Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Novel homozygous missense mutation in GAN associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 in a large consanguineous family from Israel

  • Sharon Aharoni1,
  • Katy E. S. Barwick2,
  • Rachel Straussberg1,
  • Gaurav V. Harlalka2,
  • Yoram Nevo1,
  • Barry A. Chioza2,
  • Meriel M. McEntagart3,
  • Aviva Mimouni-Bloch5,
  • Michael Weedon4 and
  • Andrew H. Crosby2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:82

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-016-0343-x

Received: 10 June 2016

Accepted: 7 November 2016

Published: 16 November 2016

Abstract

Background

CMT-2 is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of peripheral axonal neuropathies characterized by slowly progressive weakness and atrophy of distal limb muscles resulting from length-dependent motor and sensory neurodegeneration. Classical giant axonal neuropathy (GAN) is an autosomal recessively inherited progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the peripheral and central nervous systems, typically diagnosed in early childhood and resulting in death by the end of the third decade. Distinctive phenotypic features are the presence of “kinky” hair and long eyelashes. The genetic basis of the disease has been well established, with over 40 associated mutations identified in the gene GAN, encoding the BTB-KELCH protein gigaxonin, involved in intermediate filament regulation.

Methods

An Illumina Human CytoSNP-12 array followed by whole exome sequence analysis was used to identify the disease associated gene mutation in a large consanguineous family diagnosed with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT-2) from which all but one affected member had straight hair.

Results

Here we report the identification of a novel GAN missense mutation underlying the CMT-2 phenotype observed in this family. Although milder forms of GAN, with and without the presence of kinky hair have been reported previously, a phenotype distinct from that was investigated in this study. All family members lacked common features of GAN, including ataxia, nystagmus, intellectual disability, seizures, and central nervous system involvement.

Conclusions

Our findings broaden the spectrum of phenotypes associated with GAN mutations and emphasize a need to proceed with caution when providing families with diagnostic or prognostic information based on either clinical or genetic findings alone.

Keywords

GANCharcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2Giant axonal neuropathy

Background

The classical form of giant axonal neuropathy [GAN, MIM #256850], is an autosomal recessive progressive neurodegenerative condition of the peripheral and central nervous systems [1]. A distinctive feature of the phenotype is the presence of “kinky” hair (tightly curled lacklustre hair distinctive from that of the parents) and long eyelashes. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is variable and includes optic atrophy, nystagmus, intellectual disability and spasticity [1]. GAN is an axonal neuropathy that is typically of infantile onset and diagnosed in early childhood [2, 3] with most affected children becoming wheelchair dependent by the second decade [3, 4]. The classical form results in death in the third decade. Sural nerve biopsies taken from GAN patients, exhibit reduced density of nerve fibres and the presence of disproportionally large axons resulting from accumulation of neurofilaments [5, 6]. The causative gene was identified in 2000 [7] and over 40 different GAN mutations have been discovered in GAN patients with some variability in phenotype [8, 9]. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT; also known as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of peripheral neuropathies characterized by a length-dependent degeneration of motor and sensory neurons, which results in slowly progressive distal sensory loss, and weakness and atrophy of the distal limb muscles. With an estimated global prevalence of 1 in 2500, CMT is the most commonly inherited disorder of the peripheral nervous system and may show autosomal dominant, recessive and X-linked modes of inheritance. Clinically, CMT has been divided into two main subtypes; the demyelinating neuropathies (CMT-1, CMT-3, CMT-4 and CMT-X) characterized by severely reduced motor nerve conduction velocities (mNCVs) (<38 m/s), and axonal neuropathies (CMT-2) in which mNCVs are normal or only slightly reduced in association with reduced amplitude of compound motor action potentials (CMAPs). In demyelinating disease, the most frequently implicated genes in this subgroup are PMP22, MPZ and GJB1. In the axonal form 20% of cases are caused by mutations in MFN2, a dominant form, and all other forms are rare resulting from mutations in over 18 genes identified to date. It is also recognized that some genes can cause both an axonal and a demyelinating phenotype e.g. GDAP1. With the application of more widespread genetic testing, broadening of the phenotypic spectrum that can be seen in association with mutations in GAN is coming to light [10]. Recently Roth and colleagues identified two patients with biallelic mutations in GAN, amongst a cohort of 13 who all had straight hair [11]. These individuals had normal intellect which lead the authors to propose that the absence of “kinky” hair correlated with a lower prevalence of significant CNS involvement.

Here, we report the identification of a novel missense mutation c.103G > T; p.Val35Phe in GAN (NC_000016.10:g.81315216G > T; NM_022041.3:c.103G > T; p.Val35Phe), as the underlying cause of sensory-motor axonal neuropathy in a large consanguineous family apparently affected by CMT-2. Whilst affected family members all present with classical features of neuropathy including distal weakness and foot deformity, it is noted that deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) were preserved and neither nystagmus, ataxia, nor changes in white matter on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were seen. Further all but one affected member of the family had straight hair.

Methods

Patients and family members

This report describes genetic and clinical investigations in an extended consanguineous Muslim Arab family from a single clan residing in a small village in Israel (Fig. 1). Detailed neurological, electrophysiological, and imaging studies were performed on the patients as well as on unaffected family members.
Fig. 1

Family pedigree and c.103G > T co-segregation. Extended family pedigree of the Israeli family investigated with genotypes showing the presence or absence of GAN c.103G > T in affected and unaffected subjects respectively, who have been included in this study

Molecular genetic analysis

In order to map the chromosomal location of the pathogenic variant, samples from the family were genotyped using an Illumina Human CytoSNP-12 array incorporating ~330,000 genetic markers, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

In order to identify the disease associated gene, whole-exome sequencing was performed on a single affected individual in this family (subject III:12, Fig. 1) to generate a profile of variants not present in publically available databases and rare sequence variants. Coding regions were captured by HiSeq2000 using paired-end (2 x 100) protocol at a mean coverage depth of 30X at Otogenetics Corporation (Norcross, GA, USA). The Agilent SureSelect Human All ExonV4 (51 Mb) enrichment kit was used for exome enrichment. Sequence reads were aligned to the human genome reference sequence [hg19] and read alignment, variant calling, and annotation were performed by DNAnexus (DNAnexus Inc., Mountain View, CA; https://dnanexus.com)

Results

Clinical and electrophysiological findings

All clinical findings are presented in Table 1; electrophysiological findings are presented in Table 2.
Table 1

Summary of clinical data in affected and unaffected subjects

Individual

c.103

Sex (M/F)

Onset

Distal weakness

DTR

Kinky hair

Foot deformity

Nystagmus

MRI white matter changes

Ataxia

Other features

Affected Individuals

 III:2*

T/T

M

1st decade

+++

- UE

-

Yes

No

N/A

No

Facial weakness. Speech difficulties

+ pat

- acill

 III:12

T/T

M

1st decade

+++

+

-

Yes

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:14

T/T

M

6y

++

+

-

Yes

No

No

No

 

 IV:15

T/T

M

6y

++

+

-

Yes

No

No

No

 

 IV:18

T/T

M

4y

+

++

curly

Yes

No

No

No

 

Unaffected Individuals

 III:1

G/G

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 III:9

G/G

M

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 III:11

G/T

M

-

 

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 III:13

G/T

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:1

G/T

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:2

G/T

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:3

G/T

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:16

G/T

F

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

 IV:17

G/T

M

-

-

++

-

No

No

N/A

No

 

*Individual III:2 is the father of individuals IV:14, IV:15, and IV:18 (see Fig. 1)

DTR deep tendon reflexes, UE upper extremities, pat patella, acill Achilles, N/A not available

Table 2

Electrophysiological data

Individual

Age (years)

Latency (ms)

CMAP (mV)

Motor nerve velocity (m/s)

Sensory nerve latency (ms)

SNAP (μV)

II:9

70

Median-4.6 (n < 4.2)

Median-13.9 (n > 4)

Median- 52 (n >49)

Median- 3.8 (n < 2.5)

Median-2.4

Ulnar- 3.7 (n)

Ulnar-8.3 (n > 6)

Ulnar-52 (n)

Ulnar-3.5 (n < 2.1)

 

Peroneal- 5.9 (n < 5.2)

Peroneal-1.7 (n > 2)

Peroneal-33 (n > 40)

Sural-absent

Sural- absent

II:10

70

Median 10.8

Median-1.5

Median- 38

Median – N/A

Median-absent

Ulnar-3.6 (n)

Ulnar-10

Ulnar-.56 (n)

Ulnar-2

Ulnar-6.2

Peroneal-5.1

Peroneal- 1

Tibial- 42

Sural-2.9 (n < 3.2)

Sural-19

III:12*

33

Median-5.5

Median-5.4

Median- 55.6

absent

absent

Ulnar- 5.6

Ulnar-1.5

Ulnar-50

Tibial& peroneal- N/A

Tibial-absent

Tibial-absent

Peroneal- absent

Peroneal- absent

IV:14*

6

Median-3.1

Median-6.1

Median- 60.7

Median- 2.8

Median-22

Ulnar-2.8

Ulnar-5

Ulnar-60

Ulnar-2.4

Ulnar-25

Tibial-4.2

Tibial-1.3

Tibial-35.6

 

Peroneal-4.1

 

Peroneal-56.4

 

normal

  

IV:15*

6

Median-3.7

Median-5.7

Median- 51.7

Median- 3

Median-56

Ulnar- 2.9

Ulnar-6.3

Ulnar- 66

Ulnar-3

Ulnar-42

Tibialis-5.1

Tibialis-3.1

Tibial- 41.8

Sural-3.5

Sural-9.9

Peroneal-4.1

Peroneal-0.5

Peroneal- 47.7

  

IV:18*

8

Median-4.5

Median-3.6

Median-64

absent

absent

Tibialis-4.4

Tibialis-1.4

Tibialis-50

Peroneal-5.7

Peroneal-2.1

Peroneal-59

*Affected individual

N/A not available

Index patients: IV:14 and IV:15

The index patients (IV:14, IV:15) are dizygotic twins, born to consanguineous parents (first cousins) after an uneventful pregnancy and delivery. Gross motor development was slow (both walked at age 30 months), but fine motor and speech development was normal. Both attended regular school, and academic performance was satisfactory.

The patients initially presented at our clinic at age 6 years for evaluation of abnormal gait. On physical examination, no dysmorphic features were noted. Hair was normal and not kinky. There were no cranial nerve abnormalities and no signs of nystagmus. Weakness of the ankle and toe extensors and flexors, peroneus muscles, and tibialis posterior muscles was documented (Medical Research Council grade 4/5), with slightly decreased vibration. DTRs were elicited. Pes planus was noted. Both patients exhibited a crouched gait pattern with externally rotated feet. Cerebellar function was normal. Neurophysiological studies revealed normal motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities, in association with a reduced amplitude CMAP of the right tibial nerve in patient IV:14 and of the right peroneal nerve in patient IV:15. MRI of the brain did not reveal white matter changes.

Tendon-lengthening surgery was performed to treat the contractures. The most recent follow-up evaluation was conducted at age 15 years. The distal weakness was more pronounced, although the patients were still ambulatory. One of the twins was overweight, further exacerbating his walking difficulties.

Patient III:12 – Father of the index patients

The father of the index patients (patient III:12), whose parents were also consanguineous, had been diagnosed with Charcot-Marie-Tooth and was wheelchair-bound by age 12 years. He completed 12 years of school despite mild learning difficulties.

Examination at the time of admission of the index patients, at age 33 years, revealed no dysmorphic features or hair abnormalities. Findings on cranial nerve examination were normal. Atrophy of the upper limbs was documented, with weakness of the small hand muscles, mainly interosseous. Vibration was slightly reduced, but sensation was otherwise normal. The lower limbs exhibited normal proximal muscle strength but severe weakness of the ankle and toe flexors and extensors, in addition to reduced vibration and proprioception of the toes. Deep tendon reflexes were elicited. Neurophysiology studies demonstrated widespread severe, predominantly axonal, sensorimotor neuropathy more marked in the legs.

Patient IV:18 – Brother of the index patients

The brother of the index patients (IV:18) presented to our clinic at age 4 years because of maternal concerns about gross motor impairment, similar to findings in his older brothers. He fell frequently. Past medical history revealed an uneventful pregnancy and delivery. Walking started at age 18 months and speech was delayed. He had moderately curly hair but it was not neither kinky nor frizzy. Other than curly hair, there were no dysmorphic features. Distal weakness was noted in the lower limbs with preserved reflexes, in addition to pes planus, crouched gait, and externally rotated feet. Babinski sign was positive. Neurophysiology studies performed at age 8 years demonstrated a mild axonal motor sensory polyneuropathy in the legs and arms with a mild-moderate reduction in compound motor action potential amplitude and absence of sensory conduction. Needle electromyography revealed no abnormalities except for mild early chronic reinnervation in the right tibialis anterior muscle. MRI of the brain was normal, with no apparent white matter changes.

Patient III:2 – Paternal uncle of the index patients

The index patients’ paternal uncle. He had frequent falls in childhood and later complained of hand weakness. He was wheelchair-bound in his mid-twenties. Although he was not diagnosed with learning difficulties, he did not proceed to high school. Examination at age 39 years, a few years after our index patients' admission, revealed no dysmorphic features or hair abnormalities. Mild facial weakness and speech dysarthria was noted. Atrophy of the upper limbs was documented with weakness of the small hand muscles, mainly interosseous. The lower limbs exhibited mild proximal muscle weakness, severe distal weakness, in addition to reduced sensation vibration and proprioception of the toes. DTRs were not elicited in the upper limbs. Neither were they elicited in the left patella and both Achilles tendons, however this is attributed to tendon-lengthening surgery. Foot deformity was noted.

Genetic findings

Inspection of the SNP genotypes of affected family members identified a single notable homozygous region of 2.15 Mb on chromosome 16q23.2-23.3, delimited by markers rs889518 and rs4783311 (Chr16:80,897,297-83,051,118 [hg38]), shared solely by affected individuals in the family. Multipoint linkage analysis was performed with Simwalk2 [12], using the SNP genotype data, assuming autosomal recessive inheritance, full penetrance and a disease allele frequency of 0.00001, achieving a LODMAX = 2.71 corresponding to the autozygous region. This region contains 31 genes and was considered very likely to harbor the pathogenic variant. After filtering, exome sequencing of DNA from a single affected individual identified only one likely deleterious variant within the 16q23.2-23.3 region, a single base substitution (NC_000016.10:g.81315216G > T; NM_022041.3:c.103G > T; p.Val35Phe) in GAN. Dideoxy sequence analysis confirmed co-segregation of the variant with the disease phenotype in the family with unaffected family members being wildtype or heterozygous for the variant. The variant is not present in genomic databases (Exome Variant Server, EVS; dbSNP; Human Gene Mutation Database, HGMD; ExAC). The c.103G > T nucleotide alteration is predicted to affect a stringently conserved amino acid across all species examined, and substitute a valine at codon 35 to phenylalanine (p.Val35Phe, Fig. 2). In silico mutation analysis provided conflicting predictions as to the functional outcome of the variant on the gigaxonin protein: PolyPhen-2 [13] HumDiv and HumVar both predicted the variant to be benign with scores of 0.108 and 0.021 respectively, while SIFT and PROVEAN [14] predicted the variant to be disease causing with scores of 0.017 and −2.78, respectively.
Fig. 2

Protein homology of GAN in various species and the p.Val35Phe mutant molecule. The mutation results in an amino acid substitution at Valine (indicated by the red box) to phenylalanine at position 35, a residue highly conserved across species

Unaffected family members had either a homozygous normal (G/G) phenotype or heterozygous G/T genotype, consistent with the recessive mode of inheritance of GAN. None presented any distal weakness, foot deformity, ataxia or nystagmus.

Discussion

In this work, a novel sequence alteration in the gene GAN, c.103G > T, was identified as most likely the underlying cause for a sensory-motor axonal neuropathy in a large consanguineous family presenting as CMT-2. Affected family members were all male, homozygous for the mutation and all presented with distal weakness, more pronounced in older individuals (generation III), consistent with the progressive nature of GAN. They all had foot deformities but none had nystagmus or ataxia and all had preserved DTR. Findings in clinical and imaging analyses, as well as medical history did not suggest CNS involvement. There was no evidence of significant intellectual disability or seizures. MRI studies, available only for the two index patients and their brother revealed no white matter changes. Nerve conduction studies showed reduced amplitudes with prolonged distal latencies and normal or prolonged conduction velocities which is consistent with axonal motor-sensory neuropathy.

The clinical presentation of affected individuals in this current family differs from the consanguineous Arab-Israeli family with GAN described by Abu Rashid and colleagues [8]. Although an intermediate phenotype, their patients had kinky hair, thick eyelashes and thick eyebrows, ataxia, spasticity and MRI changes, all characteristic of GAN and CNS involvement.

The gene GAN encodes the protein gigaxonin, a BTB-KELCH protein that plays a role in regulating intermediate filaments (IFs) [15] and the degradation of MAP1B light chain, which is critical to neuronal survival [16]. Based on sequence homology, it is predicted to be a substrate adaptor for Cul3-E3 ubiquitin ligase, and hypothesized to be involved in the ubiquitination and degradation of several IF proteins, including vimentin [17].

The c.103G > T nucleotide change is predicted to affect a stringently conserved amino acid across all species examined, and substitute a valine at residue 35 to phenylalanine (p.Val35Phe) within the BTB-domain of the protein. The BTB-domain has been established as the proteins homodimerization domain [18, 19], as well as its site of interaction with the E3 ligase, MYCBP2, and the heat shock proteins, HSP90AA1 and HSP90AB1 [20]. Boizot and colleagues showed that missense mutations in this region (p.Arg15Ser and p.Ala49Glu) can lead to destabilization of the protein resulting in a shorter half-life and lowered protein abundance [19]. Their predictions support the in-silico prediction of SIFT and PROVEAN [14] that our p.Val35Phe variant is disease-causing. Of note, they describe the phenotype of the p.Arg15Ser mutation as a moderate form of GAN, somewhat similar to ours, with very slow progression, no central nervous impairment and extended survival. Roth and colleagues [11] conducted a GAN natural history study on 13 patients, two of whom (c.130C > T, p.Gln44X; c.1420G > C, p.Gly474Arg; c.971C > T, p.Ala324Val; c.1391G > A, p.Cys464Tyr) lacked the characteristic tightly curly (kinky) hair. These patients’ gross motor function measure was better than those with curly hair in the cohort and defined their phenotype as milder. Both straight-haired patients in the Roth study had a distinctly different phenotype from ours (including occolomotor apraxia as compared to complete absence of ocular signs in our patients).

Zemmouri and colleagues [21] have described a consanguineous Algerian family with a CMT2-like presentation of GAN, characterized by late onset and little to no involvement of CNS. They were able to establish a linkage to the chromosome 16q locus, however, they did not find the exact nature of the mutation which was reported by Bormont and colleagues the same year [7].

In this study we found a novel missense mutation in the gene GAN in a consanguineous family that is most likely the underlying cause of a CMT2-like presentation of GAN. In the post- genomics era with easy access to gene panels and exome sequencing for clinical investigation the family presented here serves to highlight the need to proceed with caution when giving out prognostic information based on the genetic findings. The spectrum of phenotypes associated with mutations in many genes is broadening due to our ability to identify these variants with whole exome/genome sequencing in the absence of the classical phenotype. Classical GAN is a devastating disease but the family described here and reports of families such as documented by Roth and Abu-Rashid emphasize the need to acknowledge a wider phenotypic spectrum when counseling such families.

Further research is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms mediating the effects of mutations in specific Gigaxonin protein domains on aspects of the GAN disease presentation.

Conclusion

Our findings broaden the spectrum of phenotypes associated with GAN mutations and emphasize a need to proceed with caution when providing families with diagnostic or prognostic information based on either clinical or genetic findings alone.

Abbreviations

Ala: 

(amino acid symbol) Alanine

Arg: 

(amino acid symbol) Arginine

CMAPs: 

Compound motor action potentials

CNS: 

Central nervous system

Cys: 

(amino acid symbol) Cysteine

DTRs: 

Deep tendon reflexes

EMG: 

Electromyography

F: 

Female

GAN

(gene symbol) Giant axonal neuropathy

GAN: 

Giant axonal neuropathy

GDAP1

(gene symbol) Ganglioside induced differentiation associated protein 1

GJB1

(gene symbol) Gap junction protein, beta 1

Gln: 

(amino acid symbol) Glutamine

Gly: 

(amino acid symbol) Glycine

HSP90AA1: 

(protein symbol) Heat Shock Protein 90 kDa Alpha (Cytosolic), Class A Member 1

HSP90AB1: 

(protein symbol) Heat Shock Protein 90 kDa Alpha (Cytosolic), Class B Member 1

Ifs: 

Intermediate filaments

M: 

Male

m/s: 

Meters per second

MFN2

(gene symbol) Mitofusin 2

mNCVs: 

Motor nerve conduction velocities

MPZ

(gene symbol) Myelin protein zero

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

ms: 

Milliseconds

mV: 

Millivolts

MYCBP2: 

(protein symbol) MYC Binding Protein 2, E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase

Phe: 

(amino acid symbol) Phenylalanine

PMP22

(gene symbol) Peripheral myelin protein 22

SNAP: 

Sensory nerve action potential

Tyr: 

(amino acid symbol) Tyrosine

Val: 

(amino acid symbol) Valine

μV: 

Microvolts

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the family members for their involvement in this study. The authors are also grateful to the MRC and NRF for funding this research study.

Funding

This research was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Neurosciences Research Foundation (NRF).

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

SA, RS, YN, AMB and MEM carried out family recruitment, blood sampling and clinical analysis. AHC, BAC and MW conceived and designed the experiments. BAC and KESB performed the experiments. AHC, BAC, MW and KESB analyzed the data. AHC, MEM, MW and SA contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. SA, MEM, KESB, BAC, AHC and GH wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives for publication of study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Helsinki committee of the Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives before taking part in this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
(2)
Medical Research, RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre (Level 4), Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
(3)
Medical Genetics Unit, Floor 0, Jenner Wing, St. George’s University of London
(4)
Medical Research, Diabetes group, RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre (Level 3), Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
(5)
The Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Unit, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Raanana, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University

References

  1. Hentati F, Hentati E, Amouri R. Giant axonal neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:933–938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuhlenbaumer G, Young P, Oberwittler C, Hunermund G, Schirmacher A, Domschke K, Ringelstein B, Stogbauer F. Giant axonal neuropathy (GAN): case report and two novel mutations in the gigaxonin gene. Neurology. 2002;58:1273–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Koop O, Schirmacher A, Nelis E, Timmerman V, De Jonghe P, Ringelstein B, Rasic VM, Evrard P, Gartner J, Claeys KG, et al. Genotype-phenotype analysis in patients with giant axonal neuropathy (GAN). Neuromuscul Disord. 2007;17:624–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bomont P, Ioos C, Yalcinkaya C, Korinthenberg R, Vallat JM, Assami S, Munnich A, Chabrol B, Kurlemann G, Tazir M, Koenig M. Identification of seven novel mutations in the GAN gene. Hum Mutat. 2003;21:446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Asbury AK, Gale MK, Cox SC, Baringer JR, Berg BO. Giant axonal neuropathy--a unique case with segmental neurofilamentous masses. Acta Neuropathol. 1972;20:237–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg BO, Rosenberg SH, Asbury AK. Giant axonal neuropathy. Pediatrics. 1972;49:894–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bomont P, Cavalier L, Blondeau F, Ben Hamida C, Belal S, Tazir M, Demir E, Topaloglu H, Korinthenberg R, Tuysuz B, et al. The gene encoding gigaxonin, a new member of the cytoskeletal BTB/kelch repeat family, is mutated in giant axonal neuropathy. Nat Genet. 2000;26:370–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abu-Rashid M, Mahajnah M, Jaber L, Kornreich L, Bar-On E, Basel-Vanagaite L, Soffer D, Koenig M, Straussberg R. A novel mutation in the GAN gene causes an intermediate form of giant axonal neuropathy in an Arab-Israeli family. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17:259–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tazir M, Nouioua S, Magy L, Huehne K, Assami S, Urtizberea A, Grid D, Hamadouche T, Rautenstrauss B, Vallat JM. Phenotypic variability in giant axonal neuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2009;19:270–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang JJ, Liu IY, Wang MB, Srivatsan ES. A review of gigaxonin mutations in giant axonal neuropathy (GAN) and cancer. Hum Genet. 2016;135:675–684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roth LA, Johnson-Kerner BL, Marra JD, LaMarca NH, Sproule DM. The absence of curly hair is associated with a milder phenotype in Giant Axonal Neuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24:48–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sobel E, Lange K. Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:1323–37.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahammad S, Murthy SN, Didonna A, Grin B, Israeli E, Perrot R, Bomont P, Julien JP, Kuczmarski E, Opal P, Goldman RD. Giant axonal neuropathy-associated gigaxonin mutations impair intermediate filament protein degradation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1964–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Allen E, Ding J, Wang W, Pramanik S, Chou J, Yau V, Yang Y. Gigaxonin-controlled degradation of MAP1B light chain is critical to neuronal survival. Nature. 2005;438:224–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Furukawa M, He YJ, Borchers C, Xiong Y. Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:1001–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cullen VC, Brownlees J, Banner S, Anderton BH, Leigh PN, Shaw CE, Miller CC. Gigaxonin is associated with the Golgi and dimerises via its BTB domain. Neuroreport. 2004;15:873–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boizot A, Talmat-Amar Y, Morrogh D, Kuntz NL, Halbert C, Chabrol B, Houlden H, Stojkovic T, Schulman BA, Rautenstrauss B, Bomont P. The instability of the BTB-KELCH protein Gigaxonin causes Giant Axonal Neuropathy and constitutes a new penetrant and specific diagnostic test. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson-Kerner BL, Garcia Diaz A, Ekins S, Wichterle H. Kelch Domain of Gigaxonin Interacts with Intermediate Filament Proteins Affected in Giant Axonal Neuropathy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140157.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zemmouri R, Azzedine H, Assami S, Kitouni N, Vallat JM, Maisonobe T, Hamadouche T, Kessaci M, Mansouri B, Le Guern E, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2-like presentation of an Algerian family with giant axonal neuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2000;10:592–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement