Skip to main content

Testicular expression of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 in azoospermia



Tudor domain-containing proteins (TDRDs) play a critical role in piRNA biogenesis and germ cell development. piRNAs, small regulatory RNAs, act by silencing of transposons during germline development and it has recently been shown in animal model studies that defects in TDRD genes can lead to sterility in males.


Here we evaluate gene and protein expression levels of four key TDRDs (TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12) in testicular biopsy samples obtained from men with obstructive azoospermia (OA, n = 29), as controls, and various types of non-obstructive azoospermia containing hypospermatogenesis (HP, 28), maturation arrest (MA, n = 30), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS, n = 32) as cases. One-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test was used to determine inter-group differences in TDRD gene expression among cases and controls.


The results showed very low expression of TDRD genes in SCOS specimens. Also, the expression of TDRD1 and TDRD9 genes were lower in MA samples compared to OA samples. The expression of TDRD5 significantly reduced in SCOS, MA and HP specimens than the OA specimens. Indeed, TDRD12 exhibited a very low expression in HP specimens in comparison to OA specimens. All these results were confirmed by Western blot technique.


TDRDs could be very important in male infertility, which should be express in certain stages of spermatogenesis.

Peer Review reports


Infertility remains a significant global burden [1]. Estimates suggest that 10–15% of couples worldwide experience infertility [2], with male infertility being the underlying cause in 20–50% of cases [3]. For the majority of cases however the etiology remains unknown, and is termed idiopathic infertility [4]. Azoospermia, absence of spermatozoa in the semen, is one of the most common reasons for infertility in men, with a prevalence of 1% in the general population, and over 15% in infertile men [5, 6]. Forty percent of cases are due to male genital system blockage (obstructive azoospermia) and in the remaining cases due to low sperm production (non-obstructive azoospermia - NOA) [7, 8].

PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) proteins have recently been shown to play an essential role in male fertility and spermatogenesis in humans [9]. The piRNA pathway-associated genes are highly expressed in germline cells [10]. piRNAs act by suppressing transposons and preventing their mobilization through both post-transcriptional and transcriptional mechanisms, such as degradation, chromatin remodeling, and DNA methylation [11,12,13,14].

P-element–induced wimpy testis (PIWI) proteins specifically recognize piRNAs to mediate transposon silencing. The Tudor domain of Tudor domain-containing proteins (TDRDs) have been shown to directly bind to PIWI to help regulate this process via their dimethylated arginine (sDMA) or lysine residues [15], potentially acting as a mediator or cofactor for protein-protein interactions in the piRNA pathway [16]. Twelve TDRDs have been identified in human and animal model studies, and defects in each of these can interfere with spermatogenesis [16,17,18].

Given the current knowledge that piRNAs and PIWI genes are involved in spermatogenesis, and the potential role of TDRDs in this process, we sought to evaluate TDRD gene expression in testicular tissue of patients with azoospermia.


Study participants

One hundred and nineteen NOA and OA men admitted to the Abortion Research Centre, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, were entered into this study. All subjects were undergoing bilateral testicular tissue micro-dissection (mTESE) operations to attain spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Preoperative tests included karyotyping and Y chromosome microdeletion analysis, and the levels of serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone. Patients were not receiving hormone therapy and all had primary infertility. No history of TESE and cryptorchidism were reported for any of the participants. Patients with cystic fibrosis, chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletion were omitted from the study. Subjects with normal spermatogenesis were included as the control group. The best control samples were men with proven fertility, and the problem was that they never referred to infertility centers for mTESE surgery, so we used samples with normal spermatogenesis as the control group.

Tissue acquisition and histological evaluation

Following TESE, testicular samples were split into three; one was fixed in Bouin’s solution for histological examination and two other sections instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction and Western blot assay. Histological examination was carried out with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and interpreted by a trained pathologist to classify the samples with normal spermatogenesis (OA, n = 29), lack of germ cells (SCOS, n = 32), declined number of spermatozoa (HP, n = 28), and incomplete maturation of germ cells (MA, n = 30). No significant differences in age, LH, FSH, and testosterone serum concentrations were found between the OA, HP, MA, and SCOS groups (Table 1).

Table 1 The clinical features of patient groups

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Frozen testis tissue was homogenized, and total RNA extracted using the RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based on the manufacturer’s protocol and then stored at − 80 °C. In-solution DNase digestion was accomplished to eliminate DNA contamination. The concentration and purification of RNA was specified using Nanodrop2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA) and confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Template cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of whole extracted RNA with Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) using oligo dT and random hexamer primers simultaneously for each reaction in an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient (Hamburg, Germany).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Initial denaturation for RT-PCR started at 95 °C for 8 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s (Table 1). The melting curve was formed by increasing the temperature from 72 to 95 °C to omit genomic DNA or amplification of primer dimers. qPCR was in triplicates on 48-well plates Step-One-Plus RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems) by 1.0 μl of produced cDNA, 10 μl of the SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems ABI/PE, Foster City, CA), and 7.0 μl of DNase/RNase-free water, 1 μl of designing primers (Table 2) for the gene expression profile. The average CT was used for further analysis, and all RT–PCR runs contained non template (cDNA) controls in order to reject potential contamination. Relative gene expression analysis was performed according to the comparative CT method: 2-∆∆CT for TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12. The 2-∆∆CT parameter displays the expression fold of TDRD with respect to the housekeeping ACTB gene.

Table 2 qPCR primers used in this study

Western blot

Western blot examination was accomplished as formerly explained [19]. Briefly, equal amounts of proteins (35 mg) obtained from testis samples were separated with 12% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose paper. The membranes were blocked with (2–5%) non-fat dry milk in 1x TBST (10 mM/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 150 mM/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at 25–30 °C, and then incubated with primary TDRD1(1:300; No. ABIN2373082; Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany), TDRD5 (1:300; No. ABIN4358317; Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany), TDRD9 (1:300; No. ABIN2373082; Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany), TDRD12 (1:300; No. ABIN6769800; Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany), ACTB (1:300; No. ABIN4284408; Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany) antibody at 4 °C overnight, then with secondary goat anti-human-IgG-(H-L) antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (1:500; No. SA00001–17; ProteinTech, Manchester, M3 3WF United Kingdom) for 1 h at 25 °C. At the end, the immunoreactive signals were determined via the ECL kit (Thermo Scientific).

Statistical analysis

The results are verified as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was done using one way anova test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test. P-values less than 0.05 were deemed to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was implemented via GraphPad Prism 6 software.


Histological analysis of adult testis sections with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showed clear differences between samples (Figs. 1 and 2). Testicular TDRD gene expression was analyzed using qPCR and significant differences in expression observed between cases and controls. The expression of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 genes were significantly lower in SCOS than controls (P < 0.001, Dunn’s post-test). The expression of TDRD1 and TDRD9 was significantly lower in MA samples than controls (P < 0.001, Dunn’s post-test) (Figs. 3 and 4). The expression of TDRD5 was significantly lower in all cases compared to controls (P < 0.001, Dunn’s post-test) (Fig. 5). The results showed that the expression of TDRD12 was also significantly lower in HP samples compared with controls (P < 0.001, Dunn’s post-test) (Fig. 6). The western blotting test showed the following results: TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9, and TDRD12 proteins were not expressed in SCOS samples. TDRD1 and TDRD9 proteins showed low expression in MA samples. The expression level of TDRD5 protein in MA and HP specimens was very low. TDRD12 protein was not expressed in HP samples (Fig. 7).

Fig. 1

a Testicular sections of samples with OA (obstructive azoospermia). b Testicular segments of specimens by SCOS (Sertoli cell-only syndrome). SP = spermatocyte; MS = mature spermatid; SC = Sertoli cell; SG = spermatogonia; Scale bar = 20 μm

Fig. 2

a Testicular segments of specimens with MA (maturation arrest). b Testicular segments of specimens with HP (hypospermatogenesis). SP = spermatocyte; MS = mature spermatid; SC = Sertoli cell; SG = spermatogonia; Scale bar = 20 μm

Fig. 3

Comparison of the expression levels of TDRD1 between HP, MA, SCOS, and OA(control) patients. *** p < 0.001

Fig. 4

Comparison of the expression levels of TDRD9 between HP, MA, SCOS, and OA(control) patients. *** p < 0.001

Fig. 5

Comparison of the expression levels of TDRD5 between HP, MA, SCOS, and OA(control) patients. *** p < 0.001

Fig. 6

Comparison of the expression levels of TDRD12 between HP, MA, SCOS, and OA(control) patients. *** p < 0.001

Fig. 7

Western blotting test results for protein expression of TDRDs genes in HP, MA, SCOS, and OA samples compared to control group


Spermatogenesis is a complex process, involving many cell type- and stage-specific transcription factors [20, 21]. Transposons have a major impact on the architecture and function of genomes, and thus their suppression is particularly important in early stage germ cells where epigenetic control is relaxed to permit genome-wide reprogramming. The large class of TDRDs play a pivotal role in the protection of germ cells against transposons [22, 23]; however, up to now their role in human spermatogenesis has not been well studied. The present study investigated the gene expression and protein levels of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 genes in testicular tissue of NOA patients in comparison with OA patients.

Recent studies in mice models have demonstrated that Tdrd5 gene plays an important role in silencing of LINE-1, a transposon member of the long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE), which is involved in assembly of polar granules in germ cells, chromatoid bodies, and spermatogenesis [24, 25]. Previous projects showed that TDRD1 in prospermatogonia, arrange a complex with Mili (mouse homologue of PIWIL2), also TDRD9 is a vital partner of Miwi2 (mouse homologue of PIWIL4). The studies proved that the TDRD1 and TDRD9 are involved in biogenesis of primary and secondary piRNAs, transposon repression and accuracy of meiosis phase [15, 26,27,28,29]. TDRD12 has a crucial role in the final stage of meiosis phase, secondary piRNAs biogenesis and transposon silencing.

The lack of expression of TDRD genes found in SCOS was a common observation in this study, suggesting that the transcription of these genes could be limited to germ cells. Due to the lack of germ cells in SCOS, it seems likely that the expression levels of TDRD genes in the SCOS samples would not be detected. However, we did detect very low levels of expression of these genes in some individuals, which could show the existence of small foci of spermatogenesis in these specimens or mixed patterns in NOA subtypes. Western blot analysis results confirmed the findings from qPCR, and demonstrated lack of TDRD expression in SCOS samples. Because the expression of the TDRDs genes was found to be very limited in the qPCR technique in SCOS specimens, but not in the Western blot technique, this difference could be attributed to the inherent nature of the Western blot technique, which does not reveal very low protein expression.

We also found that TDRD1 expression was significantly downregulated in the MA group versus controls. In Mili knockout mouse models, infertility of male mice has been shown to be due to stopping spermatogenesis at zygotene-pachytene stages. It has been revealed that hypermethylation of TDRD1 may lead to spermatogenic dysfunction [30]. Xiao-Bin Zhu et al. [31] identified the SNP rs77559927 in TDRD1 was related to a diminished risk of spermatogenic malfunction [29]. Western blot analysis results confirmed that the protein encoded by the TDRD1 gene had low expression in MA samples. The results of this experiment could confirm the role of TDRD1 in the early stages of meiosis process, likely to suppress transposons, which is essential for the progression of human spermatogenesis.

Another finding of this study was that the expression of TDRD5 was significantly reduced in almost all cases (SCOS, MA and HP) compared to controls. Mitinori Saitou et al. reported that loss of Tdrd5 leads to absence of spermatozoa, transposon depression and infertility [25]. Tdrd5−/− mutations were arrested round spermatid and disorganized of chromatoid bodies [24]. The results of Western blot analysis also showed that the TDRD5 protein had a very low expression in almost all samples. These results revealed that TDRD5 is not restricted to prospermatogonia, unlike TDRD1, TDRD5 has more activity [25]. TDRD5 could have the same function in humans and mouse models, which plays a central role in the whole process of spermatogenesis.

The TDRD9, in collaboration with the HIWI2 (human homologue of PIWIL4), has a substantial effect on the synthesis of the piRNAs. In Tdrd9−/− mutants, the whole quantity of piRNAs were entirely reduced in testis [27]. Faruk Hadziselimovic et al. showed that cryptorchid boys with defected expression of TDRD9 have a high risk of infertility due to transposon desilencing [32]. Two separate studies in the population of Iran and China reported a significant relationship between HIWI2 gene rs508485 polymorphism and increased risk of spermatogenesis defects [33, 34]. Arafat et al. reported the relationship between the deletion frameshift mutation in TDRD9 and NOA [35]. In present study, expression of TDRD9 like TDRD1 showed a significantly decreased in the MA samples compared with OA samples. Western blot analysis results proved that the protein encoded by the TDRD9 gene had low expression in MA samples. It seems TDRD9 and TDRD1 have approximately the same role in human and other animals and they are very important for the meiosis process.

The TDRD12 is indirectly related to the TDRD1 and MILI, because it has a different location than they [36]. Jung-Jae Ko and colleagues revealed that TDRD12 is predominantly localized at the acrosome of the spermatid, which is completely different with other members of the TDRDs family [37]. In this study, TDRD12 exhibited a very low expression in HP specimens in comparison to OA specimens. In addition, Western blot analysis results proved that the protein encoded by the TDRD12 gene was not expressed in HP specimens. TDRD12 is contributing to a process that leads to compaction of the sperm nucleus, histone-to-protamine exchange, which is essential for the differentiation of round spermatid into spermatozoa [36]. TDRD12 could be part of the master regulators in the terminal processes of spermatogenesis, and might act without piRNAs. piRNAs are inactivated in the round spermatid stage [38].


To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the expression of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 genes in NOA and OA samples by qPCR and Western blot technique. Given the potential role for TDRDs in male infertility, our results suggest there is a need for further investigation to improve knowledge about the etiology of male infertility.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Google repository (following links). and





Long interspersed nuclear elements


Maturation arrest


Mouse homologue of PIWIL2


Mouse homologue of PIWIL4


Non-obstructive azoospermia


Obstructive azoospermia


Piwi-interacting RNA


Piwi like RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing


Sertoli cell-only syndrome


Symmetric dimethylated arginine


Tudor domain-containing proteins


  1. 1.

    Olszewska M, Wanowska E, Kishore A, Huleyuk N, Georgiadis AP, Yatsenko AN, et al. Genetic dosage and position effect of small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) in human sperm nuclei in infertile male patient. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17408.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jarow JP. Diagnostic approach to the infertile male patient. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2007;36(2):297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Okada H, Tajima A, Shichiri K, Tanaka A, Tanaka K, Inoue I. Genome-wide expression of azoospermia testes demonstrates a specific profile and implicates ART3 in genetic susceptibility. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(2):e26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lee JY, Dada R, Sabanegh E, Carpi A, Agarwal A. Role of genetics in azoospermia. Urology. 2011;77(3):598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jarvi K, Lo K, Fischer A, Grantmyre J, Zini A, Chow V, et al. CUA guideline: the workup of azoospermic males. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010;4(3):163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ma M, Yang S, Zhang Z, Li P, Gong Y, Liu L, et al. Sertoli cells from non-obstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia patients show distinct morphology, Raman spectrum and biochemical phenotype. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1863–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6):539–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cao C, Wen Y, Wang X, Fang N, Yuan S, Huang X. Testicular piRNA profile comparison between successful and unsuccessful micro-TESE retrieval in NOA patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(5):801–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tóth KF, Pezic D, Stuwe E, Webster A. The piRNA pathway guards the germline genome against transposable elements. InNon-coding RNA and the Reproductive System. Dordrecht: Springer; 2016. p. 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aravin AA, Van Der Heijden GW, Castañeda J, Vagin VV, Hannon GJ, Bortvin A. Cytoplasmic compartmentalization of the fetal piRNA pathway in mice. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(12):e1000764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Carmell MA, Girard A, Van De Kant HJ, Bourc’his D, Bestor TH, de Rooij DG, et al. MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell. 2007;12(4):503–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kuramochi-Miyagawa S, Kimura T, Ijiri TW, Isobe T, Asada N, Fujita Y, et al. Mili, a mammalian member of piwi family gene, is essential for spermatogenesis. Development. 2004;131(4):839–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brower-Toland B, Findley SD, Jiang L, Liu L, Yin H, Dus M, et al. Drosophila PIWI associates with chromatin and interacts directly with HP1a. Genes Dev. 2007;21(18):2300–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen C, Jin J, James DA, Adams-Cioaba MA, Park JG, Guo Y, et al. Mouse Piwi interactome identifies binding mechanism of Tdrkh Tudor domain to arginine methylated Miwi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(48):20336–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pillai RS, Chuma S. piRNAs and their involvement in male germline development in mice. Develop Growth Differ. 2012;54(1):78–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hosokawa M, Shoji M, Kitamura K, Tanaka T, Noce T, Chuma S, et al. Tudor-related proteins TDRD1/MTR-1, TDRD6 and TDRD7/TRAP: domain composition, intracellular localization, and function in male germ cells in mice. Dev Biol. 2007;301(1):38–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liu K, Chen C, Guo Y, Lam R, Bian C, Xu C, et al. Structural basis for recognition of arginine methylated Piwi proteins by the extended Tudor domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(43):18398–403.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    He Y, Luo M, Yi M, Sheng Y, Cheng Y, Zhou R, et al. Identification of a testis-enriched heat shock protein and fourteen members of hsp70 family in the swamp eel. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65269.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    de Kretser DM, Loveland KL, Meinhardt A, Simorangkir D, Wreford N. Spermatogenesis. Human Reprod. 1998;13(suppl_1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yuan S, Mcswiggin H, Zheng H, Yan W. A testis-specific gene, Ubqlnl, is dispensable for mouse embryonic development and spermatogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(6):408.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sukthaworn S, Panyim S, Udomkit A. Functional characterization of a cDNA encoding Piwi protein in Penaeus monodon and its potential roles in controlling transposon expression and spermatogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2019;229:60–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Demoliou C. piRNAs-Transposon Silencing and Germ Line Development. InGenomic Elements in Health, Disease and Evolution. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Smith JM, Bowles J, Wilson M, Teasdale RD, Koopman P. Expression of the tudor-related gene Tdrd5 during development of the male germline in mice. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004;4(6):701–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yabuta Y, Ohta H, Abe T, Kurimoto K, Chuma S, Saitou M. TDRD5 is required for retrotransposon silencing, chromatoid body assembly, and spermiogenesis in mice. J Cell Biol. 2011;192(5):781–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Deng W, Lin H. Miwi, a murine homolog of piwi, encodes a cytoplasmic protein essential for spermatogenesis. Dev Cell. 2002;2(6):819–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shoji M, Tanaka T, Hosokawa M, Reuter M, Stark A, Kato Y, et al. The TDRD9-MIWI2 complex is essential for piRNA-mediated retrotransposon silencing in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell. 2009;17(6):775–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Siomi MC, Mannen T, Siomi H. How does the Royal Family of Tudor rule the PIWI-interacting RNA pathway? Genes Dev. 2010;24(7):636–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhu X, Zhi E, Li Z. MOV10L1 in piRNA processing and gene silencing of retrotransposons during spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2015;149(5):R229–R35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chuma S, Hosokawa M, Kitamura K, Kasai S, Fujioka M, Hiyoshi M, et al. Tdrd1/Mtr-1, a tudor-related gene, is essential for male germ-cell differentiation and nuage/germinal granule formation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(43):15894–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhu X-B, Lu J-Q, Zhi E-L, Zhu Y, Zou S-S, Zhu Z-J, et al. Association of a TDRD1 variant with spermatogenic failure susceptibility in the Han Chinese. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(8):1099–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hadziselimovic F, Hadziselimovic N, Demougin P, Krey G, Oakeley E. Deficient expression of genes involved in the endogenous defense system against transposons in cryptorchid boys with impaired mini-puberty. Sex Dev. 2011;5(6):287–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gu A, Ji G, Shi X, Long Y, Xia Y, Song L, et al. Genetic variants in Piwi-interacting RNA pathway genes confer susceptibility to spermatogenic failure in a Chinese population. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(12):2955–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kamaliyan Z, Pouriamanesh S, Amin-Beidokhti M, Rezagholizadeh A, Mirfakhraie R. HIWI2 rs508485 polymorphism is associated with non-obstructive azoospermia in iranian patients. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;5(2):108.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Arafat M, Har-Vardi I, Harlev A, Levitas E, Zeadna A, Abofoul-Azab M, et al. Mutation in TDRD9 causes non-obstructive azoospermia in infertile men. J Med Genet. 2017;54(9):633–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pandey RR, Tokuzawa Y, Yang Z, Hayashi E, Ichisaka T, Kajita S, et al. Tudor domain containing 12 (TDRD12) is essential for secondary PIWI interacting RNA biogenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(41):16492–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim M, Ki BS, Hong K, Park S-p, Ko J-J, Choi Y. Tudor domain containing protein TDRD12 expresses at the acrosome of spermatids in mouse testis. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29(7):944.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gou L-T, Kang J-Y, Dai P, Wang X, Li F, Zhao S, et al. Ubiquitination-deficient mutations in human Piwi cause male infertility by impairing histone-to-protamine exchange during spermiogenesis. Cell. 2017;169(6):1090–104. e13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank to Dr. S.Mirjalili, Dr. Montazeri, Mr. Tajomolian, and Mr. Heydarian for their valuable support.


No funding has been received for this experiment.

Author information




EB and AK performing the main steps of essay and writing the manuscript. MA and MN Collecting the samples and helping to perform RNA extraction and qPCR. MH and MV Analysis of results and doing statistical tests. NG Head of team and monitoring and fixing technical errors during all steps of the study. SR and IA and YJ Contribute to Western blotting and manuscript editing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasrin Ghasemi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Ethics Committee of the Shahid sadoughi University of Medical Sciences of Yazd approved the study design (IR.SSU.MEDICINE.REC.1396.220) and written informed consent was obtained from each participant before the collection of tissue samples.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babakhanzadeh, E., Khodadadian, A., Rostami, S. et al. Testicular expression of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 in azoospermia. BMC Med Genet 21, 33 (2020).

Download citation


  • Spermatogenesis
  • Non-obstructive Azoospermia
  • piRNAs
  • TDRD genes