Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Subtle mutations in the SMN1 gene in Chinese patients with SMA: p.Arg288Met mutation causing SMN1 transcript exclusion of exon7



Proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common neuromuscular disorder resulting in death during childhood. Around 81 ~ 95% of SMA cases are a result of homozygous deletions of survival motor neuron gene 1 (SMN1) gene or gene conversions from SMN1 to SMN2. Less than 5% of cases showed rare subtle mutations in SMN1. Our aim was to identify subtle mutations in Chinese SMA patients carrying a single SMN1 copy.


We examined 14 patients from 13 unrelated families. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis was carried out to determine the copy numbers of SMN1 and SMN2. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and clone sequencing were used to detect subtle mutations in SMN1. SMN transcript levels were determined using quantitative RT-PCR.


Six subtle mutations (p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Glu134Lys, p.Leu228X, p.Ser230Leu, p.Tyr277Cys, and p.Arg288Met) were identified in 12 patients. The p.Tyr277Cys mutation has not been reported previously. The p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Leu228X, and p.Tyr277Cys mutations have only been reported in Chinese SMA patients and the first two mutations seem to be the common ones. Levels of full length SMN1 (fl-SMN1) transcripts were very low in patients carrying p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Leu228X or p.Arg288Met compared with healthy carriers. In patients carrying p.Glu134Lys or p.Ser230Leu, levels of fl-SMN1 transcripts were reduced but not significant. The SMN1 transcript almost skipped exon 7 entirely in patients with the p.Arg288Met mutation.


Our study reveals a distinct spectrum of subtle mutations in SMN1 of Chinese SMA patients from that of other ethnicities. The p.Arg288Met missense mutation possibly influences the correct splicing of exon 7 in SMN1. Mutation analysis of the SMN1 gene in Chinese patients may contribute to the identification of potential ethnic differences and enrich the SMN1 subtle mutation database.

Peer Review reports


Proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common infantile neuromuscular disease with an incidence of 1 in 6000 ~ 10,000 among newborns [1]. It is characterized by the destruction of alpha motor neurons in anterior horn cells of the spinal cord. This leads to progressive symmetrical limb and trunk muscle weakness, along with atrophy [2]. This disease can be categorized into four clinical types (SMA I–IV) based on age at onset and maximum attained motor functions [3].

The SMA-determining gene, survival motor neuron (SMN), is located at chromosome 5q11.2-13.3 [4], with two almost identical copies: telomeric SMN1 (MIM#600354; GenBank: NM_000344) and centromeric SMN2 (MIM#601627; GenBank: NM_022875). SMN1 and SMN2 sequences are highly homologous with only five nucleotide differences, one in intron 6, one in exon 7, two in intron 7, and one in exon 8 [4]. Although these differences do not alter the encoded amino acids, SMN1 produces mainly full-length SMN transcripts. However, 90% of the transcripts produced by SMN2 exclude exon 7 owing to a conversion (C→T) at position 840 in exon 7 [5]. Mutations in SMN1 result in the SMA phenotype, whereas SMN2 copy numbers determine the severity of SMA.

The majority of SMA patients have been found to have a homozygous deletion in exon 7 of SMN1. Some SMA cases are caused by compound mutations, with a SMN1 deletion on one allele and a subtle mutation on the other. Since the first several mutations were identified at 1995 by Lefebvre et al.[4] and Bussaglia et al. [6], More than 60 subtle mutations of SMN1 gene have been continuously identified worldwide [724]. Although mutations are distributed along the entire coding sequence of SMN1, the majority are located in exons 3 and 6 (47.5%). Tsai et al. reported the first subtle mutation in SMN1 of Chinese SMA patients in 2001 [18]. To date, eight subtle mutations have been successfully identified in Chinese SMA patients [1823]. In this article, our aim was to identify subtle mutations in SMN1 of Chinese SMA patients and detect the SMN1 transcript levels of these patients based on the quantitative RT-PCR.


Patients and materials

Fourteen SMA patients and their parents, from 13 unrelated families, were enrolled in this study. All patients met the diagnostic criteria of proximal SMA, with their clinical data provided in Table 1. Of these cases, three were diagnosed as type I SMA, nine were type II SMA, and two were type III SMA. Case 9 was the younger sister of case 8. Genomic DNA and total RNA from these individuals were isolated from peripheral venous blood using phenol-chloroform extraction and an RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Germany), respectively. Samples of the parents of cases 1 and 7 were not available. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Table 1 Genotype and phenotype in patients with a subtle mutation of SMN1 gene

Analysis of subtle mutations in SMN1

Cloning and sequencing of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplicons was carried out to analyze subtle mutations. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with 0.5 μg of total RNA, random primers, and M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Specific PCR primers (SMN575 [13] and 541C1120 [4]), were used to amplify the SMN gene (exons 1–8) using LA Taq polymerase (TAKARA, Japan) and cDNA template. Thermal cycling conditions involved an initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 50 s at 60°C, and 60 s at 72°C, with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplicons were subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy cloning vector (Promega, USA) according to the supplier’s protocol. SMN1and SMN2 subclones were differentiated using restriction enzymes (DraI and DdeI) [25]. Around 5 ~ 8 SMN1 and 2 ~ 3 SMN2 clones for each case were sequenced. Mutations were further confirmed by direct sequencing of the amplified products from SMN genomic DNA samples.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis

MLPA analysis was performed to detect copy numbers of SMN1 and SMN2 in all cases using a SALSA MLPA kit (P021-A1; MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. This SALSA kit contained 16 probes specific for the SMA critical region (5q12.2–q13.3). Among these, two specific probes for the C→T transition in exon 7 (C for SMN1 and T for SMN2) and two specific probes were for the G→A transition in exon 8 (G for SMN1 and A for SMN2) were included. In addition, the SALSA kit contained 21 control probes mapping to other autosomes. After MLPA treatment, products were run on the ABI 3730 automatic sequencing system (Applied Bio-Systems, USA). Four healthy individuals carrying two SMN1 copies were the normal controls, with eight carriers (parents of the patients with a homozygous SMN1 deletion) as the single copy SMN1 reference. For each sample, raw data [relative peak area (RPA)] were analyzed and compared with normal controls using Gene marker version 1.75 software. This software is able to calculate the RPA for each probe and to compare RPAs with those derived from normal controls. All samples were analyzed at least twice. A ratio with normal controls in the range 0.7–1.3 indicated a normal copy number (two copies), a ratio less than 0.7 indicated one copy, a ratio between 1.3–1.6 was indicative of three copies, and a ratio equal to 0 indicated zero copy.

Analysis of the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation

The allele-specific primer, Y277CR (5′-CTG AGT GAT TAC TTA CCA TAC-3), was designed to identify only the mutant allelic sequence, and was coupled with the upstream primer SMNE6F [12]. This was applied in an allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) to screen for the p.Tyr277Cys mutation in 150 control individuals. Simultaneously, alignment analysis of SMN proteins from six different species was performed using Clustal X version 1.8 to analyze levels of conservation for tyrosine 277.

Restriction endonuclease digestion of SMN transcripts

Total RNA (0.5 μg) was isolated from the peripheral blood of patients and controls, and used to synthesize first-strand cDNA as described earlier. The cDNAs were amplified using primers SMN575 [13] and 541C1120 [4] in a 50-μl reaction with a 60°C annealing temperature for 30 cycles as the section of “Analysis of subtle mutations in SMN1 ”described. In general, SMN transcripts yielded three products, full-length SMN1 (fl-SMN1, 1259 bp), full-length SMN2 (fl-SMN2, 1259 bp) and SMN2 isoform lacking exon 7 (Δ7-SMN2, 1205 bp). The SMN1 transcripts could be distinguished from SMN2 transcripts by digestion with the restriction enzyme DdeI. Following digestion, there was a 1259-bp fragment corresponding to fl-SMN1, a 1136-bp fragment corresponding to fl-SMN2, a 1082-bp fragment indicative of Δ7-SMN2 and a 123-bp fragment from SMN2. The transcripts and their products after DdeI digestion were separated on a 6% polyacrylamide gel at 500 volts for 2 h. Gels were stained with silver stain.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Three plasmids (fl-SMN1, fl-SMN2 and GAPDH) were constructed as external standards. Amplified SMN1 and SMN2 were obtained using normal control cDNA and primers SMN-F (5-GCT GAT GCT TTG GGA AGT ATG TTA-3) and SMN-R (5′-TCA ACT GCC TCA CCA CCG TGC TGG-3′), specific for exons 6 and 8, respectively. The primer pair for amplification of GAPDH was GAPDH_exst-F and GAPDH_exst-R, as previously described [26]. Amplicons for SMN1/SMN2 (395 bp) and GAPDH (133 bp) were cloned into the pGEM-T Easy cloning vector (Promega, USA). Cloned inserts were all verified by sequencing. Plasmid DNA was extracted and quantified by absorbance using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo, USA). Based on plasmid length and concentration, the copy number of each plasmid can be calculated. These plasmids were serially diluted across a range (103–108 copies) and used as external standards to construct the standard curve.

A qPCR assay to quantify SMN transcripts was conducted as described by Tiziano et al. [26]. The primers and MGB-probes were designed using Primer Express v1.5 software (Applied Biosystems, USA), with sequences provided in Table 2. The fl-SMN1 and fl-SMN2 transcripts were amplified using the same primer pair (SMN_mgb-F and SMN_mgb-R). Full-length transcripts of the two genes were distinguished by two different Taqman MGB probes on the basis of the C→T transition located in exon 7. For GAPDH, the primers (GAPDH_abs-F and GAPDH_abs-R) and MGB probe sequence were the same as those described in Tiziano et al.[26] described. All reactions (20 μl) were carried out using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) and contained 2× GoldStar TaqMan Mixture (KANGWEI, China), 20 ng of cDNA, 0.4 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), and 4 pmol of the SMN1, SMN2 or GAPDH probe. The thermal cycling conditions involved 2 min at 50°C then 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. Each sample was assayed in duplicate and repeated at least twice. Evaluation of data was performed using 7500 Software SDS version 1.4.

Table 2 Information of Primers and Probes Used for qRT-PCR

Statistical analysis

Transcript levels for fl-SMN1, fl-SMN2 and GAPDH were expressed as copies per nanogram of total RNA. Expression levels of fl-SMN1, fl-SMN2, and fl-SMN were normalized to GAPDH. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 19.0. A parametric test (t-test) was used to compare the transcript levels between normal controls and carriers, as well as between carriers and patients. Correlation between SMN2 gene copy numbers and fl-SMN2 transcript levels were analyzed by a gerneral linear model(one-way ANOVA). A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.


SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers

The numbers of SMN1 and SMN2 copies in the 14 patients analyzed by MLPA are presented in Table 1. All patients carried only one copy of SMN1. Patients 3, 7, 11, 12, and 14 carried three copies of SMN2. The remaining patients had two copies of SMN2.

SMN1 subtle mutation

Six subtle mutations were identified in the present study (Table 1). Five mutations (p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Leu228X, p.Ser230Leu, p.Glu134Lys, and p.Arg288Met) were detected in more than one patient. A novel mutation (p.Tyr277Cys) located in exon 6 of SMN1 was identified for the first time (Figure 1A). The p.Arg288Met mutation has been previously described [22]. No subtle mutations were detected in two of the patients carrying one copy of SMN1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Analysis of the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation. (A) Sequencing map of the p.Tyr277Cys (TAT > TGT) mutation. Underlined bases indicate codons affected by subtle mutations. Black arrows indicate the converted base peak. (B) AS-PCR screening results for the p.Tyr277Cys mutation in normal controls. M, DNA marker; P, case 10; Fa and Ma are the father and mother of case 10, respectively; N1–6 are normal controls. Case 10 and his mother carrying the p.Tyr277Cys mutation showed two products, a 251-bp fragment corresponding to the internal control and a 182-bp fragment corresponding to p.Tyr277Cys. (C) Alignment of the SMN protein. * indicates highly conserved amino acids. The colon (:) is an indicator of conserved amino acids. The period (.) indicates amino acids that are not conserved. P.Glu134 and p.Tyr277 located in the Tudor domain and Y/G box, respectively, are highly conserved.

Screening for the p.Tyr277Cys mutation

AS-PCR was performed to screen for the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation in control individuals (Figure 1B). This mutation was not observed in the 150 control individuals. Sequence alignment of six different species showed that the Tyr277 residue was highly conserved (Figure 1C).

SMNtranscripts analysis of patients with subtle mutations

A DdeI digest of SMN transcripts assay was carried out to qualitative analysis the SMN transcript in all the patients with subtle mutations. Following DdeI digestion, three obvious products (fl-SMN1, fl-SMN2 and Δ7-SMN2) were detected, without obviously truncated or prolonged transcripts in most patients (Figure 2). While in patients carrying the p.Arg288Met mutation, the fl-SMN1 transcript (1259 bp) was rare, but the undigested Δ7-SMN1 fragment (1205 bp) was more prominent (Figure 2). An undigested Δ7-SMN1 fragment was also observed in their father with the p.Arg288Met mutation.

Figure 2
figure 2

Dde I digestion of SMN transcripts. M: DNA marker; lane 1: normal controls carrying two SMN1 and two SMN2 copies; 2: case 2 carrying the p.Ser8LysfsX23 mutation; 3: case 4 carrying the p.Glu134Lys mutation; 4: case 6 carrying the p.Leu228X mutation; 5: case 8 carrying the p.Ser230Leu mutation; 6: case 10 carrying the p.Tyr277Cys mutation; 7 and 8: patient 12 and her father carrying the p.Arg288Met mutation; 9: the carrier with one copy of the SMN1 gene. Transcripts for fl-SMN1, fl-SMN2 and Δ7-SMN2 were separated using 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis following digestion with DdeI. In patient 11 carrying the p.Arg288Met mutation (line 7), the fl-SMN1 transcript (1259 bp) almost disappeared, but the undigested 7-SMN1 fragment (1205 bp) was more prominent. This was also observed in the patient’s father (line 8).

Clone sequencing of the patients with p.Arg288Met mutation

The SMN cDNA (from exon 1 to exon 8) of patients with p.Arg288Met were amplified and subclone to the pGEM-T vector. After screening the SMN1 clones and sequencing, we found that all 5 subclones of SMN1 from these patients had lost the entire sequence of exon 7 (Figure 3), while three full-length SMN clones belong to the sequences of SMN2. This result was consistent to the result of DdeI digest of SMN transcripts assay. The p.Arg288Met mutation produces a transcript of Δ7-SMN1 other than the transcript of fl-SMN1, it implies that it might cause the skip of exon 7 of SMN1 gene.

Figure 3
figure 3

Partial reverse-sequencing map of SMN1 clones for the patient with the p.Arg288Met mutation. (A) Antisense sequencing map of SMN1 clones. The C base (G in the sense sequence) is indicated by the black arrow, which is specific for SMN1 on exon 8. The red arrow indicates the position of the entire exon 7 sequence that was deleted in the SMN1 clone. (B) Antisense sequencing map of a normal individual. The G base (C in the sense sequence) is indicated by the black arrow and is specific for SMN1 on exon 7. The intact sequence of exon 7 can be seen between exons 6 and 8.

Comparison of fl-SMN1transcripts

To evaluate the effect of subtle mutations on fl-SMN1 levels, we compared fl-SMN1 levels in patients with that of normal controls, and with healthy carriers (Table 3 and Figure 4). The fl-SMN1 levels in normal controls and healthy carriers were 23.77 ± 7.74 and 9.47 ± 5.39, respectively. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (t = 5.296, P = 0.000). The fl-SMN1 transcript levels in all patients were significantly decreased compared with normal controls (t = 7.839, P = 0.000). Compared with healthy carriers carrying one copy of SMN1, patients with the p.Glu134Lys or p.Ser230Leu mutation showed no significant difference (t = 1.769, P = 0.094 and t = 1.660, P = 0.115, respectively), patients with the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation presented a slight decrease in fl-SMN1 transcript levels (t = 2.337, P = 0.032), while the patients with the p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Leu228X, and p.Arg288Met mutations were significantly reduced (t test, P = 0.000). Especially for the patients carrying p.Arg288Met, fl-SMN1 transcript levels were almost undetectable (0.017 ± 0.15).

Table 3 Fl- SMN1 transcript levels of controls ,carrier , and patients with SMN1 subtle mutations
Figure 4
figure 4

Levels of fl- SMN1 transcripts in controls, carriers and patients with subtle mutations. The dark horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. The empty circle indicate the median. Fl-SMN1 transcript levels were significantly different between normal controls and healthy carriers. The levels of transcripts in patients were significantly reduced compared with those in controls. Fl-SMN1 transcript levels in patients with the p.Arg288Met mutation were almost undetectable. In patients with p.Ser8LysfsX23 or p.Leu228X mutations, transcript levels were severely reduced. In the patient carrying the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation, transcript levels were decreased, while patients with missense mutations (p.Ser230Leu and p.Glu134Lys) showed no significantly decrease compared with carriers.

Transcript levels of fl-SMNin different clinical cases

Although there was no correlation between fl-SMN2 transcript level and SMN2 copy numbers (one-way ANOVA, F = 0.391, P = 0.679) in normal controls and healthy carriers, the fl-SMN2 transcript level was increased along with SMN2 copy numbers (Figure 5). The fl-SMN2 transcript levels in patients are presented in Table 1, with no significant differences (F = 1.029, P = 0.430). Total fl-SMN transcript levels (fl-SMN1 + fl-SMN2) were used to assess the correlation between the fl-SMN levels and the clinical severity. The fl-SMN transcript levels in normal controls and healthy carriers were 34.4 ± 7.1 and 21.7 ± 12.7, respectively, with a significant difference (t = 2.596, P = 0.017). The fl-SMN transcript levels in all patients were significantly decreased compared with normal controls (t = 7.060, P = 0.000). Mean fl-SMN transcript levels in type I (n = 2) and type II (n = 8) were 11.27 ± 6.8 and 11.67 ± 6.34, respectively. For type III (n = 2) patients, a slight increase in levels could be observed (20.00 ± 9.43). Because the number of types I and III patients were low, statistical analysis of fl-SMN transcript levels was only carried out between type II patients and healthy carriers, with a significant difference observed (t = 3.046, P = 0.009).

Figure 5
figure 5

fl- SMN2 transcript levels among the individuals with different SMN2 copy numbers. Mean fl-SMN2 transcript levels in healthy individuals (normal controls and healthy carriers) with a single copy of SMN2 were 6.3895 ± 1.56, 11.48 ± 8.01 for those with two copies of SMN2, and 15.61 ± 11.39 for patients with three SMN2 copies. No correlation was observed between fl-SMN2 transcript level and SMN2 copy numbers (F = 0.391, P = 0.679).


Including the results from this study, 61 SMN1 subtle mutations have been detected among diverse populations worldwide. Nine subtle mutations have been identified in Chinese SMA patients [1823] (Table 4). Among these, the c.1-39A > G, p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Ser28Ser, p.Leu228X, p.Tyr277Cys, and c.835-1 G > A mutations were only found in Chinese SMA patients, p.Arg288Met mutation had been reported in another East Asian country-Korea [17], only the two mutation (p.Glu134Lys [27], and p.Ser230Leu [28]) were found in Caucasian population. In East Asian country, there was still another mutation p.Trp92Ser only reported in Japanese SMA patient [15]. These reports showed the kinds of SMN1subtle mutation in the Chinese even East Asian population are distinct from those in Caucasian populations. In addition, the type of common mutations differed between Chinese and Caucasian populations. In Chinese SMA patients, p.Ser8LysfsX23 and p.Leu228X seem to be the common mutations, which were detected in seven families (33.3%, 7/21) and four families (19.0%, 4/21), respectively. While in Caucasian populations, Mutations p.Arg133fsX15, p.Gly261LeufsX8, p.Tyr272Cys and p.Thr274Ile were commonly detected [4, 68, 10, 11, 16, 25, 2931]. Our research implies that the SMN1 subtle mutations show high heterogeneity in various populations.

Table 4 Subtle mutations of SMN1 gene identified in Chinese SMA patients

Our results show that the level of fl-SMN1 transcripts in normal controls was significantly higher than in healthy carriers, which corresponded to the different number of SMN1 copies carried in these individuals. Although the patients with subtle mutation carried only one SMN1 copy, the effect of these mutations on the fl-SMN1 transcript levels were different. Based on the qPCR analysis, fl-SMN1 transcript levels in patients with p.Ser8LysfsX23 or p.Leu228X mutations were much lower than in healthy carriers. We presumed the reason for this might be that these two premature termination mutations initiate nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). NMD procedure can result in rapid degradation of SMN1 mRNA [32]. A lack of any significant difference between carriers and patients with missense mutations (p.Glu134Lys and p.Ser230Leu) implied that these missense mutations do not affect transcription of SMN1, or degradation of SMN1 mRNA. However, all the patients with subtle mutations significantly reduced fl-SMN transcript levels compared with normal controls. These results were similar to those seen in patients with a homozygous deletion of SMN1[26]. We have attempted to assess the correlation between the fl-SMN levels and the clinical severity, while the difference of fl-SMN transcript levels in these patients were not significant. A direct relationship could not be observed between fl-SMN transcript levels and phenotypic severity in this study.

The p.Arg288Met mutation was firstly reported in 2009 [17], and was also found in two unrelated Chinese patients in a previous study [23]. Kang et al. predicted that this mutation was likely to be deleterious to protein structure and function [17]. In our study, an interesting finding was that the SMN1 transcript carrying the p.Arg288Met mutation skipped exon 7 entirely. According to sequence analysis and restriction digestion assays, these two patients with p.Arg288Met mutation produce a transcript corresponding to Δ7-SMN1 other than a transcript of fl-SMN1. Subsequent qPCR analysis verified that fl-SMN1 transcripts were almost undetectable (0.017 ± 0.15). The effect of this mutation was similar to that seen with the C to T conversion in SMN2 exon 7 producing Δ7-SMN mRNA. This transcript encodes a truncated SMN protein that fails to undergo self-oligomerization of SMN, is unstable, and degrades easily. The pathogenic effect in a patient who has only one copy of SMN1 with the p.Arg288Met mutation is the same as for the homozygous deletion of SMN1. The phenotypes in patients carrying the p.Arg288Met mutation were type I SMA in the two patients and type II SMA in another patient. These results were consistent with a phenotype in SMA patients that have a homozygous deletion of SMN1.

Rare missense mutations were reported to affect the splicing of SMN1. There were two variations that occurred in exon 7 of SMN2 that were described to affect the splicing of SMN2. The C→T conversion at position six of SMN2 exon 7 was found to cause the entire exon to be skipped [33, 34]. The missense mutation p.Gly287Arg (c.859 G > C) in SMN2, recently described as a positive disease modifier, could improve SMN2 exon 7 inclusion [35]. Many studies have revealed that multiple cis-elements and splicing factors participate in the regulation of SMN exon 7 splicing. Singh et al.[36] showed that the Conserved tract is a positive element located in the middle of exon 7 at positions 16–44. Hofmann et al.[37] revealed binding of exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) with Htra2-b1 in the middle of exon 7 at positions 19–27. In this study, our results show that the p.Arg288Met mutation may influence splicing of exon 7, causing the entire exon to be skipped. Serine/arginine-rich protein-binding ESE elements were not observed in wild-type or mutant sequences at c.863 using ESE finder 2.0 ( However, the p.Arg288Met mutation at position 29 of exon 7 was located within the Conserved tract element, and near where the ESE binds with Htra2-b1. We speculate that an unascertained ESE, regulating SMN exon 7 splicing, might exist in the Conserved tract element and that this variant of G > T in c.863 may influence the ESE site or produce a new exonic splicing silencer element (ESS).

The tyrosine/glycine-rich sequence (Y/G box), containing highly conserved residues Tyr268 and Gly279 (YXXGYXXGYXXG) in the C-terminus of SMN, is an essential self-oligomerization domain of SMN. It plays role in assembling of the SMN complex and participating in pre-mRNA splicing [38, 39]. The aromatic amino acids Tyr268, Tyr272, and Tyr276, each at three-base intervals, seem to be more important than other amino acids in the Y/G box because two SMN monomers might form a stable dimer through aromatic stacking of these tyrosines [16]. When these three tyrosines mutate, SMN self-oligomerization could be severely disturbed. To date, several missense mutations in the Y/G box, including p.Tyr272Cys, p.His273Arg, p.Thr274Ile, p.Gly275Ser, p.Gly279Cys and p.Gly279Val, have been reported [4, 7, 1014, 16, 4044]. Among these, p.Tyr272Cys and p.Gly279Val were reported to be usually associated with the more severe type I form of SMA [4, 1113, 44]. The p.Thr274Ile, p.Gly275Ser and p.Gly279Cys mutations were generally associated with the milder, type II and III phenotypes [7, 1013, 16, 4143].

In this paper, the p.Tyr277Cys mutation within the Y/G box is reported for the first time. Although Tyr277 is an aromatic amino acid, it is near the critical Tyr276 residue. Both Tyr276 residues from two SMN monomers require adequate space to form aromatic stacking. We speculate that Tyr277 replaced by a Cys residue might disturb the space structure of aromatic stacking, thereby affecting the stability of the SMN dimer. The patient carrying the p.Tyr277Cys mutation also had two copies of SMN2. The mean fl-SMN transcript level in this patient was 6.54 ± 4.33, which was much lower than that in normal controls (34.4 ± 7.1) and healthy carriers (21.7 ± 12.7). The phenotype of this patient in our study was indicative of type II SMA. Although Tyr277 is a highly conserved residue, we predicted that the p.Tyr277Cys mutation might be a milder mutation affecting the structure of the Y/G box.

It was worth to note that two siblings (cases 8 and 9) with the same p.Ser230Leu mutation displayed different phenotypes. The elder brother was diagnosed as type II SMA, while his younger sister was type III SMA. Cases 8 and 9 carried two SMN2 copies, with mean fl-SMN transcript levels of 12.22 ± 7.07 and 14.83 ± 4.45, respectively. The difference between them was not significant (t = −0.453, P = 0.682). We hypothesized that there might be other modifying factors that affect phenotypes, such as Plastin 3, which has been reported as a sex-specific protective modifier of SMA [4547].


In conclusion, six SMN1 subtle mutations were identified in 12 patients, including the novel p.Tyr277Cys mutation. Based on our research and other studies, p.Ser8LysfsX23 and p.Leu228X mutations seem to be the common SMN1 subtle mutations in Chinese patients. This preliminary study revealed that SMN1 subtle mutations in Chinese SMA were different to those observed in Caucasian populations. A qRT-PCR assay implied that p.Ser8LysfsX23, p.Leu228X, and p.Arg288Met mutations affected fl-SMN1 transcript levels. Besides, we discovered that the p.Arg288Met mutation disturbed the splicing of exon7 SMN1 pre-mRNA, resulting in SMN1 transcripts skipping exon 7.


  1. Pearn J: Incidence, prevalence, and gene frequency studies of chronic childhood spinal muscular atrophy. J Med Genet. 1978, 15: 409-413. 10.1136/jmg.15.6.409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogino S, Wilson RB, Gold B: New insights on the evolution of the SMN1 and SMN2 region: simulation and meta-analysis for allele and haplotype frequency calculations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004, 12: 1015-1023. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zerrres K, Davies KE: 59th ENMC International Workshop: Spinal Muscular Atrophies: recent progress and revised diagnostic criteria 17–19 April 1998, Soestduinen, The Netherlands. Neuromusc Disord. 1999, 9: 272-278. 10.1016/S0960-8966(99)00016-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, Benichou B, Cruaud C, Millasseau P, Zeviani M, Paslier DL, Frezal J, Cohen D, Weissenbach J, Munnich A, Melki J: Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995, 80: 155-165. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorson CL, Androphy EJ: An exonic enhancer is required for inclusion of an essential exon in the SMA-determining gene SMN. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9: 259-265. 10.1093/hmg/9.2.259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bussaglia E, Clermont O, Tizzano E, Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Cruaud C, Urtizberea JA, Colomer J, Munnich A, Baiget M, Melki J: A frame-shift deletion in the survival motor neuron gene in Spanish spinal muscular atrophy patients. Nat Genet. 1995, 11: 335-337. 10.1038/ng1195-335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hahnen E, Schönling J, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Raschke H, Zerres K, Wirth B: Missense mutations in exon 6 of the survival motor neuron gene in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6: 821-825. 10.1093/hmg/6.5.821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons DW, McAndrew PE, Monani UR, Mendell JR, Burghes AHM, Prior TW: An 11 base pair duplication in exon 6 of the SMN gene produces a type I spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) phenotype: further evidence for the SMN as the primary SMA-determining gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5: 1727-1732. 10.1093/hmg/5.11.1727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brahe C, Clermont O, Zappata S, Tiziano F, Melki J, Neri G: Frameshift mutation in the survival motor neuron gene in a severe case of SMA type I. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5: 1971-1976. 10.1093/hmg/5.12.1971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons DW, McAndrews PE, Iannaccone ST, Mendell JR, Burghes AH, Prior TW: Intragenic telSMN mutations: frequency, distribution, evidence of a founder effect, and modification of the spinal muscular atrophy phenotype by cenSMN copy number. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 1712-1723. 10.1086/302160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wirth B, Herz M, Wetter A, Moskau S, Hahnen E, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Wienker T, Zerres K: Quantitative analysis of survival motor neuron copies: identification of subtle SMN1 mutations in patients with spinal muscular atrophy, genotype-phenotype correlation, and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 6: 1340-1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clermont O, Burlet P, Benit P, Chanterau D, Saugier-Veber P, Munnich A, Cusin V: Molecular analysis of SMA patients without homozygous SMN1 deletions using a new strategy for identification of SMN1 subtle mutations. Hum Mutat. 2004, 24: 417-427. 10.1002/humu.20092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Y, Grimmler M, Schwarzer V, Schoenen F, Fischer U, Wirth B: Molecular and Functional Analysis of Intragenic SMN1 Mutations in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Hum Mutat. 2005, 25: 64-71. 10.1002/humu.20111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zapletalová E, Hedvicáková P, Kozák L, Vondrácek P, Gaillyová R, Maríková T, Kalina Z, Jüttnerová V, Fajkus J, Fajkusová L: Analysis of point mutations in the SMN1 gene in SMA patients bearing a single SMN1 copy. Neuromuscul Disor. 2007, 17: 476-481. 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotani T, Sutomo R, Sasongko TH, Sadewa AH, Gunadi , Minato T, Fujii E, Endo S, Lee MJ, Ayaki H, Harada Y, Matsuo M, Nishio H: A novel mutation at the N-terminal of SMN Tudor domain inhibits its interaction with target proteins. J Neurol. 2007, 254: 624-630. 10.1007/s00415-006-0410-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alías L, Bernal S, Fuentes-Prior P, Barceló MJ, Also E, Martínez-Hernández R, Rodríguez-Alvarez FJ, Martín Y, Aller E, Grau E, Peciña A, Antiñolo G, Galán E, Rosa AL, Fernández-Burriel M, Borrego S, Millán JM, Hernández-Chico C, Baiget M, Tizzano EF: Mutation update of spinal muscular atrophy in Spain: molecular characterization of 745 unrelated patients and identification of four novel mutations in the SMN1 gene. Hum Genet. 2009, 125: 29-39. 10.1007/s00439-008-0598-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang SH, Cho SI, Chae JH, Chung KN, Ra EK, Kim SY, Seong MW, Kim JY, Park SS: False homozygous deletions of SMN1 exon 7 using DraI PCR-RFLP caused by a novel mutation in spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009, 13: 511-513. 10.1089/gtmb.2008.0158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai CH, Jong YJ, Hu CJ, Chen CM, Shih MC, Chang CP, Chang JG: Molecular analysis of SMN, NAIP and P44 genes of SMA patients and their families. J Neurol Sci. 2001, 190: 35-40. 10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00574-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng J, Lin YH, Yan AZ, Cai MY, Ke LF, Lan FH: Mutation analysis of SMN gene in a patient and his family with spinal muscular atrophy. Chin J Med Genet (Chin). 2009, 26: 139-143.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheng-Yuan Z, Xiong F, Chen YJ, Yan TZ, Zeng J, Li L, Zhang YN, Chen WQ, Bao XH, Zhang C, Xu XM: Molecular characterization of SMN copy number derived from carrier screening and from core families with SMA in a Chinese population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010, 18: 978-984. 10.1038/ejhg.2010.54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang CC, Chang JG, Chen YL, Jong YJ, Wu SM: Multi-exon genotyping of SMN gene in spinal muscular atrophy by universal fluorescent PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2010, 31: 2396-2404. 10.1002/elps.201000124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Qu YJ, Song F, Yang YL, Jin YW, Bai JL: Compound heterozygous mutation in two unrelated cases of Chinese spinal muscular atrophy patients. Chin Med J. 2011, 134: 385-389.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng J, Lin Y, Yan A, Ke L, Zhu Z, Lan F: Establishment of a molecular diagnostic system for spinal muscular atrophy experience from a clinical laboratory in China. J Mol Diag. 2011, 13: 41-47. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.11.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vezain M, Gérard B, Drunat S, Funalot B, Fehrenbach S, N’guyen-Viet V, Vallat JM, Frébourg T, Tosi M, Martins A, Saugier-Veber P: A leaky splicing mutation affecting SMN1 exon 7 inclusion explains an unexpected mild case of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mutat. 2011, 32: 989-994. 10.1002/humu.21528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Steege G, Grootscholten PM, van der Vlies P, Draaijers TG, Osinga J, Cobben JM, Scheffer H, Buys CH: PCR-based DNA test to confirm clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 1995, 345: 985-986. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90732-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tiziano FD, Pinto AM, Fiori S, Lomastro R, Messina S, Bruno C, Pini A, Pane M, D’Amico A, Ghezzo A, Bertini E, Mercuri E, Neri G, Brahe C: SMN transcript levels in leukocytes of SMA patients determined by absolute real-time PCR. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010, 18 (1): 52-58. 10.1038/ejhg.2009.116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Clermont O, Burlet P, Cruaud C, Bertrandy S, Melki J, Munnich A, Lefebvre S: Mutation analysis of the SMN gene in undeleted SMA patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 61: A329-10.1086/514847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nölle A, Zeug A, van Bergeijk J, Tönges L, Gerhard R, Brinkmann H, Al Rayes S, Hensel N, Schill Y, Apkhazava D, Jablonka S, O’mer J, Srivastav RK, Baasner A, Lingor P, Wirth B, Ponimaskin E, Niedenthal R, Grothe C, Claus P: The spinal muscular atrophy disease protein SMN is linked to the rho-kinase pathway via profilin. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20 (24): 4865-4878. 10.1093/hmg/ddr425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martín Y, Valero A, del Castillo E, Pascual SI, Hernández-Chico C: Genetic study of SMA patients without homozygous SMN1 deletions: identification of compound heterozygotes and characterisation of novel intragenic SMN1 mutations. Hum Genet. 2002, 110: 257-263. 10.1007/s00439-002-0681-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuscó I, López E, Soler-Botija C, Barceló MJ, Baiget M, Tizzano EF: A genetic and phenotypic analysis in Spanish spinal muscular atrophy patients with c.399_402del AGAG, the most frequently found subtle mutation in the SMN1 gene. Hum Mutat. 2003, 22: 136-143. 10.1002/humu.10245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Parsons DW, McAndrew PE, Allinson PS, Parker WD, Burghes AH, Prior TW: Diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy in an SMN non-deletion patient using a quantitative PCR screen and mutation analysis. J Med Genet. 1998, 35: 674-676. 10.1136/jmg.35.8.674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Brichta L, Garbes L, Jedrzejowska M, Grellscheid SN, Holker I, Zimmermann K, Wirth B: Nonsense-mediated messenger RNA decay of survival motor neuron 1 causes spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Genet. 2008, 123: 141-153. 10.1007/s00439-007-0455-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cartegni L, Hastings ML, Calarco JA, de Stanchina E, Krainer AR: Determinants of exon 7 splicing in the spinal muscular atrophy genes, SMN1 and SMN2. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78: 63-77. 10.1086/498853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kashima T, Manley JL: A negative element in SMN2 exon 7 inhibits splicing in spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Genet. 2003, 34: 460-463. 10.1038/ng1207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vezain M, Saugier-Veber P, Goina E, Touraine R, Manel V, Toutain A, Fehrenbach S, Frébourg T, Pagani F, Tosi M, Martins A: A rare SMN2 variant in a previously unrecognized composite splicing regulatory element induces exon 7 inclusion and reduces the clinical severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mutat. 2010, 31: E1110-E1125. 10.1002/humu.21173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh NN, Androphy EJ, Singh RN: In vivo selection reveals combinatorial controls that define a critical exon in the spinal muscular atrophy genes. RNA. 2004, 10: 1291-1305. 10.1261/rna.7580704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hofmann Y, Lorson CL, Stamm S, Androphy EJ, Wirth B: Htra2-beta 1 stimulates an exonic splicing enhancer and can restore full-length SMN expression to survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 9618-9623. 10.1073/pnas.160181697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lorson CL, Strasswimmer J, Yao JM, Baleja JD, Hahnen E, Wirth B, Le T, Burghes AH, Androphy EJ: SMN oligomerization defect correlates with spinal muscular atrophy severity. Nat Genet. 1998, 19: 63-66. 10.1038/ng0598-63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Dreyfuss G: Characterization of functional domains of the SMN protein in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 45387-45393. 10.1074/jbc.M105059200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Prior TW: Spinal muscular atrophy diagnostics. J Child Neurol. 2007, 22: 952-956. 10.1177/0883073807305668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bürglen L, Patel S, Dubowitz V, Melki J, Muntoni F: A novel point mutation in the SMN gene in a patient with type III spinal muscular atrophy. In: First Congress of the World Muscle Society. 1996, Elsevier, Amsterdam, S39-

    Google Scholar 

  42. Skordis LA, Dunckley MG, Burglen L, Campbell L, Talbot K, Patel S, Melki J, Davies KE, Dubowitz V, Muntoni F: Characterization of novel point mutations in the survival motor neuron gene SMN, in three patients with SMA. Hum Genet. 2001, 108: 356-357. 10.1007/s004390100497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Talbot K, Ponting CP, Theodosiou AM, Rodrigues NR, Surtees R, Mountford R, Davies KE: Missense mutation clustering in the survival motor neuron gene: a role for a conserved tyrosine and glycine rich region of the protein in RNA metabolism?. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6: 497-500. 10.1093/hmg/6.3.497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang CH, Papendick BD, Bruinsma P, Day JK: Identification of a novel missense mutation of the SMN (T) gene in two siblings with spinal muscular atrophy. Neurogenetics. 1998, 1: 273-276. 10.1007/s100480050040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Oprea GE, Kröber S, McWhorter ML, Rossoll W, Müller S, Krawczak M, Bassell GJ, Beattie CE, Wirth B: Plastin 3 Is a Protective Modifier of Autosomal Recessive Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Science. 2008, 320: 524-527. 10.1126/science.1155085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Stratigopoulos G, Lanzano P, Deng L, Guo J, Kaufmann P, Darras B, Finkel R, Tawil R, McDermott MP, Martens W, Devivo DC, Chung WK: Association of plastin 3 expression with disease severity in spinal muscular atrophy only in postpubertal females. Arch Neurol. 2010, 67: 1252-1256. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bernal S, Also-Rallo E, Martínez-Hernández R, Alías L, Rodríguez-Alvarez FJ, Millán JM, Hernández-Chico C, Baiget M, Tizzano EF: Plastin 3 expression in discordant spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) siblings. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011, 21: 413-419. 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


We are grateful to the patients and their families for their participation and cooperation in providing blood samples and information. We greatly acknowledge Professors Wang Li-wen (Children’s Hospital Affiliated Capital Institute of Pediatrics), Xiong Hui and Yang Yan-ling (First Hospital of Peking University), and Zou Li-ping (PLA General Hospital) for their clinical support. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 81050034 and 81100933), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipal (Project No. 7112020),the Capital Health Research and Development of Special(Project No. 2011-1008-03) and the Science Foundation of the Capital of Institute of Pediatrics (Project No. 11-A05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Fang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential competing interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Authors’ contributions

SF conceived of, designed and organized the study, contributed to obtaining the funding, and helped to critically revise the manuscript. QY contributed to obtaining the funding, carried out the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. DJ helped to carry out the subtle mutation analysis experiments (Cloning and sequencing); LE was responsible for diagnosis and management of patients; BJ contributed to the writing of the manuscript; JY and WH contributed to the sequencing experiments. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for publication.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu-jin, Q., Juan, D., Er-zhen, L. et al. Subtle mutations in the SMN1 gene in Chinese patients with SMA: p.Arg288Met mutation causing SMN1 transcript exclusion of exon7. BMC Med Genet 13, 86 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: