Peer Review reports
From: Duplication 9p and their implication to phenotype
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maria Isabel Melaragno |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maria Isabel Melaragno |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniela Concolino |
| 9 Oct 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gérard Tachdjian |
| 26 Nov 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maria Isabel Melaragno |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Nov 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Nov 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Maria Isabel Melaragno |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Nov 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Dec 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Dec 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12881-014-0142-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.