Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Fibrinogen beta variants confer protection against coronary artery disease in a Greek case-control study

  • Eirini V Theodoraki1Email author,
  • Tiit Nikopensius2, 7,
  • Julia Suhorutšenko2,
  • Vassileios Peppes3,
  • Panagiota Fili1,
  • Genovefa Kolovou4,
  • Vassileios Papamikos1,
  • Dimitrios Richter5,
  • Nikolaos Zakopoulos3,
  • Kaarel Krjutškov2, 7,
  • Andres Metspalu2, 6, 7 and
  • George V Dedoussis1
BMC Medical Genetics201011:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-11-28

Received: 24 June 2009

Accepted: 18 February 2010

Published: 18 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Although plasma fibrinogen levels are related to cardiovascular risk, data regarding the role of fibrinogen genetic variation in myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery disease (CAD) etiology remain inconsistent. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of fibrinogen A (FGA), fibrinogen B (FGB) and fibrinogen G (FGG) gene SNPs and haplotypes on susceptibility to CAD in a homogeneous Greek population.

Methods

We genotyped for rs2070022, rs2070016, rs2070006 in FGA gene, the rs7673587, rs1800789, rs1800790, rs1800788, rs1800787, rs4681 and rs4220 in FGB gene and for the rs1118823, rs1800792 and rs2066865 SNPs in FGG gene applying an arrayed primer extension-based genotyping method (APEX-2) in a sample of CAD patients (n = 305) and controls (n = 305). Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), before and after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

None of the FGA and FGG SNPs and FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG haplotypes was associated with disease occurrence after adjustment. Nevertheless, rs1800787 and rs1800789 SNPs in FGB gene seem to decrease the risk of CAD, even after adjustment for potential confounders (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.19-0.90, p = 0.026 and OR = 0.44, 95%CI:0.21-0.94, p = 0.039, respectively).

Conclusions

FGA and FGG SNPs as well as FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG haplotypes do not seem to be important contributors to CAD occurrence in our sample. On the contrary, FGB rs1800787 and rs1800789 SNPs seem to confer protection to disease onset lowering the risk by about 50% in homozygotes for the minor alleles.

Background

Fibrinogen (Factor I) constitutes a water-soluble glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 340 kDa that is mainly synthesized in hepatocytes. It is a major factor of the coagulation system that participates in the process of hemostasis in two discrete pathways: Primarily, it is part of the final common pathway of the coagulation cascade. Secondarily, fibrinogen is bound to platelet GpIIb/IIIa membrane receptors and forms a web that provides stability to the newly-formed thrombus [1, 2]. Apart from its role in coagulation reactions, fibrinogen participates in atherosclerosis development by promoting the adhesion of platelets and white blood cells to the endothelial surface [35] by promoting muscle cell proliferation and migration, as well as by modulating the binding of plasmin with its receptor [1]. Fibrinogen levels in plasma have been associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction risk in prospective studies [69]. However, it is still unclear whether increased fibrinogen levels are causal to disease development or just a secondary phenomenon.

Fibrinogen circulates in plasma as a dimer, composed of three pairs of polypeptide chains denoted Aa (alpha), Bb (beta) and γ (gamma) encoded by fibrinogen alpha (FGA), beta (FGB) and gamma (FGG) genes respectively that are clustered on chromosome 4q31[10]. A variant of γ chain, named γ' is derived by alternate splicing of the primary mRNA [11]. The genes are arranged in order FGG-FGA-FGB, within a 50 kb region, with the transcriptional direction of FGG and FGA opposite to that of FGB [10].

The study of SNPs and haplotypes of fibrinogen genes in relation to coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI) occurrence has yielded to date inconsistent results. Some investigators have reported associations between fibrinogen gene SNPs or haplotypes with MI or CAD occurrence [1214], whereas other studies have not replicated these associations [1518].

Although numerous studies have been performed, scarce data concerning the role of fibrinogen gene SNPs or haplotypes in the Greek population are available. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case-control study involving 305 patients presenting with either CAD or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 305 healthy control subjects in order to investigate the impact of FGA, FGB and FGG gene SNPs and haplotypes on disease occurrence.

Methods

Study participants were recruited from 3 hospitals found in the area of Athens. Cases were subjects presenting with either ACS or stable CAD defined as >50% stenosis in at least one of the three main coronary vessels assessed by coronary angiography. ACS was defined as acute MI or unstable angina corresponding to class III of the Braunwald classification [19]. ACS patients have also undergone coronary angiography examination that verified the presence of significant stenosis.

Controls were subjects with negative coronary angiography findings, or negative stress test, or subjects without symptoms of disease that were admitted at the same hospitals as cases and were free of any cardiovascular disease, cancer, or inflammatory diseases. Moreover, we excluded subjects with renal or hepatic disease from both study groups. The bioethics committee of Harokopio University approved the study and all participants gave their informed consent.

Regarding the clinical characteristics of study subjects, hypercholesterolemia was defined as total cholesterol levels greater than 200 mg/dl or use of hypolipidemic medication, while hypertension was defined as blood pressure levels greater than 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication. We classified as diabetics subjects with blood glucose levels greater than 126 mg/dl or subjects that were under special diet or treatment. Finally, positive family history of myocardial infarction was defined as the presence of myocardial infarction in first degree male relatives at age < 55 years or in first degree female relatives at age <65 years.

Altogether 13 tag SNPs were genotyped for each individual in case-control samples. Carlson's algorithm was applied for SNP selection using Tagger implementation introduced in Haploview [20], where HapMap CEU was used as a reference population (with thresholds r2 ≥ 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 10%) [21]. SNPs were selected for each gene including 10 kb of both upstream and downstream sequences. A SNP rs1800787 in FGB gene was force-included to Tagger selection referring to the previously published data. Selected SNPs, as well as their location in the gene, are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

TagSNPs for the FGA, FGB and FGG genes.

Gene

tagSNP

Allelesa

SNP location

AA change

FGA

rs2070022

C>T

3' UTR

-

 

rs2070016

C>T

Intron 2

-

 

rs2070006

A>G

5' upstream

-

FGB

rs7673587

C>T

5' upstream

-

 

rs1800789

G>A

5' upstream

-

 

rs1800790

G>A

5' upstream

-

 

rs1800788

C>T

5' upstream

-

 

rs1800787

C>T

5' upstream

-

 

rs4681

C>T

Exon 7

Y375Y

 

rs4220

G>A

Exon 8

R478K

FGG

rs1118823

T>A

3' downstream

-

 

rs2066865

G>A

3' downstream

-

 

rs1800792

T>C

5' upstream

-

aAlleles are depicted from the coding strand for all SNPs except of rs2070022, rs2070016, rs2070006, rs2066865 and rs1800792 that are depicted from the non-coding one.

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the salting-out method [22]. Genotyping was performed using an arrayed primer extension-based genotyping method (APEX-2). This method allows multiplex DNA amplification and detection of SNPs on microarrays via four-color single-base primer extension [23].

The standard chi-square test was used to test for deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and to evaluate the differences in genotype distributions between cases and controls.

The odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression under the assumption of the additive, dominant and recessive models. Logistic regression including age, sex, and the presence of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and smoking as covariates was used to calculate adjusted ORs. Analysis of single SNPs effects was performed using PLINK 1.05 [24].

Haplotypes were constructed for each gene separately and for FGG-FGA genes. We did not consider FGA-FGG-FGB haplotypes in the analysis due to weak LD (Linkage Disequilibrium) between FGA-FGG and FGB variants. THESIAS software [25] was used to calculate haplotype frequencies in cases and controls as well as ORs and respective 95% confidence intervals before and after adjustment for the aforementioned covariates using the most common haplotype as a reference. LD measures (r2 and D') between SNPs were calculated using Haploview [20]. D' values are given in Figure 1. All p-values are based on two-sided tests and compared to a significance level of 5%.
Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium structure. D' values between SNPs in FGA, FGB and FGG genes.

Power analysis was performed using Quanto 1.2 software.

Results

Table 2 summarises the characteristics of 305 CAD and ACS cases and 305 control subjects. The two study groups differed in a predictable manner, i.e. cases exhibited a higher prevalence of risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes and smoking. Patients presenting ACS represented 62.6% of all cases. Mean age, as well as the percentage of male subjects was lower among controls than in cases. BMI did not present statistically significant differences between the two study groups. Although hypercholesterolemia was most common among cases, total cholesterol and LDL levels are higher in the control group, due to the less frequent use of hypolipidemic medication.
Table 2

General characteristics of patients and controls included in our study.

Subject characteristics

Cases

(n = 305)

Controls

(n = 305)

P-value

Stable CAD (%)

37.4

-

 

ACS (%)

62.6

-

 

Age (years)

63.14 ± 11.41

60.37 ± 14.86

0.011

Male sex (%)

81.6

70.2

0.001

BMI (kg/m 2 )

27.9 ± 3.8

28.2 ± 4.6

0.403

Hypercholesterolemia (%)

76.9

59.0

<0.001

Diabetes (%)

32.4

15.1

<0.001

Hypertension (%)

71.7

58.8

0.001

Family history of MI (%)

28.0

16.7

0.001

Current or former smoking (%)

74.2

61.0

<0.001

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

197.7 ± 47.7

214.4 ± 40.4

<0.001

LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

126.6 ± 41.6

141.2 ± 36.4

<0.001

HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

50.6 ± 12.6

45.8 ± 14.3

<0.001

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

144.2 ± 66.8

118.1 ± 65.6

<0.001

All SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium except for FGB rs7673587 and rs1800788 SNPs (p < 0.05) that were excluded from subsequent analysis.

Logistic regression analysis was performed for FGA, FGB and FGG gene SNPs separately, under the assumption of the additive, dominant and recessive models. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated before and after adjustment for age, sex and the presence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes and smoking. Four SNPs were nominally associated with disease in at least one model of inheritance (Table 3).
Table 3

Results from logistic regression analysis for SNPs with significant associations before adjustment.

GENE

SNP

Genotype frequency

Minor allele frequency

Model

OR;95% CI

P-value

adjusted OR; 95% CIa

adjusted P-valuea

   

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

     
  

AA

0.36

0.46

  

Additive

1.26;1.00-1.59

0.055

1.26;0.97-1.63

0.081

FGA

rs2070006

AG

0.51

0.41

0.39

0.34

Dominant

1.51;1.09-2.09

0.013

1.39;0.97-1.99

0.077

  

GG

0.13

0.13

  

Recessive

1.07;0.67-1.70

0.788

1.28;0.77-2.14

0.336

  

GG

0.56

0.58

  

Additive

0.92; 0.71-1.19

0.514

0.88;0.66-1.17

0.376

FGB

rs1800789

GA

0.39

0.33

0.24

0.26

Dominant

1.06; 0.77-1.46

0.733

1.00;0.70-1.44

0.990

  

AA

0.05

0.09

  

Recessive

0.47; 0.24-0.92

0.026

0.42;0.19-0.90

0.026

  

CC

0.58

0.55

  

Additive

0.83; 0.64-1.07

0.153

0.77;0.58-1.03

0.076

FGB

rs1800787

CT

0.37

0.36

0.24

0.27

Dominant

0.89; 0.65-1.23

0.473

0.81;0.57-1.16

0.254

  

TT

0.05

0.09

  

Recessive

0.50; 0.26-0.96

0.039

0.44;0.21-0.94

0.034

  

GG

0.61

0.70

  

Additive

1.31;0.99-1.75

0.062

1.32;0.97-1.80

0.077

FGG

rs2066865

GA

0.34

0.26

0.21

0.17

Dominant

1.40;1.00-1.97

0.051

1.42;0.98-2.07

0.066

  

AA

0.05

0.04

  

Recessive

1.31;0.59-2.93

0.513

1.35;0.58-3.12

0.486

Results from logistic regression analysis for FGA, FGB and FGG gene SNPs that were significantly associated with disease, before adjustment for confounding variables.

a adjustment for age, sex and the presence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes and smoking

Thus, carriers of one minor allele of rs2070006 in FGA gene exhibited an OR of 1.26 (95% CI:0.99-1.59, p = 0.055), that after adjustment was 1.26 (95% CI:0.98-1.63, p = 0.081). When carriers of the minor allele were grouped together, i.e. when modeled dominantly, the unadjusted OR was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.09-2.09, p = 0.013), while after adjustment OR was 1.39 (95% CI:0.97-1.99, p = 0.077).

In the case of FGB gene two SNPs, rs1800787 and rs1800789, were associated with disease occurrence in the recessive model, and the association remained significant after adjustment for the confounding variables (OR = 0.47, 95% CI:0.24-0.92, p = 0.026 and OR = 0.50, 95% CI:0.27-0.96, p = 0.039, respectively). The association of those SNPs with disease was significant even after further adjustment for obesity (BMI > 27) (OR = 0.40, 95% CI:0.18-0.18, p = 0.023 and OR = 0.38, 95% CI:0.17-0.85, p = 0.019, respectively).

Rs2066865 in FGG gene showed borderline association with CAD. For carriers of one minor allele, the unadjusted OR was 1.31 (95% CI:0.99-1.75, p = 0.062), while after adjustment it was 1.32 (95% CI:0.97-1.80, p = 0.077). Results did not differ much when the dominant model was considered. No other SNP in FGA, FGB and FGG genes was associated with disease occurrence.

In Table 4 the inferred haplotypes for FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG SNPs with frequency >5% are presented. In Table 5 the ORs and 95% CIs are presented for each haplotype before and after adjustment for the same confounding variables as in the case of single SNPs. We used the most common haplotype as a reference category. FGA-FGG H3 haplotype TGATTA bearing the 2 minor alleles of rs2070006 and rs2066865 was associated with CAD in the unadjusted analysis (OR = 1.42, 95% CI:1.02-1.98, p = 0.040), but after adjustment for confounding factors the statistical significance was lost (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.94-2.02, p = 0.098).
Table 4

Haplotypes for FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG gene SNPs with frequencies >5%.

SNPs

Haplotypes

rs2070006

rs2070022

rs2070016

rs1800792

rs1118823

rs2066865

rs1800787

rs1800789

rs1800790

rs4681

rs4220

FGA-H1

T

G

A

        

FGA-H2

C

G

A

        

FGA-H3

C

G

G

        

FGA-H4

C

A

A

        

FGG-H1

   

C

T

G

     

FGG-H2

   

T

A

G

     

FGG-H3

   

T

T

A

     

FGB-H1

      

C

G

G

C

G

FGB-H2

      

T

A

A

T

A

FGA-FGG-H1

C

G

A

C

T

G

     

FGA-FGG-H2

C

G

G

C

T

G

     

FGA-FGG-H3

T

G

A

T

T

A

     

FGA-FGG-H4

C

A

A

T

A

G

     

FGA-FGG-H5

T

A

G

T

A

G

     

Bold and underlined letters indicate SNP minor alleles.

Table 5

Frequencies, ORs and 95% CIs for CAD in relation to the most frequent haplotypes.

Haplotype

Controls (%)

Cases (%)

OR;95%CI

P-value

adjusted OR;95%CIa

adjusted P-valuea

FGA-H1

33.00

38.13

referent

referent

FGA-H2

28.88

26.25

0.80;0.60-1.05

0.104

0.81;0.59-1.11

0.186

FGA-H3

21.10

20.27

0.84;0.62-1.14

0.256

0.75;0.53-1.07

0.111

FGA-H4

16.20

14.65

0.78;0.55-1.11

0.164

0.84;0.56-1.26

0.396

FGG-H1

48.84

45.16

referent

referent

FGG-H2

32.78

32.81

1.06;0.83-1.36

0.638

1.13;0.86-1.50

0.387

FGG-H3

16.55

20.78

1.31;0.97-1.77

0.078

1.31;0.93-1.87

0.122

FGB-H1

72.34

75.37

referent

referent

FGB-H2

21.84

20.77

0.92;0.71-1.20

0.547

0.89;0.65-1.21

0.463

FGA-FGG-H1

26.00

23.97

referent

referent

FGA-FGG-H2

19.50

18.31

1.05;0.76-1.45

0.771

0.94;0.65-1.37

0.755

FGA-FGG-H3

15.71

20.08

1.42;1.02-1.98

0.040

1.38;0.94-2.02

0.098

FGA-FGG-H4

15.85

14.60

1.03;0.71-1.48

0.893

1.09;0.72-1.66

0.665

FGA-FGG-H5

14.03

15.28

1.22;0.86-1.75

0.264

1.21;0.79-1.84

0.381

a adjustment for age, sex and the presence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes and smoking

Further adjustment for lipid levels, i.e. total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, did not significantly affect our results concerning both single SNP and haplotype effects.

Discussion

Evidence from epidemiologic studies and meta-analyses suggests that increased plasma fibrinogen levels are related to increased coronary artery disease risk [6]. Despite the existence of numerous studies that support an association between plasma fibrinogen levels and certain SNPs or haplotypes [13, 15, 2628], data linking the latter with CAD occurrence still remain controversial.

In the present study we used a tagSNP approach to evaluate the role of genetic variation across FGA, FGB and FGG genes in the occurrence of coronary artery disease in a homogeneous Greek population sample of 305 patients and 305 controls. CAD was defined as either presence of angiographically proven significant stenosis in coronary vessels or ACS.

The allele frequencies in controls, observed in our study, were similar to the ones reported for HapMap CEU reference population. Rs2070006 and rs2066865 SNPs in FGA and FGG genes respectively were nominally associated with increased risk of CAD both in the additive and dominant models of inheritance, but statistical significance was lost after adjustment. On the other hand, homozygotes for the minor alleles of rs1800787 and rs1800789 SNPs in FGB gene exhibited a decreased risk of CAD remaining statistically significant after adjustment for confounding factors.

Haplotype analysis showed that when FGA and FGG gene SNPs were considered together, FGA-FGG-H3 haplotype TGATTA bearing the minor alleles of both rs2070006 and rs2066865 SNPs was associated with an increase in disease risk in the unadjusted analysis, but after adjustment this association disappeared.

Therefore, our results do not reveal an important role of FGA and FGG gene SNPs and FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG haplotypes in CAD occurrence and are in accordance with previously published data. The initial associations published by Mannila et al. [1214] supporting a role of FGG-FGA and FGG-FGB haplotypes in myocardial infarction risk have not been replicated by other investigators that studied single SNPs and haplotypes in FGA, FGB and FGG genes in MI or CAD phenotypes [1518].

Rs1800790 SNP in FGB gene was shown to be associated with decreased MI risk applying the recessive model in a meta-analysis [29]. Recently, the same SNP was found to exert protective effect against premature myocardial infarction in a Greek population [30]. In our study we could not replicate these findings. Interestingly, we found rs1800787 and rs1800789 variants, that are highly correlated with rs1800790 (r2 = 0.943 and r2 = 0.928, respectively), to decrease disease risk by about 50%, when modeled recessively. One could hypothesize that the effect of rs1800790, found in the previous studies, is attributed to the strong LD with SNPs rs1800787 and/or rs1800789 - these two tightly linked SNPs most likely are representing the same signal of association with the disease and either of these SNPs might be the functional one. Previous studies that included these SNPs, or others that are in strong LD with them, resulted in negative findings, but in those studies the effect of the SNPs in the recessive model was not considered [15, 16].

Our study is limited by the small sample size. A posterior analysis revealed that the power of our sample to detect an odds ratio from 0.4-0.5 was 0.5-0.8, depending on minor allele frequency, with significance level alpha 0.05. We cannot exclude the possibility of a modest effect of SNPs or haplotypes in disease predisposition that would possibly be apparent in a larger sample. Nevertheless, our sample size is similar to that of Mannila et al. that studied eight fibrinogen SNPs in 377 post-infarction patients and 387 healthy individuals and found that fibrinogen haplotypes, and not SNPs, were associated with the risk of MI [14].

Another important limitation of our study is the lack of information concerning the effect of SNPs or haplotypes on fibrinogen levels. Moreover, we have not taken into account the effect of proinflammatory markers, such as IL-6, that have been shown to modify the effect of SNPs on fibrinogen levels [26], and possibly the effect of SNPs in disease risk. Nevertheless, in the multivariate analysis we have adjusted our models for the presence of obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes that represent in a way the proinflammatory status and may partially compensate for the lack of information for the levels of specific inflammatory markers.

The results of our study should be interpreted with caution, taking into account the multiple tests performed. If we applied the conservative Bonferroni's correction then the level of statistical significance should be 0.001 and none of our associations would remain significant. Nevertheless, the fact that rs1800787 and rs1800789 are highly correlated with rs1800790 that has been previously associated with disease increases our confidence for our results.

Futhermore, we cannot exclude the possibility of misclassification of subjects with silent CAD in the control group among subjects that were not subjected to coronary angiography or stress test and who reported absence of symptoms of disease. Finally, cases with fatal MI were not included. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that this polymorphism may predispose for more severe disease phenotypes.

Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that FGA and FGG variants as well as FGA, FGB, FGG and FGA-FGG haplotypes do not seem to be important contributors to CAD occurence in our Greek population. Nevertheless, FGB rs1800787 and rs1800789 variants, in the recessive model, seem to confer protection to disease onset lowering the risk by about 50%.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The project was financially supported by the General Secretary of Research and Technology (PENED 03EΔ474) (EVT and GVD), by the Targeted Financing from the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (SF0180142s08), EU FP7 grant ECOGENE (#205419, EBC) and by EU via the European Regional Development Fund grant to the Centre of Excellence in Genomics, Estonian Biocentre and University of Tartu (TN, JS and AM).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Harokopio University of Athens, Department of Dietetics and Nutritional Science
(2)
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu
(3)
University of Athens Medical School "Alexandra Hospital", Department of Clinical Therapeutics
(4)
Onassis Cardiac Surgery, 1st Cardiology Clinic
(5)
Department of Cardiology, Athens Euroclinic
(6)
Estonian Genome Center, University of Tartu
(7)
Estonian Biocentre

References

  1. Koenig W: Fibrin(ogen) in cardiovascular disease: an update. Thromb Haemost. 2003, 89 (4): 601-609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reinhart WH: Fibrinogen--marker or mediator of vascular disease?. Vasc Med. 2003, 8 (3): 211-216. 10.1191/1358863x03vm494ra.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Duperray A, Languino LR, Plescia J, McDowall A, Hogg N, Craig AG, Berendt AR, Altieri DC: Molecular identification of a novel fibrinogen binding site on the first domain of ICAM-1 regulating leukocyte-endothelium bridging. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (1): 435-441. 10.1074/jbc.272.1.435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harley SL, Sturge J, Powell JT: Regulation by fibrinogen and its products of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in human saphenous vein endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000, 20 (3): 652-658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stolpe van de A, Jacobs N, Hage WJ, Tertoolen L, van Kooyk Y, Novakova IR, de Witte T: Fibrinogen binding to ICAM-1 on EA.hy 926 endothelial cells is dependent on an intact cytoskeleton. Thromb Haemost. 1996, 75 (1): 182-189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Danesh J, Collins R, Appleby P, Peto R: Association of fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, albumin, or leukocyte count with coronary heart disease: meta-analyses of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998, 279 (18): 1477-1482. 10.1001/jama.279.18.1477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Danesh J, Lewington S, Thompson SG, Lowe GD, Collins R, Kostis JB, Wilson AC, Folsom AR, Wu K, Benderly M, et al: Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005, 294 (14): 1799-1809. 10.1001/jama.294.14.1799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ernst E, Resch KL: Fibrinogen as a cardiovascular risk factor: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 1993, 118 (12): 956-963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maresca G, Di Blasio A, Marchioli R, Di Minno G: Measuring plasma fibrinogen to predict stroke and myocardial infarction: an update. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999, 19 (6): 1368-1377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kant JA, Fornace AJ, Saxe D, Simon MI, McBride OW, Crabtree GR: Evolution and organization of the fibrinogen locus on chromosome 4: gene duplication accompanied by transposition and inversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985, 82 (8): 2344-2348. 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2344.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung DW, Davie EW: gamma and gamma' chains of human fibrinogen are produced by alternative mRNA processing. Biochemistry. 1984, 23 (18): 4232-4236. 10.1021/bi00313a033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mannila MN, Eriksson P, Ericsson CG, Hamsten A, Silveira A: Epistatic and pleiotropic effects of polymorphisms in the fibrinogen and coagulation factor XIII genes on plasma fibrinogen concentration, fibrin gel structure and risk of myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2006, 95 (3): 420-427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mannila MN, Eriksson P, Leander K, Wiman B, de Faire U, Hamsten A, Silveira A: The association between fibrinogen haplotypes and myocardial infarction in men is partly mediated through pleiotropic effects on the serum IL-6 concentration. J Intern Med. 2007, 261 (2): 138-147. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01749.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannila MN, Eriksson P, Lundman P, Samnegard A, Boquist S, Ericsson CG, Tornvall P, Hamsten A, Silveira A: Contribution of haplotypes across the fibrinogen gene cluster to variation in risk of myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2005, 93 (3): 570-577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carty CL, Cushman M, Jones D, Lange LA, Hindorff LA, Rice K, Jenny NS, Durda JP, Walston J, Carlson CS, et al: Associations between common fibrinogen gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Thromb Haemost. 2008, 99 (2): 388-395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kardys I, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Witteman JC, de Maat MP: Fibrinogen gene haplotypes in relation to risk of coronary events and coronary and extracoronary atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Study. Thromb Haemost. 2007, 97 (2): 288-295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koch W, Hoppmann P, Biele J, Mueller JC, Schomig A, Kastrati A: Fibrinogen genes and myocardial infarction: a haplotype analysis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28 (4): 758-763. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Uitte de Willige S, de Visser MC, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Rosendaal FR, Vos HL, Bertina RM: Genetic variation in the fibrinogen gamma gene increases the risk for deep venous thrombosis by reducing plasma fibrinogen gamma' levels. Blood. 2005, 106 (13): 4176-4183. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Braunwald E: Shattuck lecture--cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med. 1997, 337 (19): 1360-1369. 10.1056/NEJM199711063371906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA: Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (1): 106-120. 10.1086/381000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16 (3): 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Krjutskov K, Andreson R, Magi R, Nikopensius T, Khrunin A, Mihailov E, Tammekivi V, Sork H, Remm M, Metspalu A: Development of a single tube 640-plex genotyping method for detection of nucleic acid variations on microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (12): e75-10.1093/nar/gkn357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, et al: PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 81 (3): 559-575. 10.1086/519795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Tregouet DA, Barbaux S, Escolano S, Tahri N, Golmard JL, Tiret L, Cambien F: Specific haplotypes of the P-selectin gene are associated with myocardial infarction. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11 (17): 2015-2023. 10.1093/hmg/11.17.2015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacquemin B, Antoniades C, Nyberg F, Plana E, Muller M, Greven S, Salomaa V, Sunyer J, Bellander T, Chalamandaris AG, et al: Common genetic polymorphisms and haplotypes of fibrinogen alpha, beta, and gamma chains affect fibrinogen levels and the response to proinflammatory stimulation in myocardial infarction survivors: the AIRGENE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 52 (11): 941-952. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Agerholm-Larsen B, Humphries SE, Abildgaard S, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG: A common mutation (G-455--> A) in the beta-fibrinogen promoter is an independent predictor of plasma fibrinogen, but not of ischemic heart disease. A study of 9,127 individuals based on the Copenhagen City Heart Study. J Clin Invest. 1997, 99 (12): 3034-3039. 10.1172/JCI119499.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. van 't Hooft FM, von Bahr SJ, Silveira A, Iliadou A, Eriksson P, Hamsten A: Two common, functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of the beta-fibrinogen gene contribute to regulation of plasma fibrinogen concentration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999, 19 (12): 3063-3070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Boekholdt SM, Bijsterveld NR, Moons AH, Levi M, Buller HR, Peters RJ: Genetic variation in coagulation and fibrinolytic proteins and their relation with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circulation. 2001, 104 (25): 3063-3068. 10.1161/hc5001.100793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rallidis LS, Gialeraki A, Fountoulaki K, Politou M, Sourides V, Travlou A, Lekakis I, Kremastinos DT: G-455A polymorphism of beta-fibrinogen gene and the risk of premature myocardial infarction in Greece. Thromb Res. 2009Google Scholar
  31. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/11/28/prepub

Copyright

© Theodoraki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement