Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Efird |
16 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keri Monda |
24 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Audrey Choh |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
21 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Yan Ling |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Efird |
5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keri Monda |
5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Audrey Choh |
31 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Yan Ling |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Audrey Choh |
21 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keri Monda |
1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Yan Ling |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Yan Ling |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Yan Ling |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
13 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-12-66 |
You can find further information about peer review here.