Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Abnormal primary and permanent dentitions with ectodermal symptoms predict WNT10A deficiency

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:88

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-016-0349-4

Received: 29 April 2016

Accepted: 15 November 2016

Published: 24 November 2016

Abstract

Background

The WNT10A protein is critical for the development of ectodermal appendages. Variants in the WNT10A gene may be associated with a spectrum of ectodermal abnormalities including extensive tooth agenesis.

Methods

In seven patients with severe tooth agenesis we identified anomalies in primary dentition and additional ectodermal symptoms, and assessed WNT10A mutations by genetic analysis.

Results

Investigation of primary dentition revealed peg-shaped crowns of primary mandibular incisors and three individuals had agenesis of at least two primary teeth. The permanent dentition was severely affected in all individuals with a mean of 21 missing teeth. Primary teeth were most often present in positions were succedaneous teeth were missing. Furthermore, most existing molars had taurodontism. Light, brittle or coarse hair was reported in all seven individuals, hyperhidrosis of palms and soles in six individuals and nail anomalies in two individuals. The anomalies in primary dentition preceded most of the additional ectodermal symptoms. Genetic analysis revealed that all seven individuals were homozygous or compound heterozygous for WNT10A mutations resulting in C107X, E222X and F228I.

Conclusions

We conclude that tooth agenesis and/or peg-shaped crowns of primary mandibular incisors, severe oligodontia of permanent dentition as well as ectodermal symptoms of varying severity may be predictors of bi-allelic WNT10A mutations of importance for diagnosis, counselling and follow-up.

Keywords

WNT10A mutationsEctodermal dysplasiaDentalPrimary dentitionPermanent dentition

Background

The WNT10A (Wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 10A) gene is a member of the WNT gene family that has been implicated in oncogenesis and in several developmental processes including tooth formation [1, 2]. Bi-allelic WNT10A mutations cause a spectrum of symptoms from ectodermal appendages. Patients may present with nail dystrophy, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, hyperhidrosis as well as hypohidrosis, sparse or brittle hair, eye-lid cysts and keratoconus in different combinations and severity in a continuum of phenotypes [36]. In some cases the constellation of features may be defined as a specific clinical entity among the ectodermal dysplasias (EDs), e.g., odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia (OODD; OMIM 257980) or Schöpf-Schultz-Passarge syndrome (SSPS; OMIM 224750) [35, 7]. The most consistent and specific symptom in cases with either bi-allelic or mono-allelic WNT10A mutations reported to date is tooth agenesis of the permanent dentition [3, 4, 6, 814]. Studies of patients with non-syndromic oligodontia (agenesis of 6–28 teeth) referred for centralized treatments revealed a carrier frequency of up to 56% for WNT10A mutations [8]. However, a population-based study of Swedish individuals with isolated oligodontia revealed that the frequency of at least one WNT10A mutation in non-related probands was 28% [11]. When adding mutations in the genes MSX1, PAX9, AXIN2, EDA, EDAR, and EDARADD in the same material the frequency of genetically verified isolated oligodontia reached 38.3%.

Taken together, independent reports from us and others indicate that WNT10A mutations are the most frequent specific cause of isolated hypodontia (agenesis of at least one tooth), and oligodontia (agenesis of six or more teeth, third molars excluded) of the permanent dentition known to date. The different frequencies in WNT10A associated tooth anomalies in these studies may be related to ethnicity, phenotypic differences and selection criteria of study participants. Noteworthy, mutations in the WNT co-receptor LRP6 gene were recently identified in rare cases of isolated oligodontia bringing further evidence for the importance of WNT10A in tooth development [15].

Bi-allelic WNT10A mutations are usually associated with a larger number of missing teeth when compared to mono-allelic mutations [3, 4, 6, 811, 14]. Noteworthy, the penetrance among heterozygotes is incomplete and a considerable proportion of carriers do not express any tooth anomalies at all [12]. In addition to tooth agenesis, WNT10A variants may cause abnormal shape of both roots and crowns of permanent teeth [16, 17]. Deformities include taurodontism of molars, misshaped crowns and peg-shaped incisors [10, 14, 16, 17]. Taurodontism is a condition in human molars in which the body of the tooth is enlarged vertically at the expense of the roots, causing the pulp chamber to extend apically below the cementoenamel junction [18, 19]. Thus, isolated hypo- or oligodontia, and tapered frontal permanent teeth give reasons to suspect underlying WNT10A mutations. Also, a less disturbed primary dentition with conical frontal teeth was reported by Bohring et al., 2009 [4].

