Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Common variants of the TCF7L2gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a UK-resident South Asian population

  • Simon D Rees1Email author,
  • Srikanth Bellary1, 2,
  • Abigail C Britten1,
  • J Paul O'Hare3,
  • Sudhesh Kumar3,
  • Anthony H Barnett1, 2 and
  • M Ann Kelly1
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics20089:8

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-8

Received: 18 July 2007

Accepted: 21 February 2008

Published: 21 February 2008

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have implicated variants of the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene in genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus in several different populations. The aim of this study was to determine whether variants of this gene are also risk factors for type 2 diabetes development in a UK-resident South Asian cohort of Punjabi ancestry.

Methods

We genotyped four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TCF7L2 (rs7901695, rs7903146, rs11196205 and rs12255372) in 831 subjects with diabetes and 437 control subjects.

Results

The minor allele of each variant was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes; the greatest risk of developing the disease was conferred by rs7903146, with an allelic odds ratio (OR) of 1.31 (95% CI: 1.11 – 1.56, p = 1.96 × 10-3). For each variant, disease risk associated with homozygosity for the minor allele was greater than that for heterozygotes, with the exception of rs12255372. To determine the effect on the observed associations of including young control subjects in our data set, we reanalysed the data using subsets of the control group defined by different minimum age thresholds. Increasing the minimum age of our control subjects resulted in a corresponding increase in OR for all variants of the gene (p ≤ 1.04 × 10-7).

Conclusion

Our results support recent findings that TCF7L2 is an important genetic risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes in multiple ethnic groups.

Background

The search for genes associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus has frequently been complicated by small effect sizes and poor reproducibility between studies. The recent identification of common polymorphisms within the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene as risk factors for type 2 diabetes, however, provides fresh hope of unravelling the genetic basis of this complex disease. The association with a microsatellite marker (DG10S478) in intron 3 of TCF7L2 was first reported by Grant et al. [1] in Icelandic subjects and associations with surrogate markers were subsequently confirmed in several other populations [211]. Polymorphisms of the TCF7L2 gene demonstrate the strongest and most reproducible association with type 2 diabetes of any gene reported to date; recent large-scale meta-analyses by Florez [12] and Cauchi et al. [13] reveal associations between the TCF7L2 SNP rs7903146 and type 2 diabetes with p values of < 10-80 and ~10-140 respectively. The precise mechanisms by which this gene affects diabetes risk are not known, but it is thought to influence insulin secretion [8, 10, 11, 14], possibly through its role in the Wnt signalling pathway [7, 15], and may also affect insulin resistance [10, 11].

The South Asian population is genetically heterogeneous and is comprised of individuals originating from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. In UK-resident South Asian populations, type 2 diabetes is around 6 times more common than in the indigenous white Caucasian population, affecting over 10% of South Asian adults [16]. Despite the high risk of the disease, few studies have attempted to characterise its genetic basis in this ethnic group. Variants of TCF7L2 have been studied in two South Asian cohorts to date; a UK-resident population of South Indian origin [7] and a cohort from Pune, western India [11]. The gene has not previously been investigated in any population from the north of the Indian subcontinent. In this study, therefore, we investigated the association of common polymorphisms within the TCF7L2 gene with type 2 diabetes in a well-characterized UK-resident South Asian population of Punjabi ancestry, originating predominantly from the Mirpur area of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.

Methods

Type 2 diabetic subjects (N = 831) were recruited as part of the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study (UKADS), a multiple risk factor intervention trial investigating the impact of a culturally-sensitive, enhanced diabetes care package on the risk of cardiovascular disease in South Asian type 2 diabetes patients living in Birmingham and Coventry, UK. All subjects were of Punjabi ancestry, confirmed over three generations, and originated predominantly from the Mirpur area of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Diabetes was defined using the WHO criteria [17]. Ethnically-matched normoglycaemic control subjects (N = 437) were recruited from the same geographical areas through community screening. Information concerning the relatedness between any subjects in the study was not collected. Normal glucose tolerance was defined as fasting glucose < 6 mmol/l and 2 hr glucose < 7.8 mmol/l on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Where OGTT was not feasible, normal glucose tolerance was defined as random blood glucose < 7 mmol/l. Venous blood was collected from each subject after obtaining informed consent and genomic DNA extracted using an adaptation of the Nucleon® protocol (Nucleon Biosciences, Coatbridge, UK). The study was approved by the East Birmingham Research and Ethics Committee.

SNP selection and genotyping

We genotyped four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs: rs7901695, rs7903146, rs11196205 and rs12255372) that showed association with type 2 diabetes in the study by Grant et al. [1]. Genotyping was carried out using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) and fluorescence was measured using an ABI 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Genotyping success rate was 98.4%. Approximately 20% of the samples were re-genotyped to estimate error rate, which was zero for all SNPs.

Statistical analyses

Genotype frequencies for each SNP were checked for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using a X2 goodness-of-fit test. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) was estimated using Haploview version 3.2 [18]. Alleles and genotypes were tested for association with type 2 diabetes using logistic regression. Association between genotypes and continuous variables was tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significance of the relationship between odds ratio (OR) and minimum age threshold was determined using linear regression. All of the above statistical analyses were implemented in SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago IL). Power calculations were performed using Excel (Microsoft® Office Excel,© 2003).

Results

The clinical characteristics of the subjects in our study are shown in Table 1. Age of diagnosis, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HbA1c data were available for subjects with diabetes only. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and blood pressure measurements were available for both the diabetic group and 252 subjects from the control group.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of subjects studied

 

Diabetic subjects

Control subjects

n

831

437

Gender (M/F)

450/381

219/218

Age at study (years)

56.9 ± 12.1

55.0 ± 11.8

Age at diagnosis (years)

49.6 ± 11.9

N/Aa

BMI (kg/m 2 )

28.3 ± 4.7

28.1 ± 4.9b

Waist circumference (cm)

102.4 ± 10.7

99.8 ± 13.1b

Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

140.5 ± 20.9

135.7 ± 20.4b

Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

84.1 ± 11.5

85.1 ± 12.1b

HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.3 ± 0.5

NDc

HbA1c (%)

8.3 ± 1.9

NDc

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Mean age of control subjects at the time of the study was significantly greater than the mean age at diagnosis of the case subjects (p = 4.37 × 10-13). aN/A = not applicable. bBMI, waist circumference and blood pressure measurements were only available for 252 control subjects. cND = data not determined.

The pattern and strength of pairwise LD between SNPs (Figure 1) was similar to that seen in the CEPH (CEU) HapMap samples, Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe [19], and other previously published studies involving white Caucasian cohorts [5, 9, 20].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-9-8/MediaObjects/12881_2007_Article_302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the studied variants. LD estimated as r 2 using Haploveiw version 3.2. Strong LD is evident between all SNPs. The pattern of LD is similar to that shown in the CEPH (CEU) HapMap samples, Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe, and other previously published studies involving white Caucasian cohorts.

Statistical power, calculated using the number of subjects successfully genotyped, was greater than 80% for all SNPs with the exception of rs12255372. As the power of the association test for this SNP was 71.1%, we would not have been able to confidently accept the hypothesis of no association if the results had not been significant. Given the results of the present study, however, this finding is largely redundant in the context of our manuscript. It is interesting to note that, despite a smaller control group, both statistical power and the significance of the associations were greater when using a control group age cut-off of 46 years (power ≥ 94% and p ≤ 4.90 × 10-4 for all variants) compared to an age cut-off of 35 years.

Association results

In agreement with previous studies, the minor allele of each SNP was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (Table 2). The strongest association was seen for the variant rs7903146, with an allelic OR of 1.31 (95% CI 1.11 – 1.56, p = 1.96 × 10-3). For most variants, the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among minor allele homozygotes was greater than that among heterozygotes, supporting a multiplicative model of inheritance. This was not the case for rs12255372 (Table 2); however, the genotype distribution at this SNP did not conform to Hardy-Weinberg expectations in the control group (p = 0.02). There appeared to be an excess of minor allele homozygotes in this group, which may account for the lower than expected OR for this genotype. Genotypes of the variants studied were not significantly associated with any clinical, biochemical or morphological characteristic after correction for multiple testing. For all variants, within both the case and control groups, there was a trend suggesting that subjects with the rare allele homozygote genotypes had reduced BMI, although this did not reach statistical significance.
Table 2

Association of TCF7L2 variants with type 2 diabetes mellitus among UK-resident South Asians

SNP

Allele

Diabetic subjects Fa

Control subjects Fa

Genotype

Diabetic subjects n (%)b

Control subjects n (%)b

Allelic ORc (95% CI)

Het ORc,d (95% CI)

Hom ORc,d (95% CI)

 

T

0.65

0.71

TT

362 (43.7)

226 (51.7)

