Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A novel mutation in the WFS1gene identified in a Taiwanese family with low-frequency hearing impairment

  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Medical Genetics20078:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-8-26

©  Tsai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

  • Received: 28 September 2006
  • Accepted: 22 May 2007
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Wolfram syndrome gene 1 (WFS1) accounts for most of the familial nonsyndromic low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (LFSNHL) which is characterized by sensorineural hearing losses equal to and below 2000 Hz. The current study aimed to contribute to our understanding of the molecular basis of LFSNHL in an affected Taiwanese family.

Methods

The Taiwanese family with LFSNHL was phenotypically characterized using audiologic examination and pedigree analysis. Genetic characterization was performed by direct sequencing of WFS1 and mutation analysis.

Results

Pure tone audiometry confirmed that the family members affected with LFSNHL had a bilateral sensorineural hearing loss equal to or below 2000 Hz. The hearing loss threshold of the affected members showed no progression, a characteristic that was consistent with a mutation in the WFS1 gene located in the DFNA6/14/38 locus. Pedigree analysis showed a hereditarily autosomal dominant pattern characterized by a full penetrance. Among several polymorphisms, a missense mutation Y669H (2005T>C) in exon 8 of WFS1 was identified in members of a Taiwanese family diagnosed with LFSNHL but not in any of the control subjects.

Conclusion

We discovered a novel heterozygous missense mutation in exon 8 of WFS1 (i.e., Y669H) which is likely responsible for the LFSNHL phenotype in this particular Taiwanese family.

Keywords

  • Hearing Impairment
  • Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Pure Tone Audiometry
  • Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Pattern
  • Wolfram Syndrome

Background

Severe hearing impairment affects 1 in 1000 newborns and will in a significant percentage of this population lead to a delayed speech and language development. Hereditary hearing loss may be associated with other clinical disorders and coexist with other organ malformations (syndromic), or may be the only disease phenotype (non-syndromic). Approximately 70% of hereditary deafness is non-syndromic, of which ~80% is categorized as autosomal recessive (DFNB), ~15–20% as autosomal dominant (DFNA), ~1% as X-linked (DFN), and ~≥1% as mitochondrial or chromosome aberrations [1]. To date, over 90 different loci correlated with the non-syndromic disease have been mapped [2]. Thirty-nine genes underlying non-syndromic hearing impairment have been identified and more than a dozen genes involved in syndromic deafness have also been uncovered [3].

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic low frequency sensorineural hearing loss (LFSNHL; OMIM #600965) is a unique phenotype of hearing impairment affecting the low frequencies (i.e., 2000 Hz and below) [4]. Although over 50 loci have been mapped in various types of DFNA cases, to date, only three chromosomal loci have been associated with LFSNHL (i.e., 5q31 (DFNA1), 4p16 (DFNA6/14/38), and 5q31 between D5S1972 and D5S410 (DFNA54)) [2, 5]. Two genes, namely the Homo sapiens diaphanous homolog 1 gene (DIAPH1) related to DFNA1 and the Wolfram syndrome 1 gene (WFS1), have been shown to be involved in LFSNHL [6, 7]. WSF1 encodes wolframin, a hydrophobic transmembrane protein that is related to LFSNHL associated with DFNA6/14/38 [8, 9]. Although the loci DFNA1, DFNA6/14/38, and DFNA54 are associated with LFSNHL, the progression of hearing impairment caused by a mutation in either of these three loci exhibits different characteristics. Patients carrying a mutation in the DFNA1 locus typically experience a rapidly deteriorating hearing impairment spreading from low to all higher frequencies [10]. In contrast, patients carrying a mutation in the DFNA54 or DFNA6/14/38 locus experience deafness propagating from low to high frequencies [5] or have no or mild progression beyond the presbycusis [4, 9, 11], respectively.

In this study, we have examined a Taiwanese family affected by non-progressive LFSNHL and identified a novel mutation in the WFS1 gene (i.e., Y669H) which is most likely correlated with LFSNHL as this mutation was not observed in any of the numerous control subjects with normal hearing abilities who were examined herein.

Methods

Subjects and audiometric examination

A Taiwanese family comprised of 10 individuals, including three members diagnosed with LFSNHL, was examined. After signing the informed consent, family members received a medical survey, including otorhinolaryngologic examination, especially otoscopy. Based on the medical history of the subjects tested herein, syndromic and/or environmental deafness could be excluded based on the review of the medical history (data not shown). Unrelated control subjects exhibited no symptomatic signs of auditory and/or vestibular impairment, based on their medical history and physical examination, including pure tone audiometry (GSI 17 portable audiometer, (Grason-Stadler, Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from 4 ml whole blood or buccal epithelial cells using the GFX™ Genomic Blood DNA Purification Kit (Amersham Biosciences) and stored at -20°C until used.

Primer design and PCR amplification

Coding and flanking intron sequences of exons 2 to 8 of the WFS1 gene (GenBank accession number AC004599) were amplified by PCR using 13 primer pairs (Table 1). PCR reactions were performed in a 50-μL volume containing 100–500 ng DNA, 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 200 μM dNTPs, 1× PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2), and 0.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold™ DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR amplifications were performed in a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min and then 36 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 45 s, followed by 7 min of final extension at 72°C. In case of exon 8, amplifications were performed for 30 cycles at an annealing temperature of 58°C.
Table 1

Primers used in PCR/sequencing reaction of WFS1 coding region*

Primer sequence

Fragment

Forward primer (5-3)

Reverse primer (5-3)

Exon 2†

AAGCGGTGCTGGCCCATG

CCGTTCCCACCCAGCTATC

Exon 3†

TACTCCTGGCCTGGATTTGA

CATGGGCACCCTACCAACA

Exon 4†

AGTGGCCGGAGGCTCAGT

CCAACAGCATCACCAGCGT

Exon 5†

AGTCAGATGTCCATGCATCC

CTCTACAGGAAGGTTCTGGT

Exon 6†

GAGCACGCTACGTGGTGCT

GGAGGCACGGGTGAGATAG

Exon 7†

CCTGAACCCACTCAGCTC

CCAGCGGCACGGCTGTAA

Exon 8-1§

TTCCCACGTACCATCTTTCC

CACATCCAGGTTGGGCTC

Exon 8-2§

AGAACTTCCGCACCCTCAC

TCAGGTAGGGCCAATTCAAG

Exon 8-3§

CTATCGCTGCTGCCCTCC

GGGCAAAGAGGAAGAGGAAG

Exon 8-4§

GTGAGCTCTCCGTGGTCATC

CCCTCTGAGCGGTACACATAG

Exon 8-5§

ATCCTGGTGTGGCTCACG

GTAGAGGCAGCGCATCCAG

Exon 8-6§

GCGTGACTGACATCGACAAC

GCTGAACTCGATGAGGCTG

Exon 8-7§

CAGCAGCGAGTTCAAGAGC

CCTCATGGCAACATGCAC

*WFS1 sequence based on the GenBank entry (accession number: AC004599).

†Primers were designed and synthesized herein (Methods).

§Primers were provided by Dr. Yann-Jinn Lee.

Direct sequencing

A 10-μL sequencing reaction was performed with 100 ng of the purified PCR product as a template, 30 pmol of each of the sequencing primers, and 1 μL of the BigDye Terminator v3.0 Sequencing Ready Reaction Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). After completion of the reaction, the mixture was purified by gel filtration on a Sephadex G-50 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Bidirectional sequencing was analyzed on an automated ABI Prism 377-18 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

PCR-RFLP analysis

A PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay was used to detect the 1235 T>C and 2005 T>C nucleotide changes. The 672-bp PCR product amplified by PCR using the forward primer (5'-TTC CCA CGT ACC ATC TTT CC-3') and the reverse primer (5'-CAC ATC CAG GTT GGG CTC-3') contained a polymorphic restriction site at position 1235. Amplification was performed as described above and PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products (3 μL) were digested with 7 U of restriction enzyme BbsI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in a final volume of 10 μL and fragments were separated on a 2% agarose gel.

The 154-bp PCR product with the polymorphic restriction site at position 2005 was amplified by PCR using forward primer 5'-GTC AAG CTC ATC CTG GTG TG-3' and reverse primer 5'-CCA TGT TGG TCT CCT TCC AG-3'. PCR amplification was performed as described above. After verification of the PCR products on agarose gel, 3 μL was used to digest with 7.5 U of NlaIII (New England Biolabs) in a final volume of 10 μL and fragments were separated on a 4% agarose gel.

Results

Characteristic hearing impairment in family members affected with LFSNHL

The Taiwanese family examined herein showed an autosomal dominant hereditary pattern with a full penetrance, which strongly suggests that an underlying genetic factor is involved (Figure 1). Three affected members (I:2, II:1, and II:3) had a characteristic LFSNHL and did not wear hearing aids. Audiograms of the affected members showed a bilateral average hearing of 40–60 dB at the frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and a normal hearing threshold at 4 and 8 kHz (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Pedigree of the family affected with LFSNHL and audiogram of three chosen affected individuals. In the pedigree, shaded symbols indicate family members affected by LFSNHL, while open symbols indicate those with a normal hearing. An autosomal dominant hereditary pattern is shown in this pedigree. Pure tone audiograms of I:2, II:1, and II:3 show a predominantly bilateral low-tone hearing impairment. Circles and crosses indicate air conduction in the right and left ears respectively.

The hearing loss threshold of the mother (I:2, age 56) and her affected daughters (II:1, age 36; and II:3, age 22) showed nearly no progression based on a comparison of symptoms between the mother and her daughters. The latter is characteristic for a mutation in the DFNA6/14/38 locus of WFS1 (Figure 1).

Identification of a novel mutation in the WFS1gene in family members with LFSNHL

Four non-synonymous nucleotide changes were identified by direct sequencing of the WFS1 gene coding sequence (exon 2–8) in the three affected individuals. Two of these changes (1832A>G and 2158A>G) were ruled out by phenotype-genotype comparisons within the family, whereas the other two non-synonymous changes (1235T>C and 2005A>C) were potential candidate mutations.

Though 1235T>C had been reported as polymorphism based on study of Japanese society, we compared the RFLP pattern of the family members with that of 100 unrelated controls possessed of Taiwanese genetic background and normal pure tone audiograms [12]. The controls were screened for the occurrence of mutations of interest based on the RFLP assays. The three family members affected with LFSNHL and 1 out of 100 controls (200 chromosomes) had the same RFLP pattern after digestion of the amplicons by BbsI in position 1235 (Figure 2a). The presence of this polymorphism was attributed to a 1235T>C mutation. However, the RFLP pattern of none of the 100 controls (200 chromosomes) was identical to that of any of the affected family members upon digestion of amplicons with NlaIII at position 2005 (Figure 2b), strongly suggesting that the 2005T>C, but not the 1235T>C mutation, is related to the symptoms observed among the family members.
Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) RFLP of the BbsI-digested PCR fragments flanking the 1235T>C region for the family affected by LFSNHL and one normal control. The 672-bp PCR product obtained using the forward primer (5'-TTC CCA CGT ACC ATC TTT CC-3') and the reverse primer (5'-CAC ATC CAG GTT GGG CTC-3') contains a polymorphic restriction site at position 1235. Two fragments of 455 bp and 217 bp from genotype TT were unaffected by enzyme digestion, while three fragments of 672 bp (solid arrow), 455 bp, and 217 bp were observed from heterozygotes carrying genotype TC as I:2, II:1, II:3 and one normal control (C indicated by the open arrow). M: DNA marker. (b) RFLP of NlaIII digested the fragment flanking the 2005T>C region of LFSNHL family members and normal controls. The 154-bp PCR product of the polymorphic restriction site at position 2005 was amplified by PCR using the forward primer (5'-GTC AAG CTC ATC CTG GTG TG-3') and reverse primer (5'-CCA TGT TGG TCT CCT TCC AG-3'). Genotype TT such as unaffected individuals and controls (C1, C2, C3 and C4) demonstrated two fragments of 78 and 75 bp, whereas the heterozygote TC such as I:2, II:1, and II:3 showed 4 fragments of 78, 75, 41 (solid arrow), and 37 bp (solid arrow). In all samples, the enzyme also generated a fragment of 1 bp, which was too small to be seen in the gel. U: undigested control, M: DNA marker. (c) Electrophoregrams of WFS1 gene sequences flanking position 2005 of the affected and unaffected family members. The affected family members are heterozygote (T and C) in position 2005 (labeled with a star), while the unaffected family members are homozygous as T in the same place.

This demonstrates that we have identified a novel heterozygous mutation 2005T>C in exon 8, which predicts a Y669H alteration (Figure 3). This mutation was found in all the affected members of this family that exhibited LFSNHL (Figure 2c), but not in any of the control subjects, nor was it present in the respective WFS1 gene products of Mus sp. and Rattus sp. (Figure 3). This particular genetic region of the WFS1 gene product is highly conserved among healthy humans, Mus sp., and Rattus sp. (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Amino acid sequence comparison of the respective genetic regions of WFS1 exon 8 of healthy Homo sapiens, Mus sp., and Rattus sp. indicating its conservativeness.

Discussion

We have identified a novel mutation in the WFS1 gene (i.e., Y669H) in a Taiwanese family whose members were likely diagnosed with LFSNHL, although other diagnoses could not be excluded with certainty. Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in WFS1 may lead to the autosomal recessive inherited Wolfram syndrome, presenting a variety of phenotypes, including diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness, referred to as DIDMOAD (OMIM:#222300) [13]. Audiograms of patients diagnosed with Wolfram syndrome typically show hearing impairment involving the middle and high frequencies [14]. In contrast, heterozygous mutations in WFS1 clustered in the C-terminal domain affect the low frequency component of human audiogram [15]. These characteristics are consistent with those presented by the affected subjects of the Taiwanese family studied herein, i.e. low pitch deterioration and the occurrence of a Y669H mutation in the C-terminal region of WFS1. Interestingly, a Y669C mutation has been observed in a Wolfram syndrome patient [13]. Therefore, it is likely that the C-terminal domain of WFS1 be involved in tonotopic arrangement. However, the role of wolframin and its implication in the etiology of LFSNHL in humans is still unclear. It has been suggested that wolframin could be involved in proper ion transport in the inner ear [16].

The identification of the Y669H mutation in the WFS1 gene product of members of the Taiwanese family with symptoms of LFSNHL, the absence of this mutation in control subjects with a normal hearing ability, and the degree of conservation of Y669 in the WFS1 protein of human, mouse, and rat supports our interpretation that the Y669H mutation is causative. A recent examination of a Danish family revealed a clinical spectrum with considerable overlap between classical Wolfram syndrome and non-syndromic LFSNHL [17]. Unfortunately, due to a limited clinical history of the Taiwanese family members lacking endocrinological, ophthalmological, and psychiatric analyses, it is at present impossible to verify whether the symptoms of the subjects studied herein resemble those related to this clinical spectrum. In addition, one should consider that a mutation in one gene may produce multiple phenotypes (allelism) and that a mutation in the same allele may produce different hearing loss characteristics in different families (pleiotropic effect). Furthermore, a recent report strongly suggests that the phenotypic outcome of a particular mutation in a genetic region that causes an improper functioning of the hearing apparatus may be influenced by modifier genes that affect for instance disease penetrance and progression. In other words, the same mutation may lead to a considerably different phenotype in two distinct families as each individual is born with a unique complement of modifier genes [18]. Thus, in order to link with certainty the Y669H mutation in WFS1 with symptoms of LFSNHL, future research will involve the construction of a transgenic mouse model carrying this mutation and the analysis of its phenotypic behavior, particularly in respect to symptoms of hearing impairment.

Conclusion

Phenotypic and genetic characterization of a Taiwanese family affected with LFSNHL revealed a novel missense mutation in WFS1 (i.e., 2005A>C; Y669H) which was not observed in any of the examined healthy control subjects. The molecular diagnosis of this family may provide new insights for genetic counseling of families affected with hearing loss and may help to solve the molecular basis of hearing impairment. Evaluation of other affected family members and other unrelated LFSNHL families may help to uncover new WFS1 mutations and polymorphisms and help to decipher the role of wolframin in auditory functions.

Abbreviations

LFSNHL: 

low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss

RFLP: 

restriction fragment length polymorphism

WFS1: 

Wolfram syndrome gene 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating family members for their cooperation and Dr. Yann-Jinn Lee for designing and providing primers for WFS1 exon 8. We also thank the audiologist, Mr. Sun-Yi Weng, for his participation in the hearing assessments. This study was supported in part by grants from the National Science Counsel (NSC 92-2314-B-195-030) and the Mackay Memorial Hospital (MMH9323).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Otolaryngology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Section 2, Chungshan North Road, Taipei, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 45, Minsheng Road, Tamshui, Taipei, Taiwan
(3)
Department of Speech and Hearing Disorders and Sciences, National Taipei College of Nursing, 89 Nei-Chiang Street, Wanhua, Taipei, Taiwan

References

  1. Schrijver I: Hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. Transforming silence to sound. J Mol Diagn. 2004, 6: 275-284.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hereditary hearing loss homepage. [http://webhost.ua.ac.be/hhh/]
  3. Petit C: From deafness genes to hearing mechanisms: harmony and counterpoint. Trends Mol Med. 2006, 12: 57-64. 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bom SJ, Kunst HP, Huygen PL, Cremers FP, Cremers CW: Non-syndromal autosomal dominant hearing impairment: ongoing phenotypical characterization of genotypes. Br J Audiol. 1999, 33: 335-348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurtler N, Kim Y, Mhatre A, Schlegel C, Mathis A, Lalwani AK: DFNA54, a third locus for low-frequency hearing loss. J Mol Med. 2004, 82: 775-780. 10.1007/s00109-004-0597-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Noguchi Y, Yashima T, Hatanaka A, Uzawa M, Yasunami M, Kimura A, Kitamura K: A mutation in Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene in a Japanese family with autosomal dominant low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005, 125: 1189-94. 10.1080/00016480510044232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lynch ED, Lee MK, Morrow JE, Welcsh PL, Leon PE, King MC: Nonsyndromic deafness DFNA1 associated with mutation of a human homolog of the Drosophila gene diaphanous. Science. 1997, 278: 1315-1318. 10.1126/science.278.5341.1315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bespalova IN, Van Camp G, Bom SJH, Brown DJ, Cryns K, DeWan AT, Erson AE, Flothmann K, Kunst HPM, Kurnool P, Sivakumaran TA, Cremers CWRJ, Leal SM, Burmeister M, Lesperance MM: Mutations in the Wolfram syndrome 1 gene (WFS1) are a common cause of low frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 2501-2508. 10.1093/hmg/10.22.2501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Young TL, Ives E, Lynch E, Person R, Snook S, MacLaren L, Cator T, Griffin A, Fernandez B, Lee MK, King M-C: Non-syndromic progressive hearing loss DFNA38 is caused by heterozygous missense mutation in the Wolfram syndrome gene WFS1. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 2509-2514. 10.1093/hmg/10.22.2509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lalwani AK, Jackler RK, Sweetow RW, Lynch ED, Raventos H, Morrow J, King MC, Leon PE: Further characterization of the DFNA1 audiovestibular phenotype. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998, 124: 699-702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pennings RJ, Bom SJH, Cryns K, Flothmann K, Huygen PLM, Kremer H, Van Camp G, Cremers CWRJ: Progression of low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (DFNA6/14-WFS1). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003, 129: 421-426. 10.1001/archotol.129.4.421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawamoto T, Horikawa Y, Tanaka T, Kabe N, Takeda J, Mikuni M: Genetic variations in the WFS1 gene in Japanese with type 2 diabetes and bipolar disorder. Mol Genet Metab. 2004, 82: 238-245. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.04.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Strom TM, Hortnagel K, Hofmann S, Gekeler F, Scharfe C, Rabl W, Gerbitz KD, Meitinger T: Diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy and deafness (DIDMOAD) caused by mutations in a novel gene (wolframin) coding for a predicted transmembrane protein. Hum Mol Genet. 1998, 7: 2021-2028. 10.1093/hmg/7.13.2021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pennings RJ, Huygen PL, Van den Ouweland JM, Cryns K, Dikkeschei LD, Van Camp G, Cremers CWRJ: Sex-related hearing impairment in Wolfram syndrome patients identified by inactivating WFS1 mutations. Audiol Neurootol. 2004, 9: 51-62. 10.1159/000074187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cryns K, Sivakumaran TA, Van den Ouweland JM, Pennings RJE, Cremers CWRJ, Flothmann K, Young T-L, Smith RJH, Lesperance MM, Van Camp G: Mutational spectrum of the WFS1 gene in Wolfram syndrome, nonsyndromic hearing impairment, diabetes mellitus, and psychiatric disease. Hum Mutat. 2003, 22: 275-287. 10.1002/humu.10258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cryns K, Thys S, Van Laer L, Oka Y, Pfister M, Van Nassauw L, Smith RJH, Timmermans J-P, Van Camp G: The WFS1 gene, responsible for low frequency sensorineural hearing loss and Wolfram syndrome, is expressed in a variety of inner ear cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2003, 119: 247-256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eiberg H, Hansen L, Kjer B, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Bille M, Rosenberg T, Tranebjaerg L: Autosomal dominant optic atrophy associated with hearing impairment and impaired glucose regulation caused by a missense mutation in the WFS1 gene. J Med Genet. 2006, 43: 435-440. 10.1136/jmg.2005.034892.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mchugh RK, Friedman RA: Genetics of hearing loss: allelism and modifier genes produce a phenotypic continuum. Anatom Rec Part A. 2006, 288 (4): 370-381. 10.1002/ar.a.20297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

    19. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/8/26/prepub

Copyright

© Tsai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Medical Genetics

ISSN: 1471-2350

Contact us