Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism is not a strong risk factor for diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy in Type I diabetes: case-control study

BMC Medical Genetics20012:8

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-2-8

Received: 10 March 2001

Accepted: 24 July 2001

Published: 24 July 2001

Abstract

Background

The gene encoding apolipoprotein E (APOE) has been proposed as a candidate gene for vascular complications in Type I diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the influence of three-allelic variations in the APOE gene for the development of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy.

Results

Neither APOE alleles frequencies or APOE genotypes frequencies differed between Type I diabetic groups either with or without nephropathy. Similar results were found for patients with and without diabetic retinopathy.

Conclusions

APOE gene polymorphism does not determine genetic susceptibility for the development of diabetic retinopathy in Type I diabetes patients. Association between APOE gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy may be weak or moderate, but not strong.

Background

Familial and epidemiological studies have indicated that there is a strong genetic component in the aetiology of diabetic nephropathy in Type I diabetes patients [1,2]. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) was discovered as a plasma protein involved in the metabolism of lipoproteins. Recently, the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene has been suggested to be a risk factor for the development of micro- and macrovascular complications in diabetic patients.

The APOE gene is polymorphic. There are three common alleles, E2, E3, and E4, which code for three major isoforms, resulting in six common genotypes [3,4]. Individuals with apoE2 have higher triglyceride levels and are associated with lower cholesterol compared to individuals with apoE3. Individuals with apoE4 often have elevated plasma cholesterol levels. There is an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and particularly Alzheimer's disease [5,6,7].

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism may influence the metabolism of lipoproteins in diabetic patients. Several recent studies have suggested that this polymorphism may be associated with a genetic predisposition for diabetic nephropathy [8,9,10,11]. Thus, APOE is an important candidate gene for the development of microvascular complications in Type I diabetes patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of APOE gene polymorphism in the development of diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy in Type I diabetes patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients

In this study, all patients were Russians with unrelated Type I diabetes. All diabetic patients for the case-control study were recruited from St.Petersburg Diabetological Centres and had participated in the program "Diabetes mellitus" (which included monitoring of trends and examinations of the determinants of vascular complications in Type I diabetes) carried out in St. Petersburg, Russia since 1997.

The diabetic patients included in this study satisfied the World Health Organization criteria for diabetes mellitus [12]. Glycated haemoglobin (HbAlc) was measured by ion exchange chromatography [13]. At entry the patients had HbAlc levels of 5.7 to 16.8%.

The Type I diabetes groups consisted of 74 subjects with nephropathy and 92 subjects without. The study covered 76 Type I diabetes patients with diabetic retinopathy and 96 patients without. Some subjects had more than one type of diabetic complication, and consequently were analysed in more than one group.

For Type I diabetes patients, all the information was examined for evidence of nondiabetic renal disease. Then questionnaires, medical records, and measurements of albumin excretion were used to determine whether they had diabetic nephropathy. Those patients were considered to have diabetic nephropathy if they were receiving treatment for renal disease and either suffered from persisting proteinuria, or had persisting high albuminuria. Urinary albumin excretion was measured by nephelometry [14]. Nephropathy was defined as a persistent urinary albumin excretion of more than 20 μg/min, or 30 mg/24 h in two out of three consecutive urinalyses. Individuals with no history of nephropathy and no albumin excretion were considered free of nephropathy.

Fundus ophthalmoscopy and angiofluorography were used to diagnose retinopathy. The diabetic retinopathy group consisted of those showing retinal change, while Type I diabetes control group were those who showed no signs of retinopathy.

DNA genotyping

Blood was collected from each individual and stored in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes at -20°C. Genomic DNA was obtained from lysed white blood cells by phenol-chloroform extraction. The APOE gene polymorphism was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). APOE genotyping was performed by the method of Hixson and Vernier [15] using a modified version described by Skobeleva et al. [16].

The sequence of the sense oligonucleotide primer was 5'-AGATGCGGGCACGGCTGTTCAAGGA-3', and the antisense primer was 5'-CCCTCGCGAGCCCCGGCCTGGTACAC-3' [16]. Each amplification reaction contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM tris-HCl pH 8.4, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 μM of each primer, 200 μM dNTP, 10% DMSO, 0.1 μg DNA and 1 U Tag polymerase in a final volume of 20 μl. After denaturation step at 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 30 cycle of denaturation at 92°C (1 min), annealing at 64°C (1 min), extension at 72°C (1.5 min) and a final extension at 72°C (5 min) using a MiniCycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). Genotypes were determined by Hin61 (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) digestion of a 244-base pair PCR-amplified fragment spanning the two polymorphic sites. The digested DNA fragments were separated using migration on 12% polyacrylamide gels and visualized under UV illumination after ethidium bromide staining [16]. The codominant alleles E2, E3, and E4 determine the six APOE genotypes.

Statistical testing

All data are presented as means ± SD. Groups were compared using the Student's t test for comparison of two groups for quantitative variables. Allele frequency among control subjects and case subjects were compared using standard Χ2 tests. The difference in genotype frequencies between the groups was tested by Fisher's exact test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics by study group are shown in Table 1. No significant difference was seen between groups with vascular complications (nephropathy and retinopathy) and those without, no matter the age, diabetes duration, age at diabetes onset, and mean HbAlc.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics by study groups

 

Type I diabetes

Type I diabetes

Type I diabetes

Type I diabetes

 

subjects

subjects

subjects

subjects

 

with

without

with

without

 

nephropathy

nephropathy

retinopathy

retinopathy

 

(DN+)

(DN-)

(DR+)

(DR-)

Total subjects

74

92

76

96

Age (years)

25.1 ± 11.9

20.8 ± 8.7

29.8 ± 10.1

22.9 ± 9.1

Sex

    

(male/female)

40/34

40/52

34/42

50/46

Diabetes

    

duration

14.8 ± 8.8

10.9 ± 4.3

17.4 ± 8.6

11.2 ± 3.1

(years)

    

Diabetes onset

    

(years)

11.1 ± 6.2

10.3 ± 6.8

12.2 ± 8.1

11.5 ± 5.2

HbA1c(%)

10.5 ± 2.2

9.8 ± 1.9

10.6 ± 1.7

9.9 ± 1.7

Data are means ± SD

The frequency of each genotype in each group conformed to the Hardy -Weinberg equilibrium.

The distribution of the APOE genotypes is shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in APOE genotype and allele frequency between nephropathic and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients. In this study, no association was found between diabetic retinopathy and APOE polymorphisms. APOE allele frequencies for males and females were similar within groups and in different groups.
Table 2

Distributionof APOE genotypes and alleles in the case-control association study

 

Type I

Type I

P

Type I

Type I

P

 

diabetes

diabetes

value

diabetes

diabetes

Value

 

subjects

subjects

 

subjects

subjects

 
 

with

without

 

with

without

 
 

nephropathy

nephropathy

 

retinopathy

retinopathy

 
 

(DN+)

(DN-)

 

(DR+)

(DR-)

 
 

n (%)

n (%)

 

n (%)

n (%)

 
 

m/f (%/%)

m/f (%/%)

 

m/f (%/%)

m/f (%/%)

 
 

74 (100)

92(100)

 

76 (100)

96(100)

 

Total subjects

40/34

40/52

 

34/42

50/46

 
 

(54.0/46.0)

(43.5/56.5)

 

(44.7/55.3)

(52.1/47.9)

 
  

2(2.2)

  

1(1.0)

 

E2E2

0

0/2

NS

0

0/1

NS

  

(0/3.8)

  

(0/2.2)

 
 

48(64.9)

54(58.7)

 

45(59.2)

61(63.6)

 

E3E3

25/23

27/27

NS

21/24

33/28

NS

 

(62.5/67.6)

(67.5/51.9)

 

(61.8/57.1)

(66.9/60.9)

 
     

1(1.0)

 

E4E4

0

0

NS

0

0/1

NS

     

(0/2.2)

 
 

13(17.6)

20(21.7)

 

18(23.7)

16(16.7)

 

E2E3

8/5

5/15

NS

9/9

6/10

NS

 

(20.0/14.7)

(12.5/28.8)

 

(26.4/21.4)

(12.0/21.7)

 
 

3(4.0)

  

3(3.9)

1(1.0)

 

E2E4

0/3

0

NS

0/3

1/0

NS

 

(0/8.9)

  

(0/7.2)

(2.0/0)

 
 

10(13.5)

16(17.4)

 

10(13.2)

16(16.7)

 

E3E4

7/3

8/8

NS

4/6

10/6

NS

 

(17.5/8.8)

(20.0/15.5)

 

(11.8/14.3)

(20.0/13.0)

 
 

16(10.8)

24(13.0)

 

21(13.8)

19(9.9)

 

E2

8/8

5/19

NS

9/12

7/12

NS

 

(10.0/11.8)

(6.3/18.3)

 

(13.2/14/3)

(7.0/13.0)

 
 

119(80.4)

144(78.3)

 

118(77.6)

154(80.2)

 

E3

65/54

67/77

NS

55/63

82/72

NS

 

(81.3/79.4)

(83.7/74.0)

 

(80.9/75.0)

(82.0/78.3)

 
 

13(8.8)

16(8.7)

 

13(8.6)

19(9.9)

 

E4

7/6

8/8

NS

4/9

11/8

NS

 

(8.7/8.8)

(10.0/7.7)

 

(5.9/10.7)

(11.0/8.7)

 

Total

148 (100)

184(100)

 

152(100)

192(100)

 

chromosomes

80/68

40/104

 

68/84

100/92

 
 

(54.1/45.9)

(43.5/56.5)

 

(44.7/55.3)

(52.1/47.9)

 

NS, not significant (P value > 0.05)

Discussion

Diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy are the two most important microangiopathic complications in Type I diabetic patients. Many of the environmental factors that influence the risk of vascular disease are known, but genetic components of the risk for diabetic microangiopathy are poorly understood. Several candidate genes have been investigated to elucidate the genetic factors responsible for vascular complications. The most important of these are the aldose reductase gene (ALR2) [17], the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin I – converting enzyme (ACE) gene [18,19], C825T polymorphism of the gene encoding the beta-3 subunit of geterotrimeric G-proteins (GNB3) [20,21,22], and C677T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) [23].

The genetic polymorphism of apolipoprotein E is associated with lipid abnormalities. Eto et al. [9] suggested that lipid abnormalities may contribute to the development and progression of kidney disease, including diabetic nephropathy. The E2 allele frequency was significantly higher in Type II diabetes patients with nephropathy (7.2%) and with renal failure (9.7%) than in diabetic patients without nephropathy (2.6%) [9]. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism is associated with the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Presence of the apolipoprotein E4 allele is a protective factor, and other alleles entail risk factors [24].

The genes responsible for genetic predisposition to vascular complications are still unknown, and little is known about the molecular basis of these complications. The influence of the APOE gene polymorphism to the development of diabetic microangiopathy is uncertain. Chowdhury et al. [10] and Araki et al. [11] demonstrated an association between the presence of the APOE E2 allele and diabetic nephropathy in Caucasian patients with Type I diabetes, although some investigators do not support this association [25,26].

This study elucidated the role of APOE gene polymorphism in the predisposition to diabetic vascular complications. No association ofAPOE gene polymorphism with diabetic nephropathy was demonstrated. This result for diabetic nephropathy confirms the findings of Tarnow et al. [25] and Onuma et al. [26]. It should be mentioned that sample sizes in [10,11] were larger than in this study. With increased sample size comes the possibility to demonstrate an association. But the larger the necessary and sufficient minimal sample size, the weaker the association demonstrated.

We also analysed the association of the APOE gene polymorphism with diabetic retinopathy in the present study. No significant differences were found between groups with and without this vascular complication. A similar result has been shown by Tarnow et al. [25] for diabetic retinopathy.

Conclusions

The present study found no evidence for a role of the APOE gene polymorphism in genetic susceptibility for the development of diabetic retinopathy in Type I diabetes patients. Association between APOE gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy may be weak or moderate, but not strong.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant M00-2.6K-359 from Competitive Centre of Basic Science (St.Petersburg, Russia).

The author thanks Dr. A.S.Stroikova (St.Petersburg Diabetic Centre, St.Petersburg, Russia) for her valuable consultation and verification of patients' clinical information.

The author can not but mention agitated discussions with Prof. E.I.Schwartz (St.Petersburg Paediatric Medical Academy, St.Petersburg, Russia).

The author wishes to thank reviewers Dr. S.Bain and Dr. A.Demaine for careful reading and helpful comments on the manuscript.

Special thanks to J.Fletcher (Redraft.com, Maidenhead, UK) for redrafting in part and H.Kidd, Ph.D. (Bioscience Editors – GWE, Akarp, Sweden) for editing in part.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
St.Petersburg State Medical University, Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology

References

  1. Andersen AR, Christiansen JS, Andersen JK, Kreiner S, Deckert T: Diabetic nephropathy in Type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes: an epidemiological study. Diabetologia. 1983, 25: 496-501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Quinn M, Angelico MC, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Familial factors determine the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with IDDM. Diabetologia. 1996, 39: 940-945. 10.1007/s001250050535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Utermann G, Langenbeck U, Beisiegel U, Weber W: Genetics of the apolipoprotein E system in man. Am J Hum Genet. 1980, 32: 339-347.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Zannis VI, Breslow JL: Human very low density lipoprotein apolipoprotein E isoprotein polymorphism is explained by genetic variation and posttranslational modification. Biochemistry. 1981, 20: 1033-1041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reilly SL, Ferrell RE, Kottke BA, Kamboh MI, Sing CF: The gender-specific apolipoprotein E genotype influence on the distribution of lipids and apolipoproteins in the population of Rochester, MN. I. Pleiotropic effects on means and variances. Am J Hum Genet. 1991, 49: 1155-1166.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Xhignesse M, Lussier-Cacan S, Sing CF, Kessling AM, Davignon J: Influences of common variants of apolipoprotein E on measures of lipid metabolism in a sample selected for health. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991, 11: 1100-1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickeboller H, Campion D, Brice A, Amouyel P, Hannequin D, Didierjean 0, Penet C, Martin C, Perez-Tur J, Michon A, et al: Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: genotype-specific risks by age and sex. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60: 439-446.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ukkola 0, Kervinen K, Salmela PI, von DickhoffK, Laakso M, Kesaniemi YA: Apolipoprotein E phenotype is related to macro- and microangiopathy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis. 1993, 101: 9-15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eto M, Horita K, Morikawa A, Nakata H, Okada M, Saito M, Nomura M, Abiko A, Iwashima Y, Ikoda A, et al: Increased frequency of apolipoprotein epsilon 2 allele in non-insulin dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients with nephropathy. Clin Genet. 1995, 48: 288-292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chowdhury TA, Dyer PH, Kumar S, Gibson SP, Rowe BR, Davies SJ, Marshall SM, Morris PJ, Gill GV, Feeney S, et al: Association of apolipoprotein epsilon2 allele with diabetic nephropathy in Caucasian subjects with IDDM. Diabetes. 1998, 47: 278-280.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Araki S, Moczulski DK, Hanna L, Scott LJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: APOE polymorphisms and the development of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: results of case-control and family-based studies. Diabetes. 2000, 49: 2190-2195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diabetes Mellitus. WHO Technical Report Series. 1985, , 727. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  13. Jeppsson JO, Jerntorp P, Sundkvist G, Englund H, Nylund V: Measurement of hemoglobin Alc by a new liquid-chromatographic assay: methodology, clinical utility, and relation to glucose tolerance evaluated. Clin Chem. 1986, 32: 1867-1872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marre M, Claudel JP, Ciret P, Luis N, Suarez L, Passa P: Laser immunonephelometry for routine quantification of urinary albumin excretion. Clin Chem. 1987, 33: 209-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hixson JE, Vernier DT: Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with Hhal. J Lipid Res. 1990, 31: 545-548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Skobeleva NA, Vasina VI, Volkova MV, Sverdlova AM, Fomicheva EV, Obraztsova GI, Talalaeva El, Shakir K, Laasri M, Vorontsov IM, et al: DNA polymorphism of the APOB100, APOCIII, APOE, and angiotensin-converting enzyme genes and indicators of the lipid spectrum in children and adolescents in St. Petersburg. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 1997, 4: 36-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heesom AE, Hibberd ML, Millward A, Demaine AG: Polymorphism in the 5'-end of the aldose reductase gene is strongly associated with the development of diabetic nephropathy in type I diabetes. Diabetes. 1997, 46: 287-291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Doria A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Genetic predisposition to diabetic nephropathy. Evidence for a role of the angiotensin I – converting enzyme gene. Diabetes. 1994, 43: 690-695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ha SK, Seo JK: Insertion/deletion polymorphism in ACE gene as a predictor for progression of diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997, 60: S28-S32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fogarty DG, Zychma MJ, Scott LJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: The C825T polymorphism in the human G-protein beta3 subunit gene is not associated with diabetic nephropathy in Type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1998, 41: 1304-1308. 10.1007/s001250051069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Siffert W: G protein beta3 subunit 825T allele, hypertension, obesity, and diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000, 15: 1298-1306. 10.1093/ndt/15.9.1298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shcherbak NS, Schwartz El: The C825T polymorphism in the G-protein β3 subunit gene and diabetic complications in IDDM patients. Journal of Human Genetics. 2001, 46: 188-191. 10.1007/s100380170087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shcherbak NS, Shutskaya ZhV, Sheidina AM, Larionova VI, Schwartz El: Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Diabetic Nephropathy in IDDM Patients. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 1999, 68: 375-378. 10.1006/mgme.1999.2909.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kimura H, Suzuki Y, Gejyo F, Karasawa R, Miyazaki R, Suzuki S, Arakawa M: Apolipoprotein E4 reduces risk of diabetic nephropathy in patients with NIDDM. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998, 31: 666-673.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamow L, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Poirier 0, Cambien F, Hansen BV: Parving HH: Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and diabetic angiopathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000, 15: 625-630. 10.1093/ndt/15.5.625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Onuma T, Laffel LM, Angelico MC, Krolewski AS: Apolipoprotein E genotypes and risk of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996, 7: 1075-1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/backmatter/1471-2350-2-8-b1.pdf

Copyright

© Shcherbak; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.