Skip to main content

Table 4 Meta-analysis of studies reporting familial cases in different subgroups

From: Associations between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: systematic-review and meta-analysis of 55 case-control studies

Potential

 

Odd Ratio

(CI 95%)

No of Studies

Heterogeneity χ2

P value

I2

Interaction p value

A Homozygote model: MM vs. TT

 Ethnicity

Caucasian

1.204 (0.835–1.735)

5

2.56

0.634

0.0%

0.000

Mixed

0.451 (0.309–0.659)

3

1.8

0.406

0.0%

 Study-based

Hospital-based

1.184 (0.784–1.788)

4

1.52

0.677

0.0%

0.690

Population-based

0.581 (0.318–1.060)

4

8.24

0.041

63.6%

 Methodological quality

Good

1.080 (0.691–1.688)

3

0.67

0.716

0.0%

0.002

Fair

0.504 (0.304–0.834)

4

4.51

0.211

33.5%

Poor

1.449 (0.752–2.793)

1

0.00

.

.%

 Case enrollment strategies

Incident

1.000 (0.300–3.327)

2

1.64

0.201

38.9%

0.068

Prevalent

0.683 (0.412–1.134)

5

10.69

0.030

62.6%

Not mentioned

1.449 (0.752–2.793)

1

0

.

.%

 All studies

 

0.809 (0.521–1.258)

8

17.7

0.013

60.4%

–

B Dominant model: TM + MM vs. TT

 Ethnicity

Caucasian

1.012 (0.800–1.280)

5

0.82

0.936

0.0%

0.576

Mixed

1.104 (0.909–1.341)

3

0.39

0.824

0.0%

 Study-based

Hospital-based

1.016 (0.770–1.341)

4

1.11

0.775

0.0%

0.690

Population-based

1.087 (0.910–1.299)

4

0.25

0.969

0.0%

 Methodological quality

Good

1.132 (0.855–1.499)

3

0.13

0.937

0.0%

0.614

Fair

1.075 (0.887–1.304)

4

0.41

. 0.937

0.0%

Poor

0.868 (0.553–1.364)

1

0.00

.

.%

 Case enrollment strategies

Incident

0.958 (0.530–1.733)

2

0.39

0.201

38.9%

0.579

Prevalent

1.104 (0.936–1.302)

5

0.03

0.856

0.0%

Not mentioned

0.868 (0.553–1.364)

1

0

.

.%

 All studies

 

1.066 (0.917–1.238)

8

1.52

0.982

0.0%

–

C Recessive model: MM vs. TM + TT

 Ethnicity

Caucasian

1.233 (0.877–1.732)

5

3.41

0.491

0.0%

0.576

Mixed

0.462 (0.298–0.716)

3

2.65

0.266

24.5%

 Study-based

Hospital-based

1.224 (0.834–1.796)

4

1.25

0.742

0.0%

0.690

Population-based

0.409 (0.228–0.734)

4

10.89

0.012

72.4%

 Methodological quality

Good

1.172 (0.765–1.793)

3

0.79

0.675

0.0%

0.614

Fair

0.515 (0.297–0.894)

4

5.63

0.131

46.7%

Poor

1.389 (0.770–2.508)

1

0.00

. 2.508

–

 Case enrollment strategies

Incident

0.977 (0.258–3.707)

5

14.05

0.007

71.5%

0.579

Prevalent

0.718 (0.410–1.257)

2

2.36

0.124

57.7%

Not mentioned

1.389 (0.770–2.508)

1

0.00

–

–

 All studies

 

0.831 (0.524–1.319)

8

21.53

0.003

67.5%

–

  1. Bold entry is significant