Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Medical Genetics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Novel quantitative trait locus is mapped to chromosome 12p11 for left ventricular mass in Dominican families: the Family Study of Stroke Risk and Carotid Atherosclerosis

  • Liyong Wang1,
  • Ashley Beecham1,
  • Marco R Di Tullio2,
  • Susan Slifer1,
  • Susan H Blanton1,
  • Tatjana Rundek3 and
  • Ralph L Sacco1, 3Email author
BMC Medical Genetics200910:74

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-74

Received: 09 March 2009

Accepted: 23 July 2009

Published: 23 July 2009

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular mass (LVM) is an important risk factor for stroke and vascular disease. The genetic basis of LVM is unclear although a high heritability has been suggested. We sought to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) for LVM using large Dominican families.

Methods

Probands were selected from Dominican subjects of the population-based Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS). LVM was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. A set of 405 microsatellite markers was used to screen the whole genome among 1360 subjects from 100 Dominican families who had complete phenotype data and DNA available. A polygenic covariate screening was run to identify the significant covariates. Variance components analysis was used to estimate heritability and to detect evidence for linkage, after adjusting for significant risk factors. Ordered-subset Analysis (OSA) was conducted to identify a more homogeneous subset for stratification analysis.

Results

LVM had a heritability of 0.58 in the studied population (p < 0.0001). The most significant evidence for linkage was found at chromosome 12p11 (MLOD = 3.11, empirical p = 0.0003) with peak marker at D12S1042. This linkage was significantly increased in a subset of families with the high average waist circumference (MLOD = 4.45, p = 0.0045 for increase in evidence for linkage).

Conclusion

We mapped a novel QTL near D12S1042 for LVM in Dominicans. Enhanced linkage evidence in families with larger waist circumference suggests that gene(s) residing within the QTL interact(s) with abdominal obesity to contribute to phenotypic variation of LVM. Suggestive evidence for linkage (LOD = 1.99) has been reported at the same peak marker for left ventricular geometry in a White population from the HyperGEN study, underscoring the importance of this QTL for left ventricular phenotype. Further fine mapping and validation studies are warranted to identify the underpinning genes.

Background

Stroke and cardiovascular diseases are of major public health concern, particularly among the rapidly growing Hispanic population [1]. Studies have shown that a positive family history is a strong predictor of stroke, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors, suggesting the existence of a substantial genetic component [2]. However, the genetic architecture of this common complex disease remains elusive. Given the extreme complexity of genetic and environmental contributions to stroke, evaluation of the precursor (risk) phenotypes, especially the quantitative ones, may reduce heterogeneity and increase statistical power for susceptibility gene discovery. Our Family Study of Stroke Risk and Carotid Atherosclerosis is uniquely designed to evaluate genetic contribution to cerebrovascular risk phenotypes, such as carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass (LVM).

LVM is an important risk factor for stroke. In the Framingham Heart Study, the highest quartile of LVM was associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk of stroke when compared to the lowest quartile of LVM, after adjusting for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, treatment of hypertension and other established stroke risk factors [3]. We have also demonstrated that LVM is significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke and combined vascular events in a multi-ethnic cohort comprised predominately of Hispanics [4]. The adjusted hazard ratio for the combined endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death was 1.34 per one standard deviation (SD) increase in LVM [95% CI 1.10 to 1.63].

As a quantitative trait, LVM is highly heritable. In the Framingham family study the heritability of LVM was estimated to be 0.24–0.32. [5] In the HyperGEN offspring study, the estimates of LVM heritability were 0.46 in African-Americans and 0.47 in Caucasians [6]. Heritability of LVM among Japanese subjects living in Hawaii was estimated to be 0.6 [7], similar to what we have seen in our sample of Caribbean Hispanics [8]. Consistent with a strong genetic influence, heritability estimates for LVM are often higher in twin studies than in sibling or family cohorts; the estimate is as high as 70% for monozygotic twins [9, 10]. These studies suggested a substantial genetic contribution to LVM variations and encouraged an effort to map the quantitative trait loci (QTL) for this trait.

Previously, we have published a comprehensive heritability analysis on LVM as well as adjusted LVM measurements: LVM divided by body surface area or height; relative wall thickness; LV end-diastolic diameter; LV end-systolic diameter; interventricular septum thickness; and posterior wall thickness. The estimates of heritability for these LV measurments ranged from 0.23 to 0.65 after different adjustment for covariates, with LVM demonstrating the highest heritability (0.47 to 0.65 in different models) [8]. Therefore, we focused our QTL mapping effort on LVM in this study. In addition, we implemented the Ordered-subset Analysis (OSA) based on LVM-related covariates to strengthen linkage, narrow the critical linkage region and identify a more etiologically homogeneous sample that can be used to guide further fine mapping studies.

Methods

Subjects

The details of the family study design have been described elsewhere. [11] In brief, probands for the family study were selected from the population-based North Manhattan Study (NOMAS). In order to maximize the genetic component in the families for stroke risk phenotypes and thereby enhance our chance to map susceptibility genes, we assembled a high-risk Caribbean Hispanic family dataset using the following criteria to define a qualifying proband: (1) reporting a sibling with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke; or (2) having 2 of 3 quantitative risk phenotypes (maximal carotid plaque thickness, left ventricular mass, or homocysteine level above the 75th percentile in the NOMAS cohort). The majority of the probands (80%) were recruited based on the first criteria. Families of the eligible probands were considered for enrollment if the proband was able to provide a family history, obtain the family member's permission for the research staff to contact them, and had at least two additional first-degree relatives able to participate. After the proband was contacted, the study coordinator followed up with the relatives to explain the study and solicit participation. Although the proband was identified in Northern Manhattan, we enrolled family members in New York at Columbia University and in the Dominican Republic at the Clinicas Corazones Unidos in Santo Domingo. All subjects provided informed consent to participate in the study and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Columbia University, University of Miami, and the National Bioethics Committee and the Independent Ethics Committee of Instituto Oncologico Regional del Cibao in the Dominican Republic (DR).

Demographic, socioeconomic and risk factor data were collected through direct interview of each family member based on instruments developed in NOMAS [12]. Extensive questionnaires regarding hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity were completed using systematic instruments. Measurements of anthropometrical indices including height, weight, hip and waist measures and skin-fold thickness were obtained, as were serial blood pressures. Fasting blood was collected and processed for lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, triglyceride, HDL), glucose, electrolytes, and creatinine. Storage of buffy coats and extraction of DNA was done by the Columbia University Genome Center.

Phenotyping

Baseline transthoracic echocardiography was done on 1360 Dominican family members and probands in the Family Study of Stroke Risk and Carotid Atherosclerosis. Standard two-dimensional echocardiography, including color-Doppler flow study was performed according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography [13]. Special attention was paid to obtaining high quality parasternal long axis views of the left ventricle, from which left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVSD), interventricular septum (IVS), and posterior wall thickness (PWT) were derived [14]. Sonographer performance was monitored quarterly after review of a random sample for technical adequacy of the images. Readers were blinded to familial relationships and vascular risk factors. Inter-observer variability for the variables of interest ranged between 8% and 10%. LVM was calculated according to the modified American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) formula: LVM = 0.8 [1.04 (LVDD + IVS+PWT)3 - (LVDD)3] +0.6. [15].

Genotyping and Quality Control

DNA was sent to the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) for genotyping. A set of 405 microsatellite markers were genotyped at an average interval of 10 centimorgan (cM) across the genome. Autosomal microsatellite genotypes were used to verify and adjust family structure using the program PREST. [16] In order to do so, the Maximized Log-Likelihood Ratio (MLLR) test statistics were computed to compare the putative relationship between pairs of individuals to those constructed based on the autosomal genotypes. Relationships with a p-value for the MLLR test of < 0.000001 in a consistent manner across the family were considered in error. Estimated kinship coefficients and identity by descent (IBD) estimates were used to rearrange family structure as needed. Finally, family structure was confirmed by running PREST again. Mendelian error checking was performed on the final family structure using Pedcheck [17].

Statistics

Heritability was evaluated using a pedigree-based maximum-likelihood method implemented in SOLAR. [18] Variance components methodology as implemented in SOLAR has emerged as a powerful method to detect linkage of quantitative traits and was used to calculate two-point and multipoint LOD scores [19, 20]. Ascertainment correction was automatically incorporated in the linkage analysis. First, marker-specific IBD were computed using the David and Weeks Monte Carlo algorithm for each marker. After marker-specific IBDs were merged together into one single file, multipoint IBDs were calculated using a 1 cM grid. Empirical p-values for LOD scores were calculated based on 10,000 replicates in which a fully-informative marker, unlinked to LVM, was simulated and used to compute possible LOD scores. Since SOLAR requires that quantitative traits be normally distributed and properly scaled, LVM measurements were natural-log transformed and multiplied by 10. To ensure normality, two outliers, whose LVM measurements were beyond three standard deviations from the mean, were dropped from further analysis.

To decide the covariates that should be included in estimating heritability and calculating LOD scores, a polygenic covariate screening implemented in SOLAR was run to screen age, sex, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and body mass index (BMI). Interaction between age and sex was automatically included in SOLAR. A permissive threshold of p < 0.1 was used for this evaluation to allow for inclusion of any potentially significant covariates. Hypertension was defined as reported history of high blood pressure, systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Smoking was defined as never versus ever. Dyslipidemia was defined as a history of hyperlididemia or total cholesterol greater than 240 mg/dL.

For the OSA, trait-related quantitative covariates were used to rank families for a more homogeneous subset [21]. LOD scores calculated in the overall linkage analysis for each family were used as input. Families were sequentially introduced into linkage analysis by the order of increasing or decreasing covariate values until the maximum evidence for linkage was achieved. A permutation procedure was implemented to generate an empirical p-value for the significance of the increase in the LOD score from the overall dataset to OSA identified subset. Specifically, 10,000 random family orderings were permuted and the maximum LOD scores from each of the random orderings were compared with the OSA results to derive the empirical p-value. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS v9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) unless specified otherwise.

Results

Overall, 110 families with high vascular disease burden (Dominican Republic 100, Puerto Rico 4, Cuba 2, Ecuador 2, Nicaragua 1, and Colombia 1) were enrolled in our family study. Seventy percent of the subjects were enrolled in Northern Manhattan and 30% in the Dominican Republic. In order to reduce population stratification, we restricted our QTL mapping to the 100 Dominican families, which was composed of 2182 individuals. The mean family size was 22 ± 11 with median of 20, and range of 4–87. LVM measurements and DNA samples were available for 1360 subjects from the 100 Dominican families. Among the 1360 individuals, there were 1207 sib pairs, 362 half-sib pairs, and 1713 avuncular pairs. With our dataset, we had over 80% power to detect QTLs for traits with heritability estimates greater than 0.18 at a LOD score threshold of 2.0. The mean age of the study cohort was 46 years. The mean LVM was 174.85 ± 56.14 (Table 1). Men had significantly greater mean LVM than women (201.42 vs 158.15, p < 0.0001).
Table 1

Sociodemographic, vascular risk factors, and left ventricular mass measurements

 

Males

Females

Total

 

(N = 525)

(N = 835)

(N = 1360)

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

Hypertension

200

38.10

340

40.72

540

39.71

Diabetes

77

14.67

109

13.05

186

13.68

Coronary artery disease*

80

15.24

164

19.64

244

17.94

Ever smoking

217

41.33

256

30.66

473

34.78

≥ High School Education

266

50.67

399

47.78

665

48.9

Enrolled in the DR

164

31.24

262

31.38

426

31.32

 

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Age

44.59 ± 17.21

47.10 ± 17.24

46.13 ± 17.26

Body mass index (kg/m2)

28.44 ± 5.34

28.98 ± 6.06

28.77 ± 5.80

Waist circumference (inch)

37.99 ± 5.18

35.57 ± 5.60

36.50 ± 5.57

Triceps skinfold thickness (mm)

21.12 ± 10.89

30.68 ± 10.62

27.00 ± 11.69

Fast glucose (mg/dl)

94.92 ± 44.12

89.38 ± 31.62

91.52 ± 37.04

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

183.31 ± 44.25

186.97 ± 40.58

185.56 ± 42.05

LDL (mg/dl)

110.76 ± 35.64

110.52 ± 34.96

110.61 ± 35.21

HDL (mg/dl)

44.80 ± 11.77

53.34 ± 13.55

50.05 ± 13.55

Triglyceride (mg/dl)

141.95 ± 116.77

115.46 ± 67.09

125.66 ± 90.43

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

124.18 ± 18.05

120.35 ± 20.69

121.82 ± 19.80

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

79.05 ± 10.84

75.78 ± 10.38

77.04 ± 10.68

Left ventricular mass

201.42 ± 60.88

158.15 ± 45.65

174.85 ± 56.14

*Coronary artery disease was defined as having a history of bypass surgery, angioplasty, or myocardial infarction.

The polygenic covariate screening identified age-sex interaction, sex, ever smoking, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and BMI as significant covariates. Heritability and LOD scores were calculated adjusting for these covariates. The significant covariates together explained 0.33 of the total LVM variance. The heritability estimate of LVM is 0.58 (p < 0.0001) for the remaining variance of LVM after adjusting for the significant covariates.

To localize the genetic loci affecting LVM variations, we completed a QTL mapping on LVM. This analysis revealed a significant region on chromosome 12p11 with peak marker at D12S1042 (MLOD = 3.11, empirical p value = 0.0003) (Figure 1). The one-LOD unit down critical interval extends from approximately 25 Megabase (Mb) to 51 Mb on chromosome 12, encompassing 181 annotated genes. No evidence for linkage (LOD > 1.5) was found in any other region through the genome (data not shown). Estimation of the locus specific heritability is 0.25 at D12S1042 and this locus accounted for 43% of the total heritability of LVM in our dataset.
Figure 1

Multipoint linkage plots for left ventricular mass on chromosome 12 in overall families and subset families defined by ordered-subset analysis on waist circumference. Maximum multipoint LOD scores were plotted along the chromosomal position in centimorgans (cM) on chromosome 12. Horizontal lines indicate the one-LOD unit down supporting intervals. All 100 families were used in the overall analysis and the LOD score is depicted by solid line. In the ordered-subset analysis, the families were ranked by mean waist circumference from high to low and sequentially introduced to linkage analysis until the maximum LOD score was achieved. 54 families with the highest waist circumference were used in the final analysis and the LOD score is depicted by the dashed line.

To better characterize the prominent linkage region on 12p11, we performed OSA to further reduce phenotypic heterogeneity. In this analysis, trait-related quantitative covariates were used to rank families for a more homogeneous subset. We chose SBP, BMI, and waist circumference (WC) as the covariates to order families because high blood pressure and obesity, especially elevated waist circumference (WC), are major risk factors that lead to an increase of LVM in general population [2224]. We ordered families by family average SBP, BMI, and WC. OSA results based on high to low (H-L) or low to high (L-H) ranking of the three covariates are listed in Table 2. The OSA maximum LOD score was increased in all H-L rankings (LOD = 3.81 to 4.45) but was not changed in the L-H rankings (LOD = 3.14 to 3.40), when compared to the overall analysis. Permutation tests were performed to evaluate the significance of increases in LOD scores. Among all the OSA ranking strategies that led to a higher LOD score, ordering families by decreasing average WC significantly increased the evidence for linkage (LOD = 4.45) (p = 0.0045 for increase in LOD score). In addition to significantly strengthening the linkage, this ranking strategy also greatly reduces the one-LOD unit down supporting interval size from 26 Mb to 14 Mb (Figure 1). The narrowed critical linkage region extends from 25 Mb to 39 Mb on chromosome 12 harboring 55 annotated genes. The OSA defined subset included 54 families with high WC. The average WC was 38.4 inches for the OSA subset families and 34.4 inches for the rest of the families (Table 2).
Table 2

Ordered-Subset analysis results on chromosome 12 p11.

Covariate

Position (cM)

Maximum OSA Lod

Empircal P value*

Number of Subset Families

Mean Covariate Value (SD) in subset

Mean Covariate Value (SD) in other families

WC (H to L)†

49

4.45

0.0045

54

38.4 (1.5)

34.4 (1.5)

WC (L to H)†

49

3.14

1

100

36.5 (2.5)

NA

SBP (H to L)

49

3.81

0.1075

84

124.2 (6.9)

112.6 (3.0)

SBP (L to H)

49

3.40

0.4228

94

121.1 (6.1)

141.5 (4.5)

BMI (H to L)

49

3.89

0.0759

78

30.0 (2.2)

25.3 (1.2)

BMI (L to H)

49

3.16

0.7716

98

28.8 (2.7)

35.5 (1.2)

† H to L: high to low; L to H: low to high; * p value is based on 10,000 permutations.

Discussion

Using well-characterized, extended Dominican Republic families, we mapped a novel QTL for LVM on chromosome 12p11. This QTL influences LVM independent of other risk factors such as gender, age, hypertension, BMI, and smoking. By implementing OSA to reduce phenotype heterogeneity, we have greatly strengthened the evidence for linkage, narrowed the linkage region and identified a sub-phenotype that has concentrated genetic effects from chromosome 12p11. Our findings provide a well-defined chromosome region and phenotype for future validation and fine mapping studies to localize genes controlling LVM.

The majority of genetic studies on LVM phenotype to date have focused on candidate genes derived from biological pathways that have impact on the LVM phenotype, such as genes implicated in myocardial cell growth/remodeling, calcium homeostasis, extracellular matrix, hemodynamic load, and blood pressure regulation. Polymorphisms in several genes have been associated with LVM, such as the 825C/T polymorphism in the G protein beta subunit (GNB3) gene, [2527] polymorphism in the beta-1 adrenergic receptor (beta-1 AR) gene, [28], the -344C/T polymorphism and a gene conversion in intron 2 in the aldosterone synthase gene, [29, 30] and the polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) gene. [31] However, the association results have been conflicting [10, 32]. Recently, a meta-analysis of 485 reports concluded that the -344C/T polymorphism in the aldosterone synthase gene is not significantly associated with LVM [33].

Other approaches to identify the underpinning genes for a disease-associated trait are unbiased genomic approaches, such as genome-wide linkage and association studies. These studies do not require a priori knowledge on the molecular basis of phenotypic variations and have advantages in identifying unknown/unexpected genes and pathways for complex traits. Previously, two genome-wide studies of LVM as a quantitative trait have been reported. Both of them were conducted in Caucasian populations [34, 35]. One was completed in white British families with hypertension and another one was conducted in families from the Framingham Heart Study. In the British study, suggestive evidence for linkage was found on chromosome 5p (MLOD = 1.6) for echocardiography-derived LVM (echo-LVM), and on chromosome 7q (MLOD = 1.7) and 12q (MLOD = 2.2) for electrocardiography-derived LVM (ECG-LVM) [34]. In the Framingham Heart Study, 100,000 of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested for association with LVM. None met the genome-wide significance level. Three SNPs with a nominal p-value less than 10-5 were found on chromosomes 2, 6, and 11. One SNP is located within a heat shock protein gene HSPA8; the other two SNPs are not located in or near known genes. Linkage analysis revealed strong evidence for linkage on chromosome 5q (MLOD = 4.4) and suggestive evidence for linkage on chromosomes 1q and 8q (MLOD = 2.4).

There is no overlap among the QTLs delimited in the British, the Framingham Heart, and the current studies. One possible explanation is that the unique ethnic population in our study may have a different genetic basis for LVM than Caucasians analyzed in the other two studies. However, the lack of replication even between the British and Framingham studies as well as the conflicting candidate gene studies, underscore the challenges in genetic analysis of complex traits: the genetic basis is likely to be complex and heterogeneous, involving multiple genes each with moderate effect and interaction with environmental factors. Within a given dataset, only one or two loci with the strongest effect in that population can be detected. In our study, the 12p11 QTL only accounts for less half of the total heritability of LVM. Other loci that have smaller effect sizes are still at large due to the limited power of the current dataset. Future studies in a similar population, including meta analyses are needed to catalogue all the genetic causes for the inter-individual LVM variations.

To reduce heterogeneity, stratification analysis based on a trait-related variable has been proposed in genetic studies of complex traits. The OSA ranks families by a trait-related variable and sequentially introduces the families to the linkage analysis until the maximum evidence of linkage is observed [36]. The subset defined by OSA is likely to represent a more etiologically homogeneous sample and thus increases the statistical power. Furthermore, the more homogeneous phenotype defined in the OSA subset provides insight to guide further analysis to pinpoint the genetic variants contributing to the trait. For example, in the GENECARD family study of coronary artery disease (CAD), OSA has identified a subset of families with very early age-of-onset (mean age-of-onset = 37.8 years) with strong evidence for linkage on chromosome 7p (LOD = 4.2). This finding was used to guide further association studies in subjects with early onset CAD and led to the discovery of the Neuropeptide Y gene polymorphism as genetic risk factor for atherosclerosis [37].

Using OSA, we found that the linkage signal on chromosome 12p11 is mainly from families with high WC. To exclude the possibility that we mapped a locus for WC instead of LVM, we performed a linkage analysis on WC and found no evidence suggesting that the signal on 12p11 is driven by WC (LOD = 0 at D12S1042 for WC). Therefore, the 12p11 linkage is a bona fide QTL for LVM and genes under this QTL interact with visceral obesity to influence inter-individual LVM variations. Adipose tissue is an active organ that secretes a variety of bioactive peptides. Several proteins of the renin angiotensin system, an essential regulatory axis for blood pressure, are expressed in adipose tissue. [38] Among them, angiotensinogen (AGT), angiotensin receptors type I (AT1), and ACE have higher expression in visceral than subcutaneous adipose tissue. Indeed, plasma AGT and plasma ACE activity are higher in obese individuals. [38] One possible scenario is that the candidate gene(s) in 12p11 QTL interact(s) with the bioactive peptides produced in visceral adipose tissue, such as ACE, to affect LVM. This interaction could confound phenotype-genotype correlations and should be taken into account in future fine-mapping studies.

The OSA based on BMI did not significantly enhance the linkage evidence despite that BMI and WC are correlated measurements, suggesting that WC provided additional information to BMI in the analysis of LVM. Consistently, recent reports from Rodrigues et al. [39] and Tsioufis CP et al. [40] showed that WC is an important predicator of LV hypertrophy and LV diastolic dysfunction. Furthermore, the impact of WC on LV structure and function seemed to be especially strong in women in those two studies. This gender specific effect should be considered in future studies in population-based cohort. The OSA based on SBP did not identify any subset that was significantly different from the randomly ordered families. However, our study is limited by the single clinic measurement of blood pressure and antihypertensive treatment. Blood pressure variation throughout the day is better predictor of left ventricular hypertrophy than a single clinic measurement, and antihypertensive treatment may reduce left ventricular hypertrophy depending on how long the patient has been treated. These could obscure the correlation between blood pressure and LVM.

