Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Insertion of an extra copy of Xq22.2 into 1p36 results in functional duplication of the PLP1 gene in a girl with classical Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease

  • Julien Masliah-Planchon1, 2, 3,
  • Céline Dupont4,
  • George Vartzelis5,
  • Aurélien Trimouille1, 2,
  • Eléonore Eymard-Pierre6, 7,
  • Mathilde Gay-Bellile6, 7,
  • Florence Renaldo2, 8,
  • Imen Dorboz2,
  • Cécile Pagan1,
  • Samuel Quentin9,
  • Monique Elmaleh10,
  • Christina Kotsogianni5,
  • Elissavet Konstantelou5,
  • Séverine Drunat1, 2,
  • Anne-Claude Tabet4 and
  • Odile Boespflug-Tanguy2, 8Email author
BMC Medical Genetics201516:77

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-015-0226-6

Received: 10 February 2015

Accepted: 25 August 2015

Published: 2 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD) is an X-linked dysmyelinating disorder characterized by nystagmus, hypotonia, ataxia, progressive spasticity, and cognitive decline. PMD classically results from a duplication of a genomic segment encompassing the entire PLP1 gene. Since the PLP1 gene is located in Xq22, PMD affects mostly boys.

Methods and results

Here we report the case of a girl with typical PMD. Copy number analysis of the PLP1 locus revealed a duplication of the entire gene and FISH analysis showed that the extra copy of the PLP1 gene was actually inserted in chromosome 1p36. This insertion of an additional copy of PLP1 in an autosome led to a functional duplication irrespective of the X-inactivation pattern. Subsequent overexpression of PLP1 was the cause of the PMD phenotype observed in this girl. Further sequencing of the breakpoint junction revealed a microhomology and thus suggested a replication based mechanism (such as FoSTeS or MMBIR).

Conclusion

This case emphasizes the susceptibility of the PLP1 locus to complex rearrangement likely driven by the Xq22 local genomic architecture. In addition, careful consideration should be given to girls with classical PMD clinical features since they usually experience complex PLP1 genomic alteration with a distinct risk of inheritance.

Background

Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD; MIM#312080) is a rare X-linked hypomyelinating leukodystrophy related to genomic alterations of the proteolipid protein 1 (PLP1) gene [1]. PLP1 encodes both major proteins of the central nervous system (CNS) myelin, PLP and DM20. PMD is characterized by early nystagmus, hypotonia and ataxia with subsequent signs of neurodegeneration characterized by severe spasticity and cognitive impairment. However, a large clinical spectrum exists from severe forms without motor acquisitions and dystonia (PMD0), to mild forms with acquired walking capacities (PMD3), and the mildest form of PLP-pathies, spastic paraplegia type 2 (SPG2, MIM#312920). An obvious genotype-phenotype correlation has been described in PMD. Missense mutations are rare but usually cause the most severe forms, whereas PLP1 loss-of-function alterations (null mutations and large deletions) lead to the mildest PMD/SPG2 forms. Classical PMD is commonly caused by duplication of a genomic segment containing the entire PLP1 gene. PLP1 gene duplication results in PLP overexpression and subsequent accumulation in the cytoplasm of the myelinating oligodendrocytes leading to cellular stress and CNS myelin defect. A gain of three to five copies of the PLP1 gene have been rarely described and are associated with a severe phenotype [2, 3]. PMD affects almost exclusively boys and most females who carry and transmit PLP1 genomic alterations to their affected sons are asymptomatic or manifest mild, late-onset spastic paraplegia or cognitive impairment. Few cases of girls presenting a phenotype of PMD in childhood have been described. Foncesca et al. reported the case of a constitutional translocation t(X;22)(q22;q13) with an additional PLP1 copy at the breakpoint region in a girl with classical PMD [4]. Yiu et al. reported another case of a PMD girl with an unbalanced chromosomal translocation of PLP1 into 1p36 [5]. Additional cases of girls with PMD due to very large PLP1 gene duplications have been reported [6].

Here we report the case of a 2 year old girl with typical PMD who has an insertion of an extra copy of a genomic segment of Xq22 containing the entire PLP1 gene into chromosome 1p36. This insertion of an additional active copy of PLP1 in an autosome led to a functional duplication. Further delineation of the breakpoint junction sequence revealed a microhomology and thus support a replication based mechanism such as FoSTeS and MMBIR. Our result further emphasizes the large diversity of the genomic rearrangement involving the PLP1 gene probably based on the complexity of the genomic architecture [7].

Methods

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)

MLPA was conducted according to the supplied manufacturer’s specifications using the probemix P022-PLP1 (MRC-holland, Amsterdam, Holland). PCR products were then mixed with formamide (HiDi Formamide, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and fluorescent Genescan 500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems) prior to analysis using an Applied Biosystems ABI 3130xl capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Data collection and export used GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). Peak areas of each fragment were compared to those of a control sample to calculate the gene dosage of each amplicon, including those corresponding to each exon of the PLP1 gene.

X chromosome inactivation pattern

The analysis of the X inactivation pattern was based on extend human androgen receptor (HUMARA) assay proposed Bertelsen et al. [8]. Briefly, 200 ng of leukocyte DNA was digested with HpaII (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) at 37 °C for 12 h. PCR amplification of four loci (AR, PCSK1N, SLITRK4, and ZDHHC15) was performed on undigested DNA and HpaII digested DNA. PCR products were subsequently analyzed on an ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). The X-inactivation ratios were calculated as previously described and skewed X chromosome inactivation was considered if this ratio decrease below 20 % in the investigated blood sample [8].

PLP1 gene expression analysis in patient fibroblasts

Total RNA was isolated from fibroblasts of eight controls without copy number variation of the PLP1 gene, of one positive control with a duplication of PLP1, and of our patient using the guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method. Ten microgram was used to generate cDNA using Superscript II first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with oligo (dT) primers, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Our patient and control cDNAs were used for PLP1 gene expression analysis performed by real-time PCR according to previously reported conditions [9]. Specifically designed primers were used to determined total PLP1 gene expression after normalization to the beta-glucuronidase gene (GUSB) expression using the ΔΔCt method.

Microarray

Creation of a custom array CGH design was performed using the Agilent software eArray (https://earray.chem.agilent.com/earray/), referred to the GRCh37/hg19 assembly to cover the PLP1 genomic region with maximum resolution. The microarray contained a total of 30,032 probes spanning a 20 Mb region surrounding the PLP1 gene (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Those 30,032 probes were distributed between three groups with various probe densities. The first group includes 15,032 probes encompassing 2 Mb (chrX: 102,000,000–104,000,000; corresponding to a 150 bp average probe spacing) around the PLP1 gene and includes most of the PLP1 duplications described so far [10, 11]. A second, largest interval contained 10,000 probes surrounding 8 Mb (chrX: 98,000,000–102,000,000 and chrX: 104,000,000–106,000,000; 800 bp average probe spacing). The last interval was designed to encompass the largest PLP1 rearrangement and includes 5,000 probes spanning 10 Mb (chrX: 93,000,000–98,000,000 and chrX: 106,000,000–113,000,000; 2000 bp average probe spacing) [6].

A HumanCytoSNP-12 (V2.1) pangenomic microarray (Illumina, San Diego, CA USA) was also performed.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on lymphocytes metaphase spreads according to standard protocols. FISH analysis was carried out with the probe RP11-832L2 spanning 183 Kb (chrX:102,902,650–103,085,315), which encompasses the entire PLP1 gene, together with a subtelomeric probe of the short arm of chromosome 1 (CEB108/T7).

Genome walker

The Universal Genome Walking Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to identify precise breakpoints of the inserted PLP1-containing X chromosome segment into 1p36. According to the manufacturer’s protocol, the genomic DNA of the patient was completely digested with four separate restriction enzymes (i.e. EcoRV, DraI, PvuII, and SspI) and subsequently ligated to the GenomeWalker adaptors. The GenomeWalker libraries produced were then used as a template for primary PCR amplification. The primers used were the outer adaptor primer provided in the kit and a Xq22 specific primer localized at the boundaries of the duplicated PLP1 segment identified with our highly resolutive PLP1-custom array CGH. A secondary nested PCR using the nested adaptor primer and a nested Xq22 specific primer was then performed. Sequencing of the PCR products was finally achieved if a single or two (considering that both, the normal Xq22 and the 1p36 derivative, alleles could be digested and ligated to the adaptor) specific and major PCR products were visible after electrophoresis through an agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA). Sequencing was conducted using the nested primers with the BigDye terminator sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).

Results

Case report

Here we report the case of a girl who is the third child from unrelated and healthy parents of Greek origin. Pregnancy was uneventful, however during the second month of life a horizontal nystagmus and severe hypotonia were noticed. At 9 months of age, a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed due to a persistent delay in motor milestones associated with ataxia of the head and trunk led; MRI revealed a severe delay in the myelination process (evaluated at 2 months of age). Afterwards, she improved obviously in motor capacities (holding her head up at 12 months, sitting with support at 16 months, and standing position at 30 months) with excellent psychosocial interactions and decreased nystagmus intensity. Another brain MRI at 33 months of age confirmed the diffuse “hypomyelinating” pattern of the supratentorial cerebral white matter (Fig. 1). In addition, brainstem auditory evoked potentials showed an exclusive cochlear wave I without subsequent recordable brain waves suggesting a severe impairment in CNS conduction. No other abnormalities including dysmorphic features, heart, kidney, or liver problems were found. Now aged 4 years, she continues to improve (crawling, walking with support, feeding herself, drawing a line, speaking using comprehensive simple sentences). However, signs of pyramidal tract dysfunctions are clearly present in the lower limbs and MRI abnormalities have not changed. Those clinical features strongly suggested the diagnosis of PMD.
Fig. 1

Patient’s brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sagittal T1-weighted MRI showed iso/hyposignal of the whole cerebral white matter, axial T2-weighted, and FLAIR images showing diffuse hypersignal of the hemispheric white matter, internal capsule, and corpus callosum in the patient at 2.5 years compared to an age-matched healthy child

Characterization of the PLP1 gene duplication

MLPA analysis of the DNA extracted from the patient’s blood revealed a duplication of the seven probes localized in each coding exon of the PLP1 gene. Additional probes that were duplicated revealed that the duplication extended at least from the TCEAL1 to ESX1 genes thus encompassing at least 614 Kb (but less than 1685 Kb).

To confirm the PLP1 duplication and define more precisely the size of the duplicated segment we used a custom array CGH (aCGH) designed to encompass the Xq22 genomic region containing the PLP1 gene with maximum resolution. The aCGH profile confirmed the MLPA result and specified the breakpoint of the duplicated genomic segment covering from 102,761,000 to 103,513,000 (752 Kb of length) on Xq22 according to the GRCh37/hg19 assembly (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Insertion of an Xq22 segment including PLP1 in 1p36. a Custom PLP1 array CGH profile confirms the PLP1 gene (centered on the blue bar) duplication and precise the breakpoint of the duplicated genomic segment expanding from 102,761,000 to 103,513,000 (752 Kb of length) on Xq22 (the red arrow indicates the embedded triplicated segment). b FISH analysis with the RP11-832L2 PLP1-specific and the CEB108/T7 1p36 subtelomeric probes reveals that the additional PLP1 copy is inserted into autosome 1p36. c Sequencing of a breakpoint of the insertion of PLP1-containing segment in 1p36 chromosome reveals a two-base pair microhomology

We next performed FISH analysis with a BAC probe specific to the PLP1 locus (RP11-832L2, Xq22.2) on lymphocyte metaphase spreads. Three distinct PLP1-specific signals were visualized consistent with the PLP1 duplication in a girl. Two probes bound to the normal Xq22 band of both X chromosomes together with an additional ectopic signal that bound just proximal to the CEB108/T7 1p36 subtelomeric probe (Fig. 2b). Another FISH analysis with BAC probes localized to X chromosome telomeres did not reveal a translocation involving the X chromosome. Hence, the additional copy of PLP1 results from an insertion into chromosome 1p36 rather than a classical translocation. A whole genome microarray confirmed the PLP1 duplication but did not reveal any copy number alteration in 1p36 region. MLPA analysis in the parents did not reveal any variation in PLP1 copy number. However, we wondered if this rearrangement was nevertheless inherited from a parental balanced rearrangement. Therefore we performed the PLP1 specific FISH analysis on the parents’ blood and did not detect any ectopic localization of the PLP1 gene. We thus conclude that this rearrangement was acquired either in the gametes of one of the parents or de novo.

Absence of skewed X inactivation pattern

A skewed X inactivation pattern resulting in inactivation of the X chromosome carrying the abnormal PLP1 gene has been suggested to explain why most females who carry PLP1 genomic alteration are asymptomatic [12]. We thus performed an analysis of the X inactivation pattern based on the extend HUMARA assay [8]. This analysis of DNA extracted from a blood sample from the patient did not reveal a significant skewed pattern for any of the four X chromosome loci explored (i.e. AR, PCSK1N, SLITRK4, and ZDHHC15). Although we cannot assert that there is not a skewed X chromosome inactivation pattern in the oligodendrocytes of the patient, the insertion of an extra-copy of PLP1 in an autosome did lead to a functional duplication irrespective of the X-inactivation pattern.

PLP1 over-expression in patient fibroblasts

We also quantified the PLP1 gene expression in fibroblasts from the patient and compared it to expression in normal control fibroblasts and fibroblasts from male patients with classical tandem PLP1 duplications. The duplicated controls and our patient showed a 1.88 and a 5.21-fold increase of the PLP1 expression respectively compared to the normal control. This result confirmed the functional duplication of the PLP1 gene leading to its overexpression in the patient’s fibroblasts.

Precise mapping of the breakpoint using genome walking strategy

To further characterize the insertion site of PLP1 on chromosome 1p36, we performed a genome walking strategy. This molecular procedure allows sequencing of the 1p36 telomeric flanking segment directly adjacent to the breakpoint of the duplicated genomic region of Xq22 (Fig. 2c). The Xq22 segment inserted exactly at the position chr1:140,332 (GRCh37/hg19) on chromosome 1p36. In addition, we identified 2 bp of microhomology shared by the 1p36 and the Xq22 boundaries genomic sequences.

Discussion

We have described the case of a girl with a classical form of PMD due to an insertion of the PLP1 gene into 1p36 autosome. PLP1 gene duplication in boys results in PLP overexpression and subsequent accumulation in the cytoplasm of the myelinating oligodendrocytes, leading to a CNS myelin defect. We demonstrated that the PLP1 transcript is overexpressed in the fibroblasts of our patient with an insertion of an additional copy of PLP1 in chromosome 1p36. It has been proposed that PLP1 expression in fibroblasts is a good cellular model for reflecting the consequences of an altered PLP1 gene dosage [9]. We thus assume that the additional copy of PLP1 led to an overexpression of PLP in oligodendrocytes and that subsequent toxicity in this cell type was responsible for the neurological phenotype. The PLP1 overexpression seems even higher in our patient’s fibroblasts compared to classical tandem duplications in boys. This could be related to the epigenetic state of the chromatin environment in the 1p36 insertion site that could be more favorable to gene expression than the Xq22 PLP1 locus.

Sequence analysis of the boundaries of the Xq22 duplicated segment revealed two nucleotides of microhomology at the telomeric breakpoint junction (Fig. 2c) consistent with a replication based mechanism, such as fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) [10] or microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR) [13]. We cannot rule out that the two-base microhomology observed at the breakpoint occurs by chance and is not related to a replicative-based mechanism. However, it is noteworthy that James Lupski and colleagues firstly described the elegant FoSTeS mechanism precisely at the PLP1 locus [10]. Based on this model, we propose a genomic mechanism to explain the microhomology-based insertion of PLP1 in an autosome (Fig. 3): instead of switching to a template on the sister chromatid, as it has been classically described, the replication fork may switch to chromosome 1p36. Indeed, in the classical model (i.e. intrachomosomal rearrangement), both replication forks may be separated by large genomic sequence leading to extensive duplication or deletion. It is reasonable to believe that the new replication fork reestablish by considering the physical proximity of the new microhomology-based site. Thus, the new replication fork could take place on distinct chromosome if the insertion site is physically close considering the three-dimensional structure of the chromatin in interphase nuclei. This may be supported by the fact that another PLP1 rearrangement involving the 1p36 genomic region has already been described [5].
Fig. 3

Hypothetical model of mechanism for the insertion of PLP1 in 1p36. Based on the FoSTeS mechanism proposed by Lupski and coll. [10] (upper situation) we propose an alternative model to explain the insertion of an extra copy of the PLP1 gene in chromosome 1p36 (lower situation)

Despite several primer combinations and PCR conditions we were unable to obtain the second breakpoint junction. The inability to obtain a PCR product for the centromeric breakpoint may be related to the complexity of the rearrangement at this breakpoint. Indeed, the PLP1-custom aCGH revealed a triplicated segment embedded in the PLP1 duplication from chrX:103,230,500 to chrX:103,317,500 (Fig. 2a). Triplications of the PLP1 gene have already been described and are associated with a more severe phenotype compared with patients with duplications [2, 3]. However, in our case, the triplicated segment did not include the PLP1 gene. This is consistent with the mild phenotype of our patient compared to PMD boys with three copies of PLP1. It has been proposed that triplications at the PLP1 locus result from a duplication-inverted triplication-duplication (DUP-TRP/INV-DUP) likely based on a replication based mechanism and that relies on the presence of segmental duplications in an inverted orientation [14]. Interestingly, the triplicated segment observed in our case occurred between two segmental duplications encompassing the H2BFXP pseudogenes localized 60 Kb from each other in an inverted direction. This triplicated segment further illustrates the complexity of the observed rearrangement.

Conclusion

Here we describe the case of a girl with a classical form of PMD due to an insertion of a 752 Kb Xq22 region containing the whole PLP1 gene into 1p36 autosome. This rearrangement harbors a two base-pair microhomology at one of the breakpoint suggesting a replication based mechanism such as FoSTeS or MMBIR. In addition to PLP1 duplications, other genomic rearrangements responsible for PMD, including deletions [15, 16], and translocations [4] have been described. Complex genomic rearrangements including duplication-inverted triplications [2, 3] and complex duplications consisting of two duplicated fragments interspersed with a segment without copy number variation [6] have also been identified at the PLP1 locus. Our result further emphasizes the large diversity of the genomic rearrangement involving the PLP1 gene probably based on the complexity of the genomic architecture [7]. Finally, from a clinical point of view, careful consideration should be given to girls with classical PMD clinical features since they usually experience complex PLP1 genomic alteration with distinct risk of inheritance. FISH analysis should thus be considered, in addition to copy number evaluation and PLP1 gene sequencing, to detect those complex rearrangements in girls with PMD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from ELA Foundation (2009-007I4AV2) and “Les amis de Ianis” association (Ploudaniel, France).

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian(s) for gene analysis and for collection of data.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UF de Génétique moléculaire, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP
(2)
Inserm U1141, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Robert Debré
(3)
New adresse: Unité de Génétique Somatique, Institut Curie
(4)
UF de Cytogénétique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP
(5)
Paediatric Neurology, P&A Kyriakou Paed. Hospital, Athens Medical School
(6)
Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing
(7)
ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine
(8)
Neurologie et maladie métabolique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP
(9)
IUH, Hôpital Saint-Louis
(10)
Imagerie pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP

References

  1. Woodward KJ. The molecular and cellular defects underlying Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2008;10:e14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wolf NI, Sistermans EA, Cundall M, Hobson GM, Davis-Williams AP, Palmer R, et al. Three or more copies of the proteolipid protein gene PLP1 cause severe Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. Brain J Neurol. 2005;128(4):743–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Shimojima K, Mano T, Kashiwagi M, Tanabe T, Sugawara M, Okamoto N, et al. Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease caused by a duplication-inverted triplication-duplication in chromosomal segments including the PLP1 region. Eur J Med Genet. 2012;55(6–7):400–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fonseca ACS, Bonaldi A, Costa SS, Freitas MR, Kok F, Vianna-Morgante AM. PLP1 duplication at the breakpoint regions of an apparently balanced t(X;22) translocation causes Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease in a girl. Clin Genet. 2013;83(2):169–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yiu EM, Farrell SA, Soman T. Classic Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease in a girl with an unbalanced chromosomal translocation and functional duplication of PLP1. Mov Disord. 2009;24(14):2171–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho CM, Bartnik M, Pehlivan D, Fang P, Shen J, Lupski JR. Evidence for disease penetrance relating to CNV size: Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease and manifesting carriers with a familial 11 Mb duplication at Xq22. Clin Genet. 2012;81(6):532–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dittwald P, Gambin T, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR, Stankiewicz P, et al. Inverted low-copy repeats and genome instability--a genome-wide analysis. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(1):210–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertelsen B, Tümer Z, Ravn K. Three new loci for determining X chromosome inactivation patterns. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(5):537–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Regis S, Grossi S, Corsolini F, Biancheri R, Filocamo M. PLP1 gene duplication causes overexpression and alteration of the PLP/DM20 splicing balance in fibroblasts from Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease patients. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(6):548–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee JA, Carvalho CMB, Lupski JR. A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell. 2007;131(7):1235–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Regis S, Biancheri R, Bertini E, Burlina A, Lualdi S, Bianco MG, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in five Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease patients with PLP1 gene duplications. Clin Genet. 2008;73(7):279–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Woodward K, Kirtland K, Dlouhy S, Raskind W, Bird T, Malcolm S, et al. X inactivation phenotype in carriers of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease: skewed in carriers of a duplication and random in carriers of point mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8(6):449–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(1):e1000327.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Carvalho CM, Ramocki MB, Pehlivan D, Franco LM, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Fang P, et al. Inverted genomic segments and complex triplication rearrangements are mediated by inverted repeats in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1074–14081.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Inoue K, Osaka H, Thurston VC, Clarke JT, Yoneyama A, Rosenbarker L, et al. Genomic rearrangements resulting in PLP1 deletion occur by nonhomologous end joining and cause different dysmyelinating phenotypes in males and females. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(4):838–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Torisu H, Iwaki A, Takeshita K, Hiwatashi A, Sanefuji M, Fukumaki Y, et al. Clinical and genetic characterization of a 2-year-old boy with complete PLP1 deletion. Brain Dev. 2012;34(10):852–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Masliah-Planchon et al. 2015

Advertisement