Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

CYP1B1 mutations in patients with primary congenital glaucoma from Saudi Arabia

  • Osama M Badeeb1Email author,
  • Shazia Micheal2,
  • Robert K Koenekoop3,
  • Anneke I den Hollander2 and
  • Manal T Hedrawi4
BMC Medical Genetics201415:109

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-014-0109-2

Received: 3 February 2014

Accepted: 24 September 2014

Published: 28 September 2014

Abstract

Background

CYP1B1 is the most commonly mutated gene in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). This study was undertaken to identify mutations in CYP1B1 in the Western region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Blood of patients who had typical findings of PCG, were screened by direct sequencing of all coding exons and splice junctions of the CYP1B1 gene.

Results

34 patients were studied; 18 patients belonged to 8 families, and 16 patients were non-familial, isolated PCG. Consanguinity was found in 27/34 (79.4%) of cases. All patients were diagnosed to have bilateral PCG at birth except one child, who had glaucoma in the right eye. More males (61.8%) were affected than females (38.2%). 79.4% (27/34) of patients were solved with pathogenic mutations and 20.6% (7/34) remained unsolved. Of the solved ones, 22.2% (6/27) of patients carry a pathogenic allele on one allele while the other allele remained yet to be determined. Direct sequencing of exon 2 revealed two pathogenic variants (p.Gly61Glu, p.Glu229Lys). P.Gly61Glu substitution was found both homozygously in 63% (17/27) of cases, and heterozygously in one patient. P.Glu229Lys variant was found heterozygous in 3.7% (1/27) of cases. One pathogenic variant (p.Arg469Trp) was found in exon 3, and is present homozygously in 14.8% (4/27) of cases while four patients have this variant heterozygously. All mutations were reported previously in the Saudi population, except p.Glu229Lys. Severe cases were associated with p.Gly61Glu, and p.Arg469Trp in 50% and 30% of ten patients respectively.

Conclusions

This study confirms that CYP1B1 mutations are the most frequent cause of PCG in the Saudi population, with p.Gly61Glu being the major disease-associated mutation. P.Glu229Lys is a newly discovered mutation in our PCG patients. Patient lacking mutation in CYP1B1 gene seems likely, to have another genetic loci involved in the pathogenesis of the disease, and need further study. Genetic studies of recessive diseases such as PCG is important in consanguineous populations, since it will increase awareness and allows genetic counseling to be offered to patients and their relatives. This will not only reduce the disease to be inherited to future generations, but will also reduce the disease burden in the community.

Keywords

CongenitalGlaucomaGeneMutationCYP1B1

Background

Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) refers to a glaucoma occurring within the first 3 years of life, due to isolated trabeculodysgenesis [1]. It is relatively common in Saudi Arabia (SA), with an estimated incidence of 1: 2500 live births, secondary to a high prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi families [2]. It is the second most common cause of blindness in schools of the blind in SA [3]. The congenital glaucoma registry at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital showed that PCG geographic distributions in SA is: south region (27.8%), western province (23.6%), central region (22.2%), eastern province (11.1%), and north province (9%) [4].

The link between PCG and gene abnormalities is the initial step in the establishment of the pathophysiology of the disease. Three previous major studies [5]-[7] were conducted in SA, to identify the abnormal genes associated with PCG. So far CYP1B1 was the only gene found to be associated with bilateral PCG in consanguineous Saudi Arabian families. CYP1B1 mutations were identified in 96% of cases of the study described by Bejjani et al. [6] and in 75.9% of cases of the study described by Abu-Amero et al. [7]. Unilateral PCG were studied by Khan et al. [8] but was not associated with CYP1B1 mutations. Expatriates were excluded from all previous gene studies [4]-[8].

This study was conducted to identify CYP1B1 mutations in Saudi PCG patients with various ethnic backgrounds, and to identify those patients who carry novel mutations. Patients were collected at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, one of the major hospitals in the Western province of Saudi Arabia and a main referral centre for congenital glaucoma in the province.

Methods

Patients and clinical data

The study adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by King Abdulaziz University Research ethics committee (Reference No. 922–12).

After signed informed consents were obtained, blood samples were collected for DNA isolation from 34 patients with PCG.

Patients were recruited from the glaucoma clinic at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) and the pediatric ophthalmology clinic at King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (KFAFH), in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The diagnosis of PCG was established by the following signs: (1) increased intraocular pressure (IOP) (>21 mmHg), (2) cornea diameter (>10 mm) and changes (oedema, Haab's striae, scar), (3) optic nerve glaucomatous cupping, and by the following symptoms: photophobia, epiphora, and/or blephrospasm [1]. The medical history of all participants was taken and the family pedigrees were drawn. Patients with other ocular and systemic abnormalities were excluded.

Molecular genetic analysis

Primers were designed for the two coding exons and splice site junctions of the CYP1B1 gene using Primer 3 (primer sequences and PCR conditions are available on request). PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel and purified with PCR clean-up purification plates (NucleoFast® 96 PCR, MACHEREY-NAGEL, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Purified PCR products were analyzed by Sanger sequencing in both directions using both forward and reverse primers in an automated DNA sequencer (Big Dye Terminator, version 3 on a 3730 DNA analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequencing results were aligned with the reference sequence (obtained from the hg19 human genome build) and analyzed using Vector NTI Advance (TM) 2011 software (Invitrogen). In addition, the pathogenicity of CYP1B1 missense variants was evaluated by publically available in silico tools including PhyloP, Grantham, PolyPhen2, and SIFT.

Data collection and statistical analysis

Data were collected from the medical records in a special form and then entered and stored in computer Microsoft ward. Graph Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, Ca USA) was used to analyze the data. Frequency distribution tables were used to present the data. Mean, standard deviation and (student's) t-test were used to compare continuous variables.

All tests were two sided and at a 5% level of statistical significance. Fisher's exact test also used to compare the real values of native and non-native Saudi groups.

Results

Demographic and medical data

Our study included 34 PCG patients: 23 patients from KAUH and 11 patients from KFAFH. 18 patients belonged to 8 families with consanguineous parents, while9 patients were unrelated, non-familial, isolated PCG cases belonging to consanguineous parents. 7 patients were unrelated, non-familial, isolated PCG belonging to non-consanguineous parents. Consanguinity was reported in 27/34 (79.4%) of cases.

All 34 patients were diagnosed to have bilateral PCG at birth except one child, who had glaucoma only in the right eye. More males (21/34) were affected than females (13/34). At presentation, the mean IOP +/- standard deviation (SD) was 30.48+/−6.93 (range 20 – 47) mmHg, the mean corneal diameter +/− SD was 12.71 +/−1.26 (range 10 – 17) mm. The mean cupping +/− SD and mean refraction +/− SD of 23 eyes with clear cornea was 0.47 +/− 0.29 (range 0.1 - 1.0), and - 4.92 +/− 5 (range +2.3 to −16) D respectively.

Twenty three cases were native Saudi, of which 21 (91%) were positive for CYP1B1 mutations, and 2 (9%) were negative. Eleven patients were non-native Saudi, originating from Yemen (4), Sudan (3), Afghanistan (2), Burma (1), and Syria (1). Of the non-native cases, 6 (54.5%) were positive for CYP1B1 mutations, and 5 (45.5%) were negative. Overall 27/34 (79.4%) cases carried CYP1B1 mutations and 20.6% (7/34) patients remained unsolved. Table 1, present a comparison of demographic, medical and CYP1B1 mutations between native and non-native Saudis. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups, except for the mean C/D ratio, which was higher in the non-native Saudi group.
Table 1

Comparison of demographic data and CYP1B1 mutations between native and non-native Saudi patients

 

No. of patients

Gender (%)

Affected eyes

Cons (%)

Mean IOP (+/−SD) mmHg

Mean corneal diameter (+/−SD) mm

Mean C/D (+/−SD)

Mutation (%)

M

F

R

L

R

L

R

L

R

L

Native Saudi

23

14 (60.7)

9 (39.1)

23

23

21 (91.3)

29.2 (4.9)

30.9 (6.9)

12.5 (1.3)

12.7 (1.6)

0.3 (0.3)

0.4 (0.3)

21(91)

Non-native Saudi

11

7 (63.6)

4 (36.4)

11

10

6 (54.6)

31.7 (9.07)

31.3 (9.04)

12.8 (0.7)

12.8 (0.9)

0.7 (0.2)

0.7 (0.3)

6 (54.5)

P Value

 

*1

*1

*1

*1

*0.4

**.302

**.887

**.481

**.849

**.0005

**.0153

**0.4

M-Male, F-Female, R-Right eye, L-Left eye, IOP-Intraocular pressure, C/D-Cup to Disc ratio, Cons = consanguinity, *Fisher's exact test, **t-student test.

Ten patients were classified to have severe glaucoma on presentation (based on IOP level, corneal diameter and clarity) according to Al-Hazmi et al. [9] classification. 5 (50%) patients were associated with G61E, and 3 (30%) patients with R469W mutations Table 2.
Table 2

Correlation between CYP1B1 mutations and Severity of PCG in native (23) and non-native (11) Saudi

 

Severity

Mild

Moderate

Severe

None

G61E

R469W

E229K

None

G61E

R469W

E229K

None

G61E

R469W

E229K

No. of Native Saudi (%)

1 (4.4)

6 (26.1)

2 (8.7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

5 (21.7)

2 (8.7)

0 (0)

1 (4.4)

4 (17.4)

2 (8.7)

0 (0)

No. of Non-Native Saudi (%)

2 (18.2)

1 (9.1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (19.2)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

0 (0)

Total (%)

3 (8.8)

7 (20.6)

2 (5.9)

0 (0)

2 (5.9)

6 (17.7)

3 (8.8)

1 (2.9)

2 (5.9)

5 (15.8)

3 (8.8)

0 (0)

[9] Mild: (IOP < 25 mmHg, Corneal diameter < 13 mm, Clear cornea).

Moderate: (IOP = 25-35 mmHg, corneal diameter = 13-14.5 mm, hazy cornea).

Severe: (IOP > 35 mmHg, corneal diameter > 14.5 mm, cloudy cornea).

CYP1B1 mutation analysis

DNA samples of all patients were screened for mutations in the CYP1B1 gene. Pathogenic variants were detected in CYP1B1 gene in 27 patients. 77.8% (21/27) patients were completely solved with pathogenic mutations, while 22.2% (6/27) patients were carrying a pathogenic allele on one allele while the other allele remained yet to be known. Direct sequencing of exon 2 revealed two pathogenic variants (c.182G > A: p.Gly61Glu, and c.685G > A: p.Glu229Lys). The p.Gly61Glu substitution was found homozygously in 63% (17/27) patients, of which 10 cases belong to 4 consanguineous families. The p.Glu229Lys variant was found heterozygously in 3.7% (1/27) of cases Table 3.
Table 3

Mutations detected in CYP1B1 in PCG patients from Saudi Arabia

Nucleotide change

Amino-acid change

Patient heterozygous

Patient homozygous

Families

PhyloP

Grantham distance

SIFT score*

PolyPhen**

dbSNP

c.-1-12C > T

N/A

2

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

rs2617266

c.142C > G

p.Arg48Gly

2

2

N/A

−1.25

125

0.38

0.00

rs10012

c.355G > T

p.Ala119Ser

3

3

N/A

−0.28

99

0.79

0.00

rs1056827

c.729G > C

p.Val243Val

1

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

rs9341249

c.1328C > G

p.Ala443Gly

1

0

N/A

0.85

60

0.19

0.00

rs4986888

c.1347T > C

p.Asp449Asp

5

3

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

rs1056837

c.182G > A

p.Gly61Glu

1

17

4

3.34

98

0.0

1.00

rs28936700

c.685G > A

p.Glu229Lys

1

0

N/A

3.6

56

0.03

0.99

Rs57865060

c.1405C > T

p.Arg469Trp

4

4

3

1.09

101

0.0

1.0

Rs28936701

[5]-[7],[10]-[19] *Substitutions with a SIFT score <0.05 are predicted to be deleterious, **Polyphen scores near 1 are confidently predicted to be pathogenic. N/A = Not Applicable.

Similarly, one pathogenic variant (c.1405C > T: p.Arg469Trp) was detected in exon 3. The p.Arg469Trp was found in 29.6% (8/27) patients. The p.Arg469Trp substitution was found homozygously in four patients belonging to two consanguineous families.

The probable pathogenic mutations of the 22.2% (6/27) patients were, p.Arg469Trp in four patients, p.Gly61Glu in one patient and p.Glu229Lys in one patient, heterozygously. These six patients might have a second variant in the same gene that lies in the noncoding region i.e. intron or promoter Table 3.

In addition to those pathogenic variants, 6 other common SNPs (rs2617266, rs10012, rs1056827, rs9341249, rs4986888 and rs1056837) were also found either homozygously and heterozygously, that were not predicted to be pathogenic Table 3.

Discussion

The populations of the Arabian Peninsula descend from a small number of founders. Their descendants established various tribes that dispersed across the kingdom. Therefore, the majority of native Saudi Arabians living today have common ancestors [5]. This is may be true in all parts of SA except the Western region, where the population consists of a different ethnic groups due to the presence of the two holy cities, Makkah and Madinah, and immigration of people from Arabic and Islamic countries to this region over the last 14 centuries. Jeddah is the sea port of the two holy cities, and thus also has a population with a high cultural and ethnical diversity. Non-native Saudi PCG patients were excluded from all previously published gene studies, and only conducted on native patients from various tribes and regions of SA [4]-[8]. To the best of our knowledge this is the only gene study in SA, which addresses the effect of ethnicity on gene anomalies in PCG.

The CYP1B1 gene was selected to screen for mutations in our PCG patients, since it was considered the main candidate gene for PCG in Saudi Arabia. CYP1B1 mutations were found in 79.4% of our patients, which is higher than that reported by Abu-Amero et al. [7] and lower than that reported by Bejjani et al. [6].

We detected CYP1B1 mutations in 91% and 54.5% of native and non-native Saudi Arabian PCG patients, respectively. This difference in rate of mutations could be secondary to the lower consanguinity rate in the non-native Saudi population (54.6%) compared to the native population (91.3%). The rate of CYP1B1 mutations in our non-native Saudi cases is low and comparable to populations with low consanguinity rates like India (44%) [10] and Brazil (50%) [11]. In addition, the high rate of CYP1B1 mutations in the native Saudi PCG cases may be explained by the population structure. Since the native Saudi population descended from a limited number of founders, it is likely that one of a small number of founder mutations have arisen that explain the majority of the cases among the native Saudi populations. Two of the pathogenic variants (p.Gly61Glu, p.Arg469Trp) identified in our cases were previously reported in the literature in PCG patients of various populations (ethnic groups), including native Saudi Arabians [5]-[7]. The Gly61Glu mutation is the most frequent mutation in the Saudi patients of our current study as well as in patients from Kuwait. Both SA and Kuwait share a common genetic background because of the neighborhood and frequent migration routes between the two populations [12]. We identified a missense mutation (p.Glu229Lys) in one of our non-native Saudi PCG patients. This patient's family is originally from Burma. This mutation has not been reported previously in native Saudi Arabian PCG patients [5]-[7], but it has been reported in Turkish [13], Indian [10], Iranian [14] patients, and in an index patient of family from Oman in heterozygous manner [15].

In a previous study of CYP1B1 analysis by Bejjani et al. [6] in PCG patients from SA a haplotype was constructed for the six SNPs. We also constructed haplotypes ie C/C/G/G/T/A using the same SNPs which includes one intronic c.-1-12C > T and five exonic SNPs i.e. c.142C > G; R48G, c.355G > T; A119S, c.1294C > G; V432L, c.1347T > C; D449D and c.1358A > G; N453S. In their study they had observed that this distinctive haplotype is associated with the five different mutations and we also saw a same haplotype C/G/G/T/A in case of the two mutations Gly61Glu and Arg469Trp in 27 patients. This same haplotype C/C/G/G/T/A was associated with at least seven separate mutations and appears to be common in all the individuals carrying the most frequent mutation, 4340delG in CYP1B1 in Brazilian PCG patients [11],[16]. However in the 7 patients which remained unsolved with CYP1B1 in the current study, 4 patients had this haplotype T/G/T/C/C/A while three individuals were heterozygous for all these five SNPs. Bejjani et al. [6] also found that the three families unsolved with CYP1B1 mutations has a heterozygous haplotype for these five SNPs. It seems likely, that individuals lacking haplotype C/C/G/G/T/A have another genetic loci involved in the pathogenesis of PCG. We are currently exploring this possibility.

In the literature, there has not been a consistent correlation between the severity of PCG and presence and types of CYP1B1 mutations [17]. Hollander et al. [18] found a correlation between the type of CYP1B1 mutations and the severity of glaucoma on the basis of anterior chamber angle histological changes and difficulty in controlling IOP. Panicker et al. [19] found that severe cases (using severity index) of PCG associated with ins376A (100%), E229K (80%), E368H (72%), G61E (66.7%), and P193L (62.5%). The severity of PCG in our patients was assessed on the basis of clinical assessment of IOP level, corneal diameter, and corneal clarity at the time of presentation. We did find severe cases of PCG associated with two mutations, G61E (50%), and R469W (30%), in ten of our patients.

Conclusions

This study confirms that CYP1B1 mutations are the most frequent cause of PCG in the Saudi Arabian population, with p.Gly61Glu being the major disease-associated allele. The p.Glu229Lys is a new mutation in Saudi Arabian PCG patients. Genetic studies of recessive diseases such as PCG is important in consanguineous populations, since it will increase awareness and allows genetic counseling to be offered to patients and their relatives. This will not only reduce the disease to be inherited to future generations, but will also reduce the disease burden in the community.

Authors' contributions

OB is the principal investigator of this research project. He wrote the proposal and obtained the grant from King Abdulaziz University. He enrolled patients in the study at King Abdulaziz university hospital. He analyzed the clinical data and wrote the manuscript. SM and AH carried the Gene studies at the Human Genetic lab at Radboud University Medical Centre. They analyzed and wrote the gene results and revised the manuscript. RK assisted in writing the proposal, analyzed the results, and revising the manuscript. MH enrolled patients in the study from King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This research project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, under Grant No. (575/140/1433). The authors, therefore acknowledge with thanks DSR for supporting this scientific research. We thank all the patients and families for their enthusiastic involvement.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Glaucoma unit, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University
(2)
Departments of Ophthalmology and Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center
(3)
McGill Ocular Genetics Laboratory, Pediatric Ophthalmology unit, McGill University Health Center
(4)
Pediatric Ophthalmology unit, King Fahd armed forces hospital

References

  1. Badeeb OB: Congenital Glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. 2011, King Abdulaziz University press, JeddahGoogle Scholar
  2. Jaafar M: Care of the infantile glaucoma patients. 1988, Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Rajhi A, Awad A, Badeeb O, Bukhari A, Al-Qahtani S, Mulla I, Jabak M, Selleck C: Causes of blindness in students attending school for the blind in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2003, 17: 276-280.Google Scholar
  4. Alanazi FF, Song JC, Mousa A, Morales J, Alshahwan S, Aldohayb S, Aljadaan I, Al-Turkmani S, Edward DP: Primary and secondary congenital glaucoma: baseline features from a registry at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013, 155: 882-889. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bejjani BA, Lewis RA, Tomey KF, Anderson KL, Dueker DK, Jabak M, Astle WF, Otterud B, Leppert M, Lupski JR: Mutations in CYP1B1, the gene for cytochrome P4501B1, are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 325-333. 10.1086/301725.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bejjani BA, Stockton DW, Lewis RA, Tomey KF, Dueker DK, Jabak M, Astle WF, Lupski JR: Multiple CYP1B1 mutations and incomplete penetrance in an inbred population segregating primary congenital glaucoma suggest frequent de novo events and a dominant modifier locus. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9: 367-374. 10.1093/hmg/9.3.367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Abu-Amero KK, Osman EA, Mousa A, Wheeler J, Whigham B, Allingham RR, Hauser MA, Al-Obeidan SA: Screening of CYP1B1 and LTBP2 genes in Saudi families with primary congenital glaucoma: genotype-phenotype correlation. Mol Vis. 2011, 17: 2911-2919.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Mohamed JY, Hijazi H, Alkuraya FS: CYP1B1 analysis of unilateral primary newborn glaucoma in Saudi children. J AAPOS. 2012, 16: 571-572. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Hazmi A, Awad A, Zawaan Z, Al-Mesfer SA, Al-Jadaan I, Al-Mohammed A: Correlation between surgical success rate and severity of congenital glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005, 89: 449-453. 10.1136/bjo.2004.047761.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Reddy AB, Kaur K, Mandal AK, Panicker SG, Thomas R, Hasnian SE, Balasubramanian D, Chakrabarti S: Mutation spectrum of the CYP1B1 gene in Indian primary congenital glaucoma patients. Mol Vis. 2004, 10: 696-702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stoilov IR, Costa VP, Vanscocellos JP, Melo MB, Betinjane AJ, Carani JC, Oltrogge EV, Safarazi M: Molecular genetics of primary congenital Glaucoma in Brazil. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002, 43: 1820-1827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Alfadhli S, Behbehani A, Elshafey A, Abdelmoaty S, Al-Awadi S: Molecular and clinical evaluation of primary congenital glaucoma in Kuwait. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006, 141: 512-515. 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bagiyeva S, Marfany G, Gonzalez-Angulo O, Gonzalez-Duarte R: Mutational screening of CYP1B1 in Turkish PCG families and functional analyses of newly detected mutations. Mol Vis. 2007, 13: 1458-1468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chitsazian F, Tusi BK, Elahi E, Saroei HA, Sanati MH, Yazdani S, Pakravan M, Nilforooshan N, Eslami Y, Mehrjerdi MA, Zareei R, Jabbarvand M, Abdolahi A, Lasheyee AR, Etemadi A, Bayat B, Sadeghi M, Banoei MM, Ghafarzadeh B, Rohani MR, Rismanchian A, Thorstenson Y, Sarfarazi M: CYP1B1 mutation profile of Iranian primary congenital glaucoma patients and associated haplotypes. J Mol Diagn. 2007, 9: 382-393. 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060157.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Gayar S, Ganesh A, Chavarria- Soley G, Al-Zuhaibi S, Al-Mjeni R, Raeburn S, Bialasiewicz AA: Molecular analysis of CYP1B1 in Omani patients with primary congenital glaucoma: a pilot study. Mol Vis. 2009, 15: 1325-1331.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Chavarria-Soley G, Rautenstrauss KM, Pasutto F, Flikier D, Flikier P, Cirak S, Bejjani B, Winters DL, Lewis RA, Mardin C, Reis A, Rautenstrauss B: Primary congenital glaucoma and Rieger's anomaly: extended haplotypes reveal founder effects for eight distinct CYP1B1 mutations. Mol Vis. 2006, 12: 523-531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur K, Mandal AK, Chakrabari S: Primary congenital glaucoma and the involvement of CYP1B1. MEAJO. 2011, 18: 7-16.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollander DA, Sarfarazi M, Stoilov I, Wood IS, Fredrick DR, Alvarado JA: Genotype and phenotype correlations in congenital glaucoma: CYP1B1 mutations, goniodysgenesis, and clinical characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006, 142: 993-1004. 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Panicker SG, Mandal AK, Reddy AB, Gothwal VK, Hasnain SE: Correlations of genotype with phenotype in India patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004, 45: 1149-1156. 10.1167/iovs.03-0404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Badeeb et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement