Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Germline activating MTOR mutation arising through gonadal mosaicism in two brothers with megalencephaly and neurodevelopmental abnormalities

  • Cameron Mroske1,
  • Kristen Rasmussen2,
  • Deepali N. Shinde1,
  • Robert Huether1,
  • Zoe Powis1,
  • Hsiao-Mei Lu1,
  • Ruth M. Baxter1,
  • Elizabeth McPherson2 and
  • Sha Tang1Email author
BMC Medical Genetics201516:102

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-015-0240-8

Received: 3 July 2015

Accepted: 3 October 2015

Published: 5 November 2015

Abstract

Background

In humans, Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (MTOR) encodes a 300 kDa serine/ threonine protein kinase that is ubiquitously expressed, particularly at high levels in brain. MTOR functions as an integrator of multiple cellular processes, and in so doing either directly or indirectly regulates the phosphorylation of at least 800 proteins. While somatic MTOR mutations have been recognized in tumors for many years, and more recently in hemimegalencephaly, germline MTOR mutations have rarely been described.

Case presentation

We report the successful application of family-trio Diagnostic Exome Sequencing (DES) to identify the underlying molecular etiology in two brothers with multiple neurological and developmental lesions, and for whom previous testing was non-diagnostic. The affected brothers, who were 6 and 23 years of age at the time of DES, presented symptoms including but not limited to mild Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), megalencephaly, gross motor skill delay, cryptorchidism and bilateral iris coloboma. Importantly, we determined that each affected brother harbored the MTOR missense alteration p.E1799K (c.5395G>A). This exact variant has been previously identified in multiple independent human somatic cancer samples and has been shown to result in increased MTOR activation. Further, recent independent reports describe two unrelated families in whom p.E1799K co-segregated with megalencephaly and intellectual disability (ID); in both cases, p.E1799K was shown to have originated due to germline mosaicism. In the case of the family reported herein, the absence of p.E1799K in genomic DNA extracted from the blood of either parent suggests that this alteration most likely arose due to gonadal mosaicism. Further, the p.E1799K variant exerts its effect by a gain-of-function (GOF), autosomal dominant mechanism.

Conclusion

Herein, we describe the use of DES to uncover an activating MTOR missense alteration of gonadal mosaic origin that is likely to be the causative mutation in two brothers who present multiple neurological and developmental abnormalities. Our report brings the total number of families who harbor MTOR p.E1799K in association with megalencephaly and ID to three. In each case, evidence suggests that p.E1799K arose in the affected individuals due to gonadal mosaicism. Thus, MTOR p.E1799K can now be classified as a pathogenic GOF mutation that causes megalencephaly and cognitive impairment in humans.

Keywords

Diagnostic exome sequencingFamily-trioMTORAutismASDMacrocephalyMegalencephalyGonadal mosaicismGain-of-functionMissense alteration

Background

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a group of neuro-developmental maladies marked by social/communication impairments, repetitive behaviors, and sensory reactivity issues [1]. Even though the molecular etiology of autism is genetically heterogeneous, up to 10 % of cases are associated with a distinct genetic condition such as Fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, phenylketonuria, or Rett syndrome [25]. Furthermore, 20 % of autistic patients exhibit macrocephaly [6]. In a number of these cases, germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene PTEN (P hosphatase and Ten sin Homologue) have been revealed to be the underlying cause of disease [711]. It has been estimated that the rate of PTEN disruption is up to 5 % in ASD patients with macrocephaly [12].

PTEN functions as a negative regulator of the PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase)–AKT (AKT/Protein Kinase B)-MTOR (Mammalian Target of Rapamycin) signaling cascade, a simplified version of which is depicted in Fig. 1. At the center of this pathway lies MTOR, a 300 kDa serine/threonine protein kinase encoded by the MTOR gene, which in humans is situated on chromosome 1p36 [13]. By integrating upstream signals to downstream effector molecules like ribosomal P70 S6 (S6) and ribosomal P70 S6 kinase (S6K), the PI3K-AKT-MTOR axis serves to regulate a myriad of biological processes including cell growth and proliferation, apoptosis, protein synthesis, and transcription [14]. MTOR is known to mediate normal brain development by playing key roles in axonal and dendritic growth, and in the establishment and maintenance of synaptic plasticity [15].
Fig. 1

Simplified representation of the MTOR signaling network. Green arrows indicate the specific substrates shown to be phosphorylated/over-stimulated by p.E1799K-hyperactivated MTOR kinase. Other symbols and abbreviations used: stimulatory effects ( ); inhibitory effects ( ); 4E-BP1 (Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein 1); AKT (AKT/ Protein Kinase B); MTOR (Mammalian Target of Rapamycin); PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase); PTEN (Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog); RAS (Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog); S6K (Ribosomal P70 S6 Kinase 1); TORC1 (MTOR Complex 1); TORC2 (MTOR Complex 2) TSC1 (Tuberous Sclerosis 1); TSC2 (Tuberous Sclerosis 2)

As evidenced by the association of PTEN dysfunction with ASD and macrocephaly, hyper-activation of the PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling cascade is an underlying factor for neurological disease and abnormal development. Such ‘TORopathies’ include neurological ailments like focal cortical malformations (FCM), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), and hemimegalencephaly, all of which are highly associated with epilepsy [16, 17]. Furthermore, hyperactivation of the MTOR axis has also been associated with somatic cancer [18].

Although specific molecular lesions have been defined for some TORopathies--for example, in cases where PTEN is disrupted--in many instances it remains difficult to pinpoint the exact molecular defect due to the complexity of the MTOR signaling network [17]. Even so, the emergence of next generation sequencing (NGS) has greatly facilitated the search for genes and pathogenic variants that underlie neurological disease. Several recent reports have detailed the successful use of whole exome sequencing (WES) to uncover both somatic and germline activating alterations within MTOR itself. [1923] These clinical studies describe damaging MTOR alleles in unrelated probands who present overlapping neurological symptoms and brain defects [1923]. In a recent cancer study, Grabiner and colleagues accessed publicly available sequencing data from tumor samples to uncover 33 MTOR alterations that conferred hyperactivation of the MTOR signaling pathway within cancer cells. These alterations clustered around six distinct regions in the C-terminal half of the protein [18].

Herein, we present the clinical and genetic investigation of two brothers affected with macrocephaly and ASD. Diagnostic Exome Sequencing (DES) identified a GOF MTOR alteration, p.E1799K, to be the causative mutation in this family. Co-segregation and short tandem repeat (STR) analyses revealed that MTOR p.E1799K likely originated as a consequence of gonadal mosaicism.

Case presentation

Clinical description

Table 1 lists the major clinical features displayed by the proband and his brother, as well as the features of additional patients who harbor MTOR p.E1799K but who are unrelated to the family described herein. The proband, who presented to medical genetics clinic at age 3 with macrocephaly, bilateral iris colobomas and gross motor delay, had a mildly unusual appearance, which was primarily due to macrocephaly with a prominent forehead (Fig. 2a, left panels). The proband was the product of an uncomplicated pregnancy and was large for his gestational age, with a weight of 2950 g (97 %) at 35 weeks; birth head circumference was not recorded. Since infancy, his linear growth and weight have been normal; however, macrocephaly was noted by 6 months, which prompted a head ultrasound. The result showed no evidence of hydrocephalus. Since 3 years of age, the proband’s head growth has been tracking parallel to, and 6 standard deviations above the mean. Investigation by magnetic resonance imaging revealed megalencephaly. Bilateral iris colobomas with normal posterior poles were noted at birth, and the proband wears glasses for strabismus. During infancy, he displayed hyperinsulinemia, which was managed through frequent feedings and administration of diazoxide. He continues to display asthma, as well as persistent food allergies that manifest through gastrointestinal and cutaneous symptoms.
Table 1

Clinical Findings Associated with MTOR E1799Ka

 

Proband

Sibling

Baynam 1

Baynam 2

Baynam 3

Lgab

+

+

-

+

+

Postnatal height/weight

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Unknown

Macrocephaly

+5SD

+5SD

>+3SD

>+3SD

>+3SD

MRI

Megalencephaly

Megalencephaly

Mild ventricular prominence

Megalencephaly

Unknown

Hypogenesis of corpus callosum

Perisylvian polymicrogyria,

Small pons & medulla

Hypogenesis of corpus callosum

Gray matter heterotopia

Intellectual disability

Mild disability/autism

Moderate disability/autism

Hyperactive/speech delay

Marked global delay

Marked global delay

Seizures

-

-

+

+

+

Eye

Iris coloboma

Iris coloboma

-

-

-

Noonan-like face

-

-

+

+

+

Small chest/large abdomen

-

-

+

+

+

aThis table does not include the case of an additional patient who harbors MTOR E1799K (Ghahramani et al., ACMG 2015) due to lack of access to the patient's detailed clinical information

bLarge for gestational age

Fig. 2

Clinical presentation and co-segregation analysis. a) Photographs of the proband (left column) and his affected brother (right column) at different ages. b) Familial co-segregation/ Sanger sequencing analyses indicate that the affected brothers are heterozygous for MTOR c.5395G>A, p.E1799K (red arrows); in contrast, both parents are homozygous for the wild type allele. These results strongly suggest that c.5395G>A (p.E1799K) arose due to gonadal mosaicism in one of the parents. Chromatograms are shown beneath each member of the pedigree. Note that ‘+’ indicates whole exome sequencing was performed, while open shapes represent unaffected family members; the black shapes represent the affected brothers

The proband required surgery for undescended testes and an inguinal hernia. He did not display any unusual skin pigmentation in the genital area. Further, he has never displayed seizures. Initially hypotonic with delayed gross motor milestones, the proband walked at 18 months but remained somewhat hypotonic. His early language milestones appeared normal, but he subsequently exhibited significant social delays that were interpreted as mild ASD. Testing at age 7 revealed that his overall cognitive ability rated in the mildly impaired range. Previous genetic testing, which included PTEN sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis, did not reveal any molecular abnormalities.

The proband’s older brother, who had previously displayed clinical features including macrocephaly, unilateral iris coloboma and autism, presented an unusual appearance, mainly due to severe macrocephaly, a prominent forehead, and deep set eyes surrounded by dark circles (Fig. 2a, right panels). The product of an uncomplicated pregnancy, the elder brother was born at 36 weeks and was large for his gestational age, with a weight of 3400 g (>97 %) and head circumference of 36 cm (>97 %). Although his subsequent linear growth and weight were normal, his macrocephaly nevertheless persisted. Since age 2, his head grew parallel to the norm but tracked 6 standard deviations above the mean, reaching an adult circumference of 65 cm. MRI scans revealed only megalencephaly. Although he is lactose intolerant and displays mild asthma, he does not display the severe allergies suffered by the proband. Unilateral iris coloboma was noted at birth and he has required several surgeries for strabismus; otherwise, his vision has been normal. In addition, he underwent surgery for undescended testes. The older brother has never had seizures; however, he was hypotonic and displayed significant delays in both speech and motor skills. Furthermore, repeated testing during childhood showed that he presented mild to moderate intellectual disability. His speech and social skills remained significantly below other developmental metrics, and as a teenager he was diagnosed with autism. Karyotype and Fragile–X test results were normal.

The brothers’ parents, who are healthy and non-consanguineous, possess normal intelligence, regular head circumference, and normal eyes. The father is of Norwegian, German and Bohemian descent, while the mother is of mixed European and Japanese ancestry. It should be noted that in addition to conceiving/giving birth to the proband and his brother, the parents/mother suffered a miscarriage due to trisomy 18. Furthermore, a maternal nephew displays mild autism despite having normal intelligence, and the paternal great grandmother was stated to have an iris coloboma, though no records are available to confirm this. No one else in the family has been reported to have macrocephaly or significant cognitive disability.

Due to the proband’s unique combination of symptoms, that is, macrocephaly and mild ASD, as well as normal PTEN sequencing results and normal comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array results, DES was undertaken at age 6 years. We performed family trio-DES on genomic DNA (gDNA) isolated from the blood leukocytes of the proband, mother and brother. We then analyzed the resultant NGS data through bioinformatic filtering, inheritance modeling and finally, expert medical review. In so doing, we discovered that the likely molecular lesion underlying the brothers’ symptoms is the MTOR missense alteration, p.E1799K (c.5395G>A).

Methods

Statement of ethics

All research described in this case report was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Furthermore, the clinical information presented herein was collected during the routine clinical care of a patient in the United States; thus, in accordance with US law, this study is exempt from Institutional Research Board approval. In order to perform the variant filtering and co-segregation analysis that are integral to the exome trio sequencing test, it is necessary to include relevant family member samples in the sequencing trio.  This format, which is currently a standard approach for clinical exome testing, is explicitly stated on the test requisition form. The mother of the patient approved the inclusion of all family members in the test. Further, all subjects provided signed, written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent from the parents of the 6 year-old proband, as well as the written informed consent from the 23 year-old brother have been obtained for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Diagnostic exome sequencing (DES)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood extracted from each family member utilizing the QIAsymphony gDNA extraction system (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Samples were prepared using either the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) [24] or the SeqCap EZ VCRome 2.0 system (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI) [25]. Briefly, each DNA sample was sheared, blunt-end repaired, and ligated to indexed adapters. Utilizing solution-based hybridization with oligonucleotide probes, the coding exons and neighboring intronic sequence of each genome were enriched, while off-target sequences were washed away. The resultant enriched exome libraries were applied to the solid surface flow cell of an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA) for clonal amplification and sequencing using paired-end, 100-cycle chemistry.

NGS data analysis

The acquisition and processing of data, alignment of sequence to Genome Reference Consortium Human genome build 37 (GRCh37), and bioinformatic filtering were performed as described in Farwell et al., 2014 [26]. Initial data processing/base calling, including extraction of cluster intensities, was performed using RTA 1.12.4 (HiSeq Control Software 1.4.5). The sequence quality filtering script was executed using Illumina CASAVA software (ver 1.8.2, Illumina, Hayward, CA). Sequencing run metrics, including data yield (Mbases), %PF (pass-filter), number of reads, per cent of raw clusters per lane, and quality scores, were recorded in the Demultiplex_Stats.htm file and verified to surpass quality thresholds. Sequences were aligned to the human genome reference sequence GRCh37 and variant calls were generated using CASAVA and Pindel [27]. All exonic sequence and a minimum of 2 bases of flanking intronic sequence were analyzed. Data analysis focused on nonsense variants, small insertions and deletions, canonical splice site alterations, and non-synonymous missense alterations. Previously described gene mutations and polymorphisms were screened using resources that included the Human Gene Mutation Database Professional 2011.3 (HGMD 2011.3) [28], the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP) [29], 1000 genomes [30], HapMap data [31] and NCBI resources such as PubMed. Importantly, the in silico filtering pipeline protected all variants annotated within the HGMD 2011.3 [28] and/ or the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. Stepwise filtering included the removal of common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), intergenic and 3′/5′ UTR (untranslated region) variants, non-splice-related intronic variants, and synonymous variants. Remaining variants were filtered for family history using models of inheritance. For every filtered variant, Ambry Variant Analyzer (AVA) was utilized to annotate the data, which included nucleotide and amino acid conservation; biochemical nature of the amino acid substitution; population frequency as tabulated in the ESP and 1000 genomes [30] databases; and finally, the impact of the nucleotide substitution on protein function, as predicted by the in silico modeling algorithms PolyPhen [32] and SIFT [33]. Importantly, each candidate alteration was reviewed by a molecular geneticist in order to assess the likelihood of pathogenicity. NGS alignments were viewed using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) software (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA) [34].

Microsatellite analysis

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was performed on each family member. Briefly, seven independent loci situated on separate chromosomes were amplified with fluorescently labeled primers and the resultant products electrophoresed on an ABI3730 DNA sequencer.

Co-segregation analysis

Candidate alterations identified as potentially causative were confirmed using automated fluorescence dideoxy Sanger sequencing. Co-segregation analysis was performed on each available family member. Target specific primers were designed to include 5′ terminal sense and antisense sequencing tags. The gene-specific moieties of the primers were designed with the aid of PrimerZ [35]; oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) and sequencing was performed on an automated ABI3730 DNA sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to standard procedures.

Computational-structural modeling

The crystal structure of MTOR (PDB:4JSP) was used to model the location of the observed variant, MTOR p.E1799 [36]. Visualization of the local environment structure and overlap of the variant amino acid were performed in PyMOL (The Open Source PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.x Schrödinger, LLC).

Results and discussion

Family trio DES coupled to bioinformatic analysis identifies MTOR p.E1799K as the likely genetic lesion

Exome sequencing of the family trio (proband, mother and brother) resulted in an average of 6.82 Gb being collected per sample. The average exome read depth/mean fold-coverage was 65.64 per sample, with an average of 93.13 % of bases covered at least 10-fold. On average, 81 % of bases had a quality score of Q30 or higher. Overall, the average base-call mean quality score for the family trio exceeded Q32 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Stepwise filtering of common SNPs, intergenic and 3′/5′ UTR variants, non-splice-related intronic variants, and synonymous variants resulted in approximately 11,000 variants being associated with each trio member (Additional file 2: Table S2). Subsequent filtering based on family history and inheritance modeling (autosomal dominant/recessive, X-linked dominant/recessive, and Y-linked) within the trio narrowed the list of candidates to 36 genes and 42 unique alterations (Additional file 3: Table S3). After manual review of each alteration in order to rule out sequencing artifacts and polymorphisms, followed by expert medical interpretation to rule out genes lacking clinical overlap, the list of candidates was narrowed to 2 genes, each with a unique alteration. These notable candidate genes, along with their respective alterations and corresponding in silico prediction scores, are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Notable candidate genes/alterations

Gene

RefSeq Isoform

Variant/Coordinatesa

SIFT Score (Prediction)

Polyphen2_HDIV Score (Prediction)

Polyphen2_HVAR Score (Prediction)

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (MTOR)

NM_004958

Chr1:11190804C>T c.5395G>A p.E1799K

0.133 (Tolerated)

0.878 (Possibly Damaging)

0.463 (Possibly Damaging)

Oligophrenin-1 (OPHN1)

NM_002547

ChrX:67272394C>T c.2363G>A p.R788Q

0.130 (Tolerated)

0.995 (Probably Damaging)

0.457 (Possibly Damaging)

aGenomic coordinates correspond to GRCh37/hg19. Note that at the genomic level, both the MTOR and the OLPHN1 variants are notated by their complementary bases. This is due to the fact that each gene is encoded by the minus strand of its respective chromosome

One of the candidates under consideration was an Oligophrenin-1 (OPHN1) variant of uncertain significance (VUS), c.2363G>A (p.R788Q). Both the proband and his brother were hemizygous for this VUS, while their mother was heterozygous. OPHN1 disruption has been shown to cause syndromic X-linked intellectual disability with cerebellar hypoplasia in affected individuals, and it also results in distinctive facial features [37]. Although one brother’s facial appearance demonstrated some similarity to the faces of OPHN1-mutated individuals, the overall set of traits displayed by the family herein is incongruous with the notion that the OPHN1 VUS is the underlying cause of disease. For instance, both affected brothers display macrocephaly, which has not been previously attributed to mutations in OPHN1. Moreover, the lack of the key clinical finding of cerebellar hypoplasia in the affected brothers, as well as the absence of the usual carrier phenotype in the mother makes OPHN1 an unlikely molecular candidate for disease. We therefore determined that the MTOR alteration c.5395G>A (p.E1799K), which is carried by both affected brothers but absent in the mother (Table 3), displayed sufficient clinical overlap with the proband’s phenotype to warrant further investigation/confirmation.
Table 3

Family trio DES identifies the MTOR alteration p.E1799K (c.5395G>A) in the proband and affected brother

Nucleotidesa

Proband

Brother

Mother

Reference

C

53.23% (33/62)

52.63% (20/38)

100.00% (31/31)

Mutation

T

46.77% (29/62)

47.37% (18/38)

0.00% (0/31)

Q Score

220

148

119

aThe variant is notated as C>T by the alignment software because the MTOR gene is situated on the minus strand of chromosome 1. For each trio member, the percentage of reads is followed in brackets by the fraction of wt or variant reads over the total number of reads

Sanger sequencing confirms that p.E1799K co-segregates with disease in the family

As indicated by the red arrows shown in the lower two chromatograms of Fig. 2b, automated fluorescent dideoxy sequencing of gDNA extracted from family member blood samples confirmed the presence of the MTOR alteration c.5395G>A (p.E1799K) in the proband and his affected brother. In contrast, c.5395G>A (p.E1799K) was not detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) gDNA of either parent (Fig. 2b, upper chromatograms). Because the STR results are consistent with the reported familial relationships, these co-segregation data strongly suggest that the MTOR variant c.5395G>A (p.E1799K) originated as a consequence of gonadal mosaicism in one of the parents.

MTOR dysfunction is concordant with the patients' phenotype

Overstimulation of the MTOR signaling network, as well as hyperactivation of MTOR itself have been shown to cause symptoms that overlap those displayed by the proband and his brother, namely macrocephaly and ASD [711, 23]. In humans, MTOR is expressed in every tissue of the body and is highly expressed in brain, where it plays important roles in axonal and dendritic growth, as well as in synaptic plasticity [15]. It is understood that the PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling pathway plays a key role in mammalian growth and development via its ability to regulate protein translation (Fig. 1). Emerging evidence suggests that the MTOR axis regulates brain development by not simply acting as an ‘on/off’ switch that promotes beneficial protein synthesis, but rather by functioning as a valve that modulates translational rates during distinct temporal windows. Thus, if excessive protein synthesis occurs at the wrong time, it can result in significant deficits in synaptic plasticity and behavior [15].

Although there is ample evidence that other genes in the MTOR pathway, particularly PTEN, cause neurodevelopmental abnormalities including macrocephaly and autism, the first report of a pathogenic mutation in MTOR itself was a mosaic somatic mutation limited to the affected brain tissue of a child with hemimegalencephaly [19]. Subsequently, non-mosaic germline MTOR mutations were reported in two unrelated children with seizures and developmental delay, one of whom had documented megalencephaly and callosal dysgenesis [20, 21]. Recently, Baynam and colleagues reported three maternal half-siblings of Aboriginal Australian heritage who presented with megalencephaly, developmental delay, and epilepsy (Table 1). The affected individuals, who are unrelated to the family in this report, share the same germline activating MTOR alteration as that harbored by the affected brothers described herein: p.E1799K (c.5395G>A) [22]. The authors showed that the alteration was not present in the blood of the clinically normal mother and, as in the case of our proband and his affected brother, p.E1799K (c.5395G>A) was postulated to have arisen due to parental gonadal mosaicism [22]. Assays performed on stimulated PBMCs from one of the affected half-sisters revealed that MTOR activity was upregulated in her cells; moreover, this increase in activity could be inhibited/rescued back to normal levels through treatment with Rapamycin [22].

Emerging evidence indicates that altered MTOR activity may be associated with allergic reactions that are capable of triggering neuropathology. Because PTEN is an inhibitor of the PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling cascade, loss-of-function (LOF) PTEN mutations result in increased MTOR activity, which in turn potentiates inflammation through 1 ) microglial and mast cell proliferation [38, 39], and 2 ) mast cell chemotaxis and activation [40, 41]. Theoharides et al. proposed a model in which children with hyperactivation of the MTOR pathway have a lower threshold for brain mast cell stimulation and are thus more sensitive to triggers like allergens, immune factors, neuro-hormones, stress and toxins [42]. In support of this model, the hormone Neurotensin (NT), which is secreted by the hypothalamus and functions as a stimulator of brain mast cells, is detected at increased levels in the serum of autistic children [43].

While the relationship between our patients’ colobomas and their MTOR mutation remains speculative, it is clear that the PI3K-AKT-MTOR pathway affects eye development. Most notably, Rieger anomaly is a cardinal feature of SHORT (Short Stature, Hyperextensibility, Hernia, Ocular Depression, Rieger Anomaly, and Teething Delay) syndrome, which is caused by heterozygous Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, Regulatory Subunit 1 (PIK3R1) mutations [44]. Cataracts are also an occasional feature of PTEN hamartoma syndrome [45].

The MTOR variant p.E1799K is a GOF pathogenic mutation

The alteration p.E1799K, which was originally identified in multiple somatic tumor samples, has been empirically shown to cause hyperactivation of MTOR [18]. Interestingly, in HEK293 cells, p.E1799K selectively increases MTOR kinase activity towards the substrates AKT/ Protein Kinase B (AKT) and 4E-Binding Protein 1 (4E-BP1), but exerts minimal effect on MTOR kinase activity towards ribosomal P70 S6 Kinase 1 (S6K1) [18]. As illustrated in Fig. 1, increased phosphorylation of 4E-PB1 and AKT by TORC1 and TORC2, respectively, triggers increased protein synthesis. Moreover, constitutive or heightened MTOR activation has the potential to decouple and/or alter the manner in which the PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling axis responds to neurotransmitters and external growth and development cues that exert their effects through neuronal cell surface receptor binding. Further support for the notion that increased MTOR activity is the mutational mechanism underlying neurological disease in the proband and his affected brother comes from the fact that homozygous LOF genotypes are tolerated in the healthy population [46].

As shown in Fig. 3a, p.E1799K is situated in the FAT (FRAP, ATM, TRRAP) domain of MTOR. This domain adopts a c-shaped α solenoid structure that clamps onto the kinase domain (KD) of the enzyme and serves to negatively regulate MTOR activity [36]. Utilizing the MTOR crystal structure as a basis [36], we interpreted the mechanism by which p.E1799K leads to the hyperactivation of MTOR kinase. Glutamic acid 1799 (E1799), which is spatially positioned at the MTOR FAT-kinase domain interface, is directed towards Arginine 2505 (R2505), which is situated on the kinase side of this boundary (Fig. 3c). Due to their proximity, E1799 and R2505 likely interact through local electrostatic forces (<8 Å E1799 Oε2 – R2505 Nε), and this interaction contributes to the stringent repression of MTOR kinase activity by the FAT domain. We propose that the substitution of lysine for glutamic acid (Fig. 3c, white and magenta sticks, respectively), disrupts this electrostatic interaction and thereby destabilizes the local FAT-kinase environment to the point that the enzyme is shifted to a more active state. In fact, a mechanism similar to this has been shown to underlie the widely studied and structurally adjacent MTOR activating mutation, p.E2419K (Fig. 3c) [36, 47]. In this particular case, the substitution eliminates the E2419/R1905 salt bridge (not shown) that is normally present at the FAT-kinase interface. The loss of the salt bridge in turn reduces the negative regulation exerted by the FAT clamp on the KD, which results in increased kinase activity [36, 47]. Of therapeutic import is the fact that cancer derived cell lines and xenografts that carry the MTOR p.E1799K variant are hyper-responsive to Rapamycin treatment [18].
Fig. 3

E1799K is a pathogenic activating mutation. a) Location of p.E1799K in relation to the domain/ structural organization of MTOR. Structural elements shown are the two groups of HEAT (Huntington Elongation Factor 3, A Subunit of PP2A TOR1) repeats; the FAT (FKBP12-Rapamycin-Associated Protein/TOR, Ataxia-Telangiectasia, Transactivation/ Transformation Domain-Associated Protein) domain; the FRB (FKBP12-Rapamycin Binding) domain; the KIN (Kinase) domain; and the terminal FATC (FAT C-Terminal) domain. b) The conservation plot reveals that E1799 (black rectangle) is evolutionarily conserved across vertebrates, which suggests that this amino acid plays an essential role for the normal function of MTOR kinase. c) A 3D schematic of the local environment surrounding the FAT-kinase domain interface that illustrates the mechanism by which p.E1799K causes hyperactivation of MTOR kinase. The FAT domain is represented in green while the kinase domain is peach-colored. Highlighted residues include E1799 (magenta stick), K1799 (white stick) and the activating residues described in the text: E2419, R1905 and R2505 (represented as sticks colored according to the domain in which they reside)

In support of the notion that MTOR p.E1799K is a pathogenic mutation that causes neurological disease in humans, Ghahramani and colleagues recently reported the same MTOR activating variant, p.E1799K, in an unrelated proband who displayed major clinical symptoms that were almost identical to those of the brothers’ in our report: macrocephaly and intellectual disability. Ghahramani’s group demonstrated that the p.E1799K mutation in their proband originated as a de novo germline event [23].

Additional evidence for the pathogenicity of MTOR p.E1799K comes from the fact that this variant is not present in the healthy human population. For instance, the following databases of human genetic variation make no reference of healthy individuals who harbor MTOR p.E1799K: the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), dbSNP, the 1000 Genomes database, and the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) [29, 46, 48].

A number of independent clinical studies have documented patients who harbor causative MTOR missense variants and who present neurological and developmental symptoms that overlap those of the affected brothers in our study. For example, in a 2012 report, Lee et al. detailed a 5 year-old boy who suffered from seizures and whose brain displayed hemimegalencephaly (HME). Following lateral hemispherectomy, whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on the patient’s excised brain tissue, as well as on his PBMCs. WES revealed that the proband harbored the somatic MTOR alteration p.C1483Y in his affected brain regions, but neither in his unaffected brain areas nor his PBMCs. Moreover, immunostaining revealed that the alteration in question resulted in hyperactivation of MTOR signaling. Since surgery, the patient has remained symptom-free. These results strongly suggest that the MTOR alteration p.C1483Y caused the patient’s symptoms [19]. Interestingly, a de novo germline MTOR alteration at the same position, p.C1483F, was identified in a 17-month old girl who displayed megalencephaly and intractable seizures [49]. These data are highly suggestive that cysteine 1483 plays an essential role for the maintenance of normal MTOR activity; moreover, substitution of p.C1483 for either isoleucine or phenylalanine potentiates the development of neurological disease in humans.

Other germline MTOR alterations have been reported in patients with epilepsy. For example, the de novo MTOR missense variant p.M1595I was detected in a non-verbal 18 month-old male proband who displayed infantile spasms, myoclonic seizures, and global developmental delay. Although no functional assays were undertaken in this case, multiple in silico models predicted the variant to be deleterious to normal protein function [20].

Because MTOR p.E1799K has been documented to be associated with overlapping neurological and developmental symptoms in independent families, and because it has been empirically demonstrated to cause hyperactivation of MTOR kinase, we propose that this variant is a pathogenic mutation that has the capacity to cause megalencephaly and neurological dysfunction in humans.

Conclusions

Herein, we demonstrate that the MTOR missense variant p.E1799K is a pathogenic mutation that results in hyperactivation of MTOR kinase activity and causes megalencephaly/ macrocephaly and neurological impairment in humans. We demonstrate that p.E1799K exerts its effects on the developing brain by A ) causing increased protein synthesis that is either exaggerated or decoupled from normal development cues during key temporal windows, and by B ) potentially causing inflammation/ allergic reactions in the brain that could potentiate the development of focal lesions. It is of interest that both affected brothers in this study suffer from allergies. Finally, we suggest that because cells which carry the MTOR p.E1799K mutation are hyper-responsive to Rapamycin, treatment with this drug during post-natal development may prove beneficial in alleviating the craniofacial and neurological symptoms that develop in children who harbor hyper-activating MTOR mutations. Pre-clinical and clinical trials will be necessary to bear out this notion.

Consent

The family described in this report has provided us with their written consent to have their clinical histories and photographs published.

Abbreviations

4E-BP1 AKT: 

Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein 1 AKT/ Protein Kinase B

ASD: 

Autism Spectrum Disorder

AVA: 

Ambry Variant Analyzer

CGH: 

Comparative Genomic Hybridization

dbSNP: 

Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

DES: 

Diagnostic Exome Sequencing

ESP: 

Exome Sequencing Project

ExAC: 

Exome Aggregation Consortium

FAT: 

FKBP12-Rapamycin-Associated Protein/ TOR, Ataxia-Telangiectasia, Transactivation/ Transformation Domain-Associated Protein

FATC: 

FAT C-Terminal

FCM: 

Focal Cortical Malformation

FRB: 

FKBP12-Rapamycin Binding

gDNA: 

Genomic DNA

GOF: 

Gain-of-Function

GRCh37: 

Genome Reference Consortium Human Genome Build 37

HEAT: 

Huntington Elongation Factor 3, A Subunit of PP2A TOR1

HGMD 2011.3: 

Human Gene Mutation Database Professional 2011.3

ID: 

Intellectual Disability

KD: 

Kinase Domain

KIN: 

Kinase Domain

LOF: 

Loss-of-Function

MTOR: 

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin

NGS: 

Next Generation Sequencing

NT: 

Neurotensin

OMIM: 

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

OPHN1: 

Oligophrenin-1

PBMC: 

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell

PI3K: 

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase

PIK3R1: 

Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, Regulatory Subunit 1

PTEN: 

Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue

RAS: 

Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog

S6: 

Ribosomal P70 S6

S6K: 

Ribosomal P70 S6 Kinase

SHORT: 

Short Stature, Hyperextensibility, Hernia, Ocular Depression, Rieger Anomaly, and Teething Delay

SNP: 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

STR: 

Short Tandem Repeat

TORC1: 

MTOR Complex 1

TORC2: 

MTOR Complex 2

TSC: 

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

UTR: 

Untranslated Region

VUS: 

Variant of Uncertain Significance

WES: 

Whole Exome Sequencing

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the patients and family members for giving us permission to publish their clinical data in this report.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ambry Genetics Corporation
(2)
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Folstein SE, Rosen-Sheidley B. Genetics of autism: complex aetiology for a heterogeneous disorder. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2(12):943–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smalley SL, Asarnow RF, Spence MA. Autism and genetics. A decade of research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(10):953–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Talebizadeh Z, Bittel DC, Miles JH, Takahashi N, Wang CH, Kibiryeva N, et al. No association between HOXA1 and HOXB1 genes and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). J Med Genet. 2002;39(11):e70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yonan AL, Alarcon M, Cheng R, Magnusson PK, Spence SJ, Palmer AA, et al. A genomewide screen of 345 families for autism-susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(4):886–97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fombonne E, Roge B, Claverie J, Courty S, Fremolle J. Microcephaly and macrocephaly in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999;29(2):113–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eng C. Will the real Cowden syndrome please stand up: revised diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet. 2000;37(11):828–30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanssen AM, Fryns JP. Cowden syndrome. J Med Genet. 1995;32(2):117–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Reardon W, Zhou XP, Eng C. A novel germline mutation of the PTEN gene in a patient with macrocephaly, ventricular dilatation, and features of VATER association. J Med Genet. 2001;38(12):820–3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goffin A, Hoefsloot LH, Bosgoed E, Swillen A, Fryns JP. PTEN mutation in a family with Cowden syndrome and autism. Am J Med Genet. 2001;105(6):521–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zori RT, Marsh DJ, Graham GE, Marliss EB, Eng C. Germline PTEN mutation in a family with Cowden syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1998;80(4):399–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schaefer GB, Mendelsohn NJ, Professional P, Guidelines C. Clinical genetics evaluation in identifying the etiology of autism spectrum disorders: 2013 guideline revisions. Genet Med. 2013;15(5):399–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore PA, Rosen CA, Carter KC. Assignment of the human FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein (FRAP) gene to chromosome 1p36 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics. 1996;33(2):331–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004;18(16):1926–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoeffer CA, Klann E. mTOR signaling: at the crossroads of plasticity, memory and disease. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(2):67–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crino PB. Focal brain malformations: a spectrum of disorders along the mTOR cascade. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;288:260–72. discussion 272–281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong M, Crino PB: mTOR and Epileptogenesis in Developmental Brain Malformations. In: Jasper’s Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies, Fourth Edition. Edited by Noebels JL, Avoli M, Rogawski MA, Olsen RW, Delgado-Escueta AV, 4th edn. Bethesda (MD); 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Grabiner BC, Nardi V, Birsoy K, Possemato R, Shen K, Sinha S, et al. A diverse array of cancer-associated MTOR mutations are hyperactivating and can predict rapamycin sensitivity. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(5):554–63.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JH, Huynh M, Silhavy JL, Kim S, Dixon-Salazar T, Heiberg A, et al. De novo somatic mutations in components of the PI3K-AKT3-mTOR pathway cause hemimegalencephaly. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):941–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Epi KC, Epilepsy Phenome/Genome P, Allen AS, Berkovic SF, Cossette P, Delanty N, Dlugos D, et al. De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies. Nature. 2013;501(7466):217–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Soden S, Saunders CJ, Willig LK, FArrow EG, Smith LD, Petrikin JE, et al. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(265):265ra168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baynam G, Overkov A, Davis M, Mina K, Schofield L, Allcock R, et al. A germline MTOR mutation in Aboriginal Australian siblings with intellectual disability, dysmorphism, macrocephaly, and small thoraces. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167(7):1659–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghahramani N, Klein S, Ghahremani S, Lee H, Strom S, Deignan J, et al. Activating Mutations in mTOR Cause Human Overgrowth Associated with Macrocephaly, Intellectual Disability, and Distinct Dysmorphic Features. In: ACMG Annual Clinical Genetics Meeting. Salt Lake City: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, Rogov P, LeProust EM, Brockman W, et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(2):182–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bainbridge MN, Wang M, Burgess DL, Kovar C, Rodesch MJ, D'Ascenzo M, Kitzman J, Wu YQ, Newsham I, Richmond TA, et al. Whole exome capture in solution with 3 Gbp of data. Genome Biol. 11(6):R62. http://www.genomebiology.com.
  26. Farwell KD, Shahmirzadi L, El-Khechen D, Powis Z, Chao EC, Tippin Davis B, Baxter RM, Zeng W, Mroske C, Parra MC et al.: Enhanced utility of family-centered diagnostic exome sequencing with inheritance model–based analysis: results from 500 unselected families with undiagnosed genetic conditions. Genet Med 2014:1–9Google Scholar
  27. Ye K, Schulz MH, Long Q, Apweiler R, Ning Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(21):2865–71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Howells K, Phillips AD, Thomas NS, et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med. 2009;1(1):13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(1):308–11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 1000 Genomes Project C. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1061–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. International HapMap C. The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426(6968):789–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(1):24–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsai MF, Lin YJ, Cheng YC, Lee KH, Huang CC, Chen YT, et al. PrimerZ: streamlined primer design for promoters, exons and human SNPs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W63–65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang H, Rudge DG, Koos JD, Vaidialingam B, Yang HJ, Pavletich NP. mTOR kinase structure, mechanism and regulation. Nature. 2013;497(7448):217–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Al-Owain M, Kaya N, Al-Zaidan H, Al-Hashmi N, Al-Bakheet A, Al-Muhaizea M, et al. Novel intragenic deletion in OPHN1 in a family causing XLMR with cerebellar hypoplasia and distinctive facial appearance. Clin Genet. 2011;79(4):363–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shang YC, Chong ZZ, Wang S, Maiese K. Erythropoietin and Wnt1 govern pathways of mTOR, Apaf-1, and XIAP in inflammatory microglia. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2011;8(4):270–85.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Smrz D, Kim MS, Zhang S, Mock BA, Smrzova S, DuBois W, et al. mTORC1 and mTORC2 differentially regulate homeostasis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic human mast cells. Blood. 2011;118(26):6803–13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Halova I, Draberova L, Draber P. Mast cell chemotaxis - chemoattractants and signaling pathways. Frontiers Immunology. 2012;3:119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim MS, Kuehn HS, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. Activation and function of the mTORC1 pathway in mast cells. J Immunol. 2008;180(7):4586–95.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Theoharides TC. Is a subtype of autism an allergy of the brain? Clin Ther. 2013;35(5):584–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Angelidou A, Francis K, Vasiadi M, Alysandratos KD, Zhang B, Theoharides A, et al. Neurotensin is increased in serum of young children with autistic disorder. J Neuroinflammation. 2010;7:48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dyment DA, Smith AC, Alcantara D, Schwartzentruber JA, Basel-Vanagaite L, Curry CJ, et al. Mutations in PIK3R1 cause SHORT syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93(1):158–66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sellitto C, Li L, Gao J, Robinson ML, Lin RZ, Mathias RT, et al. AKT activation promotes PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome-associated cataract development. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5401–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP). Exome Variant Server. (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) Accessed Sep, 2015.
  47. Ohne Y, Takahara T, Hatakeyama R, Matsuzaki T, Noda M, Mizushima N, et al. Isolation of hyperactive mutants of mammalian target of rapamycin. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(46):31861–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA. (http://exac.broadinstitute.org) Accessed Sep, 2015.
  49. Smith LD, Saunders CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Atherton AM, Miller NA, Soden SE, et al. Exome Sequencing Reveals De Novo Germline Mutation of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (MTOR) in a Patient with Megalencephaly and Intractable Seizures. J Genomes Exomes. 2013;2:63–72.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Mroske et al. 2015

Advertisement