Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Molecular analysis of the APC and MUTYH genes in Galician and Catalonian FAP families: a different spectrum of mutations?

  • Nuria Gómez-Fernández1,
  • Sergi Castellví-Bel2,
  • Ceres Fernández-Rozadilla1,
  • Francesc Balaguer2,
  • Jenifer Muñoz1,
  • Irene Madrigal3,
  • Montserrat Milà3,
  • Begoña Graña4,
  • Ana Vega1,
  • Antoni Castells2,
  • Ángel Carracedo1 and
  • Clara Ruiz-Ponte1Email author
BMC Medical Genetics200910:57

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-57

Received: 11 December 2008

Accepted: 16 June 2009

Published: 16 June 2009

Abstract

Background

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant-inherited colorectal cancer syndrome, caused by germline mutations in the APC gene. Recently, biallelic mutations in MUTYH have also been identified in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas and in APC-negative patients with FAP. The aim of this work is therefore to determine the frequency of APC and MUTYH mutations among FAP families from two Spanish populations.

Methods

Eighty-two unrelated patients with classical or attenuated FAP were screened for APC germline mutations. MUTYH analysis was then conducted in those APC-negative families and in 9 additional patients from a previous study. Direct sequencing, SSCP analysis and TaqMan genotyping were used to identify point and frameshift mutations, meanwhile large rearrangements in the APC gene were screened by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Results

APC germline mutations were found in 39% of the patients and, despite the great number of genetic variants described so far in this gene, seven new mutations were identified. The two hotspots at codons 1061 and 1309 of the APC gene accounted for 9,4% of the APC-positive families, although they were underrepresented in Galician samples. The deletion at codon 1061 was not found in 19 APC-positive Galician patients but represented 23% of the Catalonian positive families (p = 0,058). The same trend was observed at codon 1309, even though statistical analysis showed no significance between populations. Twenty-four percent of the APC-negative patients carried biallelic MUTYH germline mutations, and showed an attenuated polyposis phenotype generally without extracolonic manifestations. New genetic variants were found, as well as the two hotspots already reported (p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp).

Conclusion

The results we present indicate that in Galician patients the frequency of the hotspot at codon 1061 in APC differs significantly from the Catalonian and also other Caucasian populations. Similar results had already been obtained in a previous study and could be due to the genetic isolation of the Galician population. MUTYH analysis is also recommended for all APC-negative families, even if a recessive inheritance is not confirmed.

Background

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP; OMIM#175100) is a rare autosomal dominant colorectal cancer predisposition syndrome, characterised by the presence of hundreds to thousands of adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum from an early age. In the absence of prophylactic surgery, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the inevitable consequence of FAP. Extracolonic manifestations such as osteomas, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE), desmoid tumors, sebaceous cysts, hepatoblastoma, upper gastrointestinal tumors or thyroid carcinoma are also associated with FAP [1]. Attenuated FAP (AFAP) is a clinical variant characterised by the presence of fewer than 100 colonic polyps, and often has a later age of onset of polyposis and CRC [2].

The genetic basis of most cases of FAP is a germline mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene (5q21), which encodes a tumor suppressor protein involved in regulation of cell proliferation and chromosome segregation [3]. About 90% of the germline mutations in FAP result in truncation of the APC protein and are mainly located within exon 15 [4]. In AFAP, germline mutations have been generally detected either in exon 9 or the 5' and 3' ends of the gene [5].

It is known that APC germline mutations are not present in approximately 10–30% of FAP patients and in up to 90% of AFAP patients [6]. Recently, patients with multiple colorectal adenomas and also patients with FAP but without detectable germline APC mutations have been found to carry biallelic mutations in the base-excision-repair gene MUTYH (MYH) [7]. This base excision repair (BER) pathway is necessary to repair DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species. The DNA glycosylase MUTYH removes adenines from mispairs with 8-oxoguanine that occur during the replication of oxidized DNA. Failure to correct these mispairs consequently leads to G:C→T:A tranversion mutations in tumors that resulted in the discovery of MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), which shows an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern [8]. Two mutational hotspots have been so far identified in the MUTYH gene: p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp, accounting for approximately 78% of the mutations identified in affected Caucasians [9].

In this study, we examined the mutational spectrum of the APC gene in patients with polyposis from two Spanish populations, and also the contribution of MUTYH germline mutations in those APC-negative patients.

Methods

Patients and DNA isolation

The sample studied consisted of 82 unrelated cases with FAP (>100 colorectal adenomas) or AFAP (5–100 colorectal adenomas). All the patients were included in the study based on colonoscopic findings and/or positive family history. Forty-eight samples were submitted for mutation analysis at the Galician Public Foundation of Genomic Medicine (FPGMX) from health centers across Galicia, and 34 were attended in the at-risk clinic for CRC of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona. Written informed consent was obtained for each patient before mutation analysis, according to the protocols approved by the ethics review boards of the Hospitals and in compliance with the Helsinki declaration.

All patients were screened for APC germline mutations, and when negative, MUTYH was analysed. MUTYH was also studied in 9 APC-negative families included in a previous article [10].

Clinical features for patients with detected mutations, including age of onset, number of adenomas, colorectal cancer diagnosis, extracolonic diseases and family history, if present, are listed in Tables 1 (APC) [5, 1020] and 2 (MUTYH) [7, 8, 21, 22].
Table 1

Phenotypic features and germline mutations identified in APC-positive patients.

Patient ID

Onset age

Number of Adenomas

CRC

ED

Family history (age at diagnosis)

Mutation

Exon

Ref

GAL-27

42

>100

No

No

Father: CRC(36) Grandmother: CRC(60)

c.(?_30)_(*220_?)del

Whole allele

[11]

GAL-16

23

100

No

DT OST

NA

c.(?_30)_(*220_?)del

Whole allele

[11]

GAL-14

20

>100

No

?

No

c. 1-?_8532+?del

1 to 15

[12]

GAL-07

50

15

No

No

Affected mother (?)

c.147-150 del ACAA (p.Lys49Asn fs X20)

2

This study

GAL-15

33

>100

No

?

No

c.423-?_531+?del

4

[5]

GAL-11

41

>100

Yes

No

Father: CRC (?)

c.646C>T (p.Arg216X)

6

[13]

GAL-26

15

>100

No

No

Father: FAP+CRC (47)

c.646 C>T (p.Arg216X)

6

[13]

GAL-09

33

12

No

No

No

c.994C>T (p.Arg332X)

9

[5]

GAL-10

64

50

Yes

No

Mother: CRC (68) Aunt: CRC (60)

c.1072C>T (p.Gln358X)

9

[14]

GAL-19

NA

20–50

No

No

Mother: CRC (46)

c.1402 G>T (p.Glu468X)

10

This study

GAL-13

20

>100

Yes

No

No

c.1620_1621dupA (p.Gln541ThrfsX19)

12

[15]

GAL-18

33

>50

No

No

Father: CRC (42)

c.1682dupA (p.Thr562AsnfsX19)

13

[10]

GAL-02

30

0

No

PC

No

c.1756 A>T (p.Lys586X)

14

[16]

GAL-01

23

<100

No

No

Brother: FAP (20s)

c.2413C>T (p.Arg805X)

15

[17]

GAL-17

41

100

Yes

OST

Father CRC (45), Sister CRC (34)

c.2900 del T (p.Val967Ala fs X13)

15

This study

GAL-12

34

<100

No

No

Father: CRC (40s) Uncle: CRC (40s) Grandfather: CRC(40s)

c.3467_3470delAAGA (p.Glu1156GlyfsX8)

15

[18]

GAL-24

52

>100

No

CHRPE

No

c.3927_3931delAAAGA (p.Glu1309AspfsX4)

15

[18]

GAL-04

60

>100

Yes

Others

No

c.4033G>T (p.Glu1345X)

15

[19]

GAL-25

43

>100

Yes

No

NA

c.4219-4220 del AG p.Ser1407X fs X1

15

This study

CAT-12

21

>100

No

No

Mother: FAP+ CRC (49) Sister: FAP (31)

c.(?_30)_(*220_?)del

Whole allele

[11]

CAT-13

20

20–50

No

No

Father: FAP (?) Brother: FAP (?)

c.423-?_531+?del

4

[5]

CAT-01

46

100

Yes

No

Brother: CRC+FAP(53) Brother: CRC+FAP(59)

c.994C>T (p.Arg332X)

9

[5]

CAT-02

32

>100

No

DP

No

c.2934_2935 del AA (p.Gln978His fs X6)

15

This study

CAT-03

38

40–60

No

DT

Father: CRC (46) Brother: FAP

c.3183_3187delACAAA (p.Lys1061LysfsX2)

15

[18]

CAT-04

20

>100

No

No

Mother: FAP + CRC (?) Cousin: CRC (52)

c.3183_3187delACAAA (p.Lys1061LysfsX2)

15

[18]

CAT-05

39

>100

No

DT

Sister: FAP (41)

c.3183_3187delACAAA (p.Lys1061LysfsX2)

15

[18]

CAT-06

38

>100

Yes

No

Brother: FAP Father: FAP + CRC (?)

c.3329C>A (p.Ser1110X)

15

This study

CAT-07

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

c.3329C>A (p.Ser1110X)

15

This study

CAT-08

27

>100

No

No

Brother: FAP (29) Father: FAP (41) Grandmother: FAP(30)

c.3531 del T (p.Ile1177Met fs X5)

15

This study

CAT-09

NA

NA

NA

DP

NA

c.3631_3632delAT (p.Met1211ValfsX5)

15

[20]

CAT-10

17

>100

No

FGP

Father: FAP (39) Uncle: FAP + CRC (?)

c.3927_3931delAAAGA (p.Glu1309AspfsX4)

15

[18]

CAT-11

32

>100

No

FGP

Father: FAP (39)

Uncle FAP + CRC(63).

Aunt: FAP+ CRC(55)

Grandmother: FAP+CRC(39)

c.3927_3931delAAAGA (p.Glu1309AspfsX4)

15

[18]

ED: extracolonic disease; DT: desmoid tumor; OST: osteomas; NA: not available; PC: papillary carcinoma; CHRPE: congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigmented epitelium; Others: Ovarian tumor and suprarenal adenoma; DP: duodenal polyps; FGP: fundic gland polyps.

Table 2

Phenotypic characteristics and germlime mutations identified in biallelic MUTYH carriers.

Patient ID

Onset age

Number of adenomas

CRC

ED

Family History (age at diagnosis)

MUTYH

Ref.

      

1st Mutation

2nd mutation

 

GAL-08

43

25–30

Yes

No

No

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

[7]

GAL-21

52

<100

No

No

No

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

GAL-22

NA

40–60

No

No

Two siblings and mother: CRC (50s)

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

GAL-05

58

<100

Yes

No

NA

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

GAL-06

NA

40–100

No

No

Sister: AFAP (?)

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

GAL-20

45

<100

No

No

Two siblings: AFAP+CRC (?)

c.1131 C>T (p.Gln377X)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7, 21]

GAL-03

44

31–100

Yes

No

No

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

GAL-23

62

>30

Yes

No

No

c.1186_1187insGG p.Glu396GlyfsX43

c.1186_1187insGG p.Glu396GlyfsX43

[22]

CAT-15

44

5

Yes

No

Mother: BC(66) Brother:2 CRC (46)

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1103delC (p.Ala369AlafsX26)

[7, 8]

CAT-14

38

15–30

No

No

Father: CRC (?)

c.494A>G (p.Tyr165Cys)

c.1145 G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

CAT-17

60

>20

Yes

No

NA

c.1145G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

c.1145G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

CAT-16

45

40–50

No

No

Father: CRC (40)

c.1145G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

c.1145G>A (p.Gly382Asp)

[7]

CAT-18

45

70

Yes

No

No

c.1186_1187insGG (p.Glu396GlyfsX43)

c.1186_1187insGG (p.Glu396GlyfsX43)

[22]

CAT-19

69

0

Yes

BC (59)

Cousin: CRC (40)

c.1186_1187insGG p.Glu396GlyfsX43

c.1186_1187insGG p.Glu396GlyfsX43

[22]

ED: Extracolonic disease; BC: Breast cancer; NA: not available.

To allow comparison of our results, we used the MUTYH sequence used by previous authors (GenBank accession number: U63329) instead of the actual reference sequence (GenBank accession number: NM_012222), which has 11 additional codons in exon 3.

Genomic DNA from Galician and Catalonian samples was obtained from peripheral blood using the Wizard DNA extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI), and the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) respectively. Protocols were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Analysis of the APC gene

Sequence variants

Exonic and intronic splice-site defining regions were amplified for the APC gene. PCR conditions for exon 15 had already been described [10], whereas for exons 1–14, new primers were designed using the Primer3 software [23] in order to cover larger intronic regions [see Additional file 1].

Galician samples were analysed by direct DNA sequencing at the FPGMX. For the Catalonian samples, single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis was performed at Hospital Clinic as an initial screening, as described [24]. Amplification products larger than 350 bp were previously digested with a suitable restriction enzyme. Any fragment showing a mobility shift was sequenced in order to identify the variant. Sequencing was performed in forward and reverse orientations using the BigDye terminator v.3.1. cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Genomic rearrangements

Large genomic rearrangements of the APC gene were evaluated with the APC multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) kit [25], and performed according to the supplied protocol (SALSA MLPA KIT P043 APC, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The amplicons were analysed in an ABI 3730 sequencer using GeneMapper v3.7 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Peak heights of each fragment were compared to those of a control sample, and deletions or duplications were suspected when peak height differed by over 30%. Control DNA samples with known genomic rearrangements in APC were included in each batch of experiments. Positive results of large rearrangements were repeated in an independent assay and subsequently confirmed by other methods (FISH, cDNA analysis).

APC FISH

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed with RP11-3B10 and RP11-619D06 clones mapping in 5q21-q22. BAC clones were purchased from the BAC/PAC Resources of the Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI, Oakland, CA). Equal amounts of BAC DNA (200 ng) were labelled with Spectrum Orange (RP11-3B10) and Spectrum Green (RP11-619D06) by a standard nick-translation (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA). This dual color probe was used to hybridize preparations of fixed cell nuclei and metaphases. Slides were visualized under an epi?uorescence microscope (Leica DMRXA). Images were captured by using a COHU camera and analysed with the Cytovision Ultra Workstation (Applied Imaging, Sunderland, UK).

RT-PCR

mRNA was isolated from blood using RNeasy® Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed with SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). cDNA was then amplified using primers located in the adjacent exons to those regions potentially deleted. A positive cDNA control was included in every PCR. Amplification products were sequenced in an ABI3730 analyser.

Analysis of the MUTYH gene

For every patient without detectable pathogenic mutations in APC, all MUTYH exons and their adjacent intronic splice sites were amplified using primers designed with the Primer3 software [23] [see Additional file 2].

Galician samples were analysed at the FPGMX center by sequencing each amplification fragment, as described above for the APC gene. Real-time PCR using Taqman probes, and SSCP analysis were performed for Catalonian samples at the Hospital Clinic. TaqMan genotyping included the analysis of the two most common mutations found to date in the MUTYH gene: p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp, as well as the two rare mutations c.1103delC and c.1186_1187insGG identified in our previous study [26]. This technique is based on allelic discrimination using allele-specific probes resolved on a 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Mutation nomenclature

All mutations were described following the guidelines proposed by the Human Genome Sequence Variation (HGSV) site and were referred to the cDNA sequences of APC (NM_000038) and MUTYH (U63329). Furthermore, all mutations were confirmed in two independent DNA extractions.

Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS)

We examined 500 chromosomes from control individuals with no personal or family history of colorectal cancer, in order to estimate the frequency of VUS. Analysis was carried out by direct DNA sequencing (see above).

Polyphen software was used to test the potential role of missense variants. This prediction program is based on observed substitutions of the residues in homologous proteins [27].

Statistical analyses

Ji-squared statistics with Fisher's correction were used to test for differences in APC and MUTYH mutation frequencies between the Galician and the Catalonian populations. Comparisons were also made for mutation frequencies at codons 1061 and 1309 of the APC gene. All statistics were estimated with the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL).

Results and Discussion

APCmutations

In this study, germline mutations in APC were found in 39% (32 out of 82) of the Spanish patients with FAP. Frameshift and nonsense mutations were the most frequently identified, and despite the great number of genetic variants described to date in the APC gene, seven new pathogenic mutations and two new VUS were reported. Clinical features displayed by APC-positive patients are shown on Table 1.

Five new frameshift mutations were identified: c.147_150delACAA (p.Lys49AsnfsX20),c.2900delT(p.Val967AlafsX13),c.2934_2935delAA(p.Gln978HisfsX6),c.3531delT(Ile1177MetfsX5) and c.4219_4220delAG (p.Ser1407XfsX1) in patients GAL-07, GAL-17, CAT-02, CAT-08 and GAL-25, respectively. All of these mutations were deletions of few nucleotides, that give rise to premature stop codons (X) which would lead to truncated APC proteins. We also identified two additional nonsense mutations that generate premature stop codons: c.1402 G>T (p.Glu468X) in patient GAL-19, and c.3329C>A (p.Ser1110X) in two unrelated patients (CAT-06 and CAT-07).

The two new VUS: c.3165A>G (p.Ile1055Met) and c.5357G>C (p.Arg1786Thr), were found in GAL-47 and GAL-35. Both patients displayed an attenuated FAP phenotype with an onset at around forty. These variants were not detected in 500 chromosomes from a healthy control population. However, their absence from the control group cannot be taken as prove of a deleterious effect. In silico studies using Polyphen revealed the p.Arg1786Thr as "possibly damaging", while the p.Ile1055Met was reported as "benign". In these families it was not possible to study the co-segregation with the disease, so further functional studies are necessary to consider them deleterious.

Large genomic deletions were found in 11% (6/56) of the families that tested APC mutation-negative by conventional techniques. This frequency is consistent with published data that comprise a range between 8–12% for such rearrangements [11, 12, 28]. Three different deletions were detected in 6 unrelated families: two exon 4 deletions (CAT-13 and GAL-15), an exon 1–15 deletion (GAL-14), and 3 whole-gene deletions (including the promoter) (CAT-12, GAL-27 and GAL-16). All of them were further confirmed by either cDNA studies (Figure 1) or FISH analysis (Figure 2).
Figure 1

cDNA analysis of the APC exon 4 deletion confirming the results obtained by MLPA. A. forward reference sequence; B. forward sequence with exon 4 deletion; C. reverse reference sequence; D. reverse sequence with exon 4 deletion; E. Nucleotidic and aminoacidic sequences showing the effect of the exon 4 deletion, which results in a frameshift that creates a stop codon at residue 442.

Figure 2

Whole APC gene deletion detected by MLPA and FISH analysis. A. Electropherograms of MLPA products showing a normal control and a deletion of the whole APC gene. B. FISH studies on metaphase spreads with clones RP11-3B10 (red probe) and RP11-619D06 (green probe) that map within the deletion, on the patient and a healthy sister. C. Physical mapping position, according to the hg17 assembly of the UCSC http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway of clones mapping the 5q21-22 region.

Carriers of whole allelic deletions generally displayed a severe polyposis phenotype with an early onset of symptoms, as previously described [11]. A correlation between site of mutation and clinical phenotype was also observed for six of the seven new mutations identified. Mutations occurring at the beginning and middle of exon 15 were generally associated with a more severe phenotype than those located at the 5' and 3' ends of the gene, which is consistent with other studies [29]. Although mutations in exon 10 would then be associated with FAP, p.Glu468X was found in a patient classified as AFAP based on number of polyps (GAL-19) (Table 1).

Phenotypic differences about number of adenomas and extracolonic disease were observed in unrelated probands carrying the p.Lys1061LysfsX2 mutation (CAT-03 and CAT-04) and the whole gene deletions (CAT-12 and GAL-16) (Table 1). This phenotypic heterogeneity suggests that either modifier genes, epigenetic mechanisms or environmental factors could modulate the FAP phenotype. There is good evidence from humans, and particularly from mouse models, of the involvement of modifier genes that influence the severity of FAP. It is known that same sex siblings in their early twenties often show phenotypic differences which cannot be easily explained except by the action of modifier genes [30]. Despite those findings, further clinical information and an accurate follow-up of patients is necessary to confirm our results.

The two hotspots at codons 1061 and 1309 of the APC gene accounted in this study for 9.4% of the APC-positive families. However, they were reported mainly in Catalonian families. Mutation at codon 1061 was detected in 3 (CAT-03, CAT-04 and CAT-05) out of 13 Catalonian positive families (23%), but was not found in 19 APC-positiveGalician families. A similar trend was observed for the deletion at codon 1309: 15% (2 out of 13, CAT-10 and CAT-11) for Catalonians vs 5,2% (1 out of 19, GAL-24) for Galician patients. Therefore, we performed statistical analyses in order to test whether the Galician population had a significantly different mutation frequency at these codons. Ji-squared tests yielded significance for the 1061 mutation (p = 0,058) but not for the 1309 variant (p = 0,356).

Although different mutation screening methods were used to study these two populations, the possibility that this fact could have caused the different spectra observed would be very small. Firstly, the mutation frequency in both populations was similar (40% for Galicia and 38% for Catalonia, p = 0.888). Besides, Galician samples were directly sequenced, which was the most sensitive of the techniques used.

Similar results had already been observed in a previous study where 15 unrelated Galician patients were analysed, but in that study it was not possible to establish whether the inability to detect the recurrent mutations at codons 1061 and 1309 actually reflected an underrepresentation of these genetic variations in this population, or was simply due to a sampling bias [10]. Furthermore, when we considered all the data available from the Galician FAP patients altogether (the 19 APC-positive families from this study plus the 6 from our previous one [10]), the frequencies observed were 4% (1/25 APC-positive) for the 1309 deletion, and still 0% for the deletion at codon 1061, which is certainly quite remarkable. Thus, we recalculated the Ji-squared test for the 1309 mutation and a trend towards the underrepresentation of this variant was indeed observed (p = 0,265).

Although there is plenty of evidence that the mutational spectrum of the APC gene varies in different populations, these two hotspots are thoroughly reported worldwide. They represent around 8% and 20% of the APC-positive families, and the 5 bp deletion at codon 1309 is reported as the most common germline mutation [31, 32]. Interestingly, a frequency range for this deletion in different countries has also been described: a high rate in Japan (14%), a moderate frequency in most European populations (5–6%), and no 1309 deletions detected in Australia (0% out of 27 APC-positive families) [33]. It has also been recently reported that the frequency of the deletion at codon 1061 in 46 Czech and Slovak APC-positive families was lower than the expected (3%) [34]. The variation in the distribution of these hotspots could presumably be caused by an ascertainment bias, but in isolated populations it could as well be explained by a founder effect. For instance, in the Balearic Islands, where the hotspot at codon 1061 is overrepresented (50%), the haplotype analysis of the families sharing this deletion was consistent with the presence of a founder effect [35]. The recurrence of these two mutations has been linked to the molecular properties of the DNA region around codons 1061 and 1309, rather than with specific haplotypes. These two are located within a short hypermutable polyA repeat that may associate with an increased probability of DNA polymerase slippage during DNA replication, leading to an overrepresentation of deletions. The high incidence of the 1309 deletion among de novo cases, and the fact that this alteration was found to segregate with different haplotypes associated with the disease supports this hypothesis [33].

It is known that gene diversity in the Galician population is generally lower than in other European populations, as a result of its relative isolation from the rest of the Iberian Peninsula and the high emigration rates during the last two centuries [36, 37]. These genetic features would have possibly caused the selection of not yet identified allelic variants in DNA repair genes. Hypothetically, those variants would repair more efficiently the DNA polymerase slippage caused by the repetitive sequences around codons 1061 and 1309 during replication. Therefore, lower frequencies for these two APC hotspots should be observed. Such founder effects have already been observed in this population for some genetic diseases, including BRCA1 in familial breast cancer [38].

MUTYH mutations

Biallelic germline mutations in MUTYH were found in 24% of the APC-negative patients, i.e., 14/59 (fifty from this study plus 9 from the previous one [10]). This data is consistent with previous results [39, 40]. Differences between these populations were not significant (p = 0.517).

Table 2 shows that the two most frequent mutations reported to date (p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp) were detected in quite a number of cases, the frequency of these alleles being 71%. This observation is comparable to what has been described in the literature [9, 41]. Among the other mutations found, the c.1186_1187insGG accounted for 21% of the mutant alleles reported. This mutation was previously reported in Portuguese families with a similar frequency [22].

Biallelic MUTYH carriers displayed an attenuated polyposis phenotype without extracolonic manifestations, with the exception of patient CAT-19 who showed breast cancer at 59 years and CRC at 69 (Table 2). It is noteworthy that the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor proteins participate in the base excision repair of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) lesions [42]. Accordingly, loss of BER function due to biallelic MUTYH mutations may underlie breast cancer risk. In Dutch MAP patients, breast cancer occurred in 18% of females, significantly more than the expected from national statistics. This observed increased breast cancer risk should be thoroughly investigated [21].

The median age at diagnosis of CRC in MAP families was 51,5 years (ranging from 43 to 69) (Table 2). In contrast, classical FAP patients showed a CRC onset 10 years earlier (median 41, ranging from 20 to 46) (Table 1). As previously reported [8], it appears that disease symptoms in MAP are not as severe as those observed in APC- driven FAP, and that they resemble an attenuated polyposis phenotype. However, patients GAL-08, CAT-15, GAL-03 and CAT-18 presented ambiguous clinical manifestations, with a display of CRC at around their forties, which is more likely a feature of FAP, but a number of polyps and an onset typical of the attenuated phenotype. Hence, we have thought it appropriate to classify them as AFAP. We realise that classification of such patients is difficult, since it is well-known there is a lack of agreement concerning the exact diagnostic criteria that should be used to classify attenuated polyposis [43].

As expected, most of the bilallelic MUTYH carriers were found in families with an autosomal recessive model of inheritance, or in cases with apparent sporadic presentation. However, we identified three patients (CAT-14, GAL-22 and CAT-16) with a family history of vertical transmission of CRC; similar results had already been described [44].

Biallelic MUTYH mutations have been consistently linked to higher CRC susceptibility. However, the risk for monoallelic MUTYH carriers remains controversial. Balaguer et al. [26] used a meta-analysis of published case-control studies and concluded that monoallelic MUTYH carriers were not at increased risk for CRC, although an effect of bordeline statistical significance was observed for p.Tyr165Cys. In the present study, monoallelic changes with predicted functional relevance (p.Tyr165Cys, p.Gly382Asp, p.Val232Phe) were found in 3/45 patients, and accounted for 6.7% of cases. Nevertheless, they were not included as positive within the overall data, even though the p.Val232Phe was recently shown to reduce glycosylase activity [45].

Five new VUS were identified: c.-56 G>C, c.39 C>T (p.Ala13Ala), c.269A>G (p.Tyr90Cys), c.508C>T (p.Arg170Trp) and c.762 G>A (p.Gln254Gln). We also found p.Arg412Cys, previously described by Aceto et al. [46] and predicted by Polyphen as "possibly damaging". Neither of these variants were found in healthy controls when genotyping 500 chromosomes. It is quite remarkable though, that two of these previously not reported variants (p.Tyr90Cys and p.Arg170Trp), predicted as "probably damaging", were both found in CAT-22. This patient displayed multiple adenomas (50–60) and CRC at 53 years, but had no family history of polyposis. However, further studies are necessary to assess if these two variants are indeed deleterious.

Conclusion

Our mutation detection rate for the APC gene (39%) is consistent with previous reports. Using standard methods of mutation analysis, such as sequencing, 11% of the classical FAP patients would not have been detected, so analysis of large rearrangements of the APC gene is strongly recommended. A genotype-phenotype correlation was found for most of the APC identified mutations, although the inter-family phenotypic variability observed would suggest the existence of genetic and/or environmental modifiers.

Besides, our data regarding the incidence of the 1309 and 1061 deletions in APC could indicate that in Galician patients the frequency of these two hotspot mutations is underrepresented. In our study, codon 1061 proved to be significantly different from the Catalonian and other Caucasian populations. We believe this might be due to the genetic isolation of the Galician population.

Biallelic germline mutations in MUTYH accounted for 24% of the families analysed, all of which displayed an attenuated polyposis phenotype and a CRC onset 10 years later than FAP. It was observed that a family history of vertical transmission of CRC did not rule out the possibility of biallelic MUTYH mutations.

In short, the overall results resemble those previously published and confirm that large rearrangements represent an important percentage of APC germline mutations. The lower frequency observed for the two hotspots of APC in Galician families has probably lead to a higher heterogeneity of APC mutations in this population. MUTYH analysis is also recommended for all APC-negative families even if a recessive inheritance is not confirmed. From a molecular point of view, these findings altogether have important implications for the design of mutation detection strategies, especially in Galician FAP families.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS 05/2031, 04/1126, 05/0071, 08/0025, 08/1276), Xunta de Galicia (PGIDIT07PXIB9101209PR), Fundación de Investigación Médica Mutua Madrileña (to CRP, SCB and BG), Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SAF 07-64873), Asociación Española contra el Cáncer, Fundación Olga Torres (SCB), Acción Transversal contra el Cáncer (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) and Axudas para a intensificación da actividade investigadora dos profesionais dos centros do sistema sanitario público de Galicia RHI07/04 (Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia) to CRP. CIBERER and CIBEREHD are funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. NGF is supported by a Maria Barbeito's Fellowship from Xunta de Galicia, SCB is supported by a contract from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (CP 03-0070, Ministerio de Sanidad), CF has obtained a FPU' Fellowship from the Ministerio de Educacion, FB received a research grant from Fundacion Caja Madrid, and IM is supported by a contract from the CIBERER.

We thank Maria Magdalena, Olga Lortes, Eva Fernández and Lourdes Costa-Boix for the excellent technical assistance in the analysis of samples.

We also thank the following hospitals for providing blood samples: Surgery and Oncology Departments from Hospital Clínico de Santiago, Oncology Department from Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Digestive Departments from Hospital Xeral Cíes de Vigo and Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Digestive and Oncology Departments from Hospital Xeral Calde de Lugo, Medicine Department from Hospital da Costa de Burela (Lugo).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica (FPGMX)-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica (GMX)-USC, CIBERER, Santiago de Compostela
(2)
Departmento de Gastroenterología, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS
(3)
CIBER-ER, Departamento de Bioquímica y Genética Molecular, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS
(4)
Servicio de Oncoloxía Médica, Hospital Clínico-CHUS, Santiago de Compostela

References

  1. Sieber OM, Tomlinson IP, Lamlum H: The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumour suppressor-genetics, function and disease. Molecular Medicine Today. 2000, 6 (12): 462-469. 10.1016/S1357-4310(00)01828-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Knudsen AL, Bisgaard ML, Bulow S: Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP). A review of the literature. Familial Cancer. 2003, 2 (1): 43-55. 10.1023/A:1023286520725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lustig B, Behrens J: The Wnt signaling pathway and its role in tumor development. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2003, 129 (4): 199-221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beroud C, Soussi T: APC gene: database of germline and somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines. Nucleic Acids Research. 1996, 24 (1): 121-124. 10.1093/nar/24.1.121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Soravia C, Berk T, Madlensky L, Mitri A, Cheng H, Gallinger S, Cohen Z, Bapat B: Genotype-phenotype correlations in attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1998, 62 (6): 1290-1301. 10.1086/301883.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong JG, Davies DR, Guy SP, Frayling IM, Evans DG: APC mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis families in the Northwest of England. Human Mutation. 1997, 10 (5): 376-380. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)10:5<376::AID-HUMU7>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Tassan N, Chmiel NH, Maynard J, Fleming N, Livingston AL, Williams GT, Hodges AK, Davies DR, David SS, Sampson JR, et al: Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C-->T:A mutations in colorectal tumors. Nature Genetics. 2002, 30 (2): 227-232. 10.1038/ng828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, Heinimann K, Fidalgo P, Phillips RK, Bisgaard ML, Orntoft TF, Aaltonen LA, Hodgson SV, et al: Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003, 348 (9): 791-799. 10.1056/NEJMoa025283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Marra G, Jiricny J: Multiple Colorectal Adenomas-is their number up?. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003, 348 (9): 845-847. 10.1056/NEJMe030002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruiz-Ponte C, Vega A, Carracedo A, Barros F: Mutation analysis of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in northwest Spanish patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and sporadic colorectal cancer. Human Mutation. 2001, 18 (4): 355-10.1002/humu.1198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sieber OM, Lamlum H, Crabtree MD, Rowan AJ, Barclay E, Lipton L, Hodgson S, Thomas HJ, Neale K, Phillips RK, et al: Whole-gene APC deletions cause classical familial adenomatous polyposis, but not attenuated polyposis or "multiple" colorectal adenomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002, 99 (5): 2954-2958. 10.1073/pnas.042699199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Aretz S, Stienen D, Uhlhaas S, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Caspari R, Propping P, Friedl W: Large submicroscopic genomic APC deletions are a common cause of typical familial adenomatous polyposis. British Medical Journal. 2005, 42 (2): 185-192.Google Scholar
  13. Lamlum H, Ilyas M, Rowan A, Clark S, Johnson V, Bell J, Frayling I, Efstathiou J, Pack K, Payne S, et al: The type of somatic mutation at APC in familial adenomatous polyposis is determined by the site of the germline mutation: a new facet to Knudson's 'two-hit' hypothesis. Nature Medicine. 1999, 5 (9): 1071-1075. 10.1038/12511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Giarola M, Stagi L, Presciuttini S, Mondini P, Radice MT, Sala P, Pierotti MA, Bertario L, Radice P: Screening for mutations of the APC gene in 66 Italian familial adenomatous polyposis patients: evidence for phenotypic differences in cases with and without identified mutation. Human Mutation. 1999, 13 (2): 116-123. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)13:2<116::AID-HUMU3>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vandrovcova J, Stekrova J, Kebrdlova V, Kohoutova M: Molecular analysis of the APC and MYH genes in Czech families affected by FAP or multiple adenomas: 13 novel mutations. Human Mutation. 2004, 23 (4): 397-10.1002/humu.9224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagase H, Miyoshi Y, Horii A, Aoki T, Petersen GM, Vogelstein B, Maher E, Ogawa M, Maruyama M, Utsunomiya J: Screening for germ-line mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis patients: 61 new patients and a summary of 150 unrelated patients. Human Mutation. 1992, 1 (6): 467-473. 10.1002/humu.1380010603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobbie Z, Spycher M, Mary JL, Haner M, Guldenschuh I, Hurliman R, Amman R, Roth J, Muller H, Scott RJ: Correlation between the development of extracolonic manifestations in FAP patients and mutations beyond codon 1403 in the APC gene. Journal of Medical Genetics. 1996, 33 (4): 274-280. 10.1136/jmg.33.4.274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Miyoshi Y, Ando H, Nagase H, Nishisho I, Horii A, Miki Y, Mori T, Utsunomiya J, Baba S, Petersen G: Germ-line mutations of the APC gene in 53 familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1992, 89 (10): 4452-4456. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4452.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li G, Tamura K, Yamamoto Y, Sashio H, Utsunomiya J, Yamamura T, Shimoyama T, Furuyama J: Molecular and clinical study of familial adenomatous polyposis for genetic testing and management. Journal of Experimental Clinical Cancer Research. 1999, 18 (4): 519-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Won YJ, Park KJ, Kwon HJ, Lee JH, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chun SH, Han HJ, Park JG: Germline mutations of the APC gene in Korean familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Journal of Human Genetics. 1999, 44 (2): 103-108. 10.1007/s100380050118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen M, Franken PF, Reinards TH, Weiss MM, Wagner A, Klift van der H, Kloosterman S, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Aalfs CM, Ausems MG, et al: Multiplicity in polyp count and extracolonic manifestations in 40 Dutch patients with MYH associated polyposis coli (MAP). Journal of Medical Genetics. 2005, 42 (9): e54-10.1136/jmg.2005.033217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Isidro G, Laranjeira F, Pires A, Leite J, Regateiro F, Castro e Sousa F, Soares J, Castro C, Giria J, Brito MJ, et al: Germline MUTYH (MYH) mutations in Portuguese individuals with multiple colorectal adenomas. Human Mutation. 2004, 24 (4): 353-354. 10.1002/humu.9282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Primer3 Software. [http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/]
  24. Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T: Detection of Polymorphisms of Human DNA by Gel Electrophoresis as Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1989, 86 (8): 2766-2770. 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2766.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G: Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002, 30 (12): e57-10.1093/nar/gnf056.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Balaguer F, Castellvi-Bel S, Castells A, Andreu M, Munoz J, Gisbert JP, Llor X, Jover R, de Cid R, Gonzalo V: Identification of MYH Mutation Carriers in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Case-Control, Population-Based Study. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2007, 5 (3): 379-387. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Polyphen: Prediction of funtional effect of humannsSNPs. [http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/]
  28. Michils G, Tejpar S, Thoelen R, van Cutsem E, Vermeesch JR, Fryns JP, Legius E, Matthijs G: Large deletions of the APC gene in 15% of mutation-negative patients with classical polyposis (FAP): a Belgian study. Human Mutation. 2005, 25 (2): 125-134. 10.1002/humu.20122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieuwenhuis MH, Vasen HFA: Correlations between mutation site in APC and phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): A review of the literature. Critical Reviews in Oncology and Hematology. 2007, 61 (2): 153-161. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.07.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomlinson IP, Neale K, Talbot IC, Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Phillips RK, Bodmer WF: A modifying locus for familial adenomatous polyposis may be present on chromosome 1p35-p36. Journal of Medical Genetics. 1996, 33 (4): 268-273. 10.1136/jmg.33.4.268.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Goss KH, Groden J: Biology of the adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000, 18 (9): 1967-1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fearnhead NS, Britton MP, Bodmer WF: The ABC of APC. Human Molecular Genetics. 2001, 10 (7): 721-733. 10.1093/hmg/10.7.721.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Aretz S, Uhlhaas S, Caspari R, Mangold E, Pagenstecher C, Propping P, Friedl W: Frequency and parental origin of de novo APC mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2004, 12 (1): 52-58. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stekrova J, Sulova M, Kebrdlova V, Zidkova K, Kotlas J, Ilencikova D, Vesela K, Kohoutova M: Novel APC mutations in Czech and Slovak FAP families: clinical and genetic aspects. BMC Medical Genetics. 2007, 8: 16-10.1186/1471-2350-8-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Gonzalez S, Blanco I, Campos O, Julia M, Reyes J, Llompart A, Cabeza E, Germa JR, Obrador A, Capella G: Founder mutation in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in the Balearic Islands. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 2005, 158 (1): 70-74. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.07.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Salas A, Comas D, Lareu MV, Bertranpetit J, Carracedo A: mtDNA analysis of the Galician population: a genetic edge of European variation. European Journal of Human Genetics. 1998, 6 (4): 365-375. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Salas A, Lareu V, Calafell F, Bertranpetit J, Carracedo A: mtDNA hypervariable region II (HVII) sequences in human evolution studies. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2000, 8 (12): 964-974. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vega A, Torres M, Martinez JI, Ruiz-Ponte C, Barros F, Carracedo A: Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast and breast/ovarian cancer families shows population substructure in the Iberian peninsula. Annals of Human Genetics. 2002, 66 (1): 29-36. 10.1017/S0003480001001014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielsen M, Hes FJ, Nagengast FM, Weiss MM, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Morreau H, Breuning MH, Wijnen JT, Tops CM, Vasen HFA: Germline mutations in APC and MUTYH are responsible for the majority of families with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis. Clinical Genetics. 2007, 71 (5): 427-433. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00766.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kairupan CF, Meldrum CJ, Crooks R, Milward EA, Spigelman AD, Burgess B, Groombridge C, Kirk J, Tucker K, Ward R, et al: Mutation analysis of the MYH gene in an Australian series of colorectal polyposis patients with or without germline APC mutations. International Journal of Cancer. 2005, 116 (1): 73-77. 10.1002/ijc.20983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lipton L, Tomlinson IP: The multiple colorectal adenoma phenotype and MYH, a base excision repair gene. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2004, 2 (8): 633-638. 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00286-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Le Page F, Randrianarison V, Marot D, Cabannes J, Perricaudet M, Feunteun J, Sarasin A: BRCA1 and BRCA2 Are Necessary for the Transcription-Coupled Repair of the Oxidative 8-Oxoguanine Lesion in Human Cells 1. Cancer Research. 2000, 60 (19): 5548-5552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vasen HFA, Moslein G, Alonso A, Aretz S, Bernstein I, Bertario L, Blanco I, Bulow S, Burn J, Capella G, et al: Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut. 2008, 57 (5): 704-713. 10.1136/gut.2007.136127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Riegert-Johnson DL, Johnson RA, Rabe KG, Wang L, Thomas B, Baudhuin LM, Thibodeau SN, Boardman LA: The Value of MUTYH Testing in Patients with Early Onset Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer Referred for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer Syndrome Testing. Genetic Testing. 2007, 11 (4): 361-366. 10.1089/gte.2007.0014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bai H, Jones S, Guan X, Wilson TM, Sampson JR, Cheadle JP, Lu AL: Functional characterization of two human MutY homolog (hMYH) missense mutations (R227W and V232F) that lie within the putative hMSH6 binding domain and are associated with hMYH polyposis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005, 33 (2): 597-604. 10.1093/nar/gki209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Aceto G, Cristina Curia M, Veschi S, De Lellis L, Mammarella S, Catalano T, Stuppia L, Palka G, Valanzano R, Tonelli F, et al: Mutations of APC and MYH in unrelated Italian patients with adenomatous polyposis coli. Human Mutation. 2005, 26 (4): 394-10.1002/humu.9370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/10/57/prepub

Copyright

© Gómez-Fernández et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement