Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between CYP2C19 genotype and risk of ESCC

From: Independent and combined effects of environmental factors and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Fujian Province of China

Polymorphism. ID no

Genotypes

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI a )

P -value a,b

CYP2C19*2

      

rs4244285

GG

59 (20.70)

243 (42.63)

1.00 (Reference)

1.00 (Reference)

6.47 × 10-8

 

GA

174 (61.05)

272 (47.72)

2.64 (1.87 ~ 3.71)

2.91 (1.99 ~ 4.25)

4.46 × 10-7

 

AA

52 (18.25)

55 (9.65)

3.89 (2.42 ~ 6.26)

4.82 (2.84 ~ 8.17)

1.21 × 10-6

 

GA + AA

226 (79.30)

327 (57.37)

2.85 (2.04 ~ 3.96)

3.19 (2.21 ~ 4.61)

2.16 × 10-8

Test for trend

   

2.08 (1.66 ~ 2.61)

2.30 (1.79 ~ 2.97)

3.17 × 10-8

CYP2C19*3

      

rs4986893

GG

262 (91.93)

509 (89.30)

1.00 (Reference)

1.00 (Reference)

0.236

 

GA

23 (8.07)

61 (10.70)

0.73 (0.44 ~ 1.21)

0.72 (0.422 ~ 1.24)

 

EMs

*2/*2,*2/*3

226 (79.30)

491 (86.14)

1.00 (Reference)

1.00 (Reference)

0.009

PMs

*1/*1, *1/*2, *1/*3

59 (20.70)

79 (13.86)

1.62 (1.12 ~ 2.35)

1.71 (1.14 ~ 2.57)

 
  1. n: number of individuals; OR, odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
  2. aAdjusted for sex, age, education, income, smoking, tea drinking, body mass index and other variables.
  3. bP value based on the Wald test.