β3-adrenergic receptor gene, body mass index, bone mineral density and fracture risk in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES)

  • Claire Y Wang1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Nguyen D Nguyen1Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Nigel A Morrison3,

        Affiliated with

        • John A Eisman1, 2,

          Affiliated with

          • Jacqueline R Center1 and

            Affiliated with

            • Tuan V Nguyen1, 2Email author

              Affiliated with

              BMC Medical Genetics20067:57

              DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-7-57

              Received: 31 March 2006

              Accepted: 05 July 2006

              Published: 05 July 2006

              Abstract

              Background

              Recent studies have suggested that the Arg allele of β3-adrenergic receptor (ADRB3) gene is associated with body mass index (BMI), which is an important predictor of bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. However, whether the ADRB3 gene polymorphism is associated with fracture risk has not been investigated. The aim of study was to examine the inter-relationships between ADRB3 gene polymorphisms, BMI, BMD and fracture risk in elderly Caucasians.

              Methods

              Genotypes of the ADRB3 gene were determined in 265 men and 446 women aged 60+ in 1989 at entry into the study, whose BMD were measured by DXA (GE Lunar, WI USA) at baseline. During the follow-up period (between 1989 and 2004), fractures were ascertained by reviewing radiography reports and personal interviews.

              Results

              The allelic frequencies of the Trp and the Arg alleles were 0.925 and 0.075 respectively, and the relative frequencies of genotypes Trp/Trp, Trp/Arg and Arg/Arg 0.857, 0.138 and 0.006 respectively. There was no significant association between BMI and ADRB3 genotypes (p = 0.10 in women and p = 0.68 in men). There was also no significant association between ADRB3 genotypes and lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD in either men and women. Furthermore, there were no significant association between ADRB3 genotypes and fracture risk in both women and men, either before or after adjusting for and, BMD and BMI.

              Conclusion

              The present data suggested that in Caucasian population the contribution of ADRB3 genotypes to the prediction of BMI, BMD and fracture risk is limited

              Background

              Osteoporosis and obesity are two common disorders that affect a large number of elderly in the general population [13]. Approximately 30% of women and 12% of men are affected by osteoporosis or low bone mass at some point during life [4]. Moreover, about 31% of elderly men and 35% of elderly women are classified as having obesity in the US [5]. Several lines of epidemiologic evidence suggest that the two disorders may be inversely associated, with obese individuals having higher bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced risk of fracture than non-obese individuals [611]. Indeed, it has been well-known that between 23% and 47% variance of BMD in the general population can be "explained" by the variation in body mass index (BMI) [12, 13], making BMI one of the most robust and consistent predictors of BMD [14]. Both body weight (or BMI) and BMD are partly genetically determined. Twin studies have suggested that genetic factors may account for up to 80% of the BMD variance [1517]. Likewise, between 43 to 70% of BMI variance is attributable to genetic factors [18, 19]. Under the hypothesis of shared genetic effects, a gene that is associated with BMI may also protect against osteoporosis.

              The variation in BMD is mainly attributable to genetic factors [16, 17, 20] and the liability to osteoporotic fracture is also partly determined by genetic factor [2123]. Experimental evidence suggested that β3-adrenergic stimulation can induce expression of osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoblast cells, leading to a stimulation of osteoclastogenesis [24]. Moreover, the activation of β3-adrenergic receptors on two osteoblast-like cells can cause bone resorption in intact mouse calvariae [25]. In epidemiological studies, the β3-adrenergic receptor (ADRB3) polymorphisms have been found to be associated with BMI [26] and BMD [27]. However, such associations, while largely found in the Japanese population, have not been well studied in Caucasian populations. Moreover, the association between ADRB3 polymorphisms and fracture risk, the ultimate outcome of osteoporosis has not been reported. The present study was aimed at examining the inter-relationships between ADRB3 gene polymorphisms, body mass index, bone mineral density and fracture risk in a well-defined sample of elderly Caucasians.

              Methods

              Study design and setting

              The present study was part of the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES), of which the details of study design and protocols have been described previously [2830]. Briefly, DOES is a community-based, epidemiological study, where participants were recruited from the Dubbo city, a semi-urban city 400 km northwest of Sydney, Australia, with a population of approximately 32 000 people, 98.6% Caucasian, of whom 1 581 men and 2 095 women were aged 60 years or above in 1989. Dubbo's relative isolation in terms of medical care allows virtually complete ascertainment of all fractures. From 1993, blood samples were collected from individuals who volunteer to donate at initial visits or follow-up visits. Our present study reports data on a random sample of 446 women and 265 men aged 60 years or above in 1989, who had consented to donate blood for DNA analysis.

              Measurements

              After obtaining written informed consent, participants were interviewed by a trained research nurse at initial and subsequent visits at approximately 2-year intervals. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data including age, anthropometric variables, life style and clinical data [31]. Bone mineral density (g/cm2) was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a Lunar DPX-L densitometer (GE Lunar, WI. USA). The measurement was performed at the same visit or within one month of the blood sample collection in 99% of cases. In the cases in which the blood was taken at a time other than the scheduled visit, the BMD used was that closest to the time of blood collection.

              Ascertainment of fracture

              The incidence of fracture was ascertained during the study period (1989–2004) by radiologist's report and confirmed by personal interview. Only low trauma fractures were included (i.e. a fall from the standing height or less). Fractures due to motor vehicle accidents or pathological conditions were excluded. Fractures were categorised into 4 groups: hip, symptomatic vertebral, Colles' and other fractures.

              Genotyping

              Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. The ADRB3 polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed with 20 ng of genomic DNA with upstream primer 5' CCA GTG GGC TGC CGA GGG 3' and downstream primer 5' GCC AGT GGC GCC CAA CGG 3' [32]. The amplification products were digested with the restriction enzyme BstOI (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and genotyped as Trp homozygotes (Trp/Trp), heterozygotes (Trp/Arg), or Arg homozygotes (Arg/Arg). This Trp64Arg polymorphism has been commonly used in genetic epidemiological studies.

              Statistical analysis

              Alleles were counted and the genotype frequencies of the polymorphism was checked for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) by the likelihood Chi-square statistic [33]. The baseline characteristics of the subjects in the fracture group and the non-fracture group were compared using descriptive statistical tests with appropriate techniques (e.g. Student's t-test for normally distributed variables, such as BMI and BMD) and Chi-square (for categorical data), depends on the distribution of the variables. The association between each polymorphism and BMD or BMI was analyzed by the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model taking into account the effects of potential covariates such as age, weight and life-style factors.

              In order to quantify the risk of sustaining a fracture in relation to ADRB3 genotypes, subjects were grouped into those with Arg allele and those without Arg allele. The association was analyzed by the logistic regression model taking into account the effects of potential confounders.

              In order to determine the association between BMI and ADRB3 polymorphisms, a Bayesian approach was used [34, 35]. In the Bayesian analysis, the currently observed data are combined with known data to derive a "posterior distribution" with credible interval. In the present study, a prior mean difference (M0) in BMI between subjects with and without Arg allele was obtained from a meta-analysis [26] with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI) being (L0, U0), from which the standard deviation (SD0) for the prior distribution was calculated as follow: SD0 = (U0- L0)/3.92, assuming the difference follows the normal distribution. In order to construct a posterior distribution with mean (Mp) and standard deviation (SDp), the prior distribution was combined with the present study's data, which has a mean of Md and standard deviation of SDd. The posterior mean and SD are: Mp =(SDp)2 [(M0/SD0 2)+(Md/SDd 2)] and SD p = 1/ http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-7-57/MediaObjects/12881_2006_Article_165_IEq1_HTML.gif . Thus, the posterior mean is a weighted average of two estimates (prior mean and the present study's mean) with the weight being the inverse variances. The analysis was conducted via the SAS system [36].

              Results

              Characteristics of study subjects

              In total, 446 women and 265 men who had been followed-up for the median of 13.2 years (interquartile range, IQR: 10.4–14.1) and 12.9 years (IQR: 9.0–14.0) for women and men, respectively.

              The frequencies of the Trp/Trp, Trp/Arg and Arg/Arg genotypes were 385 (86.3%), 58 (13.0%) and 3 (0.7%) respectively for women, and 224 (84.5), 40 (15.1%) and 1 (0.4%) respectively for men. In both sexes, the allelic frequencies of Trp allele and Arg allele were 0.925 and 0.075 respectively. Because the frequency of Arg allele was low in the population, individuals with Trp/Arg and Arg/Arg genotypes were considered as one group. The overall genotype distribution in the study subjects was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 0.007, p = 0.98).

              Clinical characteristics of subjects were stratified by the presence or absence of Arg allele (Table 1). The presence of Arg allele in women is associated with a 0.25 SD increase in body weight, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). In both women and men, there were no statistically significant differences between Arg allele carriers and non-carriers in terms of anthropometric characteristics and lifestyle factors.
              Table 1

              Baseline characteristics of subjects stratified by ADRB3 genotype

               

              Trp/Trp

              Trp/Arg + Arg/Arg

              Standardized difference

              P value

              Women (N)

              385

              61

                

                 Age (y)

              71 ± 8

              71 ± 6

              0.00

              0.47

                 Weight (kg)

              64 ± 12

              67 ± 13

              0.25

              0.08

                 Height (cm)

              160 ± 6

              160 ± 6

              0.00

              0.90

                 BMI (kg/m2)

              25 ± 5

              26 ± 5

              0.20

              0.10

                 Ca intake (mg/day)

              644 ± 372

              650 ± 355

              0.02

              0.90

                 Physical activity (METs)

              80 ± 30

              82 ± 23

              0.07

              0.54

                 Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)

              0.76 ± 0.13

              0.79 ± 0.13

              0.23

              0.24

                 Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2)

              1.00 ± 0.18

              1.04 ± 0.21

              0.22

              0.11

                 Age of menopause (y)

              47 ± 7

              46 ± 7

              -0.14

              0.52

                 Current/ex smoker a,b

              106 (27.5)

              22 (36.1)

               

              1.87

              Men (N)

              224

              41

                

                 Age (y)

              70 ± 6

              68 ± 5

              -0.34

              0.12

                 Weight (kg)

              78 ± 12

              77 ± 13

              -0.08

              0.46

                 Height (cm)

              174 ± 6

              173 ± 8

              -0.16

              0.77

                 BMI (kg/m2)

              26 ± 3

              26 ± 4

              0.00

              0.68

                 Ca intake (mg/day)

              657 ± 367

              732 ± 317

              0.21

              0.23

                 Physical activity (METs)

              76 ± 49

              72 ± 48

              -0.08

              0.69

                 Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)

              0.92 ± 0.15

              0.93 ± 0.15

              0.07

              0.63

                 Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2)

              1.26 ± 0.21

              1.24 ± 0.24

              -0.09

              0.59

                 Current/ex smoker a,b

              122 (54.5)

              25 (61.0)

               

              0.59

              Values are mean ± SD, otherwise specified; P values were calculated using unpaired t-test, otherwise specified. BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; METs, metabolic equivalents.

              a N(%); bChi-square test.

              ADRB3 genotypes and BMI

              In the present study, there was no significant association between ADRB3 genotypes and BMI. The overall mean difference in BMI for Arg carriers versus non-carriers was 0.54 kg/m2 (95% CI: -0.35, 1.44; P = 0.23), or 0.13 SD. In a previous meta-analysis [26], Arg carriers had higher BMI than non-Arg carriers by 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13–0.47) kg/m2 as indicated in the prior distribution (Figure 1). After updating the previous data with the present study's data, the posterior distribution showed that BMI in the Arg allele carriers are, on average, 0.31 kg/m2 (95% CI, 0.14–0.48) higher than non-Arg carriers.
              http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-7-57/MediaObjects/12881_2006_Article_165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
              Figure 1

              Posterior distribution of mean difference in BMI (kg/m2) between Arg carriers and non-Arg carriers.

              ADRB3 genotypes and BMD

              In multiple regression analysis of BMD measurements at both lumbar spine and femoral neck (Table 2), there were no significant associations between ADRB3 and BMD at both LS and FN sites. However, in both women and men, age and smoking history were negatively associated with femoral neck BMD, and BMI was positively associated with lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD. Although increased physical activity was not associated with BMD measured at femoral neck, it was positively associated with lumbar spine BMD. Collectively these factors (age, BMI, smoking history, calcium intake, physical activity and ADRB3 genotypes) explained about 30% and 12% of variances in femoral neck BMD in women and men respectively.
              Table 2

              ADRB3 genotype and BMD: Standardized regression coefficient from the multiple regression analyses

               

              LSBMD

              FNBMD

               

              Coefficient

              P value

              Coefficient

              P value

              Women

                  

                 Age

              -0.040

              0.380

              -0.344

              <0.01

                 BMI

              0.366

              <0.01

              0.382

              <0.01

                 Smoking

              -0.041

              0.37

              -0.087

              0.03

                 Calcium intake

              -0.018

              0.69

              0.050

              0.23

                 Physical activity

              0.140

              <0.01

              0.035

              0.40

                 ADRB3a

              0.044

              0.33

              0.046

              0.26

                 R2

              0.162

               

              0.302

               

              Men

                  

                 Age

              -0.018

              0.78

              -0.187

              <0.01

                 BMI

              0.231

              <0.01

              0.240

              <0.01

                 Smoking

              -0.104

              0.09

              -0.149

              <0.01

                 Calcium intake

              0.091

              0.14

              0.048

              0.01

                 Physical activity

              0.124

              0.05

              0.036

              0.43

                 ADRB3a

              0.001

              0.99

              0.003

              0.60

                 R2

              0.074

               

              0.120

               

              LSBMD, lumbar spine bone mineral density; FNBMD, femoral neck bone mineral density.

              R2: coefficient of determination; proportion of variance of BMD (LSBMD or FNBMD) accounted for by all the factors in the model. aNon-Arg allele carrier and Arg allele carrier.

              ADRB3 genotypes and fracture risk

              During the follow up period, 173 women and 49 men had sustained at least one osteoporotic fracture. In women, the most common fracture site was distal radius (Colles' fracture) with an incidence rate of 24% of all the cases, followed by vertebral (23%) and hip (14%). In men, the most common fracture site was vertebrae (41%), followed by hip (16%) and ribs (14%). For both women and men, fracture individuals were older, weighed less, and had lower BMD at both femoral neck and lumbar spine compared to their non-fracture counterparts (Table 3). However, there was no significant difference between the fracture group and non-fracture group in terms of calcium intake, physical activity and smoking history.
              Table 3

              Baseline characteristics of subjects with and without fracture

               

              Any fracture

              Non-fracture

              Mean difference (95% CI)

              SDa

              P value

              Women

                   

              Number of subjects

              173

              273

                 

              Age (y)

              72 ± 8

              70 ± 7

              1.86 (0.46, 3.226)

              0.27

              <0.01

              Weight (kg)

              63 ± 12

              66 ± 12

              -2.76 (-5.14, -0.38)

              -0.25

              0.03

              Height (cm)

              159 ± 7

              160 ± 6

              -0.89 (-2.06, 0.27)

              -0.16

              0.13

              BMI (kg/m2)

              25 ± 4

              26 ± 5

              -0.88 (-1.76, 0)

              -0.22

              0.05

              Ca intake (mg/day)

              640 ± 379

              648 ± 364

              -7.70 (-78.93, 63.52)

              -0.02

              0.83

              Physical activity (METs)

              83 ± 32

              79 ± 27

              3.67 (-1.99, 9.32)

              0.14

              0.20

              Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)

              0.72 ± 0.12

              0.80 ± 0.13

              -0.07 (-0.10, -0.05)

              -0.63

              <0.01

              Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2)

              0.95 ± 0.17

              1.04 ± 0.19

              -0.09 (-0.12, -0.05)

              -0.49

              <0.01

              Age of menopause (y)

              46 ± 8

              47 ± 7

              -1.46 (-2.86, -0.06)

              -0.14

              0.04

              Current/ex smoker b,c

              46 (26.6)

              82 (30.0)

                

              0.43

              Men

                   

              Number of subjects

              49

              216

                 

              Age (y)

              73 ± 6

              69 ± 6

              3.54 (1.73, 5.36)

              0.67

              <0.01

              Weight (kg)

              75 ± 11

              79 ± 12

              -4.05 (-7.81, -0.29)

              -0.34

              0.03

              Height (cm)

              171 ± 7

              174 ± 6

              -2.75 (-4.82, -0.69)

              -0.48

              0.01

              BMI (kg/m2)

              25 ± 3

              26 ± 4

              -0.54 (-1.64, 0.55)

              -0.26

              0.33

              Ca intake (mg/day)

              693 ± 475

              663 ± 330

              29.77 (-83.66, 143.19)

              0.08

              0.61

              Physical activity (METs)

              84 ± 53

              73 ± 47

              11.19 (-4.59, 26.98)

              0.23

              0.16

              Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)

              0.85 ± 0.13

              0.94 ± 0.15

              -0.09 (-0.14, -0.05)

              -0.61

              <0.01

              Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2)

              1.14 ± 0.20

              1.28 ± 0.21

              -0.14 (-0.21, -0.07)

              -0.67

              <0.01

              Current/ex smoker b, c

              33 (67.3)

              114 (52.8)

                

              0.06

              Values are mean ± SD, otherwise specified; P values are calculated using unpaired t-test, otherwise specified. BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; METs, metabolic equivalents;

              a Standardized difference; bChi-square test; cN(%).

              The distribution of ADRB3 genotypes in fracture and non-fracture subjects is shown in Table 4. Women with the Arg/Arg and Trp/Arg genotypes had lower incident rate of any fracture than those with the Trp/Trp genotype, but the difference was not statistically significant (32.8% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.30). This non-significant association was observed for all specific fracture sites. However, in men, individuals with the Arg/Arg and Trp/Arg genotypes had higher incident rate of any fracture than those with the Trp/Trp genotype (22.0% vs. 17.9%); the difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.53). After adjusting for age, BMI and/or BMD, the associations between the ADRB3 polymorphism and fracture risk in women and men were not statistically significant (Table 5). There were no interaction effects between ADRB3 genotypes and age on fracture risk (data not shown).
              Table 4

              Frequency of fracture types stratified by β3-Adrenergic Receptor genotype

               

              Genotype

              P valuea

               

              Trp/Trp

              Arg/Arg+

               
                

              Trp/Arg

               

              Women (N)

              385

              61

               

              Non-fracture

              232 (60.3)

              41 (67.2)

               

              Any fracture

              153 (39.7)

              20 (32.8)

              0.30

              Hip fracture

              37 (13.8)

              4 (8.9)

              0.66b

              Vertebral fracture

              53 (18.6)

              5 (10.9)

              0.23

              Wrist/forearm

              54 (18.9)

              5 (10.9)

              0.21

              Men (N)

              224

              41

               

              Non-fracture

              184 (82.1)

              32 (78.1)

               

              Any fracture

              40 (17.9)

              9 (22.0)

              0.53

              Hip fracture

              8 (4.2)

              2 (5.9)

              0.66b

              Vertebral fracture

              17 (8.5)

              5 (13.5)

              0.33

              Wrist/forearm

              3 (1.6)

              1 (3.0)

              0.49b

              aChi-square test, otherwise specified; bFisher's exact test

              Table 5

              Relationship between β3-Adrenergic Receptor genotypes and fracture risk

               

              Any fracture

              Hip fracture

              Vertebral fracture

              Wrist/forearmb

              Women

                  

              ADRB3 unadjusteda

              0.74 (0.42, 1.31)

              0.66 (0.23,1.92)

              0.56 (0.21, 1.46)

              0.55 (0.21, 1.43)

              Adjusted for age (1)

              0.72 (0.40, 1.28)

              0.66 (0.22,1.96)

              0.55 (0.21, 1.43)

              0.54 (0.21, 1.42)

              Adjusted for FNBMD (2)

              0.84 (0.46, 1.55)

              0.83 (0.25, 2.77)

              0.62 (0.24, 1.64)

              0.61 (0.23, 1.61)

              Adjusted for BMI (3)

              0.76 (0.42, 1.37)

              0.82 (0.27, 2.44)

              0.60 (0.23, 1.56)

              0.57 (0.22, 1.50)

              Adjusted for (1) and (2)

              0.84 (0.45, 1.55)

              0.78 (0.23, 2.61)

              0.60 (0.23, 1.58)

              0.61 (0.23, 1.60)

              Adjusted for (1) and (3)

              0.74 (0.41, 1.33)

              0.70 (0.23, 2.16)

              0.57 (0.22, 1.51)

              0.56 (0.22, 1.48)

              Adjusted for (1) and (2) and (3)

              0.83 (0.45, 1.53)

              0.75 (0.22, 2.56)

              0.60 (0.23, 1.59)

              0.61 (0.23, 1.60)

              Men

                  

              ADRB3 unadjusteda

              1.29 (0.57, 2.92)

              1.39 (0.28, 6.76)

              1.69 (0.59, 4.88)

              1.84 0.19, 18.18)

              Adjusted for age (1)

              1.57 (0.68, 3.65)

              2.87 (0.50, 16.39)

              2.03 (0.69, 6.02)

              -

              Adjusted for FNBMD (2)

              1.25 (0.52, 3.04)

              1.47 (0.29, 7.46)

              1.88 (0.62, 5.71)

              -

              Adjusted for BMI (3)

              1.28 (0.56, 2.89)

              1.34 (0.27, 6.58)

              1.66 (0.57, 4.78)

              -

              Adjusted for (1) and (2)

              1.47 (0.60, 3.62)

              3.03 (0.52, 17.54)

              2.15 (0.69, 6.67)

              -

              Adjusted for (1) and (3)

              1.57 (0.67, 3.65)

              2.85 (0.50, 16.39)

              2.02 (0.68, 6.02)

              -

              Adjusted for (1) and (2) and (3)

              1.46 (0.59, 3.62)

              2.88 (0.48, 7.24)

              2.15 (0.69, 6.67)

              -

              Values are Odds ratio and 95% CI;

              aArg-allele carriers were considered the risk factor in the model and Trp/Trp genotype was the reference group.

              badjusted OR was not calculated for wrist/forearm fracture in men due to small number of fracture.

              Discussion

              Obesity is associated with increased BMD and reduced fracture risk [11, 37]. Studies on polymorphisms of the ADRB3 gene and their association with BMD have been reported in the Japanese population [27, 38], but not in Caucasians. The present data further suggested that there was no significant association between ADRB3 genotypes and fracture risk in a Caucasian population.

              The ADRB3 genotypes have largely been investigated for association with BMI in the Japanese population, from whom a significant association has been reported. The association was characterised by individuals with the Arg allele having higher BMI than individuals without the Arg allele. In this study, individuals with the Arg allele also had higher BMI than individuals without the Arg allele, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Nevertheless, by using the Bayesian approach (i.e., updating the current data with previous data) it was found that there was a 99% probability that BMI among those with the Arg allele was higher than those without the Arg allele.

              The frequency of the Arg allele in the present study was similar to that reported for the Australian population [39] and other Caucasian populations [40, 41], but lower than that of Asian populations [27, 4244]. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the association between ADRB3 genotypes and BMD and fracture risk in Caucasian population.

              The present results suggest there was no statistically significant association between ADRB3 genotypes and BMD. This is consistent with previous findings in Japanese women [27, 38] (Table 6). It has been suggested that the association between ADRB3 and BMD are more likely to be found in obese individuals than in non-obese individuals. However, in the present study, the non-significant association between ADRB3 and BMD was observed in both obese and non-obese individuals (data not shown).
              Table 6

              β3AR genotypes and bone mineral density: summary of previous and present studies

              First Author and genotypes

              N (%)

              Femoral neck BMD (mean; SD)

              Lumbar spine BMD (mean; SD)

              Total body BMD (mean; SD)

              Ogawa et al. [38]a

                  

              Trp/Trp and Trp/Arg

              267 (95.4)

              NA

              0.145 (1.36)

              0.432 (0.93)

              Arg/Arg

              13 (4.6)

              NA

              0.179 (2.11)

              -0.135 (0.93)

              P-value

               

              NA

              NS

              0.033

              Kasumata et al. [27]b

                  

              Trp/Trp and Trp/Arg

              142 (97.6)

              NA

              NA

              NA

              Arg/Arg

              3 (2.4)

              NA

              NA

              NA

              P-value

               

              NS

              NS

              NA

              The present study

                  

              Trp/Trp

              385 (86.3)

              0.76 (0.13)

              1.00 (0.18)

              NA

              Trp/Arg and Arg/Arg

              61 (13.7)

              0.79 (0.13)

              1.04 (0.21)

              NA

              P-value

               

              0.238

              0.113

              NA

              NA, not available; NS, non-significant. aValues were shown as Z-scores BMD. b Data were not shown; the authors only stated in text: "No association was demonstrated between the ER, CaSR or β3-AR genotypes and BMD, either alone or in relation to other polymorphisms".

              In this current study, no significant association was observed in either sex. However, while women with the Arg allele appeared to have lower risk of fracture, men with the Arg allele had increased risk of fracture. The reason for this opposite trend was not apparent; however, stochastic fluctuation can be a contributory factor.

              BMD is largely determined by genetic factors [45], and as BMI is a strong predictor of BMD [14], we thus hypothesized that ADRB3, being a candidate gene for BMI, would have pleiotropic effect on both BMD and BMI. However, the present results did not support the hypothesis, and the effect of ADRB3 seemed to be BMI specific, and the effect of ADRB3 on BMI showed a 0.31 kg/m2 difference between genotypes.

              The present study was based on a relatively large sample size which has been followed up for a reasonably long period of time (up to 15 years), which allows more precise delineation of effect than smaller studies. Moreover, subjects in this study are of Caucasian background, and the present results are likely to be valid in similar populations of elderly Caucasians. However, a potential limitation is that with the low prevalence of the Arg allele in the ADRB3 gene there are small numbers of subjects with the Arg/Arg genotype. Since fracture is a relatively rare event, the lack of fracture cases in individuals with Arg allele could limit the power of the study.

              Furthermore, this study examined only one polymorphism which may not adequately capture the polymorphic variation within the gene, and hence limited the chance of finding an underlying association. There is also a lack of association studies investigating the relationship between ADRB3 genotypes and BMD, and no studies have investigated the association between ADRB3 genotypes and fracture risk, therefore no prior information could be drawn to reinforce our findings via the Bayesian approach.

              Conclusion

              In summary, the present data suggested that in elderly men and women, there is a weak positive association between Arg allele of the ADRB3 gene and BMI. However, no significant associations were observed between ADRB3 polymorphisms and BMD or fracture risk, and it seems unlikely that ADRB3 has a significant predictive value for osteoporotic fracture risk.

              Abbreviations

               : 

              All abbreviations are defined in the text

              Declarations

              Acknowledgements

              We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Sr Janet Watters and Donna Reeves for the interview, data collection and measurement bone mineral density. We also appreciate the invaluable help of the staff of Dubbo base hospital. This works has been partly supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and untied educational grants from GE-Lunar, Merck Australia, Eli Lilly International and Aventis Australia.

              Authors’ Affiliations

              (1)
              Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales
              (2)
              Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales
              (3)
              School of Medical Science, Griffith University

              References

              1. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH: Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2005,293(15):1861–1867.View ArticlePubMed
              2. Andreyeva T, Sturm R, Ringel JS: Moderate and severe obesity have large differences in health care costs. Obes Res 2004,12(12):1936–1943.View ArticlePubMed
              3. Kumanyika S, Jeffery RW, Morabia A, Ritenbaugh C, Antipatis VJ: Obesity prevention: the case for action. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002,26(3):425–436.View ArticlePubMed
              4. Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N: The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994,9(8):1137–1141.View ArticlePubMed
              5. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM: Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 2004,291(23):2847–2850.View ArticlePubMed
              6. Pruzansky ME, Turano M, Luckey M, Senie R: Low body weight as a risk factor for hip fracture in both black and white women. J Orthop Res 1989,7(2):192–197.View ArticlePubMed
              7. Turner LW, Wang MQ, Fu Q: Risk factors for hip fracture among southern older women. South Med J 1998,91(6):533–540.PubMed
              8. del Puente A, Postiglione A, Esposito-del Puente A, Carpinelli A, Romano M, Oriente P: Peripheral body fat has a protective role on bone mineral density in elderly women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998,52(9):690–693.View ArticlePubMed
              9. Margolis KL, Ensrud KE, Schreiner PJ, Tabor HK: Body size and risk for clinical fractures in older women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 2000,133(2):123–127.PubMed
              10. Shiraki M, Ito H, Fujimaki H, Higuchi T: Relation between body size and bone mineral density with special reference to sex hormones and calcium regulating hormones in elderly females. Endocrinol Jpn 1991,38(4):343–349.PubMed
              11. Nguyen ND, Pongchaiyakul C, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV: Abdominal fat and hip fracture risk in the elderly: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005,6(1):11.View ArticlePubMed
              12. Orozco P, Nolla JM: Associations between body morphology and bone mineral density in premenopausal women. Eur J Epidemiol 1997,13(8):919–924.View ArticlePubMed
              13. Martinez Diaz-Guerra G, Hawkins F, Rapado A, Ruiz Diaz MA, Diaz-Curiel M: Hormonal and anthropometric predictors of bone mass in healthy elderly men: major effect of sex hormone binding globulin, parathyroid hormone and body weight. Osteoporos Int 2001,12(3):178–184.View ArticlePubMed
              14. Blum M, Harris SS, Must A, Phillips SM, Rand WM, Dawson-Hughes B: Weight and body mass index at menarche are associated with premenopausal bone mass. Osteoporos Int 2001,12(7):588–594.View ArticlePubMed
              15. Christian JC, Yu PL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CCJ: Heritability of bone mass: a longitudinal study in aging male twins. Am J Hum Genet 1989,44(3):429–433.PubMed
              16. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Hopper JL, Yeates MG, Sambrook PN, Eberl S: Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study. J Clin Invest 1987,80(3):706–710.View ArticlePubMed
              17. Nguyen TV, Howard GM, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA: Bone mass, lean mass, and fat mass: same genes or same environments? Am J Epidemiol 1998,147(1):3–16.PubMed
              18. Nath SK, Chakravarti A, Chen CH, Cooper R, Weder A, Schork NJ: Segregation analysis of blood pressure and body mass index in a rural US community. Hum Biol 2002,74(1):11–23.View ArticlePubMed
              19. Allison DB, Kaprio J, Korkeila M, Koskenvuo M, Neale MC, Hayakawa K: The heritability of body mass index among an international sample of monozygotic twins reared apart. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996,20(6):501–506.PubMed
              20. Flicker L, Hopper JL, Rodgers L, Kaymakci B, Green RM, Wark JD: Bone density determinants in elderly women: a twin study. J Bone Miner Res 1995,10(11):1607–1613.View ArticlePubMed
              21. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Kaprio J, Parkkari J, Koskenvuo M: Genetic factors and osteoporotic fractures in elderly people: prospective 25 year follow up of a nationwide cohort of elderly Finnish twins. Bmj 1999,319(7221):1334–1337.PubMed
              22. Nguyen TV, Esteban LM, White CP, Grant SF, Center JR, Gardiner EM, Eisman JA: Contribution of the collagen I alpha1 and vitamin D receptor genes to the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005,90(12):6575–6579.View ArticlePubMed
              23. Mann V, Ralston SH: Meta-analysis of COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture. Bone 2003,32(6):711–717.View ArticlePubMed
              24. Takeuchi T, Tsuboi T, Arai M, Togari A: Adrenergic stimulation of osteoclastogenesis mediated by expression of osteoclast differentiation factor in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2001,61(5):579–586.View ArticlePubMed
              25. Moore RE, Smith CK, Bailey CS, Voelkel EF, Tashjian AHJ: Characterization of beta-adrenergic receptors on rat and human osteoblast-like cells and demonstration that beta-receptor agonists can stimulate bone resorption in organ culture. Bone Miner 1993,23(3):301–315.View ArticlePubMed
              26. Fujisawa T, Ikegami H, Kawaguchi Y, Ogihara T: Meta-analysis of the association of Trp64Arg polymorphism of beta 3-adrenergic receptor gene with body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998,83(7):2441–2444.View ArticlePubMed
              27. Katsumata K, Nishizawa K, Unno A, Fujita Y, Tokita A: Association of gene polymorphisms and bone density in Japanese girls. J Bone Miner Metab 2002,20(3):164–169.View ArticlePubMed
              28. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA: Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 1999,353(9156):878–882.View ArticlePubMed
              29. Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Gilbert C, Eisman JA: Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES). Osteoporos Int 1994,4(5):277–282.View ArticlePubMed
              30. Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN: Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol 1996,144(3):255–263.PubMed
              31. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA: Osteoporosis in elderly men and women: effects of dietary calcium, physical activity, and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 2000,15(2):322–331.View ArticlePubMed
              32. Clement K, Vaisse C, Manning BS, Basdevant A, Guy-Grand B, Ruiz J, Silver KD, Shuldiner AR, Froguel P, Strosberg AD: Genetic variation in the beta 3-adrenergic receptor and an increased capacity to gain weight in patients with morbid obesity. N Engl J Med 1995,333(6):352–354.View ArticlePubMed
              33. SPSS Inc.: SPSS 13.0 Base User's Guide. Chicago, IL , SPSS Inc. 2004.
              34. Matthews RAJ: Facts versus factions: The use and abuse of subjectivity in scientific research: Barton, Cambridge, UK. 1998.
              35. Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP: Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation. West Sussex, England , John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2004.
              36. SAS Institute Inc.: Base SAS 9.1.3 Procedures Guide, Volumes 1–4. Base SAS 9.1.3 (TS1M3) Edition Cary, NC, USA , SAS Publishing 2004.
              37. Leonard MB, Shults J, Wilson BA, Tershakovec AM, Zemel BS: Obesity during childhood and adolescence augments bone mass and bone dimensions. Am J Clin Nutr 2004,80(2):514–523.PubMed
              38. Ogawa S, Emi M, Shiraki M, Hosoi T, Orimo H, Ouchi Y, Inoue S: Association of amino acid variation (Trp64Arg) in the beta3-adrenergic receptor gene with bone mineral density. Geriatrics and Gerontology International 2002,2(3):138–142.View Article
              39. Kurabayashi T, Carey DG, Morrison NA: The beta 3-adrenergic receptor gene Trp64Arg mutation is overrepresented in obese women. Effects on weight, BMI, abdominal fat, blood pressure, and reproductive history in an elderly Australian population. Diabetes 1996,45(10):1358–1363.View ArticlePubMed
              40. Li LS, Lonnqvist F, Luthman H, Arner P: Phenotypic characterization of the Trp64Arg polymorphism in the beta 3-adrenergic receptor gene in normal weight and obese subjects. Diabetologia 1996,39(7):857–860.PubMed
              41. Oksanen L, Mustajoki P, Kaprio J, Kainulainen K, Janne O, Peltonen L, Kontula K: Polymorphism of the beta 3-adrenergic receptor gene in morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996,20(12):1055–1061.PubMed
              42. Hao K, Peng S, Xing H, Yu Y, Huang A, Hong X, Wang Y, Chen C, Wang B, Zhang X, Liu J, Zhu G, Huo Y, Chen D, Zhao X, Ronnenberg A, Wu D, Niu T, Xu X: beta(3) Adrenergic receptor polymorphism and obesity-related phenotypes in hypertensive patients. Obes Res 2004,12(1):125–130.View ArticlePubMed
              43. Matsushita H, Kurabayashi T, Tomita M, Kato N, Tanaka K: Effects of uncoupling protein 1 and beta3-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms on body size and serum lipid concentrations in Japanese women. Maturitas 2003,45(1):39–45.View ArticlePubMed
              44. Kadowaki H, Yasuda K, Iwamoto K, Otabe S, Shimokawa K, Silver K, Walston J, Yoshinaga H, Kosaka K, Yamada N, et al.: A mutation in the beta 3-adrenergic receptor gene is associated with obesity and hyperinsulinemia in Japanese subjects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995,215(2):555–560.View ArticlePubMed
              45. Livshits G, Deng HW, Nguyen TV, Yakovenko K, Recker RR, Eisman JA: Genetics of bone mineral density: evidence for a major pleiotropic effect from an intercontinental study. J Bone Miner Res 2004,19(6):914–923.View ArticlePubMed
              46. Pre-publication history

                1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2350/​7/​57/​prepub

              Copyright

              © Wang et al. 2006

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.