Skip to main content

Association of rs610604 in TNFAIP3 and rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene polymorphisms with psoriasis susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case-control studies



To date, the fundamental pathophysiology underlying the occurrence and progression of psoriasis are still unanswered questions. Genome-wide association surveys have revealed that TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 were key biomarkers for psoriasis. Here, we intended to conduct a survey on the association between TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 gene polymorphisms and psoriasis risk.


A comprehensive search of four online databases—China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was undertaken up to August 25, 2019. We chose allele genetic model to deal with the original data. Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the risk bias of each study. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate the combined odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.


In total, we included 13 case-control studies consist of 13,908 psoriasis patients and 20,051 controls in this work. Our results demonstrated that rs610604 in TNFAIP3 polymorphism was significantly associated with psoriasis risk using random-effect model (G vs. T, OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31, P = 0.0002), and a significant association between rs17728338 in TNIP1 polymorphism and psoriasis vulnerability using fixed-effect model (A vs. G, OR = 1.69, 95% CI:1.58–1.80, P < 0.00001).


Our findings indicated that rs610604 in TNFAIP3 and rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene polymorphisms were associated with psoriasis susceptibility.

Peer Review reports


Psoriasis is currently regarded as a chronic, inflammatory skin disease associated with systemic conditions [1,2,3]. As with other dermatoses, the patients who suffered from it also have to face the enormous psychological burden because of visible disfiguration. Considerable comorbid diseases often occur in psoriasis patients, including psoriatic arthritis, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal diseases, mood disorders as well as other emerging comorbid diseases [4]. Psoriasis affects approximately 2–3% of the population worldwide, and its prevalence is much higher in western countries [5, 6]. To date, five types of psoriasis have been identified: psoriasis vulgaris, guttate or eruptive psoriasis, inverse psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and pustular psoriasis [3].

As a complex inflammatory disorder, the aetiology and pathogenesis of psoriasis are widely thought to be caused by the interplay of intrinsic and environmental factors. Numerous triggers and aggravations for psoriasis occurrence have been identified such as mild localized trauma, drugs, HIV infection and streptococcal pharyngitis [7]. However, intrinsic factors such as genetics may play a more important role. Thanks to the powerful genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as well as other genetic studies, more than 60 regions of the human genome have now been identified to be correlated with psoriasis [8]. Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha-Induced Protein 3 (TNFAIP3) and TNFAIP3 Interacting Protein 1 (TNIP1) are among them, and they were first discovered to be associated with psoriasis in 2009 [9]. After that, numerous studies on the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 with the risk of psoriasis have conducted. However, the conclusions of these studies may be incomprehensive and contradictory. Thus, we aimed was to undertake a meta-analysis to analyze these studies comprehensively.

TNFAIP3 gene is located on human chromosome 6q23.3, another alias for TNFAIP3 is A20. While TNIP1 is located on 5q33.1. They are all Protein-Coding genes encode ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 and A20-Binding Inhibitor Of NF-Kappa-B Activation 1 (ABIN-1), which interact with each other to influence intracellular signaling [10, 11]. Polymorphisms of the two genes may alter their protein-coding, and thus to have an impact on their closest functional protein partners. The interrelation network of TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 with their nearest associated functional protein partners were illustrated on Fig. 1. Over the years, accumulating evidence indicated that genetic variations in the genes TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 are strongly associated with vulnerability to numerous inflammatory diseases [12,13,14]. Considering that study sample sizes were small and the statistical effect was limited of an individual study, this meta-analysis is meant to provide the most comprehensive and precise evaluation on the association of TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 polymorphisms with psoriasis vulnerability.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Network of TNFAIP3, TNIP1 and their closest functional partners. These data were from the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database (


Search strategy

Two of our investigators (Hai-bo Gong and Shu-tao Gao) independently did the literature searching among four major databases—CNKI, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library—for papers published before August 25, 2019. The retrieval strategy of PubMed was as follows: ((((Psoriasis) OR “Psoriasis”[Mesh])) AND (((((((“Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3”[Mesh]) OR Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3) OR Zinc Finger Protein A20) OR A20) OR TNF Alpha-Induced Protein 3)) OR (((((((“TNIP1 protein, human” [Supplementary Concept]) OR TNIP1) OR TNFAIP3 Interacting Protein 1) OR A20-Binding Inhibitor Of NF-Kappa-B Activation 1) OR VAN protein, human) OR TNFalpha-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1, human) OR ABIN-1 protein, human))) AND ((((((single nucleotide polymorphism) OR Polymorphism) OR Alleles) OR SNP) OR Variation) OR gene).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The main contents of our inclusion criteria are given as follows: published case-control studies on humans; psoriasis should be diagnosed according to clinical diagnosis criteria; studies related to the association of TNFAIP3 or TNIP1 polymorphisms with psoriasis susceptibility; contained sufficient original data to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Accordingly, Studies met the following criteria should be excluded: reviews, conference abstracts, case reports; the exact number of alleles wasn’t able to be ascertained, and duplicated articles.

Data extraction

The following information was extracted from each candidate study by two independent investigators (Hai-bo Gong and Shu-tao Gao) including: author’s names, year of publication, Ethnicity of the study population, numbers of cases and controls, and the allele frequencies of the TNFAIP3 or TNAP1 polymorphisms, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) results.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of each eligible study was evaluated by two investigators (Hai-bo Gong and Shu-tao Gao). Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to appraise all included studies in line with its criteria. We used “Score system” to judge each study mainly made up of three aspects: selection (four items), comparability (two items), and the outcomes of case control studies (three items). Every included study received a total of 0–9 scores according to these items. A higher score indicated better quality. Studies with ≥5 scores were considered to have high quality for further analysis. When disagreements occurred between the two investigators, the third reviewer (Xiong-ming Pu) will be invited to make the final decision.

Statistical analysis

The preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) was used to complete this meta-analysis [15]. We processed the initial data using allele model of inheritance due to a lack of sufficient information. The association between rs610604 in TNFAIP3 and rs17728338 in TNIP1 polymorphisms with psoriasis was estimated by pooled ORs with 95% CIs. Q-statistical test and I2 test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among all included studies [16]. The random-effect model was used to combine the data in the cases of heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I2 > 50%) or fixed-effect model was used when it was out of heterogeneity (P >  0.1, I2 < 50%) [17, 18]. The Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium results were either extracted from original studies or calculated by initial data in included studies. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corp LP, U.S.A). Revman 5.3 software was used to generate Forest plots. Egger’s test was used to evaluate the publication bias by Stata version 12.0.

Functional predictions

To dig deeper into the potentially functional role of these loci, we used in silico tool HaploReg 4.1 to explore the annotations in the human genome.


Study characteristics

Initial retrieval of the four databases harvested 206 records: 43 from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), 72 from PubMed, 80 from Embase, and 11 from Cochrane library. After removed duplicated and irrelevant records. 13 articles ultimately went into the process of meta-analysis. The detailed process of the literature search and screen is shown in Fig. 2. Of the 13 articles, 11 articles containing original data for rs610604. These studies were performed in UK [19], Egypt [20], India [21], China [22,23,24,25], Pakistani [26], USA [27], Sweden [28], México [29]. In all, these studies included 11,556 psoriasis patients and 16,720 controls. As for rs17728338, there were 9 articles involved in them, and they were conducted in UK [19], Europe [30], China [22, 23, 31], India [21], Pakistani [26], USA [27], México [29]. In all, these studies containing 11,776 psoriasis patients and 17,631 controls. The detailed characteristics of every study for rs610604 and rs17728338 are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The results of methodological quality evaluation for each study by using NOS is illustrated shown in Table 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram of literature search and screen

Table 1 Main characteristics of included studies
Table 2 Main characteristics of included studies
Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

Meta-analyses results

Rs610604 polymorphism and psoriasis susceptibility

We used random-effect model to evaluate the association between rs610604 polymorphism and psoriasis vulnerability owning to a significant heterogeneity amidst all the included studies (P < 0.0001, I2 = 70%). The results demonstrated that rs610604 was significantly associated with psoriasis risk (G vs. T, OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31, P = 0.0002; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of rs610604 in TNFAIP3 gene and risk of psoriasis

Rs17728338 polymorphism and psoriasis susceptibility

Heterogeneity was small among all the studies for rs17728338 (P = 0.41, I2 = 4%). therefore, the fixed-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Our results demonstrated a significant association between rs17728338 polymorphism and psoriasis vulnerability (A vs. G, OR = 1.69, 95% CI:1.58–1.80, P < 0.00001; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot of rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene and risk of psoriasis

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

The sensitivity of rs610604 and rs17728338 analysis were visually illustrated by Figs. 5 and 6. The publication bias was shown by the Egger’s test plots of rs610604 (P = 0.755) and rs17728338 (P = 0.616) (Figs. 7 and 8), suggesting that there was no statistically significant publication bias.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Sensitivity analysis of rs610604 in TNFAIP3 gene and risk of psoriasis

Fig. 6
figure 6

Sensitivity analysis of rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene and risk of psoriasis

Fig. 7
figure 7

Egger’s test for rs610604 in TNFAIP3 gene and risk of psoriasis

Fig. 8
figure 8

Egger’s test for rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene and risk of psoriasis

Functional analysis

The functional analysis was undertaken by using HaploReg are displayed in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

HaploReg view of rs610604 in TNFAIP3 and rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene using HaploReg version 4.1 ( a rs610604; b rs17728338


Although the precise mechanism of human psoriasis remains somewhat enigmatic. It is increasingly recognized that strong genetic predisposition act as an intrinsic factor for psoriasis pathogenesis, and SNPs in the human genome may be one of the keys to unlock insights into the genetic basis for the occurrence, development and relapse of psoriasis [32, 33]. As intrinsic factors, polymorphisms in TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 gene has garnered considerable attention over the past decade years by different research teams all over the world.

Our results indicated that there is a statistically higher frequency of the rs610604 G in psoriasis patients. Most individual studies were in accordance with the result analysis by synthesis. The results of the meta-analysis remained unchanged when we conducted the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. For rs17728338, the pooled outcome illustrated that the A allele of rs17728338 has a significantly increased risk for psoriasis. To further explore the underlying mechanisms of the interaction of TNFAIP3 and TNIP1, the HaploReg 4.1 online database was used to predict the functions of the two loci in silico. According to HaploReg, enhancer histone marks for rs610604 were found in 5 different human tissues, while enhancer histone marks for rs17728338 were found in 9 different human tissues. Both rs610604 and rs17728338 were in linkage disequilibrium with numerous other loci using a threshold of r2 ≥ 0.8. Regulatory motifs changed were found in both rs610604 and rs17728338. These in silico information may help to have a better understanding of the functions of the two loci, and functional experiments are strongly needed to validate these hypotheses in the future.

A20 was first characterized as a cytokine-inducible factor by a seminal study of Dixit, V. M. et al. in 1990 [34]. After that, in the year of 2004, Dixit and co-workers discovered that A20 was involved in TNF-induced NF-кB activation by playing the role of dual ubiquitin-editing enzyme [35, 36]. Dysregulation of A20 expression was found to be associated with inflammatory and autoimmune disease such as psoriasis as well as the pathogenesis of cancer over the past few years. Jiang et al.’s study [37] suggested that TNFAIP3 mRNA expression level significantly correlated with the severity and pathology of psoriasis. Other studies on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and type 2 diabetes reported that some of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could influence the expression level of the TNFAIP3 [38, 39]. As for cancer involvement, A20 mRNA was found to be upregulated in the poorly differentiated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the skin while no A20 mRNA is observed in normal tissues samples [40]. The molecular mechanism of A20 functions underlying these biological processes is generally characterized as the inhibitory effect of NF-κB activation by editing the ubiquitylation status of its numerous proximal signaling proteins such as receptor-interacting protein serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIPK1), TNF Receptor Associated Factor 6 (TRAF6), Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Translocation Protein 1 (MALT1), etc. [41, 42] Apart from NF-κB signalling pathway, A20 has also been reported to be involved in the regulation of other signalling circuits including Wnt pathway, interferon regulatory factor (IRF) pathway, etc. [43, 44] There were also studies focusing on blocking autophagy and anti-apoptotic activities by deubiquitination [45]. However, the exact mechanisms by which it does this remains unclear. More researches are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying them.

One of the most critical A20 binding protein is TNFAIP3 Interacting Protein 1 (TNIP1), which has another alias of ABIN-1. It has been reported that TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 physically interact with each other to inhibit cell death and NF-κB signalling pathway [46, 47]. Similar with TNFAIP3, more than 3 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) indicated that TNIP1 had been implicated in numerous inflammatory disease, including psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [19, 27, 48,49,50]. It is probably that A20 collaborate with TNIP1 to be involved in the pathophysiology of these diseases.

To date, this is the first comprehensive study on the correlation between TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 polymorphisms and psoriasis vulnerability. However, several drawbacks should not be overlooked. First, as far as a limited number of studies are concerned, although we have collected all the currently related data, false negatives of our study may exist. Second, the genetic factor for psoriasis is composed of multiple genes and loci. However, we only concentrated on rs610604 in TNIP1 and rs17328338 in TNFAIP3 in this work. Third, only the allele model was used to analyze the data. Other genetic models are strongly recommended to be used as long as there are enough future relevant researches. Fourth, the HWE of some included studies were missing, which may lead to Information bias. Finally, only studies published in English were finally included in the present study, which may lead to selection bias.


The results of our meta-analysis suggested that G allele of rs610604 polymorphisms in TNFAIP3 and A allele of rs17728338 polymorphisms in TNIP1 were considered to have an increased risk for psoriasis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this paper.



Single nucleotide polymorphism


China National Knowledge Infrastructure


Newcastle–Ottawa scale


Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Induced Protein 3


TNFAIP3 Interacting Protein 1


Odds ratio


Confidence interval


Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium


Genome-wide association study


Receptor-interacting protein serine/threonine kinase 1


TNF Receptor Associated Factor 6


Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Translocation Protein 1


Interferon regulatory factor


Systemic lupus erythematosus


Systemic sclerosis


Rheumatoid arthritis


  1. Di Meglio P, Villanova F, Nestle FO. Psoriasis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(8).

  2. Weigle N, McBane S. Psoriasis. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(9):626–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boehncke WH, Schon MP. Psoriasis. Lancet (London, England). 2015;386(9997):983–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takeshita J, Grewal S, Langan SM, et al. Psoriasis and comorbid diseases: epidemiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):377–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(2):377–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perera GK, Di Meglio P, Nestle FO. Psoriasis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:385–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boehncke WH. Etiology and pathogenesis of psoriasis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2015;41(4):665–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Capon F. The Genetic Basis of Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12).

  9. Liang Y, Sarkar MK, Tsoi LC, Gudjonsson JE. Psoriasis: a mixed autoimmune and autoinflammatory disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;49:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Boone DL, Turer EE, Lee EG, et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of toll-like receptor responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(10):1052–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans PC, Ovaa H, Hamon M, et al. Zinc-finger protein A20, a regulator of inflammation and cell survival, has de-ubiquitinating activity. Biochem J. 2004;378(Pt 3):727–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Caster DJ, Korte EA, Nanda SK, et al. ABIN1 dysfunction as a genetic basis for lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(11):1743–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Musone SL, Taylor KE, Lu TT, et al. Multiple polymorphisms in the TNFAIP3 region are independently associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2008;40(9):1062–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vereecke L, Beyaert R, van Loo G. The ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 (TNFAIP3) is a central regulator of immunopathology. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(8):383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bowes J, Orozco G, Flynn E, et al. Confirmation of TNIP1 and IL23A as susceptibility loci for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(9):1641–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haase O, Mosaad H, Eldarouti MA, et al. TNFAIP3 and IL12B gene polymorphisms associated with psoriasis vulgaris in an Egyptian cohort. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(7):1297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Indhumathi S, Rajappa M, Chandrashekar L, Ananthanarayanan PH, Thappa DM, Negi VS. TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 polymorphisms confer psoriasis risk in south Indian Tamils. Br J Biomed Sci. 2015;72(4):168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li XL, Yu H, Wu GS. Investigating the genetic association of HCP5, SPATA2, TNIP1, TNFAIP3 and COG6 with psoriasis in Chinese population. Int J Immunogenet. 2014;41(6):503–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang Q, Liu H, Qu L, et al. Investigation of 20 non-HLA (human leucocyte antigen) psoriasis susceptibility loci in Chinese patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(5):1060–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Ma Y, Zhang Z, et al. Identification of two loci associated with generalized Pustular psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(8):2132–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang C, Zhu KJ, Liu H, et al. The TNFAIP3 polymorphism rs610604 both associates with the risk of psoriasis vulgaris and affects the clinical severity. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40(4):426–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Munir S, Ber Rahman S, Rehman S, et al. Association analysis of GWAS and candidate gene loci in a Pakistani population with psoriasis. Mol Immunol. 2015;64(1):190–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nair RP, Duffin KC, Helms C, et al. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):199–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikamo P, Lysell J, Stahle M. Association with genetic variants in the IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways discriminates between mild and severe psoriasis skin disease. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(8):1969–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Villarreal-Martinez A, Gallardo-Blanco H, Cerda-Flores R, et al. Candidate gene polymorphisms and risk of psoriasis: a pilot study. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11(4):1217–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Das S, Stuart PE, Ding J, et al. Fine mapping of eight psoriasis susceptibility loci. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(6):844–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Han JW, Wang Y, Alateng C, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced protein 3 interacting protein 1 gene polymorphisms and Pustular psoriasis in Chinese Han population. Chin Med J. 2016;129(13):1519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ray-Jones H, Eyre S, Barton A, Warren RB. One SNP at a time: moving beyond GWAS in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(3):567–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Linares-Pineda TM, Canadas-Garre M, Sanchez-Pozo A, Calleja-Hernandez MA. Gene polymorphisms as predictors of response to biological therapies in psoriasis patients. Pharmacol Res. 2016;113(Pt A):71–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dixit VM, Green S, Sarma V, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induction of novel gene products in human endothelial cells including a macrophage-specific chemotaxin. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(5):2973–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wertz IE, O'Rourke KM, Zhou H, et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature. 2004;430(7000):694–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Opipari AW Jr, Hu HM, Yabkowitz R, Dixit VM. The A20 zinc finger protein protects cells from tumor necrosis factor cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(18):12424–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jiang X, Tian H, Fan Y, et al. Expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 3 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells negatively correlates with disease severity in psoriasis vulgaris. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(12):1938–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Adrianto I, Wen F, Templeton A, et al. Association of a functional variant downstream of TNFAIP3 with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2011;43(3):253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Boonyasrisawat W, Eberle D, Bacci S, et al. Tag polymorphisms at the A20 (TNFAIP3) locus are associated with lower gene expression and increased risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56(2):499–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Codd JD, Salisbury JR, Packham G, Nicholson LJ. A20 RNA expression is associated with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and poorly differentiated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol. 1999;187(5):549–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hymowitz SG, Wertz IE. A20: from ubiquitin editing to tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(5):332–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vereecke L, Beyaert R, van Loo G. Genetic relationships between A20/TNFAIP3, chronic inflammation and autoimmune disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39(4):1086–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shao L, Oshima S, Duong B, et al. A20 restricts wnt signaling in intestinal epithelial cells and suppresses colon carcinogenesis. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Saitoh T, Yamamoto M, Miyagishi M, et al. A20 is a negative regulator of IFN regulatory factor 3 signaling. J Immunol. 2005;174(3):1507–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Catrysse L, Vereecke L, Beyaert R, van Loo G. A20 in inflammation and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2014;35(1):22–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Parvatiyar K, Harhaj EW. Regulation of inflammatory and antiviral signaling by A20. Microbes Infect. 2011;13(3):209–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mauro C, Pacifico F, Lavorgna A, et al. ABIN-1 binds to NEMO/IKKgamma and co-operates with A20 in inhibiting NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(27):18482–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kawasaki A, Ito S, Furukawa H, et al. Association of TNFAIP3 interacting protein 1, TNIP1 with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population: a case-control association study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(5):R174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Allanore Y, Saad M, Dieude P, et al. Genome-wide scan identifies TNIP1, PSORS1C1, and RHOB as novel risk loci for systemic sclerosis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(7):e1002091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Gallagher J, Howlin J, McCarthy C, et al. Identification of Naf1/ABIN-1 among TNF-alpha-induced expressed genes in human synoviocytes using oligonucleotide microarrays. FEBS Lett. 2003;551(1–3):8–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



HBG produced the idea, designed the work and finished writing the first draft. HBG and STG did literature retrieval and data acquisition, respectively. STG completed data analyses by using software. XJK and XJW participated in the manuscript revision and contributed some essential original ideas in our manuscript. XMP has rigorously revised the final draft and was responsible for all data analysis results. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiong-ming Pu, Xiao-jing Kang or Xiu-juan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All original data used in this study were based on previously published literature and online public databases, and no human participants were included. Therefore, ethical approval and patient consent were unnecessary in this work.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there was no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, Hb., Gao, St., Pu, Xm. et al. Association of rs610604 in TNFAIP3 and rs17728338 in TNIP1 gene polymorphisms with psoriasis susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. BMC Med Genet 21, 103 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Psoriasis
  • TNIP1 single nucleotide polymorphism
  • Meta-analysis