Clinically proven mtDNA mutations are not common in those with chronic fatigue syndrome
- Elizna M. Schoeman†1,
- Francois H. Van Der Westhuizen†1,
- Elardus Erasmus1,
- Etresia van Dyk1,
- Charlotte V. Y. Knowles4,
- Shereen Al-Ali2, 3,
- Wan-Fai Ng2, 5,
- Robert W. Taylor4,
- Julia L. Newton2, 5 and
- Joanna L. Elson1, 6Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 October 2016
Accepted: 2 March 2017
Published: 16 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Callum Wilson|
|1 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rinki Murphy|
|6 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Elizna Schoeman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elizna M Schoeman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12881-017-0387-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.