Skip to main content

Table 2 Association analysis of urolithiasis risk and SPP1 genetic variants considering dominant, recessive and log-additive genetic models

From: Osteopontin promoter polymorphisms and risk of urolithiasis: a candidate gene association and meta-analysis study

SPP1 polymorphisms

Model

Genotypes

Patients n = 235, n (%)

Controls value 243, n (%)

OR (95% CI)

p-value (corrected)†

rs2853744:G > T

Dominant

T/T

07 (3.1%)

21 (9.1%)

1.00

0.006

G/T-G/G

217 (96.9%)

210 (90.9%)

3.14 (1.29–7.45)

Recessive

T/T-G/T

68 (30.4%)

83 (35.1%)

1.00

0.210

G/G

156 (69.4%)

148 (64.9%)

1.29 (0.87–1.90)

Log-additive

–

–

–

1.38 (1.01–1.89)S

0.040

rs11730582:T > C

Dominant

T/T

63 (28%)

69 (29.6%)

1.00

0.700

T/C-C/C

162 (72%)

164 (70.4%)

1.08 (0.72–1.62)

Recessive

T/T-T/C

150 (66.7%)

182 (78.1%)

1.00

0.006

C/C

75 (33.3%)

51 (21.9%)

1.78 (1.18–2.71)

Log-additive

–

–

–

1.26 (0.99–1.61)

0.062

rs11439060:delG > G

Dominant

G/G

19 (8.3%)

12 (5%)

1.00

0.150

dG/G-dG/dG

209 (91.7%)

226 (95%)

0.58 (0.28–1.23)

Recessive

G/G-dG/G

84 (36.8%)

115 (48.3%)

1.00

0.012

dG/dG

144 (63.2%)

123 (51.7%)

1.60 (1.11–2.60)

Log-additive

–

–

–

1.24 (0.92–1.67)

0.15

  1. †p-values are corrected for age and gender. p-value adjustment for multiple testing using Bonferroni method was also made (p-value threshold 0.016). Statistical significance is highlighted in bold
  2. OR Odds ratio; n (%), frequency and CI Confidence interval