We hypothesized that the combined assessment of primary and permanent dentition as well as search for mild or unnoticed ectodermal symptoms may identify carriers of WNT10A mutations. In this study we present seven individuals with severe tooth anomalies in whom symptoms from other ectodermal appendages were identified. We made a detailed characterization of both the primary and permanent dentition together with symptoms from other ectodermal derivatives. Our aim was to evaluate if abnormalities in both primary and permanent dentitions, together with other ectodermal symptoms, may serve as predictors for WNT10A deficiency of diagnostic importance early in life.

Methods

Clinical investigations

Seven individuals with oligodontia and other ectodermal symptoms diagnosed at the National Oral Disability Centre for Rare Disorders in Jönköping, Sweden, were retrospectively selected when we identified typical abnormalities in their primary dentition. Two of the patients (Ia and Ib) were siblings and the remaining were probands from five families. Three patients were females and four were males. Clinical data were compiled from patient records including photographs and panoramic radiographs. Evaluation of taurodontism of primary or permanent mandibular molars was performed using the method described by Seow and Lai, 1989 [20], using panoramic radiographs to calculate the quotient of crown-body (CB) and root (R) length. We used the threshold value for taurodontism of 0.9 or more as suggested by Kan et al., 2010 [21]. The measure points for CB and R were fixed by two of the authors separately from the molar segments of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. The accuracy of the measuring points were evaluated simultaneously and adjusted by two specialists in dentomaxillofacial radiology before calculation of the CB:R ratio to establish taurodontism. Ectodermal signs and symptoms were compiled from anamnestic data in patient records and by telephone interviews in order to obtain specific information.

Genetic analysis

The patients and their parents were sampled and tested for mutations in the WNT10A gene. All four exons of WNT10A, exon-intron boundaries and 5′ and 3′-UTRs were PCR amplified using primers designed via the Primer3 software (sequences available upon request) and checked with ePCR using the UCSC genome browser. Mutation screening was performed of all coding parts of the WNT10A gene by bi-directional Sanger sequencing using Big Dye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and separated on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems; primers available upon request). Chromatograms were aligned and compared to the reference sequence of the WNT10A gene (NM_025216.2).

Results

Dental characteristics

Three out of the seven individuals (Ia, II and III) had agenesis of primary teeth (range 2–3) including five maxillary and two mandibular lateral incisors, 5% of all primary teeth in the cohort. In four individuals the mandibular primary incisors were present with peg-shaped crowns. In two individuals (II and V) the primary incisors were severely worn and there was no evidence of the original crown shape, and in one (IV) the primary incisors were lost at time of examination. Thus, hypodontia and/or peg-shaped crowns of primary mandibular incisors were identified in 4 out of 7 patients. Furthermore, existing primary maxillary incisors in patients Ia and III were tapered, though less marked than in the mandible. When comparing genders we observed that the number of missing primary teeth was significantly higher among females (females 2.3 ± 0.6, n = 3; males = 0 ± 0, n = 4; p = 0.020).

Clinical documentation including intra- and extraoral photographs, dentograms with both primary and permanent dentitions, and WNT10A mutations are shown in Fig. 1. Individual Ia had no permanent teeth at all, and individual II had only two permanent maxillary central incisors. Examination of the permanent dentition revealed extensive oligodontia with agenesis of 76% of permanent teeth (Fig. 2.). The mean number of missing permanent teeth in all seven individuals was 21.3 (range 15–28) with a distribution of 47% in the maxilla and 53% in the mandible. In the six individuals with some permanent teeth, five had severely tapered maxillary central incisors, nine out of 12 teeth (75%). All seven individuals were missing maxillary lateral incisors, first premolars of both jaws, and mandibular second molars and left central incisors. The most stable teeth, present in all but in individual Ia, were the maxillary central incisors, followed by the canines in both jaws. There was no difference in number of missing permanent teeth when comparing males to females.
Fig. 1

Oral photographs, dentograms and mutations in seven individuals with bi-allelic WNT10A mutations. Intraoral photographs show peg-shaped crowns of the primary mandibular incisors (individuals Ia, Ib, III, and IV) and tapered maxillary primary incisors (individuals Ia and III). Extraoral photographs illustrate a characteristic thin upper lip seen in all but individual Ib. Individuals Ia and Ib are siblings

Fig. 2

Missing permanent teeth in seven individuals with bi-allelic WNT10A mutations (n = 149, mean = 21.3, median = 22, range = 15–28). The number of missing teeth was similar in maxilla and mandible

Taurodontism was investigated in mandibular molars using panoramic radiographs. In total, 11 primary second molars were possible to examine in six individuals; in individual IV the primary molars were partly resorbed. Nine primary molars, 82%, had a score of 0.9 or more. Consequently, six individuals had taurodontism in one or both primary molars. Taurodontism of permanent dentition was confirmed in individual IV where the first molars were fully erupted. He was the only individual where evident taurodontism could be determined by cursory examination. Clinical data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical data in seven individuals with bi-allelic WNT10A mutations

Patients

Ia

Ib

II

III

IV

V

VI

Total

Age at radiographic examination

8.5

7.5

8.0

6.0

16.5

6.5

7.0

 

Tooth agenesis in primary dentition

3

0

2

2

0

0

0

7

Tooth agenesis in permanent dentition

28

23

26

16

15

19

22

149

Tapered maxillary central incisors

-

2

2

2

1

0

2

9

Molars available for analysis of taurodontisma

75

75

75

-

36

75

75

 

85

85

85

85

46

85

85

13

Molars with taurodontisma

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

11

Hyperhidrosis of palms and soles

+

+

-

+

-

+

+

5

Coarse hair structure and/or light/scarce/brittle hair

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

7

Nail abnormalities

-

-

-

-

+

-

+

2

Dry skin

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

6

No. of affected ectodermal appendages

3

3

2

3

2

3

4

mean 2.9

aAll were primary molars except for individual IV who had resorbed primary second molars and erupted permanent first molars

Additional ectodermal abnormalities

Ectodermal symptoms other than tooth agenesis were in some cases unnoticed, neglected or considered normal variants by the patient/parents. Upon interview, six individuals reported to have dry skin, and the number of affected ectodermal appendages in each patient varied from 2 to 4 (mean 2.9, median 3) (Table 1). Hyperhidrosis of palms/soles was reported from five patients, with most severe symptoms in individual Ia who also showed palmo-plantar hyperkeratosis. All seven patients reported on hair abnormalities including coarse, brittle and scarce hair. Slow-growing hair was reported in individuals Ia and II with agenesis of all or almost all permanent teeth, respectively. Abnormal nail phenotype was reported in two individuals: Individual IV who had absent nails at birth and individual VI who had mild hyponychia and brittle nails. None of the patients could be classified as a specific ED entity [22].

Unexpectedly, 6 patients shared a facial feature of a thin upper lip seen in all but individual Ib (Fig. 1.). Furthermore, individual IV had a dished-in facial profile as reported previously in association with WNT10A-associated tooth agenesis [14]. No patient reported any systemic conditions.

Genotyping

Genetic analysis of exons and their flanking sequences of WNT10A was performed as described previously [11], and the results revealed bi-allelic mutations in all seven individuals. All parents were found to be heterozygous. Altogether, three different mutated alleles were identified resulting in p.C107X, p.F228I and p.E222X (Fig. 1). These three WNT10A variants have been reported earlier [4, 9].

Discussion

We investigated seven individuals with severe oligodontia for their primary dentition, presence of ectodermal symptoms and WNT10A mutations. The selection of patients was based on severe oligodontia of permanent dentition and suspected but yet unspecified ED. Following assessment of primary dentition and presence of other ectodermal symptoms, the patients were analyzed for WNT10A gene variants. Bi-allelic mutations were confirmed in all seven individuals. In total, three different WNT10A alleles were detected that predict the previously described variants C107X, E222X and F228I. Clinical investigations at age 6–14 years revealed that the most distinctive initial sign in all examined individuals was the presence of numerous primary teeth in areas without succedaneous teeth. In total, seven primary incisors were missing from agenesis in three out of seven individuals, 5% of all primary teeth, compared to 76% of permanent teeth (mean 21.3). Notably, all three females but none of the males had primary tooth agenesis. This observed gender difference for absent primary teeth is significant (p = 0.02) but needs to be confirmed in larger and randomized cohorts. The most stable teeth were the maxillary central incisors, which were missing in only one individual. Severe dental abnormalities were found in individual Ia, who was missing three primary teeth and all permanent teeth, as well as individual II, missing two primary teeth and 26 permanent teeth, all but the maxillary central incisors.

Notably, all well-preserved primary incisors examined were peg teeth. Similarly, the permanent maxillary central incisors were severely tapered in 75% that were present. Taurodontism of primary or permanent molars was found in all of the examined individuals using biometric analysis from panoramic radiographs. This method is superior and more sensitive than cursory examination, especially in cases of milder forms of taurodontism [23]. The most evident signs were found in the single individual in whom permanent molars were assessed. In mandibular molars from either the primary or permanent dentitions present in each individual 84.6% were taurodontic. However, taurodontism is frequently found in individuals with hypodontia [21], with or without ED.

