Table 2 Normal vs. abnormal karyotypes of miscarriages according to conception methods
From: Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion after assisted reproductive treatment
| Â | Normal | Abnormal | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Male factor | Non-male factor | Total | Male factor | Non-male factor | Total | Â |
Total ICSI | 28 (43.75%) | 36 (56.25%) | 64 (45.71%) | 50 (65.79%)b | 26 (34.21%)b | 76 (54.29%)a | 140 |
   ICSI, ejaculated | 19 | 25 | 44 (43.56%) | 37 | 20 | 57 (56.44%) | 101 |
   ICSI, TESE | 3 | - | 3 (33.33%) | 6 | - | 6 (66.67%) | 9 |
   ICSI-TET | 5 | 1 | 6 (40%) | 5 | 4 | 9 (60%) | 15 |
   IVM | 1 | 10 | 11 (73.33%) | 2 | 2 | 4 (26.67%) | 15 |
Total conventional IVF | 51 (44.7%) | 63 (55.26%)a | 114 | ||||
   IVF-fresh | 33 | 55 | 88 | ||||
   IVF-TET | 18 | 8 | 26 | ||||
Control | 66 (51.56%) | 62 (48.44%)a | 128 | ||||
Total | 181 (47.38%) | 201 (52.62%) | 382 | ||||