Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dopamine D2 receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to alcohol dependence in Indian males: a preliminary study

BMC Medical Genetics201011:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-11-24

Received: 23 April 2009

Accepted: 11 February 2010

Published: 11 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter involved in reward mechanism in the brain and thereby influences development and relapse of alcohol dependence. The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene on chromosome 11 (q22-q23) has been found to be associated with increased alcohol consumption through mechanisms involving incentive salience attributions and craving in alcoholic patients. Therefore, we investigated the association of three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in DRD2 gene with alcohol dependence in the north Indian subjects.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis, genetic association of three polymorphisms from DRD2 gene with alcohol dependence was investigated using a case-control approach. Alcohol dependence was determined by DSM-IV criteria and a total of 90 alcoholics and 60 healthy unrelated age-matched control subjects were recruited. Odds ratio and confidence interval was calculated to determine risk conferred by a predisposing allele/genotype/haplotype. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to correlate various clinical parameters with genotypes, and to study pair-wise interactions between SNPs.

Results

The study showed a significant association of -141C Ins allele and a trend of association of TaqI A1 allele of DRD2 with alcohol dependence. Haplotype with the predisposing -141C Ins and TaqI A1 alleles (-141C Ins-A-A1) seems to confer ≈ 2.5 times more risk to develop alcohol dependence.

Conclusions

The study provides preliminary insight into genetic risk to alcohol dependence in Indian males. Two polymorphisms namely, -141C Ins/Del and TaqI A in DRD2 gene may have clinical implications among Indian alcoholic subjects.

Background

Alcohol dependence (AD) is a common but complex trait with an estimated 6.5% lifetime prevalence in the general population. Demographic data indicating higher concordance rate for monozygotic twins when compared with dizygotic twins suggest an important genetic contribution to the pathogenesis of alcohol dependence [1]. Approximately 50-60% of the population variance in alcohol dependence is accounted for by genetic factors [2], but this influence is almost certainly due to the combined effects of multiple genes, each exerting a small individual effect and interacting with other genes and environment [3].

The central dopamingeric system is widely considered to play a crucial role in development of dependence to a range of psychoactive substances including opiates, cocaine, nicotine and alcohol [46]. The dopaminergic system influences/regulates brain reward mechanism [7, 8] and is considered a strong candidate for alcohol dependence. Alcohol, by stimulating dopamine receptors, promotes dopamine release in the ventral striatum leading to increased alcohol consumption through mechanisms involving incentive salience attributions and craving [9]. Clinical investigation involving analysis of receptor density and function has implied that dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) density and function being lower among alcoholics may be responsible for craving and subsequent relapse [8]. The study of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in dopaminergic pathway genes has shown that inheritance of different SNPs can increase or decrease the risk of alcoholism [10]. Consequently, in several populations world over, genetic association studies have been carried out to determine polymorphisms in genes encoding dopaminergic system and susceptibility to alcohol dependence [1115]. Previous genetic association studies of the dopamine receptors (D1-D5) and transporter protein (DAT) have indicated that DRD2 is involved in susceptibility to alcoholism [16]. Presence of such clinical and genetic evidences has implicated DRD2 gene polymorphisms as strong candidates for alcoholism and therefore, they have been most widely studied.

Since 1990, many studies have addressed possible association of DRD2 polymorphism with alcoholism. However, findings of these studies have largely remained controversial. Inconsistent results have been explained in terms of DRD2 mediated "reward deficiency" syndrome, and/or population stratification bias [17]. Most of the positive findings are related to European or European American populations where as studies in Atayal natives of Taiwanese populations have generally been negative [18]. The DRD2 gene has three most commonly investigated polymorphisms (-141C Ins/Del, TaqI B and TaqI A) and the results are equivocal for their association with alcohol dependence [11, 12]. The promoter polymorphism (-141C Ins/Del, rs1799732) of the DRD2 gene involving the insertion (Ins)/deletion (Del) of a cytosine is related to receptor density [19]. SNP TaqI B being closer to the regulatory and structural coding regions (5' region) of the gene [20] is considered to play important role in transcription regulation. TaqI A SNP is regarded as the most dramatic polymorphism of DRD2 for its highly inconsistent association with AD. The A1 allele of TaqI A SNP has been found to be associated with low D2 dopamine receptor availability in the striatum [21]. Recently, it has become evident that the TaqI A polymorphism previously considered to be present in 3' UTR of DRD2 is actually located in a nearby novel gene (in reverse orientation) named ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing (ANKK1) where it causes a missense substitution [22]. TaqI A SNP of the ANKK1 gene is associated with increased striatal activity of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, the final enzyme in the biosynthesis of dopamine [22].