Besides tooth agenesis and misshaped teeth, all patients presented with an overlapping spectrum of mostly mild or previously unnoticed ectodermal symptoms including hyperhidrosis of palms and soles, aberrant hair texture, dry skin and nail dystrophy. None of the patients presented with the typical phenotype of EDA- or EDAR-induced hypohidrotic ED [24, 25] and the ectodermal signs and symptoms were incongruous with any defined ED-entity. The spectrum of ectodermal symptoms among our seven patients is consistent with that previously reported in patients with bi-allelic WNT10A mutations [36, 8, 10], and even in some patients with mono-allelic mutations [4, 6, 8, 11, 12]. Notably, with the exception of tooth agenesis, the signs and symptoms from ectodermal appendages in a majority of individuals in our cohort were subtle and in several cases even not experienced as abnormal by the study persons or their parents. Furthermore, we confirmed that carriers for bi-allelic WNT10A mutations have more primary teeth in positions where permanent teeth are missing [4]. Thus, in children with severe tooth agenesis it is important to consider mild or neglected symptoms from other ectodermal appendages. The molecular basis for the broad range of clinical expression due to WNT10A deficiency, from completely asymptomatic carriers to severely disabling ED entities, is yet unclear [10]. Interestingly, a thin upper lip was observed in all but one individual in our study. We observed a similar feature in photographs in three out of five patients from the study by Bohring et al., 2009 [4] Supplemental data]. This sign is distinct from the typical facial phenotype of EDA- and EDAR-induced ED and further studies are now needed to confirm this observation in carriers of WNT10A mutations.

Besides the critical role in the development of ectodermal lineages, increased expression of WNT10A has previously been implicated in a variety of cancers by up-regulation of the β-catenin pathway [1, 26]. In contrast, the structural WNT10A mutations known to be associated with abnormal development of ectodermal tissues are predicted to disrupt or reduce WNT mediated signaling [27]. Taken together, this is consistent with the fact that patients with structural WNT10A mutations are not reported to have increased risk for cancer.

Our study shows that bi-allelic WNT10A mutations are associated with a full or nearly full set of primary teeth with typical peg-shaped crowns of the mandibular incisors, persisting primary teeth in areas with missing permanent successors, and extensive tooth agenesis (oligodontia) in the permanent dentition, often with severely tapered maxillary central incisors. This is consistent with and adds to the dental features described by Bohring et al., 2009 [4], Supplemental data]. Furthermore, in combination with mild abnormalities in other ectodermal appendages, this typical dental pattern strongly suggests a WNT10A-associated ED that differs from what is seen in EDA- and EDAR-induced hypohidrotic ED.

Conclusions

We conclude that overt abnormalities in both primary and permanent dentitions together with other ectodermal symptoms can serve as predictors for WNT10A deficiency. Thus, individuals with bi-allelic WNT10A mutations may be recognized early in life by combining information of both dentitions as well as other ectodermal features of importance for diagnosis, prognosis and counselling.

Abbreviations

CB:R: 

Crown-body:root length

ED: 

Ectodermal dysplasia

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

UCSC: 

University of California Santa Cruz

UTR: 

Untranslated region

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families for participating in this research. We are also indebted to Marie Danell and Eine Ståhl, specialists in dentomaxillofacial radiology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden, for valuable assistance in assessment of taurodontism.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (grant 2015–02424 to N.D.), the Thuréus foundation for oral and dental research and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting our findings are included in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

BB and JN performed the clinical data collection and assessment of taurodontismXZ performed the genetic analyses. All authors participated in writing, design and interpretation of this report. BB wrote the initial draft of the manuscript which was edited for important intellectual content by JK and ND. All authors have given final approval of this version and all authors are accountable for the accuracy and integrity of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Oral and written consent for publication has been obtained from all study subjects or their parents.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out under ethical approval from the Ethics committee, Linköping University, Sweden, approval number Dnr 02–312. Oral informed consent to participate has been obtained from all study subjects or their parents.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Oral Disability Centre for Rare Disorders, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education
(2)
School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University
(3)
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University
(4)
Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University

References

  1. Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: evolving with the same signals. Development. 2012;139:3487–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Adaimy L, Chouery E, Megarbane H, Mroueh S, Delague V, Nicolas E, Belguith H, de Mazancourt P, Megarbane A. Mutation in WNT10A is associated with an autosomal recessive ectodermal dysplasia: the odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:821–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohring A, Stamm T, Spaich C, Haase C, Spree K, Hehr U, Hoffmann M, Ledig S, Sel S, Wieacker P, et al. WNT10A mutations are a frequent cause of a broad spectrum of ectodermal dysplasias with sex-biased manifestation pattern in heterozygotes. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:97–105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Nawaz S, Klar J, Wajid M, Aslam M, Tariq M, Schuster J, Baig SM, Dahl N. WNT10A missense mutation associated with a complete odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1600–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cluzeau C, Hadj-Rabia S, Jambou M, Mansour S, Guigue P, Masmoudi S, Bal E, Chassaing N, Vincent MC, Viot G, et al. Only four genes (EDA1, EDAR, EDARADD, and WNT10A) account for 90% of hypohidrotic/anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cases. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:70–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kantaputra P, Kaewgahya M, Jotikasthira D, Kantaputra W. Tricho-odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia and WNT10A mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:1041–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Van den Boogaard MJ, Creton M, Bronkhorst Y, Van der Hout A, Hennekam E, Lindhout D, Cune M, van Amstel HK P. Mutations in WNT10A are present in more than half of isolated hypodontia cases. J Med Genet. 2012;49:327–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arte S, Parmanen S, Pirinen S, Alaluusua S, Nieminen P. Candidate gene analysis of tooth agenesis identifies novel mutations in six genes and suggests significant role for WNT and EDA signaling and allele combinations. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73705.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Plaisancie J, Bailleul-Forestier I, Gaston V, Vaysse F, Lacombe D, Holder-Espinasse M, Abramowicz M, Coubes C, Plessis G, Faivre L, et al. Mutations in WNT10A are frequently involved in oligodontia associated with minor signs of ectodermal dysplasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161:671–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Arzoo PS, Klar J, Bergendal B, Norderyd J, Dahl N. WNT10A mutations account for (1/4) of population-based isolated oligodontia and show phenotypic correlations. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:353–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mues G, Bonds J, Xiang L, Vieira AR, Seymen F, Klein O, D’Souza RN. The WNT10A gene in ectodermal dysplasias and selective tooth agenesis. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:2455–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tziotzios C, Petrof G, Liu L, Verma A, Wedgeworth EK, Mellerio JE, McGrath JA. Clinical features and WNT10A mutations in seven unrelated cases of Schopf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:1211–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vink CP, Ockeloen CW. ten Kate S, Koolen DA, Ploos van Amstel JK, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van Heumen CC, Kleefstra T, Carels CE. Variability in dentofacial phenotypes in four families with WNT10A mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:1063–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Massink MP, Creton MA, Spanevello F, Fennis WM, Cune MS, Savelberg SM, Nijman IJ, Maurice MM, van den Boogaard MJ, van Haaften G. Loss-of-Function Mutations in the WNT Co-receptor LRP6 Cause Autosomal-Dominant Oligodontia. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:621–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimura R, Watanabe C, Kawaguchi A, Kim YI, Park SB, Maki K, Ishida H, Yamaguchi T. Common polymorphisms in WNT10A affect tooth morphology as well as hair shape. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:2673–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang J, Wang SK, Choi M, Reid BM, Hu Y, Lee YL, Herzog CR, Kim-Berman H, Lee M, Benke PJ, et al. Taurodontism, variations in tooth number, and misshapened crowns in Wnt10a null mice and human kindreds. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015;3:40–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Terezhalmy GT, Riley CK, Moore WS. Clinical images in oral medicine and maxillofacial radiology. Taurodontism. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:254–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lexner MO, Bardow A, Hertz JM, Nielsen LA, Kreiborg S. Anomalies of tooth formation in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17:10–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Seow WK, Lai PY. Association of taurodontism with hypodontia: a controlled study. Pediatr Dent. 1989;11:214–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kan WY, Seow WK, Holcombe T. Taurodontism in children with hypodontia and supernumerary teeth: a case control study. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:134–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Visinoni AF, Lisboa-Costa T, Pagnan NA, Chautard-Freire-Maia EA. Ectodermal dysplasias: clinical and molecular review. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:1980–2002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hegde V, Anegundi RT, Pravinchandra KR. Biometric Analysis - A Reliable Indicator for Diagnosing Taurodontism using Panoramic Radiographs. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1779–81.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bergendal B. Orodental manifestations in ectodermal dysplasia-a review. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:2465–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kieri CF, Bergendal B, Lind LK, Schmitt-Egenolf M, Stecksen-Blicks C. EDAR-induced hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: a clinical study on signs and symptoms in individuals with a heterozygous c.1072C > T mutation. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Long A, Giroux V, Whelan KA, Hamilton KE, Tetreault MP, Tanaka K, Lee JS, Klein-Szanto AJ, Nakagawa H, Rustgi AK. WNT10A promotes an invasive and self-renewing phenotype in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36:598–606.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu F, Millar SE. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in oral tissue development and disease. J Dent Res. 2010;89:318–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement