Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Identification and in silico characterization of a novel p.P208PfsX1 mutation in V-ATPase a3 subunit associated with autosomal recessive osteopetrosis in a Pakistani family

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:148

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-017-0506-4

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 11 August 2017
  • Accepted: 29 November 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Osteopetrosis is a rare inherited bone disorder mainly described as an increased bone density caused by defective osteoclastic bone resorption. To date, genetic variants of eleven genes have been reported so far to be associated with different types of osteopetrosis. However, malignant infantile osteopetrosis, a lethal form of the disease, is mostly (50%) caused by mutation(s) in TCIRG1 gene. In this study, we investigated a consanguineous Pakistani family clinically and genetically to elucidate underlying molecular basis of the infantile osteopetrosis.

Methods

DNA samples from five family members were subjected to SNP-array based whole genome homozygosity mapping. Data was analyzed and potentially pathogenic mutation was identified by Sanger sequencing of two affected as well as three phenotypically healthy individuals in the family. The significance of identified pathogenic variation and its impact on protein structure and function was studied using various bioinformatics tools.

Results

DNA samples from five family members were subjected to genome-wide SNP array genotyping and homozygosity mapping which identified ~4 Mb region on chr11 harboring the TCIRG1 gene. Sanger sequencing unveiled a novel homozygous deletion c. 624delC in exon 6 of the TCIRG1 gene encodes a3 subunit of V-ATPase complex. The identified deletion resulted in a frame shift producing a truncated protein of 208 aa. In silico analysis of premature termination of the a3 subunit of V-ATPase complex revealed deleterious effects on the protein structure, predicting impaired or complete loss of V-ATPase function causing infantile osteopetrosis.

Conclusions

Since a3 subunit of V-ATPase complex plays a crucial role in bone resorption process, structurally abnormal a3 subunit might have adversely affected bone resorption process, leading to infantile osteopetrosis in Pakistani family. Therefore, the present study not only expands the genotypic spectrum of osteopetrosis but also improve understandings of the role of V-ATPase a3 subunit in bone resorption process. Moreover, our findings should help in genetic counseling and provide further insight into the disease pathogenesis and potential targeted therapy.

Keywords

  • Infantile malignant osteopetrosis
  • Human TCIRG1 gene
  • V-ATPase
  • V0 domain
  • a3 subunit

Background

Osteopetrosis (OPT) is a rare genetic disorder of bones, first reported in early 1904 [1]. Abnormally dense bone mass is a characteristic feature of osteopetrosis caused by a defective Osteoclastic bone resorption [2]. The condition lead to bone fragility and an increased vulnerability to fractures [3]. Four sub-types of OPT are described including infantile malignant OPT (OPTB1), adult/ benign OPT, intermediate OPT and carbon anhydrase type II deficiency syndrome [4]. However, Syndromic forms of osteopetrosis such as carbonic anhydrase 2 deficiency are not considered as classic autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) due to the mild presentation of the bone defect in affected patients [2]. Modes of inheritance further split osteopetrosis into autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive categories [5]. However, infantile malignant OPT, also known as autosomal recessive osteopetrosis type 1, remains the most common and best identified subtypes with an average disease frequency of 1/ 250,000 (1/200,000–1/300,000). The highest frequencies of infantile malignant OPT has been reported in populations of Costa-Rica (3.4/100,000) in Central American and Chuvash (1/3879 newborns) in Russia owing to a founder effect, high parental consanguinity or geographic isolation [2, 6].

Infantile malignant OPT is associated with intermediate and severe clinical phenotypes associated with reduced or complete loss of bone resorption capability of osteoclasts [7]. Impaired osteoclastic bone resorption leads to retention of old bones, hence an increase in bone density and obstruction of internal cavities containing vital tissues/organs such as bone marrow, nervous system etc. Distinctive symptoms include short stature, bone deformities and pathological fractures that may accompanied by severe hematological and neural failures [8]. In comparison with autosomal dominant benign OPT that occurs in late ages and with less severe clinical consequences, autosomal recessive infantile malignant OPT involves an early onset and lethal outcome [9]. The mortality rate of autosomal recessive OPT is significantly high during the first 2 years of life. Bone marrow failure, visual impairment and profuse infections before the age of 3 months are the major contributing factors to death [7].

Bone resorption depends on osteoclast secretion of hydrogen ions (H+), chloride ions (Cl−) and matrix-degrading protease, cathepsin K, into the resorption lacunae. The process mainly involves the breakdown of crystalline hydroxyapatite and collagen-rich organic bone matrix. The breakdown of both components requires acidic conditions, because hydroxyapatite is solubilized in acidic solution and the collagen-degrading protease, cathepsin K, is optimally active at acidic pH. Therefore, the bone surface acidic microenvironment beneath the ruffled border is a fundamental and crucial step for bone resorption. A continuous expulsion of H+ and Cl − through combined actions of V-ATPase proton pump and chloride channel in the ruffled border of osteoclasts serves to achieve this acidic microenvironment in resorptive lacunae. The degraded bone matrix is endocytosed from the resorption lacunae and finally released into the extracellular environment [10, 11]. The proton pump function of multi-subunit V-ATPase is tightly regulated by different genes whose pathogenic variants are frequently reported in impaired proton pump regulation. To date, 11 osteopetrosis genes have been identified including 7 genes associated with ARO; TCIRG1, CLCN7, OSTM1, SNX10, TNFSFR11A, TNFSF11 and PLEKHM1 [2, 5]. Four of the known ARO genes, TCIRG1, CLCN7, OSTM1 and SNX10 are significantly expressed in ruffled border of mature osteoclasts and are largely known for their involvement in autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Specific proteins encoded by these genes are part of the osteoclast-specific enzymatic system that significantly contributes in bone dissolution process. The TCIRG1 encodes a3 subunit of proton pump, is the most frequently mutated gene responsible for >50% of ARO cases. The CLCN7 gene encodes chloride channel (CLC-7) to provide electro-neutrality during acidification process, account for approximately 13–16% of ARO cases. Mutations in a recently cloned OSTM1 gene which encode transmembrane protein 1, lead to severe phenotypes and account for 2–6% ARO cases. Whereas, SNX10 gene encodes sorting nexin 10, is accounting for almost 4% ARO cases. Overall, approximately >70% malignant infantile osteopetrosis cases emerge from mutations in these four genes. The remaining 3 gene are less frequently described in ARO patients with TNFSFR11A in <1–4% of cases, TNFSF11 in <1–3% of cases and only 2 cases of PLEKHM1 have been reported in the literature so far [2].

Though the incidence of disorder is worldwide without any gender specificity, it is frequently reported in ethnic groups with increased consanguinity [7]. Pakistan is also a country where consanguinity is being practiced over hundreds of years by highly conserved ethnic groups [12]. As a result, variety of inherited bone disorders including osteopetrosis can easily be identified. Unfortunately, no significant work has been carried out so far to identify molecular basis of osteopetrosis in Pakistani population. In the present study, a multi-generational consanguineous Pakistani family suffering from infantile osteopetrosis was clinically and genetically characterized. Genetic screening revealed a novel homozygous deletion mutation in V-ATPase a3 subunit associated with autosomal recessive osteopetrosis in this Pakistani family.

Methods

Subjects

A multi-generational consanguineous family with a history of osteopetrosis was identified from a secluded area of KPK province of Pakistan (Fig. 1). Two affected siblings, ages between 1 and 3 years, were presented with characteristic features of osteopetrosis while their parents and a sibling identified phenotypically healthy. Family members were consented to participate in the study and their blood samples were drawn. Blood samples were also collected from 100 ethnically-matched unrelated normal individuals to be used as a control for allele frequency calculation and confirmation of disease-associated mutation. Genomic DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells was extracted by standard phenol-chloroform-based DNA extraction procedure [13]. The study was approved by institutional ethic committee (Ethical Committee, IB&GE Islamabad, Pakistan (Ref. No. IBGE/IEC/18/01/16) and was in concordance with the Helsinki declaration.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The ARO family pedigree & clinical presentation of patients. Upper panel; Pedigree of consanguineous multi-generation Pakistani family demonstrating segregation of osteopetrosis as an autosomal recessive trait. Lower panel; (a) Patient IV-1, a 3-year-old boy with craniofacial symptoms showing exophthalmoses (b) macrocephaly, frontal bossing, flat nasal bridge and hypertelorism (c) protuberance of abdomen due to hepatosplenomegaly (d) limb deformities and muscle wasting. (e) Patient IV-3, a 1-year-old boy with less severe skeletal features including macrocephaly, flat nasal bridge with hypertelorism and mild exophthalmos

SNP genotyping and homozygosity mapping

DNA samples from five family members (two affected siblings, one unaffected sibling and their parents) were genotyped on the Illumina OmniExpress v1.1 BeadChip array for a total of 712,526 genetic markers. After removal of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were non-polymorphic or failed genotyping in at least one sample within the pedigree, 314,385 SNPs were further analyzed. We confirmed the reported familial relationships among all five genotyped samples using identity-by-descent analysis on PLINK [14]. To identify homozygous segments (>1 Mb in length) that are shared between the two affected individuals but not with any unaffected individual, homozygosity mapping was conducted using PLINK v1.07 and Homozygosity Mapper using the default settings (http://homozygositymapper.org /).

Mutation screening

Intronic primers (see Additional file 1: Table S1) were designed to amplify exons and adjacent splice site sequences to identify any potential disease associated variant of TCIRG1 gene. Amplified PCR products were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, U.K.) and subjected to sequencing by using BigDye®Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit on an ABI3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, U.S.A.). Potential disease-associated mutation was confirmed by bidirectional sequencing, allele-specific PCR and assessing hundred control samples having similar ethnic background.

Sequence acquisition

Reference sequences of TCIRG1 gene (NG_007878.1), coding nucleotides (NM_006019.3) and amino acids (NP_006010.2) were retrieved through NCBI database.

Mutation analysis by allele-specific PCR

The identified deletion mutation in exon 6 of TCIRG1 was further validated by using allele-specific primers that were designed to match wild-type sequences (see Additional file 1: Table S2). In a single reaction, one allele-specific inner primer (forward or reverse) was used in combination with two common outer primers to amplify the candidate region. Amplification was achieved in a 25 μl final reaction volume containing 200 ng genomic DNA, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase and 0.6 μM of each primer. Amplification was performed with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 45 s, primer-specific annealing temperature for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. In the present study we used allele-specific inner forward primer only and amplified products were separated on 2% agarose gel and genotypes were called by visual inspection. To understand expected outcomes of allele-specific amplification against different possible genetic makeup, a key is proposed (see Additional file 1: Table S3).

Bioinformatics analysis

To predict secondary as well as three dimensional (3D) structures of the wild-type and mutant TCIRG1 protein, Psipred and I-Tasser bioinformatics tools were used respectively [15, 16]. Protein 3D–models reliability was checked using RAMPAGE server and visualized through ViewerLite v5.0 [17]. STITCH4 database was used to predict functional protein partners [18]. Pockets/interaction sites of protein were identified using Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins (CASTp) [19, 20]. Docking analysis was carried out using PatchDock server [21, 22]. The refinement of first 10 docked complexes, obtained through PatchDock, was carried out using FireDock [23, 24]. Representations (2-Dimensional) and analysis of protein-ligand interaction complexes was done using LIGPLOT [25].

Results

Clinical investigations

Though all typical symptoms of the disease were not manifested at the time of birth, possibility of inborn genetic defect could not be excluded. The first comprehensive clinical examination of affected individuals IV: 1 and IV: 3 (Fig. 1) was carried out during the first 5 months of their infancy. Both affected individuals’ revealed typical signs and symptoms attributed to malignant infantile osteopetrosis. Severity of the clinical manifestations was significantly varied between the two individuals. According to the information provided by physician and parents of affected individuals, at the time of first clinical evaluation, individual IV: 1 was presented with marked retardation of growth and development and his length and weight were below the 3rd percentile for age. Other physical findings included macrocephaly with head size >98th percentile for age. Frontal bossing, bilateral exophthalmos, absent pupillary light reflexes and minimum response to auditory stimuli were also the clinical observations. He also had marked hepatosplenomegaly. Patient IV: 3 has length at 25th percentile for age and weight at 50th percentile. He had almost normal skull size. There was mild hepatosplenomegaly. He was completely non-responder to visual stimuli and response to auditory stimuli was almost normal. He had flat nasal bridge with hypertelorism and mild exophthalmos.

At the time of second clinical evaluation when the family was enrolled for this study, individuals IV: 1, a 3-years-old boy (Fig. 1a-d) was presented with macrocephaly measuring occipital frontal circumference (OFC) 58 CM and prominent frontal bossing. Eye features presented severe exophthalmos with exposure keratitis leading to gradual visual loss of both eyes. Other craniofacial abnormalities were including the flattened nasal bridge and misaligned teeth with dental caries. Abdomen was grossly distended with everted umbilicus and tense with massive hepatosplenomegaly. He also had marked muscle wasting, more obvious in the lower limbs, with multiple bruises on the shins. Radiological findings revealed abnormalities with diffusely thickened and sclerotic skull along with an increased density of the rest of visualized bone (Fig. 2a). The chest x-rays also support the osteoporotic features as diffuse increase in bone density in ribs, visualized dorosolumber spine and pelvic bones is prominent. Widening of costochondral junctions is also present (Fig 2b).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Radiological investigations. a Individual IV: 1; image shows diffusely thickened and sclerotic skull with increased density of visualized bones b Prominent diffuse increase in bone density in ribs, visualized dorosolumber spine and pelvic bones as well as widening of costochondral junctions. c Individual IV: 3, image shows diffuse dense calvarium with increased density of rest of the visualized bones d Generalized diffuse increase in bone density, mild scoliosis of dorsal spine with convexity towards left side and loss of corticomedullary differentiation

The individuals IV: 3, a 1-year-old boy (Fig. 1e), a diagnosed case of osteopetrosis, had mild/borderline macrocephaly measuring occipital frontal circumference (OFC) 50 CM with patent anterior fontanelle. He had flat nasal bridge with hypertelorism and mild exophthalmos. Radiological investigations (X-rays) are suggestive of osteopetrotic phenotype as evidenced by abnormally dense culvarium along with increased density of rest of the visualized bones (Fig. 2c), generalized diffuse increase in bone density, widening of costochondral junctions along with loss of corticomedullary differentiation and undertubularization seen in visualized humeri (Fig. 2d). Some disease associated features like teeth anomalies, progressive deafness and frontal bossing could not significantly be concluded in this patient due to an early death at the age of 1 year as a result of pneumonia leading to congestive heart failure.

SNP genotyping & mutation analysis of TCIRG1 gene

SNP-based genotyping and homozygosity mapping revealed multiple regions of shared homozygosity (among two affected individuals only) on different chromosomes. While comparing identified homozygosity regions with previously reported loci, we came up with a 3.97 Mb region on chromosome 11 harboring the TCIRG1 gene that has been previously reported to be mutated in autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (see Additional file 1: Figure S1, Figure S2, Table S4, Table S5).

Sanger sequencing of available family member (Fig 3a) revealed a novel homozygous cytosine deletion in exon 6 of the TCIRG1 (c.624delC) in both affected individuals. Both parents and a sibling were found heterozygous for this deletion (Fig. 3b). PCR amplification with common outer primers, and a combination of outer and an allele-specific inner forward primer further validated the Sanger sequencing results. The fragments of sizes 478 bp/479 bp and 269 bp were observed in heterozygous carriers while only one fragment of 478 bp was observed in homozygous patients. The differentiation between 478 bp and 479 bp DNA fragments was not possible due to the resolution limitation with 2% agarose gel, that’s why they were observed as a single band (Fig. 3c). The presence of allele-specific band (269 bp) in carrier individuals and its absence in affected subjects confirms homozygous deletion of a nucleotide. In the present study allele-specific inner reverse primer was not used (see Additional file 1: Table S3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Mutation analysis. a Branch of the affected family subjected to mutation analysis. b Sanger sequencing of exon 6 of the TCIRG1 gene illustrating c.624delC (p.P208PfsX1) variation. The affected individuals are homozygous for this deletion, whereas phenotypically normal parents are found heterozygous having normal as well as mutant allele. Site of variation is indicated by arrow. c Allele-specific amplification is also supporting the homozygous deletion mutation as allele-specific band of 269 bp is present in carrier individuals (III-6, III-7, IV-2) while absent in affected subjects (IV-1 & IV-3)

The identified mutation was not observed in public databases or in any of the 100 control samples. The results were therefore, consistent with the recessive mode of disease segregation in this family.

Comparative protein modeling and in silico analysis

Comparative analysis of secondary structures features of the wild and mutant types unveiled that the normal protein comprises of 27 helices, 12 strands and 39 coils. Whereas, a single nucleotide deletion resulted in gross changes in the 3D–protein structure as determined by decrease in the total numbers of helices, strands and coils to 6, 3, and 10, respectively. The impact of the deletion has been illustrated in a graphical comparison of secondary structure features of both, the wild-type and mutant proteins (see Additional file 1: Figure S3). Likewise, the differences in number of helices, beta sheets and coils produced as a result of mutation, have been demonstrated in 3D–models of wild- type and mutant respectively (Fig. 4a-b). Using STITCH4 database, we identified a ligand protein ATPase V1 subunit B1 for having high level of interaction affinity to receptor protein. ATPase V1B1 is also responsible for acidifying a variety of intracellular compartments in eukaryotic cells. Protein docking study explains the protein-protein complexes of small ATPV1B1 protein molecule with macromolecules i.e. wild-type and mutant a3 subunits respectively (Fig. 4c-d). Docking complexes are formed due to the hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions between molecules at specific interaction sites/pockets. Part A & B of the Fig. 5 demonstrates the possible docking interaction of ligand protein with wild-type and mutant a3 subunit respectively. Different amino acid residues from receptor and ligand proteins are involved in hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. These interactions showed that amino acid residue Tyr583 from wild-type a3 subunit is engaged in hydrogen bonding with Gly40 residue of the ligand protein for docking complex (Fig 5a). Whereas, in case of mutated a3 subunit, the residues Cys25, Arg28 and Asp54 are involved in hydrogen bonding with Asp26 and Ala69 residues of ligand protein (Fig 5b). Amino acid residues involved in hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions are summarized in Table 1. Significant dislocation and change in hydrogen bonding pattern, hydrophobic interaction sites and amino acid residues involved in receptor-ligand complexes, clearly implicate the pathogenic nature of deletion mutation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

3D–Models. a Normal TCIRG1 b Mutant TCIRG1 (p.P208PfsX1). Docking complex visualization: c TCIRG1 vs ATPV1B1 d Mutant TCIRG1 vs ATPV1B1. Receptor protein has been shown in solid ribbon display style with green color; ligand has been shown in secondary type with yellow color

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

2D–DimPlot representation of docking interaction. a Normal TCIRG1 with ATPV1B1. b Mutant TCIRG1 with ATPV1B1. Receptor and ligand residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are represented by brick red and pink spoke arcs ( ) respectively. Hydrogen bonding is shown by green dotted lines ( ). Receptor residues involved in hydrogen bonding are labeled in olive green color. Ligand residues involved in hydrogen bonding are labeled in pink color

Table 1

Docking interactions: amino acid residues involved in hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions

Receptor-Ligand

Hydrogen Bonding

Hydrophobic Interactions

Figure

Ligand Residues

Receptor Residues

Ligand Residues

Receptor Residues

TCIRG1- ATPV1B1

Gly40

Tyr583

Thr12 Tyr13 Ile14 Ser15 Pro17 Phe20 Thr39 Arg41 Val50 Ser51 Ile57 Glu61 Glu62 Thr63 Gly65 Leu66 Ala69 Thr70

His409 Met420 Val421 Leu422 His526 Leu527 Asn531 Met535 His559 Phe560 Leu580 Ohe581 Leu584 Ile589

Fig. 5a

Mutant TCIRG1- ATPV1B1

Asp2Ala69

Cys2Arg28Asp54

Glu7 Gly10 Ala24 Lys25 Leu27 Ala28 Try29 Gly30 Ala31 Val33 Asp34 Ile35 Val42 Gly44 Gly45 Gln46 Tyr54 Val59 Glu61 Leu68 Thr70 Ser72 Ser74 Leu75

Val13 Gln14 Leu15 Phe16 Gln48 Arg50 Arg57 Cys58 Leu61 Phe65 Pro81 Pro82 Lys83 Gly84 Arg85 Pro87 Arg92

Fig. 5b

Discussion

Bone resorption process requires a constant secretion of acid (H+) into the resorption lacunae mediated by V-ATPase proton pump [10]. The V-ATPase proton pump is multi-subunits membrane complex consisting of two main domains; a cytosolic hydrolytic domain (V1) that mediates ATP hydrolysis and a transmembrane proton translocation domain (V0) that facilitates extracellular acidification of organelles [10, 26]. Mutations, deletions or genes knockdown of different subunits of the V-ATPase complex have been described to be implicated in impaired osteoclastic bone resorption, leading to severe osteopetrosis [27]. Approximately 50% of the patients with recessive infantile malignant osteopetrosis have mutations to a3 subunit of V-ATPase protein complex, encoded by TCIRG1 gene [28]. To date, over hundred pathogenic variations of TCIRG1 gene including twenty small deletion mutations have been reported to be associated with impaired a3 subunit function, hence infantile malignant osteopetrosis (HGMD; www.hgmd.org).

In the present study we identified a homozygous deletion mutation (c. 624delC) in exon 6 of the TCIRG1 gene and to the best of our knowledge it has not been reported before. The deletion led to a frame shift that created a stop codon at position downstream next to the point of deletion. Hence, resulted premature truncated protein consists of 208 aa instead of normal 830 aa (p.P208PfsX1). In other words there is a loss of 622 aa at C-terminal domain of a3 subunit. The occurrence of deletion in homozygous state in all affected subjects, heterozygous state in both carrier parents and absence in a screen of 100 ethnically matched healthy controls confirms its association with infantile malignant osteopetrosis in Pakistani family.

In silico characterization of the deletion mutation revealed significant consequences on the secondary structure features of mutant type protein (see Additional file 1: Figure S3). Premature termination not only led to an abnormal shorter protein of 208 aa but also resulted in atypically reduced numbers of structural motives like alpha helices, strands and coils. Structural changes might have resulted in amino acid re-arrangement and conformational changes so that the receptor-ligand interaction trend of mutant a3 subunit is predicted totally different from that of wild-type a3 subunits (Fig. 4c-d). The 2-dimensional protein-ligand interaction complexes predicted hydrogen bonding between Tyr583 of wild-type receptor and Gly40 of ligand molecule ATPV1B1. Whereas, in case of mutant protein, the residues Cys25, Arg28 and Asp54 are involved in hydrogen bonding with Asp26 and Ala69 residues of protein-ligand (Fig. 5a-b). Significantly dislocated interaction sites and amino acid residues have also disturbed the hydrophobic interactions that are equally important in receptor-ligand interactions. Location of interaction sites and number of interactive pockets, involvement of different amino acid residues as well as hydrogen bonding pattern are in Table 1.

Topological studies propose a two-domain structure for “a3 subunit” with an N-terminal cytosolic domain necessary to target V-ATPase to the plasma membrane of osteoclasts, and a membrane integral C-terminal domain that make structural frame work of V0 domain and affects the coupling of proton transport and ATP hydrolysis [10, 29]. In the present study, loss of 622 aa at C-terminal of a3 subunit strongly suggests impaired proton coupling, transportation and ATP hydrolysis even if it is supposed that the N-terminal with 208 aa targets V-ATPase to the plasma membrane of osteoclasts. It can also be hypothesized that partially translated a3 subunit may have been degraded by “nonsense mediated mRNA decay” [26], resulting in a complete loss of a3 subunit. In either situation, there is a strong possibility of V-ATPase complex assembly disruption, leading to clinical phenotypes of osteopetrosis.

Conclusions

In summary, the mutant a3 isoform might have caused V-ATPase complex assembly to be disrupted, resulted in osteoclast failure to maintain extracellular acidification and hence defective bone resorption attributed to infantile malignant osteopetrosis. Our results, supported by SNP genotyping, Sanger sequencing, allele-specific PCR and bioinformatics have not only expanded the spectrum of TCIRG1 pathogenic variations but also the body of evidences supporting the role of a3 isoform in osteopetrosis. Moreover, our findings may be supportive for prenatal genetic screening and early diagnosis of osteopetrosis.

Abbreviations

ADO: 

Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis

ARO: 

Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis

OFC: 

Occipital frontal circumference

OPT: 

Osteopetrosis

OPTB1: 

Malignant infantile osteopetrosis 1

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients and their family members who contributed in this study. We are also grateful to Dr. M. Rizwan Alam and Mr. Syed Husnain Haider for technical assistance.

Funding

The sample collection and clinical work was supported by Government of Pakistan funding to IBGE. The SNP genotyping was supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore (to C.C.K.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional information files.

Authors’ contributions

MA designed the study, performed experimental work, paper writing and drafting, AM provided protein modelling expertise and paper writing, SW provided clinical expertise, CCK, JNF and SS did the SNP array data analysis and report writing, MK helped in sample collection and clinical evaluation, SAM participated in paper drafting and assisted in study design, MN participated in data analysis, paper editing, formatting and finalization. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of Institute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering Islamabad, Pakistan (Ref. No. IBGE/IEC/18/01/16). The study conforms to the principles of the declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent from participants, in the case of children from their parents, was obtained using institutional consent form.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient/parents of the patients who were minors. Copies of the consent forms are available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering, 24-Mauve area, G-9/1, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
(2)
Department of Biotechnology, International Islamic university, Islamabad, Pakistan
(3)
KRL General Hospital, Pediatric Department 24-Mauve area, G-9/1, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
(4)
Human Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore
(5)
Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
(6)
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
(7)
Department of Biochemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

References

  1. Hamdan A, Nabulsi MM, Farhat FT, Haidar RK, Fuleihan NS. When bone becomes marble: head and neck manifestations of osteopetrosis. Paediatr Child Health. 2006;11:37–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Sobacchi C, Schulz A, Coxon FP, Villa A, Helfrich MH. Osteopetrosis: genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:522–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng X, McDonald JM. Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:121–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Lam DK, Sandor GK, Holmes HI, Carmichael RP, Clokie CM. Marble bone disease: a review of osteopetrosis and its oral health implications for dentists. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:839–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zeng B, Li R, Hu Y, Hu B, Zhao Q, Liu H, Yuan P, Wang Y. A novel mutation and a known mutation in the CLCN7 gene associated with relatively stable infantile malignant osteopetrosis in a Chinese patient. Gene. 2016;576:176–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bliznetz EA, Tverskaya SM, Zinchenko RA, Abrukova AV, Savaskina EN, Nikulin MV, Kirillov AG, Ginter EK, Polyakov AV. Genetic analysis of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis in Chuvashiya: the unique splice site mutation in TCIRG1 gene spread by the founder effect. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:664–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Wilson CJ, Vellodi A. Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis: diagnosis, management, and outcome. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:449–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Fattore A, Capannolo M, Teti A. New mechanisms of osteopetrosis. IBMS BoneKEy. 2009;6:16–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Palagano E, Blair HC, Pangrazio A, Tourkova I, Strina D, Angius A, Cuccuru G, Oppo M, Uva P, Van Hul W, et al. Buried in the middle but guilty: Intronic mutations in the TCIRG1 gene cause human Autosomal recessive Osteopetrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:1814–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Qin A, Cheng TS, Pavlos NJ, Lin Z, Dai KR, Zheng MH. V-ATPases in osteoclasts: structure, function and potential inhibitors of bone resorption. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:1422–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Warman ML, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Krakow D, Lachman R, LeMerrer M, Mortier G, Mundlos S, Nishimura G, Rimoin DL, et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:943–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hussain R, Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30:261–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning. New York: Cold spring harbor laboratory press; 1989.Google Scholar
  14. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:404–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:725–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, de Bakker PI, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins: Struct, Funct Bioinformatics. 2003;50:437–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhn M, Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Bork P. STITCH 3: zooming in on protein-chemical interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D876–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Binkowski TA, Naghibzadeh S, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3352–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W116–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Duhovny D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Efficient Unbound Docking of Rigid Molecules. In: Guigó R, Gusfield D, (eds). Algorithms in Bioinformatics. WABI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2452. Berlin: Springer; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45784-4_14.
  22. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W363–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins. 2007;69:139–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mashiach E, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FireDock: a web server for fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W229–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8:127–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yuan P, Yue Z, Sun L, Huang W, Hu B, Yang Z, Hu Y, Xiao H, Shi H, Zhou Q, Wang Y. Novel mutation of TCIRG1 and clinical pictures of two infantile malignant osteopetrosis patients. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29:251–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Qin A, Cheng TS, Lin Z, Pavlos NJ, Jiang Q, Xu J, Dai KR, Zheng MH. Versatile roles of V-ATPases accessory subunit Ac45 in osteoclast formation and function. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27155.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Moscatelli I, Thudium CS, Flores C, Schulz A, Askmyr M, Gudmann NS, Andersen NM, Porras O, Karsdal MA, Villa A. Lentiviral gene transfer of TCIRG1 into peripheral blood CD34+ cells restores osteoclast function in infantile malignant osteopetrosis. Bone. 2013;57:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jefferies KC, Cipriano DJ, Forgac M. Function, structure and regulation of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPases. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;476:33–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Medical Genetics

ISSN: 1471-2350

Contact us