Figure 2
![Figure 2](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-11-111/MediaObjects/12881_2009_Article_672_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
Haplotype comparison of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 allele frequency in RES, SOR and POP. * p < 0.05; FET. RES verses SOR; haplotype 4 (*1/*1/*3/*1) was significantly different POP = Random Ghanaian population, RES = responders, SOR = Suboptimal responders.