Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence for classification of c.1852_1853AA>GC in MLH1 as a neutral variant for Lynch syndrome

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Stemmler
9 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Woods
3 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - José Luis Soto
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Stemmler
15 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Woods
27 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - José Luis Soto
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Stemmler
13 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - José Luis Soto
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - José Luis Soto
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2350-12-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement