This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Familial hypercholesterolemia mutations in Petrozavodsk: no similarity to St. Petersburg mutation spectrum
- Tatiana Yu Komarova†1,
- Victoria A Korneva†2,
- Tatiana Yu Kuznetsova2,
- Alexandra S Golovina1, 3,
- Vadim B Vasilyev1 and
- Michail Yu Mandelshtam1, 3Email author
© Komarova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 25 March 2013
Accepted: 19 December 2013
Published: 27 December 2013
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a human monogenic disease induced by a variety of mutations with striking genetic diversity. Despite this variability recurrent mutations occur in each population studied, which allows both elucidating prevalent mutations and developing DNA diagnostic tools for the disease. Recent research of FH in St. Petersburg, Moscow and Novosibirsk (major cities in Russia) demonstrates that each megapolis has its own FH mutation spectrum sharing only small part of mutations with other populations in Russia and Europe. In order to optimize molecular-genetic diagnostic protocols for FH in Russia we studied mutation spectrum in other regions including Petrozavodsk, a smaller town in relatively close proximity to St. Petersburg.
The principal method was automated detection of single-strand conformation polymorphism followed by direct PCR amplified DNA sequencing.
Twelve different mutations of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene were detected in the Petrozavodsk sample (80 patients). Out of these twelve mutations, seven have never been described before (c.192_201delinsGGACTTCA, c. 195_196insT, c. 618 T > G, c. 1340C > G, c. 1686_1693delinsT, c. 1936C > A, c. 2191delG). Other five mutations (c. 58G > A, c. 925_931del, c. 1194C > T, c. 1532 T > C, c. 1920C > T) were previously characterized elsewhere. All new mutations are considered to be a probable cause of the FH in their carriers. Direct evidence of the neutral character of c.58G > A or p. (Gly20Arg) is provided for the first time. Each pathogenic mutation was a trait of its own unique pedigree and so far has not been found in other patients.
Strikingly, out of twelve mutations characterized in the Petrozavodsk sample only one mutation, c. 925_931del, has previously been found in patients from St. Petersburg and Finland (most closely located studied populations), suggesting some common roots in origin of these populations in the past or limited gene exchange between them nowadays. No recurrent mutations were detected.
Familial hypercholesterolemia is a dominant inborn error of metabolism due to LDL lowered catabolism via specific LDL receptor. The disease is quite common (1:500) and can be diagnosed by detection of mutations in LDL receptor gene . More than a thousand different mutations have been characterized in Europe [2–6], their spectra demonstrating ethnic specificity as well as importance of the founder effect. In Russia only patients from three cities: St. Petersburg , Moscow  and Novosibirsk , were studied showing high heterogeneity of the disease within the country. In order to search for ethnic mutations and to improve the DNA diagnostics of FH we carried out the mutation spectra characterization in the city of Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russia.
We collected DNA samples from 80 hypercholesterolemic patients from Petrozavodsk city demonstrating at least two of the following parameters: (1) positive family history of hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease; (2) high serum cholesterol, usually higher than 8 mM; (3) the presence of stigmata as corneal arcus, tendon xanthomata or xanthelasma. All patients signed an informed consent for the study. Research was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved both by Petrozavodsk State University and Institute of Experimental Medicine ethics committees. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells nuclei using standard method with phenol-chloroform extractions [7, 10]. All exons and promoter of the LDL receptor gene were amplified in separate PCR with the help of Cy-5 labelled oligonucleotide primers as described  and subjected to SSCP analysis on ALFExpress DNA automated sequencer (Life Sciences). Gels were interpreted with the help of ALFWin DNA Fragment Analyzer program. Samples demonstrating shifted mobilities in SSCP analysis were gel-purified and sequenced by Sanger method on contract terms at Eurogen Co. (Moscow).
List of mutations and polymorphisms in the LDL receptor gene in Petrozavodsk FH sample and methods of their detection
Mutation, systematic name [name according to Yamamoto nomenclature] 
Rapid test method
Number of families (patients) with the mutation or rare allele frequency
p. (Gly20Arg) [=p. G(−2)R]
c.58 G > A
France, Austria, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Turkey, Croatia
p. (Ser206Arg) [=p.S185R]
c.618 T > G
p. (Ser447Cys) [=p. S426C]
c.1340C > G
p. (Leu511Ser) [=p. L490S]
c.1532 T > C
p. (Leu646Ile) [=p. L625I]
c.1936C > A
p. (Ser65Glyfs*64) [=FsS44:D108X]
p. (Val66Cysfs*64) [=FsV45:D108X]
p. (Pro309Lysfs*59) [=FsE287: V348X] (FH North Karelia)
Finland, Sweden, USA, St.Petersburg
p. (Trp562Cysfs*5) [=FsW541:L547X]
p. (Val731Serfs*6) [=FsV710:V715X]
Putative splice site mutations or neutral mutations
p. (Asn591=) [=p.N570N]
c. 1773C > T
USA, China, Morocco, etc.
p. (Ala391Thr) [=p. A370T]
c. 1171G > A
South Africa, England, France etc.
p. (Ile398=) [=p. I377I]
c.1194C > T
p. (Arg471=) [=p. R450R]
c.1413 G > A
South Africa, Japan, Russia, Morocco etc.
p. (Pro539=) [= p. P518P]
c.1617C > T
Morocco, China, Russia, etc.
p. (Asn640=) [=p. N619N]
p.1920C > T
Sse 9 I
p. (Val653=) [=p. V632V]
c.1959C > T
Asp S9 I
The Netherlands, USA, Russia, etc.
p. (Arg744=) [=p. R723R]
c.2232 G > A
Several novel mutant alleles that have been characterized in our study contain frameshifts, which results in occurrence of premature nonsense-codons (see Table 1). Besides detecting a well-characterized allele FH-North Karelia , a number of new mutations were identified in our study, including c.192_201delinsGGACTTCA (c.192del10/ins8), c.195_196insT, c.1686_1693del/insT (c.1686del8/insT) and c.2191delG. The deleterious character of these mutations seems likely since they cause a translation frameshift and formation of a premature termination codon (Table 1). Usual mechanism of action of a mutation introducing a premature codon is the nonsense-mediated decay of the corresponding transcript.
Of special interest, however, are missense-mutations that hamper the LDL receptor function. Analysis of these mutations (Additional file 3) by PROVEAN, PolyPhen, Mutation t@ster and SiftBlink gave somehow different predictions about pathogenicity of these missense mutations.
All of the methods agreed that p. (Gly20Arg) is a neutral variant. p. (Gly20Arg) mutation was first described among other disease-causing mutations by Amsellem et al.  in France and later reported from New Zealand , from the Netherlands , from Turkey  and from Austria . Despite that Gly-20 of the signal sequence is conserved in a number of animals, such as chimp, monkey, rat, rabbit and hamster, the most recent publications e.g.  consider it as a polymorphism. However, no segregation data were available and no direct functional analysis of the mutated protein was ever performed. In our sample p. (Gly20Arg) mutation was found in a genetic compound with very well characterized disease-causing mutation FH-North Karelia. Proband’s father carried only FH-North Karelia mutation and had quite typical atherogenic lipid plasma profile. In a reference patient p. (Gly20Arg) mutation was also present, but the profile was typical for heterozygous rather than homozygous FH. The mother of the genetic compound was not available for DNA analysis, but according to personal communication, she had no FH features. Therefore, these data are probably the first direct evidence that p. (Gly20Arg) mutation inherited by the proband from a healthy mother is a neutral non-FH causing variant.
Exact predictions regarding a function of the other missense mutations were not available using in silico analysis (Additional file 3). However, we believe that substitutions p. (Ser447Cys), p. (Leu646Ile), p. (Ser206Arg) and p. (Leu511Ser) resulted in the development of the FH phenotype. It’s important to note that p. (Ser447Cys) mutation introduces a novel cysteine residue, and it could affect specific Cys-Cys bonding in the EGF precursor homology domain of the LDL receptor. Another mutation, p. (Ser206Arg), introduces a large positively charged side chain into strongly conserved ligand-binding repeat 5 (LR5) of the receptor. Mutation p. (Leu646Ile) doesn’t change the charge of the receptor molecule, but it provides for the substitution of the short aliphatic chain by the branched analogue that potentially could result in misfolding of the receptor protein. Allele p. (Leu511Ser) has previously been classified as a pathogenic variant FH Rome-4 in an Italian patient .
There were several variants in the LDL receptor exons predicted to be silent mutations due to preservation of the codon sense. However, a synonymous variant p. (Asn591=) (c. 1773C > T, also known as rs688) was shown not only to direct alternative splicing of mRNA followed by enhanced nonsense-mediated decay, but also to reduce the uptake of fluorescently labeled LDLs by 25%. This polymorphism was associated with increased plasma total and LDL cholesterol in several populations and so far can’t be considered a neutral nucleotide substitution . However, p. (Asn591=) variant was found at a similar frequency in the St.Petersburg FH cohort and in the control group and thus unlikely is a disease-causing variant (M.Y. Mandelshtam, unpublished data).
No data suggesting functional role of other silent mutations have been published. This is also true for p.(Ala391Thr) (c.1171G > A variant), cited previously as p.A370T mutation or StuI RFLP [21–23]. A minor allele of this polymorphism was found in a number of populations including Russian population , and it was demonstrated in major studies to have no influence on plasma lipid levels or cardiovascular risk in UK men . Variant p.(Pro539=) (c. 1617C > T) was detected only once in St. Petersburg  among 80 FH probands and therefore, was regarded as a silent mutation. However, in the Petrozavodsk FH sample that rare allele occurs at a higher frequency (5%) and is further considered to be a DNA polymorphism. As shown in Table 1, p.(Pro539=) variation can be easily detected as AciI (=BspAC I) RFLP. In case of minor allele the restriction site is lost; the PCR-amplified exon 11 of the LDLR gene is not cut and looks as a single band of 169 bp.
Other silent variants of the LDL receptor gene were previously characterized as neutral and were not associated with the disease; this is true for c.1413G > A or p.(Arg471=) polymorphism in exon 10A known as BslFI RFLP [24, 25]), c.1959C > T transition or p.(Val653=) variant cited in many sources as AvaII RFLP or Sau 96 I RFLP, and c.2232G > A or p.(Arg744=) transition known as MspI RFLP . All these variants have been reported both for Caucasian and Chinese populations .
Considering epidemiology of FH in the Petrozavodsk population we can conclude that the FH cohort is very heterogeneous, showing no predominant FH-causing mutations. It seems that known mutations from Finnish population are only a rare cause of the disease in the Karelian FH sample; the same is true about the St. Petersburg FH collection . Because no founder effect was detected in the Karelian FH sample, the rationale for FH diagnostics dictates direct sequencing of the full coding region of the gene and exon/intron boundaries rather than testing for known mutations. Modern DNA sequencing technologies allow performing such analysis quickly and at a relatively low price.
This research was supported by the Grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no.10-04-00563 and 13-04-00902). The research was performed within the frames of the program “Strategical Development of Petrozavodsk State University”. Dr. Olga Potapova is thanked for improving the language of the paper. Special thanks are addressed to reviewers, Dr. Mathilde Varret and Dr. George Dedoussis for their critical comments that helped making the manuscript better.
- Goldstein JL, Hobbs HH, Brown MS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia. I. The metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. Volume III. Edited by: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D. 2001, New York: McGraw Hill, 2863-2914.Google Scholar
- Dedoussis GVZ, Schmidt H, Genschel J: LDL-receptor mutations in Europe. Hum Mutat. 2004, 24: 443-459. 10.1002/humu.20105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (Ldlr) Gene in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ldlr/Current/]
- Wilson DJ, Gahan M, Haddad L, Heath K, Whittall RA, Williams RR, Humphries SE, Day IN: A World Wide Web site for low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations in familial hypercholesterolemia: sequence-based, tabular, and direct submission data handling. Am J Cardiol. 1998, 81 (12): 1509-1511. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00215-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Universal Mutation Database. [http://www.umd.be/LDLR/]
- Villéger L, Abifadel M, Allard D, Rabès JP, Thiart R, Kotze MJ, Béroud C, Junien C, Boileau C, Varret M: The UMD-LDLR database: additions to the software and 490 new entries to the database. Hum Mutat. 2002, 20 (2): 81-87. 10.1002/humu.10102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zakharova FM, Damgaard D, Mandelshtam MY, Golubkov VI, Nissen PH, Nilson GG, Stenderup A, Lipovetsky BM, Konstantinov VO, Denisenko AD, Vasilyev VB, Faergeman O: Familial hypercholesterolemia in St.Petersburg: the known and novel mutations found in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene in Russia. BMC Med Genet. 2005, 6 ((1): 6-http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/6/6,View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meshkov AN, Stambol’skii DV, Krapivner SR, Bochkov VN, Kukharchuk VV, Malyshev PP: [Low density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations in patients with clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia]. Kardiologiia. 2004, 44: 58-61. [Article in Russian]PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voevoda MI, Kulikov IV, Shakhtshneider EV, Maksimov VN, Pilipenko IV, Tereschenko IP, Kobzev VF, Romaschenko AG, Nikitin YP: The spectrum of mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in the Russian population. Rus J Genet. 2008, 44 (10): 1191-1194. 10.1134/S1022795408100074. Translated from: Genetika. 44:1374–1378View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kunkel LM, Smith KD, Boyer SH, Borgaonkar DS, Wachtel SS, Miller OJ, Breg WR, Jones HW, Rary JM: Analysis of human Y-chromosome-specific reiterated DNA in chromosome variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74: 1245-1249. 10.1073/pnas.74.3.1245.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto T, Davis CG, Brown MS, Schneider WJ, Casey ML, Goldstein JL, Russell DW: The human LDL receptor: a cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequences in its mRNA. Cell. 1984, 39: 27-38. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koivisto UM, Turtola H, Aalto-Setälä K, Top B, Frants RR, Kovanen PT, Syvänen AC, Kontula K: The familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)-North Karelia mutation of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene deletes seven nucleotides of exon 6 and is a common cause of FH in Finland. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90 (1): 219-228. 10.1172/JCI115839.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Amsellem S, Briffaut D, Carrié A, Rabès JP, Girardet JP, Fredenrich A, Moulin P, Krempf M, Reznik Y, Vialettes B, de Gennes JL, Brukert E, Benlian P: Intronic mutations outside of Alu-repeat-rich domains of the LDL receptor gene are a cause of familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (6): 501-510. 10.1007/s00439-002-0813-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laurie AD, Scott RS, George PM: Genetic screening of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH): a New Zealand perspective. Atheroscler Suppl. 2004, 5 (5): 13-15. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2004.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fouchier SW, Kastelein JJ, Defesche JC: Update of the molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolemia in The Netherlands. Hum Mutat. 2005, 26 (6): 550-556. 10.1002/humu.20256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sözen MM, Whittall R, Oner C, Tokatli A, Kalkanoğlu HS, Dursun A, Coşkun T, Oner R, Humphries SE: The molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolaemia in Turkish patients. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 180 (1): 63-71. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.12.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Widhalm K, Dirisamer A, Lindemayr A, Kostner G: Diagnosis of families with familial hypercholesterolaemia and/or Apo B-100 defect by means of DNA analysis of LDL-receptor gene mutations. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007, 30 (2): 239-247. 10.1007/s10545-007-0563-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pećin I, Whittall R, Futema M, Sertić J, Reiner Ž, Leigh SEA, Humphries SE: Mutation detection in Croatian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Ann Hum Genet. 2013, 77 (1): 22-30. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2012.00735.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Familial hypercholesterolemia due to defects in the gene encoding the LDL receptor. Mutations Occurring in Italy and their Analysis. Edited by: Cantafora A, Prestinaci F, Blotta I. 2006, 90-Rapporti ISTISAN 06/23 [Article in Italian], iiGoogle Scholar
- Gao F, Ihn HE, Medina MW, Krauss RM: A common polymorphism in the LDL receptor gene has multiple effects on LDL receptor function. Hum Mol Genet. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Zakharova FM, Tatishcheva YA, Golubkov VI, Lipovetsky BM, Konstantinov VO, Denisenko AD, Faergeman O, Vasilyev VB, Mandelshtam MY: Familial hypercholesterolemia in St. Petersburg: diversity of mutations argues against a strong founder effect. Russ J Genet. 2007, 43 (9): 1046-1052. 10.1134/S1022795407090116. [Translated from Genetika 43: 1255–1262]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zakharova FM, Golubkov VI, Mandelshtam MJ, Lipovetskii BM, Gaitskhoki VS: Identification of novel missense mutation G571E, novel silent mutation H229H, nonsense mutation C74X, and four single nucleotide polymorphisms in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from St. Petersburg. Russ J Bioorg. Chem. 2001, 27 ((5): 349-351. [Translated from Bioorganicheskaya Khimiya, 27(5):393–396]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vieira JR, Whittall RA, Cooper JA, Miller GJ, Humphries SE: The A370T variant (StuI polymorphism) in the LDL receptor gene is not associated with plasma lipid levels or cardiovascular risk in UK men. Ann Hum Genet. 2006, 70 (Pt 6): 697-704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warnich L, Kotze MJ, Langenhoven E, Retief AE: Detection of a frequent polymorphism in exon 10 of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene. Hum Genet. 1992, 89 (3): 362-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatishcheva YA, Mandelshtam MY, Golubkov VI, Lipovetsky BM, Gaitskhoki VS: Four new mutations and two polymorphic variants of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia patients from St. Petersburg. Rus J Genet. 2001, 37: 1082-1086. 10.1023/A:1011973817437. Translated from Genetika37:1290–1295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giesel J, Weisshaar B, Oette K, Mechtel M, Doerfler W: Double Msp I RFLP in the human LDL receptor gene. Nucl Acids Res. 1987, 15: 3943-10.1093/nar/15.9.3943.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mak YT, Pang CP, Tomlinson B, Zhang J, Chan YS, Mak TW, Masarei JR: Mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in Chinese familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998, 18 (10): 1600-1605. 10.1161/01.ATV.18.10.1600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/14/128/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.