Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Association between insertion/deletion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis

BMC Medical Genetics volume 13, Article number: 76 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A previous meta-analysis reported a positive association between an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene (ACE) and the risk of acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Here, we updated this meta-analysis and additionally assessed the association of this polymorphism with ALI/ARDS mortality.

Methods

We searched electronic databases through October 2011 for the terms “angiotensin-converting enzyme gene”, “acute lung injury”, and “acute respiratory distress syndrome,” and reviewed all studies that reported the relationship of the I/D polymorphism in ACE with ALI/ARDS in humans. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 532 ALI/ARDS patients, 3032 healthy controls, and 1432 patients without ALI/ARDS. We used three genetic models: the allele, dominant, and recessive models.

Results

The ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with susceptibility to ALI/ARDS for any genetic model. However, the ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with the mortality risk of ALI/ARDS in Asian subjects ( P allele < 0.0001, P dominant = 0.001, P recessive = 0.002). This finding remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions

There is a possible association between the ACE I/D polymorphism genotype and the mortality risk of ALI/ARDS in Asians.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute lung injury (ALI) and its most severe form called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are characterized by increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier resulting in edema, excessive inflammatory responses, and interstitial fibrosis in the lung, thus impairing arterial oxygen exchange [1, 2]. Despite innovations in intensive care medicine, the mortality of ARDS remains up to 40% [2]. Therefore, clarification of the unknown pathophysiology and the development of effective therapeutics are urgently needed to overcome the life-threatening conditions induced by ALI/ARDS. It has been suggested that the type and severity of injury may affect the occurrence of ALI/ARDS; however, it remains unclear why up to 50% of individuals are not affected despite experiencing similar injuries [3, 4]. Several genetic variants have been suggested to be associated with the development and progression of ALI/ARDS (reviewed by Flores et al. [5]).

The human angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene (ACE) is located on chromosome 17q23 and contains an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of a 287-bpAlu repeat sequence in intron 16 [6, 7]. Recently, strong evidence has accumulated for a pathophysiological association between lung and kidney diseases and the ACE I/D polymorphism, which is correlated with circulating and cellular ACE levels [8–12]. This evidence has been rendered using a meta-analysis approach that provided the most reliable compilation of the data currently available in the field [13, 14]. The studies of Marshall et al. [15], Jerng et al. [16], Lu et al. [17], and Adamzik et al. [18] have shown a significant positive association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the risk and/or mortality of ALI/ARDS, although the studies of Chan et al. [19], Plunkett et al. [20], and Villar et al. [21] failed to detect a positive association (Additional file 1: Table S1). This association therefore remains controversial. The discrepancy among these results may be because of different sample sizes, because the sample sizes of these studies were quite small for genetic association analysis. To overcome this limitation, Hu et al. [8] conducted a meta-analysis and reported that the ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with the risk of ALI/ARDS. However, we have noticed that two relevant studies were not included in this meta-analysis. Hence, to obtain a reliable conclusion regarding the association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and ALI/ARDS risk, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of all relevant publications, increasing the sample size from 3133 (in Hu et al.[8]) to 4996. In addition, we carried out a meta-analysis between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the mortality of ALI/ARDS.

Methods

We performed this meta-analysis according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA; 2009) [22].

Data sources and searches

To identify eligible studies, we (A.M. and T.K.) independently searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar citations through October 2011 using as key words the terms “angiotensin-converting enzyme gene” or “ACE gene”; “acute lung injury” or “ALI”; and “acute respiratory distress syndrome” or “ARDS”.

Study selection and eligibility criteria

We defined inclusion and exclusion criteria a priori. The inclusion criteria were: the study should (1) be published in a peer-reviewed journal, (2) contain independent data of ACE I/D genotype, (3) have the outcome as either development of ALI/ARDS or ALI/ARDS mortality, and (4) be a case–control study in human subjects. ALI/ARDS was defined as a lung disease with acute onset, non-cardiac diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, and a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 for ALI and a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 for ARDS [23]. Studies were excluded if they were duplicates. Studies included in the meta-analysis were not restricted by language.

Data extraction

The reference lists of reviews and retrieved articles were verified independently by two investigators (A.M. and T.K.). The following information was extracted from each article: first author’s name, year of publication, ethnicity, patient group, age, sex, number of cases and controls, type and number of lung injury patients (ALI or ARDS) and controls for each ACE I/D genotype, and mortality at each assessment time. The frequencies of alleles were calculated for cases and controls from the corresponding genotype distributions. Disagreement was resolved by discussion.

Statistical analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the risk and mortality of ALI/ARDS. Because the mode of inheritance of ALI/ARDS is unknown, we performed a meta-analysis with the allele (I allele versus D allele), dominant (I/I versus I/D + D/D), and recessive (I/I + I/D versus D/D) models (as recommended in [24]). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.0 for Windows (Cochrane Collaboration, http://www.cc-ims.net/RevMan). Cochran’s chi-square-based Q-statistic test was applied to assess between-study heterogeneity. We included healthy subjects and patients without ALI/ARDS (e.g., intensive care unit patients who did not fulfill the criteria for ALI/ARDS) as separate controls. The pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models [25] with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to measure the strength of the association. I2 indicates the percentage variance in the pooled OR that can be attributed to heterogeneity. Values of 25% are considered low, 50% moderate, and 75% high. We applied the conservative random effects model for all comparisons because the underlying effect may differ across studies and among heterogeneous populations. When we searched the HapMap database, we identified different linkage disequilibrium groups around the ACE gene among different ethnicities. Therefore, we conducted additional sensitivity analyses, separating the Caucasian and Asian participants. Finally, Bonferroni’s correction was used to control the type I error rate in the meta-analysis of mortality. We employed 18 separate tests (three genotype models: allele, dominant, and recessive; three populations: total, Caucasians, and Asians; and two traits: susceptibility and mortality); therefore, we calculated the corrected P value by multiplying the original P value by 18. P was considered significant at less than 0.05.

Publication bias was assessed using WINPEPI software (http://www.brixtonhealth.com/pepi4windows.html)[26], by visually examining a funnel plot and formally assessing asymmetry with both the Egger test [27] and the rank correlation test [28].

Results

Study characteristics

Our key word electronic database search yielded 119 references. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified seven studies for meta-analysis of the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and ALI/ARDS [15–21]. All the studies were published in English. Four studies were conducted in Caucasians [15, 18, 20, 21] and the remaining three studies were conducted in Asians [16, 17, 19]. All seven studies evaluated susceptibility to ALI/ARDS; four also evaluated the mortality of ALI/ARDS. The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Information on the studies included in the meta-analysis
Full size table

ACE I/D polymorphism and susceptibility to ALI/ARDS

ALI/ARDS patients versus healthy control subjects

Initially, we conducted a meta-analysis of ALI/ARDS risk using healthy control subjects, because this approach is more powerful than using other controls to confirm the association of genotype with disease susceptibility. Two studies [16, 20] did not include healthy subjects as control in their analysis; therefore, we used the remaining five [15, 17–19, 21], comprising 418 ALI/ARDS patients and 3032 healthy control subjects. We found significant heterogeneities among the ORs (P allele < 0.0001, P dominant = 0.003, and P recessive = 0.004) (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3). The pooled OR derived from the five studies [15, 17, 19, 21, 29] did not indicate significant association for any genotype model (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3). There was no significant publication bias using either the Egger test or the rank correlation test (data not shown). To limit the ethnic heterogeneity, we separated the studies into those with either Caucasian or Asian samples. In the three studies with Caucasian subjects [15, 18, 21], comprising 300 patients and 2470 healthy controls, we found significant heterogeneity among the ORs (P allele < 0.0001, P dominant = 0.001, P recessive = 0.0006) (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3). The pooled OR indicated no significant association (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3). In the two studies with Asian subjects [17, 19], comprising 118 patients and 562 healthy controls, there was no significant heterogeneity among the ORs (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3). The I/D polymorphism in ACE was not associated with susceptibility to ALI/ARDS in Asian subjects (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 4: Figure S3).

ALI/ARDS patients versus patients without ALI/ARDS

One study [18] did not include patients without ALI/ARDS as a control in the analysis; therefore, we used the remaining six [15–17, 19–21], comprising 448 ALI/ARDS patients and 1432 patients without ALI/ARDS. There were significant heterogeneities among the ORs (P allele = 0.0006, P dominant = 0.004, and P recessive = 0.03) (Additional file 5: Figure S4, Additional file 6: Figure S5, Additional file 7: Figure S6). The pooled OR derived from the six studies [15–17, 19–21] did not indicate significant association for any genotype model (Additional file 5: Figure S4, Additional file 6: Figure S5, Additional file 7: Figure S6). There was no significant publication bias using either the Egger test or the rank correlation test (data not shown). We then conducted an additional analysis to limit the ethnic heterogeneity. In the three studies with Caucasian subjects [15, 20, 21], comprising 229 ALI/ARDS patients and 553 patients without ALI/ARDS, we found significant heterogeneity among the ORs (P allele = 0.0009, P dominant = 0.03, and P recessive = 0.002) (Additional file 5: Figure S4, Additional file 6: Figure S5, Additional file 7: Figure S6). The pooled OR derived from the three studies [15, 20, 21] indicated no significant association for any genotype model (Additional file 5: Figure S4, Additional file 6: Figure S5, Additional file 7: Figure S6). In the three studies with Asian subjects [16, 17, 19], comprising 219 ALI/ARDS patients and 879 patients without ALI/ARDS, the I/D polymorphism in ACE was not associated with ALI/ARDS risk. There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (Additional file 5: Figure S4, Additional file 6: Figure S5, Additional file 7: Figure S6).

ACE I/D polymorphism and mortality of ALI/ARDS

In our meta-analysis, we used the four studies [16–18, 21] that reported ALI/ARDS-related mortality, comprising 196 survivors and 210 non-survivors. We found significant heterogeneities among the ORs (P allele = 0.001, P dominant = 0.04 and P recessive = 0.01) (Figures 1,2,3). The pooled OR derived from the four studies [16–18, 21] did not indicate a significant association for any genotype model (Figures 1 2 3). There was no significant publication bias using either the Egger test or the rank correlation test (data not shown). In the two studies with Caucasian subjects [18, 21], comprising 76 survivors and 128 non-survivors, we did not detect significant heterogeneity among the ORs (Figures 1,2,3). The pooled OR from the two studies [18, 21] did not show a significant association for any genetic model (Figures 1,2,3). In the two studies with Asian subjects [16, 17], comprising 120 survivors and 82 non-survivors, we did not detect significant heterogeneity among the ORs (Figures 1 2 3). The pooled OR from the two studies [16, 17] did indicate a significant association for all genetic models (P allele < 0.0001, P dominant = 0.001, P recessive = 0.002) (Figures 1,2and3). Moreover, the pooled OR remained significant after Bonferroni’s correction (corrected P allele < 0.0001, corrected P dominant = 0.018, corrected P recessive = 0.036).

Figure 1
figure 1

Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS mortality: allele model.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS mortality: dominant model.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS mortality: recessive model.

Full size image

Discussion

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been well documented to contribute to the pathophysiology of ALI/ARDS by increasing vascular permeability [30]. ACE is a key enzyme of the RAS that converts inactive angiotensin I to the vasoactive and aldosterone-stimulating peptide angiotensin II that metabolizes kinins and many other biologically active peptides [31]. ACE is found in varying amounts on the surface of lung epithelial and endothelial cells. Activation of the RAS can stimulate production of tumor necrosis factor alpha in cardiac fibroblasts [32]. Angiotensin II induces apoptosis of lung epithelial and endothelial cells and is a potent fibrogenic factor [33–36]. Based on these biological properties of ACE, there is considerable interest in its potential involvement in ALI/ARDS.

Despite conflicting findings among the genetic association studies, a recent meta-analysis [8] suggested a positive association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and ARDS susceptibility among Caucasians. Here, we have extended this meta-analysis to a much larger sample size (532 ALI/ARDS patients, 3032 healthy controls, and 1432 patients without ALI/ARDS), and failed to detect an association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and ALI/ARDS risk. The discrepancy may be because of the different methodology used and the different sample size. We believe that our result is more convincing because we added two studies to those used by Hu et al. [8] and also used three genetic models, as recommended in the literature [24]. Furthermore, we extended our meta-analysis to examine mortality, and detected a significant association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the mortality risk of ALI/ARDS in Asian populations.

ALI/ARDS patients had a higher frequency of the D/D genotype than controls did (Additional file 1: Table S1). The ACE I/D polymorphism has been associated with 28–47% of the variance in circulating ACE levels in healthy subjects, and high plasma ACE levels are associated with the D/D genotype [6, 7]. It is therefore possible that the high plasma ACE levels produced by having the D/D genotype affect the mortality of ALI/ARDS. Recently, ACE inhibitors have been reported to attenuate ALI induced by bleomycin, acid, and endotoxin in animal models [37–39]. Taken together, patients at risk of mortality from ALI/ARDS, as determined by ACE I/D polymorphism screening, may be good candidates for treatment with ACE inhibitors. Furthermore, because our results suggest that the ACE I/D polymorphism genotype might influence treatment outcome through differences in drug metabolism and activity, it will be important to investigate the pharmacogenomics of ALI/ARDS and gene–gene interactions in the RAS to clarify the role of different RAS genes in the pathophysiology and treatment response of ALI/ARDS.

We did not find an association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and ALI/ARDS mortality in the total population. However, there were significant heterogeneities among the ORs. This heterogeneity may be derived from: (1) different ancestries, (2) incomplete genotyping or genotyping error differences among the studies, and (3) a relatively small total sample size (196 survivors and 210 non-survivors). Differences in the genotype distributions have been reported between Caucasians and Asians, which may support the above explanations (the studies of Villar et al.[21] and Adamzik et al.[18] reported that the major allele was “Deletion”, but other Asian studies showed that the major allele was “Insertion”). Therefore, we stratified the population into Caucasian and Asian subjects, thereby eliminating the significant heterogeneity among the ORs for both ethnicities. After stratification, we detected a significant association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and ALI/ARDS mortality in Asian populations. D/D was the risk genotype for mortality in Asian ALI/ARDS patients.

Several limitations of our meta-analysis remain, e.g., a small sample size and differences in the quality control among the studies. Neither the mode of inheritance nor the heritability of ALI/ARDS is known. Therefore, we used three genetic models to obtain more statistical power than in previous individual studies. Based on the common disease-common variant hypothesis, and assuming ALI/ARDS to be a complex disease, at least 4000 samples ( i.e., 2000 cases and 2000 controls) are required to obtain sufficient statistical power (GRR = 2.0 and P = 5 × 10-7) [40]. Given that our study is under-powered because of its small sample size, we may have failed to detect a genuine association between the ACE I/D polymorphism genotype and ALI/ARDS susceptibility. A replication study using a larger sample size, and/or samples from other populations, is required to obtain conclusive results.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results indicate that the genotype of the I/D polymorphism in ACE may be a predictor of ALI/ARDS mortality in Asian populations. However, more case-control association investigations on larger, stratified populations are required to clarify the role of this polymorphism in ALI/ARDS risk and mortality.

References

  1. Ware LB: Pathophysiology of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 27: 337-349. 10.1055/s-2006-948288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ware LB, Matthay MA: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1334-1349. 10.1056/NEJM200005043421806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R: The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994, 149: 818-824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hudson LD, Milberg JA, Anardi D, Maunder RJ: Clinical risks for development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995, 151: 293-301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flores C, Pino-Yanes MM, Casula M, Villar J: Genetics of acute lung injury: past, present and future. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010, 76: 860-864.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F: An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990, 86: 1343-1346. 10.1172/JCI114844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiret L, Rigat B, Visvikis S, Breda C, Corvol P, Cambien F, Soubrier F: Evidence, from combined segregation and linkage analysis, that a variant of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene controls plasma ACE levels. Am J Hum Genet. 1992, 51: 197-205.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Z, Jin X, Kang Y, Liu C, Zhou Y, Wu X, Liu J, Zhong M, Luo C, Deng L, et al: Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome among caucasians. J Int Med Res. 2010, 38: 415-422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi Y, Sun J, Zhu T, Wang W, Liu J, Zhou W, Qiu C, Zhao D: Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism with high-altitude pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011, 12: 617-623. 10.1177/1470320311406572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin YH, Zhou TB, Su LN, Lei FY, Huang WF, Zhao YJ: Association between ACE polymorphism and risk of IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011, 12: 215-223. 10.1177/1470320310391835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou TB, Qin YH, Su LN, Lei FY, Huang WF, Zhao YJ: Relationship between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Gene Polymorphism and Susceptibility of Minimal Change Nephrotic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Nephrol. 2011, 360357-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Relationship%20between%20%20Angiotensin-Converting%20Enzyme%20Insertion%2FDeletion%20Gene%20Polymorphism%20and%20%20Susceptibility%20of%20Minimal%20Change%20Nephrotic%20Syndrome%3A%20A%20Meta-Analysis,

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou TB, Qin YH, Su LN, Lei FY, Huang WF, Zhao YJ, Pang YS, Yang KP: The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene variant and risk of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011, 12: 624-633. 10.1177/1470320311410584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG: Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2001, 29: 306-309. 10.1038/ng749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kishi T, Tsunoka T, Ikeda M, Kawashima K, Okochi T, Kitajima T, Kinoshita Y, Okumura T, Yamanouchi Y, Inada T, et al: Serotonin 1A receptor gene and major depressive disorder: an association study and meta-analysis. J Hum Genet. 2009, 54: 629-633. 10.1038/jhg.2009.84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall RP, Webb S, Bellingan GJ, Montgomery HE, Chaudhari B, McAnulty RJ, Humphries SE, Hill MR, Laurent GJ: Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is associated with susceptibility and outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 166: 646-650. 10.1164/rccm.2108086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jerng JS, Yu CJ, Wang HC, Chen KY, Cheng SL, Yang PC: Polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene affects the outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34: 1001-1006. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206107.92476.39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu XM, Chen GJ, Yang Y, Qiu HB: Angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism affects outcome of local Chinese with acute lung injury. Respir Med. 2011, 105: 1485-1490. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adamzik M, Frey U, Sixt S, Knemeyer L, Beiderlinden M, Peters J, Siffert W: ACE I/D but not AGT (−6)A/G polymorphism is a risk factor for mortality in ARDS. Eur Respir J. 2007, 29: 482-488. 10.1183/09031936.00046106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan KC, Tang NL, Hui DS, Chung GT, Wu AK, Chim SS, Chiu RW, Lee N, Choi KW, Sung YM, et al: Absence of association between angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism and development of adult respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a case control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 26-10.1186/1471-2334-5-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Plunkett A, Agbeko RS, Li K, Humphries SE, Klein NJ, Peters MJ: Angiotensin-converting enzyme D allele does not influence susceptibility to acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34: 2279-2283. 10.1007/s00134-008-1260-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Villar J, Flores C, Perez-Mendez L, Maca-Meyer N, Espinosa E, Blanco J, Sanguesa R, Muriel A, Tejera P, Muros M, et al: Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is not associated with susceptibility and outcome in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34: 488-495. 10.1007/s00134-007-0937-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009, 339: b2535-10.1136/bmj.b2535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wheeler AP, Bernard GR: Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a clinical review. Lancet. 2007, 369: 1553-1564. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60604-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zintzaras E: The generalized odds ratio as a measure of genetic risk effect in the analysis and meta-analysis of association studies. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2010, 9: Article21-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7: 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abramson JH: WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2011, 8: 1-10.1186/1742-5573-8-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Egger M: Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997, 315: 629-634. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Begg CB, Mazumdar M: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994, 50: 1088-1101. 10.2307/2533446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adamzik M, Frey UH, Rieman K, Sixt S, Beiderlinden M, Siffert W, Peters J: Insertion/deletion polymorphism in the promoter of NFKB1 influences severity but not mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33: 1199-1203. 10.1007/s00134-007-0649-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamamoto T, Wang L, Shimakura K, Sanaka M, Koike Y, Mineshita S: Angiotensin II-induced pulmonary edema in a rabbit model. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1997, 73: 33-40. 10.1254/jjp.73.33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambert DW, Clarke NE, Turner AJ: Not just angiotensinases: new roles for the angiotensin-converting enzymes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010, 67: 89-98. 10.1007/s00018-009-0152-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yokoyama T, Sekiguchi K, Tanaka T, Tomaru K, Arai M, Suzuki T, Nagai R: Angiotensin II and mechanical stretch induce production of tumor necrosis factor in cardiac fibroblasts. Am J Physiol. 1999, 276: H1968-1976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Behnia R, Molteni A, Igic R: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: mechanisms of action and implications in anesthesia practice. Curr Pharm Des. 2003, 9: 763-776. 10.2174/1381612033455413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Igic R, Behnia R: Properties and distribution of angiotensin I converting enzyme. Curr Pharm Des. 2003, 9: 697-706. 10.2174/1381612033455459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, et al: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005, 436: 112-116. 10.1038/nature03712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang R, Zagariya A, Ibarra-Sunga O, Gidea C, Ang E, Deshmukh S, Chaudhary G, Baraboutis J, Filippatos G, Uhal BD: Angiotensin II induces apoptosis in human and rat alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1999, 276: L885-889.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hagiwara S, Iwasaka H, Matumoto S, Hidaka S, Noguchi T: Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on the inflammatory response in in vivo and in vitro models. Crit Care Med. 2009, 37: 626-633. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958d91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. He X, Han B, Mura M, Xia S, Wang S, Ma T, Liu M, Liu Z: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril prevents oleic acid-induced severe acute lung injury in rats. Shock. 2007, 28: 106-111. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3180310f3a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang R, Ibarra-Sunga O, Verlinski L, Pick R, Uhal BD: Abrogation of bleomycin-induced epithelial apoptosis and lung fibrosis by captopril or by a caspase inhibitor. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000, 279: L143-151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sawcer S: Bayes factors in complex genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010, 18: 746-750. 10.1038/ejhg.2010.17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Rachel Agbeko for providing the genotype information. This work was supported in part by research grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and the Health Sciences Foundation (Research on Health Sciences focusing on Drug Innovation). Dr. Kishi is a postdoctoral fellow for research abroad, and is additionally supported by the Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology and the Ministry of Education.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Surgery, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA

      Akihisa Matsuda, Asha Jacob & Ping Wang

    2. Center for Immunology and Inflammation, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA

      Akihisa Matsuda, Asha Jacob, Monowar Aziz & Ping Wang

    3. Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

      Taro Kishi

    Authors
    1. Akihisa Matsuda
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Taro Kishi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Asha Jacob
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Monowar Aziz
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Ping Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Ping Wang.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    AM and TK had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. AM and TK designed the study, and acquired and analyzed the data. AM and TK drafted the manuscript. MA and AJ helped prepare the manuscript. PW supervised the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Akihisa Matsuda, Taro Kishi contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    12881_2011_965_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 1: Table S1. Genotype distribution, MAF, and GRR of the studies included in the meta-analysis. (JPEG 85 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 2: Figure S1. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: allele model. Control: healthy control subjects. (JPEG 76 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 3: Figure S2. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: dominant model. Control: healthy control subjects. (JPEG 73 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 4: Figure S3. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: recessive model. Control: healthy control subjects. (JPEG 74 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 5: Figure S4. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: allele model. Control: patients without ALI/ARDS. (JPEG 77 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM6_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 6: Figure S5. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: dominant model. Control: patients without ALI/ARDS. (JPEG 74 KB)

    12881_2011_965_MOESM7_ESM.jpeg

    Additional file 7: Figure 6. Forest plot of OR with 95% CI for ACE I/D polymorphism in ALI/ARDS susceptibility: recessive model. Control: patients without ALI/ARDS. (JPEG 75 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Matsuda, A., Kishi, T., Jacob, A. et al. Association between insertion/deletion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet 13, 76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-13-76

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-13-76

    Keywords

    BMC Medical Genetics

    ISSN: 1471-2350

    Contact us