India, representing 1/6th of the world population, has sudden surge in alcohol dependence and related problems. As per the estimates of the National Survey, about 21% of male adult population could be described as 'Current User' (defined as consumption at least once in preceding one month), which translates into about 62 million people, out of which about 17% are dependent users [23]. However, only one genetic association study to unravel genetic predisposition in Indian alcoholic population has been carried out to date [24]. In view of the paucity of Indian data on genetic polymorphism of alcohol dependence, we aimed to investigate the association of DRD2 gene polymorphisms in alcohol dependent subjects of north Indian origin.

Methods

Study population

Ethical committee clearance from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) was obtained before initiation of the study. A written informed consent was obtained prior to recruitment of case and control subjects. The process of clinical assessment was carried out by qualified psychiatrist. One hundred and forty male alcohol dependent subjects attending the out patient department (OPD) at National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) were screened. Out of these, 37 were polysubstance users and 13 had co-morbid depression/anxiety/or schizophrenia, and therefore, were excluded from the study. Remaining 90 unrelated outpatients with alcohol dependence, in the age range of 18-60 years, were enrolled as cases (AD). A total of 60 unrelated healthy male employees of the hospital, without any history of substance use (except nicotine) were included as controls (C). Since nicotine use is widely prevalent among males in India, neither case nor controls were excluded on the basis of their nicotine use. All individuals regarded themselves to be of north Indian origin. Diagnosis of alcohol dependence was determined by experienced psychiatrists using the DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994; [25]). The study was conducted in accordance with worldwide good-clinical-practice (GCP) standards and confirmed to acceptable ethical standards as outlined by local requirements and the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 1989).

All patients were assessed for alcohol use parameters using AUDIT [26], and a semi-structured questionnaire. The semi-structured questionnaire included items on clinical details like ethnicity, family history, age at first use of alcohol, quantity of alcohol consumption (g/day), duration of alcohol use, duration of alcohol dependence, age at onset of dependence, presence/absence of delirium and any other psychiatric or physical illness. The same semi-structured questionnaire was used for assessment of the control population as well. The assessments also included liver function tests (LFT) such as serum proteins, albumin, bilirubin, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). LFT were estimated on autoanalyser using bio-chemical kits from Boehringer Mannheim kits (Germany).

Genetic Analysis

DNA was isolated from the lymphocytes using the conventional phenol-chloroform organic extraction method [27] and used for genetic analysis. Three SNPs were selected from the DRD2 locus based on prior published association reports, information content, minor allele frequency (MAF), linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure, and validation evidence. SNP genotyping was done using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) approach following previously published method [28, 29]. The digested PCR products were resolved on 2-3% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Genotypic profiles obtained for each of the polymorphisms are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Genotypic profiles obtained for DRD2 polymorphisms

SNP

Primers

Annealing temp./R.E./fragment size

-141C Ins/Del

F:5'GACCCAGCCTGCAATCAC3'

R:5'AGGAGCTGTACCTCCTCGG3'

57°C/Bst NI

Ins C = 124, 32

Del C = 156

TaqI B

F:5'GATGTGTAGGAATTAGCCAGG3'

R:5'GATACCCAGTTCAGGAAGTC3'

56°C/TaqI

G = 459

A = 267,192

TaqI A

F:5'CCGTCGACGGCTGGCCAAGTTGTCCA 3'

R:5'CCGTCGACCCTTCCTGAGTGTCATCA3'

58°C/TaqI

T (A1) = 310

C (A2) = 180,130

Position of the three SNPs studied in DRD2 along with their identification number is indicated below

-141C Ins/Del, promoter (rs1799732); G>A, TaqI B, 1 kb upstream from exon 2 (rs17294542); and T>C, TaqI A, 10 kb downstream from exon 8 (rs1800497).

Statistical Analysis

Comparison of all clinical variables between alcohol dependent (AD) and control (C) subjects was carried out by χ2 test for nominal variables or student's t-test for continuous variables. Continuous variables with skewed distribution were compared by Mann Whitney's U test. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested for each of the genetic marker. Allelic and genotypic associations of SNPs were evaluated by Pearson's χ2 test followed by odds ratio and 95% CI computation. Fisher' exact test was applied for SNPs having cell value less than 5 for any one (out of three) genotypes. Power of the sample size for each of the SNPs was calculated using PAWE software version 1.2 [30, 31]. Haplotype analysis was performed using PHASE-standard analysis version 2.0.2 [32, 33]. Chi-square values were derived from a series of 2 × 2 contingency tables based on the frequency of each haplotype versus all others between the AD and the control groups. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) analysis were carried out to correlate various clinical parameters with genotypes and to study pair-wise interactions between SNPs. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Clinical analysis

A comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between cases and controls are presented in Table 2. As can be seen in the table, on almost all demographic parameters, the control group was largely similar to the AD group. However, much larger proportion of AD subjects had education up to primary school (i.e. five years of formal schooling) only. The values for various clinical parameters such as AUDIT score, alcohol intake (g/day) SGOT, SGPT, GGT, cholesterol, and triglycerides (TG)] were significantly higher (P < 0.01) among AD (cases) as compared to the control group.
Table 2

Demographic and Clinical characteristics of the study population presented as Mean ± SD

Characteristics

AD (Case)

Controls

Age (y)

36.75 ± 9.27

35.17 ± 11.59

Married

86%

80%

Employed

96%

100%

Education up to Elementary School Only

37%

1%

Living with family

85%

82%

Age at first use of alcohol

19.89 ± 5.56

24.30 ± 6.28

Audit Score

32.12 ± 5.59

1.04 ± 1.58

Alcohol intake (g/day)

183.89 ± 104.54

2 ± 0.5

T.Bil. (mg/dl)

1.96 ± 0.78

0.7 ± 0.2

T.Prot. (g/dl)

7.02 ± 1.04

8.00 ± 0.76

Alb. (g/dl)

4.19 ± 0.54

4.52 ± 0.30

SGOT (U/l)

84.21 ± 27.76

27.02 ± 09.71

SGPT (U/l)

83.13 ± 26.29

28.30 ± 11.49

Chol. (mg/dl)

181.49 ± 53.11

132.62 ± 12.01

GGT (U/l)

210.02 ± 42.02

24.95 ± 11.88

TG (mg/dl)

198.58 ± 108.01

121.59 ± 11.80

Genetic analysis

All the three SNPs analyzed in the study were in HWE in the base line control population. No significant pair-wise linkage disequilibrium was observed between the three polymorphisms. Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in DRD2 and their association status with AD are presented in Table 3.
Table 3

Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in DRD2 and their association status with AD

SNPs

Genotypes

Statistics

Alleles

Statistics

Power (*G %)

-141C Ins/Del

Ins/Ins

Ins/Del

Del/Del

 

Ins

Del

  

AD

0.61

0.32

0.07

χ 2 = 11.0, P < 0.01

0.77

0.23

χ 2 = 4.3, P < 0.05

62

Controls

0.57

0.16

0.27

 

0.65

0.35

  

TaqI B

GG

GA

AA

 

G

A

  

AD

0.07

0.37

0.56

χ2 = 0.11, P = 0.94

0.25

0.75

χ2 = 0.12, P = 0.72

6

Controls

0.11

0.31

0.58

 

0.27

0.73

  

TaqI A

A1A1

A1A2

A2A2

 

A1

A2

  

AD

0.04

0.45

0.51

Fisher's exact test P < 0.05

0.27

0.73

Fisher's exact test p = 0.08

16

Controls

0.07

0.30

0.63

 

0.22

0.78

  

*G: the power of SNP to detect association, calculated using PAWE software

Of the three polymorphisms analyzed in DRD2 gene, significant allelic and genotypic association of -141C Ins/Del SNP was observed with alcohol dependence. SNP TaqI B did not show any allelic or genotypic association. For TaqI A SNP, genotype Taq A1A1 was present in negligible frequency. Categorical analysis showed significant association of Taq A1/A2 genotype (Fisher's exact p < 0.05) with alcohol dependence. In addition, a trend towards association of allele TaqI A1 with AD was also found (Table 3).

Significantly associated haplotypes of DRD2 gene present in AD subjects are shown in Table 4. Two (-141C Ins-A-A1, and -141C Del-A-A2) out of eight possible haplotypes in these cases were significantly associated with AD, former being predisposing and latter protective to AD (Table 4).
Table 4

Significantly associated SNP haplotypes in DRD2 gene

aHaplotype

C (120)

AD (180)

χ2

P

O.R (95% CI)

-141C Ins-A-A1

13(0.11)

38 (0.21)

5.39

0.02

2.20 (1.19-4.33)

-141C Del-A-A2

12 (0.10)

06 (0.03)

5.67

0.01b

0.31 (0.11-0.85)

aOrder of SNPs in the DRD2 haplotypes: -141C Ins/Del - G>A (Intron 1) - TaqI A (Intron 7)

bSignificant after Bonferroni correction α = 0.01

A combined analysis involving genetic and crucial clinical/laboratory parameters (SGOT, SGPT, GGT, and alcohol consumed/day) indicated that the sub-group of AD patients with -141C Ins/Ins genotype (of -141C Ins/Del polymorphism) had significantly higher values (P < 0.01) of SGOT, SGPT, and GGT as compared to those with -141C Ins/Del and -141C Del/Del genotypes.

To assess synergistic effect of various clinical and genotypic parameters (analyzed in this study), multiple logistic regression analysis (MLR) was carried out. Disease status was taken as the dependent parameter, and genotypes, alleles (-141C Ins/Del, TaqI B, TaqI A) and clinical parameters were taken as the independent variables. A significant association of SNP -141C Ins/Del of DRD2 gene (P < 0.05; OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.06-0.6) was seen with AD. Further categorical analysis identified -141C Ins allele (P < 0.05; OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.03-3.19) to be predisposing to AD. No significant interaction between any of the polymorphisms/genes was observed when pair-wise interactions between different polymorphisms were carried out by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Discussion

In relation to alcohol dependence, the research provides unambiguous evidence that genes and their polymorphisms play an important role in its development [34]. Alcohol increases synaptic dopamine, which reinforces self administration. In the ventral striatum and particularly in the nucleus accumbens, different drugs of abuse stimulate dopamine release thereby reinforcing drug consumption. The down regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in these areas of the brain have been associated with alcohol craving and an increase in the processing of alcohol-related stimuli in the medial prefrontal cortex [9]. Dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) encodes a G protein-coupled receptor located on post-synaptic dopaminergic neurons, which plays a central role in reward-mediating mesocorticolimbic pathways [20]. Possible association between polymorphisms at the DRD2 gene and alcohol dependence has been extensively investigated since first proposed in 1990 [35].

The present study tested association of three polymorphisms -141C Ins/Del, TaqI B and TaqI A, present at DRD2 gene locus with alcohol dependence in north Indian subjects.

To the best of our knowledge, this study constitutes the first association report with regard to the first two SNPs (-141C Ins/Del, TaqI B in DRD2 gene) with alcohol dependence from India. Although, association of TaqI A with AD has not been carried out in the north Indian population by anyone to date, a study from south India reported no association between TaqI A and alcoholism [24].

The -141C Ins/Del polymorphism has been investigated for its association with alcoholism in several studies across different populations [1, 36, 37], however, the results are inconsistent. This promoter polymorphism plays an important role in D2 receptor expression. An in vitro analysis suggested that -141C Ins/Del polymorphism of DRD2 alters its transcriptional activity and thus regulates the expression of DRD2 receptor [19]. An imaging study carried out in healthy volunteers demonstrated increased striatal receptor density in -141C Del carriers [38]. In a genetic association study, Samochowiec et al. (2000) suggested a possible role of -141C Ins/Del SNP (in particular haplotypic combination, Ins/G/A2) in German alcoholics [39]. However, in a family-based case-control study of a Polish population, they failed to replicate this finding [40]. Johann et al. (2005) studied the association of a -141C deletion variant (-141delC) of the DRD2 gene in well-characterized, primary chronic alcoholics of German descent and found an excess of the -141delC alleles in alcoholics with a paternal and grand-paternal history of alcoholism. They concluded that though the -141delC variant of DRD2 might be a protective factor against the development of withdrawal symptoms, it might also be a risk factor in a highly burdened subgroup of alcoholics with a paternal and grand-paternal history of alcoholism [41]. Significant association of SNP -141C Ins/Del (P < 0.05; OR 0.19, 95%, CI 0.06-0.6) in DRD2 gene with alcohol dependence followed by categorical analysis suggesting -141C Ins allele to be predisposing to alcohol dependence in the present study is in conformity with findings of Konishi et al., which indicated that -141C Ins allele is a genetic risk factor for alcoholism in Mexican-Americans [36]. Thus a significant over representation of -141C Ins allele in alcoholic subjects in our study may be correlated with decreased DRD2 receptor density in AD patients, which in turn stimulates craving - reward pathway - thereby promoting alcohol dependence. However, this statement should be interpreted with caution since Hirovonen et al., (2009) suggested that the -141C Ins/Del genotype did not influence extrastriatal DRD2 binding potential using 3D-PET imaging in healthy male controls [42]. Further, our results also suggest that presence of -141C Del/Del genotype confers protection from AD and -141C Ins allele carriers are at higher risk for developing AD as compared to -141C Del carriers. As the power to of the sample size to detect association of this SNP was moderate (G = 62%), the observed genotypic and allelic association with AD needs to be interpreted cautiously.

SNP TaqI B is closer to the regulatory and structural coding regions (5' region) of the DRD2 and thus supposed to play an important role in gene function [27]. It has been rarely investigated for its association with AD. Two studies [36, 43] carried out in Mexican-American population reported conflicting results with regard to association of this polymorphism with AD. Our observation of no allelic or genotypic association of TaqI B polymorphism with AD in north Indians concurs with Konshi et al. [36] reporting no positive association of TaqI B with AD in Mexican-Americans. However in a subsequent study, the same group reported an association of TaqI B polymorphism with early age of onset for alcohol drinking in Mexican-Americans [43].

ANKK1 rs1800497, previously called "DRD2 TaqI A", is one of the most frequently studied polymorphisms in DRD2 genetic studies. Neville et al. [44] determined that the DRD2 TaqI A is actually located not within DRD2, but rather within a protein-coding region, exon 8, of the adjacent ANKK1 gene. Blum et al. [35] reported the presence of A1 allele of DRD2 receptor gene classifying 77% of alcoholics, demonstrating an association of A1 allele with alcoholism. Association studies of the DRD2 TaqI A1 allele and alcohol consumption have remained ambiguous and controversial due to conflicting results [45]. Although the DRD2 TaqI A polymorphism and alcohol dependence have been studied extensively, it emerged that this polymorphism may affect substrate-binding specificity. It remains to be elucidated whether the associations with TaqI A are due to its own functionality or linkage disequilibrium with another DRD2 variation or with the ANKK1 gene [45]. Pohjalainen et al. [21] reported an association between A1 allele and low D2 receptor availability in healthy subjects indicating that A1 allele of the TaqI A polymorphism might be in linkage disequilibrium with a mutation in the promoter/regulatory gene that affects dopamine D2 receptor expression. This was further correlated with risk conferring nature of the A1 allele in subsequent association studies in different populations like Caucasians, Han Chinese, and Europeans [24]. However, few studies from East Asian, European and Caucasian populations reported negative association of TaqI A1 allele with alcohol dependence [46]. Recently, Samochowiec et al. (2006) also did not find any association of TaqI A1 with AD in a Polish population [40]. However, they observed a statistically significant preferential A2 allele transmission in DRD2 TaqI A gene polymorphism in subgroups of patients with early onset and withdrawal complications. Their results also suggested various subtypes of alcohol dependence, which differ depending on their genetic background and may confound association findings [40].

Further, Laruelle et al. (1998) did not find association between A1 allele and lower D2 receptor expression and suggested that D2 receptors binding potential is not affected by TaqI A polymorphism at the D2 receptor gene [47]. Our observation of association of TaqI A is due to significant excess of heterozygote Taq A1/A2 genotype in the AD population from north India which could be attributed to yet unknown selection pressure. However, a marginal association of allele TaqI A1 is in concurrence with the meta-analysis carried out by Munafo et al. where association of the DRD2 TaqI A polymorphism with alcoholism suggest that A1 allele confers modest increase in risk [48]. Considering this background, the association of TaqI A1 allele with AD in the present study could be due to the altered D2 receptor expression and reward mechanism in alcohol dependent subjects. Since the power of the sample size to detect association of this SNP was low (G = 16%), the observed association (of this SNP with AD) should not be over-interpreted.

Our observation of A2/A2 genotype being most common in North Indian population is in concurrence with Caucasian population where an excess of A2 homozygotes has been reported [49]. The A1 allele frequency ranges between 0.06 and 0.18 in populations with European ancestry, while a significantly higher frequency (0.7) is seen in native South American populations [24]. In the present study, allele frequency (0.22) observed for A1 allele is closer to European population whereas the allele frequency observed in the south Indian population (0.42) is similar to reports from south East Asian populations with allele frequency of 0.45 [24]. The observed difference in allele frequencies between north Indian and south Indian population is due, in part, to the many different waves of immigrants that have influenced the genetic structure of India. The Indo-European (IE) and Dravidian (DR) groups have been the major contributors to the development of Indian culture and society. People from southern part of India have Dravidian background, and those form northern part have Indo-European (Caucasoid) background [50].

Results of independent association of SNPs were replicated in haplotypic association. As expected haplotype containing -141C Ins and TaqI A1 alleles was found to be predisposing to alcoholism and conferred ≈ 2.5 times risk to patients with this haplotypic combination (-141C Ins-A-A1). On the other hand haplotypic combination with -141C Del and Taq A2 alleles (-141C Del-A-A2) seems to confer protection against alcoholism. Thus, our result of haplotypic association (-141C Ins-A-A1) is in partial concurrence with German population where haplotype Ins/A2 causes predisposition to severe alcoholism [36]. Inconsistency between our and the previous report [36] could be attributed to population specific differences in genetic structure.

SGOT, SGPT, and GGT are markers of alcohol related liver dysfunction. Heavy drinking causes acetaldehyde toxicity leading to liver damage. A sub-analysis based on genotypic constitution with regard to -141C Ins/Del SNP revealed significant alteration in liver functions (as indicated by higher SGOT, SGPT and GGT values) among patients with -141C Ins/Ins genotype. We propose that this finding of association of -141C Ins/Del SNP with liver dysfunction among alcoholics should be explored further, though in this study it may be a purely chance finding.

Conclusions

Two polymorphisms namely, -141C Ins/Del and TaqI A in DRD2 seem to have clinical implications in the development of alcoholism. However, our results have to be viewed in the perspective of potential limitation posed by small sample size and it warrants replication in larger sample sets.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Florez G, Saiz P, Garcia-Portilla P, A' lvarez S, Nogue'ýras L, Morales B, Alvarez V, Coto E, Bobes J: Association between the STin2 VNTR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene and treatment outcome in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2008, 43: 516-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McGue M: The behavioral genetics of alcoholism. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1999, 8: 109-15. 10.1111/1467-8721.00026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Edenberg HJ, Foround T: The genetics of alcoholism: identifying specific genes through family studies. Addict Biol. 2006, 11: 386-96. 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00035.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Koob GF, Le Moal M: Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001, 24: 97-129. 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lingford-Hughes A, Nutt D: Neurobiology of addiction and implications for treatment. Br J Psychiatry. 2003, 182: 97-100. 10.1192/bjp.182.2.97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Munafò M, Johnstone E, Murphy M, Walton R: New directions in the genetic mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction. Addict Biol. 2001, 6: 109-17. 10.1080/13556210020040181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dick DM, Foroud T: Candidate genes for alcohol dependence: a review of genetic evidence from human studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003, 27: 868-79. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000065436.24221.63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tupala E, Tiihonen J: Dopamine and alcoholism: neurobiological basis of ethanol abuse. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 28: 1221-47. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.06.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kienast T, Heinz A: Dopamine and the diseased brain. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2006, 5: 109-31. 10.2174/187152706784111560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hesselbrock V, Higuchi S, Soyka M: Recent developments in the genetics of alcohol-related phenotypes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005, 29: 1321-24. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000171955.52431.E7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson RA, Goldberg DM: Genetic markers of alcohol abuse. Clin Chim Acta. 1997, 257: 199-250. 10.1016/S0009-8981(96)06444-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldman D: Candidate genes in alcoholism. Clin Neurosci. 1995, 3: 174-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wildenberg van den E, Janssen RG, Hutchison KE, van Breukelen GJ, Wiers RW: Polymorphisms of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4 VNTR) and cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene (CNR1) are not strongly related to cue-reactivity after alcohol exposure. Addict Biol. 2007, 12: 210-20. 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00064.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang SY, Lin WW, Wan FJ, Chang AJ, Ko HC, Wang TJ, Wu PL, Lu RB: Monoamine oxidase-A polymorphisms might modify the association between the dopamine D2 receptor gene and alcohol dependence. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2007, 32: 185-92.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim DJ, Park BL, Yoon S, Lee HK, Joe KH, Cheon YH, Gwon DH, Cho SN, Lee HW, NamGung S, Shin HD: 5' UTR polymorphism of dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) associated with severity and temperament of alcoholism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 357: 1135-41. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasabe T, Furukawa A, Matsusita S, Higuchi S, Ishiura S: Association analysis of the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) SNP rs1076560 in alcoholic patients. Neurosci Lett. 2007, 412: 139-42. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Blomqvist O, Gelernter J, Kranzler HR: Family-based study of DRD2 alleles in alcohol and drug dependence. Am J Med Genet. 2000, 96 (Suppl 5): 659-64. 10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<659::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelernter J, Kranzler H: D2 dopamine receptor gene (DRD2) allele and haplotype frequencies in alcohol dependent and control subjects: no association with phenotype or severity of phenotype. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999, 20: 640-49. 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00110-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Arinami T, Gao M, Hamaguchi H, Toru M: A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the dopamine D2 receptor gene is associated with schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6: 577-82. 10.1093/hmg/6.4.577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauge XY, Grandy DK, Eubanks JH, Evans GA, Civelli O, Litt M: Detection and characterization of additional DNA polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene. Genomics. 1991, 10: 527-30. 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90431-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pohjalainen T, Rinne JO, Någren K, Lehikoinen P, Anttila K, Syvälahti EK, Hietala J: The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene predicts low D2 receptor availability in healthy volunteers. Mol Psychiatry. 1998, 3: 256-60. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000350.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Laakso A, Pohjalainen T, Bergman J, Kajander J, Haaparante M, Solin O, Syvälahti E, Hietala J: The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene is associated with increased activity of striatal L-amino acid decarboxylase in healthy subjects. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005, 15: 387-91. 10.1097/01213011-200506000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ray R: The Extent Pattern and Trends of drug abuse in India: National Survey. 2004, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaikh KJ, Naveen D, Sherrin T, Murthy A, Thennarasu K, Anand A, Benegal V, Jain S: Polymorphisms at the DRD2 locus in early-onset alcohol dependence in the Indian population. Addict Biol. 2001, 6: 331-35. 10.1080/13556210020077055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, 4Google Scholar
  26. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M: Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993, 88 (Suppl 6): 791-804. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Itokawa M, Arinami T, Futamura N, Hamaguchi H, Toru M: A structural polymorphism of human dopamine D2 receptor, D2(Ser311-->Cys). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993, 196: 1369-75. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Grandy DK, Zhang Y, Civelli O: PCR detection of the TaqA RFLP at the DRD2 locus. Hum Mol Genet. 1993, 12: 2197-10.1093/hmg/2.12.2197-a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Gordon D, Finch SJ, Nothnagel M, Ott J: Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms. Human Heredity. 2002, 54: 22-33. 10.1159/000066696.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon D, Levenstien MA, Finch SJ, Ott J: Errors and linkage disequilibrium interact multiplicatively when computing sample sizes for genetic case-control association studies. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2003, 490-501.Google Scholar
  32. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68: 978-89. 10.1086/319501.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephens M, Donnelly PP: Comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 73: 1162-69. 10.1086/379378.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Dick DM, Rose RJ, Kaprio J: The next challenge for psychiatric genetics: characterizing the risk associated with identified genes. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006, 18: 223-31. 10.1080/10401230600948407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Blum K, Noble EP, Sheridan PJ, Montgomery A, Ritchie T, Jagadeeswaran P, Nogami H, Briggs AH, Cohn JB: Allelic association of human dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism. J Am Med Assoc. 1990, 263: 2055-60. 10.1001/jama.263.15.2055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Konishi T, Calvillo M, Leng AS, Lin KM, Wan YJ: Polymorphisms of the dopamine D2 receptor, serotonin transporter, and GABA(A) receptor beta(3) subunit genes and alcoholism in Mexican-Americans. Alcohol. 2004, 32: 45-52. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2003.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiesbeck GA, Dürsteler-MacFarland KM, Wurst FM, Walter M, Petitjean S, Müller S, Wodarz N, Böning J: No association of dopamine receptor sensitivity in vivo with genetic predisposition for alcoholism and DRD2/DRD3 gene polymorphisms in alcohol dependence. Addict Biol. 2006, 11: 72-75. 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00003.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jönsson EG, Nöthen MM, Grünhage F, Farde L, Nakashima Y, Propping P, Sedvall GC: Polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene and their relationships to striatal dopamine receptor density of healthy volunteers. Mol Psychiatry. 1999, 4: 290-96. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Samochowiec J, Ladehoff M, Pelz J, Smolka M, Schmidt LG, Rommelspacher H, Finckh U: Predominant influence of the 3'-region of dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) on the clinical phenotype in German alcoholics. Pharmacogenetics. 2000, 10: 471-5. 10.1097/00008571-200007000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Samochowiec J, Kucharska-Mazur J, Grzywacz A, Jabłoński M, Rommelspacher H, Samochowiec A, Sznabowicz M, Horodnicki J, Sagan L, Pełka-Wysiecka J: Family-based and case-control study of DRD2, DAT, 5HTT, COMT genes polymorphisms in alcohol dependence. Neurosci Lett. 2006, 410: 1-5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.05.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Johann M, Putzhammer A, Eichhammer P, Wodarz N: Association of the -141C Del variant of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) with positive family history and suicidality in German alcoholics. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005, 132B: 46-49. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirvonen MM, Lumme V, Hirvonen J, Pesonen U, Någren K, Vahlberg T, Scheinin H, Hietala J: C957T polymorphism of the human dopamine D2 receptor gene predicts extrastriatal dopamine receptor availability in vivo. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 33 (Suppl 4): 630-6. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.02.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Konishi T, Luo HR, Calvillo M, Mayo MS, Lin KM, Wan YJ: ADH1B*1, ADH1C*2, DRD2 (-141C Ins), and 5-HTTLPR are associated with alcoholism in Mexican American men living in Los Angeles. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004, 28: 1145-52. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000134231.48395.42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Neville MJ, Johnstone EC, Walton RT: Identification and characterization of ANKK1: a novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1. Hum Mutat. 2004, 23: 540-45. 10.1002/humu.20039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucht M, Barnow S, Schroeder W, Grabe HJ, Rosskopf D, Brummer C, John U, Freyberger HJ, Herrmann FH: Alcohol consumption is associated with an interaction between DRD2 exon 8 A/A genotype and self-directedness in males. Neuropsychobiology. 2007, 56: 24-31. 10.1159/000109974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Noble EP: The D2 dopamine receptor gene: a review of association studies in alcoholism and phenotypes. Alcohol. 1998, 16 (Suppl1): 33-45. 10.1016/S0741-8329(97)00175-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Laruelle M, Gelernter J, Innis RB: D2 receptors binding potential is not affected by TaqI polymorphism at the D2 receptor gene. Mol Psychiatry. 1998, 3: 261-65. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Munafo MR, Matheson IJ, Flint J: Association of the DRD2 gene TaqIA polymorphism and alcoholism: a meta-analysis of case-control studies and evidence of publication bias. Mol Psychiatry. 2007, 12: 454-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kidd KK, Morar B, Castiglione CM, Zhao H, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Bonne-Tamir B, Lu RB, Goldman D, Lee C, Nam YS, Grandy DK, Jenkins T, Kidd JR: A global survey of haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium at the DRD2 locus. Hum Genet. 1998, 103: 211-27. 10.1007/s004390050809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Prasad P, Thelma BK: Normative genetic profiles of some commonly investigated polymorphisms in candidate genes from north Indian and south Indian populations. Hum Biol. 2007, 79: 241-54. 10.1353/hub.2007.0033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/11/24/prepub

Copyright

© Prasad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement