Skip to main content

Contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2sequence alterations to breast cancer in Northern India



A large number of distinct mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been reported worldwide, but little is known regarding the role of these inherited susceptibility genes in breast cancer risk among Indian women. We investigated the distribution and the nature of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations and polymorphisms in a cohort of 204 Indian breast cancer patients and 140 age-matched controls.


Cases were selected with regard to early onset disease (≤40 years) and family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Two hundred four breast cancer cases along with 140 age-matched controls were analyzed for mutations. All coding regions and exon-intron boundaries of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened by heteroduplex analysis followed by direct sequencing of detected variants.


In total, 18 genetic alterations were identified. Three deleterious frame-shift mutations (185delAG in exon 2; 4184del4 and 3596del4 in exon 11) were identified in BRCA1, along with one missense mutation (K1667R), one 5'UTR alteration (22C>G), three intronic variants (IVS10-12delG, IVS13+2T>C, IVS7+38T>C) and one silent substitution (5154C>T). Similarly three pathogenic protein-truncating mutations (6376insAA in exon 11, 8576insC in exon19, and 9999delA in exon 27) along with one missense mutation (A2951T), four intronic alterations (IVS2+90T>A, IVS7+75A>T, IVS8+56C>T, IVS25+58insG) and one silent substitution (1593A>G) were identified in BRCA2. Four previously reported polymorphisms (K1183R, S1613G, and M1652I in BRCA1, and 7470A>G in BRCA2) were detected in both controls and breast cancer patients. Rare BRCA1/2 sequence alterations were observed in 15 out of 105 (14.2%) early-onset cases without family history and 11.7% (4/34) breast cancer cases with family history. Of these, six were pathogenic protein truncating mutations. In addition, several variants of uncertain clinical significance were identified. Among these are two missense variants, one alteration of a consensus splice donor sequence, and a variant that potentially disrupts translational initiation.


BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations appear to account for a lower proportion of breast cancer patients at increased risk of harboring such mutations in Northern India (6/204, 2.9%) than has been reported in other populations. However, given the limited extent of reported family history among these patients, the observed mutation frequency is not dissimilar from that reported in other cohorts of early onset breast cancer patients. Several of the identified mutations are unique and novel to Indian patients.

Peer Review reports


Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy and primary cause of cancer death in women worldwide. It accounts for 23% of all cancers among women, and is the second most common cancer overall when both sexes are considered together. Despite substantial differences in age-standardized incidence rates between developed and developing countries (age standardised rates per 100,000 women (ASR) ranging from 99.4 to 16.5 in North America and Central Africa, respectively), differential survival in developed versus developing countries diminishes the range observed in corresponding mortality rates (ASR of 19.2 in North America vs. 12.1 in Central Africa). In all, breast cancer accounts for 14.1% of female cancer deaths. Most alarmingly, incidence rates have continued to increase worldwide, with an overall annual increase of approximately 0.5% since 1990. However, changes in incidence rates are greatest in developing countries, attaining annual increases of 3–4%. Should these trends continue, it is estimated that 1.5 million new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2010 [1].

In India, an average of 80,000 women are diagnosed with carcinoma of the breast, and 40,000 women die of the disease every year [2]. Although it is currently the second most common cancer among Indian women (19%) after cervical cancer (30%), in the urban cancer registries of Delhi and Mumbai, breast cancer has rapidly overtaken cervical cancer in frequency. The highest cancer incidence rate recorded among women at the Delhi Cancer Registry is breast cancer (ASR 30.5). These data not only demonstrate the magnitude of the current health problem associated with breast cancer in the Indian population, but also indicate that socio-economic trends will lead to rapid increases in its contribution to the overall health care burden.

Interestingly, although overall incidence of breast cancer in Indian population is low compared to Western populations (ASR of 23.5 vs. 90.7), the incidence of early onset disease (< 40 yrs) does not show significant geographic variation (ASR range worldwide of 12–33) [3] suggesting that in the Indian population a greater proportion of breast cancer is due to early onset disease compared to Western populations. According to the National Cancer Registry Project [NCRP] based on cancer registries at six hospitals, the average age of patients was found to range from 44.2 years (Dibrugarh) to 49.6 years (Bangalore and Chennai) [4]. Similarly, the average age of breast cancer patients in various population-based registries throughout India has been reported to be 50–53 years [5] whereas amongst US white females it is 61.0 years [6] showing that in Indian women, disease occurs a decade earlier than in Western populations.

Several environmental risk factors that may contribute to or hasten the development of breast cancer have been identified, including mainly lifestyle and reproductive factors. These may account for the majority of observed trends and the variation in incidence rates between developed and developing countries. The factor with the strongest breast cancer risk association is a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, the associated risk being even higher for family history of early onset disease (≤ age 40). The majority of familial breast cancer cases present at an early age relative to sporadic cancer, and genetic factors are considered to play major role in their development. Hence, the earlier average age of breast cancer among Indian women is intriguing, suggestive of a significant genetic component in this population.

Genetic susceptibility to cancer is triggered in several ways, the best understood causal mechanism being due to inactivating germline mutations in tumor suppressor and DNA repair genes, which lead to an accumulation of mutations in oncogenes and cell-cycle checkpoints that are required for uncontrolled cell division. About 5–10% of breast and ovarian cancer occurs as a result of highly penetrant germline mutations. Two major breast cancer susceptibility genes are BRCA1 (MIM 113705, Genbank accession no. U14680) and BRCA2 (MIM 600185, Genbank accession no. U43746), located on long arms of chromosomes 17 [7] and 13 [8], respectively. and both apparently function as tumor suppressor genes. BRCA1 is a large protein of 1863 amino acids and BRCA2, with 3418 amino acids, is even larger. Both the proteins are involved in control of homologous recombination (HR) and double-strand break repair in response to DNA damage [914].

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were first reported in conjunction with their identification in 1994 [15] and 1995 [16, 17]. To date 1536 distinct mutations, polymorphisms and variants in BRCA1 and 1885 in BRCA2 have been reported [BIC database, [18]], which are distributed throughout the entire coding regions of both genes. Together, mutations in both the genes account for the great majority of families with hereditary susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer [19].

Epidemiological studies indicate that BRCA1 mutation carriers have a lifetime risk of breast cancer that is on the order of 60–80% [1921]. The lifetime breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers approaches that of BRCA1 carriers: however, disease onset has been documented to be at a later age [19, 21]. In other words, women with an altered BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene are 3 to 7 times more likely to develop breast cancer than women without alterations in those genes [22], with very high relative risks for early disease onset (before age 40) of about 30-fold. Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation(s) are also at increased risk for other cancers – in particular, both genes increase the risk of ovarian cancer, while BRCA2 confers greatly increased risks of male breast cancer. Additional, but more modest risks are found for uterine, cervical, early-onset prostate and pancreatic cancers for BRCA1 [23], and prostatic, pancreatic, gallbladder, bile duct, stomach cancers and melanoma for BRCA2 [24].

The spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has been characterized in different populations worldwide, with significant variation of the relative contribution of these genes to hereditary cancer between populations and examples of population specific founder mutations (BRCA1: 185delAG, 5382insC, BRCA2:6174delT in Jews, BRCA2: 999del5 in the Icelandic population) [reviewed in [25]]. However, the contribution of mutations in these two genes to breast cancer patients in the Indian population remains relatively unexplored apart from a few small studies [2630]. Hence there is a need for screening a larger number of samples to investigate the role of BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations in the high-risk group of familial as well as early onset cases, which forms the largest group of breast cancer patients in the Indian population.

We have screened 204 breast cancer cases from North India for mutations throughout the entire coding region of both genes. The main focus behind the study is to provide reliable hospital based estimates of genetic influence, and to characterize the nature and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in early-onset and familial breast cancer cases.


Case selection

Two hundred and four patients of breast cancer referred from the department(s) of Surgery and Cancer Surgery Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi and LLRM Medical College Meerut during 1999–2003 were selected for the study.

Selection of patients was mainly based on the following criteria: any patient with breast cancer diagnosed under the age of 40 years; any patient having a family history of breast or ovarian cancer; any patient having a previous personal history of ovarian cancer; and any male patient with or without family history. However, a few patients unslected for age of onset or family history were also included.

The study group included total 204 patients (Table 1); 105(51.4%) early onset, 65(31.8%) late onset and 34 (16.6%) familial cases. Out of 204, 11 cases are bilateral (5 synchronous, 6 metachronous) and 8 are male breast cancer cases.

Table 1 Characteristics of Breast carcinoma patients.

The patient's ages ranged from 13 to 78 years with a mean age of 40.9 years (median 40 years). Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients and the study was carried out with the approval of Ethical Review Committee of Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi.

To examine the population frequency of any sequence variants identified in the patients, a series of 140 age-matched control samples were also collected from women attending antenatal checkups and blood bank donors in Delhi. The majority of control individuals were under 45 years (77%) and 71% were females.

Blood sample collection

Peripheral blood samples (ca.10 ml) were collected into EDTA vials. The buffy coat was separated and frozen at -70°C for further use.

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using a standard phenol-chloroform extraction method. Blood was first digested with lyses buffer I (30 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA and 50 mM NaCl) and lyses buffer II (20% SDS, 100 μg/ml Prot.K) followed by the extraction with Tris saturated phenol and Chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and finally recovered by ethanol precipitation.

Mutation detection

The complete coding regions and exon-intron boundaries for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened for DNA sequence variants by Heteroduplex analysis (HDX) of PCR amplicons using exon specific primers [31].

PCR reactions were carried out in a volume of 15 μl with 70–100 ng genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer (20 mM Tris-Hcl pH 8.4,50 mM KCl), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dNTP mix, 10 μM of both forward and reverse primer, 0.2 U platinum Taq (Invitrogen) and 0.4 μCi [α-P33] dATP (BRIT, Department of Atomic Energy, India). An initial de-naturation of 94°C for 3 min was followed by 40 cycles of amplification (30 s/94°C, 30 s/primer specific annealing temperature, and 30 s/72°C) and final elongation of 3 min/74°C.

Samples were diluted 1:1 in formamide dye (98% formamide, 10 mM NaOH, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 0.05% xylene cyanol) and 5 μl of each was loaded onto a HDX gel (40 × 40 cm; containing 0.5× MDE, 0.6× TBE, 4% glycerol, 400 μl 10%APS, 40 μl TEMED) and run at 8–10 mA for 16–20 hrs in 0.6× TBE at room temperature.

Gels were dried under vacuum at 80°C for 2 hrs and exposed to film (KODAK BioMax-MR Amersham, USA) for 10–12 hrs with an intensifying screen.

To rule out the possibility of PCR fidelity artefacts, both PCR amplification and gel based heteroduplex analysis was done twice for samples that showed altered mobility on HDX gels.

PCR products showing an aberrant banding pattern were re-amplified for sequencing using the same primers as for HDX analysis. DNA samples were sequenced either manually (Sequenase PCR Product Sequencing Kit and [α-33P] dATP (Amersham Life science) according to manufacturer's instruction) and by Automated genetic analysis (ABI 310/3100, Applied Biosystems, CA) to determine the exact sequence alteration identified. Samples were sequenced in both the forward and reverse sense to corroborate the findings.

Results and discussion

The incidence of breast cancer in India has been increasing in recent years and is likely to pose an ever-increasing health care burden as socio-economic changes bring about increased exposure to lifestyle risk factors. The earlier average age of onset among Indian women compared to Western populations and the increased likelihood of early-onset disease being attributable to genetic susceptibility suggests the existence of a strong genetic component in this population. Evaluation of age of onset and family history among breast cancer patients diagnosed in Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi supports these observations. Mean age of onset for 569 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 1989–2003 was 47.8 years, with the most common age group consisting of women 45–54 years (31.8%). Approximately 22% of cases were diagnosed under the age of 40 years. Of the 226 cases for whom family history information was available, 47 (20.7%) reported at least one additional breast or ovarian cancer case in first or second-degree relatives [32]. To determine the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to breast cancer in women of North India, we screened for alterations in the coding sequences and intron-exon boundaries of both genes in 204 breast cancer patients and 140 age-matched controls. This represents the largest study to date of the BRCA genes in the Indian population.

Sequence variants in BRCA 1 & 2 genes

In total, 18 sequence variants were identified in the study group, including 3 frame shift (FS), 1 missense (MS), 1 5'UTR alteration, 1 silent substitution, and 3 intronic variants in BRCA1 (Table 2) and 3 FS, 1 MS, 1 silent and 4 intronic variants in the BRCA 2 gene (Table 3).

Table 2 BRCA1/BRCA2 deleterious mutations in Indian Breast Cancer patients
Table 3 BRCA1/BRCA2 sequence variants of unknown significance and known polymorphisms in Indian Breast Cancer patients

Additional sequence variants detected in this study included 4 common polymorphisms (BRCA1: K1183R in exon 11, S1613G and M1652I in exon 16; BRCA2: 7470A>G in exon 14) previously identified in other populations and reported in the BIC. These polymorphisms were observed in similar frequencies for both patients and controls.

No sequence alterations were observed in male and bilateral breast cancer patients.

Frame-shift mutations in BRCA1

Three previously reported deleterious frame-shift mutations resulting in a premature termination codon were identified in BRCA1: 185delAG in exon 2; 3596del4 and 4184del4 in exon 11). These mutations were not observed in the control group.

The BRCA1 185delAG mutation was identified in an early onset index case [age 35] without any family history. This mutation is common in Ashkenazi Jews, having attained a 1% carrier frequency within the population [33] since origin of the ancestral mutation [34]. Population studies have shown that the 185delAG mutation predates the separation of Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jewish populations and is probably 2000 years old [35].

In India, 185delAG has been reported in all populations studied (Table 4) [2630]. This deleterious frame shift mutation was first reported in a family residing in a part of Trivandrum not far from the small towns with settlement of Jewish people [26]. It was later reported in two South Indian families from Kerala province [29] as well as in two sisters from Goa, where a multi-ethnic population exists, with a significant influence of Portuguese (potential introduction of the mutation through Sephardic Jews) [30]. Surprisingly, we have found 185delAG in a North Indian Hindu patient residing in New Delhi who claimed to have no Jewish ancestry. Similarly, Lakhotia et al., in their initial screening found the same mutation in four Indian breast cancer families [36]. In addition to the clearly established founder effect for 185delAG, this mutation has been shown to have arisen independently at least twice [37], thus it would be interesting to evaluate the origin and population genetics of these disease susceptibility alleles in the Indian population through haplotype analysis, given the diverse multilingual, multireligious, and multiethnic roots of our society.

Table 4 BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and sequence variants reported in Indian populations.

BRCA1 3596del4 was detected in a Muslim index case of very early onset disease [age 24] without any family history. Interestingly, the same mutation was reported in a heterogeneous Italian population intermixed with French, German, and Slovenian ethnic groups and a large number of Muslim immigrants [38]. These observations suggest that 3596del4 might be a common mutation in the Muslim community and might have migrated to the Indian population through a pool of Muslim immigrants.

The 4184del4 mutation is located towards the C terminus of BRCA1, within the transcriptional activation domain [39, 40], a region also reported to interact with the BRCA2 protein, which plays an important role in double stranded break (DSB) repair.

The above mutation was detected in a late onset index case [age 60] with a strong family history in first-degree relatives, thus belonging to a high-risk group. Her mother and three sisters were all affected with breast cancer. Interestingly, the same mutation was identified in the Pakistani population. One patient identified with this mutation was of Punjabi descent, and the other, who resided in Karachi, identified herself as Sindhi [41]. This mutation has been reported 107 times in the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) website in breast cancer cases of diverse ethnic origins [18]. In a study from northwest England, it was found that the 4184del4 mutation has at least three distinct haplotypic backgrounds, implying that the mutation has occurred independently on at least three occasions, suggesting this to be a mutational hotspot giving rise to recurrent mutations [42]. Haplotypic analysis would be interesting in this case also to determine whether 4184del4 has an independent origin in the Indian populaion or whether an existing mutation has been introduced through population admixture.

Frame-shift mutations in BRCA2

Three protein truncating frame-shift mutations unique to Indian women (6376insAA, 8576insC, 9999delA) were observed in the BRCA2 gene.

The BRCA2 frame shift mutation 6376insAA was found in an index case [age 30] without any family history. This mutation is located in the BRC repeats encoded in exon 11. These eight 30–40 residue motifs are conserved between several mammalian species, and have been shown to mediate binding of BRCA2 to the RAD51 protein, a mammalian protein essential for DNA repair and genetic recombination [43].

BRCA2 8576insC in exon 19 was detected in an early onset index case [age 35] without any family history.

The third mutation, 9999delA in exon 27B, was found in a late onset case [age 50], also without any family history.

Missense mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes

Apart from common polymorphisms, only a single missense mutation each was detected in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Neither mutation was detected in any control samples (280 chromosomes).

A novel BRCA1 missense, K1667R, along with a silent alteration 1679L in exon 17 was observed in the same high-risk index case [age 35] with a strong family history in first-degree relatives, thus suggesting its disease association.

One BRCA2 missense alteration A2951T was observed in exon 22. This mutation was observed in only one index case [age 40] without any family history. Originally reported as a polymorphism with a modest carrier frequency of 0.006 in an American population [44], our failure to detect this variant in any control samples suggests that this alteration may not represent a common polymorphism in the North Indian population.

Functional significance

Missense mutations may be pathogenic, depending upon the nature of the amino acid substitution and its effect on protein structure or function. In general, missense alterations in conserved protein motifs are more likely to be deleterious. Missense amino acid changes in the p53-binding domain or the transactivation domain of BRCA1 adjacent to a BRCT repeat have been shown to be pathogenic [45, 46]. Interestingly, the BRCA1 missense alteration K1667R is located in the BRCT domain. These conserved motifs are found in many other proteins, and are involved in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Tumor associated mutations are predicted to disrupt the folding or stability of the BRCT domain and thus effect protein function [46].

Non-conservative amino acid substitutions may disrupt protein folding, and BRCA2 A2591T leads to substitution of the non-polar hydrophobic amino acid alanine by polar hydrophilic threonine. However, although A2951 is invariant in vertebrate species through puffer fish, suggesting strong evolutionary conservation due to functional constraints, the frequency of this variant in disease-free individuals is counter indicative, and additional data are required to evaluate potential disease-association of this allele.

In addition to missense mutations, many variants outside of the exonic amino acid coding sequences were identified. One intriguing BRCA1 alteration, 22 C>G, was observed in the 5'UTR region which contains a consensus sequence of 5'-CCAGCCAUG-3' involved in the initiation of protein synthesis. This variant was detected in one patient but was absent in the control group. It may be possible that this mutation interferes with normal translational initiation of BRCA1, giving rise to a hypomorphic allele that may confer some risk of breast cancer; however, the exact functional significance remains uncertain.

While the exact functional relevance of the intronic variants identified in our study is not known, they may lead to aberrant splicing, either through alteration of consensus splice sites or other splice enhancer sequences. Exon skipping, the most frequent outcome, is thought to result from failure of the mutant splice sites to define an exon. BRCA1 IVS13 (+2) T>C in exon 13 was identified in the present study as well as in another patient in the previous pilot study [27]. This variant is within the consensus splice donor sequence, and hence could lead to aberrant splicing. Evaluating the effect of this variant on BRCA1 mRNA processing could support its functional significance. However, this awaits resampling of the respective mutation carriers, as at present, tissue samples for these patients are available only in the form of paraffin embedded blocks.


We observed 9 distinct BRCA1 and 9 distinct BRCA2 sequence variants; 4 of the 9 BRCA1 (44%) and 7 of the 9 BRCA2 mutations (78%) are unique to the Indian population and are distributed throughout the exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene. Of these 18 mutations, six clearly deleterious sequence variants were detected in 2.94% of the tested patients. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in our Indian patient series appears to be low compared to other Asian countries [[41, 47] and [48]] but is comparatively similar to that reported from Shanghai China [49]. In addition, similar mutation frequencies were observed in series of early onset breast cancer cases in Britain [50].

It is possible that of the further 13 variants of uncertain clinical significance identified in 15 additional patients, some may be disease causal. These variants can be further evaluated in order to classify them into high- or low-risk categories based on epidemiological observations including degree of family history and segregation of the variant with disease. Additional classifiers include amino acid conservation, severity of amino acid change and evidence from functional assays [51].

In this study, scanning for the presence of sequence variation was performed by analyzing PCR amplicons using gel based HDX. It is estimated that the mutation detection sensitivity of the heteroduplex method utilized is approximately 80% [52]. Although the sensitivity of this approach is lower than some other mutation analysis techniques (e.g dHPLC, direct sequencing), it is relatively inexpensive, reasonably high throughput, technically simple to perform, and has been applied successfully for numerous genetic disorders – including BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening [31]. To increase the efficacy of mutation detection, the screening for mutations in both the genes was repeated by HDX in all familial cases. Moreover no currently available technique can guarantee 100% detection of pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. In particular, all PCR based methods are unable to detect large genomic rearrangements that occur frequently in both genes and can account for a significant proportion of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations [5359].

Nevertheless, the number of clearly disease-associated mutations identified in the studied North-Indian population is lower than observed elsewhere. However, a significant proportion of women who had breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤40 years without any family history were carriers (all variants: 14.2%, known deleterious mutations: 3.8%). On the other hand, the identified mutations account for a comparatively small proportion of the familial risk of breast cancer (all variants: 11.7%, known deleterious mutations: 2.9%). This suggests one of several possibilities with respect to genetic predisposition in the North Indian population. First, there may be a significant proportion of BRCA1/2 mutations that are large germ line rearrangements, which would not have been detected by the method of mutation screening employed. Second, it is possible that there are some unknown genes, which may contribute more significantly to familial breast carcinoma in this population than do BRCA1 and BRCA2.

The present study is in agreement with the findings from our pilot study done on a small independent group of 20 breast cancer patients where 3 out of 5 cases with mutations in BRCA1/2 had early onset disease [27]. Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that women with early-onset disease without family history are likely to have a disease associated alteration of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. A similar viewpoint has been put forwarded by a study conducted on Iranian women where it concluded that early onset breast cancer with a limited family history or without family history [60] is sufficient to justify mutation screening. It is possible that the significant number of early onset patients without reported family history have BRCA1/2 germ line mutations that are paternally inherited. In many cultures, knowledge of family history of disease is better documented along matrilineal lines, particularly those diseases that are gender restricted.

A possible explanation for the earlier age of disease onset in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers could be high circulatory estrogen levels in younger women compared to elderly women. According to one hypothesis, the total number of ovulatory cycles and thus exposure to higher estrogen level is a significant factor contributing to the risk of breast cancer [61]. Estrogen exposure is hypothesized to increase the susceptibility to breast tissue to carcinogenesis through continued cell division and proliferation resulting from multiple ovulatory cycles, principally between menarche and first birth, thus allowing for a concomitant increase in the accumulation of random genetic errors [62, 63]. Increased estrogenic exposures increase the rate of proliferation, hence magnifying the effect. Studies have shown that wild-type BRCA1 blocks estrogen receptor (ER) mediated transcriptional activation, thereby inhibiting estrogenic signalling [64]. These observations could account for the higher proportion of early-onset breast cancer in populations where exposures to risk factors that primarily influence post-menopausal breast cancer risks are, as yet, relatively low.

Extensive mutation screening of high-risk breast cancer primarily targeting early-onset cases should be undertaken in India with proper genetic counseling, since female carriers of mutations in these genes are also at a high risk for developing a second malignancy either in the breast or ovary. Personal risk information may help in taking preventive measures and also motivate a high-risk woman to adopt breast screening that may promote early detection and improve chances of surviving breast cancer.


  1. 1.

    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global CancerStatistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    GLOBOCAN 2002, IARC. []

  3. 3.

    Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J, eds: Cancer incidence in five Continents. 1997, Lyon: IARC. (IARC Scientific Publications 143), VIII:

  4. 4.

    National Cancer Registry Programme: Ten year consolidated report of the Hospital Based Cancer Registries, 1984–1993, An assessment of the burden and care of cancer patients. 2001, Indian Counsil of Medical Research, New Delhi. India

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Consolidated report of the population based cancer registries. 2001, Indian Counsil of Medical Research, NCRP [National Cancer Registry Programme]. New Delhi, 1990-6.

  6. 6.

    Parkin DM, Whelann SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB, eds: International Agency for research on cancer [IARC], Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Lyon, France, [Eds] IARC (Scientific Publication 2002 No.155), VIII:

  7. 7.

    Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, Morrow JE, Anderson LA, Huey B, King MC: Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome17q21. Science. 1990, 250: 1684-1689. 10.1126/science.2270482.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, Quirk Y, Ford D, Collins N, Nguyen K, Seal S, Tran T, Averill D: Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. Science. 1994, 265: 2088-90. 10.1126/science.8091231.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Scully R, Livingston DM: In Search of the tomour-supperssor function of BRCA1and BRCA2. Nature. 2000, 408: 429-432. 10.1038/35044000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Scully R, Puget N, Vlasakova K: DNA polymerase stalling, sister chromatid recombination and the BRCA genes. Oncogenes. 2000, 19: 6176-6183. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203971.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang Q, Zhang H, Fishel R, Greene MI: BRCA1 and cell signaling. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 6152-6158. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203974.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang L, Li S, Boyer TG, Lee WH: Lessons learned from BRCA1 and BRCA2. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 6159-6175. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhong Q, Chen CF, Li S, Chen Y, Wang CC, Xiao J, Chen PL, Sharp ZD, Lee WH: Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11-p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science. 1999, 285: 747-750. 10.1126/science.285.5428.747.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Welcsh Piri, King Mary-Claire: BRCA1 and BRCA2 and genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. Human Molecular Genetics. 2001, 10: 7705-713. 10.1093/hmg/10.7.705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding W: A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994, 266: 66-71. 10.1126/science.7545954.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, Collins N, Gregory S, Gumbs C, Micklem G: Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature. 1995, 378: 789-92. 10.1038/378789a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tavtigian SV, Simard J, Rommens J, Couch F, Shattuck-Eidens D, Neuhausen S, Merajver S, Thorlacius S, Offit K, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Belanger C, Bell R, Berry S, Bogden R, Chen Q, Davis T, Dumont M, Frye C, Hattier T, Jammulapati S, Janecki T, Jiang P, Kehrer R, Leblanc JF, Goldgar DE: The complete BRCA2 gene and mutations in chromosome13q-linked kindreds. Nat Genet. 1996, 12: 333-7. 10.1038/ng0396-333.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    1996, []

  19. 19.

    Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, Sobol H, Teare MD, Struewing J, Arason A, Scherneck S, Peto J, Rebbeck TR, Tonin P, Neuhausen S, Barkardottir R, Eyfjord J, Lynch H, Ponder BA, Gayther SA, Zelada-Hedman M: Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 676-89. 10.1086/301749.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE: Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Lancet. 1994, 343: 692-5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91578-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, Pasini B, Radice P, Manoukian S, Eccles DM, Tang N, Olah E, Anton-Culver H, Warner E, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Gorski B, Tulinius H, Thorlacius S, Eerola H, Nevanlinna H, Syrjakoski K, Kallioniemi OP, Thompson D, Evans C, Peto J, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Easton DF: Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 1117-30. 10.1086/375033.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: It's Your Choice Cancer Facts 2/6/2002. []

  23. 23.

    Thompson D, Easton DF, Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium: Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 1358-65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium: Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 1310-1316. 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Szabo CI, King MC: Population genetics of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60: 1013-20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kumar BV, Lakhotia S, Ankathil R, Madhavan J, Jayaprakash PG, Nair MK, Somasundaram K: Germline BRCA1 mutation analysis in Indian Breast/Ovarian cancer families. Cancer Biol Ther. 2002, 1 (1): 18-21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Saxena S, Szabo C, Chopin S, Barjhoux L, Sinilnikova O, Lenoir G, Goldgar DE, Bhatnagar D: BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Indian Breast Cancer Patients. Human Mutation. 2002, 20 (6): 473-474. 10.1002/humu.9082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Valarmathi MTAA, Deo SS, Shukla NK, Das SN: BRCA1 germline mutations in Indian familial breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2003, 21: 98-9. 10.1002/humu.9099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Valarmathi MT, Sawhney M, Suryanarayana SV, Deo SS, Shukla NK, Das SN: Novel germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Indian breast and breast-ovarian cancer families. Hum Mutat. 2004, 23: 205-10.1002/humu.9213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hedau S, Jain N, Syed A, Husain , Das BC: Novel germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2 and p53 gene in breast cancer patients from India. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2004, 88: 177-186. 10.1007/s10549-004-0593-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Serova OM, Mazoyer S, Puget N, Dubois V, Tonin P, Shugart YY, Goldgar D, Narod SA, Lynch HT, Lenoir GM: Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: Are there more breast cancer susceptibility genes?. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60: 1013-20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Saxena S, Rekhi B, Bansal A, Bagga A, Chintamani , Murthy NS: Clinico-morphological patterns of breast cancer including family history in a New Delhi hospital, India – a cross-sectional study. World J Surg Oncol. 2005, 3: 67-10.1186/1477-7819-3-67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Struewing JP, Abeliovich D, Peretz T, Avishai N, Kaback MM, Collins FS, Brody LC: The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nat Genet. 1995, 11: 198-200. 10.1038/ng1095-198.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Neuhausen SL, Mazoyer S, Friedman LS, Stratton M, Offit K, Caligo A, Tomlinson G, Cannon-Albright L, Bishop T, Kelsell D, Solomon E, Weber B, Couch F, Struewing J, Tonin P, Durocher F, Narod S, Skolnick M, Lenoir G, Serova O, Ponder B, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Easton D, King MC, Goldgar DE: Haplotype and phenotype analysis of six recurrent BRCA1 mutations in 61 families: results of an International study. Am J Hum Genet. 1996, 58: 271-280.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bar-Sade RB, Kruglikova A, Modan B, Gak E, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, Theodor L, Novikov I, Gershoni-Baruch R, Risel S, Papa MZ, Ben-Baruch G, Friedman E: The 185delAG BRCA1 mutation originated before the dispersion of Jews in the diaspora and is not limited to Ashkenazim. Human Molecular Genetics. 1998, 7: 801-805. 10.1093/hmg/7.5.801.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lakhotia , Somasundaram : Conformation Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis for detecting BRCA1 mutations. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2003, 223: 403-414.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xu CF, Chambers JA, Nicolai H, Brown MA, Hujeirat Y, Mohammed S, Hodgson S, Kelsell DP, Spurr NK, Bishop DT, Solomon E: Mutations and alternative splicing of the BRCA1 gene in UK breast/ovarian cancer families. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1997, 18: 102-10. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199702)18:2<102::AID-GCC4>3.0.CO;2-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Stuppia L, Di Fulvio P, Aceto G, Pintor S, Veschi S, Gatta V, Colosimo A, Cianchetti E, Cama A, Mariani-Costantini R, Battista P, Palka G: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast/ovarian cancer patients from central Italy. Human Mutation. 2003, 22: 178-179. 10.1002/humu.9164.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chapman MS, Verrma IM: Transcriptional activation by BRCA1. Nature. 1996, 382: 678-679. 10.1038/382678a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Monterio ANA, August A, Hanafusa H: Evidence of a transcriptional activation function of BRCA1 C-terminal region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 13595-13599. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liede A, Malik IA, Aziz Z, Rios P, Kwan E, Narod SA: Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations to Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Pakistan. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 71 (3): 595-606. 10.1086/342506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Evan DGR, Nauhausen , Bulman M, Young K, Gokhale D, Lalloo F: Haplotype and cancer risk analysis of two common mutations, BRCA1 4184del4 and BRCA2 2157delG, in high risk northwest England breast/ovarian families. J Med genet. 2004, 41: e21-10.1136/jmg.2003.012104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bork P, Blomberg N, Nilges M: Internal repeats in BRCA2 protein sequence. Nat Genet. 1996, 13: 22-23. 10.1038/ng0596-22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wagner TMU, Hirtenlehner K, Shen P, Moeslinger R, Muhr D, Fleischmann E, Concin H, Doeller W, Haid A, Lang AH, Mayer P, Petru E, Ropp E, Langbauer G, Kubista E, Scheiner O, Underhill P, Mountain J, Stierer M, Zielinski C, Oefner P: Global sequence diversity of BRCA2: analysis of 71 breast cancer families and 95 control individuals of worldwide populations. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 413-23. 10.1093/hmg/8.3.413.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhang H, Somasundaram K, Peng Y: BRCA1 physically associates with p53 and stimulates its transcriptional activity. Oncogene. 1998, 16: 1713-1721.39. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201932.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Monteiro ANA, August A, Hanafusa H: Common BRCA1 variants and transcriptional activation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 61: 761-762.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Balraj P, Khoo ASB, Volpi L, Tan JA, Nair S, Abdullah H: Mutation analysis of the BRCA1 gene in Malaysian breast cancer patients. Singapore Med J. 2002, 43 (4): 194-197.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    De Leon Matsuda M, Liede A, Kwan E, Mapua CA, Cutiongco EM, Tan A, Borg A, Narod SA: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among breast cancer patients from the Philippines. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 596-603. 10.1002/ijc.10194.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Suter NM, Ray RM, Hu YW, Lin MG, Porter P, Gao DL, Zaucha RE, Iwasaki LM, Sabacan LP, Langlois MC, Thomas DB, Ostrander EA: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women from Shanghai China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13: 181-9. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0196.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Peto J, Collins N, Barfoot R, Seal S, Warren W, Rahman N, Easton DF, Evans C, Deacon J, Stratton MR: Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 943-9. 10.1093/jnci/91.11.943.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Deffenbaugh AM, Monteiro ANA, Tavitgian SV: Integrated evaluation of DNA sequence Variants of Unknown Clinical Significance: Application to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 75: 535-544. 10.1086/424388.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Eng C, Brody LC, Wagner TM, Devilee P, Vijg J, Szabo C, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL, Ostrander E, Frank TS, Steering Committee of the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) Consortium: Interpreting epidemiological research: blinded comparison of methods used to estimate the prevalence of inherited mutations in BRCA1. J Med Gene. 2001, 38: 824-33. 10.1136/jmg.38.12.824.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Puget N, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sinilnikova OM, Pages S, Lynch HT, Lenoir GM, Mazoyer S: Screening for germ-line rearrangements and regulatory mutations in BRCA1 led to the identification of four new deletions. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 455-61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Unger MA, Nathanson KL, Calzone K, Antin-Ozerkis D, Shih HA, Martin AM, Lenoir GM, Mazoyer S, Weber BL: Screening for genomic rearrangements in families with breast and ovarian cancer identifies BRCA1 mutations previously missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencing. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67: 841-50. 10.1086/303076.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Montagna M, Dalla Palma M, Menin C, Agata S, De Nicolo A, Chieco-Bianchi L, D'Andrea E: Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12: 1055-61. 10.1093/hmg/ddg120.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hogervorst FB, Nederlof PM, Gille JJ, McElgunn CJ, Grippeling M, Pruntel R, Regnerus R, van Welsem T, van Spaendonk R, Menko FH, Kluijt I, Dommering C, Verhoef S, Schouten JP, van't Veer LJ, Pals G: Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative method. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 1449-53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hartmann C, John AL, Klaes R, Hofmann W, Bielen R, Koehler R, Janssen B, Bartram CR, Arnold N, Zschocke J: Large BRCA1 gene deletions are found in 3% of German high-risk breast cancer families. Hum Mutat. 2004, 24: 534-10.1002/humu.9291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Tournier I, Paillerets BB, Sobol H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lidereau R, Barrois M, Mazoyer S, Coulet F, Hardouin A, Chompret A, Lortholary A, Chappuis P, Bourdon V, Bonadona V, Maugard C, Gilbert B, Nogues C, Frébourg T, Tosi M: Significant contribution of germline BRCA2 rearrangements in male breast cancer families. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 8143-7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2467.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J, Roach KC, Mandell J, Lee MK, Ciernikova S, Foretova L, Soucek P, King MC: Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2006, 295: 1379-88. 10.1001/jama.295.12.1379.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yassaee VR, Zeinali S, Harirchi I, Jarvandi S, Mohagheghi MA, Hornby DP, Dalton A: Novel mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Iranian women with early-onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2002, 4: R6-10.1186/bcr443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Henderson BE, Ross RK, Judd HL, Krailo MD, Pike MC: Do regular ovulatory cycles increase breast cancer risk?. Cancer. 1985, 56: 1206-08. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<1206::AID-CNCR2820560541>3.0.CO;2-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Preston-Martin S, Pike MC, Ross RK, Henderson BE: Epidemiologic evidence for the increased cell proliferation model of carcinogenesis. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1991, 369: 21-34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    De Waard: Preventive intervention in breast cancer, but when?. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1992, 1: 395-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fan S, Wang J, Yuan R, Ma Y, Meng Q, Erdos MR, Pestell RG, Yuan F, Auborn KJ, Goldberg ID, Rosen EM: BRCA1 inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling in transfected cells. Science. 1999, 284: 1354-10.1126/science.284.5418.1354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


We thank the patients and their families, without whose cooperation this study would not have been possible. We also thank Mrs Valsamma Methews for technical support.

This project was supported through a research grant 2303-5 (S.Saxena, G.Lenoir) from the Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research., New Delhi. Financial assistance from IFCPAR is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Saxena.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SS conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination and data analysis

AC carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript.

MK carried out the molecular genetic studies.

C.I.S wrote the project proposal and manuscript, standardizing the research techniques and assisted with data analysis

D.E.G imparted training in research techniques and helped in drafting manuscript

SK, DB, R.S.M, Chintamani – helped in collecting samples and clinical details.

A.K.A, V.K.S – helped in collecting samples and clinical details.

P.C.S – participated in result analysis.

G.L. – conceived the study

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxena, S., Chakraborty, A., Kaushal, M. et al. Contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2sequence alterations to breast cancer in Northern India. BMC Med Genet 7, 75 (2006).

Download citation


  • Breast Cancer
  • Breast Cancer Patient
  • Breast Cancer Risk
  • BRCA2 Mutation
  • BRCA2 Gene