Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effect of Pregnane X Receptor*1B genetic polymorphisms on postoperative analgesia with fentanyl in Chinese patients undergoing gynecological surgery

  • Jing-Jing Yuan1,
  • Xiao-Jing Ma1,
  • Zhi-Song Li1,
  • Yan-Zi Chang1,
  • Wei Zhang1Email author,
  • Quan-Cheng Kan2, 3,
  • Jun-Kai Hou1 and
  • Li-Rong Zhang4
BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-016-0348-5

Received: 11 December 2015

Accepted: 15 November 2016

Published: 23 November 2016

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of the pregnane X receptor (PXR)*1B polymorphisms on CYP3A4 enzyme activity and postoperative fentanyl consumption in Chinese patients undergoing gynecological surgery.

Methods

A total of 287 females of Han ethnicity, aged 20 to 50 years old, ASA I or II, scheduled to abdominal total hysterectomy or myomectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled. The analgesic model used was fentanyl consumption via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in the post-operative period. Additionally, pain was assessed using a visual analog score (VAS). Pain scores, occurrence of adverse reactions and consumption of fentanyl were recorded during the 24 h postoperative period. The enzyme activity of CYP3A4 was evaluated by measuring the plasma ratio of 1′-hydroxymidazolam to midazolam 1 h after intravenous administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam. PXR genotyping was performed by direct DNA sequencing and the PXR * 1B haplotype was analyzed via PHASE V.2.1 software.

Results

The polymorphism frequency of PXR11156A > C/11193 T > C and 8055C > T were 49.6 and 49.3%, and the rate of PXR * 1B haplotype was 48.8% in our study. None of the pain scores, consumption of fentanyl 24 h post-operatively or enzyme activity of CYP3A4, showed differences among different genotypes.

Conclusions

PXR11156A > C, PXR11193T > C, PXR8055C > T or the PXR * 1B haplotype do not appear to be important factors contributing to CYP3A4 activity and interindividual variations in postoperative fentanyl consumption in Han female patients undergoing gynecological surgery.

Trial registration

The DNA samples were obtained since 2007 to 2010 year in our hospital, there was no registration at that time. So this section is not applicable to our research.

Keywords

FentanylCYP3A4Pregnane X receptorPolymorphismAnalgesia

Background

Fentanyl, an intravenous μ-opioid receptor agonist, is widely used for postoperative analgesia. However, the analgesic effect of fentanyl demonstrates significant inter-individual variation [1]. These variations in response can lead to inadequate pain relief and may affect the incidence of adverse events such as respiratory depression and muscle stiffness [2, 3]. Dolin et al. [4] reported that approximately 30–40% of patients using postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) reported moderate to severe pain and 10% reported severe pain.

Part of the variable response to pain medications may be attributed to genetic factors [5].

Fentanyl is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4, (CYP3A4) [68], which is the most abundant metabolic enzyme in liver. The level of expression and activity of CYP3A4 showed a 10–100-fold inter-individual difference [911]. Prior studies have indicated that genetic factors could significantly affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs by altering the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes or their activities [12, 13].

PXR is a nuclear receptor that serves a primary role in the up-regulation of proteins and enzymes in response to endogenous and exogenous substances and it was found to be a key regulator of CYP3A4 [11, 12]. Polymorphic variations of the PXR gene, such as the haplotype of PXR * 1B has been confirmed to contribute to both of the mRNA level and the protein content of CYP3A4 [13, 14]. The PXR * 1B haplotype is composed of PXR 11193 T > C and PXR 8055C > T, PXR 11156A > C is in complete linkage with PXR 11193 T > C and is similar to it [14, 15]. PXR*1B has three haplotypes: non-PXR * 1B haplotype (wild homozygotes of the three genes), PXR * 1B haplotype (heterozygotes of the three genes) and PXR * 1B/ * 1B (mutant homozygotes of the three genes). However, it is still elusive if PXR * 1B haplotype has sufficient effect on the catalytic activity of the CYP3A4 enzyme, and subsequently alter the analgesic effect of fentanyl for postoperative pain control.

Methods

Some of methods were referred to the study done by W Zhang et al. [6] as the following:

Subjects

A total of 287 females, of self-reported Han ethnicity, aged20 to 50 years old, with a physical status of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II and scheduled for abdominal total hysterectomy or myomectomy under general anesthesia were screened at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. All subjects and genetic material obtained during the period of 2007 and 2010 were a subset of a larger group of 330 patients collected for medical studies. All samples that had relative full information and a usable blood sample were included in this study. The study protocol was previously approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University and every patient provided signed informed consent. Participants with a history of psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hepatic and renal dysfunction, alcohol or drug abuse, diabetes or chronic analgesic use were excluded. Patients were also questioned about diet and medication intake 2 weeks prior to their surgery and were excluded if they reported consuming any drugs or food that are known to inhibit the expression level or activity of the CYP3A4 enzyme (clarithromycin, erythromycin, grapefruit juice etc.) [6]. All patients were operated on by the same group of 4 surgeons.

Anesthetic procedure

Patients were not given any premedication and standard monitors were used. During the induction of anesthesia, midazolam (0.1 mg/kg), propofol (0.5 mg/kg) and remifentanil (2 μg/kg) were utilized. Succinylcholine (1 mg/kg) provided muscle relaxation for intubation. During the surgical procedure, propofol 100–150 mcg/kg/min and remifentanil 0.1–0.2 μg/kg/min were continuously infused. To maintain adequate muscle relaxation, an initial dose of atracurium (0.6 mg/kg) was given immediately after tracheal intubation, and intermittent doses (0.1–0.2 mg/kg) were utilized during the case. All patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated with a target end-tidal CO2 of 35–40 mmHg. Fentanyl (1 μg/kg), as a loading dose, was infused intravenously approximately 30 min prior to the completion of surgery. All anesthetics were stopped at the end of surgery. Atropine (0.5 mg) and neostigmine (1 mg) were used to reverse muscle relaxation in all patients. Patients were extubated after adequate recovery as was judged by the anesthesiologist.

Assessment of postoperative analgesia

After extubation, all patients were assessed in the operating room using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain). Fentanyl 20 μg was given to patients whose VAS was over 3 and was redosed every 5 minutes until the VAS score was less than 3; at which time a PCA with fentanyl was immediately begun. The dose of fentanyl, VAS score, the occurrence of adverse reactions after surgery and 24 h after surgery were recorded.

The PCA pump contained a total of fentanyl 1.0 mg, droperidol 5 mg and saline to reach a total volume of 100 ml, with a final concentration of 10 μg/ml of fentanyl. The pump was set with a background rate of 0.5 ml per hour (a background infusion of 5 μg fentanyl/h). Doses were set at 2 ml, with a lockout time of 5 min, allowing a maximum dose of 145 μg per hour. If the VAS score remained above 3, with a maximum dose of fentanyl, other analgesics would be given and the patient was be excluded from the trial.

Genotyping for PXR polymorphisms

Peripheral venous blood samples (2 ml) were obtained from all patients enrolled. Genomic DNA was extracted using a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure. Genotyping of PXR11156A > C, PXR11193T > C and 8055C > T was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing. The PXR * 1B haplotype was genotyped by PHASE V.2.1 software. The results, including agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing, are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Fig. 1

The electrophoregram of PXR11156A > C and PXR11193T > C. Peripheral venous blood samples were taken from all patients. Genomic DNA was extracted using a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure. Genotyping of PXR11156A > C, PXR11193T > C allele was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), following with direct sequencing. PXR*1B haplotype was genotyped by PHASE V.2.1 software. Figure 1 showed the 258 bp band of the PCR amplification product which contained PXR11193T > C. The DM500 marker, which contains the bands of 50 bp, 100 bp, 150 bp, 200 bp, 300 bp, 400 bp and 500 bp was used

Fig. 2

The DNA sequence of PXR11193T > C. Genomic DNA was extracted using a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure. Genotyping of PXR11193T > C allele was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), direct sequencing. PXR*1B haplotype was genotyped by PHASE V.2.1 software. Two T bases were showed in the PXR11193T > C wild homozygotes. One T base and one C base were showed in the PXR11193T > C heterozygotes. Two C bases were showed in the mutant homozygotes

Fig. 3

The electrophoresis of PXR8055C > T. Genomic DNA was extracted using a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure. Genotyping of PXR8055C > T allele was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), following with direct sequencing. PXR*1B haplotype was genotyped by PHASE V.2.1 software. Figure 3 showed the 216 bp band of the PCR amplification product which contained PXR8055C > T. The DM500 marker, which contains the bands of 50 bp, 100 bp, 150 bp, 200 bp, 300 bp, 400 bp and 500 bp was used

Fig. 4

The DNA sequence of PXR8055C > T. Genomic DNA was extracted using a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure. Genotyping of PXR8055C > T allele was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), direct sequencing. PXR*1B haplotype was genotyped by PHASE V.2.1 software. Two C bases were showed in the PXR8055C > T wild homozygotes. One T base and one T base were showed in the PXR8055C > T heterozygotes. Two T bases were showed in the mutant homozygotes

Genotyping of the PXR11156A > C and PXR11193T > C polymorphisms was previously described by Wang XD et al. [15]. Genotyping of the PXR8055C > T polymorphism was identified by the following process, a 216-bp fragment, including the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 8055C > T, was created. The forward and reverse primers used for amplification were PXR8055C > T (forward: 5′-GGCAGGAAGATGGAATGG-3′ and reverse: 5′-GGGAGAAGAGGGAGATGG-3′). The 50 μl reaction mixture included 25 μl of 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 1 μl of each of primers, 0.5 μl of cDNA template, and 22.5 μl of deionized water (diH2O). The amplification of PXR8055C > T was performed by the following process: 3-min initial denaturation at 94 °C, denaturation at 94 °C for 30s, anneal at 57 °C for 30s, elongation at 72 °C for 30s, followed by 30 cycles, then extended at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification products were kept at 4 °C and identified by the agarose gel electrophoresis. Genotyping of SNPs was performed by direct sequencing. For each polymorphism of PXR (PXR11156A > C, PXR11193T > C and 8055 C > T), patients were assigned to three groups according to the genotypes: wild homozygotes, heterozygotes group and mutant homozygotes. Patients were also divided into three haplotypes analyzed by PHASE V.2.1 software: non-PXR * 1B haplotype, PXR * 1B haplotype and PXR * 1B/ * 1B haplotype as described in the background (Table 1).
Table 1

Composition of PXR polymorphisms and PXR * 1B haplotypes

 

Non-PXR * 1B (n = 73)

PXR * 1B (n = 140)

PXR * 1B/ * 1B (n = 70)

1156 A > C

AA (73)

AC (140)

CC (75)

11193 T > C

TT (75)

TC (141)

CC (71)

8055 C > T

CC (74)

CT (144)

TT (70)

Data are expressed as numbers

Evaluation of CYP3A4 activity

The CYP3A4 activity was determined by the plasma ratio of 1′-hydroxymidazolam (1′-MDZ) to midazolam (MDZ), at 1 h after the intravenous injection of midazolam 0.1 mg/kg for induction. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) was used to measure the level of 1′- MDZ and MDZ as described by Kanazawa et al. [16].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Values were reported as \( mean\pm SD \). The Chi-square test was used to verify Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Data for the fentanyl consumption were compared using one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Between-group comparisons of the VAS score were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Multiple comparisons were performed before and after being adjusted for age, weight and the intraoperative remifentanyl dosing. The incidences of adverse effects were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Power analysis of the post-operative fentanyl consumption was performed with the NCSS PASS 2008 (NCSS Inc., Kaysville, Utah, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was set to indicate statistical significance.

Results

All 287 women who were taken from the larger cohort were included in the final pain analysis final. The frequency of the PXR11193T > C allele was 49.6%; the frequency of PXR8055C > T allele was 49.3%; the frequency of PXR * 1B haplotype was 48.8%. Allele frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05).

Although patients received an intravenous infusion of fentanyl (1 μg/kg) approximately 30 min prior to the completion surgery, the VAS pain score at the end of surgery was a mean of 6.1 ± 1.2. The pain score At 24 h after surgery was 2.2 ± 0.7 on average. No patient required rescue management for inadequate pain control. The mean fentanyl consumption was 452 μg ± 86 μg in the 24 h period after surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 20.8%. The incidence of mild sedation and dizziness in our study was 6.9 and 5.6%, respectively.

There was no difference in demographics, VAS pain scores at the end of surgery or at 24 h postoperatively between groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in PCA fentanyl consumption for the 24 h period after surgery between groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, the enzyme activity of CYP3A4 showed no significant variation relative to genotype (Tables 2 and 3). There were no statistical differences in the incidence of the side effects between PXR haplotypes (P > 0.05)
Table 2

General information for PXR * 1B haplotypes

 

Non-PXR * 1B

PXR * 1B

PXR * 1B/ * 1B

P value

Age (years)

41 ± 5

40 ± 6

42 ± 4

0.100

BMI (kg/m2)

21.8 ± 2.0

22.1 ± 2.1

23.0 ± 2.3

0.666

Total hysterectomy

50

92

39

0.832

Myomectomy

22

48

21

0.224

Operation time (min)

90 ± 14

88 ± 17

95 ± 11

0.804

Propofol (mg)

560 ± 89

550 ± 90

570 ± 91

0.770

Remifentanil (μg)

921 ± 130

914 ± 106

945 ± 137

0.449

Data are expressed as numbers or mean ± SD. Drug doses are totals

Table 3

Effect of PXR * 1B haplotypes on postoperative analgesia

 

Non-PXR * 1B

PXR * 1B

PXR * 1B/ * 1B

P value

Initial postoperative VAS scores

6.1 ± 1.3

6.2 ± 1.1

5.9 ± 1.0

0.414

Mean VAS scores during first 24 h

2.1 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

0.601

Fentanyl consumption during first 24 h (μg)

468 ± 83

453 ± 85

435 ± 87

0.062

bCYP3A activity (1′-OHMDZ:MDZ)

0.40 ± 0.12

0.39 ± 0.14

0.40 ± 0.11

0.885

Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. P values are adjusted by age, sex, weight, remifentanyl dose during the operation, and type of surgery. bCYP3A4 activity (n = 95)

Discussion

PXR is a key transcription activating factor for the expression of the CYP3A4 gene [13, 14]. A model of transgenic mice, produced in 2000, demonstrated that PXR plays an important role in the expression of CYP3A4 [13]. The PXR * 1B haplotype (PXR1156A > C, PXR11193T > C and PXR8055C > T) has been shown previously to effect the metabolic parameters of doxorubicin in patients with breast cancer [17]. Gender has been reported to influence the enzyme activity of CYP3A4 [18], however, since this study was limited to gynecology patients, gender variation was not an issue.

Midazolam was used as a probe drug for the CYP3A4 enzyme and is metabolized to 1′-OH midazolam by CYP3A4 enzyme. The metabolic breakdown of midazolam is primarily influenced by the activity of CYP3A4, not blood flow to the liver [19]. However, we found no significant differences in metabolism based on genotype.

We noted that occurrence rate of PXR * 1B was 48.8% and appeared to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Our study demonstrated that the PXR * 1B haplotype did not influence the analgesic effects of fentanyl postoperatively and therefore does not appear to be a main determining factor for variations in fentanyl use.

In Asian patients with breast cancer, PXR * 1B haplotype affected the PXR mRNA level. Patients with the PXR*1B haplotype showed a lower PXR mRNA level compared with the patients with non- PXR*1B haplotype. PXR*1B-bearing liver tissues were associated with significantly lower expression of CYP3A4 compared with non- PXR*1B-bearing liver tissues. Furthermore, PXR * 1B haplotype had an reducing-effect on the elimination rate of doxorubicin [19, 20]. In the present research, difference of the fentanyl consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively among the PXR * 1B haplotypes was not found. However, a decreasing trend of the fentanyl consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively among the PXR * 1B haplotypes was found. That was, fentanyl consumption was much lower in the patients containing PXR * 1B haplotype. It might due to the limitation of our research sample size, statistical significance could not be obtained. Since it is impractical to obtaine liver samples from the subjects. The CYP3A4 protein levels were not be able to be detected, either. On the other hand, doxorubicin and fentanyl are also substrates of P-glycoprotein encoded by ABCB1 gene. Since P-glycoprotein is also affected by the nuclear receptor-PXR at transcriptional level [21], we speculate that the genetic variations of the PXR * 1B haplotype have a more significant effect on ABCB1 than CYP3A4.

The study only evaluated the effects of the PXR * 1B haplotype on the analgesic effect of fentanyl. The determination of the fentanyl metabolism in vivo may be impacted by not only the protein expression, but also the CYP3A4 activity, and other factors such as CYP3A5 enzyme and other drug interactions etc. Due to study limitations we were unable to actually determine the level of CYP3A4 protein expression in the hepatocytes of subjects. In the future a study that extracts microsomes from hepatic cells and assesses the protein expression and the activity of CYP3A4 enzyme in vitro may avoid any confounding factors.

There was a limitation to our research. 330 samples were collected during 2007 and 2010. Although we almost genotyped the entire DNA samples, not every sample had the whole data we need in this research. Especially for the CYP3A enzyme activity, we only got 95 samples’ data. The statistical power for the fentanyl consumption was 0.736 and it was low for the CYP3A enzyme activity.

Conclusions

In summary, we investigated the effects of the polymorphisms of PXR * 1B on intravenous postoperative analgesia with fentanyl in patients undergoing selective abdominal total hysterectomy or myomectomy under general anesthesia. Our results failed to found significant effects contributed by the polymorphisms of PXR * 1B.

Abbreviations

1′-MDZ: 

1′-hydroxymidazolam

ASA: 

American Society of Anesthesiologists

CYP450: 

Cytochrome P450

LC/MS: 

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

MDZ: 

Midazolam

mRNA: 

Messager RNA

PCA: 

Patient-controlled analgesia

PCIA: 

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PXR

Pregnane X Receptor

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

VAS: 

Visual analog score

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the professor Keith A. Candiotti’s and Shaogen Wu’s work on the revision of this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by grant from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NO.81171060, 81173127 and 81273581).

Role of the sponsors: The funding agency had no role in the study design, or the data collection, analysis, or interpretation, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JJ Yuan and XJ Ma Contributed equally to this work. W Zhang, QC Kan conceived the project and supervised most experiments. W Zhang and LR Zhang designed the project. JJ Yuan did the clinical anesthesia and collected the clinical data. YZ Chang extracted the DNA and ZS Li did the CYP3A4 enzyme activity test. XJ Ma did the genotyping for PXR and arranged the data. JJ Yuan, XJ Ma and JK Hou analyzed the data. JJ Yuan, XJ Ma wrote the manuscript. All of the authors read and discussed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was previously approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University and every patient provided signed informed consent.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
(2)
Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics
(3)
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
(4)
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Zhengzhou University

References

  1. Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, Cousins MJ, Armstrong PJ. Fentanyl blood concentration-analgesic response relationship in the treatment of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(4):329–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cartwright P, Prys-Roberts C, Gill K, Dye A, Stafford M. Ventilatory depression related to plasma fentanyl concentrations during and after anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg. 1983;62(11):966–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lemmen RJ, Semmekrot BA. Muscle rigidity causing life-threatening hypercapnia following fentanyl administration in a premature infant. Eur J Pediatr. 1996;155(12):1067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(3):409–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Landau R, Kern C, Columb MO, Smiley RM, Blouin JL. Genetic variability of the mu-opioid receptor influences intrathecal fentanyl analgesia requirements in laboring women. Pain. 2008;139(1):5–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang W, Chang YZ, Kan QC, Zhang LR, Li ZS, Lu H, et al. CYP3A4*1G genetic polymorphism influences CYP3A activity and response to fentanyl in Chinese gynecologic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(1):61–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tateishi T, Krivoruk Y, Ueng YF, Wood AJ, Guengerich FP, Wood M. Identification of human liver cytochrome P-450 3A4 as the enzyme responsible for fentanyl and sufentanil N-dealkylation. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(1):167–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Labroo RB, Paine MF, Thurmnel KE, Kharasch ED. Fentanyl metabolism by human hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4: implications for interindividual variability in disposition, efficacy, and drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 1997;25(9):1072–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Westlind-Johnsson A, Malmebo S, Johansson A, Otter C, Andersson TB, Johansson I, et al. Comparative analysis of CYP3A expression in human liver suggests only a minor role for CYP3A5 in drug metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(6):755–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(10):1271–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xie W, Barwick JL, Downes M, Blumberg B, Simon CM, Nelson MC, et al. Humanized xenobiotic response in mice expressing nuclear receptor SXR. Nature. 2000;406(6794):435–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smutny T, Mani S, Pavek P. Post-translational and post-transcriptional modifications of pregnane X receptor (PXR) in regulation of the cytochrome P450 superfamily. Curr Drug Metab. 2013;14(10):1059–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang J, Kuehl P, Green ED, Touchman JW, Watkins PB, Daly A, et al. The human pregnane X receptor: genomic structure and identification and functional characterization of natural allelic variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11(7):555–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. He P, Court MH, Greenblatt DJ, von Moltke LL. Human pregnane X receptor: genetic polymorphisms, alternative mRNA splice variants, and cytochrome P450 3A metabolic activity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46(11):1356–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang XD, Deng XY, Chen J, Li JL, Chen X, Zhao LZ, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the pregnane X receptor gene in Han Chinese and a comparision with other ethnic populations. Pharmacology. 2008;81(4):350–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanazawa H, Okada A, Igarashi E, Higaki M, Miyabe T, Sano T, et al. Determination of midazolam and its metabolite as a probe for cytochrome P450 3A4 phenotype by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1031(1–2):213–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandanaraj E, Lal S, Selvarajan V, Ooi LL, Wong ZW, Wong NS, et al. PXR pharmacogenetics: association of haplotypes with hepatic CYP3A4 and ABCB1 messenger RNA expression and doxorubicin clearance in Asian breast cancer patiens. Clin Cancer. 2008;14(21):7116–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J, Wan Y, Na S, Liu X, Dong G, Yang Z, et al. Sex-dependent regulation of hepatic CYP3A by growth hormone: roles of HNF6, C/EBPα, and RXRα. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;93(1):92–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lown KS, Kolars JC, Thummel KE, Barnett JL, Kunze KL, Wrighton SA, et al. Interpatient heterogeneity in expression breath test. Drug Metab Dispos. 1994;22(6):947–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lal S, Mahajan A, Chen WN, Chowbay B. Pharmacogenetics of target genes across doxorubicin disposition pathway: a review. Curr Drug Metab. 2010;11(1):115–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mottino AD, Catania VA. Hepatic drug transporters and nuclear receptors: regulation by therapeutic agents. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(46):7068–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement