Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia: Novel mutations in the REEP1 gene (SPG31)

  • Katharina J Schlang1,
  • Larissa Arning1,
  • Joerg T Epplen1 and
  • Susanne Stemmler1Email author
BMC Medical Genetics20089:71

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-9-71

Received: 18 March 2008

Accepted: 21 July 2008

Published: 21 July 2008

Abstract

Background

Mutations in the SPG4 gene (spastin) and in the SPG3A gene (atlastin) account for the majority of 'pure' autosomal dominant form of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). Recently, mutations in the REEP1 gene were identified to cause autosomal dominant HSP type SPG31. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of REEP1 mutations in a cohort of 162 unrelated Caucasian index patients with 'pure' HSP and a positive family history (at least two persons per family presented symptoms).

Methods

162 patients were screened for mutations by, both, DHPLC and direct sequencing.

Results

Ten mutations were identified in the REEP1 gene, these included eight novel mutations comprising small insertions/deletions causing frame shifts and subsequently premature stop codons, one nonsense mutation and one splice site mutation as well as two missense mutations. Both missense mutations and the splice site mutation were not identified in 170 control subjects.

Conclusion

In our HSP cohort we found pathogenic mutations in 4.3% of cases with autosomal dominant inheritance. Our results confirm the previously observed mutation range of 3% to 6.5%, respectively, and they widen the spectrum of REEP1 mutations.

Background

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder characterised by progressive spasticity, weakness and hyperreflexia of the lower limbs. Clinically it is divided into a 'pure' or uncomplicated form with progressive spasticity as major symptom, associated with brisk reflexes, muscle weakness, positive Babinski's sign and urinary urgency as well as a 'complicated' form accompanied with other neurological abnormalities, i.e. retinal pigmentation, mental retardation, deafness, optic atrophy or seizures [1, 2]. So far, over 35 loci have been identified for autosomal dominant, recessive and X-linked HSP. The autosomal dominant HSP is indeed the main mode of inheritance, accounting for about 70–80% of all HSPs in Western countries, and it is predominantly associated with pure forms [1]. The occurrence of recessive HSP amount to 20–30%, whereas X-linked HSP is very rare.

In 15–40% of families with the 'pure' autosomal dominant form of HSP, DNA sequence analysis identified a mutation in the SPG4 gene (spastin) [1] and in ~10% a mutation in the SPG3A gene (atlastin) [2]. In further 18–20% of families gross deletions (of one or more exons) of the SPG4 gene have been found [3, 4]. No pathogenic gross deletions in the SPG3A gene have been demonstrated so far. Mutations in the REEP1 gene (SPG31) were analysed in two studies [5, 6], and pathogenic mutations were identified in 6.5% and 3% of cases, respectively, including one large multi-exonic duplication [5, 6].

Methods

Subjects

162 unrelated patients with clinical symptoms of 'pure' HSP and a positive family history (at least two persons per family presented symptoms) were analysed in this study. Mutations in the SPG4 gene were excluded in all patients and in SPG3A in 152 of the 162 patients. Gross deletions were excluded in half of the patients by MLPA. Control samples from 170 healthy German blood donors were collected at the Department of transfusion medicine of the University Hospital in Essen (Germany). DNA was extracted from EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood by using a standard salting-out method [7]. This study was approved by the institutional review board, informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the Declaration of Helsinki protocols were followed.

PCR

Screening of the entire coding region of the REEP1 gene (seven exons including the flanking intronic sequence, at least 40 bp from each end) was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with consecutive DHPLC analysis. PCR reactions for exon 1 were performed in a total volume of 10 μl, containing 60 ng DNA, 10 mmol of each dNTP DEAZA (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 3 mmol MgCl2 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) 10 pmol of each primer, 0.25 U Taq polymerase Hotstar Taq Plus (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), DMSO 5% and 10 × buffer (contains 15 mM MgCl2); (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR reactions for exons 2 to 7 were performed in a total volume of 12.5 μl, containing 100 ng DNA, 2.5 mmol of each dNTP, 2 mmol MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Genecraft, Lüdinghausen, Germany) and 10 × buffer BioTherm without MgCl2 (Genecraft, Lüdinghausen, Germany). Thermal cycling was performed in a Biometra TGradient (Whatman, Maidstone, Kent, England). For each of the 7 PCR fragments, primer sequences and annealing temperatures are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Primer sequences and annealing temperatures

Amplified segment

Primer

Annealing

temperature

SPG31 Ex 1

F1: ACCAGCTCACCGCCCAATC

R1: GTATTAATAGCCCGAGCCACTGG

56°C/30 cycles

SPG31 Ex 2

F2: AAGATAGAGGTGCCCAAGGATG

R2: TGAGAACTGTGATGAAGGAACTCC

58°C/28 cycles

SPG31 Ex 3

F3: GGAAGGATAGGGAGAAGGCTAC

R3: CCTGAGGTGAGGTTTGAGGC

58°C/28 cycles

SPG31 Ex 4

F4: TTCAAAAGGGCAGTGTTGCTG

R4: ATGACTTGCTGGAGGCAAATGA

58°C/28 cycles

SPG31 Ex 5

F5: GCCAAGCCCAATGCTCAGAG

R5: GGTCCTTAGCCTGTTCTGTGTGG

60°C/28 cycles

SPG31 Ex 6

F6: AGCTCCCTCTTGGCCTTTGTC

R6: GGACTGGGCCTCTCTCAATGA

58°C/28 cycles

SPG31 Ex 7

F7: GAGATTCAGGGAGACCCCAGC

R7: GGAGAGAGAAAAGGCCATGTTTG

60°C/28 cycles

(F: forward primer; R: reverse primer)

DHPLC analyses

DHPLC is a chromatographic mutation analysis technique that is based on temperature-dependent separation of DNA from PCR-amplified DNA fragments [8]. Different schemes for mutation screening were performed using DHPLC, i.e. the WAVE® DNA Fragment Analysis System (Transgenomic, Glasgow, UK) as described [9] with the analysis software Navigator Software (Transgenomic, Glasgow, UK).

PCR mixes were applied in double and four-fold amount (conditions see above) and were performed in total volumes of 25 μl (exons 2 to 7) or 40 μl (exon 1). Additionally the PCR amplicons were heated up to 94°C for 3 min and cooled slowly down to 20°C (30 sec) in a thermocycler (Biometra TGradient, Whatman, Maidstone, Kent, England) before loading onto the WAVE column. The amount of one injection per PCR sample was 5 μl. The probes were analyzed with variable retention times (Table 2) and compared to a chromatogram of a healthy control sequence variation. A variant in exon 3 (c.164C>A, p.Thr55Lys) was genotyped using the WAVE analysis system (no restriction enzyme available).
Table 2

WAVE conditions

Amplified segment

WAVE: oven temperature

time shift

SPG31 exon 1

65°C/70°C

no

SPG31 exon 2

54,5°C/57°C/58°C

no

SPG31 exon 3

59°C/63°C

63°C: 2,0

SPG31 exon 4

56°C/57°C/59°C

59°C: 1,0

SPG31 exon 5

58°C/61,5°C/64°C

no

SPG31 exon 6

61°C/62°C/63°C

no

SPG31 exon 7

58,6°C/60,6°C

no

DNA sequencing

DNA samples with peculiar separation behaviour in DHPLC analysis were directly sequenced using the AMPure- (1st purification) and CleanSeq-Kit (2nd-purification; Beckman, Krefeld, Germany) as described in the manufacturer's instructions on an automated sequencer (MegaBace 1000, GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany; and ABI PRISM 377, DNA Sequencer).

RFLP

Two newly identified sequence variations, c.320T>C, p.Leu107Pro (exon 5) and c.105+6T>C (intron 2), as well as a mutation in the 3'UTR (c.606+43G>T) were genotyped by restriction enzyme digestion. Patient and control samples were amplified using the same primers and conditions as described above. 12.5 μl of PCR products were digested with 0.31 units of Bbv I (intron 2), 0.25 units of Msp I (exon 5) and 0.46 units of BsuRI (3'UTR) at 37°C for 3 hours. The fragments were separated on 2% agarose gels in 1 × TBE buffer (30 min, 200 V) and visualised using ethidium bromide.

In silicoanalysis

Putative functional and splicing effects of the three unclear sequence variations were investigated using the programs ESEfinder release 3.0 [10] and NNSPLICE 0.9 software [11]. ESEfinder identifies putative exon splicing enhancers responsive to the human SR proteins SF2/ASF, SC35, SRp40 and SRp55. NNSPLICE is based on a neural network to predict the presence and relative efficiencies of donor and acceptor sites.

Results and Discussion

In this study we analysed a cohort of 162 patients with the 'pure' autosomal-dominant form of HSP for mutations in the REEP1 gene. In addition, 170 healthy control subjects were analysed for the newly identified sequence variations.

We identified nucleotide exchanges in all exons in comparison to the reference sequence except for exon 1. Ten mutations which include 7 (4.3% of cases) pathogenic mutations (small insertions/deletions, nonsense- and 3'UTR exchanges) and three (1.9% of cases) novel sequence variations (missense and splice site) were identified. Six of these seven pathogenic mutations (three small out of frame deletions, two small out of frame insertion and a nonsense mutation) as well as three unclear sequence variations (two missense and one splice site) have not been described before (Table 3). In detail, we newly identified two small deletions of one nucleotide (c.60delG and c.478delA), one deletion of eight nucleotides (c.340_347delAGTTACGA), an insertion of one nucleotide (c.419_420insG), an insertion of two nucleotides (c.183_184insCT) and a nucleotide exchange which leads to a premature stop codon (c.C345A; p.Try115X). Because DHPLC mutation screening technique is not 100% sensitive [12], sequence alterations might be missed, which would increase the frequency of REEP1 mutations. In three cases more than one symptomatic family member was analysed. There was one more family member tested for the deletions in exon 6 (c.478delA) and in exon 2 (c.60delG) in each case and two additional family members for the insertion (c.419_420insG). The three families are composed of father and son, father and daughter as well as mother and two children. All affected family members show the same mutation. In our HSP cohort the mean age of onset is in the early twenties (3 to 50 years). Two novel variations represent missense mutations (c.164C>A, p.Thr55Lys, c.320T>C, p.Leu107Pro) and the other one a splice site variation in the donor splice site (c.105+6 T>C). The splice site prediction program NNSPLICE 0.9 calculates a score of 0.98 for the wild-type donor of exon/intron 2. The c.105+6 T>C substitution lowers the donor consensus value to 0.88, probably leading to preferential usage of a cryptic donor present 29 bp downstream in intron 2 with a score of 0.64 [gagtcagGTcaggtg].
Table 3

Mutations found in REEP1

 

Nucleotide exchange

Amino acid exchange

SPG31 exon 1

none

 

SPG31 exon 2

c.60delG

p.6fsX

 

c.105+6T>C

 

SPG31 exon 3

c.164C>A

p.Thr55Lys

SPG31 exon 4

c.183_184insCT

p.7fsX

SPG31 exon 5

c.320T>C

p.Leu107Pro

 

c.340_347delAGTTACGA

p.69fsX,

 

c.345C>A

p.Try115X

SPG31 exon 6

c.419_420insG

p.45fsX

 

c.478delA

p.62fsX

SPG31 exon 7

c.606+43G>T*

 

* previously described

In silico analysis with the ESE-finder program revealed that c.164C>A abolishes strong exon splicing enhancer sites for SF2/ASF, SRp40 and SRp55 as well as it leads to a new strong site for SRp55. For c.320T>C the score for a potential binding site for the splicing factors SRp40 strongly increases when substituting the T by C. Thus these sequence exchanges could result in defective splicing of introns, exon skipping, frameshift and introduction of another premature termination codon. In that case, all sequence variations found would be in line with the concept of haploinsufficiency. Unfortunately, we could not test this hypothesis, because, as REEP1 is not expressed in peripheral blood cells [6], we were not able to perform RNA analyses. Furthermore, we also had no further relatives with symptoms of HSP available to be investigated. Segregation analysis for these sequence variations is advisable in order to confirm the pathogenetic relevance. Yet, all unclear sequence variations were absent in 170 healthy controls.

In addition, we identified also common polymorphisms in exon 2 to exon 5 in many cases, which are listed in Table 4. Additionally, we found two further polymorphisms in intron 6 (c.595T>G) and the 3'UTR (c.606+155T>C) in four of the 162 patients in heterozygous state (allele frequency 1.2%).
Table 4

Polymorphisms found in REEP1

 

rs-number/Polymorphism

SPG31 intron 1

rs1863059

SPG31 intron 2

rs1863058

 

rs1863056

SPG31 exon 4

rs2276625

SPG31 intron 5

rs12988844

SPG31 intron 6

c.595-19T>G, G allele: 1,2%

SPG31 3'UTR

c.606+155T>C, C allele: 1,2%

Conclusion

Having identified pathogenic mutations in the REEP1 gene in 4.3% of our HSP cases, previous mutation frequency determinations (6.5% and 3%, respectively) are substantiated, and hence the spectrum of REEP1 mutations is complemented. Mutations in the REEP1 gene appear as the third most frequent cause in families with the 'pure' autosomal dominant form of HSP. Therefore mutation analysis in the REEP1 gene should be included in the comprehensive care for patients with the 'pure' autosomal dominant form of HSP.

Abbreviations

HSP: 

hereditary spastic paraplegia

REEP1: 

receptor expression enhancing protein 1

3'UTR: 

3'untranslated region

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

DHPLC: 

denaturating high-performance liquid chromatography

DEAZA: 

7-deaza-2'-deoxyguanosine

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulphoxide

RFLP: 

restriction fragment length polymorphism

MLPA: 

multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Natascha Wirkus.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University

References

  1. Depienne C, Stevanin G, Brice A, Durr A: Hereditary spastic paraplegias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007, 20 (6): 674-680.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sauter SM, Engel W, Neumann LM, Kunze J, Neesen J: Novel mutations in the Atlastin gene (SPG3A) in families with autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia and evidence for late onset forms of HSP linked to the SPG3A locus. Hum Mutat. 2004, 23 (1): 98-10.1002/humu.9205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beetz C, Nygren AO, Schickel J, Auer-Grumbach M, Burk K, Heide G, Kassubek J, Klimpe S, Klopstock T, Kreuz F, Otto S, Schule R, Schols L, Sperfeld AD, Witte OW, Deufel T: High frequency of partial SPAST deletions in autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neurology. 2006, 67 (11): 1926-1930. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244413.49258.f5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Depienne C, Fedirko E, Forlani S, Cazeneuve C, Ribai P, Feki I, Tallaksen C, Nguyen K, Stankoff B, Ruberg M, Stevanin G, Durr A, Brice A: Exon deletions of SPG4 are a frequent cause of hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Med Genet. 2007, 44 (4): 281-284. 10.1136/jmg.2006.046425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beetz C, Schule R, Deconinck T, Tran-Viet KN, Zhu H, Kremer BP, Frints SG, van Zelst-Stams WA, Byrne P, Otto S, Nygren AO, Baets J, Smets K, Ceulemans B, Dan B, Nagan N, Kassubek J, Klimpe S, Klopstock T, Stolze H, Smeets HJ, Schrander-Stumpel CT, Hutchinson M, Warrenburg BP, Braastad C, Deufel T, Pericak-Vance M, Schols L, Jonghe PD, Zuchner S: REEP1 mutation spectrum and genotype/phenotype correlation in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 31. Brain. 2008Google Scholar
  6. Zuchner S, Wang G, Tran-Viet KN, Nance MA, Gaskell PC, Vance JM, Ashley-Koch AE, Pericak-Vance MA: Mutations in the novel mitochondrial protein REEP1 cause hereditary spastic paraplegia type 31. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 79 (2): 365-369. 10.1086/505361.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16 (3): 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Donohoe E: Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography using the WAVE DNA fragment analysis system. Methods Mol Med. 2005, 108: 173-187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuklin A, Munson K, Gjerde D, Haefele R, Taylor P: Detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with the WAVE DNA fragment analysis system. Genet Test. 1997, 1 (3): 201-206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartegni L, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR: ESEfinder: A web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (13): 3568-3571. 10.1093/nar/gkg616. [http://rulai.cshl.edu/tools/ESE]View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D, Haussler D: Improved splice site detection in Genie. J Comput Biol. 1997, 4 (3): 311-323. [http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Xiao W, Oefner PJ: Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review. Hum Mutat. 2001, 17 (6): 439-474. 10.1002/humu.1130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/9/71/prepub

Copyright

© Schlang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement