant specific PCR, while de novo and mosaic status was investigated by sequencing of DNA from leucocytes and carcinoma tissue.

Results

A novel BRCA2 variant in the splice donor site of exon 21 (nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A) was identified. Exon trapping showed that the mutation activates a cryptic splice site 46 base pairs 3' of exon 21, resulting in the inclusion of a premature stop codon and synthesis of a truncated BRCA2 protein. The aberrant splicing was verified by RT-PCR analysis on RNA isolated from whole blood of the affected patient. The mutation was not found in any of the patient's parents or in the mother's carcinoma, showing it is a de novo mutation. Variant specific PCR indicates that the mutation arose in the male germ-line.

Conclusion

We conclude that the novel BRCA2 splice variant is a de novo mutation introduced in the male spermatozoa that can be classified as a disease causing mutation.

Background

Germ-line BRCA2 (MIM# 600185) mutations in female carriers confer a lifetime risk exceeding 80% for breast cancer and 20% for ovarian cancer, and a moderate increased risk of other cancer types [1, 2]. Studies have indicated that the risk of ovarian cancer is greatest in women with BRCA2 mutations localized in nucleotides 3035–6629 [3, 4]. Several genes are likely to be involved in breast cancer predisposition, but no susceptibility gene aside BRCA2 and BRCA1 is likely to account for a large fraction or a major increase in risk [5].

The BRCA2 gene spans approximately 70 kb and is composed of 27 exons, which encodes a protein of 3418 amino acids. BRCA2 is involved in homologous recombination [6, 7], but is also suggested to play a role in transcriptional regulation [8] and cell cycle control [9]. Mutations are distributed throughout the entire coding region of BRCA2 and to date numerous deleterious mutations have been reported (Breast Cancer Information Core [BIC]; [10]). The majority of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 associated breast and/or ovarian cancer have a family history, although healthy male carriers may obscure the apparent dominant trait. Several BRCA2 founder mutations have been identified, including the Ashkenazi Jewish nucleotide 6174delT mutation and the Icelandic nucleotide 999del5 mutation [11, 12]. In contrast, only two mutations in BRCA2 and one in BRCA1 have been reported as de novo mutations [1315], but since a positive family history is one of the criteria for mutation screening, it is possible that we overlook a number of patients with these mutations.

Here we report the functional characterization of a novel de novo BRCA2 splice site mutation located in the intervening sequence (IVS) of exon 21 (nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A) in a Danish breast cancer patient with a family history of breast cancer. The parental origin of the mutation is assigned to the father.

Methods

Patients

Family B49363 is a 23 member, three-generation kindred with two affected subjects. A 40 year old woman was referred to genetic counseling two months after she had breast-conserving surgery at Roskilde County Hospital with radical excision of an 8 mm large invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumor was estrogen and progesterone receptor positive and had malignancy grade II. The patient received adjuvant radiotherapy followed by seven series of chemotherapy with CEF and tamoxifen. The patient's mother had a mastectomy at age 59 with excision of a 22 mm large estrogen and progesterone receptor positive invasive ductal carcinoma, malignancy grade II, and postoperatively she received tamoxifen. Following verbal and written consent, blood and tumour samples were collected from the proband for mutation screening and after renewed consent a third blood sample was collected for RNA analysis. Moreover, blood and tumour samples from the patient's mother, and blood samples from the patient's father and sister were collected. The family history was verified using the registry of the DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group), hospital medical records and pathology reports, and genetic counselling was provided for each family member. Since the study is part of normal diagnostic procedures no ethical approval was obtained. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening

Genomic DNA was purified from whole blood using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were amplified using intronic primer pairs flanking each exon. PCR products were pre-screened by dHPLC (denaturing high performance liquid chromatography) using the WAWE system (Transgenomic) and sequenced using an ABI3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence variations were verified in a new blood sample. Moreover genomic DNA was examined by MLPA analysis (MRC-Holland). The BRCA1 variant is numbered according to GenBank accession number U14680, in which the A in the AUG start codon has number 120, whereas the BRCA2 variant is numbered according to GenBank accession number NC_000059, in which A in the AUG start codon has number 229. Moreover, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants are numbered according to GenBank accession number NC_000017.9 and NC_000013.9 using the guidelines from the Human Genetic Variation Society [16].

Vector constructs

The pSPL3 vector was obtained from Gibco-BRL. pSPL3-BRCA2-wild-type and pSPL3-BRCA2-mutant plasmids, containing BRCA2 exon 21 and flanking intron sequences, were constructed by PCR using purified DNA from human blood samples and the following oligonucleotides: BRCA2-F, 5'-GATCACGAATTCTTCCTGGAAAACTTATAGCA-3' and BRCA2-R 5'-GATCACCTCGAGTTAGGGTAGAGGATTATCAAGTACA-3'. The PCR products were treated with EcoRI and XhoI and cloned into the pSPL3 vector. All constructs were verified by sequencing.

Cell culture and transfections

COS-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 4500 mg/l glucose supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 μg of streptomycin per ml at 5% CO2 and 37°C. One day before transfection, cells were seeded in 6-well culture dishes at a density of 4 × 105 cells/well. Cells were transfected with a total of 4 μg plasmid DNA using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfection efficiencies for each series were determined by cotransfection of pEGFP plasmid (Clontech). The next day the media was changed and after another 24 h the cells were harvested and total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen).

Exon trapping analysis

First strand cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg RNA, 20 μM SA2 primer (5'-ATCTCAGTGGTATTTGTGAGC-3') and M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs). The cDNAs were amplified with pSPL3 vector-specific primers (5'-TCTGAGTCACCTGGACAACC-3' and 5'-ATCTCAGTGGTATTTGTGAGC-3') and the PCR products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. All experiments were repeated three times.

RNA analysis

A fresh blood sample was obtained from the patient. Total cellular RNA was isolated with Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), cDNA was synthesized using the AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega) as described by the supplier. The cDNA were amplified with the BRCA2 specific primers 5'-CGGCCTGCTCGCTGGTAT-3' and 5'-GCCTTCCTAATTTCCAACTGGATCTG-3' resulting in a 503 bp fragment. The samples were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Finally, the bands were purified, cloned into pCR-Blunt II-TOPO (Invitrogen) and sequenced using an ABI3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

SNP chip analysis

Genomic DNA was applied to 250K StyI (~238.000 SNPs) SNP-microarray chips and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Affymetrix, UK). Briefly, 250 ng of genomic DNA was digested with StyI and ligated to adapters. Adapter-ligated DNA was amplified, purified, fragmented and labeled with biotin and hybridized to the arrays for 18 h. The Affymetrix 450 fluidics station and the Affymetrix 3000 G7 gene scanner were used to wash, stain, and scan the arrays. The CEL files were analysed using the BRLMM algorithm from Affymetrix Genotyping analysis software (GTYPE). Relationship was inferred by estimating the pairwise identical by descent (IBD) sharing, as described [17].

Assignment of parental origin

Variant specific primers were designed using the software Primer3 in combination with ClustaIW alignments. The primer sets distinguish the wild-type allele (BRCA2 c.8754+1-G forward: 5'-AGACCCAGCTTACCTTGACG-3') from the mutation carrying allele (BRCA2 c.8754+1-A forward: 5'-CAGACCCAGCTTACCTTGAAA-3'), and the two SNP alleles in rs4942485 (rs4942485*A reverse: 5'-CTACATTACAGATGGCTAATATCTGATT-3' and rs4942485*G reverse: 5'-CATTACAGATGGCTAATATCTGAAC-3'. Primer sets were tested on homozygote controls and unspecific annealing was avoided after introducing mismatches (marked in bold). PCR was carried out using standard conditions according to the manufacturer's protocols using the Expand High FidelityPLUS Taq DNA polymerase (Roche). Allele sizes were: BRCA2 c.8754+1-G and rs942485-G = 2297 bp, BRCA2 c.8754+1-*A and rs942485-G = 2298 bp, BRCA2 c.8754+1-G and rs942485-A = 2300 bp, BRCA2 c.8754+1-*A and rs942485-A = 2301 bp.

Results and discussion

The patient was diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 40. Since her mother had breast cancer at the age of 59 (Fig. 1), the patient was referred to genetic counselling. No other family members had breast or ovarian cancer. We analysed the entire coding region and the exon-intron boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 from genomic DNA by dHPLC and sequencing and for large genomic rearrangements by MLPA analysis. The analysis revealed a polymorphism in exon 11 of BRCA1 (nucleotide 1186 A→G/c.1067 A→G), which is observed in approximately 5% of a control group [18], and a nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutation in BRCA2 that has not previously been reported in the BIC database (Fig. 2). The mutation occurs at the first base of the conserved GU splice donor site of intron 21. The mutation was verified in a second blood sample as well as in breast cancer tumour tissue.
Figure 1

Family pedigree. Breast cancers are indicated as well as the age at diagnosis. Acc, accident; BRC, breast cancer. The number following the cancer gives the age at diagnosis. Moreover, the genotypes from variant specific PCR are indicated. Diagonal slash indicates deceased. The proband is indicated with an arrow. Proband = individual 1, Sister = individual 2, Mother = individual 3, Father = individual 4.

Figure 2

Identification of the BRCA2 nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A variant. DNA was purified from whole blood and BRCA2 exon 21 was amplified using the primers 5'-CTTTGGGTGTTTTATGCTTGT-3' and 5'-CTGGCACATCACTGAAAATC-3' and sequenced. The analysis revealed a nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutation in BRCA2 (sense strand). The nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutation and the cryptic splice site are underlined.

To functionally characterize the BRCA2 nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A variant, a fragment containing BRCA2 exon 21 (122 bp), 449 bp of intron 20 (IVS20) and 408 bp of intron 21 (IVS21) containing the wild-type or the nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A variant, respectively, was cloned into the minigene vector pSPL3 containing exons from HIV-tat under the control of the SV40 promoter (Fig. 3A) [19]. Constructs containing either the wild-type or the mutant IVS21 sequence was transfected into COS-7 cells. After 48 hours mRNA was purified and examined by RT-PCR. The splicing products were separated on a 2% agarose gel. The wild-type construct yields a product of 299 bp and a product of 177 bp if exon 21 is excluded from the transcript (exon skipping). Moreover a larger product than 299 bp would demonstrate that additional intron sequence is included in the transcript. The normal wild-type BRCA2 exon 21 (pSPL3-BRCA2-wt) generated one transcript comprising the expected 299 bp, while the BRCA2 nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutant (pSPL3-BRCA2-mut) yielded a band with slightly higher mobility (Fig. 3B). Sequencing revealed, that it contained an additional 46 bp from intron 21 generating a transcript of 345 bp (Fig. 3C), indicating that it activates a cryptic splice site following these 46 bp (Fig. 1). To provide direct evidence for the aberrant splicing, RNA was isolated from whole blood of the affected patient and RT-PCR was performed before the products were analysed on a 1% agarose gel (Fig. 4). Two PCR products – one with the expected size of the wild-type (503 bp) and an additional RT-PCR product (549 bp) – were amplified from the patient. Cloning and sequence analysis of the latter verified the inclusion of 46 bp of intron 21 (data not shown).
Figure 3

Exon trapping analysis. (A) Structure of the exon trapping vector pSPL3 containing the BRCA2 exon 21 and 449 bp of intron 20 and 408 bp of intron 21, respectively containing the wild-type or the nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A variant. (B) COS-7 cells were transfected with pSPL3-BRCA2-exon 21 wild-type or pSPL3-BRCA2-exon 21 mutant plasmids. Total RNA was isolated, RT-PCR analysis was performed and the PCR products (in duplicates) were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The 299 bp product corresponds to wild-type exon 21 (unaltered splicing), while the 345 bp product corresponds to exon 21 and the inclusion of 46 bp of intron 21. The sizes of the DNA marker are indicated to the right. (C) Sequence of exon 21 (345 bp band). The nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutation and the TAA stop codon are underlined (sense strand).

Figure 4

RT-PCR was performed on RNA purified from whole blood from the proband. The cDNA was amplified with specific BRCA2 primers. The sample was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Two RT-PCR products (503 bp and 549 bp) were obtained from the patient (Lane 1). The sizes of the DNA marker are indicated to the left. The PCR products were cloned and sequence analysis revealed that the 549 bp band contained the inclusion of 46 bp of intron 21 (data not shown).

We examined the patient's mother, who was affected with the same type of breast cancer at the age of 59 years, for the same mutation, but she did not have this mutation in either DNA purified from blood or breast cancer tumour samples. Therefore mosaicism was excluded. Moreover, the father and the patient's sister did not carry the mutation. To establish the paternity we performed a SNP microarray analysis using 250K Sty gene array (Affymetrix). The analysis provided the relatedness estimates (Table 1), where k0 is the probability that pairs of individuals at a random loci share no allele identical by descent (IBD), k1 is the probability that pairs of individuals at a random loci share one allele IBD, and k2 the probability that pairs of individuals at a random loci share two allele IBD. The expected relatedness for full siblings is k0 = 0.25, k1 = 0.5, k2 = 0.25, for parent offspring k0 = 0, k1 = 1, k2 = 0, for unrelated k0 = 1, k1 = 0, k2 = 0, which in all cases fits in this family. We therefore conclude that the identified mutation in the proband is a de novo mutation in BRCA2. In contrast to the previously identified de novo BRCA2 nucleotide 3034del4 and BRCA1 nucleotide 3888delGA mutations [14, 15], the mutation reported in our study resides in a new position not previously reported in the BIC database. This was also the case with the BRCA2 nucleotide 7260insA mutation [13]. Several other variants have been detected in the vicinity of the splice donor site in exon 21, including nucleotide 8982 G→A/c.8754 G→A (reported once), nucleotide 8982+1 A→G/c.8754+4 A→G (reported seven times), nucleotide 8982+5 G→A/c.8754+5 G→A (reported once) and nucleotide 8982+5 G→T/c.8754+5 G→T (reported once), suggesting that this region could be prone to mutations.
Table 1

Relatedness estimates.

Individual

Individual

k0

k1

k2

Relationship

1

2

0.23

0.49

0.28

full siblings

1

3

0.01

0.99

0.00

parent offspring

1

4

0.01

0.99

0.00

parent offspring

2

3

0.01

0.98

0.01

parent offspring

2

4

0.01

0.99

0.01

parent offspring

3

4

0.98

0.02

0.00

unrelated

Relationship was infered by estimating the pairwise identical by descent (IBD) sharing as described in [17]. k0 is the probality that pairs of individuals at a random loci share no allele IBD, k1 the probality that pairs of individuals at a random loci share one allele IBD, and k2 the probality that pairs of individuals at a random loci share two allele IBD. The expected relatedness for full siblings is k0 = 0.25, k1 = 0.5, k2 = 0.25, for parent offspring k0 = 0, k1 = 1, k2 = 0, and for unrelated k0 = 1, k1 = 0, k2 = 0. The individual number is indicated in figure 1.

To determine the parental origin of the mutation, variant specific PCR was performed using primers designed to distinguish between two SNP alleles and the mutation carrying allele from the wild-type allele. The father was homozygote for the haplotype GG, while the mother was homozygote for the haplotype GA (see Fig. 1). PCR analysis of the proband revealed a band using mutant BRCA2 and rs4942485*G primers, indicating that the haplotype *AG must derive from the father, and that the mutation therefore arose in the testicular germ cells changing BRCA2 nucleotide 8982+1/c.8754+1 from G to A. This is in agreement with previous findings in BRCA1 [14], whereas the studies describing de novo mutations in BRCA2 were unable to determine parental origin [13, 15]. Examinations of other cancer families, including MEN2B and retinoblastoma families have indicated that de novo mutations primarily occur in the male germ line [20, 21] and that the fathers age is a major determinant since mutations accumulate during life [22]. It is, however, noteworthy that the age of the probands parents in our study was only 19 and 21 years at the time of birth of their affected daughter.

Conclusion

We conclude that the BRCA2 nucleotide 8982+1 G→A/c.8754+1 G→A mutation is a de novo mutation arising from the male germ line. The mutation is not previously reported in the BIC database. It leads to the activation of a cryptic splice site 46 base pairs 3' of exon 21 and introduces a premature stop codon and thereby a truncated BRCA2 protein. Therefore, this mutation can be classified as a disease-causing mutation. Analysis of intronic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants by functional splicing assays can provide information that can be used clinically.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Stine Østergaard and Dorthe Petersen are acknowledged for technical assistance. Written consent was obtained from the patient or their relatives for publication of the study. This study was supported by the Neye Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet
(2)
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen
(3)
Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen
(4)
Department of Pathology, Roskilde Hospital
(5)
Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet

References

  1. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT: Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 56 (1): 265-271.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, Quirk Y, Ford D, Collins N, Nguyen K, Seal S, Tran T, Averill D, et al: Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. Science. 1994, 265 (5181): 2088-2090. 10.1126/science.8091231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gayther SA, Mangion J, Russell P, Seal S, Barfoot R, Ponder BA, Stratton MR, Easton D: Variation of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene. Nat Genet. 1997, 15 (1): 103-105. 10.1038/ng0197-103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thompson D, Easton D: The genetic epidemiology of breast cancer genes. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2004, 9 (3): 221-236. 10.1023/B:JOMG.0000048770.90334.3b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith P, McGuffog L, Easton DF, Mann GJ, Pupo GM, Newman B, Chenevix-Trench G, Szabo C, Southey M, Renard H, Odefrey F, Lynch H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Couch F, Hopper JL, Giles GG, McCredie MR, Buys S, Andrulis I, Senie R, Goldgar DE, Oldenburg R, Kroeze-Jansema K, Kraan J, Meijers-Heijboer H, Klijn JG, van Asperen C, van Leeuwen I, Vasen HF, Cornelisse CJ, Devilee P, Baskcomb L, Seal S, Barfoot R, Mangion J, Hall A, Edkins S, Rapley E, Wooster R, Chang-Claude J, Eccles D, Evans DG, Futreal PA, Nathanson KL, Weber BL, Rahman N, Stratton MR: A genome wide linkage search for breast cancer susceptibility genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006, 45 (7): 646-655. 10.1002/gcc.20330.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies AA, Masson JY, McIlwraith MJ, Stasiak AZ, Stasiak A, Venkitaraman AR, West SC: Role of BRCA2 in control of the RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol Cell. 2001, 7 (2): 273-282. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00175-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Moynahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M: BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol Cell. 2001, 7 (2): 263-272. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00174-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shin S, Verma IM: BRCA2 cooperates with histone acetyltransferases in androgen receptor-mediated transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (12): 7201-7206. 10.1073/pnas.1132020100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Marmorstein LY, Kinev AV, Chan GK, Bochar DA, Beniya H, Epstein JA, Yen TJ, Shiekhattar R: A human BRCA2 complex containing a structural DNA binding component influences cell cycle progression. Cell. 2001, 104 (2): 247-257. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00209-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [http://www.research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/]
  11. Neuhausen S, Gilewski T, Norton L, Tran T, McGuire P, Swensen J, Hampel H, Borgen P, Brown K, Skolnick M, Shattuck-Eidens D, Jhanwar S, Goldgar D, Offit K: Recurrent BRCA2 6174delT mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women affected by breast cancer. Nat Genet. 1996, 13 (1): 126-128. 10.1038/ng0596-126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Thorlacius S, Olafsdottir G, Tryggvadottir L, Neuhausen S, Jonasson JG, Tavtigian SV, Tulinius H, Ogmundsdottir HM, Eyfjord JE: A single BRCA2 mutation in male and female breast cancer families from Iceland with varied cancer phenotypes. Nat Genet. 1996, 13 (1): 117-119. 10.1038/ng0596-117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Robson M, Scheuer L, Nafa K, Ellis N, Offit K: Unique de novo mutation of BRCA2 in a woman with early onset breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2002, 39 (2): 126-128. 10.1136/jmg.39.2.126.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Tesoriero A, Andersen C, Southey M, Somers G, McKay M, Armes J, McCredie M, Giles G, Hopper JL, Venter D: De novo BRCA1 mutation in a patient with breast cancer and an inherited BRCA2 mutation. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 65 (2): 567-569. 10.1086/302503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Luijt RB, van Zon PH, Jansen RP, van der Sijs-Bos CJ, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Ausems MG: De novo recurrent germline mutation of the BRCA2 gene in a patient with early onset breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2001, 38 (2): 102-105. 10.1136/jmg.38.2.102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. [http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen]
  17. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC: PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 81 (3): 559-575. 10.1086/519795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hadjisavvas A, Charalambous E, Adamou A, Neuhausen SL, Christodoulou CG, Kyriacou K: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Cyprus: identification of a founder BRCA2 mutation. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004, 151 (2): 152-156. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2003.09.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Church DM, Stotler CJ, Rutter JL, Murrell JR, Trofatter JA, Buckler AJ: Isolation of genes from complex sources of mammalian genomic DNA using exon amplification. Nat Genet. 1994, 6 (1): 98-105. 10.1038/ng0194-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlson KM, Bracamontes J, Jackson CE, Clark R, Lacroix A, Wells SA, Goodfellow PJ: Parent-of-origin effects in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. Am J Hum Genet. 1994, 55 (6): 1076-1082.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kato MV, Ishizaki K, Shimizu T, Ejima Y, Tanooka H, Takayama J, Kaneko A, Toguchida J, Sasaki MS: Parental origin of germ-line and somatic mutations in the retinoblastoma gene. Hum Genet. 1994, 94 (1): 31-38. 10.1007/BF02272838.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chandley AC: On the parental origin of de novo mutation in man. J Med Genet. 1991, 28 (4): 217-223.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/9/58/prepub

Copyright

© Hansen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.