1.29 (1.09 – 1.54)

1.31 (1.02 – 1.68)

1.65 (1.12 – 2.44)

rs7901695

   

CT

355 (42.9)

169 (38.7)

   
 

C

0.35

0.29

CC

111 (13.4)

42 (9.6)

p = 3.60 × 10-3

p = 0.032

p = 0.012

 

C

0.64

0.71

CC

352 (42.5)

222 (51.4)

1.31 (1.11 – 1.56)

1.37 (1.07 – 1.76)

1.66 (1.13 – 2.44)

rs7903146

   

CT

360 (43.5)

166 (38.4)

   
 

T

0.36

0.29

TT

116 (14.0)

44 (10.2)

p = 1.96 × 10-3

p = 0.014

p = 9.74 × 10-3

 

G

0.53

0.59

GG

229 (27.5)

159 (36.5)

1.30 (1.11 – 1.54)

1.46 (1.12 – 1.89)

1.65 (1.18 – 2.30)

rs11196205

   

CG

417 (50.2)

199 (45.6)

   
 

C

0.47

0.41

CC

185 (22.3)

78 (17.9)

p = 1.10 × 10-3

p = 5.29 × 10-3

p = 3.33 × 10-3

 

G

0.68

0.73

GG

382 (46.8)

241 (55.4)

1.26 (1.05 – 1.51)

1.43 (1.11 – 1.83)

1.37 (0.92 – 2.05)

rs12255372

   

GT

346 (42.3)

153 (35.2)

   
 

T

0.32

0.27

TT

89 (10.9)

41 (9.4)

p = 3.60 × 10-3

p = 5.23 × 10-3

p = 0.127

aF = Allele frequency. bGenotype frequency expressed as number of individuals, n – values in parentheses indicate percentage. cOR = odds ratio, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. dGenotype odds ratios calculated compared with homozygotes for common allele; het OR = odds ratio for heterozygous genotype, hom OR = odds ratio for minor allele homozygous genotype. All values were calculated using the full dataset, the minimum age of control subjects being 35 years.

Effect of control group minimum age thresholds

As type 2 diabetes is a relatively late-onset disease, including young individuals within the control group could potentially interfere with association tests, due to the possibility that these individuals may develop the disease later in life. One commonly used method for minimising this problem is to ensure that the mean age of the control group is at least equal to the mean age at diagnosis of subjects with diabetes. In our study cohort, the mean age of the control group was significantly greater than the mean age at diagnosis of the diabetic group (55.0 vs. 49.6 years, p = 4.37 × 10-13, Table 1), suggesting that the age of control subjects was unlikely to influence our findings. To further explore the effect of including young control subjects on the strength of association, we compared the allelic ORs calculated for each SNP using subsets of our control group defined by different minimum age thresholds. When increasing minimum age thresholds were applied, there was a corresponding increase in OR up to an age cut-off of 46 years (p ≤ 1.04 × 10-7, Figure 2). When the minimum age was increased beyond this point, the relationship with OR deteriorated. It seems likely that this deterioration was due to decreasing numbers of control subjects as more individuals were dropped from the data set. The relationship between minimum age and OR was apparent for all variants, and on average the OR increased from 1.29, using an age cut-off of 35 years, to 1.45, using an age cut-off of 46 years.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-9-8/MediaObjects/12881_2007_Article_302_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Relationship between allelic odds ratio (OR) and control group minimum age threshold. Allelic OR is significantly associated with minimum age threshold for all variants: rs7901695 (r2 = 0.95, p = 8.01 × 10-8), rs7903146 (r2 = 0.95, p = 1.04 × 10-7), rs11196205 (r2 = 0.98, p = 1.18 × 10-9), rs12255372 (r2 = 0.95, p = 4.05 × 10-8).

Discussion

Our results provide important confirmation that variants of the TCF7L2 gene are strongly associated with type 2 diabetes in populations of South Asian origin, with similar effect sizes to those seen in white Caucasian populations. Two of the variants (rs7903146 and rs12255372) have been studied previously in South Asian cohorts [7, 11]. Allele frequencies for rs7903146 in our Punjabi population were similar to those reported in these studies, whereas the minor allele of rs12255372 appeared to be slightly more common in our cohort compared with these Indian populations.

Our data support the multiplicative model of inheritance for the TCF7L2 SNPs proposed by Grant et al. [1], except for the rs12255372 variant. This may be due to the minor departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium observed in the control group for this SNP. All samples were re-genotyped for rs12255372 using the same technique but with fresh reagents. To rule out the possibility that the observed excess of minor allele homozygotes in the control group was due to systematical genotyping error, all subjects in this group previously genotyped as TT were genotyped by RFLP, using primers designed with the web-based tool SNP Cutter [21] and the enzyme Tsp509 (details available upon request). The rationale behind this latter method was that any individual falsely genotyped as TT by the TaqMan method would be genotyped as CT or CC by the RFLP method. Neither method revealed any inconsistencies with the initial genotyping. It seems likely, therefore, that the minor departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is purely due to chance sampling. It is worth noting that Humphries et al. [7] found no statistically significant evidence for a multiplicative model of inheritance for this SNP in a South Indian population.

A recent paper [22] has shown that a TCF7L2 haplotype (HapBT2D), characterised by the presence of the rs7903146 T allele, is associated with decreased BMI in subjects with type 2 diabetes. In this study we observed a similar trend, replicated for the minor allele of all variants, although this did not reach statistical significance. Unlike Helgason et al., however, we observed this trend within both the case and control groups. More data will be needed to investigate this relationship further.

Data concerning the relatedness between subjects in the cohort were not available in this study. It is therefore possible that some individuals are genetically related to others in the cohort, leading to non-independence of genotypes. Such cryptic relatedness potentially increases the likelihood of obtaining a false positive result in tests of genetic association, and as such must be considered as a possible limitation of our study. Given the documented reproducibility of the association between TCF7L2 and type 2 diabetes, however, we do not believe that cryptic relatedness has affected the results presented in this manuscript.

Our study highlights the importance of implementing minimum age thresholds when selecting control subjects for genetic studies of type 2 diabetes. Not implementing these thresholds may produce an artificially low OR, as young individuals in the control group may develop type 2 diabetes later in life and are therefore not true controls. In our study this resulted in reduced statistical power (increasing the likelihood of false negative results), a factor which could become increasingly important when studying risk factors with smaller effect sizes. The effect that a control group minimum age threshold has on an association test will depend on the prevalence of disease in the studied population. The marked effect reported in this manuscript is probably due to the relatively high prevalence of type 2 diabetes in UK-resident South Asian populations, as young control subjects have a greater chance of later developing the disease. In other populations, such as those of white Caucasian origin, these thresholds may have a smaller effect.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results add to the rapidly expanding body of evidence that implicates TCF7L2 as an important risk factor for type 2 diabetes in multiple ethnic groups.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients and control subjects for agreeing to participate in this study. We are grateful to Dr. Anthony Dixon, Shanaz Mughal, Kam Johal and Tahera Mehrali for recruiting the study subjects and coordinating data collection, and to Karen Jones for helping with DNA extraction and quantitation. The United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study was supported by Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier Laboratories UK, MSD/Schering-Plough, Takeda UK, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Bristol Myers Squibb, Solvay Healthcare, Assurance Medical Society and Daiichi Sankyo.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham
(2)
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
(3)
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick

References

  1. Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Manolescu A, Sainz J, Helgason A, Stefansson H, Emilsson V, Helgadottir A, Styrkarsdottir U, Magnusson KP, Walters GB, Palsdottir E, Jonsdottir T, Gudmundsdottir T, Gylfason A, Saemundsdottir J, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Rader DJ, Bagger Y, Christiansen C, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Stefansson K: Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 320-323. 10.1038/ng1732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang C, Qi L, Hunter DJ, Meigs JB, Manson JE, van Dam RM, Hu FB: Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene and the risk of type 2 diabetes in large cohorts of U.S. women and men. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 2645-2648. 10.2337/db06-0643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang J, Kuusisto J, Vanttinen M, Kuulasmaa T, Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J, Uusitupa M, Laakso M: Variants of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene predict conversion to type 2 diabetes in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and are associated with impaired glucose regulation and impaired insulin secretion. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 1192-1200. 10.1007/s00125-007-0656-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV, Shiri-Sverdlov R, Zhernakova A, Strengman E, van Haeften TW, Hofker MH, Wijmenga C: Association of variants of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the Dutch Breda cohort. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 59-62. 10.1007/s00125-006-0477-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott LJ, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, Sprau AG, Jackson AU, Narisu N, Duren WL, Chines PS, Stringham HM, Erdos MR, Valle TT, Tuomilehto J, Bergman RN, Mohlke KL, Collins FS, Boehnke M: Association of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) variants with type 2 diabetes in a Finnish sample. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 2649-2653. 10.2337/db06-0341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mayans S, Lackovic K, Lindgren P, Ruikka K, Agren A, Eliasson M, Holmberg D: TCF7L2 polymorphisms are associated with type 2 diabetes in northern Sweden. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007, 15: 342-346. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201773.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Humphries SE, Gable D, Cooper JA, Ireland H, Stephens JW, Hurel SJ, Li KW, Palmen J, Miller MA, Cappuccio FP, Elkeles R, Godsland I, Miller GJ, Talmud PJ: Common variants in the TCF7L2 gene and predisposition to type 2 diabetes in UK European Whites, Indian Asians and Afro-Caribbean men and women. J Mol Med. 2006, 84: 1-10. 10.1007/s00109-005-0725-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Loos RJ, Franks PW, Francis RW, Barroso I, Gribble FM, Savage DB, Ong KK, O'Rahilly S, Wareham NJ: TCF7L2 polymorphisms modulate proinsulin levels and {beta}-cell function in a British Europid population. Diabetes. 2007, 56: 1943-1947. 10.2337/db07-0055.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N, Pollin TI, de Bakker PI, Shuldiner AR, Knowler WC, Nathan DM, Altshuler D: TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 241-250. 10.1056/NEJMoa062418.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Damcott CM, Pollin TI, Reinhart LJ, Ott SH, Shen H, Silver KD, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR: Polymorphisms in the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene are associated with type 2 diabetes in the Amish: replication and evidence for a role in both insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 2654-2659. 10.2337/db06-0338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandak GR, Janipalli CS, Bhaskar S, Kulkarni SR, Mohankrishna P, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM, Yajnik CS: Common variants in the TCF7L2 gene are strongly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Indian population. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 63-67. 10.1007/s00125-006-0502-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Florez JC: The new type 2 diabetes gene TCF7L2. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007, 10: 391-396. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3281e2c9be.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cauchi S, El Achhab Y, Choquet H, Christian D, Krempler F, Weitgasser R, Nejjari C, Patsch W, Chikri M, Meyre D, Froguel P: TCF7L2 is reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes in various ethnic groups: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2007, 85: 777-782. 10.1007/s00109-007-0203-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Saxena R, Gianniny L, Burtt NP, Lyssenko V, Giuducci C, Sjogren M, Florez JC, Almgren P, Isomaa B, Orho-Melander M, Lindblad U, Daly MJ, Tuomi T, Hirschhorn JN, Ardlie KG, Groop LC, Altshuler D: Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in TCF7L2 are reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes and reduce the insulin response to glucose in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 2890-2895. 10.2337/db06-0381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith U: TCF7L2 and type 2 diabetes-we WNT to know. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 5-7. 10.1007/s00125-006-0521-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnett AH, Dixon AN, Bellary S, Hanif MW, O'Hare JP, Raymond NT, Kumar S: Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk in the UK south Asian community. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 2234-2246. 10.1007/s00125-006-0325-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. WHO Consultation: Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its complications, Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the WHO Consultation. 1999, Geneva: World Health Organisation-Google Scholar
  18. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. The International HapMap Consortium: The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003, 426: 789-796. 10.1038/nature02168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cauchi S, Meyre D, Dina C, Choquet H, Samson C, Gallina S, Balkau B, Charpentier G, Pattou F, Stetsyuk V, Scharfmann R, Staels B, Fruhbeck G, Froguel P: Transcription factor TCF7L2 genetic study in the French population: expression in human beta-cells and adipose tissue and strong association with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 2903-2908. 10.2337/db06-0474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang R, Zhu Z, Zhu H, Nguyen T, Yao F, Xia K, Liang D, Liu C: SNP Cutter: a comprehensive tool for SNP PCR-RFLP assay design. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W489-W492. 10.1093/nar/gki358.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Helgason A, Palsson S, Thorleifsson G, Grant SF, Emilsson V, Gunnarsdottir S, Adeyemo A, Chen Y, Chen G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Hinney A, Hansen T, Andersen G, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, Schafer H, Faruque M, Doumatey A, Zhou J, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Rader DJ, Bagger Y, Christiansen C, Sigurdsson G, Hebebrand J, Pedersen O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Rotimi C, Stefansson K: Refining the impact of TCF7L2 gene variants on type 2 diabetes and adaptive evolution. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 218-225. 10.1038/ng1960.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/9/8/prepub

Copyright

© Rees et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement