Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Janis Klovins |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giles Yeo |
9 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yvon Chagnon |
9 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Argyropoulos |
2 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inga Prokopenko |
12 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Janis Klovins |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Argyropoulos |
5 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giles Yeo |
5 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yvon Chagnon |
17 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inga Prokopenko |
5 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Janis Klovins |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Janis Klovins |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
10 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Janis Klovins |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-10-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.