We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Investigation of 89 candidate gene variants for effects on all-cause mortality following acute coronary syndrome
BMC Medical Geneticsvolume 9, Article number: 66 (2008)
Many candidate genes have been reported to be risk factors for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but their impact on clinical prognosis following ACS is unknown.
We examined the association of putative genetic risk factors with 3-year post-ACS mortality in 811 ACS survivors at university-affiliated hospitals in Kansas City, Missouri. Through a systematic literature search, we first identified genetic variants reported as susceptibility factors for atherosclerosis or ACS. Restricting our analysis to whites, so as to avoid confounding from racial admixture, we genotyped ACS cases for 89 genetic variants in 72 genes, and performed individual Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. We then performed Cox regression to create multivariate risk prediction models that further minimized potential confounding.
Of 89 variants tested, 16 were potentially associated with mortality (P < 0.1 for all), of which 6 were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with mortality following ACS. While these findings are not more than what would be expected by chance (P = 0.28), even after Bonferroni correction and adjustment for traditional cardiac risk factors, the IRS1 972Arg variant association (P = 0.001) retained borderline statistical significance (P < 0.1).
With the possible exception of IRS1, we conclude that multiple candidate genes were not associated with post-ACS mortality in our patient cohort. Because of power limitations, the 16 gene variants with P values < 0.1 may warrant further study. Our data do not support the hypothesis that the remaining 73 genes have substantial, clinically significant association with mortality after an ACS.
Despite convincing evidence of heritable susceptibility to acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), most common genetic variants have yet to be validated conclusively as ACS risk factors. [2–4] We recently reported an attempt to validate putative cardiac risk factors, all of which had been previously published in significant association with ACS or atherosclerosis, finding that only one pre-specified genetic risk genotype, homozygosity for the -455 A/G promoter variant in B-fibrinogen, could be replicated in our sample of 811 ACS cases and 650 controls. We concluded that our results did not support previous hypotheses generated by the candidate gene approach to ACS and that better study designs and unbiased screening approaches, such as whole genome association studies that have implicated 5 variants in the 9p21 region as ACS susceptibility factors,[6, 7] would be needed.
However, it is not yet known if candidate gene variants, including those in the 9p21 region, will affect prognosis following ACS. In theory, genes associated with the development of clinically significant atherosclerosis may also have a strong impact on subsequent prognosis after an ACS event has occurred. In particular, those who have already suffered ACS are at very high risk for suffering a subsequent fatal or nonfatal cardiac event, due not only to post-ACS physiological vulnerability, but also to the genetic and environmental risk factor profiles that led to the initial cardiac event. Against this backdrop of heightened risk, individual genetic effects may be markedly potentiated. With so many individuals currently surviving ACS events worldwide, there is an urgent need to identify improved methods for risk-stratifying patients' post-ACS prognosis so that more aggressive efforts at secondary prevention or intracardiac defibrillator insertion can be considered. Moreover, the identification of clinically important genetic risks for an adverse outcome after an ACS can also identify new targets for potential intervention. Despite the importance of such investigations, few studies have examined the association of potential atherogenic risk factors on prognosis after an ACS. To stimulate this line of research, we have performed a longitudinal follow-up study to investigate the impact of 89 candidate gene variants on mortality following ACS.
Our search strategy for putative risk variants, along with a list of references for each variant, has been described previously, and further details about each gene variant, including flanking DNA sequences, are available upon request from the authors. Reports were included if they contained a claim of a significant positive association, with an investigator-reported P value < 0.05. Medline search terms included: "gene, genetic, polymorphism, myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, and coronary artery disease." In addition to the gene variants contained in our initial report, we genotyped the 5 variants in the 9p21 region that have recently been implicated in the occurrence of myocardial infarction. Overall, we identified, and successfully genotyped, 89 variants in 72 genes (or gene regions, in the case of 9p21, given that a causative mechanism has not yet been identified).
Study population and genotyping
Eight hundred eleven self-reported white patients of European ancestry with ACS were identified from a consecutive series of patients presenting to two Kansas City, MO hospitals (Mid-America Heart Institute and Truman Medical Center), from March 2001 through June 2003. Standard definitions were used to diagnose ACS patients with either myocardial infarction or unstable angina.[8, 9] Individuals were monitored for incident deaths from any cause, as determined by periodic queries of the Social Security Administration Death Master File. A minimum of 3 years of follow-up was available.
Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight)[11, 12] system on whole genome amplified DNA.[13, 14] More extensive details of the cases and genotyping procedures have been recently described.
Initially, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for each variant (SAS 9.1, Research Triangle Park, NC). Cox regression models were then used to adjust positive associations for cardiac risk factors (age, sex, hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes), type of ACS (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA), and ACS treatments (aspirin and beta-blocker treatments provided in the first 24 hours, the use of angiography and revascularization, as well as quality of care indicators rendered at discharge (aspirin, beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor, and smoking cessation counseling)). We tested the proportional-hazards assumption for each covariate, by correlating the corresponding set of scaled Schoenfeld residuals with a suitable transformation of time based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival function. We applied the conservative Bonferroni correction in considering the overall statistical significance of results, but we also simply compared the total number of all positive associations at the P < 0.05 level to the expected number by chance, in 50,000 simulations (Resampling Stats, Inc., College Park, MD). An unexpected surplus of positive associations would imply that some of the tested polymorphisms may be truly associated with ACS.
Our sample had 93% power to detect an association, by the log rank test (P < 0.05), for a hazard ratio of 2.5 or higher, given a frequent genotype (0.5), and 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 3.3 or higher, given an infrequent genotype (0.1). For weak effects (1.1–1.5 hazard ratio), power was limited, ranging from 5% (0.1 genotype frequency, 1.1 hazard) to 29% (0.5 genotype frequency, 1.5 hazard). Given that such genetic variants with modest effects may not reach the conventional statistical significance level of P < 0.05, we sought to explore the possibility that null results might be related to lack of power (type II error), by examining the characteristics of the overall P value distribution. A Q-Q plot was performed, and supplemented with a simulation-based analysis. Random P values follow the Beta distribution. Hence, we subtracted random numbers between 0 and 1 (Beta distribution) from the observed P values, computed mean (observed-random) differences across all genetic variants, repeated this procedure 50,000 times, and plotted frequency histograms of the resulting 50,000 mean differences (Resampling Stats, Inc). In the presence of multiple bona fide genetic risk factors, but suboptimal power, the average mean P value difference (observed-random) would be less than zero. We initially included all P values from the individual Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests for all 89 genetic variants, and then sequentially removed those with the lowest P values until the remaining subset converged to a difference equal to zero, as would be expected for random variables showing no evidence of association with ACS.
The clinical characteristics of the 811 cases are described in Table 1. The population of ACS cases included 308 (38%) STEMI, 284 (35%) NSTEMI, and 219 (27%) UA patients. A family history of coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction among first degree relatives was found in over half of cases. In addition, cardiac risk factor profiles were typical of a population with ACS, with over one half of patients having hypercholesterolemia and hypertension, a third with a history of smoking, and over one fifth with diagnosed diabetes. Previous revascularization had been performed in over a third of the ACS cases.
There were 90 deaths in the cohort, which was followed for a median time of 42.3 months. Risk factor data used in the multivariable models were missing for 2 individuals. Those individuals who died, as compared to survivors, did not differ significantly in sex (P = 0.33) or ACS type (P = 0.22). However, there were marked differences in overall cardiac risk factor profiles, as expected, with deceased patients having relatively advanced age, as well as more extensive cardiovascular comorbidity such as congestive heart failure (Table 2).
A total of 89 variants in 72 genes were genotyped. The overall genotype call rate for these variants was 98.5% (range 95.0–99.8%). Tests of Hardy Weinberg equilibrium revealed that 6 variants violated HWE at the P < 0.05 level, which is not more than expected by chance (P = 0.29), given 89 chi-square tests (Table 2).
The genotype distributions, numbers of deaths by genotypic category, and unadjusted P values for all 89 genetic variables are shown in Table 3. Overall, there were 6 positive associations (P < 0.05). Despite their established association with ACS, none of the 9p21 variants was associated with prognosis. Likewise, the -455 A/G promoter variant in B-fibrinogen, which had been weakly associated with ACS occurrence in our study population, was not associated with post-ACS mortality (P = 0.1). However, the ACE1 I/I genotype was associated with a lower survival time (P = 0.04). In addition, the APOA1 -75G/A polymorphism was associated with mortality (early death of a single individual with the rare A/A genotype). Survival time was relatively decreased among the 16 individuals with the rare A/A (glutamine homozygous) genotype of the F7 Arg353Gln polymorphism (P = 0.01), with 5 deaths in this group. There was also excess mortality among heterozygotes for the HFE hemochromatosis-related allele (P = 0.04). In addition, individuals with the A/A genotype (lysine homozygotes) of the ICAM1 Lys469Glu missense mutation had an increased mortality risk (P = 0.01). Finally, the strongest statistical association with post-ACS mortality was observed in IRS1 arginine homozygotes, owing mainly to 2 early deaths among the 3 individuals with the rare A/A genotype in the Gly972Arg polymorphism; the deceased individuals were two males, aged 71 and 72 years, respectively, both of whom had extensive cardiac risk factor profiles. Heterozygotes had relatively low risk of death compared with homozygotes.
Of the 6 positive associations described above, 2 remained significant following Cox regression adjustment for traditional cardiac risk factors including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and ACS type, as well as treatment-related factors. Of these covariates, age (P < 0.0001), diabetes (P < 0.0001), and lack of revascularization (P < 0.01) had the most significant associations with mortality when modeled independent of genotype. The G allele of IRS1 was related to longer survival, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.08 (0.02, 0.84) for A/G, and 0.23 (0.05, 0.99) for G/G, respectively. In addition, the ICAM1 association remained significant, only for A/G heterozygotes (0.53; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.84), with the reference genotype being A/A.
In order to further explore the data for potential weak associations not quite meeting the P < 0.05 significance threshold due to suboptimal power, we performed a simulation analysis as described above, to supplement visual inspection of the Q-Q plot (Figure 1), which was not precisely linear. The mean difference that we observed was -0.065 for all 89 genetic variables (Figure 2), indicating that some P values were lower than expected by chance alone. In addition to the 6 associations described above, 10 additional genetic variants had P values of 0.1 or lower. Upon removal of these 16 positive associations (P < 0.1), the mean difference converged to zero in the remaining 73 genetic variables (Figure 2), suggesting no probable association with mortality.
Of the 89 genetic variants tested, we found strong statistical evidence of an association for only one, the IRS1 Gly972Arg polymorphism, although it was based upon a small number of deaths in individuals who would already have been considered at high risk for mortality. Thus, we can not unequivocally implicate any of the genetic variants included in this study as a prognostic factor following ACS, including those in the 9p21 region. The possible explanations for our essentially null findings include inadequate power for survival analysis, given that mortality following ACS occurred in only 11.1% of our case sample, or that the genetic variants included in our study have no impact on post-MI prognosis.
With respect to statistical power, we have presented evidence that at least 73 of the gene variants seemed identical to random variables, and therefore, our data provide no support for the hypothesis that testing these particular variants in larger samples would likely yield positive results. It is unlikely that mortality in direct relation to any of these gene variants is a common occurrence following ACS. Furthermore, as shown in Table 1, conventional cardiac risk factors such as advanced age and diabetes appear to be dominant factors in determining prognosis, and therefore, it may be challenging to demonstrate an independent genetic effect on mortality without sample sizes far in excess of 800 patients, particularly if genetic or pharmacogenetic interactions are explored.
However, given the limitations of our sample size, we were unable to exclude modest effects in association with the remaining 16 gene variants, 6 of which had nominally statistically significant associations with post-ACS mortality. Of these, only 2 remained significant after adjustment for traditional cardiac risk factors, with ACE1, APOA1, F7, and HFE having no independent association. As might have been expected, known confounding variables such as age, sex, and comorbidity proved to be important predictors of mortality in the Cox regression models. In addition, APOA1 was related to a small number of deaths, and the association of the I/I genotype of ACE1 would seem paradoxical, given that the D/D genotype has been postulated as a cardiac risk factor in most studies.
As with ACE1, the association of the F7 glutamine allele would also have to have been considered paradoxical, a priori, given that this allele was originally reported to be protective against the occurrence of myocardial infarction, and it correlates with lower F7 activity and hence lesser coagulability. However, it was the relatively rare A/A genotype of F7 that conferred the greatest risk of mortality in our population of ACS patients, which is consistent with the hypothesis that rare variants may have relatively large genetic effects. Interestingly, all 5 deceased individuals with the A/A genotype had NSTEMI, which is improbable (P = 0.005) given that only 35% of the cases had this manifestation of ACS, and 4 of 5 had either prior MI (N = 3) or a history of revascularization (N = 1). Thus, further study of the F7 allele is warranted, especially in NSTEMI patients.
In contrast, it is possible to postulate a plausible cardiovascular risk mechanism for the hemochromatosis-associated A allele. Heterozygotes for the A allele, on average, have relatively increased total body iron stores.[19, 20] In addition, some data indicate that iron excess may lead to free radical formation and thereby confer risk of myocardial infarction. However, a limitation of our study is a lack of phenotypic data on serum iron stores (e.g., ferritin or serum iron levels). In addition, the existing literature on HFE does not show a consistent association with cardiac disease, and the allele was not even marginally associated with the occurrence of ACS in our study population.
In judging the likely validity of the remaining 2 genetic associations that remained statistically significant despite extensive adjustment for comorbidity and treatment variables, one must consider the magnitude of the risk, the numbers of deaths observed, as well as the relationship of the genotypic risk pattern in the context of the functional biology of each particular gene.
The ICAM1 Lys469Glu association was related to relatively increased mortality (15.9%) among individuals with the A/A genotype (lysine homozygotes). This is higher than the overall 11.1% mortality rate in the cohort, and there were 43 deaths among individuals with this frequent (34.0%) genotypic class. However, it is the 469Glu allele that is postulated to have deleterious pro-inflammatory effects, and therefore, no biological mechanism for this association is immediately obvious.
The strongest genetic association was detected for the rare A allele (coding for arginine) of the IRS1 Gly972Arg polymorphism. Even a Bonferroni-corrected P value for this association had borderline (P < 0.1) study-wide significance. IRS1 is activated as an intracellular signal transducer, in adipocytes and skeletal muscle cells, when its tyrosine residues are phosphorylated by the insulin-bound insulin receptor, the function of which is inhibited in vitro by the Arg972 residue, leading to decreased glucose uptake.[24, 25] Baroni et al (1999) reported the A allele as a risk factor for coronary artery disease (18.9% vs. 6.8%), and there have been inconsistent reports of this polymorphism being more prevalent among diabetics,[26, 27] perhaps causing defective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interaction, peripheral insulin resistance, and impaired insulin secretion. In addition, Harrap et al reported a subthreshold linkage peak containing IRS1 in a genome-wide scan of 61 sibling pairs with acute coronary syndrome, adding to interest in the IRS1 locus as a cardiac candidate gene. However, IRS1 was not associated with the primary occurrence of ACS in our previous case-control analysis. Moreover, due to the rarity of arginine homozygous genotype, the association in our study population was largely based on the deaths of 2 individuals among the 3 with the A/A genotype. Accordingly, further prognostic study of this rare genotype is warranted in larger populations of ACS patients, particularly those with diabetes.
In 3 of the 6 nominally significant bivariate associations described above (ACE, F7, ICAM1), the allele hypothesized to be protective against ACS occurrence was associated with early death following ACS, creating an apparent paradox. These may be false positive associations. However, such apparently paradoxical, but well-validated, associations have been observed in prognostic studies (e.g., the association between active smoking and lower mortality following ACS). One theoretical explanation could be survivorship bias, meaning that most individuals with the genetic risk factor never survive the initial cardiac event, and that the remaining individuals are those with the best prognosis. Although potentially interesting, this hypothesis is difficult to investigate except prospectively, with ascertainment prior to the initial cardiac event.
In summary, our study has provided no uneqivocal support for the hypothesis that any of 89 genetic variants in 72 genetic loci contribute to death following ACS. However, in the context of multiple genetic comparisons, and necessarily modest numbers of deaths in a cohort of 811 individuals with ACS, it is challenging to interpret P values of borderline study-wide significance. Thus, we can not exclude relatively modest survival effects in the 16 gene variants with P < 0.1 (Table 3). Further study of these variants would be warranted, and meta-analysis would augment power to detect weak effects. In addition, given the recent success of the whole genome association approach in the identification of 9p21 and other promising cardiovascular candidate genes, it is plausible that this approach may have similar success in identifying genetic risk factors for prognosis following ACS.
Marenberg ME, Risch N, Berkman LF, Floderus B, de Faire U: Genetic susceptibility to death from coronary heart disease in a study of twins. The New England journal of medicine. 1994, 330 (15): 1041-1046. 10.1056/NEJM199404143301503.
Casas JPCJ, Miller GJ, Hingorani AD, Humphries SE: Investigating the genetic determinants of cardiovascular disease using candidate genes and meta-analysis of association studies. Ann Hum Genet. 2006, 70 (Pt 2): 145-169. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2005.00241.x.
Morgan TM, Coffey CS, Krumholz HM: Overestimation of genetic risks owing to small sample sizes in cardiovascular studies. Clin Genet. 2003, 64 (1): 7-17. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00088.x.
Ntzani EE, Rizos EC, Ioannidis JP: Genetic effects versus bias for candidate polymorphisms in myocardial infarction: case study and overview of large-scale evidence. American journal of epidemiology. 2007, 165 (9): 973-984. 10.1093/aje/kwk085.
Morgan TM, Krumholz HM, Lifton RP, Spertus JA: Nonvalidation of reported genetic risk factors for acute coronary syndrome in a large-scale replication study. Jama. 2007, 297 (14): 1551-1561. 10.1001/jama.297.14.1551.
Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, Gretarsdottir S, Blondal T, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Sigurdsson A, Baker A, Palsson A, et al: A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science. 2007, 316 (5830): 1491-1493. 10.1126/science.1142842.
McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, Stewart A, Roberts R, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Pennacchio LA, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Folsom AR, et al: A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007, 316 (5830): 1488-1491. 10.1126/science.1142447.
Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP: Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000, 36 (3): 959-969. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4.
Braunwald E: Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989, 80 (2): 410-414.
Schisterman EF, Whitcomb BW: Use of the Social Security Administration Death Master File for ascertainment of mortality status. Popul Health Metr. 2004, 2 (1): 2-10.1186/1478-7954-2-2.
Jurinke C, Oeth P, Boom van den D: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a versatile tool for high-performance DNA analysis. Mol Biotechnol. 2004, 26 (2): 147-164. 10.1385/MB:26:2:147.
Jurinke C, Boom van den D, Cantor CR, Koster H: The use of MassARRAY technology for high throughput genotyping. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2002, 77: 57-74.
Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, Wu X, Faruqi AF, Bray-Ward P, Sun Z, Zong Q, Du Y, Du J, et al: Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (8): 5261-5266. 10.1073/pnas.082089499.
Yan J, Feng J, Hosono S, Sommer SS: Assessment of multiple displacement amplification in molecular epidemiology. Biotechniques. 2004, 37 (1): 136-138.
Stephens M, Scheet P: Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 76 (3): 449-462. 10.1086/428594.
Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68 (4): 978-989. 10.1086/319501.
Perneger TV: What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Bmj. 1998, 316 (7139): 1236-1238.
Dupont WD, Plummer WD: Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Controlled clinical trials. 1998, 19 (6): 589-601. 10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00037-3.
Bulaj ZJ, Griffen LM, Jorde LB, Edwards CQ, Kushner JP: Clinical and biochemical abnormalities in people heterozygous for hemochromatosis. The New England journal of medicine. 1996, 335 (24): 1799-1805. 10.1056/NEJM199612123352403.
Powell LW, Jazwinska EC: Hemochromatosis in heterozygotes. The New England journal of medicine. 1996, 335 (24): 1837-1839. 10.1056/NEJM199612123352410.
Campbell S, George DK, Robb SD, Spooner R, McDonagh TA, Dargie HJ, Mills PR: The prevalence of haemochromatosis gene mutations in the West of Scotland and their relation to ischaemic heart disease. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2003, 89 (9): 1023-1026.
Little J, Bradley L, Bray MS, Clyne M, Dorman J, Ellsworth DL, Hanson J, Khoury M, Lau J, O'Brien TR, et al: Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations. American journal of epidemiology. 2002, 156 (4): 300-310.
Podgoreanu MV, White WD, Morris RW, Mathew JP, Stafford-Smith M, Welsby IJ, Grocott HP, Milano CA, Newman MF, Schwinn DA: Inflammatory gene polymorphisms and risk of postoperative myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2006, 114 (1 Suppl): I275-281.
Thirone AC, Huang C, Klip A: Tissue-specific roles of IRS proteins in insulin signaling and glucose transport. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM. 2006, 17 (2): 72-78. 10.1016/j.tem.2006.01.005.
Baroni MG, D'Andrea MP, Montali A, Pannitteri G, Barilla F, Campagna F, Mazzei E, Lovari S, Seccareccia F, Campa PP, et al: A common mutation of the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene is a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 1999, 19 (12): 2975-2980.
Jellema A, Zeegers MP, Feskens EJ, Dagnelie PC, Mensink RP: Gly972Arg variant in the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene and association with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 27 studies. Diabetologia. 2003, 46 (7): 990-995. 10.1007/s00125-003-1126-4.
van Dam RM, Hoebee B, Seidell JC, Schaap MM, Blaak EE, Feskens EJ: The insulin receptor substrate-1 Gly972Arg polymorphism is not associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in two population-based studies. Diabet Med. 2004, 21 (7): 752-758. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01229.x.
Harrap SB, Zammit KS, Wong ZY, Williams FM, Bahlo M, Tonkin AM, Anderson ST: Genome-wide linkage analysis of the acute coronary syndrome suggests a locus on chromosome 2. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2002, 22 (5): 874-878. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000016258.40568.F1.
Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, Barron HV, Krumholz HM: Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. The New England journal of medicine. 1999, 341 (4): 217-225. 10.1056/NEJM199907223410401.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/9/66/prepub
This project was funded by grants from the Saint Luke's Hospital Foundation, Kansas City, MO, by grant R-01 HS11282-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD and by grant P50 HL077113 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Morgan's research was supported by a Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Grant (NHLBI K23 HI77272), as well as the Children's Discovery Institute. These funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Dr. Morgan had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Dr. Krumholz discloses that he has research contracts with the Colorado Foundation for Medical Care and the American College of Cardiology, serves on the advisory boards for Amgen, Alere and United Healthcare, is a subject matter expert for VHA, Inc., and is Editor-in-Chief of Journal Watch Cardiology of the Massachusetts Medical Society. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
TMM performed genotyping and data analysis, and collaborated with JAS and HMK (who assembled the patient cohort) on study design and manuscript preparation. LX provided statistical analysis. PL and BK participated in genotyping, and genetic data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.