We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Evaluation of the need for routine clinical testing of PALB2 c.1592delT mutation in BRCA negative Northern Finnish breast cancer families
BMC Medical Geneticsvolume 14, Article number: 82 (2013)
Testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes among high-risk breast cancer patients has become a routine practice among clinical geneticists. Unfortunately, however, the genetic background of a majority of the cases coming to the clinics remains currently unexplained, making genetic counseling rather challenging. In recent years it has become evident world-wide that also women carrying a heterozygous germline mutation in PALB2 are at significantly increased risk of getting breast cancer. We have previously studied the clinical as well as biological impact of the PALB2 c.1592delT founder mutation occurring in about 1% of Finnish breast cancer patients unselected for their family history of disease, and our results demonstrated a 40% increased breast cancer risk by age 70 for female mutation carriers. Thus, this relatively common mutation in PALB2 is associated with a high risk of developing breast cancer. The aim of the current study was to analyze whether female index individuals of breast cancer families who had tested negative for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 as part of genetic counseling services should be offered mutation testing for PALB2 c.1592delT.
The study cohort consisted of altogether 223 individuals who had contacted the Department of Clinical Genetics at the Oulu University Hospital in Finland between the years 1997 and 2011 for counseling on hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk. 101 of them met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 persons were now deceased, but 6 of them had participated in one of our previous studies on PALB2. Seventy (77%) of the remaining 91 persons responded positively to our study invitation. Chart review of updated pedigree data led to the exclusion of 14 further individuals not meeting the selection criteria.
Of the 56 alive affected female individuals screened for PALB2 c.1592delT, altogether two (3.6%) tested positive for this mutation. In addition, of the previously tested but now deceased 6 persons eligible for the current study, one more mutation carrier was observed. Therefore, overall 4.8% (3/62) of the tested individuals belonging to the Northern Finnish 1997–2011 study cohort turned out to be carriers of the PALB2 c.1592delT allele.
Given the potential benefits versus harms of this testing, the result of our study suggest that PALB2 c.1592delT should be a routine part of the genetic counseling protocol for Finnish high-risk breast cancer cases tested negative for mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2.
It has been estimated that about 5-10% of all breast cancer cases are caused by dominantly inherited mutations . BRCA1 and BRCA2 are clinically the most important genes associated with breast cancer susceptibility [2, 3]. Depending of the studied population, heterozygous mutations in these two high-penetrance cancer genes are responsible for 20-30% of familial breast cancer cases [2, 3]. A meta-analysis of 22 studies by Antoniou and colleagues  found the cumulative risk of breast cancer by age 70 to be 65% in BRCA1 and 45% in BRCA2 mutation carriers. At cellular level, BRCA1 and BRCA2 have many important functions integral for a successful response to DNA damage . Many other genes have also been implicated in breast cancer predisposition due to their essential role in the same pathway required to maintain genomic integrity. Among them, PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2) has emerged as a breast cancer susceptibility gene in several populations world-wide . PALB2-BRCA2 interaction is essential for the DNA double-strand break repair functions of BRCA2  and PALB2 also functionally connects the BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins . Furthermore, PALB2 is an important regulator of homologous recombination . The biological functions of BRCA proteins have led to clinical trials testing targeted therapies, particularly those utilizing PARP (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitors . PARP is an important regulator of the DNA base-excision –repair pathway . Analogous to BRCA1/2-deficiency, PALB2-deficient cells are sensitive to PARP inhibitors .
Individuals who carry germline mutations in the PALB2 gene are at increased risk of breast cancer . PALB2 mutations have also been linked to pancreatic cancer in families with concomitant breast cancer . The Finnish founder mutation c.1592delT in exon 4 causes a frameshift on Leu531 and premature truncation of the PALB2 protein . This mutation is present at a significantly elevated frequency in familial breast cancer cases compared with ancestry-matched population controls. Also the studied unselected breast cancer cohort showed a roughly 4-fold enrichment of the mutation compared with controls . The c.1592delT mutation is associated with a 6-fold increased risk of breast cancer; equivalent to a ~40% risk for developing breast cancer by the age of 70 years. This is comparable to that for carriers of mutations in BRCA2. The average age for the onset of breast cancer in PALB2 c.1592delT carriers is 53.1 years, which is somewhat higher than in Finnish BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers (45.2/47.4 years), but considerably lower than in sporadic patients (58.0 years) . Furthermore, the breast tumors of PALB2 carriers manifest a phenotype associated with aggressive disease, and mutation carriers also display reduced survival .
The purpose of genetic counseling is to allow individuals an opportunity to learn how heredity contributes to their personal risk of developing cancer. The key to the identification of individuals who will benefit from genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility genes lies in the risk assessment process. It is well established that patients should be offered a molecular analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes when (1) the family history is suspicious for a cancer predisposition syndrome; (2) the results can be adequately interpreted; and (3) the results will influence medical management . The aim of this study was to evaluate whether PALB2 c.1592delT mutation testing should be part of routine clinical counseling in families fulfilling the criteria for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing, but found negative for mutations in these genes. The sensitivity of our current BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analysis protocol was also defined for genetic counseling purposes. Here we have screened affected index persons of Northern Finnish high-risk hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families for presence of the PALB2 c.1592delT mutation.
Subjects were selected among the individuals who had been in contact with the Oulu University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics between years 1997 and 2011. Altogether 223 individuals contacted the outpatient clinic because they or their first-degree relative had been diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Inclusion for the current study was done according to the following criteria of high-risk hereditary breast cancer (the Lund criteria): (1) the individual or her first-degree relative (only female family members were included when defining first-degree relatives) had breast and/or ovarian cancer at an age younger than 30 years; or (2) two first-degree relatives in the family had breast and/or ovarian cancer and at least one of the cancers had been diagnosed at an age younger than 40 years; or (3) three first-degree relatives in the family had breast and/or ovarian cancer and at least one of the cancers had been diagnosed at an age younger than 50 years; or (4) four or more relatives had breast and/or ovarian cancer; or (5) the same individual had both breast and ovarian cancer. Individuals with bilateral breast cancer were considered having two separate cancers. BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive mutation status was an exclusion criteria: altogether 16 individuals were excluded because they or their close relative was tested positive for a BRCA mutation.
Of the initial 223 individuals, 101 met the inclusion criteria based on their pedigree data. Of the eligible persons, 10 were now deceased but 6 of them had participated in one of our previous studies on PALB2. The remaining 91 were alive at the time of ascertainment and were invited by a letter to participate in our study. Seventy individuals responded (70/91 = 77%) and provided us with information on their family history of cancer. Chart review led to the further exclusion of 14 individuals as they did not meet the selection criteria. Altogether the current Northern Finnish 1997–2011 study cohort that was tested for PALB2 c.1592delT carrier status consisted of 62 (56 alive and 6 deceased) affected female individuals (see Figure 1). Informed consent had been obtained from all participants. After completed laboratory analysis, the patients still alive were informed about their mutation status, if they had requested this information. Appropriate genetic counseling was arranged if desired. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Oulu University Hospital (12/2000 and 12/2011).
Fifty-six well-characterized high-risk hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-negative Northern Finnish individuals were screened for the PALB2 c.1592delT germline mutation. The mutation screening was performed on peripheral blood DNA by using high resolution melting (HRM) analysis and direct sequencing. Samples with deviations in their melt curves in HRM were reamplified and sequenced with capillary sequencing using ABI3130x1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). For ABI the Big dye terminator kit v1.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used. Chromatograms were interpreted using CodonCode Aligner v.3.5.4 (Codon Code Corporation, Dedham, MA, USA) and MEGA4 software . Oligonucleotides for HRM and sequencing were designed using Primer3 software . Primer sequences, detailed HRM and PCR reaction conditions are available upon request. PALB2 mutation detection for the 6 eligible but now deceased 1997–2011 study cohort persons was carried out as mentioned in our previous study .
Information on tumor histology, grade, size, nodal status and distant metastasis were collected from pathology reports. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status were confirmed by a breast cancer pathologist. Evaluation of the results and the staining methods used in routine diagnostics has been described by Eerola et al. .
Of the 56 alive index patients, two carried the PALB2 c.1592delT mutation (2/56 = 3.6%). In addition, among the 6 previously tested but now deceased persons eligible for the current study, one more mutation carrier was observed. Therefore, overall 4.8% (3/62) of the individuals belonging to the Northern Finnish 1997–2011 study cohort turned out to be carriers of the PALB2 c.1592delT allele. The observed frequency is slightly higher to that reported in the previous study, where the c.1592delT mutation was found in 2.6% of familial breast cancer cases with a strong family history of the disease . The difference is probably due to the use of even more stringent inclusion criteria for the patients participating in the current study.
The cancer types of the three observed PALB2 mutation positive individuals fitted well to that described previously : all three cases had ductal tumor histology and exhibited positive estrogen and progesterone receptor status (Table 1). Besides breast cancer, two of the families also displayed several other malignancy types, including ovarian, pancreatic and uterus cancer (see Figure 2 for family pedigrees).
The currently identified mutation positive individuals still being alive were then invited for genetic counseling, where they were also offered the possibility of more careful cancer surveillance. An opportunity for genetic counseling was offered also to their family members.
The identification of breast cancer susceptibility genes, particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2, has revolutionized the management of women with a family history of the disease . Individuals undergoing cancer genetic counseling must understand the benefits, limitations and risks of genetic testing. If a deleterious mutation is identified, it allows for predictive testing in at-risk family members . However, at this moment, if no mutations in these two susceptibility genes are identified, usually no more genetic testing for additional rare cancer-predisposing syndromes is offered in Finland, unless indicated by specific findings and/or family history. Consequently, the members of these BRCA1/2-negative high-risk families lack any specific information about their individual risks. However, as the PALB2 c.1592delT founder mutation, with a frequency of roughly 1% also in Finnish breast cancer cases unselected for their family history of disease, increases the risk of breast cancer in a way comparable to that of BRCA2, targeted clinical testing for c.1592delT seems appropriate. It has also been suggested that a more careful presymptomatic screening, as well as more aggressive adjuvant treatment, should be considered for PALB2 c.1592delT carriers . Of the currently studied 62 female index individuals who had tested negative for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, 4.8% were PALB2 mutation carriers. Therefore, approximately the same proportion of the high risk patients, together with their family members, could be offered more specific genetic counseling and predictive testing if PALB2 c.1592delT testing would be a routine part of the national counseling protocol.
Testing for a single and also relatively well-characterized founder mutation has obvious benefits. The molecular analysis for PALB2 c.1592delT is very cost-efficient. Women who test positive for a known gene mutation can make informed decisions about their cancer surveillance, and women with a negative result can avoid unnecessary disease monitoring. Furthermore, targeted therapies may be available for mutation carriers in the future. A deeper understanding of the function of PALB2 may aid the design of therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment, such as the use of PARP inhibitors. The identification of yet additional families with this as well as other PALB2 mutations will lead to better estimates of the associated cancer risks and to better understanding of the optimal surveillance and prophylactic regimens for mutation carriers.
Heterozygosity for PALB2 c.1592delT has a strong effect on breast cancer risk. The mutation is also common enough to make it worthwhile to set up a simple diagnostic test that should be offered as part of genetic counseling to all Finnish high-risk breast cancer cases negative for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The same recommendation would most likely apply also to other high-risk PALB2 founder mutations present in other populations world-wide.
Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD, Risch NJ: The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer. 1996, 77: 2318-2324. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Thompson D, Easton D: The genetic epidemiology of breast cancer genes. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2004, 9: 221-236.
Dite GS, Jenkins MA, Southey MC, Hocking JS, Giles GG, McCredie MR, Venter DJ, Hopper JL: Familial risks, early-onset breast cancer, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 448-457. 10.1093/jnci/95.6.448.
Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, Pasini B, Radice P, Manoukian S, Eccles DM, Tang N, Olah E, Anton-Culver H, Warner E, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Gorski B, Tulinius H, Thorlacius S, Eerola H, Nevanlinna H, Syrjäkoski K, Kallioniemi OP, Thompson D, Evans C, Peto J, et al: Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 1117-1130. 10.1086/375033.
Welcsh PL, Owens KN, King MC: Insights into the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Trends Genet. 2000, 16: 69-74. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01930-7.
Poumpouridou N, Kroupis C: Hereditary breast cancer: beyond BRCA genetic analysis; PALB2 emerges. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011, 50: 423-434.
Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K, Ohashi A, Wu J, Christ N, Liu X, Jasin M, Couch FJ, Livingston DM: Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell. 2006, 22: 719-729. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.022.
Zhang F, Fan Q, Ren K, Andreassen PR: PALB2 functionally connects the breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mol Cancer Res. 2009, 7: 1110-1118. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0123.
Buisson R, Dion-Cote AM, Coulombe Y, Launay H, Cai H, Stasiak AZ, Stasiak A, Xia B, Masson JY: Cooperation of breast cancer proteins PALB2 and piccolo BRCA2 in stimulating homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010, 17: 1247-1254. 10.1038/nsmb.1915.
Maxwell KN, Domchek SM: Cancer treatment according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012, 9: 520-528. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.123.
O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen JE, Yoffe M, Patt D, Rocha C, Koo IC, Sherman BM, Bradley C: Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 205-214. 10.1056/NEJMoa1011418.
Tischkowitz M, Capanu M, Sabbaghian N, Li L, Liang X, Vallee MP, Tavtigian SV, Concannon P, Foulkes WD, Bernstein L, Bernstein JL, Begg CB, WECARE Study Collaborative Group: Rare germline mutations in PALB2 and breast cancer risk: a population-based study. Hum Mutat. 2012, 33: 674-680. 10.1002/humu.22022.
Slater EP, Langer P, Niemczyk E, Strauch K, Butler J, Habbe N, Neoptolemos JP, Greenhalf W, Bartsch DK: PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families. Clin Genet. 2010, 78: 490-494. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01425.x.
Erkko H, Xia B, Nikkilä J, Schleutker J, Syrjäkoski K, Mannermaa A, Kallioniemi A, Pylkäs K, Karppinen SM, Rapakko K, Miron A, Sheng Q, Li G, Mattila H, Bell DW, Haber DA, Grip M, Reiman M, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Mustonen A, Kere J, Aaltonen LA, Kosma VM, Kataja V, Soini Y, Drapkin RI, Livingston DM, Winqvist R: A recurrent mutation in PALB2 in Finnish cancer families. Nature. 2007, 446: 316-319. 10.1038/nature05609.
Erkko H, Dowty JG, Nikkilä J, Syrjäkoski K, Mannermaa A, Pylkäs K, Southey MC, Holli K, Kallioniemi A, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Xia B, Livingston DM, Winqvist R, Hopper JL: Penetrance analysis of the PALB2 c.1592delT founder mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 4667-4671. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0210.
Heikkinen T, Kärkkäinen H, Aaltonen K, Milne RL, Heikkilä P, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H: The breast cancer susceptibility mutation PALB2 1592delT is associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 3214-3222. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3128.
Allain DC: Genetic counseling and testing for common hereditary breast cancer syndromes: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2008, 10: 383-395. 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070161.
Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K: MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008, 9: 299-306. 10.1093/bib/bbn017.
Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000, 132: 365-386.
Eerola H, Heikkilä P, Tamminen A, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H: Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: R93-R100. 10.1186/bcr953.
Southey MC, Teo ZL, Dowty JG, Odefrey FA, Park DJ, Tischkowitz M, Sabbaghian N, Apicella C, Byrnes GB, Winship I, Confab K, Baglietto L, Giles GG, Goldgar D, Foulkes WD, Hopper JL, Cancer Family Registry B: A PALB2 mutation associated with high risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12: R109-10.1186/bcr2796.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/14/82/prepub
We thank all the patients for their participation into this study. Also the help from Aki Mustonen, Riikka Keski-Filppula, Outi Kajula, Outi Jääskeläinen, Kiril Lahtinen and Ilkka Hanski at the Oulu University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics as well as from Saija Kauppila at the Department of Pathology is greatly appreciated. Special thanks goes to Meeri Otsukka for skilful technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Oulu University Hospital, the University of Oulu, the National Graduate School of Clinical Investigation, the Finnish Cancer Society, and the Finnish Cultural Foundation North Ostrobothnia Regional fund.
The authors declared that they have no competing interest.
MH, KP, JSM and RW conceived and designed the study. MH and KP carried out the data analysis. MH performed the genetic counseling and drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.