Skip to main content

Table 2 T2D association for candidate SNPs in the Tunisian study sample of 1,397 individuals

From: Contribution of type 2 diabetes associated loci in the Arabic population from Tunisia: a case-control study

Gene SNP

Genotype

Control/T2D

Additive model1

OR (95% CI)

P

Dominant model2

OR (95% CI)

P

Recessive model3

OR (95% CI)

P*

TCF7L2 rs7903146

n

511/863

      
 

CC (1/1)

181/250

      
 

CT (1/2)

235/396

1.24 (0.95–1.61)

0.135

    
 

TT (2/2)

95/217

1.56 (1.13–2.16)

0.002

1.33 (1.04–1.70)

0.023

1.38 (1.04–1.83)

0.025

 

MAF (T)

0.42/0.48

1.25 (1.06–1.47)

0.006#

    

KCNJ11 rs5219

n

503/805

      
 

CC (1/1)

250/371

      
 

CT (1/2)

213/352

1.03 (0.80–1.31)

0.399

    
 

TT (2/2)

40/82

1.23 (0.80–1.90)

0.148

1.06 (0.84–1.34)

0.630

1.22 (0.80–1.85)

0.360

 

MAF (T)

0.29/0.32

1.07 (0.90–1.29)

0.440#

    

GCKrs1799884

n

505/865

      
 

GG (1/1)

324/552

      
 

GA (1/2)

157/272

1.01 (0.79–1.30)

0.939

    
 

AA (2/2)

24/41

1.20 (0.69–2.08)

0.902

1.03 (0.81–1.32)

0.780

1.20 (0.70–2.05)

0.510

 

MAF (A)

0.20/0.20

1.04 (0.86–1.28)

0.640#

    

HHEXrs7923837

n

504/795

      
 

GG (1/1)

271/448

      
 

GA (1/2)

200/292

0.88 (0.69–1.13)

0.661

    
 

AA (2/2)

33/55

0.97 (0.60–1.58)

0.934

0.89 (0.70–1.13)

0.340

1.03 (0.64–1.65)

0.910

 

MAF (A)

0.26/0.25

0.93 (0.77–1.13)

0.470#

    

ENPP1 rs1044498

n

499/809

      
 

AA (1/1)

228/402

      
 

AC (1/2)

205/311

0.86 (0.67–1.12)

0.243

    
 

CC (2/2)

66/96

0.78 (0.54–1.14)

0.326

0.84 (0.66–1.07)

0.160

0.84 (0.59–1.19)

0.320

 

MAF (C)

0.33/0.31

0.88 (0.74–1.04)

0.140#

    
  1. n: number of total subjects, MAF: Minor allele frequency, †,‡,*Genotype specific P values and OR are adjusted for age gender and BMI in each additive, dominant or recessive genetic model, respectively. #Allele-specific P values and OR of the log-additive genetic model are adjusted for age, gender and BMI.
  2. 1 Genetic additive model: 1/1 vs. 1/2 or 2/2 genotypes
  3. 2 Genetic dominant model: 1/1 vs. 1/2 + 2/2 genotypes
  4. 3 Genetic recessive model: 1/1 + 1/1 vs. 2/2 genotypes