It is worth noting that in the HyperGEN study suggestive evidence for linkage (LOD = 1.99) for LV geometry was found at the same peak marker (D12S1042) for LV mass in our study [41]. LV geometry is a combination of LV mass and relative wall thickness (RWT) of LV, with LV mass contributing to forming the different LV geometric patterns and RWT being an index of concentric geometry. Although the LV measurement is not exactly the same examined in our study, the encouraging LOD score at the same chromosomal location as found in the HyperGEN study corroborates our findings of chromosome 12p11 as a potential locus for LVM due to similarity between LV mass and LV geometry. Nonetheless, further validation studies on LVM are desired to confirm the QTL.

Our success in mapping a strong QTL relies on the strength of our study design. We focused on one ethnic group and used a family study design to minimize the effects of population substructure. All the families have high vascular disease burden and detailed systematic measurements of the quantitative phenotype. The extended family structure (average family size of 20) in our dataset provides unprecedented information content and statistical power. The QTL mapping approach also offers additional statistical advantages over discrete traits. A major limitation of our study is that we did not pinpoint the causal genetic variations that lead to increased LVM. This study is only the first stage to elucidate the genetic basis for LVM. Looking through all the genes under the 12p11 linkage peak did not find any gene that would have an obvious effect on LVM based on the current knowledge. However, the molecular basis of increased LVM is not clear and many genes' functions are not fully understood. We plan to perform fine mapping study across the linkage peak to narrow the critical region and identify the candidate gene in future studies.

Most genetic studies of cardiovascular disease have focused on non-Hispanic populations [4246] with a few exceptions such as the San Antonio Family Heart Study and the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [47, 48]. Our family study provides essential data to fill the gaps in our knowledge of the genetics of cerebrovascular risk phenotypes in minority populations.

Conclusion

With the unbiased genome-wide approach, we mapped a novel QTL for LVM, a significant risk phenotype for stroke and vascular events. The strong evidence for linkage on chromosome 12p11 warrants further validation and fine mapping efforts. In addition, our family study provides unique data on the genetics of cerebrovascular risk phenotypes in an understudied minority population.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the families and research staff who participated in the study in particular Dr. David Della Morte, Edison Sabala, and Mark McClendon. We thank Drs. Katihurca Almonte and Carlos Garcia Ligthgow for their support in the Dominican Republic. We also thank Dr. Luis Cuello Mainardi, Director of the Clinicas Corazones Unidos, where subjects were enrolled in the DR.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R01 NS NS40807 and RO1 NS047655.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Human Genetics, Miami Institute for Human Genomics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami
(2)
Department of Medicine, Columbia University
(3)
Department of Neurology and Epidemiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami

References

  1. White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Wright CB, Sacco RL: Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation. 2005, 111 (10): 1327-1331. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157736.19739.D0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jousilahti P, Rastenyte D, Tuomilehto J, Sarti C, Vartiainen E: Parental history of cardiovascular disease and risk of stroke. A prospective follow-up of 14371 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Stroke. 1997, 28 (7): 1361-1366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bikkina M, Levy D, Evans JC, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, Castelli WP: Left ventricular mass and risk of stroke in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994, 272 (1): 33-36. 10.1001/jama.272.1.33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rodriguez CJ, Lin F, Sacco RL, Jin Z, Boden-Albala B, Homma S, Di Tullio MR: Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass among Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Hypertension. 2006, 48 (1): 87-92. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000223330.03088.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Post WS, Larson MG, Myers RH, Galderisi M, Levy D: Heritability of left ventricular mass: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 1997, 30 (5): 1025-1028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Simone G, Tang W, Devereux RB, Hunt SC, Kitzman DW, Rao DC, Arnett DK: Assessment of the interaction of heritability of volume load and left ventricular mass: the HyperGEN offspring study. J Hypertens. 2007, 25 (7): 1397-1402. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328126851e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Assimes TL, Narasimhan B, Seto TB, Yoon S, Curb JD, Olshen RA, Quertermous T: Heritability of left ventricular mass in Japanese families living in Hawaii: the SAPPHIRe Study. J Hypertens. 2007, 25 (5): 985-992. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32809bd740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Juo SH, Di Tullio MR, Lin HF, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Homma S, Sacco RL: Heritability of left ventricular mass and other morphologic variables in Caribbean Hispanic subjects: the Northern Manhattan Family Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 46 (4): 735-737. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.025.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharma P, Middelberg RP, Andrew T, Johnson MR, Christley H, Brown MJ: Heritability of left ventricular mass in a large cohort of twins. J Hypertens. 2006, 24 (2): 321-324. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000202815.18083.03.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Swan L, Birnie DH, Padmanabhan S, Inglis G, Connell JM, Hillis WS: The genetic determination of left ventricular mass in healthy adults. Eur Heart J. 2003, 24 (6): 577-582. 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00524-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sacco RL, Sabala EA, Rundek T, Juo SH, Huang JS, DiTullio M, Homma S, Almonte K, Lithgow CG, Boden-Albala B: Design of a family study among high-risk Caribbean Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Family Study. Ethn Dis. 2007, 17 (2): 351-357.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkind MS, Sciacca R, Boden-Albala B, Rundek T, Paik MC, Sacco RL: Moderate alcohol consumption reduces risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006, 37 (1): 13-19. 10.1161/01.STR.0000195048.86810.5b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A: Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978, 58 (6): 1072-1083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Tullio MR, Zwas DR, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR, Homma S: Left ventricular mass and geometry and the risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003, 34 (10): 2380-2384. 10.1161/01.STR.0000089680.77236.60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986, 57 (6): 450-458. 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90771-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sun L, Wilder K, McPeek MS: Enhanced pedigree error detection. Hum Hered. 2002, 54 (2): 99-110. 10.1159/000067666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. O'Connell JR, Weeks DE: PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 259-266. 10.1086/301904.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Almasy L, Blangero J: Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 1198-1211. 10.1086/301844.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Amos CI, Krushkal J, Thiel TJ, Young A, Zhu DK, Boerwinkle E, de Andrade M: Comparison of model-free linkage mapping strategies for the study of a complex trait. Genet Epidemiol. 1997, 14 (6): 743-748. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<743::AID-GEPI30>3.0.CO;2-O.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schork NJ: Extended pedigree patterned covariance matrix mixed models for quantitative phenotype analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 1992, 9 (2): 73-86. 10.1002/gepi.1370090202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser ER, Watanabe RM, Duren WL, Bass MP, Langefeld CD, Boehnke M: Ordered subset analysis in genetic linkage mapping of complex traits. Genet Epidemiol. 2004, 27: 53-63. 10.1002/gepi.20000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shin J, Lee JU, Kim KS, Kim SG, Kim JH, Lim HK, Lee BH: Influence of abdominal circumference on the inappropriateness of left ventricular mass and diastolic function in non-obese patients. J Cardiol. 2007, 49 (6): 323-329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE: Left ventricular hypertrophy and clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2008, 21 (5): 500-508. 10.1038/ajh.2008.16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gosse P, Dallocchio M: Left ventricular hypertrophy: epidemiological prognosis and associated critical factors. Eur Heart J. 1993, 14 (Suppl D): 16-21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Siffert W, Rosskopf D, Siffert G, Busch S, Moritz A, Erbel R, Sharma AM, Ritz E, Wichmann HE, Jakobs KH, Horsthemke B: Association of a human G-protein beta3 subunit variant with hypertension. Nat Genet. 1998, 18 (1): 45-48. 10.1038/ng0198-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobi J, Hilgers KF, Schlaich MP, Siffert W, Schmieder RE: 825T allele of the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3) is associated with impaired left ventricular diastolic filling in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999, 17 (10): 1457-1462. 10.1097/00004872-199917100-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Poch E, Gonzalez D, Gomez-Angelats E, Enjuto M, Pare JC, Rivera F, de La Sierra A: G-Protein beta(3) subunit gene variant and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2000, 35 (1 Pt 2): 214-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mason DA, Moore JD, Green SA, Liggett SB: A gain-of-function polymorphism in a G-protein coupling domain of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (18): 12670-12674. 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kupari M, Hautanen A, Lankinen L, Koskinen P, Virolainen J, Nikkila H, White PC: Associations between human aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) gene polymorphisms and left ventricular size, mass, and function. Circulation. 1998, 97 (6): 569-575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schunkert H, Hengstenberg C, Holmer SR, Broeckel U, Luchner A, Muscholl MW, Kurzinger S, Doring A, Hense HW, Riegger GA: Lack of association between a polymorphism of the aldosterone synthase gene and left ventricular structure. Circulation. 1999, 99 (17): 2255-2260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schunkert H, Hense HW, Holmer SR, Stender M, Perz S, Keil U, Lorell BH, Riegger GA: Association between a deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene and left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330 (23): 1634-1638. 10.1056/NEJM199406093302302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindpaintner K, Lee M, Larson MG, Rao VS, Pfeffer MA, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ, Wilson AF, Wilson PW, Vasan RS, Myers RH, Levy D: Absence of association or genetic linkage between the angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene and left ventricular mass. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334 (16): 1023-1028. 10.1056/NEJM199604183341604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sookoian S, Gianotti TF, Pirola CJ: Role of the C-344T aldosterone synthase gene variant in left ventricular mass and left ventricular structure-related phenotypes. Heart. 2008, 94 (7): 903-910. 10.1136/hrt.2007.119545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayosi BM, Avery PJ, Farrall M, Keavney B, Watkins H: Genome-wide linkage analysis of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in families with hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2008, 29 (4): 525-530. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Aragam J, Wang TJ, Mitchell GF, Kathiresan S, Newton-Cheh C, Vita JA, Keyes MJ, O'Donnell CJ, Levy D, Benjamin EJ: Genome-wide association of echocardiographic dimensions, brachial artery endothelial function and treadmill exercise responses in the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2007, 8 (Suppl 1): S2-10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hauser ER, Watanabe RM, Duren WL, Bass MP, Langefeld CD, Boehnke M: Ordered subset analysis in genetic linkage mapping of complex traits. Genet Epidemiol. 2004, 27: 53-63. 10.1002/gepi.20000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shah SH, Freedman NJ, Zhang L, Crosslin DR, Stone DH, Haynes C, Johnson J, Nelson S, Wang L, Connelly JJ, Muehlbauer M, Ginsburg GS, Crossman DC, Jones CJH, Vance J, Sketch MHJ, Granger CB, Newgard CB, Gregory SG, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Kraus WE, Hauser ER: Neuropeptide Y Gene Polymorphisms Confer Risk of Early-onset Atherosclerosis. PLoS Genetics. 2009, 5 (1): e1000318-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000318.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kershaw EE, Flier JS: Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89 (6): 2548-2556. 10.1210/jc.2004-0395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues SL, Angelo LC, Pereira AC, Krieger JE, Mill JG: Determinants of left ventricular mass and presence of metabolic risk factors in normotensive individuals. Int J Cardiol. 2009, 135 (3): 323-30. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsioufis CP, Tsiachris DL, Selima MN, Dimitriadis KS, Thomopoulos CG, Tsiliggiris DC, Gennadi AS, Syrseloudis DC, Stefanadi ES, Toutouzas KP, Kallikazaros IE, Stefanadis CI: Impact of waist circumference on cardiac phenotype in hypertensives according to gender. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009, 17 (1): 177-182. 10.1038/oby.2008.462.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kraja AT, Huang P, Tang W, Hunt SC, North KE, Lewis CE, Devereux RB, de Simone G, Arnett DK, Rice T, Rao DC: QTLs of factors of the metabolic syndrome and echocardiographic phenotypes: the hypertension genetic epidemiology network study. BMC Med Genet. 2008, 9: 103-10.1186/1471-2350-9-103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams RR, Rao DC, Ellison RC, Arnett DK, Heiss G, Oberman A, Eckfeldt JH, Leppert MF, Province MA, Mockrin SC, Hunt SC: NHLBI family blood pressure program: methodology and recruitment in the HyperGEN network. Hypertension genetic epidemiology network. Ann Epidemiol. 2000, 10: 389-400. 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00063-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt SC, Hasstedt SJ, Kuida H, Stults BM, Hopkins PN, Williams RR: Genetic heritability and common environmental components of resting and stressed blood pressures, lipids, and body mass index in Utah pedigrees and twins. Am J Epidemiol. 1989, 129 (3): 625-638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Watanabe RM, Valle T, Hauser ER, Ghosh S, Eriksson J, Kohtamaki K, Ehnholm C, Tuomilehto J, Collins FS, Bergman RN, Boehnke M: Familiality of quantitative metabolic traits in Finnish families with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Finland-United States Investigation of NIDDM Genetics (FUSION) Study investigators. Hum Hered. 1999, 49 (3): 159-168. 10.1159/000022865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Morton NE, Gulbrandsen CL, Rao DC, Rhoads GG, Kagan A: Determinants of blood pressure in Japanese-American Families. Hum Genet. 1980, 53 (2): 261-266. 10.1007/BF00273508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Moll PP, Harburg E, Burns TL, Schork MA, Ozgoren F: Heredity, stress and blood pressure, a family set approach: the Detroit Project revisited. J Chronic Dis. 1983, 36 (4): 317-328. 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90117-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mitchell BD, Kammerer CM, Blangero J, Mahaney MC, Rainwater DL, Dyke B, Hixson JE, Henkel RD, Sharp RM, Comuzzle AG, VandeBerg JL, Stern MP, MacCluer JW: Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans. The San Antonio Family Heart Study. 1996, 94: 2159-2170.Google Scholar
  48. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O'Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP: Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002, 156 (9): 871-881. 10.1093/aje/kwf113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/10/74/prepub

Copyright

© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement