Skip to main content

Table 3 Meta-analysis of the association between rs2195239 and rs2162679 polymorphisms and cancer risk

From: Association between the insulin-like growth factor 1 gene rs2195239 and rs2162679 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Subgroup

No.

Allele model

Homozygote model

Heterozygote model

Dominant model

Recessive model

  

OR(95% Cl)

P OR

P h

OR(95% Cl)

P OR

P h

OR(95% Cl)

P OR

P h

OR(95% Cl)

P OR

P h

OR(95% Cl)

P OR

P h

rs2195239

 

C vs. G

CC vs. GG

GC vs. GG

CC + GC vs. GG

CC vs. GC + GG

 Overall

8

0.97(0.93–1.01)

0.103

0.722

0.88(0.80–0.98)

0.018

0.454

1.00 (0.93–1.10)

0.972

0.526

0.97(0.90–1.05)

0.466

0.659

0.95 (0.90–1.01)

0.083

0.162

 Asian

3

0.91 (0.82–1.00)

0.044

0.906

0.81 (0.66–0.99)

0.035

0.731

0.96 (0.83–1.12)

0.616

0.534

0.92 (0.79–1.06)

0.232

0.831

0.83 (0.69–0.98)

0.031

0.362

 Breast cancer

3

0.97(0.93–1.02)

0.282

0.939

0.91 (0.81–1.03)

0.152

0.294

0.99 (0.89–1.10)

0.866

0.238

0.97(0.87–1.07)

0.536

0.474

0.97(0.91–1.03)

0.308

0.131

 Pancreatic cancer

2

1.02 (0.89–1.16)

0.833

0.139

0.94 (0.67–1.31)

0.710

0.134

1.11 (0.92–1.34)

0.275

0.921

1.08 (0.91–1.30)

0.466

0.600

0.88(0.51–1.51)*

0.640

0.087

rs2162679

 

G vs. A

GG vs. AA

AG vs. AA

GG + AG vs. AA

GG vs. AG + AA

 Overall

5

0.87 (0.80–0.94)

0.001

0.693

0.70 (0.57–0.87)

0.001

0.787

0.91 (0.82–1.02)

0.209

0.556

0.88(0.79–0.97)

0.011

0.578

0.73 (0.60–0.89)

0.002

0.817

 Asian

2

0.85 (0.76–0.96)

0.007

0.302

0.70 (0.54–0.90)

0.005

0.737

0.97(0.71–1.33)*

0.845

0.096

0.86 (0.74–1.01)

0.065

0.131

0.73 (0.57–0.92)

0.009

0.824

 Quality score ≥ 12

2

0.87 (0.77–0.99)

0.037

0.389

0.67 (0.44–1.00)

0.049

0.385

0.91 (0.78–1.06)

0.225

0.629

0.88(0.76–1.02)

0.093

0.492

0.68 (0.46–1.02)

0.064

0.412

  1. Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, POR pool P value, Ph P value of heterogeneity test, *indicates that the OR, 95% Cl, and corresponding POR were calculated based on the random-effects model; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used. Bold values are statistically significant (POR < 0.05)