Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Genetics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Whole exome sequencing identifies TRIOBP pathogenic variants as a cause of post-lingual bilateral moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:142

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-017-0499-z

Received: 5 February 2017

Accepted: 14 November 2017

Published: 2 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Implementation of whole exome sequencing has provided unique opportunity for a wide screening of causative variants in genetically heterogeneous diseases, including nonsyndromic hearing impairment. TRIOBP in the inner ear is responsible for proper structure and function of stereocilia and is necessary for sound transduction.

Methods

Whole exome sequencing followed by Sanger sequencing was conducted on patients derived from Polish hearing loss family.

Results

Based on whole exome analysis, we identified two TRIOBP pathogenic variants (c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672*, the first of which was novel) causative of nonsyndromic, peri- to postlingual, moderate-to-severe hearing loss in three siblings from a Polish family. Typically, TRIOBP pathogenic variants lead to prelingual, severe-to-profound hearing loss, thus the onset and degree of hearing impairment in our patients represent a distinct phenotypic manifestation caused by TRIOBP variants. The pathogenic variant p.Gln268Leufs*610 disrupts the TRIOBP-4 and TRIOBP-5 isoforms (both expressed exclusively in the inner ear and retina) whereas the second pathogenic variant c.514G>T, p.Gly1672* affects only TRIOBP-5.

Conclusions

The onset and degree of hearing impairment, characteristic for our patients, represent a unique phenotypic manifestation caused by TRIOBP pathogenic variants. Although TRIOBP alterations are not a frequent cause of hearing impairment, this gene should be thoroughly analyzed especially in patients with a postlingual hearing loss. A delayed onset of hearing impairment due to TRIOBP pathogenic variants creates a potential therapeutic window for future targeted therapies.

Keywords

Whole exome sequencingHearing impairment TRIOBP

Background

Two-thirds of early onset hearing impairment (HI) cases are due to genetic causes [1]. After excluding the GJB2 and GJB6 pathogenic variants more than 90 genes may be involved in HI pathogenesis (http://hereditaryhearingloss.org). Massive screening for causative variants within all protein-coding sequences is now available through whole exome sequencing (WES). Thus, a wide and unbiased search for pathogenic variants has become possible in many genetically heterogeneous diseases including HI [2].

TRIOBP (Trio- and f-actin-binding protein) (MIM 609761) was cloned in 2001 as TARA [3] and renamed after its mapping to chromosome 22q13.1 [4]. Multiple isoforms of the protein, differing in total length and expression pattern, have been discovered [5, 6]. Both, human and mouse isoforms are classified into long (TRIOBP-3, TRIOBP-5, TRIOBP-6) and short (TRIOBP-1, TRIOBP-2, TRIOBP-4). Interestingly, no part of the protein is shared between TRIOBP-1 and TRIOBP-4 [3]. Such a variety of isoforms derived from a single gene may be explained by the presence of six putative alternative promoters [7].

While TRIOBP-1 is widely expressed in different tissues, TRIOBP-4 and TRIOBP-5 was exclusively found in the adult inner ear and retina of both human and mice. In the inner ear TRIOBP-4 and TRIOBP-5 are expressed in stereocilia rootlets. Additionally, TRIOBP-4 is also localized along the whole length of stereocilia. Proper structure of the rootlets is essential for stereocilia rigidity and stiffness, thereby allowing normal process of sound transmission [8]. In contrast, TRIOBP-1 plays a role in regulation of adherens junctions as well as reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, especially in stress fibers and cortical F-actin [6].

We present here a family with isolated, perilingual to postlingual hearing loss with a recessive inheritance pattern, in which WES followed by direct Sanger sequencing allowed to identify one novel (c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610) and one known (c.5014G>T, Gly1672* [9]) TRIOBP pathogenic variant and establish a molecular diagnosis.

Methods

Pedigree of the analyzed family is presented in Fig. 1a. The level of hearing loss was determined based on pure tone audiometry (PTA) and classified as perilingual if its onset was between 3 to 6 y or postlingual with an onset after 6 y.
Fig. 1

Structure and variants of TRIOBP in the studied family with HI. a. Pedigree of the analyzed family. Circles and squares represent females and males, respectively. Black arrow denotes the proband, genotypes of the TRIOBP gene are given below the respective symbols. b. Mean audiograms for both ears in all affected siblings (III.1, III.2, III.3) (Y axis presents HI level in dB, X axis presents the tested frequency in kilohertz). c. TRIOBP pathogenic variants identified in this study - Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) views for c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 (left panel) and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* (right panel). d. Schematic localization of the c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* variants within the TRIOBP gene. Upper panels show the TRIOBP gene structure, whereas the lower panels present three isoforms, TRIOBP-5, TRIOBP-4 and TRIOBP-1, respectively. All of them are in the same reading frame. TRIOBP-4 translation starts from an alternative start site in exon 6, whereas TRIOBP-1 translation start is localized within an alternative exon 11a. Numbers given below the particular isoforms denote first and last amino acid

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood by a standard salting out method [10]. In the affected siblings GJB2 pathogenic variants and GJB6 deletions were excluded [11]. Library for WES was prepared with TruSeq Exome Enrichment Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), subsequently the sample was run on HiSeq 1500 (Illumina Inc.) with 2 × 100 bp paired-end reads. After obtaining the coverage of minimum 20 times on at least 80% of the target, bioinformatics analysis was performed as previously described [12]. All retrieved variants were annotated with Annovar and presented in MS Access database for further expert investigations. The DNA sequences were viewed with Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV) [13, 14].

Potentially pathogenic variants in TRIOBP were confirmed by Sanger sequencing with the use of dedicated primers (sequences available upon request) designed with the Primer 3 software [15] based on the NM_001039141.2 reference sequence.

The prediction of presence of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) mechanism was performed with the Mutation Taster algorithm [16].

Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) (http://exac.broadinstitute.org) (accessed 12/2016) and the in-house database of WES data from the Polish population (n = 1052) were used for the assessment of the population prevalence of the detected variants.

Results

Phenotypic manifestation

Proband (III.2), as well as the two affected siblings suffered from bilateral, non-syndromic HI. Apart from HI, all of the siblings were otherwise healthy. The age of HI onset was 12 y for the proband and 4,5 y and 3 y for the sibling III.1 and III.3, respectively. The proband was reported for an audiology consultation due to suspected hearing loss based on the parents’ observation that she listened to electronic devices on a loud volume. The reason for the audiology tests in the siblings was similar, but it cannot be excluded that the parents were more attentive in observing their younger son. All siblings suffered from moderate-to-severe HI, detailed audiometric data are presented in Fig. 1b. The 2-year follow-up does not show hearing deterioration in sibling III.1 and III.2, for the patient III.3 the additional audiometric data were not available. Notably, the youngest brother (III.3) passed the newborn hearing screening test, the remaining sibs did not have this test. Patient III.3 suffers from frequent otitis media and he has a relevant air-bone gap in the right ear (~40 dB). Now his HI is classified as mixed comprising of a conductive and sensorineural component.

Variants detection

WES performed in patient III.2 revealed the presence of two, potentially pathogenic variants in the TRIOBP gene (NM_001039141.2:c.802_805delCAGG, NP_001034230.1: p.Gln268Leufs*610; NM_001039141.2:c.5014G>T, NP_001034230.1:p.Gly1672*) both in a heterozygous form (Fig. 1c). The variant c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 was novel, whereas c.5014G>T, NP_001034230.1:p.Gly1672* was already known [9]. Direct Sanger sequencing of the region encompassing the detected variants confirmed the presence of both variants in the proband and her affected siblings. Analysis of parents’ DNA showed that they were both heterozygous carriers, thus establishing an in trans configuration of the variants in the affected children (Fig. 1a). The c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 mutation occurs with an allele frequency of 0,000008 and 0,00095 in ExAC and the Polish in-house WES databases, respectively. Allele frequency for c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672*, the second identified TRIOBP variant, was 0,0006 and 0,002 in the same databases (Table 1).
Table 1

Mutations in the TRIOBP gene (NM_001039141.2, NP_001034230.1) according to The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD), their frequency in ExAC and Polish in-house WES database and available clinical data

variant

phenotype

ExAC allele count

ExAC allele frequency

Pol_Exome allele count

Pol_Exome allele frequency

reference

age of onset

HI level

ethnicity

pathogenicity of variantd

c.154G>A (p.Asp52Asn)

deafness

23/117210

0,0001962

0

0

[ 17 ]

late onseta

nd

Japanese

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.802_805delCAGG (p.Gln268fs)

postlingual hearing loss

1/120722

0,000008283

2

0,0019

this study

postlingual

moderate-to-severe

Polish

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.889C>T (p.Gln297*a)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Indian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.1039C>T (p.Arg347*a)

deafness non-syndromic

5/120762

0,0000414

0

0

[ 6 ]

prelingual

profound

Palestinian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.1741C>T (p.Gln581*a)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 6 ]

prelingual

profound

Palestinian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2355_2356delAG (p.Arg785fs)

Hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

0c

0c

0

0

[ 2 ]

nd

nd

Turkish

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2362C>T (p.Arg788*a)

deafness non-syndromic

4/120766

0,00003312

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Pakistani

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2581C>T (p.Arg861*a)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

1/120758

0,000008281

0

0

[ 31 ]

congenital

profound

Chinese

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2653del (p.Arg885fs)

hearing loss

0c

0c

0

0

[ 9 ]

prelingual

moderate

Dutch

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2758C>T (p.Arg920*a)

Hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

0c

0c

0

0

[ 31 ]

congenital

profound

Chinese

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.2992G>A (p.Ala998Thr)

hearing loss

85/120672

0,0007044

0

0

[ 18 ]

congenital

mild to moderate

unknown

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.3055G>A (p.Gly1019Arg)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 6 ]

prelingual

profound

Palestinian

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.3202_3203delCG (p.Asp1069fs)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Indian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.3202C>T (p.Arg1068*a)

deafness non-syndromic

1/120342

0,00000831

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Pakistani

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.3232dupC (p.Arg1078fs)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Indian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.3232C>T (p.Arg1078Cys)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

355/120198

0,002953

0

0

[ 32 ]

prelingual

nd

Western-European

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.3349C>T (p.Arg1117*a)

deafness non-syndromic

0c

0c

0

0

[ 5 ]

prelingual

severe-to-profound

Indian

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.3451A>G (p.Met1151Val)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

14/120634

0,0001161

0

0

[ 31 ]

nd

severe to profound HL of the left ear, and mild to moderate HL of the right ear

Chinese

uncertain significancef

c.3460_3461del (p.Leu1154fs)

hearing loss

5/120614

0,00004145

0

0

[ 9 ]

prelingual

mild

Dutch

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.3662G>A (p.Arg1221Gln)

hearing loss

38/116270

0,0003268

0

0

[ 18 ]

congenital

severe to profound

unknown

uncertain significancee

c.3942G > C (p.Glu1314Asp)

hearing loss

3/7416

0,0004045

0

0

[ 18 ]

congenital

severe to profound

unknown

uncertain significancee

c.4187C>T (p.Pro1396Arg)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

1/69904

0,00001431

0

0

[ 31 ]

nd

severe to profound HL of the left ear, and mild to moderate HL of the right ear

Chinese

uncertain significancef

c.4691G>C (p.Gly1564Ala)

hearing loss

0c

0c

0

0

[ 18 ]

nd

Nd

unknown

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.4840G>T (p.Gly1614Cys)

deafness

18/118002

0,0001525

0

0

[ 17 ]

early onsetb

Nd

Japanese

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c. 5014G>T (p.Gly1672*a)

postlingual hearing loss

59/103272

0,0005713

4

0,0038

this study/ [9]

postlingual/prelingual

moderate-to-severe/moderate

Polish/Dutch

pathogenic (PVS1)

c.5519G>A (p.Arg1840His)

deafness

3/113104

0,00002652

0

0

[ 17 ]

early onsetb

nd

Japanese

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.5767G>A (p.Ala1923Thr)

hearing loss

47/31044

0,001514

0

0

[ 18 ]

congenital

mild to moderate

unknown

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.6362C>T (p.Ser2121Leu)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

56/19236

0,002911

0

0

[ 25 ]

prelingual

nd

Iranian

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.6736G>A (p.Glu2246Lys)

hearing loss

556/90848

0,00612

0

0

[ 18 ]

congenital

severe to profound

unknown

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.6860G>A (p.Arg2287His)

deafness

0c

0c

0

0

[ 17 ]

early onsetb

nd

Japanese

likely pathogenic (PM2)

c.7000C>T (p.Arg2334Trp)

hearing loss non-syndromic autosomal recessive

2/120504

0,0000166

0

0

[ 32 ]

prelingual

nd

Western-European

likely pathogenic (PM2)

Novel mutation is written in bold

nd no data

a above 6 y.o

b below 6 y.o

cnot reported in ExAC database

daccording to criteria for classifying pathogenic variants described by Richards et al. [26]; PVS1 - very strong evidence of pathogenicity (null varaints in a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism of disease); PM2 moderate evidence of pathogenicity (absent from controls or at low frequency in ExAC)

efound in cis with second TRIOBP variant

f in silico predictions are contradictory

The c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 variant (localized within exon 7) introduces a 4-nucleotide deletion, which results in a frameshift, leading to shortening of the protein after the following 610 amino acids, while the c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* variant (localized within exon 9) directly introduces a stop codon. Presence of two deleterious TRIOBP variants in a trans configuration in all affected children strongly suggest that they represent a molecular cause of HI in these patients.

Discussion

Here we report on the first TRIOBP family suffering from perilingual or postlingual, moderate-to-severe HI. At the time of writing the onset and degree of HI, characteristic for our patients, represent a unique phenotypic manifestation caused by TRIOBP pathogenic variants. Most of the heretofore detected TRIOBP pathogenic variants are related to prelingual, severe-to-profound hearing loss. There is only one variant (c.154G>A, p.Asp52Asn) assigned to postlingual onset of HI [17] but in this patient the level of HI has not been given. On the other hand, there are few reports on a less severe HI in patients with TRIOBP variants but with a prelingual onset [18] (Table 1). Thus, our TRIOBP family is the first one with a less severe HI in respect to both its onset and level.

To date, little is known about the exact function of TRIOBP. It contains two types of relevant domains, i.e. N-terminal Pleckstrin Homology (PH) and C-terminal coiled-coil. It is established that this protein directly binds and stabilizes the F-actin structures [3], presumably via nonconventional actin-binding sites localized in the coiled-coil domains or PH domains [19, 20]. As its name suggests, Triobp interacts with Trio, a protein derived from a group of Dbl-homology guanine nucleotide exchange factors (DH-GEFs) [3]. DH-GEFs family of proteins controls reorganization of actin cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, and also serves as transcription factors due to activation of Rho GTPases [21]. Multiple roles of TRIOBP, such as its involvement in organization of actin-cytoskeleton [3], proper centrosomal localization and segregation of chromosomes during cell division [22], cell cycle regulation in conjunction with HECTD3 protein [23] or regulation of cancer cells motility [24] raise the issue why pathogenic variants in this gene do not lead to other pathologies than isolated hearing loss. In the family presented here, both detected variants affects TRIOBP-5, whereas c.802_805deCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 affects also TRIOBP-4, without impairing the most widely expressed TRIOBP-1 (Fig. 1d), which may explain the selectivity of symptoms. On the other hand, recently some likely pathogenic variants affecting also TRIOBP-1 were described (e.g. homozygous c.6362C>T, p.Ser2121Leu [25]), leading to bilateral, prelingual HI with no other symptoms, thus the comprehensive explanation of this phenotypic phenomena needs further study.

Both variants detected in this study are predicted to result in a premature termination of translation (after amino acid 878 and 1672, respectively). Shortened TRIOPB protein due to c.802_805deCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* variants is devoid of PH and coiled-coil domains crucial for the actin-binding process. There is also a possibility that the impaired TRIOBP transcripts are directed to degradation via the NMD mechanism, which was suggested by the Mutation Taster algorithm [16]. The conclusive verification of this prediction needs further study; however, due to a restricted expression of TRIOBP-5 and TRIOBP-4 only to the inner ear and the retina we could not test the processing of TRIOBP transcripts in our patients. According to the Criteria for Classifying Pathogenic Variants described by Richards et al. [26], both variants have been classified into a group of very strong evidence of pathogenicity (PVS1) based on their type (nonsense and frameshift), localization within a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism of HI, and low allelic frequency in the ExAC and Polish in-house databases. Additionally, a paper recently published by Wesdorp et al. [9] confirms the pathogenicity of the c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* variant. Taking into account all the above and the fact that both variants were found in all three affected siblings, we consider c.802_805deCAGG, p.Gln268Leufs*610 and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* as causative for HI.

A putative consequence of the described variants is a faulty or absent (via NMD) TRIOBP protein, presumably incapable to form stereocilia rootlets. In response to sound stimulation stereocilia dispossessed of their rootlets, deflect two-four times more intensely than the proper ones and are vulnerable to damage due to their floppiness [27]. These features are consistent with the phenotype observed in the studied family – perilingual or postlingual, moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Furthermore, the localization of the c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672* affecting only the TRIOBP-5 isoform let us assume that the remaining dose of the TRIOBP-4 protein may allow an impaired functioning of the stereocilia, thus leading to a less severe phenotype than those when both isoforms are affected. This is in line with the results of Kitajiri et al. showing that TRIOBP-4 alone is sufficient to form condensed bundles from filamentous-actin parallel to stereocilia rootlets [8]. Similar, milder phenotype (moderate HI) was reported by Wesdorp et al. [9] in a family harboring pathogenic variants: c.2653del, p.Arg885fs*120 and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672*, although in this case the HI was congenital. It is worth noting that one of the here described siblings passed the newborn screening test (unfortunately the other affected siblings were not tested), which strongly supports that the trigger mechanism damaging hair cells occurs after birth. Considering the role of stereocilia rootlets in adaptation to mechanical stress due to acoustic trauma [27] it is possible that patients harboring truncating variants in the TRIOBP gene are more prone to acoustic trauma. Thus, it seems essential for TRIOBP patients to rigorously avoid noise. On the other hand, a confirmed postnatal origin of HI provides a therapeutic window for targeted treatment in the future.

TRIOBP variants are not a frequent cause of HI. To date, 31 point alterations were described (Table 1) in the TRIOBP gene, with HI being the only phenotypic manifestation. Most of heretofore described pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants are located within exon 7, thus this region should be considered as hotspot. Accumulation of repetitive sequences within this area of TRIOBP, may render it more prone to mutation than others [28]. Taking into account the frequency of mutated TRIOBP alleles in the ExAC database, c.5014G > T, p.Gly1672* is the fourth most common pathogenic variant in this gene, additionally this variant is the most prevalent in the Polish population (Table 1). The data highlights the population distinctiveness and necessity of a preliminary population analysis before introducing a diagnostic test. Thus, in a small diagnostic gene panel for HI at least the regions encompassing common TRIOBP variants (c.6736G>A, p.Glu2246Lys; c.3232dupC, p.Arg1078Cys; c.2992G>A, p.Ala998Thr and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672*) should be included. Considering their low frequency in ExAC and our Polish in-house WES databases, point variants in the TRIOBP gene seem to be a rare but important cause of non-syndromic hearing loss. Given the high heterogeneity of the HI [29], among patients with unknown cause of this disorder, after exclusion of the GJB2 and GJB6 pathogenic variants, wide screening for causative mutations using next generation sequencing is becoming a standard with at least 18 targeted diagnostic HI panels described to date [30].

Conclusions

Here we report one novel and one known TRIOBP pathogenic variant (c.802_805delCAGG, p.Gln268fs and c.5014G>T, p.Gly1672*) causative of a unique phenotype. The presented variants disrupt isoform: TRIOBP-4, TRIOBP-5 and TRIOBP-5 respectively, which are expressed in the inner ear and form stereocilia rootlets. Although TRIOBP variants are not a frequent cause of hearing loss, this gene should be thoroughly analyzed also in patients with postlingual HI.

Abbreviations

DH-GEFs: 

Dbl-homology guanine nucleotide exchange factors

ExAC: 

Exome Aggregation Consortium

HGMD: 

The Human Gene Mutation Database

HI: 

Hearing impairment

PH: 

N-terminal Pleckstrin Homology

PTA: 

Pure tone audiometry

TRIOBP: 

Trio- and f-actin-binding protein

WES: 

Whole exome sequencing

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by NCN grant no. 2011/03/D/NZ5/05592.

Availability of data and materials

All data apart from the complete results of WES are within the manuscript. The data from next-generation sequencing (WES) in the context of Polish law can be used for personal identification. Due to this we do not have permission to deposit such data in public databases, but data can be made available upon request to the corresponding authors.

Authors’ contributions

AP carried out the molecular genetic studies and wrote the original draft. UL, VAMP, JK carried out the molecular genetic studies. VAMP, JK, MO, HS performed the literature searching and estimation of the variants pathogenicity. PS participated in the sequence alignment and performed computational analysis. AP, UL, HS, MO participated in phenotyping and clinical data collection. MO, RP wrote, review and edited final version of the manuscript. RP managed the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by Ethical Committee of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing (reference number IFPS:/KB/03/2012). Patients or guardians provided informed written consent prior to participation.

Consent for publication

The patients or their guardians gave written consent for the publication of their medical information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing
(2)
Department of Medical Genetics, Warsaw Medical University
(3)
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Warsaw Medical University
(4)
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Surgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing

References

  1. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening--a silent revolution. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(20):2151–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Diaz-Horta O, Duman D, Foster J 2nd, Sirmaci A, Gonzalez M, Mahdieh N, Fotouhi N, Bonyadi M, Cengiz FB, Menendez I, et al. Whole-exome sequencing efficiently detects rare mutations in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50628.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Seipel K, O'Brien SP, Iannotti E, Medley QG, Streuli M. Tara, a novel F-actin binding protein, associates with the trio guanine nucleotide exchange factor and regulates actin cytoskeletal organization. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(Pt 2):389–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirosawa M, Nagase T, Murahashi Y, Kikuno R, Ohara O. Identification of novel transcribed sequences on human chromosome 22 by expressed sequence tag mapping. DNA research: an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes. 2001;8(1):1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Riazuddin S, Khan SN, Ahmed ZM, Ghosh M, Caution K, Nazli S, Kabra M, Zafar AU, Chen K, Naz S, et al. Mutations in TRIOBP, which encodes a putative cytoskeletal-organizing protein, are associated with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(1):137–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shahin H, Walsh T, Sobe T, Abu Sa’ed J, Abu Rayan a, lynch ED, lee MK, Avraham KB, king MC, Kanaan M. mutations in a novel isoform of TRIOBP that encodes a filamentous-actin binding protein are responsible for DFNB28 recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(1):144–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J: AceView: a comprehensive cDNA-supported gene and transcripts annotation. Genome biology 2006, 7 Suppl 1:S12 11–14.Google Scholar
  8. Kitajiri S, Sakamoto T, Belyantseva IA, Goodyear RJ, Stepanyan R, Fujiwara I, Bird JE, Riazuddin S, Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, et al. Actin-bundling protein TRIOBP forms resilient rootlets of hair cell stereocilia essential for hearing. Cell. 2010;141(5):786–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Wesdorp M, van de Kamp JM, Hensen EF, Schraders M, Oostrik J, Yntema HG, Feenstra I, Admiraal RJC, Kunst HPM, Tekin M, et al. Broadening the phenotype of DFNB28: mutations in TRIOBP are associated with moderate, stable hereditary hearing impairment. Hear Res. 2017;347:56–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(3):1215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoefsloot LH, Roux AF, Bitner-Glindzicz M. Contributors to EDbpm: EMQN best practice guidelines for diagnostic testing of mutations causing non-syndromic hearing impairment at the DFNB1 locus. European journal of human genetics: EJHG. 2013;21(11):1325–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ploski R, Pollak A, Muller S, Franaszczyk M, Michalak E, Kosinska J, Stawinski P, Spiewak M, Seggewiss H, Bilinska ZT. Does p.Q247X in TRIM63 cause human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Circ Res. 2014;114(2):e2–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(1):24–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods. 2014;11(4):361–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyagawa M, Naito T, Nishio SY, Kamatani N, Usami S. Targeted exon sequencing successfully discovers rare causative genes and clarifies the molecular epidemiology of Japanese deafness patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71381.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sloan-Heggen CM, Bierer AO, Shearer AE, Kolbe DL, Nishimura CJ, Frees KL, Ephraim SS, Shibata SB, Booth KT, Campbell CA, et al. Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2016;135(4):441–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Sobue K, Sellers JR. Caldesmon, a novel regulatory protein in smooth muscle and nonmuscle actomyosin systems. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(19):12115–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yao L, Janmey P, Frigeri LG, Han W, Fujita J, Kawakami Y, Apgar JR, Kawakami T. Pleckstrin homology domains interact with filamentous actin. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(28):19752–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rossman KL, Der CJ, Sondek J. GEF means go: turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(2):167–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhu Y, Wang C, Lan J, Yu J, Jin C, Huang H. Phosphorylation of Tara by Plk1 is essential for faithful chromosome segregation in mitosis. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318(18):2344–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu J, Lan J, Zhu Y, Li X, Lai X, Xue Y, Jin C, Huang H. The E3 ubiquitin ligase HECTD3 regulates ubiquitination and degradation of Tara. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367(4):805–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bao J, Wang S, Gunther LK, Kitajiri S, Li C, Sakamoto T. The actin-bundling protein TRIOBP-4 and -5 promotes the motility of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer letters. 2015;356(2 Pt B):367–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fardaei M, Sarrafzadeh S, Ghafouri-Fard S, Miryounesi M. Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss: a case report with a mutation in TRIOBP gene. International journal of molecular and cellular medicine. 2015;4(4):245–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Boutet de Monvel J, Petit C. Wrapping up stereocilia rootlets. Cell. 2010;141(5):748–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Viguera E, Canceill D, Ehrlich SD. Replication slippage involves DNA polymerase pausing and dissociation. EMBO J. 2001;20(10):2587–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lenz DR, Avraham KB. Hereditary hearing loss: from human mutation to mechanism. Hear Res. 2011;281(1–2):3–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ołdak M. Chapter 8 - next generation sequencing in vision and hearing impairment. In: Clinical applications for next-generation sequencing. Boston: Academic Press; 2016. p. 153–70.Google Scholar
  31. Gu X, Guo L, Ji H, Sun S, Chai R, Wang L, Li H. Genetic testing for sporadic hearing loss using targeted massively parallel sequencing identifies 10 novel mutations. Clin Genet. 2015;87(6):588–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sommen M, Schrauwen I, Vandeweyer G, Boeckx N, Corneveaux JJ, van den Ende J, Boudewyns A, De Leenheer E, Janssens S, Claes K, et al. DNA diagnostics of hereditary hearing loss: a targeted resequencing approach combined with a mutation classification system. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(8):812–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement