Skip to main content
Download PDF

French database of children and adolescents with Prader-Willi syndrome

BMC Medical Genetics volume 9, Article number: 89 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare multisystem genetic disease leading to severe complications mainly related to obesity. We strongly lack information on the natural history of this complex disease and on what factors are involved in its evolution and its outcome. One of the objectives of the French reference centre for Prader-Willi syndrome set-up in 2004 was to set-up a database in order to make the inventory of Prader-Willi syndrome cases and initiate a national cohort study in the area covered by the centre.

Description

the database includes medical data of children and adolescents with Prader-Willi syndrome, details about their management, socio-demographic data on their families, psychological data and quality of life of the parents. The tools and organisation used to ensure data collection and data quality in respect of good clinical practice procedures are discussed, and main characteristics of our Prader-Willi population at inclusion are presented.

Conclusion

this database covering all the aspects of PWS clinical, psychological and social profiles, including familial psychological and quality of life will be a powerful tool for retrospective studies concerning this complex and multi factorial disease and could be a basis for the design of future prospective multicentric studies. The complete database and the Stata.do files are available to any researcher wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes and can be provided upon request to the corresponding author.

Peer Review reports

Background

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder related to the lack of expression of paternal genes in the q11-q13 region of chromosome 15 first described in 1956 [1]. The incidence of PWS is about one out of 25000 births [2–4], most cases are sporadic and familial cases are rare. PWS infants exhibit severe hypotonia already present at birth that partially improves, explaining in part suckling and swallowing troubles, failure to thrive (i.e. failure to get weight besides normal or increased caloric intake) as well as delayed psycho-motor development [5–7]. After this initial phase of about 2 years, the most striking sign appears: an early and severe obesity related to an increasing appetite and the decrease of satiety with an overwhelming eating obsession [8]. Furthermore, a wide range of associated troubles is reported in children, adolescents and adults: low and delayed motor and oral-motor skills, learning disabilities, growth hormone and sex hormones deficiencies probably due to an unknown hypothalamic dysfunction and resulting in short stature, increased body fat with a decreased lean mass, cryptorchidism and absence or blunted puberty [8]. Other common concerns include strabismus, scoliosis, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypoventilation, heart failure, skin problems, sleep disturbances and skin picking (sometimes severe). Early diagnosis confirmed by genetic analysis combined with multidisciplinary care including hormonal therapies can dramatically smooth over PWS troubles and improve the quality of life of these patients and their family [9–13]. However, the constant and long-term need for food restriction, behaviour management and medical care may be stressful for PWS patients and family members [14, 15].

In 2003, the French Ministry of Health launched a strategic plan to optimize the diagnosis and the care of people with rare disorders and strongly encouraged the setting-up of reference centres for rare diseases. Since the late 90's, French teams involved in PWS care had initiated collaborations to share clinical knowledge and experience and in 2004, the French Ministry of Health agreed to approve a reference centre for Prader-Willi syndrome, covering the southern half of the country. In 2007 the reference centre was asked to extend to the whole country with the help of the French family association. PWS reference centre, as other reference centres, has three main goals: optimize patient's diagnosis, care and management throughout life, inform and train health professionals and develop and/or support clinical, epidemiological and basic research projects. The aim of this article is to describe the database constructed to reach one of the first objectives of PWS reference centre: to take inventory of PWS cases and initiate a cohort study in the area covered by the centre. This database will be of primary interest to improve the knowledge of PWS disease: it will be a powerful tool for future specific research projects such as epidemiological studies. We strongly lack information on the natural history of this severe disease, on factors involved in its evolution and on the outcomes of these children. There are few cohort studies [16–19] and few data related to overall PWS patients and family's cares are available. To our knowledge, there is no published database covering all the aspects of PWS clinical, psychological and social profiles, including familial psychological, quality of life and type of care. Data collected could be added to the European database in development [20] as our team participated to the French group of the European database.

Construction and content

Our objective was to describe in a cross sectional approach clinical and psychological characteristics of children and adolescents with PWS, their management and follow-up as well as their parents' psychological profile and quality of life. Searches of PWS physicians' medical records, PWS patients association listing and genetic diagnosis laboratory databases allowed us to estimate the total eligible PWS patients, about 180 in the reference centre area in 2004. Based on the estimated prevalence of the disease ranging from 1/25 000 to 1/30 000 and a total population of 260 000 births per year in the area, the theoretical calculated number fell between 164 and 198 children and adolescents. All of the paediatric endocrinologists (public and private) taking care of PWS patients, epidemiologists and psychologists of the reference centre have been involved in study design, forms building and validation processes to ensure data collection feasibility and data quality. This first step was of primary interest because the huge amount of data that could be gathered from these PWS patients presenting severe multiple pathologies had to be sorted out and simplified in order to obtain standardized questionnaires covering most of the components of this complex disease and adapted to physicians' work environment and habits. Questionnaires' design has been discussed during five meetings and was completed in 1 year. Consensus has been reach on i) a baseline form including Medical and Socio-Demographic data (MSD form) filled in by patient's physician and a familial psychological and quality of life form filled in by the parents ii) a yearly follow-up form including medical and psychological data of the patients iii) this questionnaire will be subsequently modified and adapted to adult patients.

Medical and socio-demographic data at inclusion

MSD form is a 265-item paper questionnaire designed to be filled in by each PWS patient's physician, according to clinical examination and medical records information. When completed, MSD form is mailed to the coordination team and data are entered into the database by a Clinical Research Associate (CRA). Variables of the MSD form are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 List of variables of the medical and socio-demographic (MSD) form
Full size table

Mean time length required to complete this first MSD form has been estimated to be 60 min (30 min during medical consultation and 30 min dedicated to source data collection). As in some cases PWS medical records may require a long time to be inspected, five of the nine centres required CRA assistance to fill in clinical data questionnaires.

Familial psychological data at inclusion

Familial psychological data were gathered using 3 different paper forms, given and explained at a routine visit, and filled in by the parents at home. In total, time length required is about 45 to 60 min.

The first form corresponds to the Child Behaviour CheckList questionnaire (CBCL), a well validated instrument designed to assess parent-reported behavioural and emotional problems [21–24]. It is appropriate for use in 1.5 to 18 years old- children and adolescent populations and has been widely used in Prader Willi studies [25–28]. We asked both parents to fill the CBCL together unless it was impossible for familial reasons. CBCL questionnaires have been computed using "Assessment Data Manager, version 4.0" software to compute raw scores, T-scores and clinical translated scores (clinical-borderline-normal) [21, 22].

The second form contains three validated scales evaluating parent-reported stress, anxiety and depression. Each parent has to complete his/her own questionnaire separately.

- the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS14) [29] is validated to measure last month's sensed stress. It is scaled in a positive direction with a higher score denoting higher stress. PSS-14 has been widely used in psychological studies due to its psychometrical properties [30].

- Spielberger Test Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Y form, 20 items) [31] measures trait-anxiety (trait-anxiety is a personality feature, a usual and stable anxiety trend). It is scaled in a positive direction and raw scores are transformed in T-scores according to French norms [32]. STAI is widely used in psychological studies and has good psychometrical properties.

- Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a 13-item scale [33] which allows depression severity measurement as well as nervous depression versus anxiety differentiation. The BDI-II is one of the most widely accepted clinical instruments [30, 34]. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology. Participants with scores in the moderate-to-severe range, suggesting clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms, were identified by the psychologist of the reference centre; patient's physician was informed and offered assistance to obtain further assessment and treatment. This procedure is outlined to families at the time the familial psychological questionnaires are given to them by the physician.

The third form is the 1997 World Health Organisation Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). This 26-item questionnaire is a sound, cross-culturally valid assessment of quality of life (QOL), as reflected by the four domains explored (physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment) and its two individually scored items about an individual's overall perception of QOL and health. The four domains and the two individual items are scaled in a positive direction with higher scores denoting higher QOL. WHOQOL-BREF must be filled in by each parent. This questionnaire has been widely and internationally used, translated into French and validated, and reported to be sensitive, accurate and homogeneous [35].

The coordination centre in Toulouse conducted a pilot study involving 12 Prader-Willi's families in order to confirm the feasibility of a familial psychological study. Families first received an explanation from the psychologist, filled in the questionnaires at home and mailed them to the coordination team of the reference centre (prepaid envelops). In total, 18 out of 24 questionnaires (75%) were returned in 4 weeks. None of the parents reported difficulties about understanding and/or answering the whole questionnaire, nor psychological difficulties related to BDI-II questionnaire. We did not perform a statistical analysis on these questionnaires.

Follow-up form

A yearly follow-up paper form has to be completed to supply the longitudinal part of the study. It is filled in by investigators according to patient's clinical examination and medical records information. When completed, the follow-up form is mailed to the coordination team and data are entered into the database by a CRA. Variables of the MSD follow-up form are summarized in Table 2. Mean time length required to complete the follow-up form has been estimated to 30 min (15 min during medical consultation and 15 min dedicated to source data collection).

Table 2 List of variables of the follow-up medical and socio-demographic form (follow-up MSD form)
Full size table

The follow-up form includes a psychological questionnaire evaluating the overall psychopathology of patients and filled in by the parents. This questionnaire has not been validated yet but is routinely used for adults with PWS by the coordination centre, which has been involved in the care of adult PWS patients for many years [36]. We chose this specific questionnaire in order to evaluate the evolution of psychological troubles from childhood to adulthood. Mean time to complete this questionnaire is about 10 minutes.

Construction

Data entry is done using Microsoft® Access 2003 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA 98052-6399, USA). Database structure is as follows: Main table contains administrative data plus MSD form items. For each of the three psychological and QOL questionnaires, scores are stored in a table linked one-to-many to the main table. One table linked one-to-many to the main table contains annual follow-up items. A user friendly interface including rolling menus and data entry forms has been built to allow database use by unskilled users. In data entry forms, fields are organized in regard to paper forms presentation and include limits which where applicable to minimize the risk of error during the data entry process.

A set of Stata 8.2 programs (StataCorp, College Station, Texas 77845, USA) has been developed to quicken and secure data management procedures prior to statistical analyses. Briefly, all raw tables are match-merged, variables are labelled, recoded when needed and calculated variables are computed to generate a Stata file containing the whole study data. This procedure is completed with a set of calculated coherence controls. Birth weight and birth length are expressed in Standard Deviation (SD) according to Usher and Mc Lean tables [37], BMI Z-scores are calculated and obesity defined as BMI > 97th centile, according to French reference curves for BMI [38].

Computing time required for this complete procedure is about five minutes and the entire procedure can be done by unskilled users, simply clicking on Stata.do files icons. All calculations are recorded in a log file to ensure computation traceability, and log files are archived with main data and results files every time a statistical analysis is performed.

Data collection

Database and data collection have been approved by the 2 French national data protection authorities, the "Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l'Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé" (Advisory council for treatment of information in terms of healthcare research) and the "Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés" (French Data Protection Authority). We got the approval of the president of the local ethic committee (CPP 1 Toulouse, Dr H. Grandjean). Data collection is monitored by CRA in respect of Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) procedures. All patients with Prader-Willi syndrome aged 0 to 20 living in the region covered by the reference centre are eligible to participate. Exclusion criterion is lack of confirmation of PWS by genetic diagnosis. The study is presented to all eligible patients by their physician during a medical consultation. After the informed written consent is obtained from the patient and his family, investigators fill in clinical forms and give psychological and QOL questionnaires to the parents to be completed at home. Parents are asked to fill PWS psychopathology questionnaire together on behalf of the Prader-Willi child and each parent is asked to fill its own psychological and QOL questionnaire. All paper forms are returned to the reference centre coordination team and entered into the database by CRA as previously described. Data entry of all study forms at inclusion (MSD, psychological and QOL) is done within one hour and a half, including intermediary CBCL scores calculation using Assessment Data Manager software. Data entry of follow-up forms is done within half an hour.

We introduced a double check procedure in order to obtain high-quality data. i) patient's data are checked by CRA at the time of data entry, using data management forms to display summary or detailed data entered in the database. These forms are written-protected to avoid unwanted data modification and can be sorted and filtered in various ways. ii) a set of calculated coherence controls is computed monthly by CRA using Stata 8.2 software as previously described.

Error correction procedure is as follows: a standardized request form is sent to the investigator to be filled in and returned to the coordination team. When the investigator answer is received, database values are corrected if needed, date of corrections and name of CRA being noted on request form. Request form is then archived with source data.

Data entry quality has been assessed prior to the statistical analysis of the transversal study (work in progress). We randomly selected 10% of patient's medical records and we compared source data with database data. Low error rate (0.3%) confirmed the quality of the tools and procedures used in this project. Further regular data quality controls are scheduled, a double data entry procedure being required if 5% error rate is exceeded.

Utility

This database will be a powerful tool to collect data on patients presenting this complex and multi system disease and will be a basis for the design of future prospective multicentric studies. It might allow us to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of follow-up strategies used in everyday clinical practice, taking in account clinical improvements as well as patient's psychological status and parents psychological and quality of life repercussions.

Moreover this database could help sharing experience with other worldwide teams involved in management and care of PWS patients; particularly those who also set-up databases and could provide data to support the onset of a future European PWS database.

This publication could also provide landmarks for other teams having such a project and might be of help for teams interested in setting up cohort studies in other rare diseases involving some of the PWS related troubles.

Discussion

Nowadays, PWS research is clearly active as shown by the outcome of expert's meetings (the 1st one held in Zurich in 2002 and the 2nd in Toulouse in 2006). The genetic research showed evidence about some phenotype-genotype correlations [39–42] and many clinical studies mainly based on the effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment have been published in children [43–46] and adults with PWS [47–49]. In addition, post-marketing databases [50, 51] reported strong evidence for hormonal therapy benefit and behaviour management efficiency.

Most of the data and particularly history and care came from clinical studies involving a small number of patients enrolled by few highly specialized teams, leading not only to limit statistical power but also to emphasize bias related to inclusion criterion, patients' selection and team's routine clinical practice. Moreover these studies being focused on a set of clinical and/or biological variables are unable to reflect the whole patients' profile. But, on another hand, setting up a prospective study exploring interactions between clinical treatment, psychological status and familial context does not seem to be feasible, mainly due to the high number of patients needed to be included which is not compatible with a rare disease. At last, most of clinical studies are of relatively short duration and cannot reflect the long term evolution of the disease nor period-specific difficulties related to clinical management such as childhood to adult transition.

This database will be of primary interest to improve the knowledge of PWS disease: it will be a powerful tool for future specific research projects such as epidemiological studies. Main characteristics of the population at inclusion are listed in table 3. Today, two years after the beginning of the inclusions, 146 patients (81% of estimated PWS cases) have been included and none of the PWS families refused to be enrolled in the study. Therefore, we consider that making the actual database to become an exhaustive register including all eligible patients at a national level is a realistic and feasible goal that will be one of the reference centre objectives in the years to come. The follow-up of such an exhaustive cohort could allow us to improve the knowledge of the evolution of this disease, to optimize therapies and to adjust multidisciplinary care organisation, taking into account not only the PWS patients' clinical profile but also their familial environment.

Table 3 Characteristics of the population at inclusion
Full size table

In that way, we noticed that data collection has been considered of great help by PWS physicians for everyday clinical practice: transversal study questionnaires have been reported to be a helpful tool to summarize PWS medical history and yearly follow-up forms will provide an overview of the disease evolution that will help physicians to underline the most topical issues of patient follow-up and care. In that way, it can be considered as a clinical tool to be used in complement of patient's medical records.

We chose to start with paper forms centralized by a coordination centre then entered into the database by CRA rather than internet forms filled in by physicians. This organization appears to be adapted to a rare disease study. We also noted that giving life to the investigators' team through meetings, e-mail newsletters, phone calls and some further CRA travels to give help, maintained the motivation and ensured the long-term involvement of all members.

A further database development focused on adult PWS is planed for the next year in a national basis and links between the 2 databases will be developed and will allow us to describe the long term follow-up of early diagnosed patients receiving multidisciplinary care. This two-step development has been decided because relevant data to be gathered are clearly different between adults (i.e. aged more than 20) and younger PWS patients. This difference is due on one hand to the natural evolution of the disease and on the other hand to the history of PWS diagnosis and treatment: PWS genetic diagnosis became available in routine in the early 90's [52] and has been followed by major improvements in therapies, medical care and follow-up organization. Therefore, for PWS patients aged less than twenty, PWS genetic diagnosis was available in the first years of life, hormonal therapies were widely used in respect of guidelines and multi-disciplinary care of the disease became widespread. In contrast, for PWS patients aged more than twenty, PWS diagnosis has been based on clinical signs then confirmed or sometimes undermined by genetic diagnosis many years later. Hormonal therapy was not routinely prescribed and psychological and social cares were not developed enough. Therefore studying the adult PWS population requires a specific tool, adapted to the heterogeneity of the population and to the widespread differences related to psychosocial status. Improving our knowledge of the nowadays adult PWS patients' profile will help to refine specific follow-up as well as to adapt childhood to adult transition strategies.

Conclusion

In 2007 the French ministry of health has extended the PWS reference centre area to the whole French territory, prompting us to implement the database with the patients of our whole country. This can be done without software modifications, allowing us to focus on the training of newly involved medical teams and on the study management organisation. Adult database is also in progress and a second CRA has been recruited to ensure the success of this cohort study extension.

Availability and requirements

Complete listings of variables of the MSD and follow-up forms are available at http://www.chu-toulouse.fr/spip.php?rubrique892. The complete database and the Stata.do files are available to any researcher wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes and can be provided upon request to the corresponding author. Links between this database ant the European database are in discussion.

References

  1. Prader A, Labhart A, Willi H: Ein Syndrom von Adipositas, Kleinwuchs, Kryptorchidismus und Oligophrenie nach myotoniertigem Zustand im Neugerborenenalter. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1956, 6: 1260-1261.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whittington JE, Holland AJ, Webb T, Butler J, Clarke D, Boer H: Population prevalence and estimated birth incidence and mortality rate for people with Prader-Willi syndrome in one UK Health Region. J Med Genet. 2001, 38: 792-798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith A, Egan J, Ridley G, Haan E, Montgomery P, Williams K, Elliott E: Birth prevalence of Prader-Willi syndrome in Australia. Arch Dis Child. 2003, 88: 263-264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogels A, Ende Van Den J, Keymolen K, Mortier G, Devriendt K, Legius E, Fryns JP: Minimum prevalence, birth incidence, and cause of death for Prader-Willi syndrome in Flanders. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004, 12: 238-240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aughton D, Cassidy SB: Physical features of Prader-Willi syndrome in neonates. Am J Dis Child. 1990, 144 (11): 1251-1254.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fridman C, Kok F, Koiffmann CP: Hypotonic infants and the Prader-Willi syndrome. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2000, 76 (3): 246-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trifiro G, Livieri C, Bosio L, Gargantini L, Corrias A, Pozzan G, Crino A, Genetic Obesity Study Group of the Italian Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology: Neonatal hypotonia: don't forget the Prader-Willi syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92: 1085-1089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler MG, Lee PDK, Whitman BY: Management of Prader-Willi syndrome. 2006, Springer, NY, USA, 3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Eiholzer U, Whitman BY: A comprehensive team approach to the management of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 17: 1153-1175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benarroch F, Hirsch HJ, Genstil L, Landau YE, Gross-Tsur V: Prader-willi syndrome: medical prevention and behavioral challenges. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2007, 16: 695-708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burman P, Ritzen EM, Lindgren AC: Endocrine dysfunction in Prader-Willi syndrome: a review with special reference to GH. Endocr Rev. 2001, 22: 787-799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carrel AL, Myers SE, Whitman BY, Allen DB: Benefits of long-term GH therapy in Prader-Willi syndrome: a 4-year study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 1581-1585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bacheré N, Diene G, Delagnes V, Molinas C, Moulin P, Tauber M: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary care reduce the hospitalisation time and duration of tube feeding and prevent early obesity in PWS infants. Horm Res. 2008, 69: 45-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nolan ME: Anticipatory guidance for parents of Prader-Willi children. Pediatr Nurs. 2003, 29: 427-430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Hooren RH, Widdershoven GA, Candel MJ, van den Borne BW, Curfs LM: Between control and freedom in the care for persons with Prader-Willi syndrome: an analysis of preferred interventions by caregivers. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 63: 223-231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Butler JV, Whittington JE, Holland AJ, Boer H, Clarke D, Webb T: Prevalence of, and risk factors for, physical ill-health in people with Prader-Willi syndrome: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002, 44: 248-255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomson AK, Glasson EJ, Bittles AH: A long-term population-based clinical and morbidity review of Prader-Willi syndrome in Western Australia. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006, 50: 69-78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin HY, Lin SP, Yen JL, Lee YJ, Huang CY, Hung HY, Hsu CH, Kao HA, Chang JH, Chiu NC, Ho CS, Chao MC, Niu DM, Tsai LP, Kuo PL: Prader-Willi syndrome in Taiwan. Pediatr Int. 2007, 49: 375-379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grugni G, Crinò A, Bosio L, Corrias A, Cuttini M, De Toni T, Di Battista E, Franzese A, Gargantini L, Greggio N, Iughetti L, Livieri C, Naselli A, Pagano C, Pozzan G, Ragusa L, Salvatoni A, Trifirò G, Beccaria L, Bellizzi M, Bellone J, Brunani A, Cappa M, Caselli G, Cerioni V, Delvecchio M, Giardino D, Iannì F, Memo L, Pilotta A, Pomara C, Radetti G, Sacco M, Sanzari A, Sartorio A, Tonini G, Vettor R, Zaglia F, Chiumello G, on behalf of the Genetic Obesity Study Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (ISPED): The Italian National Survey for Prader-Willi syndrome: An epidemiologic study. Am J Med Genet A. 2008, Jan 17;

  20. Holland AJ, Cohen O, Boasis M, Curfs L, Dudley O, Horsthemke B, Lindgren AC, Nourissier C, Vogels A, Whittington J: The European PWS Clinical Research Database. Abstract book of the 6th International IPWSO Conference. 2007, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  21. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA: Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms and Profiles. 2000, Burlington, VT:University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families

    Google Scholar 

  22. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA: Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. 2001, Burlington, VT:University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fombonne E, Chechdan F, Carradec AM, et al: Le CBCL: un instrument pour la recherche en psychiatrie de l'enfant. Psychiatr Psychobiol. 1988, 3: 409-418.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vermeersch S, Fombonne E: Le CBCL: résultats préliminaires de la standardisation de la version française. Neuropsychiatrie de l'enfance et de l'adolescence. 1997, 45: 613-620.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dykens EM, Hodap RM, Walsh K, Nash LJ: Adaptive and maladaptive behavior in Prader-Willi syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992, 31: 1131-1136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Lieshout CF, De Meyer RE, Curfs LM, Koot HM, Fryns JP: Problem behaviors and personality of children and adolescents with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998, 23: 111-120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Curfs LM, Verhulst FC, Fryns JP: Behavioral and emotional problems in youngsters with Prader-Willi syndrome. Genet Couns. 1999, 2 (1): 33-41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Graham JM, Rosenr B, Dykens E, Visootsak J: Behavioral features of CHARGE syndrome (Hall-Hittner syndrome) comparison with Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 133A (3): 240-247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983, 24 (4): 385-396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Dantzer R: Introduction à la psychologie de la Santé. 1994, Paris: PUF

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spielberger CD: Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Form Y) ("Self evaluation questionnaire"). 1983, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Paulhan I: Manuel pour l'inventaire d'anxiété trait-état (forme Y). 1990, Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée

    Google Scholar 

  33. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK: BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory: manual. 1996, San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp, 2

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bouvard M, Cottraux J: Protocoles et échelles d'évaluation en psychologie. 2002, Paris: Masson

    Google Scholar 

  35. Skevington SM, Lofty M, O'Connell KA, WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 299-310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jauregi J, Arias C, Vegas O, Alén F, Martinez S, Copet P, Thuilleaux D: A neuropsychological assessment of frontal cognitive functions in Prader-Willi syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007, 51: 350-365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Usher R, McLean F: Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 1969, 74: 901-910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rolland-Cachera MF, Cole TJ, Sempe M, Tichet J, Rossignol C, Charraud A: Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991, 45: 13-21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Robinson W, Lohmann D, Kaya-Westerloh S, Passarge E, Horsthemke B: Genotype-phenotype correlation in a series of 167 deletion and non-deletion patients with Prader-Willi syndrome. Hum Genet. 1995, 96: 638-643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cassidy SB, Forsythe M, Heeger S, Nicholls RD, Schork N, Benn P, Schwartz S: Comparison of phenotype between patients with Prader-Willi syndrome due to deletion 15q and uniparental disomy 15. Am J Med Genet. 1997, 68: 433-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Butler MG, Bittel DC, Kibiryeva N, Talebizadeh Z, Thompson T: Behavioral differences among subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome and type I or type II deletion and maternal disomy. Pediatrics. 2004, 113 (3 Pt 1): 565-573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Varela MC, Kok F, Setian N, Kim CA, Koiffmann CP: Impact of molecular mechanisms, including deletion size, on Prader-Willi syndrome phenotype: study of 75 patients. Clin Genet. 2005, 67: 47-52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Allen DB, Carrel AL: Growth hormone therapy for Prader-Willi syndrome: a critical appraisal. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 17: 1297-1306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Angulo MA, Castro-Magana M, Lamerson M, Arguello R, Accacha S, Khan A: Final adult height in children with Prader-Willi syndrome with and without human growth hormone treatment. Am J Med Genet A. 2007, 143A (13): 1456-1461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Galassetti P, Saetrum Opgaard O, Cassidy SB, Pontello A: Nutrient intake and body composition variables in Prader-Willi syndrome–effect of growth hormone supplementation and genetic subtype. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 20: 491-500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Myers SE, Whitman BY, Carrel AL, Moerchen V, Bekx MT, Allen DB: Two years of growth hormone therapy in young children with Prader-Willi syndrome: physical and neurodevelopmental benefits. Am J Med Genet A. 2007, 143 (5): 443-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hoybye C, Thoren M: Somatropin therapy in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. Treat Endocrinol. 2004, 3: 153-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hoybye C, Thoren M, Bohm B: Cognitive, emotional, physical and social effects of growth hormone treatment in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005, 49: 245-252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bertella L, Mori I, Grugni G, Pignatti R, Ceriani F, Molinari E, Ceccarelli A, Sartorio A, Vettor R, Semenza C: Quality of life and psychological well-being in GH-treated, adult PWS patients: a longitudinal study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007, 51: 302-311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Craig ME, Cowell CT, Larsson P, Zipf WB, Reiter EO, Albertsson Wikland K, Ranke MB, Price DA, KIGS International Board: Growth hormone treatment and adverse events in Prader-Willi syndrome: data from KIGS (the Pfizer International Growth Database). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006, 65: 178-185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Tauber M: Effects of growth hormone treatment in children presenting with Prader-Willi syndrome: the KIGS experience. Growth hormone therapy in Pediatrics – 20 years of KIGS. Edited by: Ranke MB, Price DA, Reiter EO. 2007, Basel: Karger, 377-387.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Malzac P, Moncla A, Voelckel MA, Livet MO, Girardot L, Mattei MG, Mattei JF: Prader-Willi syndrome: diagnostic strategy with a cytogenetic and molecular approach. Neuromuscul Disord. 1993, 3: 493-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge all the members of the French Reference Centre for PWS: F Lorenzini (Division of Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, France); M Jésuran-Pérelroizen, L Nègre-Pagès (Division of Endocrinology, Genetics, Gynaecology and Bone Diseases, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France); D Thuilleaux, J Jauregui, G Demeer, P Copet (Hôpital marin d'Hendaye, Hendaye, France); P Barat, S Boulard, M Colle, O Puel, D Lacombe (Hôpital des Enfants, Bordeaux, France); F Dalla Vale, C Jeandel (Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France); P Garnier (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Grenoble, France); H Grandjean (National Institute of Health and medical research INSERM U558, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse; Unit of clinical research, Hospital Toulouse, France); A Lienhardt (Hôpital de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Limoges, France); JC Mas, K Wagner (Hôpital Archet, Nice, France); G Simonin, A Moncla, MA Voelckel (Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France);M Nicolino (Hôpital Debrousse, Lyon, France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Référence du syndrome de Prader-Willi, Division of Endocrinology, Genetics, Gynaecology and Bone Diseases, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France

    Catherine Molinas, Gwenaelle Diene, Melanie Glattard & Maithe Tauber

  2. Division of Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, France

    Laurent Cazals

  3. National Institute of Health and Medical Research INSERM U558, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

    Catherine Arnaud

  4. Unit of Clinical Research, Hospital Toulouse, France

    Catherine Arnaud

Authors
  1. Catherine Molinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurent Cazals
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gwenaelle Diene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melanie Glattard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Catherine Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maithe Tauber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

French Reference Centre for PWS (FrRefC-PWS)

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maithe Tauber.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors from the coordination of the French reference centre (CM, GD, MG, MT) received funding from Pfizer for setting-up the PWS database. MT received consulting fees from Pfizer.

Authors' contributions

CM was responsible for collecting and entering the data in the database. LC constructed the database and wrote the Stata programs. CM and LC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GD was responsible for the design of the MSD form and MG for the design of the familial psychological forms. CA supervised the database construction and provided methodological expertise. MT as coordinator of the reference centre supervised all the aspects of the work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molinas, C., Cazals, L., Diene, G. et al. French database of children and adolescents with Prader-Willi syndrome. BMC Med Genet 9, 89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-9-89

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-9-89

Keywords

  • Reference Centre
  • Request Form
  • Coordination Team
  • Data Entry Form
  • Medical Record Information

BMC Medical Genetics

ISSN: 1471-2350

Contact us