Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
18 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Eisenbarth |
29 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCarthy |
23 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCarthy |
8 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
24 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Debbie Smyth |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
24 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
6 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-7-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.