Skip to main content

Post-lingual non-syndromic hearing loss phenotype: a polygenic case with 2 biallelic mutations in MYO15A and MITF



Hearing loss (HL) represents the most common congenital sensory impairment with an incidence of 1–5 per 1000 live births. Non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) is an isolated finding that is not part of any other disorder accounting for 70% of all genetic hearing loss cases.


In the current study, we reported a polygenic mode of inheritance in an NSHL consanguineous family using exome sequencing technology and we evaluated the possible effect of the detected single nucleotide variants (SNVs) using in silico methods.


Two bi-allelic SNVs were detected in the affected patients; a MYO15A (. p.V485A) variant, and a novel MITF (p.P338L) variant. Along with these homozygous mutations, we detected two heterozygous variants in well described hearing loss genes (MYO7A and MYH14). The novel MITF p. Pro338Leu missense mutation was predicted to change the protein structure and function.


A novel MITF mutation along with a previously described MYO15A mutation segregate with an autosomal recessive non-syndromic HL case with a post-lingual onset. The findings highlight the importance of carrying whole exome sequencing for a comprehensive assessment of HL genetic heterogeneity.

Peer Review reports


With a prevalence of 1 to 5 per 1000 births, hearing loss (HL) represents the most common congenital sensory impairment. Congenital hearing loss could be either due to hereditary/non-hereditary genetic factors, or due to certain complications during pregnancy and childbirth [1]. Most of the cases (~ 60%) are attributed to genetic causes with more than 150 genes identified to be associated with either syndromic or non-syndromic form of this disease [2, 3]. Non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) accounts for 70% of genetic HL cases that are usually not associated with other signs and symptoms. NSHL can be inherited either in an autosomal recessive manner (75–80%), autosomal dominant manner (20–25%), X- linked or in rare cases by mitochondrial inheritance (1–2%) [4]. Up to date, over 115 genes have been linked to non-syndromic HL with GJB2, SLC26A4, MYO15A, OTOF, and CDH23 being considered as the most commonly identified genes. Some of these genes were shown to be associated with both recessive and dominant form of the disease [5, 6].

With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), genetic mapping within large, clinically well-characterized families with NSHL provides a powerful approach for mapping critical chromosomal intervals which when mutated could be responsible for this phenotype. In the Middle East, the high rate of consanguineous marriages favors the incidence of autosomal recessive diseases such as that of NSHL [7]. Unfortunately, despite this high prevalence, the needed genetic linkage studies using NGS technologies are still not very well established [8].

In this study, we report a polygenic mode of inheritance in an NSHL consanguineous family using exome sequencing analysis. Accordingly, we propose for the first time the involvement of a novel MITF variant along with a previously described MYO15A mutation in non-syndromic HL disease with post-lingual onset.



Two young siblings presented to the Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at American University of Beirut (AUB) with a complaint of late-onset HL. These patients, along with their consanguineous family, were included in the ongoing study of the genetic basis of HL in Lebanon. Family members received a complete otolaryngologic examination, in addition to pure tone audiometry testing. They were also referred to Ophthalmology, Cardiology and Nephrology for identification of possible other congenital abnormalities and ruling out syndromic HL. A follow-up examination was done for one available affected patient (II.5) and her parents after 4 years from the first visit. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the American University of Beirut (protocol number:OTO.MB1.02).

Exome sequencing

Blood samples were collected from the family members and DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen Sciences, Inc., Germantown, MD), using the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantification was also performed through the NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA) at the molecular core facility at AUB. One microgram of coded DNA samples from both parents and the two patients were shipped to Macrogen (South Korea), where exome sequencing was performed using the V5 SureSelect Target Enrichment Capture system from Agilent on a HiSeq 4000 platform from Illumina.

Data analysis

Primary analysis was done at Macrogen. Generated FASTQ files were mapped to the reference genome using the SureCall software from Agilent technologies. The Illimuna Variant Studio was used for annotation and variant calls. The Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) was also used as a high-performance visualization tool for genomic annotations [9]. To assess the pathogenicity of possible candidates, we used SIFT (http://sift., PolyPhen2 ( pph2/),MutationTaster (, and GERP++ ( SidowLab/downloads/gerp/) scores to predict deleterious variants. To predict the effect of the detected mutations on the protein structure and stability, we used DUET software (


Clinical manifestation

The family consists of consanguineous parents with two sisters diagnosed with post-lingual hearing impairment and four unaffected brothers (Fig. 1). HL was noted in the two sisters (II.5/II.6) at the age of six and twelve, respectively. Physical examination did not demonstrate any dysmorphic features suggestive of a syndromic disease. Both patients were reported not to have any pigmentary changes in hair, eyes, or skin. No visual complaints including night blindness, visual field loss and decrease in central vision were detected. Audiogram analysis of this family revealed that the two siblings had a bilateral HL. Puretone audiometry for patients revealed approximately similar pattern of a “cookie-bite audiogram” with mild HL in the low frequencies, sloping to borderline severe in mid frequencies, and rising to moderate in high frequencies (Fig. 2). Word discrimination score was excellent for both patients at the time of referral.

Fig. 1

Family’s phenotype and genotype. The pedigree of the enrolled family, with affected individuals marked in grey. Possible causative variants of the affected sisters and those of the parents are listed

Fig. 2

Audiograms of the affected probands. The audiograms show mild to severe progressive hearing loss in both ears for both affected individuals (II.5) and (II.6). The audiograms were taken at the time of diagnosis

A follow-up audiogram for the patient (II.5) indicated a stable hearing after 4 years from the initial diagnosis. In addition no features of any syndromic disease that are usually initiated after puberty were detected.

Mutational analysis

Exome sequencing of the four family members achieved approximately (95%) mean exome coverage, at coverage of (8X). From a total number of around 58,000 variants, we only analyzed those that occur in the coding regions of the genes. We filtered variants via a list of 155 genes used for clinical diagnosis of HL while including only missense, frameshift, splice and stop gained alterations with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of < 0.01 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Possible causative variants for each patient were summarized in (Additional file 2: Tables S2 and Additional file 3: Tables S3). The strong candidate variants that might underlie the mild to moderate NSHL in the two patients were those detected in MITF, MYO15A, MYO7A, and MYH14 genes (Fig. 1, 10].

Two bi-allelic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected in the two patients; a previously described MYO15A (NM_016239.3:c.1454 T > C) mutation and a novel MITF variant (NM_198159.2:c.1013C > T) resulting in the missense mutations p.V485A and p.P338L respectively (Additional file 2: Table S2). Moreover, on the top of the variants that were detected amongst the known HL genes were: 1- a mono-allelic variant in MYO7A (NM_000260.3:c.5563C > T) resulting in the nonsense mutation p.Q1855* inherited from the mother, and2- a heterozygous variant in MYH14 (NM_001145809.1:c.1150G > T) inherited from the father. (Fig. 1 and Additional file 2: Table S2).

Finally, a search for unbiased bi-allelic mutations in the family did not yield additional variants with a MAF < 1% except for TRPV2 (rs756373391). The latter is a close member of the TRPV4 gene that is implicated in some cases of HL (Additional file 4: Tables S4 and Additional file 5: Tables S5).

In silico prediction and modulation for the novel MITF variant

We focused our analysis on the NM_198159.2:c.1013C > T variant in MITF because it lies on the boundary of exon8 and as such could lead either to a missense mutation and/or alternative splicing (Fig. 3). We evaluated the possible effect of the = p. Pro338Leu missense variant on the structure and function of the MITF protein using different in silico predictive software. The proline residue at position 338 lies within the α-helix of the bHLH motif domain (Fig. 4). The amino acid substitution in the MITF protein is predicted to be damaging by Polyphen2 (score 1; range 0–1 with 0 = benign and 1 = probably damaging). SIFT predicts that the substitution is tolerated (score 0.92; a score ≤ 0.05 predicts the change to be damaging and > 0.05 predicts it to be tolerated). However, mutation taster predicts the substitution to be disease causing with a probability of 1 (0–1) (Table 1). In order to better assess this perturbation on the protein structure and its DNA binding activity, we performed an in silico protein stimulation assay, using the modelled-crystal structure of the bHLH domain of MITF (Fig. 4a) bound to DNA (PDB#4ATI). Interestingly, both the murine and human MITF proteins shared high identity in their amino acids bHLH domain including the Proline residue at position 338 which is highly conserved among species (Fig. 4b). Molecular modeling predicts that substitution of proline for leucine can destabilize the protein (NMA Based Predictions ΔΔG ENCoM: 0.207 kcal/mol) (Fig. 5). Therefore, it is expected that this missense mutation changes the structure of the protein, thus, affecting protein function either by disrupting its homotypic/heterotypic dimerization, its DNA binding affinities, or its interaction with partners.

Fig. 3

Chromosomal localization of the MITF missense mutation. The NM_198159.2:c.1013C > T variant on chromosome 3 is visualized Using the IGV software. Both parents (I.1 and I.2) carry the heterozygous form (blue and red), whereas both affected daughters carry the homozygous form (red). The amino acids are shown in the lower panel below their corresponding codons, whereas a straight blue line was shown under the nucleotides that correspond to the intronic region

Fig. 4

Structural Characterization of the P338 residue. The mouse bHLH amino acid sequence (a) used for depicting the crystal structure of MITF bound to DNA showing the position of the corresponding P338 residue (red circle and arrow) is highly identical to the human sequence (b). The position of the proline residue at position 338 (referred to as Pro 237) is to the outside of the interface of the dimerization interface between two molecules of the mouse MITF bHLH domain (c). (adapted from

Table 1 Pathogenicity scores of detected variants assessed by SIFT, PolyPhen2, Mutation Taster, and GERP++ software
Fig. 5

Protein structure prediction of the novel MITF variant (p.P338L). In silico modeling (a) the effect of the MITF mutation using the DUET software shows a general destabilization of the structure (b). Wild-type and mutant residues are colored in light-green and are also represented as sticks alongside with the surrounding residues which are involved on any type of interactions (a). The magnitude of the fluctuation is represented by thin to thick tube colored blue (low), white (moderate) and red (high) (b)


Although consanguinity can facilitate the discovery of novel genes associated with many diseases, yet it challenges the concept of single causative genetic variant [3]. Interestingly, in this study we revealed a polygenic inheritance of NSHL with the liaison of two independent homozygous alterations in well-known HL genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report the implication of a novel MITF variant in an NSHL case with an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance and a post-lingual onset.

MYO15A and MITF homozygous alterations: the dilemma of predictive tools?

MYO15A encodes for XVA myosin protein which plays a vital role in the elongation and development of stereocilia and actin filaments. More than forty MYO15 mutations have been reported in the motor domain of the protein with generally autosomal recessive HL impairment characterized by a profound phenotype at all frequencies [10]. The detected homozygous MYO15A mutation, p.V485A, was previously associated with a HL phenotype in an Iranian family [3]. Mutations in the N-terminal domain are thought to be associated with a milder form of HL since they can affect only one of the two major isoforms of the gene [11]. Although the p.V485A mutation is located within the N-terminal domain, our indexed patients suffer from a mild to severe phenotype. In addition, two healthy individuals from the Gnomad Exome database harbor this variant which argue against a major role for this mutation in the affected individuals. Accordingly, we postulate that other players might be linked, in collaboration or independent of MYO15A, to the underlying phenotype.

We therefore considered the second shared bi-allelic novel MITF gene mutation p. P338L between the two sisters. MITF encodes the melanocyte-specific promoter of microphthalmia-associated bHLH transcription factor. A total of more than forty MITF mutations have been verified to be disease-causing in patients with either the Waardenburg’s syndrome type 2)WS2) (OMIM#193510) or the Tietz syndrome (OMIM #103500, 12]. Both syndromes are autosomal dominant and are characterized by overlapping phenotypes that encompass HL and pigmentary abnormalities with variable penetrance. To the best of our knowledge, only 2 homozygous MITF cases were detected in WS2 and WS4 [13, 14]. In the present study, the detected homozygous p.P338L missense mutation was neither reported in the dbSNP database, nor in the Gnomad Exome/Genome database. It was also absent from more than 300 Lebanese exomes. The heterozygous frequency of this variant is less than 0.00001 in these databases as it is only present in 3 individuals. Since the detected MITF misssense mutation is localized in the bHLH DNA-binding domain and since the in-silico analysis revealed a deleterious effect prediction, we accordingly hypothesize that this mutation is disease causing (Table 1). Thus, structural and functional assays are compulsory to assess the effect of this mutation on the ability of MITF to heterodimerize, bind DNA, and/or translocate to the nucleus.

Patients who previously presented with HL as the only phenotypic feature were thought to have NSHL. In consequence, only mutations in genes associated with this type of HL were investigated. On the other hand, some SHL cases require special confirmatory tests since the penetrance of secondary features is either incomplete or age dependent. One example is the Usher syndrome which is presented as an NSHL case early-on in life as the onset of the secondary symptom (retinitis pigmentosa) does not appear until puberty. This might cause a false clinical classification of some patients with SHL who can benefit from the appropriate implementation of visual rehabilitation at early stages [6]. Therefore, it is very critical to categorize genes and variants that are either specific to each type or involved in both forms of HL. Another example is the heterozygous MITF (p.R110X) variant that was specifically associated with SHL cases but was recently detected in an NSHL case that presented in the absence of WS2 common features (no pigmentary changes in hair, eyes, or skin) [15]. Originally in-vivo studies on the phenotypic variation seen with the different alleles of the mouse MITF gene referred to as mi gene suggests that mutations in the human MITF gene may also manifest themselves in different ways. This proposed a possibility for detecting phenotypes different from the characteristic WS2 phenotype among patients with MITF mutations [16]. Combining these facts with our results, we propose expanding the implications of MITF variants from syndromic to non-syndromic HL cases while associating it with an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance.

Additionally, it is widely known that most mutations in autosomal dominant loci cause post-lingual hearing impairment (including MYO7A and MYH14) while mutations in autosomal recessive HL cases with delayed childhood onset are rare clinical findings [17]. Herein, we are the first to propose MITF and MYO15A variants as autosomal recessive loci causing stable post-lingual hearing impairment rather than a progressive pre-lingual one.

Polygenic inheritance

Although most genetic deafness cases result from mutations in a single gene, an emerging number of examples are being documented where recessive mutations at two loci are being involved. For example, the digenic interaction that underlies the cause of deafness in individuals carrying a single mutation at the GJB2 locus along with a deletion in the functionally related GJB6 gene [18]. Moreover, a study done by al. on twelve patients with MITF mutations demonstrated a large range of variability in phenotype among these patients which argue for the possible interaction with modifier loci [19]. Herein, we propose a polygenic form of inheritance mainly through the implication of both MITF and MYO15A variants coupled with two detected heterozygous variants in MYO7A and MYH14 genes. Different compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations related to MYO7A have been reported in a variety of autosomal recessive Usher Syndrome families [20]. However, mutations in MYH14 gene are associated with autosomal dominant hearing impairment [21]. Thus, we speculate an involvement of the detected MYH14 and MYO7A mutations in the observed phenotype but not as the direct independent cause of HL since the parents presented as healthy carriers. Further functional studies are needed to assess the independent and combined effect of these mutations on the development of HL.

Finally, we could not rule out other genetic/epigenetic modifiers that could be associated with the underlying phenotype, especially that a growing number of studies have showed that copy number variation (CNV) is widely encountered in syndromic and non-syndromic HL cases [22,23,24]. Such studies would require a case-control study with a substantial number of patients with SHL, NSHL, and controls.


The present study describes a rare form of hereditary non-syndromic autosomal recessive post-lingual sensorineural HL that is associated with polygenic inheritance mode of bi- and mono- allelic variants. In this study, we unraveled the association of a novel MITF variant in NSHL along with a previously described mutation in MYO15A associated with a mild form of HL. We highlighted the importance of clinical exome sequencing for a comprehensive addressing of genetic heterogeneity of HL and in detecting novel variants associated with NSHL.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request. Exome sequencing files are available for sharing with any researcher or research team through a direct request process to the corresponding authors. The novel MITF mutation was submitted to ClinVar under accession number: SCV001035077.



Hearing loss


Next Generation Sequencing


Non-syndromic hearing loss


Single Nucleotide Variants


Waardenburg’s Syndrome


  1. 1.

    Korver AMH, Smith RJH, Van Camp G, Schleiss MR, Bitner-Glindzicz MAK, Lustig LR, et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:16094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Abou Tayoun AN, Al Turki SH, Oza AM, Bowser MJ, Hernandez AL, Funke BH, et al. Improving hearing loss gene testing: a systematic review of gene evidence toward more efficient next-generation sequencing–based diagnostic testing and interpretation. Genet Med. 2016;18(6):545–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sloan-Heggen CM, Babanejad M, Beheshtian M, Simpson AC, Booth KT, Ardalani F, et al. Characterising the spectrum of autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss in Iran. 2015.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Venkatesh MD, Moorchung N, Puri B. Genetics of non syndromic hearing loss. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(4):363–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hu S, Sun F, Zhang J, Tang Y, Qiu J, Wang Z, et al. Genetic etiology study of ten Chinese families with Nonsyndromic hearing loss. Neural Plast. 2018 Jul;2018:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Likar T, Hasanhodžić M, Teran N, Maver A, Peterlin B, Writzl K. Diagnostic outcomes of exome sequencing in patients with syndromic or non-syndromic hearing loss. Janecke AR, editor. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0188578.

  7. 7.

    Barake R, Abou-Rizk S, Nemer G, Bassim M. The OTOGL p.Arg925* variant is associated with moderate hearing loss in a Syrian nonconsanguineous family. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017;21(7):445–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mustapha M. Autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss in the Lebanese population: prevalence of the 30delG mutation and report of two novel mutations in the connexin 26 (GJB2) gene. J Med Genet. 2001;38(10):36e–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol [Internet]. 2011;29(1):24–6 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 13].

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang MY, Kim AR, Kim NKD, Lee C, Lee KY, Jeon W-S, et al. Identification and clinical implications of novel MYO15A mutations in a non-consanguineous Korean family by targeted exome sequencing. Mol Cells. 2015;38(9):781–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Crespo M, van Dalum G, Ferraldeschi R, Zafeiriou Z, Sideris S, Lorente D, et al. Androgen receptor expression in circulating tumour cells from castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with novel endocrine agents. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(7):1166–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen L, Guo W, Ren L, Yang M, Zhao Y, Guo Z, et al. A de novo silencer causes elimination of MITF-M expression and profound hearing loss in pigs. BMC Biol [Internet]. 2016;14(1):52 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 7].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Potrony M, Puig-Butille JA, Aguilera P, Badenas C, Tell-Marti G, Carrera C, et al. Prevalence of MITF p.E318K in Patients With Melanoma Independent of the Presence of CDKN2A Causative Mutations. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(4):405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pang X, Zheng X, Kong X, Chai Y, Wang Y, Qian H, et al. A homozygous MITF mutation leads to familial Waardenburg syndrome type 4. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2018;179(2):ajmg.a.60693.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bademci G, Cengiz FB, Foster J II, Duman D, Sennaroglu L, Diaz-Horta O, et al. Variations in multiple Syndromic deafness genes mimic non-syndromic hearing loss. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):31622.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Steingrímsson E, Nii A, Fisher DE, Ferré-D’Amaré AR, McCormick RJ, Russell LB, et al. The semidominant mi(b) mutation identifies a role for the HLH domain in DNA binding in addition to its role in protein dimerization. EMBO J. 1996;15(22):6280–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS, Smith RJ. Hereditary Hearing Loss and Deafness Overview. GeneReviews®. Seattle: University of Washington; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nance WE. The genetics of deafness. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003 Jan;9(2):109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Léger S, Balguerie X, Goldenberg A, Drouin-Garraud V, Cabot A, Amstutz-Montadert I, et al. Novel and recurrent non-truncating mutations of the MITF basic domain: genotypic and phenotypic variations in Waardenburg and Tietz syndromes. Eur J Hum Genet [Internet]. 2012;20(5):584–7 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 13].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ayub Medical College. R, Ayub M. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad : JAMC. Vol. 29, Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. Ayub Medical College; 1988. 671–676 p.

  21. 21.

    Kim K-Y, Kovács M, Kawamoto S, Sellers JR, Adelstein RS. Disease-associated mutations and alternative splicing alter the enzymatic and motile activity of nonmuscle myosins II-B and II-C. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(24):22769–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shearer A, Kolbe DL, Azaiez H, Sloan CM, Frees KL, Weaver AE, et al. Copy number variants are a common cause of non-syndromic hearing loss. Genome Med [Internet]. 2014;6(5):37 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 13].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Haraksingh RR, Jahanbani F, Rodriguez-Paris J, Gelernter J, Nadeau KC, Oghalai JS, et al. Exome sequencing and genome-wide copy number variant mapping reveal novel associations with sensorineural hereditary hearing loss. BMC Genomics [Internet]. 2014;(1):15, 1155 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 13].

  24. 24.

    Vona B, MAH H, Schröder J, Shehata-Dieler W, Nanda I, Haaf T. Hereditary hearing loss SNP-microarray pilot study. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2018;11(1):391 Available from:, [cited 2019 Oct 13].

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the patients and the family for their contribution to this research.


This project was funded by the Medical Practice Plan (MPP) at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information




AK and SBK: did all the experiments, and participate in the analysis and writing up of the manuscript. RB,GD,SAR, and AK did the clinical assessment and recruitment of the patients and their family members. MB and GN designed the study, secured the funding, analyzed the data, and wrote up the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Georges Nemer or Marc Bassim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The entire procedure was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the American University of Beirut (protocol number:OTO.MB1.02) and carried out with written informed consent of the patients, the parents, and/or legal guardians.

Consent for publication

All patients, parents and legal guardians signed an informed consent for data publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

List of hearing loss genes used for filtering variants

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Filtering results from whole exome sequencing for patient II.5 using the 150 genes panel from Supplementary Table 1

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Filtering results from whole exome sequencing for patient II.6 using the 150 genes panel from Supplementary Table 1

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Filtering results from whole exome sequencing for patient II.5 showing only homozygous mutations with a MAF < 5%

Additional file 5: Table S5.

Filtering results from whole exome sequencing for patient II.6 showing only homozygous mutations with a MAF < 5%.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalil, A., Karroum, S.B., Barake, R. et al. Post-lingual non-syndromic hearing loss phenotype: a polygenic case with 2 biallelic mutations in MYO15A and MITF. BMC Med Genet 21, 1 (2020).

Download citation


  • Congenital hearing loss
  • Non-syndromic hearing loss
  • MITF
  • MYO15A
  • Whole exome sequencing