Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Lack of association between a functional variant of the BRCA-1 related associated protein (BRAP) gene and ischemic stroke

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics201314:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-14-17

  • Received: 7 June 2012
  • Accepted: 22 January 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Atherosclerosis shares common pathogenic features with myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke. BRCA-1 associated protein (BRAP), a newly identified risk gene for MI, aggravates the inflammatory response in atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to test the association between the BRAP gene and stroke in a Taiwanese population.

Methods

A total of 1,074 stroke patients and 1,936 controls were genotyped for the functional SNP rs11066001. In our previous studies, the rare allele of this SNP has been repeatedly shown to exert a recessive effect. Therefore, in the current study, we tested for the same recessive model. First, the genotype distributions between all the controls and all the stroke cases were compared. Then to reduce heterogeneity, we explored several population subsets by selecting young stroke subjects (using 45 years of age as the cutoff point), age- and sex-comparable controls, plaque-free controls, and stroke subtypes.

Results

We did not find any significant association for the entire data set (OR = 0.94, p = 0.74) or for the subset analyses using age- and sex-comparable controls (p = 0.70) and plaque-free controls (p = 0.91). Analyses of the four stroke subtypes also failed to show any significant associations (p = 0.42 – 0.98). For both young and old subjects, the GG genotype of rs11066001 was similar in the stroke cases and unmatched controls (8.1% vs. 9.4% in young subjects and 8.0% vs. 7.8% in old subjects). Comparing stroke cases with plaque-free controls also failed to find any significant association.

Conclusions

The BRAP polymorphism may not play an important role in ischemic stroke in the studied population.

Keywords

  • BRAP
  • Polymorphism
  • Cerebral infarction
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Young stroke

Background

Stroke is a multifactorial disease attributable to both genetic and environmental factors. Twin and family studies suggest that genetic background plays a substantial role in stroke susceptibility [1, 2]. A family history of stroke is associated with a higher risk for stroke with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.3 [1]. A family history of myocardial infarction (MI) is also associated with an increased risk for stroke, especially for large artery stroke [3]. These findings imply that these two diseases may have certain genetic or environmental risk factors in common. For example, the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and the methyl-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genes confer risks for both stroke and MI [46]. The 9p21 locus was first found to be associated with MI and later, a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies found that the same locus was related with large artery stroke [7].

Recently, the BRCA-1 associated protein (BRAP) gene was identified as a susceptible gene for MI [8]. The rare GG homozygote of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs11066001 in the BRAP gene was found to be associated with a 1.31- to 1.47-fold risk for MI in Chinese and Japanese populations [8]. SNP rs11066001 has also been shown to be related to coronary artery disease (CAD) [911], ankle-brachial index [12, 13] and carotid atherosclerosis [14]. In vitro studies showed that the G allele of SNP rs11066001 had an elevated BRAP expression, which exaggerated the activity of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) [8]. NF-κB is considered to be the “master regulator” of inflammatory cascades. Our recent study demonstrated that BRAP could enhance NF-κB nuclear translocation and subsequently initiated the transcription of inflammatory cytokines [14]. Because atherosclerosis can be caused by a chronic inflammatory condition, BRAP might play a role in the occurrence of ischemic stroke.

The heterogeneous entity of stroke poses challenges in identifying its genetic determinants. Focusing on individual stroke subtypes or studying intermediate phenotypes might help to reduce the complexity of the problem. Twin studies showed that the heritability of stroke was different across stroke subtypes and cardio-embolic stroke was found to be the least heritable [2, 15]. Besides, the genetic influence on stroke susceptibility may decrease with increasing age [15]. Jerrard-Dunne and coworkers found that a positive family history of stroke carried an OR of 4.46 for having a stroke by the age of 55 years, an OR of 2.34 by 65 years, and an OR of 1.88 by 75 years [16]. This data implied that studying the role of a candidate gene in young stroke patients may provide a better chance of elucidating the genetic effect of the gene. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether BRAP confers a risk for stroke in a Taiwanese population. Polymorphism rs11066001 was selected because it is a functional locus that affects the transcription of BRAP[14], and rs11066001 has also been shown to have the strongest association with MI risk [8]. We performed subgroup analysis by stroke subtype and by stroke onset age. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect of BRAP on the risk for stroke.

Methods

Study subjects

A total of 1,074 patients with ischemic stroke were enrolled from the Kaohsiung Medical University affiliated Hospitals and the Taichung Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan. All stroke patients were examined using brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis of ischemic stroke [17]. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, cerebral vein thrombosis, or past histories of MI were excluded. The stroke subtypes were classified using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) [18]. For the control group, 1,936 stroke- and MI-free volunteers were recruited at the Kaohsiung Medical University affiliated Hospitals through an advertisement soliciting volunteers. All of the study participants were Han Chinese residing in Taiwan.

For both the stroke cases and control subjects, socio-demographic information and their medical history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, stroke, MI, and cigarette smoking were obtained. Body height and weight were measured for the calculation of body mass index (BMI). For the control subjects, blood pressure was measured using a calibrated standard aneroid sphygmomanometer (Omron; Vernon Hills, Illinois) after sitting for at least 5 min and the average value from two measurements was used. For the case subjects, blood pressure was measured daily during hospitalization and the mean of two measurements was used. Subjects were deemed to have hypertension if the systolic blood pressure was ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic pressure was ≥90 mm Hg, or if they were taking anti-hypertensive medications. Subjects were regarded as having diabetes if the fasting blood glucose was ≥126 mg/dl, or if they were taking hypoglycemic medications. Hyperlipidemia was defined by total cholesterol (TC) serum levels ≥ 200 mg/dl. Overnight fasting venous blood was collected for biochemical analyses and extraction of genomic DNA. Serum levels of fasting blood sugar, TC, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and triglyceride were determined using standardized enzymatic procedures (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). The investigation conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All study protocols were approved by local Institutional Review Boards (KMUH-IRB-950055, KMUH-IRB-980194 and VGHTC-IRB-C09067), and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Carotid plaque and plaque-free subjects

All control subjects received carotid ultrasonic examinations for plaque detection; however, carotid plaque data was available only for a limited number of stroke cases. The Philips HD 11 ultrasonography system equipped with a 7.5 Hz to 10 Hz transducer (Philips Medical Systems, Washington, USA) was used. Carotid plaque was defined as an area of focal protrusion into the lumen that was at least 50% greater than the surrounding wall thickness. Control subjects were divided into two groups: (1) plaque-free subjects having no detectable plaque in the common carotid artery (CCA), carotid bifurcation (Bif), and internal carotid artery (ICA) on both sides of the body; and (2) plaque-prone subjects having at least one plaque in any of the six segments described above.

DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from the whole blood using a Puregene kit according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Gentra, Research Triangle, NC). Genotyping of BRAP rs11066001 was conducted using the TaqMan genotyping assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Briefly, PCR primers and two allelic-specific probes were designed to detect the specific SNP target. The PCR reactions were performed in 96-well microplates with an ABI 7500 real-time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Allele discrimination was achieved by detecting fluorescence using the ABI 7500 System SDS software version 1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems). The genotyping success rates were 96.4% in the control samples and 97.0% in the case samples.

Statistical analysis

The genotype distribution was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using the goodness-of-fit test. In our previous association studies based on a Chinese population residing in Taiwan [7, 8, 12, 13], the rare G allele of rs11066001 was found to exert a recessive effect on risk of stroke. Therefore, we focused our analyses on the recessive model of inheritance (GG genotype vs. AA+AG genotypes). Multivariate regression analysis with adjustment of traditional risk factors (including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) was used to evaluate the genetic effect of the risk genotype. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS statistical software (version 13.0). An additional analysis based on the generalized odds ratio (ORG) was also performed. The ORG is a model free approach without the assumption of any inheritance mode that uses the complete genotype distribution to estimate the magnitude of association between disease status and genotype [19]. The ORG and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using ORGGASMA software (available at http://biomath.med.uth.gr). Because we tested for five phenotypes (overall stroke and four stroke subtypes), a p-value of <0.01 was considered as statistically significant.

Several different case–control studies were explored, first be using all the study subjects, and then by selecting subgroups of the stroke subjects, including young stroke subjects. In addition, several strategies were used to select controls, first including all the controls, then using age- and sex-comparable controls, and plaque-free controls. First, we compared the genotype distribution between all the cases and all the controls. Cases were then stratified by stroke subtypes according to the TOAST classification [18]. Each stroke subtype was compared to all the controls using multivariate regression analysis as described above.

Because rs11066001 was associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in our previous study [14], we chose a subgroup of plaque-free controls to serve as the “super-normal controls”. Genotype distribution was compared between all the cases and the plaque-free controls, and between each stroke subtype and the plaque-free controls. Because the genetic effect might be more prominent in young stroke patients, we also stratified the participants into younger subjects (age ≤45 years) and older subjects (age >45 years).

In addition, we selected subsets of age- and sex-comparable controls to eliminate the concern of a diverse age-and sex-distribution between cases and controls. Because the age of the stroke subjects ranged from 20 to 89 years, control subjects <20 or >90 years of age were excluded. To reduce age differences between the control and case subjects, we used a table of random numbers to remove control subjects between 20 and 50 years of age; all the stroke cases were retained until the age effect was no longer significant between cases and controls. To minimize the sex effect, we repeated the above procedure for men and women separately. Because men accounted for approximately two thirds of stroke cases, we removed a greater proportion of female controls than male controls; in particular, we deleted three female controls to one female case but only one male control to one male case was removed. The random numbers tables were generated by the SPSS software. After removing 830 of the controls, the age and sex data was similar between the two groups. We then performed multivariate regression analysis to compare the genotype distribution between all the cases and the age- and sex-comparable control group with adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors (including diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking).

Results

The genotype distribution of SNP rs11066001 was in HWE. The demographic features of the study participants are shown in Table 1. According to the TOAST classification, 247 cases (23.0%) were large-artery atherosclerosis, 118 were cardio-embolic infarct (11.0%), 457 were small-vessel occlusion (42.6%) and 252 were either other determined or undetermined etiologies (23.5%). Among the 1,936 controls, 1,283 were plaque free. A subset of 1,106 controls was selected to reduce the diverse age- and sex-distribution between cases and controls. The genotype distributions between all the controls, the age- and sex-comparable controls, and the plaque-free controls were very similar (Table 2).
Table 1

Demographic data of the study participants

 

Cases

Controls (All = 1936)

Mean ± SD or%

All stroke cases (N=1074)

Age- and sex-comparable (N= 1106)

Plaque-free (N = 1283)

Plaque-prone (N = 653)

Age (yr)

63.1 ± 11.5

62.3 ± 8.9

52.9 ± 10.1*

59.6 ± 9.8*

Male

703 (65.5%)

715 (64.6%)

476 (37.1%)*

315 (48.2%)*

Hypertension

727 (76.3%)

475 (43.1%)*

337 (26.3%)*

275 (42.2%)*

Diabetes

445 (46.7%)

176 (16.0%)*

102 (8.0%)*

109 (16.7%)*

Hypercholesterolemia

469 (43.7%)

648 (58.6%)*

722 (56.3%)*

426 (65.3%)*

Current or former smoker

460 (43.0%)

266 (24.4%)*

209 (16.4%)*

148 (22.9%)*

Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)

4.9 ± 1.1

5.2 ± 1.0 *

5.2 ± 0.9 *

5.3 ± 1.1*

HDL- Cholesterol (mmol/L)

1.1 ± 0.3

1.4 ± 0.3*

1.5 ± 0.4*

1.4 ± 0.4*

Triglyceride (mmol/L)

1.8 ± 1.7

1.5 ± 0.9*

1.4 ± 0.9*

1.5 ± 0.9*

Fasting blood sugar (mmol/L)

7.5 ± 3.7

5.7 ± 1.5*

5.5 ± 1.2*

5.8 ± 1.7*

Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.4 ± 3.8

24.8 ± 3.3*

24.4 ± 3.6*

24.7 ± 3.3*

* p < 0.05 in comparison to stroke cases using Chi-squared test or Student’s t test.

Table 2

The association between BRAP rs11066001 and stroke

 

rs11066001 genotype

Recessive effect* (OR, Adjusted p value)

AA

AG

GG

age- and sex-comparable

Plaque-free

All

Stroke

All stroke cases (N = 1074)

571 (54.8%)

388 (37.2%)

83 (8.0%)

1.08, p = 0.70

0.97, p = 0.91

0.94, p = 0.74

Stroke Subtypes

      

 Large artery atherosclerosis (N=247)

132 (54.8%)

93 (38.6%)

16 (6.6%)

1.01, p = 0.98

0.82, p = 0.64

0.81, p = 0.56

 Cardio-embolism (N = 118)

62 (53.9%)

44 (38.3%)

9 (7.8%)

0.85, p = 0.71

0.70, p = 0.48

0.73, p = 0.50

 Small vessels occlusion (N=457)

246 (55.5%)

162 (36.6%)

35 (7.9%)

1.24, p = 0.42

1.05, p = 0.86

1.01, p = 0.97

 Other etiologies (N=252)

131 (53.9%)

89 (36.6%)

23 (9.5%)

1.26, p = 0.43

1.05, p = 0.87

1.09, p = 0.77

Controls

age- and sex-comparable controls (N = 1106)

529 (49.5%)

458 (42.9%)

81 (7.6%)

ref.

--

--

 

Plaque-free controls (N = 1283)

619 (50.4%)

518 (42.2%)

90 (7.3%)

--

ref.

--

 

All controls (N = 1936)

929 (49.8%)

787 (42.2%)

150 (8.0%)

--

--

ref.

Adjusted p value was obtained from logistic regression with adjustment for traditional risk factors (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking).

We did not find any association between BRAP SNP rs11066001 and the group with all the stroke cases using any of the three control groups (the entire group, the age- and sex-comparable control group, and the plaque-free group) (Table 2). The frequencies of the AA, AG and GG genotypes were 54.8%, 37.2% and 8.0% in stroke patients and 49.8%, 42.2%, and 8.0% in the group with all the controls. Compared to the (AA + AG) group, the GG genotype group had no increased risk for stroke. The ORG was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.97) from the ORGGASMA analysis for the comparison between the groups with all the stroke cases and all the controls (Additional file 1). However, the significance disappeared after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors using multivariate regression analysis (OR = 0.94, p = 0.74). A similar analyses for the four stroke subtypes against the group with all the controls also failed to find any significant associations (p = 0.50 – 0.97, Table 2).

When the stroke patients were compared with the subset of age- and sex-comparable controls, the genotype distribution of rs11066001 was similar between the two groups. The frequencies of GG genotype were 8.0% in the group with all the stroke patients and 7.6% in the age- and sex-comparable control group (Table 2). Compared to the (AA + AG) genotype, the GG genotype did not increase the risk for overall stroke (OR = 1.08, p = 0.70). Analyses of the four stroke subtype groups also failed to show any significant associations (p = 0.42 – 0.98, Table 2). However, the level of the genetic effect of rs11066001 appeared to differ among the stroke subtypes. Compared to patients with AA or AG genotypes, patients with the GG genotype had the highest risk for small vessel occlusion (OR = 1.24), followed by large artery atherosclerosis (OR = 1.01), and the GG genotype did not increase the risk for cardio-embolic infarct (OR = 0.85), although none of these results reached significant levels.

Similar to the previous analyses, when we used plaque-free controls to evaluate the genetic effect of rs11066001 we failed to find any significant association between rs11066001 and stroke (OR = 0.97, p = 0.91, Table 2). The frequencies of the GG genotype were similar between the group with all cases and the plaque-free control group (8.0% vs. 7.3%, Table 2). The generalized odds ratio model also failed to find a significant result (ORG = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-1.02), Additional file 1). Analyses of the groups with the four stroke subtypes yielded negative results (p = 0.48 – 0.87, Table 2).

To find out if the genetic effect might be more evident in young stroke patients, we stratified the subjects into under 45 years and over 45 years age groups. For both the younger and older subjects, the GG genotype of rs11066001 did not differ between stroke cases and the unmatched controls (8.1% vs. 9.4% in the younger subjects; 8.0% vs. 7.8% in the older subjects, Table 3). When the stroke cases were compared with the plaque-free controls, no significant association was found.
Table 3

Stratification analysis

Subgroup

Younger subjects (age <= 45 y/o)

Older subjects (age > 45 y/o)

AA + AG

GG

OR, adjusted p value

AA + AG

GG

OR, adjusted p value

Stroke cases

68 (91.9%)

6 (8.1%)

OR = 0.73,

OR = 0.71,

891 (92.0%)

77 (8.0%)

OR = 0.94,

OR = 0.99,

p = 0.60

p = 0.58

p = 0.74

p = 0.96

Unselected controls

269 (90.6%)

28 (9.4%)

ref.

--

1447 (92.2%)

122 (7.8%)

ref.

--

Plaque-free controls

237 (91.2%)

23 (8.8%)

--

ref.

900 (93.1%)

67 (6.9%)

--

ref.

Adjusted p value was obtained from logistic regression with adjustment for traditional risk factors (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking).

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the possible association between the genotypes of BRAP SNP rs11066001 and ischemic stroke in a Taiwanese population. Although several strategies were used to categorize cases and controls into relevant subgroups, none of our analyses showed any evidence of a significant association between the SNP and stroke. According to our previous study [8], SNP rs11066001 was associated with an OR of 1.31 for MI in a Chinese population. Using the Genetic Power Calculator (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/gpc/) estimation [20], our sample size for all the cases and controls provided a power of 74% for an OR of 1.31 and 98% for an OR of 1.50 with an alpha level of 0.05. Therefore, we concluded that SNP rs11066001 in the BRAP gene was unlikely to play an important role in stroke susceptibility in the Chinese population.

Previously, we reported that BRAP can modulate NF-κB activity [14] which in turn initiates the transcription of downstream inflammatory genes. We also found that BRAP may influence the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells [14]. Inflammation is an important element in stroke pathophysiology. Previous studies have shown that elevated high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels are associated with a 1.27-fold risk for ischemic stroke [21]. Several inflammatory genes, like interleukin-6 (IL-6) [22, 23], tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [24, 25] and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) [25, 26], were also found to confer risks for stroke. The above evidence justifies our effort to test for an association between BRAP polymorphisms and ischemic stroke.

SNP rs11066001 in the BRAP gene has been shown to be significantly associated with MI/CAD [8, 9, 11], carotid plaques [14] and Ankle-Brachial index (ABI) [12, 13]. These associations imply that its genetic effect might be more evident in large artery atherosclerosis. However, we acknowledge that the sample size used in this study might be underpowered to detect a modest genetic effect on this stroke subtype. For large artery stroke, our sample size only provides a power of 33% for an OR of 1.31 and 71% for an OR of 1.50 with an alpha level of 0.05. MI is the clinical outcome of systemic atherosclerosis, while stroke is attributed to a more heterogeneous pathogenesis [27]. Therefore, a discrepant genetic effect between MI and stroke is not uncommon [28, 29]. For example, a meta-analysis for 11 MI risk genes identified from genome-wide association studies found that none of the 11 genes increased the risk for ischemic stroke [28].

The search for stroke susceptibility genes has been extremely challenging. Previous studies related to risk genes for stroke yielded inconsistent results. Two widely investigated genes, phosphodiesterase 4 D (PDE4D) and lipoxygenase-activating protein (ALOX5AP), have never been confirmed in meta-analyses of stroke [30, 31]. The complexity of stroke entities is considered to be one of the major causes for this. Large-artery stroke shares pathogenesis and risk factors with systemic atherosclerosis, including CAD and peripheral artery disease (PAD) [27, 32]. On the other hand, small-vessel occlusion is caused by leukoaraiosis secondary to hypertension. When we tried to analyze the stroke subtypes, we encountered the problem of lack of power. Therefore, whether or not BRAP SNP rs11066001 can influence a particular type of stroke needs further investigation.

Susceptibility genes may have a more prominent influence on early-onset of the disease when environmental and behavioral factors have not yet had sufficient time to modify the phenotype. Age-dependent effects have been reported for PDE4D genes [33], variants at chromosome 9p21 [34, 35], MTHFR and apolipoprotein E(APOE) genes [36]. Although we only had 74 young stroke cases in our study population, the genotype distributions between the younger and older stroke cases (ages less than and greater than 45 years respectively) were essentially identical. Therefore, we propose that age is unlikely to modify the relationship between BRAP gene and stroke.

The associations between BRAP and vascular diseases were intriguing. BRAP polymorphisms have been related to metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population [37], MI/CAD in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese populations [911], and ABI and carotid atherosclerosis in a Taiwanese population [1214]. Only one report showed that a BRAP polymorphism was associated with metabolic syndrome in European American and African American populations [38]. It is unclear whether findings from the BRAP SNP studies can be generalized to non-Asian populations.

Conclusions

In the present study, we failed to find any significant association between BRAP SNP rs11066001 and stroke in a Taiwanese population. Although our previous functional studies demonstrated a role of BRAP in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and previous genetic association studies supported the role of BRAP polymorphisms in systemic atherosclerosis (CAD and PAD), our current results suggest that BRAP does not play a critical role for stroke. However, further large-scale studies to explore the role of BRAP in stroke subtypes are needed.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following funding: National Science Council (Taiwan, R.O.C. NSC 100-2923-B-037-001-MY3 and 100-2314-B-075A-006), National Health Research Institutes (Taiwan, R.O.C. NHRI-Ex101-10107PI), Academia Sinica (BM101100888), Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital intramural grants (KMUH98-8I11 and KMUH100-0 M31), and Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH-1013402C and TCVGH-1003404C).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Section of Neurology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 160, Sec 3, Chung-Kang Rd, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Medical Genetics, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, TzYou First Road, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan
(3)
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, TzYou First Road, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan
(4)
Department of Neurology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, No.155, Sec.2, 1471-2350-14-17, Linong Street, Taipei, 11221, Taiwan
(5)
Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, TzYou First Road, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan
(6)
Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, TzYou First Road, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan
(7)
Department of Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, No. 135, Nanxiao St, Changhua, 500, Taiwan
(8)
Department of Neurology, Yuan-Sheng Hospital, No.359, Juguang Rd, Changhua, 510, Taiwan

References

  1. Flossmann E, Schulz UG, Rothwell PM: Systematic review of methods and results of studies of the genetic epidemiology of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004, 35: 212-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bak S, Gaist D, Sindrup SH, Skytthe A, Christensen K: Genetic liability in stroke: a long-term follow-up study of Danish twins. Stroke. 2002, 33: 769-774. 10.1161/hs0302.103619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schulz UG, Flossmann E, Rothwell PM: Heritability of ischemic stroke in relation to age, vascular risk factors, and subtypes of incident stroke in population-based studies. Stroke. 2004, 35: 819-824. 10.1161/01.STR.0000121646.23955.0f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley P, Peck G, Smeeth L, Whittaker J, Sharma P: Causal relationship of susceptibility genes to ischemic stroke: comparison to ischemic heart disease and biochemical determinants. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e9136-10.1371/journal.pone.0009136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Marian AJ: Genetic risk factors for myocardial infarction. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1998, 13: 171-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariyaratnam R, Casas JP, Whittaker J, Smeeth L, Hingorani AD, Sharma P: Genetics of ischaemic stroke among persons of non-European descent: a meta-analysis of eight genes involving approximately 32,500 individuals. PLoS Med. 2007, 4: e131-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Traylor M, Farrall M, Holliday EG, Sudlow C, Hopewell JC, Cheng YC, Fornage M, Ikram MA, Malik R, Bevan S, et al: Genetic risk factors for ischaemic stroke and its subtypes (the METASTROKE Collaboration): a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 2012, 11: 951-962. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70234-X.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ozaki K, Sato H, Inoue K, Tsunoda T, Sakata Y, Mizuno H, Lin TH, Miyamoto Y, Aoki A, Onouchi Y, et al: SNPs in BRAP associated with risk of myocardial infarction in Asian populations. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 329-333. 10.1038/ng.326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsu PC, Lin TH, Su HM, Juo SH, Lai WT, Sheu SH: Synergistic effect between BRAP polymorphism and diabetes on the extent of coronary atherosclerosis in the Chinese population. Cardiology. 2011, 120: 3-8. 10.1159/000332592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Takeuchi F, Yokota M, Yamamoto K, Nakashima E, Katsuya T, Asano H, Isono M, Nabika T, Sugiyama T, Fujioka A, et al: Genome-wide association study of coronary artery disease in the Japanese. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012, 20: 333-340. 10.1038/ejhg.2011.184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinohara K, Ohtani H, Nakajima T, Sasaoka T, Sawabe M, Lee BS, Ban J, Park JE, Izumi T, Kimura A: Validation of eight genetic risk factors in East Asian populations replicated the association of BRAP with coronary artery disease. J Hum Genet. 2009, 54: 642-646. 10.1038/jhg.2009.87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsai PC, Liao YC, Lin TH, Hsi E, Yang YH, Juo SH: Additive effect of ANRIL and BRAP polymorphisms on Ankle-Brachial index in a Taiwanese population. Circ J. 2012, 76: 446-452. 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsai PC, Lin TH, Hsu PC, Wang YS, Liao YC, Juo SH: Polymorphism of 270 A > G in BRAP is associated with lower Ankle-Brachial index in a Taiwanese population. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011, 18: 413-420. 10.5551/jat.7468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao YC, Wang YS, Guo YC, Ozaki K, Tanaka T, Lin HF, Chang MH, Chen KC, Yu ML, Sheu SH, Juo SH: BRAP activates inflammatory cascades and increases the risk for carotid atherosclerosis. Mol Med. 2011, 17: 1065-1074.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Meschia JF: Clinically translated ischemic stroke genomics. Stroke. 2004, 35: 2735-2739. 10.1161/01.STR.0000143156.32467.fd.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jerrard-Dunne P, Cloud G, Hassan A, Markus HS: Evaluating the genetic component of ischemic stroke subtypes: a family history study. Stroke. 2003, 34: 1364-1369. 10.1161/01.STR.0000069723.17984.FD.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators: The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988, 41: 105-114. 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90084-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993, 24: 35-41. 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zintzaras E: The generalized odds ratio as a measure of genetic risk effect in the analysis and meta-analysis of association studies. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2010, 9: Article21-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC: Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 149-150. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chei CL, Yamagishi K, Kitamura A, Kiyama M, Imano H, Ohira T, Cui R, Tanigawa T, Sankai T, Ishikawa Y, et al: C-reactive protein levels and risk of stroke and its subtype in Japanese: The Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS). Atherosclerosis. 2011, 217: 187-193. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Greisenegger S, Endler G, Haering D, Schillinger M, Lang W, Lalouschek W, Mannhalter C: The (−174) G/C polymorphism in the interleukin-6 gene is associated with the severity of acute cerebrovascular events. Thromb Res. 2003, 110: 181-186. 10.1016/S0049-3848(03)00376-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pola R, Flex A, Gaetani E, Flore R, Serricchio M, Pola P: Synergistic effect of −174 G/C polymorphism of the interleukin-6 gene promoter and 469 E/K polymorphism of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 gene in Italian patients with history of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003, 34: 881-885. 10.1161/01.STR.0000062346.70983.DF.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pereira TV, Rudnicki M, Franco RF, Pereira AC, Krieger JE: Effect of the G-308A polymorphism of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene on the risk of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2007, 153: 821-830. 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Munshi A, Rajeshwar K, Kaul S, Al-Hazzani A, Alshatwi AA, Shafi G, Balakrishna N, Jyothy A: Association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene variants with stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2011, 18: 1053-1059. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03334.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan RC, Smith NL, Zucker S, Heckbert SR, Rice K, Psaty BM: Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3) and MMP9 genes and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 201: 130-137. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.01.003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Markus HS: Stroke genetics. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20: R124-R131. 10.1093/hmg/ddr345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cheng YC, Anderson CD, Bione S, Keene K, Maguire JM, Nalls M, Rasheed A, Zeginigg M, Attia J, Baker R, et al: Are myocardial infarction–associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ischemic stroke?. Stroke. 2012, 43: 980-986. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632075.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamada Y: Identification of genetic factors and development of genetic risk diagnosis systems for cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Circ J. 2006, 70: 1240-1248. 10.1253/circj.70.1240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zintzaras E, Rodopoulou P, Sakellaridis N: Variants of the arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (ALOX5AP) gene and risk of stroke: a HuGE gene-disease association review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 169: 523-532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bevan S, Dichgans M, Gschwendtner A, Kuhlenbaumer G, Ringelstein EB, Markus HS: Variation in the PDE4D gene and ischemic stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 5200 cases and 6600 controls. Stroke. 2008, 39: 1966-1971. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509992.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, Donnan GA, Hennerici MG: Classification of stroke subtypes. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009, 27: 493-501. 10.1159/000210432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin HF, Liao YC, Liou CW, Liu CK, Juo SH: The phosphodiesterase 4D gene for early onset ischemic stroke among normotensive patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2007, 5: 436-438. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02350.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Olsson S, Jood K, Blomstrand C, Jern C: Genetic variation on chromosome 9p21 shows association with the ischaemic stroke subtype large-vessel disease in a Swedish sample aged </= 70. Eur J Neurol. 2011, 18: 365-367. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03096.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin HF, Tsai PC, Liao YC, Lin TH, Tai CT, Juo SH, Lin RT: Chromosome 9p21 genetic variants are associated with myocardial infarction but not with ischemic stroke in a Taiwanese population. J Investig Med. 2011, 59: 926-930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Xin XY, Song YY, Ma JF, Fan CN, Ding JQ, Yang GY, Chen SD: Gene polymorphisms and risk of adult early-onset ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2009, 124: 619-624. 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu L, Xi B, Hou D, Zhao X, Liu J, Cheng H, Shen Y, Wang X, Mi J: The single nucleotide polymorphisms in BRAP decrease the risk of metabolic syndrome in a Chinese young adult population. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2012, Epub adhead of printGoogle Scholar
  38. Avery CL, He Q, North KE, Ambite JL, Boerwinkle E, Fornage M, Hindorff LA, Kooperberg C, Meigs JB, Pankow JS, et al: A phenomics-based strategy identifies loci on APOC1, BRAP, and PLCG1 associated with metabolic syndrome phenotype domains. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1002322-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002322.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/14/17/prepub

Copyright

Advertisement