Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of nine candidate genes in patients with normal tension glaucoma: a case control study

  • Christiane Wolf1,
  • Eugen Gramer2,
  • Bertram Müller-Myhsok3,
  • Francesca Pasutto4,
  • Eva Reinthal5,
  • Bernd Wissinger1 and
  • Nicole Weisschuh1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics200910:91

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-91

Received: 19 June 2009

Accepted: 15 September 2009

Published: 15 September 2009

Abstract

Background

Normal tension glaucoma is a major subtype of glaucoma, associated with intraocular pressures that are within the statistically normal range of the population. Monogenic forms following classical inheritance patterns are rare in this glaucoma subtype. Instead, multigenic inheritance is proposed for the majority of cases. The present study tested common sequence variants in candidate genes for association with normal tension glaucoma in the German population.

Methods

Ninety-eight SNPs were selected to tag the common genetic variation in nine genes, namely OPTN (optineurin), RDX (radixin), SNX16 (sorting nexin 16), OPA1 (optic atrophy 1), MFN1 (mitofusin 1), MFN2 (mitofusin 2), PARL (presenilin associated, rhomboid-like), SOD2 (superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial) and CYP1B1 (cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 1). These SNPs were genotyped in 285 cases and 282 fully evaluated matched controls. Statistical analyses comprised single polymorphism association as well as haplogroup based association testing.

Results

Results suggested that genetic variation in five of the candidate genes (RDX, SNX16, OPA1, SOD2 and CYP1B1) is unlikely to confer major risk to develop normal tension glaucoma in the German population. In contrast, we observed a trend towards association of single SNPs in OPTN, MFN1, MFN2 and PARL. The SNPs of OPTN, MFN2 and PARL were further analysed by multimarker haplotype-based association testing. We identified a risk haplotype being more frequent in patients and a vice versa situation for the complementary protective haplotype in each of the three genes.

Conclusion

Common variants of OPTN, PARL, MFN1 and MFN2 should be analysed in other cohorts to confirm their involvement in normal tension glaucoma.

Background

The term glaucoma describes a heterogeneous group of optic neuropathies. Yet progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and optic nerve axons, corresponding visual field loss and characteristic optic nerve head cupping is common in all forms of glaucoma. The three major risk factors for the development of glaucoma are elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), advanced age and a positive family history. It is estimated, that by 2010, 60 million people will suffer from glaucoma and that the disease will be the second leading cause of blindness worldwide [1].

Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most frequent of all glaucoma types. In approximately one third of all Caucasian POAG patients the IOP is within the average range of 10-21 mmHg. Nonetheless such patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) show typical pathological cupping of the optic nerve as well as characteristic visual field defects [2, 3].

First degree relatives of glaucoma patients have an elevated risk to develop glaucoma themselves, indicating that genetic risk factors are involved in the etiology of POAG.

Though at least 14 loci have been linked to POAG (GLC1A-GLC1N), only three causative genes have been identified to date: myocilin (MYOC/GLC1A), optineurin (OPTN/GLC1E), and WD repeat domain 36 (WDR36/GLC1G). Altogether, mutations in these three genes account for less than 10% of POAG cases [4]. In addition, association studies have implicated more than 20 other genes in POAG [5]. Most of these genes were investigated only in single studies whereas the OPA1 gene, which is linked to autosomal dominant optic atrophy, has been subject of multiple studies. However, results were contradictory [611].

Taken together, true monogenic forms following classical inheritance patterns are rare in POAG. It is therefore generally accepted that the majority of cases are most likely to evolve from multigenic inheritance, i.e. genes interacting synergistically to cause the condition [12].

Therefore, association studies may be suitable to unravel the genetic etiology of multigenic human diseases like glaucoma. The recent identification and replication of the LOXL1 gene as a risk factor for pseudoexfoliation glaucoma [13] clearly demonstrates the power of association studies in glaucoma research.

In the present study, we performed a case-control study to identify genetic risk factors for the development of NTG. A tagging single nucleotide polymorphism (tagSNP) approach based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks was used to determine the frequency of common sequence variants in nine candidate genes. The genes we analysed were OPTN (optineurin), RDX (radixin), SNX16 (sorting nexin 16), OPA1 (optic atrophy 1), MFN1 (mitofusin 1), MFN2 (mitofusin 2), PARL (presenilin associated, rhomboid-like), SOD2 (superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial) and CYP1B1 (cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 1).

Mutations in the OPTN gene were initially reported in 16.7% of families with hereditary POAG and NTG [14]. Follow-up studies in unselected cohorts however indicated that coding OPTN sequence variants are only a rare cause of POAG or NTG in different populations including our own German NTG cohort [1518]. This however does not rule out that other common gene variations in OPTN not yet investigated (e. g. in introns or noncoding flanking regions) may show up as risk associated variants in a case control study. In addition to OPTN we also considered RDX and SNX16, since both genes are linked with OPTN expression [19].

Mutations in the OPA1 gene are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant optic atrophy [20]. In addition, common sequence variants in the OPA1 gene have been associated with POAG or specifically NTG, though the findings could not be replicated in all populations [611]. In the present study, we extended the analysis by genotyping 16 common variants in the genomic region of the OPA1 gene.

Two genes that encode functional interaction partners of the OPA1 protein were also included in our study: MFN1, which acts in concert with OPA1 in the mitochondrial fission and fusion process [21], and PARL, which encodes a processing protease for OPA1 [2224]. We also analysed the MFN2 gene, as the MFN2 protein shows functional overlap with OPA1 [25].

The SOD2 gene encodes the Mn2 dependent superoxide dismutase that acts as a primary scavenger of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria. Oxidative stress is proposed to be involved in the etiology of glaucoma [26] and increased expression of the SOD2 gene was observed in the aqueous humor of glaucoma patients [27].

Mutations in the CYP1B1 gene cause an autosomal recessive form of primary congenital glaucoma [28] and two common sequence variants (Val432Leu and Asn453Ser) in the CYP1B1 gene are proposed to act as a risk factor for the development of POAG [29] and to influence clinical features like optic disk cupping and visual field deterioration in POAG patients [30]. Moreover, a very recent study showed that heterozygous CYP1B1 mutations with absent or reduced relative enzymatic activity are associated with POAG [31].

The goal of the present study was to determine whether common sequence variants in nine functionally defined candidate genes influence the risk to develop NTG in a large homogeneous patient cohort and would thus be worthy of more detailed examination.

Methods

Study samples

285 unrelated German patients with a diagnosis of NTG were recruited at the University Eye Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany. All patients were traced back to the third generation to reconfirm ethnicity. NTG was defined by (1) the presence of typical glaucomatous optic neuropathy with corresponding visual field loss, (2) open drainage angles on gonioscopy, (3) absence of a secondary cause for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, such as previously elevated IOP after trauma, a period of steroid administration or uveitis, and (4) IOP measures of untreated NTG continuously 21 mmHg or lower on repeated diurnal testing (five readings between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM). The median of readings was required to be 21 mm Hg or less, with no reading above 24 mm Hg and no more than one reading of 23 or 24 mm Hg. IOP readings were correlated with corneal thickness. Patients did not have evidence of high myopia or congenital ocular abnormality and had no other cause than glaucoma for disc changes and visual field loss. Disc size and parameters were evaluated by confocal examination (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph). To minimize interobserver variability, more than 95% of patients were examined by the same ophthalmologist. All patients had a long term follow-up to ensure diagnosis of NTG with a maximum of certainty. In large part, NTG patients underwent a neurological examination to exclude an intracerebral expansion. Sonography was used to rule out aortic stenosis.

The control cohort comprised 282 unrelated German individuals, matched with the patient cohort for age, gender distribution and geographical origin. Ophthalmic examination was performed in all control subjects, including IOP measurement and ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc, to ascertain an IOP in the normal range (<21 mmHG) and the absence of glaucomatous disc change. Controls had no family history of glaucoma.

This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Tuebingen, the University of Wuerzburg and the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg.

The average age of the patient group was 64.7 ± 13.9 years (controls: 66.9 ± 13.1 years) with a median of 67 years (controls: 68 years). Thirty-four percent of the NTG patients were male and 66% were female, while 41% of the controls were male and 59% were female.

Isolation of DNA, SNP selection and genotyping

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using the Magnetic Separation Module I from Chemagen using DNA chemistry (Chemagic DNA Blood Kit Special; Chemagen AG, Baesweiler, Germany).

Nine genes were investigated in this study, namely OPTN, RDX, SNX16, OPA1, MFN1, MFN2, PARL, SOD2 and CYP1B1.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks were defined using the algorithm by Gabriel and coworkers [32] implemented in Haploview [33] (version 4.1) on the HapMap31 CEPH (Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe) data. LD blocks covered the chromosomal regions of these genes extending to the neighbouring genes. TagSNPs capturing LD blocks were selected to define haplotypes having a frequency of at least 0.1 and a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.1 or higher. Additional non-tagging SNPs were genotyped in the OPA1 gene (rs166850 and rs10451941) and in the SOD2 gene (rs4880), respectively. For the CYP1B1 gene, only two coding SNPs were selected for genotyping (rs1056836 and rs1800440).

The number of SNPs genotyped in each gene is shown in Table 1. All SNPs were genotyped with TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Assay IDs and orientation of design strands are given in Additional file 1. Reactions were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and run on a sequence detection system (ABI 7500) using standard protocols. Sequence data was analysed using Sequence Detection Software version 1.2.3.
Table 1

Chromosomal regions of genotyped SNPs

Gene

CHR

included chromosomal region (bp)

number of genotyped SNPs

CYP1B1

2

64

2

MFN1

3

60496

5

MFN2

1

55573

4

OPA1

3

208893

16

OPTN

10

106314

29

PARL

3

109822

7

RDX

11

151216

14

SNX16

8

204923

11

SOD2

6

123647

10

CHR, chromosome; bp, basepairs

For quality-control reasons, 28 of the 98 TaqMan assays used in this study were selected randomly to confirm standard individual genotypes. Altogether, 1294 genotyping reactions were performed on 58 CEPH individuals. These CEPH individuals comprised 48 individuals that are identical with the triplets used in the HapMap [34] project and 10 additional members of one of the families. Genotyping results were checked for pedigree consistency and a cross comparison with HapMap data revealed a 100% concordance.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using PLINK [35] (version 1.05). The minimum genotyping rate for SNPs and individuals to be included in the statistical analyses was set to 90%.

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed by using an exact test. Case-control association testing of single SNPs was performed by logistic regression. Multiple comparisons of SNPs covering all investigated genes were corrected using the Bonferroni method.

Interaction of SNPs was analysed by an SNP × SNP epistasis test with subsequent correction for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni method. Haplotype-based case control association testing was assessed as implemented in PLINK.

Results

Ninety-eight SNPs were selected to tag the common genetic variation in OPTN, RDX, SNX16, OPA1, MFN1, MFN2, PARL, SOD2 and CYP1B1.

One of these (RDX: rs1676536) was excluded from further analysis due to a low genotyping rate. The remaining panel of SNPs was genotyped in a case-control study in 285 patients with NTG and 282 healthy controls of German origin. The average number of individuals remaining for analysis was 554.31 ± 2.5 (median 555) per SNP and the average genotyping rate in these individuals was 0.995 ± 0.007 (median 0.997). The size of the chromosomal regions and the number of SNPs genotyped in each gene are shown in Table 1. For all SNPs, genotype distributions in patients and controls were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

We found no evidence of association between NTG and RDX, SNX16, OPA1, SOD2 and CYP1B1. Entire allele frequencies and detailed results of the logistic regression of single SNP association testing are provided in Additional file 1.

We identified a nominally significant association of NTG with four SNPs in OPTN (rs10796021, rs3829923, rs7921853 and rs765884), three almost consecutive SNPs in the MFN2 gene (rs873458, rs2295281 and rs11588779), two close neighboring SNPs in PARL (rs1000002 and rs1402003) and one SNP in the MFN1 gene (rs2111534) (Table 2). Genewise case-control comparison of multimarker haplotypes derived from the SNPs in OPTN, MFN2 and PARL revealed two complementary common haplotypes for each gene. The differences of these haplotype frequencies between cases and controls were nominally significant (Table 3). In PARL, a very rare haplotype showed a nominal association with NTG (Table 3).
Table 2

Allele frequencies and summary statistics for significant SNPs before adjustment for multiple testing

Gene1

SNP

MA

MAF patients

MAF controls

OR

L95

U95

p

OPTN

rs10796021

C

0.471

0.405

1.316

1.022

1.695

0.033

OPTN

rs3829923

T

0.375

0.444

0.768

0.602

0.980

0.034

OPTN

rs7921853

T

0.498

0.415

1.356

1.069

1.721

0.012

OPTN

rs765884

C

0.315

0.224

1.558

1.179

2.059

1.838 × 10-3

MFN1

rs2111534

A

0.384

0.450

0,748

0.583

0.960

0.023

MFN2

rs873458

G

0.496

0.432

1.292

1.019

1.639

0.035

MFN2

rs2295281

C

0.493

0.423

1.327

1.044

1.687

0.021

MFN2

rs11588779

T

0.221

0.282

0.721

0.547

0.950

0.020

PARL

rs1000002

C

0.539

0.437

1.478

1.091

2.002

0.012

PARL

rs1402003

G

0.464

0.368

1.471

1.079

2.006

0.015

1Refers to the gene for which LD blocks were calculated. MA, minor allele; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; L95, confidence interval 95% lower bound; U95, confidence interval 95% upper bound

Table 3

Summary statistics on haplotype-based association

Gene

SNP identifiers and omnibus association

Haplotype

F patients

F controls

χ2

p

OPTN

rs10796021|rs3829923|rs7921853|rs765884

TTGT

0.257

0.327

5.905

0.015

 

pomnibus = 0.014

CCGT

0.125

0.142

0.590

0.443

 

χ2 omnibus = 23.67

TCTT

0.129

0.119

0.243

0.622

  

CCTC

0.187

0.093

18.170

2.021 × 10-5

  

TCTC

0.062

0.073

0.484

0.487

  

CCTT

0.072

0.070

0.019

0.890

  

CTGT

0.048

0.056

0.293

0.588

  

TTTT

0.036

0.040

0.083

0.773

  

TCGT

0.023

0.031

0.728

0.394

  

CCGC

0.029

0.029

0.003

0.959

  

CTTC

0.014

0.013

0.023

0.880

  

TTGC

0.018

0.009

1.611

0.204

MFN2

rs873458|rs2295281|rs11588779

ATC

0.410

0.420

0.1083

0.742

 

pomnibus = 0.018

GCC

0.359

0.286

6.541

0.011

 

χ2 omnibus = 11.97

ATT

0.091

0.147

8.334

3.891 × 10-3

  

GCT

0.131

0.135

0.039

0.843

  

GTC

0.009

0.011

0.099

0.753

PARL

rs1000002|rs1402003

TA

0.461

0.540

4.049

0.044

 

pomnibus = 7.619 × 10-4

CG

0.464

0.344

9.758

1.786 × 10-3

 

χ2 omnibus = 16.84

CA

0.075

0.093

0.7123

0.399

  

TG

0

0.023

8.480

3.590 × 10-3

F, frequency

For correcting data for multiple comparisons we also considered our previously performed association study with the same cohorts [36]. Since a p value of less than 4.808 × 10-4 was considered to be significant applying Bonferroni adjustment over the whole study, no significance of any single SNP association in any gene was further observed after correction for multiple comparisons. The epistasis test for interaction of SNPs revealed no significant result after correction for multiple testing (data not shown).

Discussion

There is a growing number of single gene or single variant based association studies in glaucoma. Our study based on the genotyping of tagSNPs to maximize genetic coverage of nine candidate genes (OPTN, RDX, SNX16, OPA1, MFN1, MFN2, PARL, SOD2 and CYP1B1). In total, we investigated 98 SNPs in 285 NTG patients and 282 controls and identified a trend towards association of NTG with common sequence variants of OPTN, MFN1, MFN2 and PARL.

No association study with RDX, SNX16 and SOD2 has been performed in glaucoma patients before. We hypothesized that genetic differences in these genes could confer risk to NTG since data from our previous work as well as from the literature point to a putative involvement of these genes in glaucoma related pathogenesis. However, our approach failed to find any association of NTG with any of the 35 examined SNPs in these genes suggesting that genetic variants at these loci are not of high relevance in the development of NTG in German patients.

In patients with NTG, the appearance of the optic nerve head is similar to that in autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA) [37]. These similarities make OPA1, the major gene involved in ADOA [20], an excellent candidate gene for glaucoma, particularly NTG. Several studies showed an association of two intron 8 polymorphisms (rs166850 and rs10451941) in the OPA1 gene with NTG in Caucasians [6, 7]. These studies were based on relatively small sample sizes comprising 61 to 83 patients. A more comprehensive study with 279 Caucasian POAG patients reported a lack of association similar to our findings [11]. As we did not only genotype SNPs rs166850 and rs10451941 but 14 additional SNPs within a 209 kb region encompassing the OPA1 gene, our results are more conclusive since we cover the genetic population variability of the entire OPA1 gene. Considering patient number and cohort homogeneity as well as the size of the analysed OPA1 region, our study is the most comprehensive one on this matter to date.

Mutations in the CYP1B1 gene are a frequent cause of primary congenital glaucoma. In addition, two common coding polymorphisms in this gene might contribute to the development of POAG. The Leu432Val variant (rs1056836) is associated with POAG in Indian patients [29] and the Asn453Ser (rs1800440) variant that is not directly associated with disease but with clinical features like optic disk cupping and visual field deterioration in French POAG patients [30]. We were not able to indentify an association of either of these two SNPs with NTG in our cohort. These conflicting findings may result from phenotypic differences (e.g. IOP level) between NTG and POAG. Inconsistent results may also be due to the large variability of CYP1B1 allele frequency distribution among different populations or the modest proportion of controls among the total number of samples in the previous studies [29, 30].

The association of OPTN, PARL, MFN1 and MFN2 common sequence variants we observed justifies a more extensive analysis. The single SNP associations observed before adjustment for multiple comparisons are supported by multimarker haplotype-based associations that we found for OPTN, MFN2 and PARL. In each of the three genes, we identified a nominally significant risk haplotype being more frequent in patients and a vice versa situation for the complementary protective haplotype, both being present at common frequencies in either cohort. The relative risk for homozygous individuals of the OPTN risk haplotype which showed the strongest of all associations is 8.905 (95% CI: 1.477-54.313).

OPTN is one of three causative genes that have been linked to POAG [14]. Nonetheless, more than 25 studies dealing with the impact of OPTN coding and flanking intronic variants on glaucoma show that disease-causing sequence alterations are rare in POAG/NTG patients and families. However, the OPTN gene may be a risk factor in multigenic inheritance as synergistic effects with the two other POAG genes myocilin and WD repeat domain 36 have been suggested [3840]. Yet, the mechanistic involvement of OPTN in glaucoma pathogenesis remains elusive. No case-control association study based on common gene variants has been performed for the complete chromosomal region of OPTN to date. Our study implicates that apart from OPTN mutations observed in monogenic inheritance of glaucoma also OPTN common allelic variants may influence an individual's susceptibility for developing NTG in a multigenic inheritance pattern.

MFN1 and MFN2 are nuclear encoded mitochondrial membrane proteins that interact with each other to facilitate mitochondrial targeting. MFN2 and OPA1 act in concert and conduct complementary functions in maintaining balance of mitochondrial fusion and fission events in the highly dynamic mitochondrial network architecture processes [25, 41, 42]. Likewise, PARL is a nuclear encoded mitochondrial protein and has been suggested to participate in OPA1 processing and apoptotic processes by regulation of cytochrome c release via OPA1-dependent cristae remodeling [22, 43].

A possible involvement of mitochondrial function in mechanisms of glaucoma development has been indicated before [4446]. According to the common disease-common variant hypothesis, multiple variants may each contribute a small additive or multiplicative effect to the disease phenotype. As mentioned above, the nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes OPA1, MFN1, MFN2 and PARL share functional overlap and/or are involved in joint mitochondrial pathways. However, we were not able to detect any significant interaction based on a SNP × SNP epistasis test between any of our nine potential candidate genes.

Most of the SNPs we analysed are located in intronic or intergenic regions, but may be in LD with functional coding or regulatory sequence variants. Considering our recruitment policy, we expect a highly homogeneous cohort as we applied strict diagnostic criteria. In addition, the ethnicity of all of our patients was traced back to the third generation. Therefore, we expect only small population admixture when comparing our cohort with such comprising a more genetically heterogeneous background (like for example the Unites States). As the homogeneity of a population corresponds with the persistence of LD between a genetic marker and a disease gene, the power to detect an association is higher in homogeneous populations. The homogeneity of our samples therefore may compensate in part for the small number of individuals. However, we are aware of the fact that our study is not well-powered for statistical testing. A retrospective power calculation based upon an OR of 1.558 (for SNP rs765884 which showed the strongest association) indicated that this study was sufficiently powered (91,8%; α = 0.05) to detect an effect of this magnitude or greater before correction for multiple comparisons. After Bonferroni correction, the power was considerably reduced (24,3%; α = 0.05).

Conclusion

The objective of this study was to investigate association of several genes that have not been subject to an association study with glaucoma cases so far but might be functionally linked to glaucoma pathogenesis (RDX, SNX16, MFN1, MFN2, PARL, SOD2). In addition, we analysed genes that have been previously identified as candidate genes in glaucoma (OPTN, OPA1, CYP1B1). Whereas we could not detect any association of NTG with RDX, SNX16, OPA1, SOD2 and CYP1B1, our study revealed a trend towards association of NTG with common sequence variants of OPTN, MFN1, MFN2 and PARL, the latter three ones being involved in mitochondrial function.

Although our sample sizes are among the largest investigated in NTG so far, it is important to point out that the power of our study is still relatively limited. As we cannot fully exclude type one or type two errors, it is essential to replicate our findings in independent cohorts.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Molecular Genetics Laboratory
(2)
University Eye Hospital, Julius-Maximilians-University
(3)
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
(4)
Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg
(5)
Centre for Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital

References

  1. Quigley HA, Broman AT: The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006, 90 (3): 262-267. 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hitchings RA: Low-tension glaucoma: its place in modern glaucoma practice. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992, 76 (8): 494-496. 10.1136/bjo.76.8.494.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Werner EB: Normal tension glaucoma. The Glaucomas. Edited by: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. 1996, St. Louis: Mosby, 769-797. 2Google Scholar
  4. Fan BJ, Wang DY, Lam DS, Pang CP: Gene mapping for primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Biochem. 2006, 39: 249-258. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Allingham RR, Liu Y, Rhee DJ: The genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma: a review. Exp Eye Res. 2009, 88: 837-844. 10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aung T, Ocaka L, Ebenezer ND, Morris AG, Krawczak M, Thiselton DL, Alexander C, Votruba M, Brice G, Child AH, et al: A major marker for normal tension glaucoma: association with polymorphisms in the OPA1 gene. Hum Genet. 2002, 110 (1): 52-56. 10.1007/s00439-001-0645-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Powell BL, Toomes C, Scott S, Yeung A, Marchbank NJ, Spry PG, Lumb R, Inglehearn CF, Churchill AJ: Polymorphisms in OPA1 are associated with normal tension glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2003, 9: 460-464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Woo SJ, Kim DM, Kim JY, Park SS, Ko HS, Yoo T: Investigation of the association between OPA1 polymorphisms and normal-tension glaucoma in Korea. J Glaucoma. 2004, 13 (6): 492-495. 10.1097/01.ijg.0000137870.25779.40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yao W, Jiao X, Hejtmancik JF, Leske MC, Hennis A, Nemesure B, Barbados Family Study Group: Evaluation of the association between OPA1 polymorphisms and primary open-angle glaucoma in Barbados families. Mol Vis. 2006, 12: 649-654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mabuchi F, Tang S, Kashiwagi K, Yamagata Z, Iijima H, Tsukahara S: The OPA1 gene polymorphism is associated with normal tension and high tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007, 143 (1): 125-130. 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Y, Schmidt S, Qin X, Gibson J, Munro D, Wiggs JL, Hauser MA, Allingham RR: No association between OPA1 polymorphisms and primary open-angle glaucoma in three different populations. Mol Vis. 2007, 13: 2137-2141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gong G, Kosoko-Lasaki S, Haynatzki G, Lynch HT, Lynch JA, Wilson MR: Inherited, familial and sporadic primary open-angle glaucoma. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007, 99 (5): 559-563.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, Sulem P, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson H, Jonsson T, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Stefansdottir G, et al: Common sequence variants in the LOXL1 gene confer susceptibility to exfoliation glaucoma. Science. 2007, 317 (5843): 1397-1400. 10.1126/science.1146554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, Brice G, Miller L, Coca-Prados M, Héon E, Krupin T, Ritch R, Kreutzer D, et al: Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002, 295 (5557): 1077-1079. 10.1126/science.1066901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsman E, Lemmelä S, Varilo T, Kristo P, Forsius H, Sankila EM, Järvelä I: The role of TIGR and OPTN in Finnish glaucoma families: a clinical and molecular genetic study. Mol Vis. 2003, 9: 217-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tang S, Toda Y, Kashiwagi K, Mabuchi F, Iijima H, Tsukahara S, Yamagata Z: The association between Japanese primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients and the optineurin gene. Hum Genet. 2003, 113 (3): 276-279. 10.1007/s00439-003-0964-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiggs JL, Auguste J, Allingham RR, Flor JD, Pericak-Vance MA, Rogers K, LaRocque KR, Graham FL, Broomer B, Del Bono E, et al: Lack of association of mutations in optineurin with disease in patients with adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003, 121 (8): 1181-1183. 10.1001/archopht.121.8.1181.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Weisschuh N, Neumann D, Wolf C, Wissinger B, Gramer E: Prevalence of myocilin and optineurin sequence variants in German normal tension glaucoma patients. Mol Vis. 2005, 11: 284-287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weisschuh N, Alavi MV, Bonin M, Wissinger B: Identification of genes that are linked with optineurin expression using a combined RNAi-microarray approach. Exp Eye Res. 2007, 85 (4): 450-461. 10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Alexander C, Votruba M, Pesch UE, Thiselton DL, Mayer S, Moore A, Rodriguez M, Kellner U, Leo-Kottler B, Auburger G, et al: OPA1, encoding a dynamin-related GTPase, is mutated in autosomal dominant optic atrophy linked to chromosome 3q28. Nat Genet. 2000, 26 (2): 211-215. 10.1038/79944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cipolat S, Martins de Brito O, Dal Zilio B, Scorrano L: OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (45): 15927-15932. 10.1073/pnas.0407043101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Cipolat S, Rudka T, Hartmann D, Costa V, Serneels L, Craessaerts K, Metzger K, Frezza C, Annaert W, D'Adamio L, et al: Mitochondrial rhomboid PARL regulates cytochrome c release during apoptosis via OPA1-dependent cristae remodeling. Cell. 2006, 126 (1): 163-175. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Duvezin-Caubet S, Koppen M, Wagener J, Zick M, Israel L, Bernacchia A, Jagasia R, Rugarli EI, Imhof A, Neupert W, et al: OPA1 processing reconstituted in yeast depends on the subunit composition of the m-AAA protease in mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18 (9): 3582-3590. 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Guillery O, Malka F, Landes T, Guillou E, Blackstone C, Lombès A, Belenguer P, Arnoult D, Rojo M: Metalloprotease-mediated OPA1 processing is modulated by the mitochondrial membrane potential. Biol Cell. 2008, 100 (5): 315-325. 10.1042/BC20070110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC: Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 2003, 160 (2): 189-200. 10.1083/jcb.200211046.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Tezel G: Oxidative stress in glaucomatous neurodegeneration: mechanisms and consequences. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006, 25 (5): 490-513. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.07.003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferreira SM, Lerner SF, Brunzini R, Evelson PA, Llesuy SF: Oxidative stress markers in aqueous humor of glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004, 137 (1): 62-9. 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00788-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stoilov I, Akarsu AN, Sarfarazi M: Identification of three different truncating mutations in cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) as the principal cause of primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) in families linked to the GLC3A locus on chromosome 2p21. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6 (4): 641-647. 10.1093/hmg/6.4.641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhattacharjee A, Banerjee D, Mookherjee S, Acharya M, Banerjee A, Ray A, Sen A, Variation Consortium TI, Ray K: Leu432Val polymorphism in CYP1B1 as a susceptible factor towards predisposition to primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 841-850.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Melki R, Lefort N, Brézin AP, Garchon HJ: Association of a common coding polymorphism (N453S) of the cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) gene with optic disc cupping and visual field alteration in French patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2005, 11: 1012-1017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pasutto F, Chavarria-Soley G, Mardin CY, Michels-Rautenstrauss K, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Fernández-Martínez L, Weber BH, Rautenstrauss B, Reis A: Heterozygous loss of function variants in CYP1B1 predispose to primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009,Google Scholar
  32. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M, et al: The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002, 296 (5576): 2225-2229. 10.1126/science.1069424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. The International HapMap Consortium: The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003, 426 (6968): 789-796. 10.1038/nature02168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, et al: PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 81 (3): 559-575. 10.1086/519795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf C, Gramer E, Müller-Myhsok B, Pasutto F, Gramer G, Wissinger B, Weisschuh N: Lysyl Oxidase-like 1 Gene Polymorphisms in German Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma, Pigmentary Glaucoma and Exfoliation Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009,Google Scholar
  37. Votruba M, Thiselton D, Bhattacharya SS: Optic disc morphology of patients with OPA1 autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003, 87 (1): 48-53. 10.1136/bjo.87.1.48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Fan BJ, Wang DY, Fan DS, Tam PO, Lam DS, Tham CC, Lam CY, Lau TC, Pang CP: SNPs and interaction analyses of myocilin, optineurin, and apolipoprotein E in primary open angle glaucoma patients. Mol Vis. 2005, 11: 625-631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Park BC, Tibudan M, Samaraweera M, Shen X, Yue BY: Interaction between two glaucoma genes, optineurin and myocilin. Genes cells. 2007, 12 (8): 969-979. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01102.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jia LY, Tam PO, Chiang SW, Ding N, Chen LJ, Yam GH, Pang CP, Wang NL: Multiple gene polymorphisms analysis revealed a different profile of genetic polymorphisms of primary open-angle glaucoma in northern Chinese. Mol Vis. 2009, 15: 89-98.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Bossy-Wetzel E, Barsoum MJ, Godzik A, Schwarzenbacher R, Lipton SA: Mitochondrial fission in apoptosis, neurodegeneration and aging. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003, 15 (6): 706-716. 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Westermann B: Mitochondrial membrane fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1641: 195-202. 10.1016/S0167-4889(03)00091-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pellegrini L, Scorrano L: A cut short to death: Parl and Opa1 in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14 (7): 1275-1284. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Abu-Amero KK, Morales J, Bosley TM: Mitochondrial abnormalities in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47 (6): 2533-2541. 10.1167/iovs.05-1639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tezel G: Oxidative stress in glaucomatous neurodegeneration: mechanisms and consequences. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006, 25 (5): 490-513. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.07.003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kong GY, Van Bergen NJ, Trounce IA, Crowston JG: Mitochondrial dysfunction and glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009, 18 (2): 93-100. 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318181284f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/10/91/prepub

Copyright

© Wolf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement