Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Novel intragenic deletions within the UBE3A gene in two unrelated patients with Angelman syndrome: case report and review of the literature

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:137

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-017-0500-x

Received: 28 February 2017

Accepted: 14 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Patients with Angelman syndrome (AS) are affected by severe intellectual disability with absence of speech, distinctive dysmorphic craniofacial features, ataxia and a characteristic behavioral phenotype. AS is caused by the lack of expression in neurons of the UBE3A gene, which is located in the 15q11.2-q13 imprinted region. Functional loss of UBE3A is due to 15q11.2-q13 deletion, mutations in the UBE3A gene, paternal uniparental disomy and genomic imprinting defects.

Case presentation

We report here two patients with clinical features of AS referred to our hospital for clinical follow-up and genetic diagnosis. Methylation Specific-Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) of the 15q11.2-q13 region was carried out in our laboratory as the first diagnostic tool detecting two novel UBE3A intragenic deletions. Subsequently, the MLPA P336-A2 kit was used to confirm and determine the size of the UBE3A deletion in the two patients. A review of the clinical features of previously reported patients with whole UBE3A gene or partial intragenic deletions is presented here together with these two new patients.

Conclusion

Although rare, UBE3A intragenic deletions may represent a small fraction of AS patients without a genetic diagnosis. Testing for UBE3A intragenic exonic deletions should be performed in those AS patients with a normal methylation pattern and no mutations in the UBE3A gene.

Keywords

Angelman syndrome (AS) UBE3A Intragenic deletionsMLPA

Background

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurogenetic disorder characterized by a severe intellectual disability with absence of speech, distinctive dysmorphic craniofacial features such as microcephaly with flat occiput and occipital groove, wide mouth, ataxia related neurological problems and/or tremor in the limbs and seizures with specific EEG pattern abnormalities that persist into adulthood. The behavioural phenotype is characterized by happy disposition, hyperactivity, attention deficit and frequent disruption of sleep cycles. Other clinical problems are gastrointestinal difficulties with feeding problems, gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, scoliosis, and an increased sensitivity to heat. Its prevalence is about 1/15000 births [13].

The cause of AS is the loss of function in neurons of the ubiquitin protein ligase E6-AP (E6-Associated Protein) encoded by the UBE3A gene, which is located on chromosome 15q11.2-q13 region. This region includes a cluster of genes under imprinting control which show differential expression depending on the parental origin, in a tissue-specific manner. UBE3A shows a specific expression of the maternal allele in neurons while the paternal allele is silenced by the synthesis of an antisense transcript from the SNURF-SNPRN gene (UBE3A-ATS). The absence of the specific maternal expression of UBE3A is the main cause of AS [4].

The functional loss of UBE3A in the maternal allele is due to different genetic mechanisms: (i) deletion of the region 15q11.2-q13 in 70–75% of patients, (ii) mutations in the UBE3A gene in 10–15% of the patients, (iii) paternal uniparental disomy in 1–3% of patients, and (iv) genomic imprinting defects in 2–4% of the patients. The genetic cause remains unknown in approximately 10% of patients presenting clinical features characteristic of AS [4, 5]. There are also some reports that describe a proportion of AS patients who harbor microdeletions of the UBE3A gene [610].

The UBE3A gene spans 120 kb of genomic DNA and consists of 10 exons (NM_130838.1). The ubiquitin protein ligase E6-AP encoded by the UBE3A gene is necessary for the ubiquitination of proteins targeted for degradation. E6-AP belongs to the HECT (homologous to E6-AP COOH terminus) class of E3 enzymes that share a 40 kDa COOH-terminal catalytic domain. This domain is encoded by exons 3–10 [11]. Exons 1 to 5 encode a steroid co-activation region which has several LXXLL motifs that are known to be receptor interacting motifs [12].

Mutations in the UBE3A gene are widely distributed and have been detected throughout all regions of the gene [13, 14]. Rare intragenic deletions and duplications may represent a higher percentage of mutations than expected, because these alterations escape the routine screening [15].

Here, we report two patients with AS who present two novel intragenic deletions within the UBE3A gene.

Case presentation

Patient 1 is a 5 year-old girl born at 37 weeks of gestation. Birth weight was 2850 g. Neither perinatal problems nor hypotonia was reported. Initially, she didn’t show feeding problems but when solid food was introduced into her diet, she had difficulties to swallow. Psychomotor development was delayed. She sat unsupported at 9 months, walked independently at 24 months and pronounced only two words which she lost later. She came to the clinical geneticist when she was 2-year-8-month old. Phenotypic features included relative microcephaly (47 cm, −1.75 SD), small and wide-spaced teeth and protruding tongue. Her weight was 12 Kg (25th percentile) and her height was 80 cm (50th percentile). Neurological examination detected severe intellectual disability, ataxia of gait, receptive and non-verbal communication skills higher than verbal ones, hyperreflexia of the lower extremities, tremulous movement of limbs and frequent drooling. She also had abnormal sleep-wake cycles and by the age of 20 months she developed seizures. EEG showed generalized slow wave activity with paroxysmal activity. The behavioural phenotype included frequent laugher, happy demeanour, easily excitable personality, hyperactive behaviour, attention deficit and exploration of objects throughout the mouth. She also presented attraction to water and an increased sensitivity to heat (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical data of patients with UBE3A intragenic deletions, following the clinical features of AS described by Williams et al., 2006

 

Patient 1

Patient 2

Bürger, et al., 2002

Boyes, et al., 2006

Boyes, et al., 2006

Calì, et al., 2010

Beleza-Meireles, et al., 2011

Piard, et al., 2011

Piard, et al., 2011

Genetics

 Intragenic deletion

Exon 2a

Exons 9-10a

Whole UBE3A

Exons 8-16b

Exons 8-16b

Exon 8c

Exons 5-12c

Exons 6-12c

Exons 6-12c

 Predicted protein

p.0?

p.Arg765_852del88

p. 0?

p.0?

p.0?

p.Leu517Valfsa27

p.0?

p.0?

p.0?

 Inheritance

De novo

De novo

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

NA

Maternal

Maternal

Clinical data

 Sex

F

F

M

F

M

M

F

F

F

 Weight at birth

2850 g

3000 g

2670 g

3200 g

3350 g

3370 g

3880 g

NA

NA

 Perinatal problems

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Age of sedestation (months)

9

8

12

18

21

18

NA

9

NA

 Age of walk (months)

24

24

18

39

39

24

24

24

24

Consistent clinical features of AS (100% of the affected individuals)

 Ataxia of gait

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

NA

+

 Frequent laugher/smiling

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Apparent happy demeanor

+

+

NA

+

+

NA

+

+

+

 Easily excitable personality

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Hyperactive behaviour

+

+

NA

+

+

NA

+

NA

+

 Attention deficit

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Hand flapping/stereotipies

+

NA

+

NA

NA

+

+

+

 Development delay

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Severe mental retardation

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Speech impairement

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Receptive and non-verbal communication skills higher than verbal ones

+

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Frequent clinical features of AS (more than 80% of the affected individuals)

 Microcephaly

Relative

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Seizures

+

+

NA

+

+

+

+

+

 Abnormal EEG

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

NA

Associatedclinical features of AS (20–80% of the affected individuals)

 Hypotonia

+

+

+

+

+

NA

NA

 Feeding problems

NA

NA

NA

+

NA

NA

 Prognathia

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

+

NA

NA

 Flat Occiput

NA

NA

NA

NA

+

NA

NA

 Occipital groove

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Hypopigmented skin, light hair and eye color

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Strabismus

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

+

+

 Wide mouth

+

+

NA

NA

NA

+

NA

 Wide-spaced teeth

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

+

+

 Protruding tongue

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Small hands and feet

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Scoliosis

NA

NA

+

+

NA

NA

+

 Uplifted flexed arm position, especially during deambulation

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Hyperreflexia of the lower extremities

+

NA

+

NA

+

NA

NA

NA

 Tremolous movement of limbs

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Freqüent drooling

+

+

NA

NA

NA

+

NA

NA

NA

 Suck/swallowing disorders

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

+

 Abnormal sleep-wake cycle

+

NA

+

+

NA

NA

+

+

 Chewing/mouthing behaviour

+

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Atraction to/fascination with water

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Increased sensitivity to heat

+

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

F female, M male, + present, absent, NA not available

aNomenclature exons 1–10 according to NM_130838.1

bNomenclature exons according to Kishino and Wagstaff, 1998; Yamamoto, et al., 1997

cNomenclature exons 1–14 according to NM_00462.3

Methylation PCR and UBE3A sequencing were carried out in another centre with negative results. MS-MLPA analysis was performed in our laboratory using a specific kit, SALSA MS-MLPA ME028-B2 Prader Willi/Angelman, (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). This kit contains 46 probes, 32 of which are specific for sequences in or close to the PWS/AS critical region on 15q11.2-q13 which can be used to detect copy number changes in this region. As a control for copy number changes, 14 probes outside the PWS/AS region are included. Among the PWS/AS specific probes, seven probes are methylation-sensitive and contain a HhaI restriction site. Five probes are located within the UBE3A gene corresponding to exons 1, 2, 3, 4 and 9 (NM_130838.1). In this paper, we use exon numbering according to NM_130838.1 sequence which is the standard reference sequence for the UBE3A gene where exons 1 to 10 correspond to exons 5b to 14 of the NM_000462.3 sequence. MLPA was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (MRC Holland). Amplification products were run on an ABI3130 analyser (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) and analyzed using the GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems).

Methylation pattern of the 15q11.2-q13 region was normal. However, dosage analysis showed a reduction of 50% in the relative peak height of the probe corresponding to UBE3A exon 2 while probes corresponding to UBE3A exons 1, 3, 4 and 9 (NM_130838.1) showed a normal diploid dosage (Fig. 1a). To confirm the specific UBE3A exon 2 deletion the MLPA P336-A2 kit (MRC Holland) was used. This kit contains 42 MLPA probes, including at least one probe for each exon of the UBE3A gene.
Fig. 1

Two intragenic deletions within the UBE3A gene (NM_130838.1) were identified by MLPA analysis in patients 1 and 2. a MS-MLPA analysis with the ME028-B2 kit shows a normal methylation pattern and a heterozygous deletion of exon 2 in patient 1. A normal methylation pattern and a heterozygous deletion of exon 9 were observed in patient 2. Red asterisks indicate the deleted exons. b MLPA analysis with the kit P336-A2 confirmed the deletion of exon 2 in patient 1 while a deletion involving exon 9 and 10 was observed in patient 2. In both cases the deletions were de novo. Red asterisks indicate the deleted exons. c Summary of UBE3A intragenic deletions identified in this study and the literature. Exons are depicted as grey boxes. Exons 1 to 5 constitute the steriod co-activation region and exons 3 to 10 constitute the HECT ligase domain, according to Ramamoorthy and Nawaz et al., 2008. UBE3A deletions reported here and in the literature are shown as black bars

A reduction of 50% in the relative peak height corresponding to the probe located in the exon 2 was detected while all other UBE3A exonic probes presented normal dosage confirming that the deletion only involved exon 2 (Fig. 1b). Parents testing showed that deletion was de novo (Fig. 1b), although a germline mosaic cannot be excluded. In order to investigate in which parental allele the deletion was originated, we used six SNP located in intron 2: rs71418040, rs17114442, rs28754450, rs57111857, rs757438 and rs61336305. All of them were not informative so the maternal origin of the deletion could not be confirmed.

Patient 2 is a 5 year-old girl born at term following an uneventful pregnancy. Her birth weight was 3000 g. No perinatal problems were reported but she was noted to be hypotonic. She presented developmental delay. Unsupported sedestation was achieved at 8 months and independent walking at 24 months. Oral language was limited to around 10 words.

Physical features of the patient included prognathia, wide mouth and wide-spaced teeth. The neurological manifestations included severe intellectual disability, ataxia of gait, uplifted and flexed arm position during deambulation, speech impairment, frequent drooling and seizures. The EEG showed generalized slow wave activity with paroxysmal activity. She didn’t present disturbances of the sleep-wake cycle.

The behavioral traits included a happy demeanor with smiling, laughing, hyperactive behavior, attention deficit, hand flapping and chewing/mouthing behaviors. At the age of the diagnosis, 5.6-year-old, her weight was 15 Kg (10th percentile) and the head circumference was 48 cm (−1.5 SD) (Table 1).

Initially, MLPA analysis was carried out using the SALSA MLPA P064 Mental Retardation probemix-1 in the Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia. The results showed a deletion of the exon 10 (NM_130838.1) of the UBE3A gene (data not shown). Subsequently, a DNA sample of the patient was sent to our laboratory for further studies. MS-MLPA testing was performed and showed a normal methylation pattern. However, a reduction of 50% in the relative peak height of the probe corresponding to the UBE3A exon 9 was observed while probes corresponding to UBE3A exons 1, 2, 3, 4 (NM_130838.1) showed a normal diploid dosage (Fig. 1a). To confirm the UBE3A exon 9 and 10 deletion and to determine whether the deletion expanded to other exons, MLPA P336-A2 kit was used. MLPA analysis confirmed the deletion only involving exon 9 and 10 (Fig. 1b). The genetic analysis in the parents showed that the deletion encompassing exons 9 and 10 was de novo (Fig.1b). In patient 2, two SNPs in intron 9: rs573271880, rs17115485 and 1 SNP in exon 10: rs10047992 were analyzed to investigate the parental origin of the deletion. As in patient 1, we could not confirm the maternal origin of the deletion.

Discussion and conclusions

Angelman syndrome is caused by the lack of expression of the maternal copy in neurons of the UBE3A gene due to four different molecular etiologies: Deletion of the 15q11.2-q13 region on the maternal chromosome, mutations in the maternally-inherited copy of UBE3A, paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15 and an imprinting defect causing lack of expression of the maternal copy of UBE3A [16].

Genotype-phenotype correlations among molecular subclasses have shown that deletion patients show a more severe phenotype in all aspects of neurodevelopmental delay except for expressive language skills that are extremely poor regardless of their molecular subclass [1721]. However, Mertz et al., 2014 report that children with AS due to an UBE3A mutation or paternal uniparental disomy present significantly better linguistic properties than deletion patients, in particular the expressive area, where 6 out of 9 children with UBE3A mutation or paternal uniparental disomy could use 2–7 words while it was just the case in 3 out of 30 children with a 15q11.2-q13 deletion [22]. In addition, the deletion class is the most severely affected regarding microcephaly, seizures, relative hypopigmentation, motor difficulties while paternal uniparental disomy and imprinting defect individuals have better physical growth, have less movement and ataxia abnormalities, and have a lower prevalence (but not absence) of seizures [18]. In particular, individuals with deletions manifest higher rates of epilepsy (90%, compared to 75% among individuals without deletion), earlier onset of seizures (mean of age 1.9 years, compared with 6.3 years among individuals without deletion) and may exhibit a more severe electroencephalogram phenotype compared to the other etiologies [23].

It has been suggested that AS patients carrying UBE3A mutations show a phenotype somewhere in the middle between deletion and paternal uniparental disomy carriers. They present higher incidences of seizures and microcephaly, similar to deletion patients, while their neurodevelopment delay is similar to paternal uniparental disomy and imprinting defect patient carriers [18, 19]. A revision of genotype-phenotype differences has been published recently by La Salle et al. [24].

The patients presented in this report carry intragenic UBE3A exonic deletions that affect the UBE3A open reading frame. Exon 2 deletion in patient 1 is predicted to eliminate the start codon and consequently no protein will be produced (p.0?). Deletion of exons 9 and 10 in patient 2 is predicted to eliminate the last 88 aminoacids (p.Arg765_Leu852del88) disrupting the ubiquitin ligase catalytic domain located at the 3′ end of the protein (Fig. 1c).

So far, seven patients with whole UBE3A gene or partial intragenic deletions have been reported (Fig. 1c). A summary of their clinical features is presented in Table 1. All deletions reported previously are also predicted to affect the UBE3A open reading frame and create a premature stop codon at the beginning of the protein (Table 1). Only patient 2 and the patient reported by Cali et al., 2010 present exon deletions that would alter the 3′ end of the UBE3A disrupting the ubiquitin ligase activity of the protein.

All patients show the consistent clinical features of AS except for patient 1 who does not present stereotypes. This is surprising because stereotypes have been described as a clinical feature often present in all patients with AS since early in development. Microcephaly is present in almost all patients (7 of nine patients) while seizures are present in all except one (7 of eight patients available). The high incidence of seizures and microcephaly is in accordance to what has been reported before by Lossie et al., 2001 and Moncla et al., 1999. Associated clinical features show variability between patients. A comparison of AS patients with mutations and intragenic deletions has not been reported before and from our observations there are no differences between the two groups.

In our laboratory, array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) is the first diagnostic tool in neurodevelopmental disorders. Methylation Specific-Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) of the 15q11.2-q13 region is carried out when there is a strong clinical suspicion of Angelman or Prader Willi syndrome. MS-MLPA analysis simultaneously assesses the methylation status and genomic dosage changes at the 15q11.2-q13 region and can confirm the diagnosis and identify the presence of a causative deletion in 70% of cases. In the case of a normal methylation pattern and if the clinical suspicion remains high, sequence analysis of the UBE3A gene is performed, as 10% of Angelman patients harbor UBE3A mutations.

In addition, we propose here that the analysis of the copy number variations within the UBE3A gene should be taken into account, once the MS-MLPA test and the sequencing of UBE3A have been carried out with a negative result. Although rare, intragenic deletions may account for a small proportion of AS patients without a genetic diagnosis and if present, they have a recurrence risk of up to 50%, depending on the carrier status of the mother. In the two patients reported here the mutation has appeared de novo but in the other intragenic deletions previously reported they were transmitted by healthy mothers to their affected children (Table 1). Moreover, MLPA analysis of the UBE3A gene can be used to confirm and precisely establish the size of an intragenic deletion detected by MS-MLPA. The SALSA MLPA kit P336-A2 UBE3A contains probes for all coding exons of the UBE3A gene (exons 1–10, NM_130838.1).

To date, few reports have evaluated the contribution of exonic deletions to the spectrum of UBE3A mutations. Here, we report two patients with AS who present two novel intragenic deletions within the UBE3A gene that together with those reported in the literature show that UBE3A intragenic deletions may represent a small fraction of AS patients. Testing for UBE3A intragenic exonic deletions/duplications should be included in those AS patients with a normal methylation pattern and no mutations in the UBE3A gene.

Abbreviations

AS: 

Angelman syndrome

E6-AP: 

E6- Associated Protein

HECT: 

Homologous to E6-AP COOH terminus

MLPA: 

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification

MS-MLPA: 

Methylation Specific Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the patients and their families for their collaboration.

Funding

The financial support for carrying out this work was received from Fundació Parc Taulí- Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT (CIR2015/040), Asociación Española de Síndrome de Angelman and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI16/01411).

Availability of data and materials

Additional data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Design of the work: MG, CA, AR, NB, MV. Data collection: CA, MV, NB, EG, CF, NC, SC, AS, MM, DR. Data analysis and interpretation: CA, MV, NB, AR, MG. Manuscript preparation: CA, AR. Manuscript revising, all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent for this investigation was obtained from all participating patients and parents, and the project was carried out in agreement with the Ethical Committee of the Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish from the parents to report patient data has been obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Genetics Laboratory, UDIAT-Centre Diagnòstic, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
(2)
Paediatric Unit, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
(3)
Laboratory for Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia “Dr Vukan Cupic”, Belgrade, Serbia
(4)
Department of Metabolism and Clinical Genetics, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia “Dr Vukan Cupic“, Belgrade, Serbia
(5)
School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

References

  1. Williams CA, Zori RT, Hendrickson J, Stalker H, Marum T, Whidden E, Driscoll DJ. Angelman Syndrome. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1995;25(7):216–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Williams CA, Angelman H, Clayton-Smith J, Driscoll DJ, Hendrickson JE, Knoll JHM, Magenis RE, Schinzel A, Wagstaff J, Midden EM, et al. Angelman Syndrome. Consensus for diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet. 1995;56(2):237–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Williams CA, Beaudet AL, Clayton-Smith J, Knoll JH, Kyllerman M, Laan LA, Magenis RE, Moncla A, Schinzel AA, Summers JA, et al. Angelman syndrome 2005: updated consensus for diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140A(5):413–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Buiting K. Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome. Am J Med Genet C: Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C(3):365–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ramsden SC, Clayton-Smith J, Birch R, Buiting K. Practice guidelines for the molecular analysis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. BMC Medical Genetics. 2010;11(1)Google Scholar
  6. Beleza-Meireles A, Cerqueira R, Sousa SB, Palmeiro A, Ramos L. Novel deletion encompassing exons 5–12 of the UBE3A gene in a girl with Angelman syndrome. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 2011;54(3):348–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyes L, Wallace AJ, Krajewska-Walasek M, Chrzanowska KH, Clayton-Smith J, Ramsden S. Detection of a deletion of exons 8–16 of the UBE3A gene in familial Angelman syndrome using a semi-quantitative dosage PCR based assay. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 2006;49(6):472–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Calì F, Ragalmuto A, Chiavetta V, Calabrese G, Fichera M, Vinci M, Ruggeri G, Schinocca P, Sturnio M, Romano S, et al. Novel deletion of the E3A ubiquitin protein ligase gene detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in a patient with Angelman syndrome. Experimental and Mol Med. 2010;42(12):842.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Piard J, Depienne C, Keren B, Fédirko E, Trouillard O, Charles P, Heron D. Intragenic deletion of UBE3A gene in 2 sisters with Angelman syndrome detected by MLPA. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155(12):3170–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bürger J, Horn D, Tönnies H, Neitzel H, Reis A. Familial interstitial 570 kbp deletion of theUBE3Agene region causing Angelman syndrome but not Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111(3):233–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagli A, Buiting K, Williams CA. Molecular and clinical aspects of Angelman syndrome. Molecular Syndromology. 2011;Google Scholar
  12. Ramamoorthy S, Nawaz Z. E6-associated protein (E6-AP) is a dual function coactivator of steroid hormone receptors. Nucl Recept Signal. 2008;6:e006.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bird L. Angelman syndrome: review of clinical and molecular aspects. Appl Clin Genet. 2014;7:93–104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Sadikovic B, Fernandes P, Zhang VW, Ward PA, Miloslavskaya I, Rhead W, Rosenbaum R, Gin R, Roa B, Fang P. Mutation update for UBE3A variants in Angelman syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(12):1407–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tzagkaraki E, Sofocleous C, Helen F-K, Dinopoulos A, Goulielmos G, Mavrou A, Sofia K-T, Kanavakis E. Screening of UBE3A gene in patients referred for Angelman syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17(4):366–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams CA, Driscoll DJ, Dagli AI. Clinical and genetic aspects of Angelman syndrome. Genetics in Medicine. 2010;12(7):385–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentile JK, Tan W-H, Horowitz LT, Bacino CA, Skinner SA, Barbieri-Welge R, Bauer-Carlin A, Beaudet AL, Bichell TJ, Lee H-S, et al. A neurodevelopmental survey of Angelman syndrome with genotype-phenotype correlations. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2010;31(7):592–601.Google Scholar
  18. Lossie A, Whitney M, Ammidon D, Dong H, Chen P. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of AS. J Med Genet. 2001;38:834–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Moncla A, Malzac P, Voelckel M-A, Auquier P, Girardot L, Mattei M-G, Philip N, Mattei J-F, Lalande M, Livet M-O. Phenotype–genotype correlation in 20 deletion and 20 non-deletion Angelman syndrome patients. Eur J Hum Genet. 1999;7:131–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Varela MC, Kok F, Otto PA, Koiffmann CP. Phenotypic variability in Angelman syndrome: comparison among different deletion classes and between deletion and UPD subjects. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12(12):987–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sahoo T, Bacino CA, German JR, Shaw CA, Bird LM, Kimonis V, Anselm I, Waisbren S, Beaudet AL, Peters SU. Identification of novel deletions of 15q11q13 in Angelman syndrome by array-CGH: molecular characterization and genotype–phenotype correlations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15(9):943–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mertz LGB, Thaulov P, Trillingsgaard A, Christensen R, Vogel I, Hertz JM, Østergaard JR. Neurodevelopmental outcome in Angelman syndrome: genotype–phenotype correlations. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(7):1742–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thibert RL, Larson AM, Hsieh DT, Raby AR, Thiele EA. Neurologic manifestations of Angelman syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48(4):271–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. LaSalle JM, Reiter LT, Chamberlain SJ. Epigenetic regulation of UBE3A and roles in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Epigenomics. 2015;7(7):1213–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement