Clinical characteristics and mutation Spectrum of NF1 in 12 Chinese families with orbital/periorbital plexiform Neurofibromatosis type 1
BMC Medical Genetics volume 20, Article number: 158 (2019)
Orbital/periorbital plexiform neurofibroma (OPPN) can compromise physical appearance and visual function. However, the clinical characteristics and NF1 mutation landscape in patients with heritable OPPN have not been reported.
The medical charts of 26 Chinese patients with OPPN from 12 families were reviewed. Mutation analysis of the entire coding region and flanking splice sites of the NF1 gene was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Novel NF1 mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Compared to the parental generation, a significantly larger proportion of OPPN patients in the successive generation presented with earlier onset (p = 0.001), amblyopia (p = 0.034), motility disorders (p = 0.009) and bony orbital expansion (p = 0.019). Six novel NF1 mutations were identified in 11 (91.67%) families, including 6 (42.9%) single-base substitutions, 4 (28.5%) splicing mutations, 3 (21.4%) frameshift deletions, and 1 (7.14%) intron mutation.
The successive generation of OPPN patients presented with earlier onset and exhibited more severe ocular signs than did their parents or grandparents. Special attention should be paid to successive generations of OPPN patients. Considering that 6 mutations were novel, comprehensive NF1 mutation analysis is required or necessary or proposed for genetic counselling.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders , with an incidence of 1 per 2500 to 3000 individuals, independent of ethnicity and sex . The most frequent clinical manifestations of NF1 patients include multiple benign neurofibromas, > 6 alterations of skin pigmentation (café au lait spots), iris (Lisch) nodules, skeletal abnormalities, learning disabilities, cardiovascular disorders and nervous system neoplasms, as well as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours . Furthermore, the occurrence of serious complications increases with age. Therefore, NF1 is a fully penetrant neuro-cutaneous tumour-predisposing disorder with intractable complications.
The most disastrous subtype of NF1 is plexiform neurofibromatosis (PN) . Approximately 30 to 56% of NF1 patients develop PNs, which may involve the eyelid, orbit and periorbital and facial structures [5, 6]. Orbital/periorbital PNs (OPPNs) can cause a dramatic change in physical appearance, such as proptosis, ptosis, and facial disfigurement, thus leading to decreased self-esteem, social embarrassment and mood disorders [7, 8]. In addition, OPPNs can cause various ocular complications, such as optic pathway gliomas, glaucoma, Lisch and choroidal nodules, ultimately resulting in loss of vision, especially during visual maturation  in children.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 is caused by a mutation in the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) tumour-suppressor gene, which comprises 2350 kb and 60 exons on chromosome 17q11 . The gene product neurofibromin (2818 amino acids) contains a domain with significant homology to Ras GTPase-activating proteins, and it regulates Ras activity . Therefore, a lack of functional neurofibromin leads to dysregulated Ras signalling and tumourigenesis. PN consists of neoplastic Schwann cells, fibroblasts, perineural cells and mast cells. Neoplastic Schwann cells lack NF1 gene expression and exhibit elevated levels of activated Ras. In turn, activated Ras initiates a cascade of signalling events, such as activation of Raf and mitogen-activated protein kinase, thus promoting cell proliferation. A previous study revealed numerous NF1 gene mutations in lung cancer, glioblastoma, melanoma and cutaneous NF1 [6, 11, 12]; however, to our knowledge, the literature exploring the NF1 mutations in OPPN patients is rather limited.
Here, we present in detail the clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with OPPN and investigate the NF1 mutation spectrum.
A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients diagnosed with OPPNs at Ninth People’s Hospital of Shanghai between January 2013 and June 2016. NF1 diagnosis was based on clinical features conforming to at least two of the following National Institutes of Health criteria : six or more café au lait spots, axillary or inguinal freckling, two or more cutaneous neurofibromatosis, one plexiform NF, characteristic bony defects, optic glioma, two or more iris Lisch nodules, or a first-degree relative with NF1. Moreover, the probands of all families presented with plexiform NF in the orbital or periorbital region. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a follow-up period < 6 months; and (2) incomplete data collection. We contacted all patients and their relatives who met the inclusion criteria and explained the purpose of the study; the participants were voluntary without any compensation. A total of 36 OPPN patients were included in this study. The OPPNs include 32 hereditary OPPNs (14 families) and 2 sporadic OPPNs. Of the 34 patients from 14 families who met the inclusion criteria, 4 were not reached, and 2 declined to participate for other reasons, such as time or geographic limitations. Of the 28 patients who agreed to return for the follow-up visit, 2 were excluded for incomplete data, leaving a final sample size of 26 patients. All 26 patients had familial OPPN.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their guardians at the follow-up visit. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Shanghai Jiaotong University research ethics committee. The medical records were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments and final outcomes at follow-up. The demographics consisted of age and sex. The clinical characteristics included the presence of amblyopia, motility disturbances, corneal changes, optic nerve disorders, ptosis, proptosis, canthal abnormalities, cafe au lait spots, facial descent, cheek deformities, bony orbital expansion and soft tissue expansion of eyelids. If the patients’ relative had received treatment elsewhere, his/her prior clinical details and pathological sections were retrieved for review. Regarding outcome measures, the duration from the initial diagnosis to the first recurrence was documented.
Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood leukocytes of the participants. We collected genomic DNA samples from at least two affected patients of each family (24 patients in 12 families and 2 unaffected volunteers were chosen as controls). The affected patients shared the same NF1 mutation site, which was wild-type in the unaffected patients. These mutations were not present in 100 normal subjects or in the dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP), predicted to be not tolerated by SIFT (http://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/index.html) and to be a disease-causing variant by Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). A panel of NF1 gene exons, splicing sites and promoter regions was designed and sequenced following the instructions of Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher, USA). A targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach, bioinformatics analyses, and Sanger sequencing were utilized. Library preparation, qualification, and NGS were conducted using the Illumina Hiseq2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Bioinformatics analyses, including read alignments and calculations of coverage and depth, were also carried out according to a previously described protocol . The following 5 databases were used for annotation of all identified variants, including dbSNP137 (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/database/snp137.txt.gz.), HapMap Project (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap), 1000 Genomes Project (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp), YH (http://yh.genomics.org.cn/), and Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs. washington.edu/EVS/). NF1 microarray data are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
DNA extraction and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from the patients’ peripheral blood leukocytes (51,206; QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The region of the mutated NF1 genomic fragments was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which was performed with 100 ng genomic DNA, 25 μL 2× GC-rich buffer, 8 μL of a dNTP mixture (2.5 mmol/L), 1 U LA Taq (Takara Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd), 2 μL (10 μmol/L) of each primer, and ddH2O to a final volume of 50 μL. The PCR amplification protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 3 min. The PCR products were then Sanger sequenced to produce a chromatogram. These primers used are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.
The data were analysed using SAS software (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The frequency (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation are reported for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Means and proportions were compared using Student’s t test and the chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test, if appropriate), respectively. All tests were two-sided, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess the cumulative recurrence rate.
Clinical characteristics of heritable Chinese OPPN patients
A total of 26 eyes from 26 patients were recruited for this study. Among them, 9 patients (35%) were male and 17 (65%) female. The mean age was 26.9 ± 15.3 years, ranging from 6.0 years to 50.0 years. The mean follow-up period was 35.1 ± 19.6 months. Various clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with OPPN are displayed in Fig. 1. The most commonly involved area is the upper eyelid (Fig. 2a). Histologically, the nodules consisted of abundant collagen fibre bundles, nerve sheaths and Schwann cells (Fig. 2b). Moreover, these OPPN patients often exhibited orbital expansion (Fig. 2c), facial osteoclasia (Fig. 2d), intracranial invasion (Fig. 2e), corneal ulcer and symblepharon (Fig. 2f). Systematic manifestations, such as café au lait spots (Fig. 2g) and coexisting extraocular NFs nodules (Fig. 2 h, i), were also found.
Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the patients and their previous generation, and the results are summarized in Table 1. Most patients exhibited OPPN in the same laterality as their parents and/or grandparents. Of note, significantly earlier onset (p = 0.001) and more severe symptoms were observed in successive generations. Additionally, compared to their ancestors, a larger proportion of patients displayed amblyopia (p = 0.034), motility disorders (p = 0.009) and bony orbital expansion (p = 0.019). However, no statistical significance was found regarding the following: sex; the presence of ptosis; proptosis; cafe au lait spots; facial descent; cheek deformities; soft tissue expansion of the eyelids or corneal or optic nerve; or canthal abnormalities. Among the 12 patients who underwent reconstruction surgery at our hospital, 10 (83.3%) experienced recurrence. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, the 1-year recurrence rate was 83.3%, and the median duration to the initial recurrence was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval: 5.30–8.70 months).
Novel NF1 mutations in Chinese OPPN families
Mutation analysis revealed a wide spectrum of NF1 mutations in this cohort (Table 2), with fourteen different mutations identified. Eleven (91.7%) OPPN families presented NF1 mutations, and 6 identified mutations were novel. Nine (64.3%) of the fourteen identified mutations were distributed in exons, three (21.4%) in splicing sites and one (7%) in an intron. Among exon mutations, three (33.3%) nonsense mutations causing premature termination of neurofibromin were detected; three frameshift mutations and three missense mutations were also discovered. These mutations were evenly distributed from exon 12 to intron 49 of the gene. Additionally, no common mutations were detected across the families, suggesting the absence of mutational hot spots. The regions of NF1 genomic DNA mutation sited were amplified by PCR (Fig. 3a), and a Sanger chromatogram confirmed novel mutations (Fig. 3b).
OPPN is a severe form of NF with a short, non-progressive period . This study constitutes the largest cohort of heritable OPPNs. The successive generation presented earlier onset and exhibited more severe ocular signs, including amblyopia, motility disorders and bony orbital expansion, when compared with their parents or grandparents. In general, earlier onset can result from an increased awareness of the disease in a family. Each Chinese family with OPPN in our study shared one common NF1 mutation; however, the underlying reason for the aggravated symptoms in the successive generation remains unclear. Notably, no common mutations were detected across the OPPN families, indicating that there were no mutational hot spots. Additionally, no obvious genotype-phenotype correlation was observed in the OPPN patients.
To date, more than 2000 different NF1 mutations have been identified in Human Gene Mutation Database . The NF1 gene has one of the highest mutation rates, and different populations have different sets of recurrent exonic mutations [6, 16, 17]. Our study detected 6 novel mutations in 26 OPPN patients among 12 families. Of note, an intron mutation (NF1:Ch17: 29665038: T > A) was identified in the patients of the 10th family. Although two patients shared this mutation and this mutation was not present in unaffected individuals, we cannot confirm whether this intronic mutation is related to the pathogenesis of OPPN. We performed a literature review as well as a comparison of NF1 mutations in Chinese and patients from other parts of the world [16, 17]. The results indicated that the missense mutation rate in Italian patients (58.9%) was significantly higher (all p = 0.01) than in Korean (38.5%) and Chinese (21.4%) patients (Table 3). To date, there has been little evidence with regard to the genotype-phenotype correlation in NF1. Although OPPN patients in one family share a common NF1 mutation, symptoms can vary greatly. This might be due to differences in age, sex and other epigenetic factors . For example, a family-based association study revealed a strong association between the lncRNA ANRIL and the number of plexiform neurofibromas .
Among NF1 patients, 35–60% of cases are familial and others sporadic [16, 17]. We initially enrolled 34 patients, including 32 (94.12%) familial and 2 (5.89%) sporadic cases. However, two sporadic cases were excluded due to loss of contact; thus, all of the OPPN cases were hereditary. The percentage of familial NF in out study was much higher than that previously reported, which could be partially explained by the following reasons: 1) increased awareness of this disease for hereditary cases, 2) selection bias with a sample size of 26 OPPNs and 3) OPPNs presented with higher genetic predisposition than did other types of NFs.
This study should be regarded as an initial exploration of the clinical characteristics and genetic patterns of Chinese patients with OPPN. Caution should be taken when interpreting the findings due to the following limitations. The sample size was small, though the low incidence of this disease makes it difficult to recruit a larger cohort of patients. In addition, this study was conducted in a single tertiary institution, and all participants were of Chinese Han ethnicity. All these factors may cause selection bias, and our findings may not be generalizable to all Chinese OPPN patients. Thus, we will continue to seek data sets from other medical centres for future validation studies. Nevertheless, we attempted to circumvent these limitations as follows: our study is the largest cohort of Chinese patients with familial OPPN to date, and this study involved a single surgeon and used objective statistical methods, which help to minimize selection and confounding biases.
Earlier onset and more severe symptoms were displayed in successive generations of patients with heritable OPPN. Special attention should be paid to the successive generations of OPPN patients. Considering that some of the detected mutations were novel, comprehensive NF1 mutation analysis is valuable for genetic counselling. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed clinical characteristics and the NF1 mutation spectrum for Chinese patients with heritable OPPN. Therefore, a larger cohort from multiple clinical centres is required to fully validate our findings.
Availability of data and materials
The raw sequencing data have been uploaded as supplementary files. The datasets analysed during the current study are available in the ClinVAR database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/, accession number: VCV000638015, VCV000635821, VCV000635820, VCV000635819, VCV000635818 and VCV000186215).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Magnetic resonance imaging
Neurofibromatosis type 1
Ars E, et al. A clinical variant of neurofibromatosis type 1: familial spinal neurofibromatosis with a frameshift mutation in the NF1 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:834–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/301803.
Buske A, et al. Recurrent NF1 gene mutation in a patient with oligosymptomatic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Am J Med Genet. 1999;86:328–30.
Campian J, Gutmann DH. CNS tumors in Neurofibromatosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2378–85. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7199.
Duman N, Elmas M. Dermoscopy of cutaneous neurofibromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:529–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.021.
Farris SR, Grove AS Jr. Orbital and eyelid manifestations of neurofibromatosis: a clinical study and literature review. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;12:245–59.
Avery RA, et al. Orbital/periorbital plexiform Neurofibromas in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1: multidisciplinary recommendations for care. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:123–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.020.
Coyle JT. Orbital optic glioma in neurofibromatosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:720–1.
Seiff SR, et al. Orbital optic glioma in neurofibromatosis. Magnetic resonance diagnosis of perineural arachnoidal gliomatosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1689–92.
Consoli C, et al. Gonosomal mosaicism for a nonsense mutation (R1947X) in the NF1 gene in segmental neurofibromatosis type 1. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:463–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X 23834.x (2005).
Bonatti F, et al. Patterns of novel alleles and genotype/phenotype correlations resulting from the analysis of 108 previously undetected mutations in patients affected by Neurofibromatosis type I. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18102071.
Blakeley JO, Plotkin SR. Therapeutic advances for the tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18:624–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov200.
Yapijakis C, Adamopoulou M, Tasiouka K, Voumvourakis C, Stranjalis G. Mutation screening of Her-2, N-ras and Nf1 genes in brain tumor biopsies. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:4607–11. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11010.
Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:575–8.
Colabella C, et al. Merging FT-IR and NGS for simultaneous phenotypic and genotypic identification of pathogenic Candida species. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188104.
Banerjee S, et al. A novel mutation in NF1 is associated with diverse intra-familial phenotypic variation and astrocytoma in a Chinese family. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;31:182–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.034.
Cali F, et al. Mutation spectrum of NF1 gene in Italian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 using ion torrent PGM platform. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60:93–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.11.001.
Ko JM, Sohn YB, Jeong SY, Kim HJ, Messiaen LM. Mutation spectrum of NF1 and clinical characteristics in 78 Korean patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48:447–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol 02.004 (2013).
Li Z, Yu X, Shen J. ANRIL: a pivotal tumor suppressor long non-coding RNA in human cancers. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:5657–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4808-5.
Mussotter T, et al. Non-coding RNA ANRIL and the number of plexiform neurofibromas in patients with NF1 microdeletions. BMC Med Genet. 2012;13:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-13-98.
Thank you for the invaluable devotion of all participants in this study.
XQF, RBJ and YFW conceived and designed the study; PWC and CDZ was responsible for patient data; YFW and YXL presented during data collection; YXL and PWC performed the study in the laboratory; YFW and RBJ conducted data analyses; PWC wrote the first draft, and it reviewed by RBJ and XQF. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81570884, 81770961), the SMC-ChenXing Yong Scholar Program (2016, Class A) and the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (20152223), and Innovation Fund for Translational Medicine (15ZH1005), Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine (BXJ201834). The funders had no role in the design of the study or in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from Shanghai Jiaotong University. For all samples, only non-identifiable information is presented. Written, informed consent was obtained for all involved patients. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their guardians at the follow-up visit.
Consent for publication
Written, informed consent was obtained for all involved patients. A form letter containing the carrier screening agreement for children younger than 18 years old was signed by their parents.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chai, P., Luo, Y., Zhou, C. et al. Clinical characteristics and mutation Spectrum of NF1 in 12 Chinese families with orbital/periorbital plexiform Neurofibromatosis type 1. BMC Med Genet 20, 158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-019-0877-9