Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Next-generation sequencing reveals a new mutation in the LTBP2 gene associated with microspherophakia in a Spanish family

BMC Medical Genetics201819:77

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-018-0590-0

  • Received: 15 February 2017
  • Accepted: 22 April 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Microspherophakia is a rare autosomal recessive eye disorder characterized by small spherical lens. It may present as an isolated finding or in association with other ocular and/or systemic disorders. This clinical and genetic heterogeneity requires the study of large genes (ADAMTSL4, FBN1, LTBP2, ADAMTSL-10 and ADAMTSL17). The purpose of the present study is to identify the genetic cause of this pathology in a consanguineous Spanish family.

Methods

A clinical exome sequencing experiment was executed by the TruSight One® Sequencing Panel (TSO) from Illumina©. Sanger sequencing was used to validate the NGS results.

Results

Only the insertion of an adenine in exon 36 of the LTBP2 gene (c.5439_5440insA) was associated with pathogenicity. This new mutation was validated by Sanger sequencing and segregation analysis was also performed. Haplotype analyses using the polymorphic markers D14S1025, D14S43 and D14S999 close to the LTBP2 gene indicated identity by descent in this family.

Conclusion

We describe the first case of a microspherophakia phenotype associated with a novel homozygous mutation in the LTBP2 gene in a consanguineous Caucasian family by means of NGS technology.

Keywords

  • Microspherophakia
  • LTBP2 gene
  • NGS
  • Clinical exome sequencing
  • TruSight one sequencing panel

Background

Microspherophakia (MSP, OMIM 251750) is a rare autosomal recessive (AR) eye disorder characterized by small spherical lens. It may present either as an isolated finding or in association with other ocular anomalies such as megalocornea, ectopia lentis and secondary glaucoma, or with hereditary systemic disorders such as Marfan syndrome and Weill-Marchesani syndrome. These two latter conditions are caused by mutations in the FBN1 gene, whose protein product fibrillin-1 (FBN1) is a major structural component of the microfibrils. Three additional genes of the ADAMTS family (4, 10 and 17) have been associated with some of these conditions, from isolated ectopia lentis to Weill-Marchesani syndrome. In patients with microspherophakia or other ocular anomalies, such as megalocornea, myopia, congenital primary glaucoma or secondary glaucoma, mutations have been found in the LTBP2 gene. Isolated microspherophakia (IM), without any other ocular feature, has been recently been linked to the LTBP2 gene [1]. This latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2 (LTBP2) gene is considered one of the major known causative genes for MSP.

The FBN1 gene, with 65 exons extending over 200 kb of genomic DNA, codes for the main protein of extra-cellular microfibrils: Fibrillin-1. It is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in connective tissue. The LTBP2 gene, 114 kb long and organized into 22 exons, is the largest member of the LTBP family. The coded protein shows strong structural homologues with the fibrillins. Because the C-terminal region of the LTBP2 protein specifically binds to the N-terminal region of fibrillin-1, this protein may have a structural role in elastic-fiber architectural organization for LTBP2 [2]. The ADAMTSL4 gene (22 exons/10 Kb of genomic DNA) [3], the ADAMTS10 gene (26 exons/30 Kb of genomic DNA) [4] and the ADAMTS17 gene (24 exons /370Kb) [5] belong to a family of extracellular matrix proteases. It has been postulated that these proteins play either a structural or a regulatory role in the microfibrillar network [6].

The present work describes for the first time the association of a mutation in the LTBP2 gene (c.5439_5440insA) with an isolated microspherophakia phenotype in a consanguineous Caucasian family.

Methods

Clinical evaluation

We studied two siblings from a consanguineous Spanish family with microspherophakia (MSP) (Fig. 1). Both patients underwent a complete ophthalmic and systemic workup, including eco-cardiography and homocystinuria screening. Neither had any cardiovascular, metabolic or musculo skeletal abnormalities.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a Pedigree of the consanguineous Spanish family with microspherophakia and their haplotype study by D14S1025, D14S43 and D14S999 markers close to the LTBP2 gene on chromosome 14. b Electropherograms obtained by Sanger sequencing of the LTBP2 gene showing the c.5439_5440insA mutation detected. The sequences of the parents, where the mutation was detected in heterozygous state, are shown above, and the sequences of the affected patients, in which the added Adenine showed a homozygous peak, are shown below

Bilateral slit lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometer, gonioscopy and fundus examination (through a dilated pupil and using +90D Volk lens) were performed. In both siblings, the slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed that lenses were smaller and more spherical than normal (MSP). The absence of enlarged cornea, buphthalmos, abnormal angle structures or increased IOP excluded primary congenital glaucoma. The diagnosis of isolated MSP was confirmed by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM, Sonomed Inc., New York, USA).

Genetic studies

Genomic DNA was automatically extracted from peripheral leukocytes using the salting out procedure (Autopure, Qiagen). To screen for the presence of mutations in the ADAMTSL4 gene, we sequenced all 20 exons and exon-intron boundaries of the gene (BigDye v1.1 Terminator Reaction Kit on an ABI Prism ® 3500 Dx Capillary DNA Sequencer unit according to manufacturer’s protocol, Life Technologies Corporation). The sequences of primers, annealing temperatures and PCR conditions were adapted from the literature [7].

To perform NGS analyses we used a clinical exome sequencing panel called TruSight One® Sequencing Panel (TSO) from Illumina©. This panel focuses on exonic regions harboring 4813 disease-causing variants. We included all genes that have been associated to date to isolated ectopia lentis (ADAMTS4, FBN1, LTBP2, ADAMTS10, ADAMTS17) in the clinical exome panel. Amplified samples following the TSO protocol were loaded onto the MIseq instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina©). VariantStudio software® (Illumina©) allowed us to analyze the files from the experiment. Sanger sequencing was used to validate the NGS results.

To investigate whether IBD (identity by descent) occurs in the studied family, we performed haplotype analysis of the region containing the LTBP2 gene. We studied three polymorphic markers (D14S1025, D14S43 and D14S999) located on the 5′ up-stream region of the gene. The fragments amplified by dye-labelled primers of the D14S1025, D14S43 and D14S999 markers were analyzed on an ABI Prism ® 3500 Dx Capillary DNA Sequencer (Life Technologies Corporation©). Genotypes were determined using the GeneScan® software package (Perkin Elmer-Applied Biosystems©).

All mutations and genetic variants were numbered according to the first translated base of the sequenced genes (GenBank entry NT_006713) and variant sequences were designated according to standard nomenclature guidelines [8].

In silico studies

To investigate the functional impact of the genomic variations found in the present study, we used the ALAMUT® VISUAL software. This software uses the following relevant prediction tools: i) Splice Site Finder-like, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, Human Splicing Finder and ESE for splicing prediction ii) Align GVGD, SIFT, MutationTaster, PolyPhen-2 and KD4v for missense prediction.

To check all the variants detected in this study the ExAc, the 1000 Genomes Project and the CSVS (Collaborative Spanish Variant Server) databases were consulted.

Results

Clinical results

Figure 1 shows the pedigree of the family studied. Patient II:1 was a 42-year-old man who was referred to our department for progressive visual loss and high lenticular myopia. His medical history was unremarkable. Visual acuity was 20/50 in both eyes. Refractive error was − 22.00/− 0.75 × 780 (OD) and − 21.00/ -0,50 × 1000 (OS). Intraocular pressure was 19 mmHg and 20 mmHg in OD and OS, respectively. Gonioscopy examination showed open angle grade IV 360°. Ophthalmic examination findings were compatible with MSP. The lens had a central nuclear cataract with notable phacodonesis but without subluxation in either eye (Fig. 2). Ultrasound biomicroscopy showed that the equatorial lens diameter was small with an increased antero-posterior diameter, consistent with microspherophakia. UBM also detected the presence of missing and stretched zonular fibers which were compatible with clinical phacodonesis (Fig. 3). A fundoscopic exam showed that optic disk appearance was normal and no pathology was observed. The patient underwent bilateral lensectomy with posterior iris claw intraocular lens implantation that restored vision to 20/20 in both eyes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a Slit lamp photography. b A left eye section performed in patient II.1. shows a small nuclear cataract. The lens is small in diameter and spherical in shape

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Ultrasound biomicroscopy performed in patient II:1. The analysis showed a thickness of 5,32 mm (OD) and 5,35 mm (OS), respectively, and evidence of missing and stretched zonular fibres

Patient II:2 was an asymptomatic 39-year-old woman and the proband’s younger sister. Her visual acuity was normal and IOP was 18 mmHg in both eyes. Gonioscopy examination showed open angle grade IV bilaterally. The ophthalmic examination showed microspherophakia without cataracts or lens dislocation. The fundoscopic exam of the posterior segment was unremarkable and the cup-disk ratio was within normal limits in both eyes.

Genetic results

Taking into account that the ADAMTSL4 gene is considered responsible for most cases of isolated ectopia lentis in the European population [9], we started the present study by sequencing all 20 exons and exon-intron boundaries of this gene. We identified several variants from the reference sequence (Table 1), but none met the requirements to be considered as the molecular cause of the disease in the consanguineous family studied.
Table 1

ADAMTSL4 genetic variants detected in the IEL patients by Sanger sequencing of this gene

 

Exon/Intron

DNA variant

cDNA

Protein

SNP

MAF

State

Patient 1

exon 6

g.150526044 G > C

c.577G > C

p.Ala193Pro

rs41317515

0,443

Het

intron 8

g.150527292 G > A

c.1303 + 182G > A

 

rs9659061

0,452

Het

intron 8

g.150527294 C > T

c.1303 + 184C > T

 

rs12124948

0,338

Het

intron 8

g.150527703_150527704 ins TCAT

c.1304-202_1304-201insTCAT

   

Het

intron 11

g.150529323_150529324 ins TT

c.1818 + 54_1818 + 55insTT

   

Het

exon 16

g.150558532 T > C

c.2511 T > C

p.Asn837Asn

rs1088382

0,156

Hom

exon 16

g.150558574 G > A

c.2553G > A

p.Pro851Pro

rs10749657

0,118

Het

intron 16

g.150558694 C > T

c.2628 + 45C > T

 

rs10749658

0,065

Hom

Patient 2

exon 6

g.150526044 G > C

c.577G > C

p.Ala193Pro

rs41317515

0,443

Het

intron 8

g.150527292 G > A

c.1303 + 182G > A

 

rs9659061

0,452

Het

intron 8

g.150527294 C > T

c.1303 + 184C > T

 

rs12124948

0,338

Het

intron 8

g.150527703_150527704insTCAT

c.1304-202_1304-201insTCAT

   

Het

intron 11

g.150529323_150529324insTT

c.1818 + 54_1818 + 55insTT

   

Het

exon 16

g.150558532 T > C

c.2511 T > C

p.Asn837Asn

rs1088382

0,156

Hom

exon 16

g.150558574 G > A

c.2553G > A

p.Pro851Pro

rs10749657

0,118

Het

intron 16

g.150558694 C > T

c.2628 + 45C > T

 

rs10749658

0,065

Hom

intron 16

g.150531380 T > C

c.2629-58 T > C

 

rs11204664

0,452

Het

Het Heterozygous state, Hom Homozygous state

All the genes associated with ectopia lentis phenotypes to date, (ADAMTSL4, FBN1, LTBP2, ADAMTS10, ADAMTS17) included in the clinical exome employed, revealed several genetic variants in these genes. We analyzed their sequences using VariantStudio software. Two different filters were applied to the NGS panel: a) genetic variants detected in the genes described in the literature causing isolated ectopia lentis; and b) genetic variants detected in any of the 4813 genes analyzed by the panel causing a frameshift or a nonsense mutation. Table 2 shows the genetic variants identified. Only one of them has been associated with a pathogenic effect; the insertion of an adenine in the g.74967613 position of the chromosome 14 (NM_000428: c.5439_5440insA) would cause the appearance of a premature stop codon 30 aminoacids later (p.Pro1814ThrfsX30). This frameshift mutation (c.5439_5440insA) in the LTBP2 gene has not been previously reported.
Table 2

Results of the analyses of the TruSight One Panel using VariantStudio software

Genetic variants detected in the genes described in the literature as responsible for the IEL disease (ADAMTSL4, FBN1, LTBP2, ADAMTS10, ADAMTS17) with a missense, a frameshift or a nonsense mutation. The frameshift c.5439_5440insA mutation in exon 36 of the LTBP2 gene, reported for the first time in this work, is indicated in red. In the “Genotype” column: Hom should read homozygous and Het should read heterozygous

The presence of the c.5439_5440insA mutation in exon 36 of the LTBP2 gene was identified in all four family members by Sanger sequencing. As expected, the two patients were homozygous for the mutation while their parents showed this mutation in a heterozygous state. The study of the polymorphic markers (D14S1025, D14S43 and D14S999) located next to the LTBP2 gene demonstrated that identity by descent (IBD) occurred in this family (Fig. 1).

Finally, we ruled out the presence of the c.5439_5440insA mutation in DNA samples of a Spanish control population (n = 100 blood donors) by Sanger Sequencing. Furthermore, c.5439_5440insA had not been previously reported in the ExAc, the 1000 Genomes Project or the CSVS databases.

Discussion

The present work reports the clinical and genetic study of a Spanish consanguineous family with two cases of isolated microspherophakia. We identified the presence of a novel mutation in the LTBP2 gene: c.5439_5440insA in the two affected siblings. A mutation in this gene causing isolated microspherophakia in Caucasian patients has not been reported previously.

The latest technological advances allow us to obtain NGS results of thousands of unrelated individuals. There are several databases that include the results of many different projects. All this information has allowed us to obtain an amazing statistical power, especially in the research on rare diseases. We have checked that the c.5439_5440insA mutation has not been reported in any of the databases consulted (ExAc, 1000 Genomes Project or CSVS). Thus, the presence of this mutation was not only excluded in the 100 control individuals sequenced during this study, but we were also able to exclude it in more than 67,000 unrelated individuals from the ExAc database (which includes the results of the 1000 genomes project) and in more than 1582 unrelated Spanish individuals from CSVS.

To date, mutations in the LTBP2 gene have been associated with several types of glaucoma. In primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), null mutations in LTBP2 were reported in four consanguineous families of Gypsy ethnicity from Pakistan [2], in three unrelated Iranian families [10], and, more recently, two novel mutations in consanguineous families of Pakistani ancestry were identified using WES [11]. In primary open angle glaucoma, five putative disease-contributing or risk factor mutations in LTBP2 were observed in 42 Iranian patients [12]. All these findings will contribute to the understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with LBPT2 mutations.

Recently, in three consanguineous Saudi families with congenital megalocornea with zonular weakness and childhood lens-related secondary glaucoma it was found that ocular anomaly segregated with homozygous LTBP2 mutations [13]. In two families of Moroccan and Macedonian descent, biallelic null LTBP2 mutations were identified in patients with megalocornea, spherophakia, and secondary glaucoma [14].

Involvement of LTBP2 mutations in hereditary systemic disorders, such as Marfan or Weill-Marchesani syndromes, has also been studied. In a meeting abstract, Mathews et al. reported a missense mutation in the LTBP2 gene in a patient with an atypical MFS. More recently, in their study of Iranian patients, Haji-Seyed-Javadi et al. showed that LTBP2 is a causative gene for Weill-Marchesani syndrome and suggested it plays a role in some clinical features observed in Marfan syndrome patients [15].

Figure 4 schematizes the location of all the LTBP2 mutations published. The correlation between the localization of the mutations and their clinical manifestations has not yet been clearly established. However, it is reasonable to speculate with the intervention of regulatory sequences or other genes with a phenotype-modifying effect, especially in those syndromic phenotype diseases. Nonetheless, the two mutations associated only with microspherophakia, c.5446dupC and c.5439_5440insA are located in the last exon of the LTBP2 gene. In silico studies predict that both frameshift mutations would elongate their respective mutant proteins, producing changes in the amino acid composition of the C-terminal domain of the native protein. Because the interaction between the LTBP2 and the Fibrillin-1 proteins is close to this LTBP2 C-terminal region, we could speculate that the instability of the zonular fibers characteristic in microspherophakia is due to the loss of the association between these two proteins. It has been postulated that the LTBP2 interaction with some members of the TGF-beta family could regulate microfibril storage in the extracellular matrix. An altered regulation due to the presence of an abnormal LTBP2 protein might thus prevent normal growth of the lenses, characteristic of the microspherophakia phenotype [12]. Furthermore, the alignment of the sequences from different species depicted in Fig. 5 shows that the c.5439_5440insA mutation is located in highly conserved residues, indicating its importance for the functionality of the LTBP2 protein.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a Schematic representation of the mutations reported along the LTBP2 gene. The novel c.5439_5440insA mutation in exon 36 at the end of this gene is shown in red. b Schematic representation of the functional domains in the LTBP2 protein

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Conservation analysis across the species of a fragment from exon 36 of the LTBP2 gene where the c.5439_5440insA mutation is located. The genetic region that encompasses the altered amino acid remains highly conserved between species

All previously known cases with mutations in the LTBP2 gene were of Arab ethnicity. The present work describes an isolated microspherophakia phenotype due to a new homozygous mutation in the LTBP2 gene in a Spanish consanguineous family. These new data highlight the value of investigating the involvement of the LTBP2 gene in cases with an isolated microspherophakia phenotype.

The present work reinforces the fact that the new technologies of exome sequencing are becoming a common molecular diagnostic test for rare genetic disorders. Indeed, clinical exome sequencing proved to be an effective tool to identify the causative mutation in the family studied.

Conclusions

We describe a consanguineous Caucasian family showing a microspherophakia phenotype. Next-generation sequencing detected a homozygous novel frameshift mutation in the LTBP2 gene present in the two affected patients. This is the first report of the association of a mutation in the LTBP2 gene and isolated microspherophakia in Caucasians.

Abbreviations

AR: 

Autosomal recessive

CSVS: 

Collaborative Spanish Variant Server

FBN1: 

Fibrillin-1

IBD: 

Identity by descent

IM: 

Isolated microspherophakia

IOP: 

Intraocular pressure measurement

MFS: 

Marfan syndrome

MSP: 

Microspherophakia

NGS: 

Next-generation sequencing

OD: 

Oculus dexter (the right eye)

OS: 

Oculus sinister (the left eye)

PCG: 

Primary congenital glaucoma

TSO: 

TruSight One® Sequencing Panel

UBM: 

Ultrasound biomicroscopy

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the consenting patients and parents who made this study possible.

Availability of data and materials

We do not wish to share data originating from our database in order to protect the anonymity of subjects included in this. Permission has not been obtained to share data widely with other investigators and would require individual consent.

Authors’ contributions

JC received and diagnosed the patients and wrote the clinical data of the manuscript. LA designed and processed the study, interpreted the data, drafted the initial manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. LGQ supported and interpreted the technique and results of the NGS. JT contributed to diagnosis and clinical follow-up of the patients. EM was the MISeq technician. SB and PG provided overall supervision of the study from conception to completion. JC, LG, EM, SB and PG reviewed and revised the initial draft and approved the final draft. LA acts as the guarantor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed written consent was obtained from all the patients involved in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.

Consent for publication

The patients participating in this study signed their consent for the publication of the results obtained. This statement was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department Genetics, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Pare Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
(2)
CIBERER (U705), Barcelona, Spain
(3)
Department Ophthalmology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

References

  1. Kumar A, Duvvari MR, Prabhakaran VC, Shetty JS, Murthy GJ, Blanton SH. A homozygous mutation in LTBP2 causes isolated microspherophakia. Hum Genet. 2010;128(4):365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali M, McKibbin M, Booth A, Parry DA, Jain P, Riazuddin SA, et al. Null mutations in LTBP2 cause primary congenital glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(5):664–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Greene VB, Stoetzel C, Pelletier V, Perdomo-Trujillo Y, Liebermann L, Marion V, et al. Confirmation of ADAMTSL4 mutations for autosomal recessive isolated bilateral ectopia lentis. Ophthalmic Genet. 2010;31(1):47–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagoneau N, Benoist-Lasselin C, Huber C, Faivre L, Megarbane A, Alswaid A, et al. ADAMTS10 mutations in autosomal recessive Weill-Marchesani syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(5):801–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Le Goff C, Cormier-Daire V. The ADAMTS (L) family and human genetic disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(R2):R163–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchner DA, Meisler MH. TSRC1, a widely expressed gene containing seven thrombospondin type I repeats. Gene. 2003;307:23–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahram D, Sato TS, Kohilan A, Tayeh M, Chen S, Leal S, et al. A homozygous mutation in ADAMTSL4 causes autosomal-recessive isolated ectopia lentis. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(2):274–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, Hart RK, Greenblatt MS, McGowan-Jordan J, et al. HGVS recommendations for the description of sequence variants: 2016 update. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(6):564–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Neuhann TM, Artelt J, Neuhann TF, Tinschert S, Rump A. A homozygous microdeletion within ADAMTSL4 in patients with isolated ectopia lentis: evidence of a founder mutation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(2):695–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Narooie-Nejad M, Paylakhi SH, Shojaee S, Fazlali Z, Rezaei Kanavi M, Nilforushan N, et al. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2, LTBP2, cause primary congenital glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(20):3969–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Micheal S, Siddiqui SN, Zafar SN, Iqbal A, Khan MI, den Hollander AI. Identification of novel variants in LTBP2 and PXDN using whole-exome sequencing in developmental and congenital Glaucoma. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159259.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Jelodari-Mamaghani S, Haji-Seyed-Javadi R, Suri F, Nilforushan N, Yazdani S, Kamyab K, et al. Contribution of the latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein 2 gene to etiology of primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Mol Vis. 2013;19:333–47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Alkuraya FS. Congenital megalocornea with zonular weakness and childhood lens-related secondary glaucoma - a distinct phenotype caused by recessive LTBP2 mutations. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2570–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Desir J, Sznajer Y, Depasse F, Roulez F, Schrooyen M, Meire F, et al. LTBP2 null mutations in an autosomal recessive ocular syndrome with megalocornea, spherophakia, and secondary glaucoma. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(7):761–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Haji-Seyed-Javadi R, Jelodari-Mamaghani S, Paylakhi SH, Yazdani S, Nilforushan N, Fan JB, et al. LTBP2 mutations cause Weill-Marchesani and Weill-Marchesani-like syndrome and affect disruptions in the extracellular matrix. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(8):1182–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement