Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exome sequencing identifies pathogenic variants of VPS13B in a patient with familial 16p11.2 duplication

BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:78

DOI: 10.1186/s12881-016-0340-0

Received: 3 May 2016

Accepted: 20 October 2016

Published: 10 November 2016

Abstract

Background

The recurrent microduplication of 16p11.2 (dup16p11.2) is associated with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) confounded by incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. This inter- and intra-familial clinical variability highlights the importance of personalized genetic counselling in individuals at-risk.

Case presentation

In this study, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) to look for other genomic alterations that could explain the clinical variability in a family with a boy presenting with NDD who inherited the dup16p11.2 from his apparently healthy mother. We identified novel splicing variants of VPS13B (8q22.2) in the proband with compound heterozygous inheritance. Two VPS13B mutations abolished the canonical splice sites resulting in low RNA expression in transformed lymphoblasts of the proband. VPS13B mutation causes Cohen syndrome (CS) consistent with the proband’s phenotype (intellectual disability (ID), microcephaly, facial gestalt, retinal dystrophy, joint hypermobility and neutropenia).

The new diagnosis of CS has important health implication for the proband, provides the opportunity for more meaningful and accurate genetic counselling for the family; and underscores the importance of longitudinally following patients for evolving phenotypic features.

Conclusions

This is the first report of a co-occurrence of pathogenic variants with familial dup16p11.2. Our finding suggests that the variable expressivity among carriers of rare putatively pathogenic CNVs such as dup16p11.2 warrants further study by WES and individualized genetic counselling of families with such CNVs.

Keywords

16p11.2 duplication Cohen syndrome Neuro-developmental disorders Variable expressivity Whole exome sequencing Case report

Background

Chromosome microarray analysis of subjects with NDD has uncovered a large number of rare copy number variations (CNVs); nevertheless, some pathogenic and putatively pathogenic CNVs detected in patients cannot completely explain complex patient phenotypes, particularly when an unaffected parent carries the same submicroscopic imbalance. One example of a susceptibility locus for NDD is the 16p11.2 region with ~600 kb deletions and duplications observed in ~1 % of autism and 1.5 % of children diagnosed with significant developmental or language delays compared to 0.04–0.07 % amongst control populations [1, 2]. Carriers of 16p11.2 CNV manifest a broad spectrum of neurocognitive phenotypes, ranging from ID [1, 3, 4], autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [5, 6], schizophrenia [7], congenital anomalies [4, 8] to individuals without a specific phenotype [3, 4, 8]. There is familial coincidence of both phenotypically affected and unaffected carriers in some families [1, 7, 8]. The estimated penetrance of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication are 46.8 % and 27.2 %, respectively [2]. Multiple studies demonstrated the power of WES to find the genetic etiology of clinical variability among such patients. WES helped to discover that the presence of variants on the non-CNV containing homolog chromosome may unmask biallelic mutations in an autosomal recessive condition [9, 10], or that damaging variants in other parts of the genome may contribute to such variable expressivity [11]. The results of these studies suggest that inconsistent phenotypes in patients with known pathogenic CNVs or with CNVs inherited from an unaffected parent may indicate the co-occurrence of secondary genomic events elsewhere in the genome.

In this study, we report that pathogenic variants of VPS13B located at chromosome 8 in a boy with NDD carrying a familial dup16p11.2 contribute to the clinical variability in this family.

Case presentation

The proband is an 11 year old boy introduced to our clinic with global developmental delay and verbal apraxia at the age of four. He is the third of four-children of non-consanguineous parents of Chinese descent. His mother and his paternal grand-mother have a history of recurrent spontaneous pregnancy losses with unknown cause. His parents and three siblings are apparently healthy (Fig. 1a). The proband was born after 39 weeks of uneventful pregnancy via caesarean section for fetal distress with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at one and five minutes after birth, respectively. His birth weight was 2175 gram (<3rd percentile (%ile)), length was 47 cm (10th %ile) and occipito-frontal circumference (OFC) was 34 cm (25th %ile). The patient exhibited feeding difficulty, low muscle tone, bilateral ptosis, club foot, bilateral undescended testes, and flexion contracture of hand and wrist. The proband’s laboratory diagnostic workup was normal and included routine karyotype, subtelomeric FISH, fragile X, biochemical assessment, cranial MRI and CT scan. Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 revealed a 709.2 kb duplication of 16p11.2 (29,425,199–30,134,432) in the proband, confirmed by FISH and parental studies indicating maternal inheritance. The proband’s siblings were not tested for dup16p11.2 per the family’s request.
Fig. 1

a Family pedigree. b Sanger sequencing analysis of VPS13B variants. I) Proband and his mother are carriers of splicing mutation of c.1426-1G > A. II) Proband and his father are carriers of splicing mutation of c.4157 + 1G > T (sequences of reverse strands are shown)

We examined the mother who is a carrier of dup16p11.2 for the possibility that apparently healthy carrier parents might have some unnoticed clinical features, and for the presence of phenotypic commonality with his child. She showed no sign of ID, ASD, psychiatric disorder (anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD)), underweight or microcephaly. She was also negative for history of other dup16p11.2 features including epilepsy, speech and motor delay, and congenital anomalies.

Genetic testing

DNA samples of family trios were sent to PerkinElmer Company for exome enrichment using the TruSeq Exome Enrichment Kit (Agilent v5 + UTR), followed by paired-end sequencing (Illumina HiSeq 2000, read length of 100 bp). Using Golden Helix (GH) software (SNP & Variation Suite 7.7.8), the WES data from a single VCF file for sequenced family members was analyzed (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Two novel splicing mutations of VPS13B (8q22.2) with compound heterozygous inheritance were identified in the proband and subsequently confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1b). A sequence variant of c.1426-1G > A located in the acceptor splice site of intron 10 was identified in Proband A and his mother. The second variant, a nucleotide change of G > T at c.4157 + 1 situated in the donor site of intron 27, was inherited from his father. Mutations and/or CNVs in the VPS13B gene lead to a rare autosomal recessive condition called Cohen syndrome (CS) [12].

Functional prediction tools used for WES data analysis anticipate the effect of non-synonymous variants (coding region). However, both variants of VPS13B are located at canonical splice sites. ALAMUT software predicted that two intronic variants of VPS13B would result in skipping of the exon 11 and 27. To confirm this prediction, we performed PCR on cDNA samples of proband and a control using two separate sets of primers covering exons 9–12 and 26–29 of VPS13B, followed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products. This confirmed that both variants abolish the canonical splice sites and create aberrant RNA sequences (Fig. 2). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for VPS13B demonstrated reduced expression in the proband compared to two controls (Additional file 1: Material and methods). The mother also showed reduced RNA expression compared to one control (Fig. 3). Other family members were not available for VPS13B or dup16p11.2 testing.
Fig. 2

Sanger sequencing of RT-PCR products of proband and control, using primers covering exons 9–12 and 26–29 of VPS13B. a The variant of c.1426-1G > A disrupted the following sequences and caused frameshift in the proband. The orange arrow shows the first bp of exon 11 in the normal control. b The variant of 4157 + 1G > T disrupted following sequences, and caused frameshift in the proband. The orange arrow shows the first bp of exon 27 in the normal control

Fig. 3

Expression study of VPS13B gene. The mean RNA expression of VPS13B calculated from three different time-series of RNA extraction in the proband, his mother and two normal controls. The relative expression of VPS13B is <0.5 fold in the proband and >0.6 fold in his mother. Error bars indicate standard errors from three replicates

The VPS13B gene, also known as COH1 (OMIM: 607817), is approximately 864 kb in length and located on chromosome 8q22.2. It consists of 62 exons encoding a transmembrane protein of 4022 amino acids [12]. VPS13B is a peripheral membrane protein that is required for function, orientation and structural integrity of the Golgi apparatus and thus plays a role in vesicle-mediated sorting and intracellular protein transport [13, 14]. Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations/CNVs of VPS13B cause CS [12]. 

Intronic point mutations within donor and acceptor sites at mRNA splice junctions typically cause mRNA mis-splicing, leading to subsequent nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and altered protein with effect on the clinical phenotype [15]. Indeed, Sanger sequencing of RT-PCR product corresponding to each specific VPS13B variant demonstrated that both variants create aberrant RNA sequences and frameshift and thus probably lead to NMD. Moreover, the RNA expression level of VPS13B in the proband was significantly reduced compared to two controls. VPS13B expression in his mother was intermediate between the proband and one control, suggesting that partial loss-of-function in carriers of autosomal recessive disorders is not sufficient to produce a complete disease phenotype.

Absence of dup16p11.2 -related phenotype in the mother, presence of some CS features in the proband, and the discovery of pathogenic VPS13B mutations warranted re-evaluation of our patient at 10 years of age. CS has a broad clinical phenotype spectrum including ID, microcephaly, hypotonia, dysmorphic facial features, truncal obesity, slender extremities, joint hypermobility, myopia, retinal dystrophy, intermittent isolated neutropenia, and happy personality. Neutropenia is characterized as a neutrophil count of <1.5 × 109/L in children and <1.8 × 109/L in adults [16]. The facial gestalt includes down-slanting palpebral fissures, wave-shaped eyelids, thick eyebrows and eyelashes, low hairline, prominent and beak-shaped nose, malar hypoplasia, short philtrum, high-arched palate, maxillary prognathia and prominent central incisors [1719]. Patients with CS grimace when they are asked to smile [12, 20]. Other signs and symptoms include short stature and scoliosis [12, 20]. In addition, individuals with CS have high rates of ASD or autistic features [21]. The estimated prevalence of CS is 1:105,000 [22], however, its frequency may be considerably higher due to the fact that patients are often not diagnosed until they reach their teenage or adult years. The early diagnosis of CS is challenging because facial features are less noticeable in pre-school age, truncal obesity may evolve in late-childhood, neutropenia is rarely identified due to its intermittent pattern and absence of clinical consequences, and diagnosis of retinal dystrophy usually occurs in later childhood [16, 17, 20].

Reverse phenotyping of our patient at 10 years of age unequivocally confirmed a pattern of features consistent with CS (Table 1). Table 1 shows the presence or absence of clinical features observed in our proband relative to patients with CS [17, 18, 2024], or dup16p11.2 [4, 8, 2527].
Table 1

Clinical phenotypes of proband, and their presence/absence among reported cases of CS and dup16p11.2

  

Reported findings in patients

Proband’s clinical findings

Cohen syndrome

dup16p11.2

Pregnancy/birth

Reduced fetal activity

+

-

Low birth weight

+

-

Feeding difficulty

+

-

Neurocognitive

DD/IDab

+

+

ASDb

+

+

Happy/friendly dispositiona

+

-

Hypotoniab

+

+

Verbal apraxia

+

-

Motor delayb

+

+

Poor motor coordination

+

+

Brisk reflexes

+

-

Build/stature

Underweightb (≤4y/o)

-

+

Short stature

+

+

Truncal obesitya (childhood)

+

-

Cranium/hair

Microcephalyab (postnatal)

+

+

Flat occiput

-

-

Double hair whorls

-

-

Low hairlinea (anterior)

+

+

Thick haira

+

-

Forehead/face/nose

Narrow forehead

+

-

Micrognathia/mild retrognathia

+

+

Malar hypoplasia

+

-

Depressed nasal root

-

-

Short triangular nose

-

-

Mouth/oral region

Small mouth

+

-

Thick upper lip

+

-

Short/smooth philtruma

+

+

High-arched palate

+

+

Thickened alveolar ridges

-

-

Prominent upper central incisors

+

-

Eye/eye globe/vision

Hypertelorism

+

+

Ptosis (bilateral)

+

-

Blepharophimosis

-

-

Wave shaped eyelidsa

+

-

Thick eyebrowa

+

-

Long/thick eyelashesa

+

-

Myopiaa

+

+

Diffuse retinal dystrophya

+

-

Ears/hearing

Large ears

+

+

Posteriorly rotated ears

+

+

Auricular pits

+

+

Hearing loss (unilateral sensorineural)

+

-

Abdomen/thorax

Diastasis recti

-

-

Hypoplastic nipples

-

-

Extremities/musculoskeletal

Slender extremities/tapered fingersa

+

+

Joint hypermobilitya

+

+

Club foot (bilateral)

+

-

Sandal gap

+

+

Scoliosis

+

+

Genitalia/urinary tract

Hypospadias

-

+

Cryptorchidism

+

+

Haematology/Immunology

Chronic anemia

+

-

Recurrent infection (UTI)

+

-

Intermittent neutropeniaa

+

-

aDiagnostic criteria for CS

bMost observed findings among patients with dup16p11.2

Being underweight is a known feature of dup 16p11.2. Although the proband was underweight at birth, his weight changed with age to the 5–10th %ile at the age of 10. He also developed truncal obesity with slender extremities, mild scoliosis, and evolving facial gestalt consistent with CS. Similar to the report by El Chehadeh-Djebbar et al. [17], our study suggests that some CS features are age-dependent and evolve later in childhood (Table 2).
Table 2

Evolving clinical features of proband

Evolving features

4y/o

10y/o

Weight

<3rd %ile

5–10th %ile

Oval face

No

Yes

Truncal obesity

No

Yes

Down-slanting, wavy palpebral fissures

No

Yes

Short and smooth philtrum

No

Yes

Long slender distal extremities/fingers

No

Yes

Spine abnormality

No

Yes

Conclusion

Inherited dup16p11.2 by itself cannot explain the variable expressivity among NDD patients when their carrier parents are unaffected. We utilized WES in a family with a child presenting with NDD carrying dup16p11.2 inherited from his unaffected mother, and searched for sequence changes that could explain this clinical variability. We discovered that compound heterozygous variants of VPS13B contribute to the proband’s phenotypic features. The new CS diagnosis helps in screening and earlier management of scoliosis, periodontal disease and tooth loss, early cataract, vision loss, and premature aging [24] in the proband; and provides more informed genetic counselling for the family.

Our study suggests that NDD patients with dup16p11.2 may show additional pathogenic SNVs in their genome, which significantly influence phenotype heterogeneity and the genetic counselling of families with putatively pathogenic CNVs showing variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance. Genomic microarray is a valuable first-tier test for the postnatal evaluation of individuals with NDD including ID, ASD, and/or multiple congenital anomalies. However, coupling of microarray with WES or whole genome data analyses will facilitate a more comprehensive and accurate analysis of genetic causes of NDD, heighten understanding of the etiology of variable expressivity among NDD patients, and optimize clinically-informed and effective genetic counselling and personalized management options.

Abbreviations

%ile: 

Percentile

ASD: 

Autism spectrum disorder

CNV: 

Copy number variation

CS: 

Cohen syndrome

Dup: 

Microduplication

ID: 

Intellectual disability

NDD: 

Neurodevelopmental disorders

NMD: 

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

OCD: 

Obsessive-compulsive disorders

OFC: 

Occipito-frontal circumference

qPCR: 

Real-time quantitative PCR

WES: 

Whole exome sequencing

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the families and the patients for their invaluable cooperation and participation.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) (Project Number: MOP-74502), BC Children’s Hospital Foundation (Project Number: KRZ75146) and BC Child and Family Research Institute (CFRI) (Project Number: 20R20410).

Availability of data and material

All relevant data are included in the manuscript and Additional file 1.

Authors’ contribution

SML and ERS designed and initiated the study, monitored data collection and analysis for the study and revised the paper. JD contributed to the study design, analysed both clinical and WES data, implemented the technical methods, drafted and revised the paper. CC contributed to family recruitment, sample collection and genetic counselling. FT and YQ helped with utilizing Golden helix software. SM helped with technical parts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication of respective case presentations was obtained for each participant.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The family was recruited through the B.C. Provincial Medical Genetics Program and Child & Family Research Institute of BC Children’s and Women’s Health Center. Ethics approval for clinical research involving human subjects was obtained through the Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, B.C.). Samples from anonymized unaffected male and female individuals were used as controls for expression studies. Written informed consents were obtained from each participant.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Genetics, Children’s and Women’s Health Center of BC and Children’s and Women’s Health Center of BC and Univeristy of British Columbia
(2)
Department of Pathology (Cytogenetics), Children’s and Women’s Hopsital of BC and Children’s and Women’s Health Center of BC and Univeristy of British Columbia
(3)
BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute

References

  1. Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):667–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Eichler EE, et al. Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations. Genet Med. 2013;15(6):478–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlsma EK, Gijsbers AC, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JH, et al. Extending the phenotype of recurrent rearrangements of 16p11.2: deletions in mentally retarded patients without autism and in normal individuals. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52(2-3):77–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shinawi M, Liu P, Kang SH, et al. Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. J Med Genet. 2010;47(5):332–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marshall CR, Noor A, Vincent JB, et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82(2):477–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kumar RA, Marshall CR, Badner JA, et al. Association and mutation analyses of 16p11.2 autism candidate genes. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4582.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. McCarthy SE, Makarov V, Kirov G, et al. Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1223–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez BA, Roberts W, Chung B, et al. Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genet. 2010;47(3):195–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McDonald-McGinn DM, Fahiminiya S, Revil T, et al. Hemizygous mutations in SNAP29 unmask autosomal recessive conditions and contribute to atypical findings in patients with 22q11.2DS. J Med Genet. 2013;50(2):80–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Paciorkowski AR, Keppler-Noreuil K, Robinson L, et al. Deletion 16p13.11 uncovers NDE1 mutations on the non-deleted homolog and extends the spectrum of severe microcephaly to include fetal brain disruption. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(7):1523–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Classen CF, Riehmer V, Landwehr C, et al. Dissecting the genotype in syndromic intellectual disability using whole exome sequencing in addition to genome-wide copy number analysis. Hum Genet. 2013;132(7):825–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolehmainen J, Black GC, Saarinen A, et al. Cohen syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel gene, COH1, encoding a transmembrane protein with a presumed role in vesicle-mediated sorting and intracellular protein transport. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6):1359–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Seifert W, Kuhnisch J, Maritzen T, et al. Cohen syndrome-associated protein, COH1, is a novel, giant Golgi matrix protein required for Golgi integrity. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(43):37665–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Seifert W, Kuhnisch J, Maritzen T, et al. Cohen syndrome-associated protein COH1 physically and functionally interacts with the small GTPase RAB6 at the Golgi complex and directs neurite outgrowth. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(6):3349–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen X, Truong TT, Weaver J, et al. Intronic alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: effect on mRNA splicing fidelity and expression. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(5):427–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Seifert W, Holder-Espinasse M, Kuhnisch J, et al. Expanded mutational spectrum in Cohen syndrome, tissue expression, and transcript variants of COH1. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(2):E404–420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. El Chehadeh-Djebbar S, Blair E, Holder-Espinasse M, et al. Changing facial phenotype in Cohen syndrome: towards clues for an earlier diagnosis. Euro J Hum Genet. 2013;21(7):736–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurmerinta K, Pirinen S, Kovero O, et al. Craniofacial features in Cohen syndrome: an anthropometric and cephalometric analysis of 14 patients. Clin Genet. 2002;62(2):157–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia-Ballesta C, Perez-Lajarin L, Lillo OC, et al. New oral findings in Cohen syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(6):681–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kivitie-Kallio S, Norio R. Cohen syndrome: essential features, natural history, and heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet. 2001;102(2):125–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Howlin P, Karpf J, Turk J. Behavioural characteristics and autistic features in individuals with Cohen Syndrome. Eur Child Adoles Psychiatry. 2005;14(2):57–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kivitie-Kallio S, Larsen A, Kajasto K, et al. Neurological and psychological findings in patients with Cohen syndrome: a study of 18 patients aged 11 months to 57 years. Neuropediatrics. 1999;30(4):181–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu TW, Chahrour MH, Coulter ME, et al. Using whole-exome sequencing to identify inherited causes of autism. Neuron. 2013;77 Suppl 2:259–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Douzgou S, Petersen MB. Clinical variability of genetic isolates of Cohen syndrome. Clin Genet. 2011;79(6):501–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bedoyan JK, Kumar RA, Sudi J, et al. Duplication 16p11.2 in a child with infantile seizure disorder. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(6):1567–74.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaaf CP, Goin-Kochel RP, Nowell KP, et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum of the 16p11.2 chromosomal rearrangements: three patients with syringomyelia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(2):152–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Filges I, Sparagana S, Sargent M, et al. Brain MRI abnormalities and spectrum of neurological and clinical findings in three patients with proximal 16p11.2 microduplication. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(8):2003–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement